Skip to main content
Internal Medicine logoLink to Internal Medicine
. 2025 Apr 12;64(19):2897–2900. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4811-24

Copy Number Variations in a Case with Intractable Epilepsy, Intellectual Disability, and Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies Having a 17p12 Deletion

Kengo Maeda 1
PMCID: PMC12549039  PMID: 40222930

Abstract

Some copy number variations (CNVs) in DNA are associated with the development of pathological phenotypes. Regarding the diagnosis of recurrent radial nerve palsies, a 73-year-old female patient with intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability was diagnosed with duplicated 15q11.1-11.2, in addition to a deletion of 17p12, causing hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. CNVs in 15q11.1-11.2 have been reported in patients with schizophrenia and autism. Although CNVs are also sometimes seen in healthy individuals, duplicated 15q11.1-11.2 could be associated with CNS symptoms in this patient.

Keywords: copy number variation, hereditary neuropathy with liability of pressure palsies, intractable epilepsy, intellectual disability

Introduction

Some copy number variations (CNVs) in DNA are associated with the development of pathological phenotypes including cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases (1,2). CNVs have been identified as important risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, intellectual disability, and depression (3).

I herein describe a female patient who was followed up for intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability. The patient's chromosome was analyzed to diagnose recurrent radial nerve palsy. A duplication of 15q11.1-11.2 was discovered as a candidate cause of epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Case Report

A 73-year-old woman presented with a loss of control of her left hand. She had intractable epilepsy since her late twenties and intellectual disability and had been followed up for eight years. She was not a diabetic or alcohol drinker. A neurological examination revealed left radial nerve palsy. She had experienced radial nerve palsy four years previously, and it recurred three months previously. The palsy in the right radial nerve resolved completely. She had a medical history of miscarriage, surgery for cervical canal stenosis, and sepsis after acute pyelonephritis. She was admitted to the hospital several times for epilepsy, which included either a complex partial seizure or secondary generalized convulsion. The patient was treated with levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, and lacosamide. However, epileptic attacks were observed at least once a month. The patient's parents were non-consanguineous. She had a healthy son. The patient was hyperlogically insensitive. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III, performed at the age of 68 years, was VIQ 61, PIQ 59, and FIQ 57. The electroencephalogram detected generalized spike and wave complexes. Computed tomography (CT) of her head did not reveal cortical dysplasia, ischemic lesions, or brain tumors. A nerve conduction study (NCS; Table) was performed during the first episode of radial nerve palsy. The amplitude of the motor and sensory nerve action potentials decreased. The conduction velocity was different among her nerves, from normal to a severe decrease, thus suggesting a mixture of demyelination and axonal degeneration. On the second NCS after left radial nerve palsy, the motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (the usual compression sites) was 33.3 m/s bilaterally. The distal MCVs of the ulnar nerves were 36.6 m/s and 26.7 m/s (right and left), respectively. Although there was no family history of neuropathy, three cases of radial nerve palsy indicated hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP). Fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed deletion of PMP22 (Fig. 1). However, since intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability are uncommon features of HNPP, her chromosome was analyzed further. G-banding test revealed that her karyotype was 46, XX. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) revealed gain of 5q21.2-21.3 (165-219 kb, GRCh37:5:104366033-104531844) and 15q11.1-11.2 (2.28-2.40 Mb, GRCh37:15:20416244-22698581), and loss of 10q11.22 (198-296 kb, GRCh37:10:46949255-47147501) and 17p12 (1.33-1.42Mb, GRCh37:17:14111772-15442066, Fig. 2).

Table.

Nerve Conduction Study at the First Episode of Radial Nerve Palsy.

Motor Nerve Conduction Study
TL (ms) MCV (m/s) CMAP (mV) Temporal Dispersion Conduction Block F wave Minimal Latency F wave Occurrence
R Median 6.0 37.7 3.8 (-) (-) 41.8 1/16
L Median 5.8 52.9 5.0 (-) (-) 31.0 2/16
R Ulnar 5.8 35.1 3.6 (-) (-) 39.7 3/16
L Ulnar 5.1 39.2 5.7 (-) (-) 35.1 6/16
R Radial 2.9 61.2 1.9 (-) (-)
L Radial 2.7 49.6 1.1 (-) (-)
R Tibial 5.0 22.7 0.13 (+) (-) Not evoked
Sensory Nerve Conduction Study
TL (ms) SCV (m/s) SNAP (μV) Temporal Dispersion Conduction Block
R Median 4.3 34.9 2.0 (-) (+)
L Median 4.6 35.1 2.2 (-) (+)
R Ulnar 9.6 11.5 1.4 (+) (+)
L Ulnar 5.8 21.6 2.0 (+) (+)
R Radial 3.5 39.0 7.6 (-)
L Radial 3.3 42.9 4.5 (-)
R Sural Not evoked

TL: terminal latency, MCV: motor nerve conduction velocity, CMAP: compound muscle action potential, SCV: sensory nerve conduction velocity, SNAP: sensory nerve action potential

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization to PMP22 revealed heterozygous deletion of PMP22. Arrowhead indicates hybridized PMP22.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Chromosomal microarray analysis. Results of chromosomes 5, 10, 15, and 17 are shown. Blue columns and blue arrowheads are gains. Red columns and red arrowheads are losses.

Discussion

Repetitive radial nerve palsies were due to HNPP caused by the deletion of PMP22 located on 17p12. The alterations in NCS at non-compression sites suggested the progression of HNPP. Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) is a disease resulting from the deletion of 17p11.2. Its symptoms include intellectual disability, insomnia, behavioral abnormalities, minor physical abnormalities, and epilepsy. The causal gene was RAI1. When the deletion in 17p was long, HNPP was complicated. Since CNVs of the contiguous gene PMP22-RAI1 have been reported (4,5), the chromosome was examined using CMA. However, RAI1 was not included in the deleted region, and SMS deposits were ruled out. The size and location of the deleted site suggest that the deletion could result from two 24-kb low copy number repeats (CMT1A-REPs), which are most frequently found in patients with HNPP (6,7). The genes included in the 17p12 deletion in this case were COX10, CDRT15, HS3ST3B1, MGC12916, LOC101928475, CDRT7, CDRT8, PMP22, MIR4731, TEKT3, TVP23C-CDRT4, CDRT4, CDRT3, and TVP23C. Among these genes, biallelic COX10 variants with PMP22 deletions resulted in Leigh syndrome and HNPP. However, monoallelic COX10 deletions do not cause Leigh syndrome (8). Although the sequence of COX10 in another allele was not determined, the patient was not considered to have Leigh syndrome based on her clinical course and brain CT results. No other gene in this region has been reported to be associated with either intellectual disability or epilepsy.

CMA revealed another unexpected deletion, 10q11.22. No report has been found in association with intellectual disability and epilepsy with a brief deletion of 10q11.22. The genes in this region were LOC101927699, LOC102724593, LOC102724488, SYT15, GPRIN2, NPY4R2, NPY4R, LINC00842, and HNRNPA1P33. None of these have been reported to be related to intellectual disability or epilepsy. Deletion of 10q11.22 has been reported to be pathogenic to recurrent pregnancy loss (9).

CMA revealed two duplications. Duplication of 15q11.1-11.2 has been reported in schizophrenia patients (10). The patient also had a 22q11.2 deletion, which is known as DiGeorge syndrome. Another study reported that the deletion of 15q11.1-11.2 was one of the CNVs found in autistic children (11). A longer duplication, 15q11.1-13.1, is known to result in Dup15q syndrome characterized by hypotonia, developmental delay, epilepsy, and autism (12). The duplicated region in this case was included in the duplicated region of patient 14 with Dup15q syndrome in Borlot's report (13) and in an 11-month-old infant in Lu's report (14). Genes on the duplicated 15q11.1-11.2 in this case were CHEK2P2, HERC2P3, LOC102723534, GOLGA6 L6, GOLGA8CP, NBEAP1, POTEB3, MIR3118-2, MIR3118-3, MIR3118-4, POTEB, POTEB2, NF1P2, MIR5701-2, MIR5701-3, MIR5701-1, LINC01193, LINC02203, FAM30C, LOC646214, CXADRP2, LOC101927079, OR4M2, OR4N4C, OR4N4, OR4N3P, IGHV1OR15-1, LOC102724760, IGHV1OR15-3, LOC642131, MIR1268A, REREP3, MIR4509-1, MIR4509-2, and MIR4509-3. Among them, except for the pseudogene, non-protein coding gene, and micro RNA, GOLGA6 L6, POTEB2, POTEB, OR4M2, and OR4N4 overlapped in this case and a closely similar case reported by Takahashi et al. (10). However, a duplication of 15q11.1-11.2 was found in the controls in the database of genomic variants (GRCh37/hg19 at http://dgv.tcag.ca/dgv/app/home). It is still unknown which gene is responsible for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and autism, and whether this duplication is a normal variant or pathogenic. A brief duplication of 5q21.2-21.3 contained RAB9BP1. However, no relationship between CNV or RAB9BP1 and intellectual disability or epilepsy has previously been reported.

4.8-9.5% of the genome in healthy population contributes to CNV, and approximately 100 genes when completely deleted have no effect on the phenotype (15). Most CNV are located near pericentromeric regions (16). Iafrate et al. identified 255 loci of large-scale CNVs in 55 human DNA samples. In their report, a duplication of 15q11.1-11.2 was not present (17). This case report has limitations in concluding that a duplication of 15q11.1-11.2 could be associated with intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability in this patient. Othe factors such as metabolic diseases, cannot be completely ruled out. CNVs of the patient's parents and son were not performed. However, considering the significance of the duplication of 15q11.1-11.2, it is important to accumulate other cases similar to this patient.

In conclusion, CMA should be considered in the diagnosis of patients presenting with unknown intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability, although the interpretation of the clinical importance of CNVs is limited.

The author states that he has no Conflict of Interest (COI).

References

  • 1.Wain LV, Armour JAL, Tobin MD. Genomic copy number variation, human health, and disease. Lancet 25: 340-350, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beroukhim R, Mermel CH, Porter D, et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 18: 899-905, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rees E, Kirov G. Copy number variation and neuropsychiatric illness. Curr Opin Genet Dev 68: 57-63, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yuan B, Harel T, Gu S, et al. Nonrecurrent 17p11.2p12 rearrangement events that result in two concomitant genomic disorders: the PMP22-RAI1 contiguous gene duplication syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 97: 691-707, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yuan B, Neira J, Gu S, et al. Nonrecurrent PMP22-RAI1 contiguous gene deletions arise from replication-based mechanisms and result in Smith-Magenis syndrome with evident peripheral neuropathy. Hum Genet 135: 1161-1174, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reiter LT, Hastings PJ, Nelis E, et al. Human meiotic recombination products revealed by sequencing a hotspot for homologous strand exchange in multiple HNPP deletion patients. Am J Hum Genet 62: 1023-1033, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Inoue K, Dewar K, Katsanis N, et al. The 1.4-Mb CMT1A duplication/HNPP deletion genomic region reveals unique genome architectural features and provides insights into the recent evolution of new genes. Genome Res 11: 1018-1033, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuroha Y, Ishiguro T, Tada M, et al. Biallelic COX10 mutations and PMP22 deletion in a family with Leigh syndrome and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy. Neurol Genet 8: e200030, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yildiz O, Silan F, Karakaya T, Özdemir Ö. Copy number variations in patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: an array-CGH approach. Turk J Med Sci 52: 1689-1696, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takahashi S, Suzuki T, Nakamura-Tomizuka S, et al. Case history and genome-wide scans for copy number variants in a family with patient having 15q11.1-q11.2 duplication and 22q11.2 deletion, and schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 168B: 229-235, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alhazmi S, Alharthi M, Alzahrani M, et al. Copy number variations in autistic children. Biomed Rep 21: 107, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lusk L, Vogel-Farley V, DiStefano C, Jeste S. Maternal 15q duplication syndrome. In: GeneReviews 2016 (updated 2021). University of Washington, Seattle, 1993-2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borlot F, Regan BM, Bassett AS, Stavropoulos DJ, Andrade DM. Prevalence of pathogenic copy number variation in adults with pediatric-onset epilepsy and intellectual disability. JANA Neurol 74: 1301-1311, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lu Y, Liang Y, Ning S, et al. Rare partial trisomy and tetrasomy of 15q11-q13 associated with developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder. Mol Cytogenet 13: 21, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer S. A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 16: 172-183, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ji Y, Eichler EE, Schwartz S, Nicholls RD. Structure of chromosomal duplicons and their role in mediating human genomic disorders. Genome Res 10: 597-610, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36: 949-951, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Internal Medicine

RESOURCES