Skip to main content
Communications Medicine logoLink to Communications Medicine
. 2025 Oct 24;5:442. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01057-5

Pre-existing comorbidities and hospitalization for COVID-19 are associated with post-COVID conditions in the U.S. veteran population

Aaron J Miller 1,2,#, Guo Wei 3, Gregory J Stoddard 3, Sujee Jeyapalina 1,2,✉,#, Jayant P Agarwal 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC12552489  PMID: 41136644

Abstract

Introduction

Although most survivors of COVID-19 return to their baseline health within two weeks, a notable proportion of individuals continue experiencing symptoms, collectively referred to as Post-COVID Conditions (PCC). To better understand risks associated with contracting PCC, this study aimed to determine whether association exists between pre-existing comorbidities, hospitalization for COVID-19 and the subsequent diagnosis of PCC in US veterans.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study collected data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs electronic medical records from September 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023. Participants were limited to those with electronic medical records of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, who received care from the Veterans Affairs hospital system and survived at least 28 days following the infection.

Results

The multivariable logistic regression analysis reveals in hospitalized veterans, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associates with a 21% increase in odds of a PCC diagnosis (adjusted OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.14–1.29; p < 0.001), while in non-hospitalized veterans, chronic kidney disease (OR 1.09 95%CI 1.03–1.15; p = 0.001)) and COPD (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.27–1.40; p < 0.001) demonstrate an increase in odds of a PCC diagnosis. Additionally, unvaccinated and partially vaccinated veterans exhibit significantly higher odds for PCC (p < 0.001) compared to fully vaccinated veterans in both the hospitalized and non-hospitalized cohorts. Increasing age, increasing BMI, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and veterans residing in the Southwestern United States show a significant (p < 0.05) increase in risk for a positive diagnosis of PCC in both groups.

Conclusions

Veterans with pre-existing COPD or those hospitalized at the time of COVID-19 (indicating disease severity) are at higher risk of receiving a PCC diagnosis.

Subject terms: Viral infection, Epidemiology


Miller et al. examine the possible association between pre-existing comorbidities and hospitalization with subsequent diagnosis of post-COVID conditions (PCC) among Veterans. Veterans with pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or hospitalization during their COVID-19 disease were more likely to be diagnosed with PCC.

Plain language summary

Although most COVID-19 survivors return to their baseline health within two weeks, a large number of individuals continue experiencing symptoms, referred to as Long COVID. This study used electronic medical records from the US Department of Veterans Affairs, specifically records from September 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023, to study this disease. Our analysis revealed an increased risk for Long COVID diagnosis in veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and those who hospitalized. Increasing age and body mass index, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and veterans residing in the Southwestern United States also showed significantly increased risk for contracting Long COVID. In conclusion, veterans with pre-existing COPD or those who were hospitalized at the time of COVID-19 (indicating disease severity) were more likely to be diagnosed with Long COVID.

Introduction

In December 2019, the emergence of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection marked the onset of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Although a majority of individuals who survived COVID-19 manage to recover and return to their usual health within a span of two weeks, a notable proportion of individuals continue to grapple with an array of enduring health issues, collectively referred to as Post-COVID Conditions (PCC), also referred to as Long-COVID1,2. Estimates indicate that around 43% or more of those who contracted COVID-19 worldwide may have developed persistent PCC3,4. Notably, the identification and treatment of PCC/Long-COVID exhibits considerable variation, contingent on the specific criteria adopted and the population under study. The lack of a standardized definition has also led to underreporting of PCC cases57.

Even to date, the lack of consensus persists regarding the precise definition of PCC, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) putting forth differing interpretations. The CDC defines PCC as an infection-associated chronic condition that can occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection and is present for at least 3 months and affect one or more organ systems8. In contrast, the WHO defines PCC as the continuation or development of new symptoms 3 months after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, with these symptoms lasting for at least 2 months with no other explanation9. Within the Veterans Administration, PCC/Long-COVID is defined as symptoms or conditions that manifest or worsen at least four weeks subsequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection and is used when reporting PCC within the nationwide VA hospital systems.

Recognizing the prevalence of PCC, the WHO officially designated it as a distinct ailment and assigned the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code U09.9, which became effective from October 1, 2021, and collectively define all unspecified Post-COVID Conditions10. Although medical practitioners have been employing this ICD-10 code following its approval, clear criteria for its use are yet to be solidified, which could result in some instances of PCC being misdiagnosed or undiagnosed. Among the frequently noted symptoms of PCC are general unease, persistent fatigue, difficulties in concentrating, shortness of breath, and a diminished quality of life11. Notably, it has been reported that the severity of PCC symptoms tends to be more pronounced among females, individuals of older age, those with weaker baseline health, and those who received more intensive care during their COVID-19 disease1217. Veterans constitute one such group, as they often exhibit poorer baseline health compared to the general population18, and are expected to have a higher prevalence proportion than the general public.

Similar to the general population, limited published veterans’ data found associations between PCC and older age, female gender, race, documentation of high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, vaccination status, and those who were hospitalized for initial COVID-191,19. Moreover, based on overwhelming reports of persistent symptoms post-COVID-19, the Department of Veterans Health Administration has opened 22 multispecialty clinics across the US to provide optimal care to veterans with PCC20. Despite this response, the existing VA directive lacks information on the specific disease characteristics for defining the U09.9 ICD-10 code.

To gain a better understanding of risk factors associated with PCC in veterans, we hypothesized that hospitalization during COVID-19 and pre-existing comorbidities would increase the odds of PCC diagnosis. To attain these objectives, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Veterans Affairs (VA) COVID-19 Shared Data Resources with and without clinically diagnosed PCC. This manuscript investigated the demographic and health status attributes of US veterans hospitalized due to COVID-19 and then statistically analyzed the data using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

Methods

Data source

The study protocol underwent review by the Institutional Review Boards of both the University of Utah and the Department of VA Salt Lake City Hospital System. Following assessment, it was determined that informed consent was waived due to the use of deidentified data, and the protocol was exempt from further review. Ethical approvals (IRB# 00165075) were officially granted on May 1, 2023. The data for this study were sourced from the VA’s Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and the VA’s COVID-19 Shared Data Resources. All data were accessed and processed using the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) to ensure the preservation of veterans’ privacy and data security. The data for the present study was collected on September 5, 2023.

Study design

In this retrospective cohort study, the focus was on veterans who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between September 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023, and survived at least 28 days. The study defined COVID-19 index dates as either the date of the first positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antigen test or, if veterans were already receiving care within 15 days before the positive test date, the date of hospital admission. The outcome was veterans who were subsequently diagnosed with PCC using ICD-10 Code U09.9 at least 28 days after their index date. The patient characteristics collected included demographic details, clinical attributes, reported pre-infection comorbidities, COVID-19 index date, whether or not more than one SARS-CoV-19 infection, types of treatment regimens during any COVID-19 episodes (if multiple infections were reported), PCC diagnosis date, and the vaccination status prior to the first COVID-19 index date. A COVID-19 diagnosis was determined through the use of the variable Ever Positive in the VA CDW. Ever Positive is defined as a positive PCR test, positive antigen test or evidence of positivity in clinical notes extracted by natural language processing. For patients with multiple COVID-19 diagnoses, multiple infections were not distinguished from reinfection.

The study employed two outcome groups for the statistical analyses: patients diagnosed with PCC (as indicated by the medical records of ICD-10 code U09.9), and those without this diagnosis. A hierarchical model was used to determine possible correlated variables (data not shown). It was determined that the COVID-19 treatments variables became insignificant upon inclusion of the hospitalized variable, and as such was removed from variable set before creating the multivariable models. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to understand the potential associations between various variables and the assignment of the ICD-10 U09.9 code for PCC diagnosis. Patient comorbidities within 2 years prior to the index date were included. Both prevalence and incidence of PCC diagnosis were also computed.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Veterans who were 18 years or older, had documentation in the electronic health record as Ever Positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023, had at least 1 clinical visit within the 2 years prior to a COVID-19 positive diagnosis and survived over 28 days were included. Those who perished within 28 days post-SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded from this study. Also, there was no limitation placed on the number of times PCC episodes were reported, but a unique patient ID was only counted once. A flow chart of the cohort selection process is given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Study Cohort Selection.

Fig. 1

A flow chart displaying the study cohort selection.

Statistical and reproducibility

The monthly incidence proportion was calculated as the number of new reported PCC diagnoses during the month divided by accumulative SARS-CoV-2 infected veterans who were still at risk for PCC (i.e., they had yet been diagnosed with the PCC). The prevalence proportion was calculated as the sum of all PCC diagnoses up to and including that month, divided by the total number of veterans who were previously diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infections and survived.

As previously mentioned, pertinent clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from veterans’ electronic medical records. This encompassed variables such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, severity of the acute illness, hospitalization status, and treatments administered. The descriptive analysis was conducted on all eligible COVID-19 positive veterans, both those with and without the ICD-10 U09.9 diagnosis. To facilitate analysis, categorical variables were established for age, sex (male or female), race (White, Black, Asian, Native American, and other), ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, NOT Hispanic or Latino, Unknown), geographical regions (West, Midwest, Northwest, Southwest, Southeast, and others), levels of rurality (city, rural, urban), BMI and vaccination status (never, partially, fully vaccinated) at the time of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Fully vaccinated was defined as having received the recommended doses for each vaccine type. Moreover, for illnesses known to exacerbate the severity of COVID-19, dichotomous variables were established based on the 24-month first pre-index date electronic records. All patients lacking at least one VA visit 24-month prior to their index date were removed from the study cohort. Treatments administered during the SARS-CoV-2 infection included whether patients were hospitalized, required mechanical ventilation, received oxygen therapy, or were treated with antibiotics, antiviral medications, and corticosteroids within 60 days of the index date. The data were presented as percentages (%) for categorical variables.

Univariable logistic regression models were employed initially to assess the significance of the relationships between specific variables and the ICD-10 U09.9 diagnostic code reports. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to examine the association between covariates and PCC diagnosis. For this study, the multivariable models were adjusted for all clinical and demographic characteristics that were examined in the univariable logistic regression analyses. As the PCC diagnosis incidence did not exceed 2.41%, which is less than 10% and so meets the rare disease assumption21, the odds ratio (OR) can be interpreted as a relative risk. All P-value measurements are two-sided.

The data analyses were conducted using the STATA version 17 software package (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Results

PCC Incidence and Prevalence

There were 514,328 U.S. veterans older than 18 years of age, and diagnosed with COVID-19 within the study period. Of those, 23,496 individuals (5.3%) were diagnosed with PCC (Fig. 1). On average, veterans were diagnosed with PCC 73 days (mean), with a median of 34 (IQR 14–77) days, after the initial diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. At least 50% of veterans were diagnosed with this disease within 34 days after the reported index date. Figure 2 displays the monthly incidence and prevalence, revealing an upward trajectory for prevalence during the initial stages that eventually plateaued at around 4.48 by April 2022. The monthly incidence fluctuated between 2.41 and 0.05%.

Fig. 2. Prevalence and Incidence Rates of PCC Diagnosed Veterans.

Fig. 2

Line graphs showing the monthly prevalence and incidence of PCC diagnoses within the veteran population. The initial variations plateaued after April 2022, perhaps related to variabilities of recording ICD 10 code or waning efficacy of immunity following initial vaccination64.

Demographics

The characteristics of veterans with electronic records of PCC diagnosis and those without were summarized for comparison in Table 1, which provides the demographic characteristics of the entire veteran cohort, comprising individuals with one or more instances of COVID-19 diagnosis. A similar table containing the same characteristics was also prepared consisting of veterans with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis (Supplementary Table 1). Veterans with and without PCC diagnosis were predominantly White (71.9, 65.0%), male (86.3, 84.6%), and 71–80 years old (28.1, 24.6%, respectively). In both groups, Veterans BMI ≥ 30 (48.5, 45.0%) was the most predominant weight category (Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Veterans Diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Further Subdivided by PCC Diagnosis

Total PCC Negative PCC Positive p-value
N = 444,991 N = 421,495 N = 23,496
Age (Year) <0.001
 18 to 40 73,036 (16.4%) 70,381 (16.7%) 2655 (11.3%)
 41 to 50 55,506 (12.5%) 52,725 (12.5%) 2781 (11.8%)
 51 to 60 80,336 (18.1%) 76,218 (18.1%) 4118 (17.5%)
 61 to 70 91,947 (20.7%) 86,981 (20.6%) 4966 (21.1%)
 71 to 80 110,322 (24.8%) 103,727 (24.6%) 6595 (28.1%)
 ≥81 33,844 (7.6%) 31,463 (7.5%) 2381 (10.1%)
Gender <0.001
 Male 376,657 (84.6%) 356,377 (84.6%) 20,280 (86.3%)
 Female 68,334 (15.4%) 65,118 (15.4%) 3216 (13.7%)
Race <0.001
 White 290,682 (65.3%) 273,785 (65.0%) 16,897 (71.9%)
 American Indian or Alaska Native 3572 (0.8%) 3336 (0.8%) 236 (1.0%)
 Asian 5934 (1.3%) 5680 (1.3%) 254 (1.1%)
 Black or African American 88,918 (20.0%) 85,392 (20.3%) 3526 (15.0%)
 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 4286 (1.0%) 4039 (1.0%) 247 (1.1%)
 Unknown 51,599 (11.6%) 49,263 (11.7%) 2336 (9.9%)
Ethnicity <0.001
 Hispanic or Latino 39,222 (8.8%) 35,813 (8.5%) 3409 (14.5%)
 Not Hispanic or Latino 365,843 (82.2%) 347,150 (82.4%) 18,693 (79.6%)
 Unknown 39,926 (9.0%) 38,532 (9.1%) 1394 (5.9%)
Region <0.001
 West 67,916 (15.3%) 64,904 (15.4%) 3012 (12.8%)
 Midwest 77,775 (17.5%) 74,074 (17.6%) 3701 (15.8%)
 Northeast 56,889 (12.8%) 54,686 (13.0%) 2203 (9.4%)
 Southeast 120,702 (27.1%) 116,432 (27.6%) 4270 (18.2%)
 Southwest 47,146 (10.6%) 40,944 (9.7%) 6202 (26.4%)
 Others/Unknown 74,563 (16.8%) 70,455 (16.7%) 4108 (17.5%)
Rurality <0.001
 City Town 32,123 (7.2%) 30,319 (7.2%) 1804 (7.7%)
 Small Town Rural 24,366 (5.5%) 23,021 (5.5%) 1345 (5.7%)
 Urban 320,228 (72.0%) 303,750 (72.1%) 16,478 (70.1%)
 Unknown 68,274 (15.3%) 64,405 (15.3%) 3869 (16.5%)

Demographic characteristics of veterans with SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 2021 and July 2023 were subsequently categorized based on the presence or absence of ICD-10 U09.9 in their medical records. On average, 68.8 days after the index day of the COVID-19, the ICD-10 code was posted. All section headings are bolded. PCC Post-COVID Conditions. Unknown: missing data.

Table 2.

Additional Demographic Characteristics of Veterans Diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Further Subdivided by PCC Diagnosis

Total PCC Negative PCC Positive p-value
N = 444,991 N = 421,495 N = 23,496
BMI groups(kg/m2) <0.001
 Underweight (<18.5) 5306 (1.2%) 4953 (1.2%) 353 (1.5%)
 Normal weight (18.5–24.9) 78,672 (17.7%) 74,512 (17.7%) 4160 (17.7%)
 Overweight (25–91.9) 145,029 (32.6%) 137,593 (32.6%) 7436 (31.6%)
 Obese (30–39.9) 170,914 (38.4%) 161,451 (38.3%) 9463 (40.3%)
Morbidly Obese (40 + ) 30,121 (6.8%) 28,198 (6.7%) 1923 (8.2%)
 Unknown 14,949 (3.4%) 14,788 (3.5%) 161 (0.7%)
Smoking Status <0.001
 Current Smoker 68,441 (15.4%) 65,358 (15.5%) 3083 (13.1%)
 Former Smoker 165,105 (37.1%) 155,521 (36.9%) 9584 (40.8%)
 Never Smoked 167,338 (37.6%) 157,841 (37.4%) 9497 (40.4%)
 Unknown 44,107 (9.9%) 42,775 (10.1%) 1332 (5.7%)
Comorbidities (within 2 years pre-index date)
 Chronical Kidney Disease (CKD) 57,282 (12.9%) 53,339 (12.7%) 3943 (16.8%) <0.001
 Liver disease 32,323 (7.3%) 30,333 (7.2%) 1990 (8.5%) <0.001
 Hypertension 255,704 (57.5%) 240,723 (57.1%) 14,981 (63.8%) <0.001
 Diabetes 134,396 (30.2%) 126,103 (29.9%) 8293 (35.3%) <0.001
 COPD 65,116 (14.6%) 60,449 (14.3%) 4667 (19.9%) <0.001
COVID-19 positivity record
 COVID-19 disease more than once 23,893 (5.4%) 23,103 (5.5%) 790 (3.4%) <0.001
Vaccination status <0.001
 Full Vaccinated 294,168 (66.1%) 279,378 (66.3%) 14,790 (62.9%)
 Partially vaccinated 23,806 (5.3%) 22,104 (5.2%) 1702 (7.2%)
 Unvaccinated 127,017 (28.5%) 120,013 (28.5%) 7004 (29.8%)
Hospitalized
 Hospitalization or ICU 53,663 (12.1%) 47,153 (11.2%) 6510 (27.7%) <0.001
Treatment for COVID-19
 Mechanical Ventilation use 11,557 (2.6%) 9617 (2.3%) 1940 (8.3%) <0.001
 Oxygen Therapy 30,157 (6.8%) 25,344 (6.0%) 4813 (20.5%) <0.001
 Antibiotic meds use 69,405 (15.6%) 62,680 (14.9%) 6725 (28.6%) <0.001
 Antiviral meds use 73,521 (16.5%) 67,507 (16.0%) 6014 (25.6%) <0.001
 Corticosteroid use 76,617 (17.2%) 69,250 (16.4%) 7367 (31.4%) <0.001

Selected clinical characteristics of veterans with SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 2021 and July 2023 and were subsequently categorized based on the presence or absence of ICD-10 U09.9 code in their medical records. All section headings are bolded. PCC: Post-COVID Conditions. Unknown: missing data.

Clinical characteristics

Table 2 shows selected pertinent health characteristics, which shows the proportions of veterans displaying comorbidities, smoking habits, vaccination status, and the medical treatments that veterans underwent during their SARS-CoV-2 infection(s). Within the PCC diagnosis outcome group, Former Smoker was the most common smoking status (40.8%), while Never Smoked was the most common (40.4%) among the group not diagnosed with PCC. The majority of veterans (63.8%) were reported to have hypertension. Additionally, veterans with PCC had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CDK), liver diseases, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to veterans without a PCC diagnosis. A lower proportion of veterans (3.4%) diagnosed with PCC had experienced more than one SARS-CoV-2 infection episode (i.e., two U09.9 diagnoses greater than 28 days apart from each other). Among those in the PCC diagnosis outcome group, a higher proportion had been hospitalized (27.7 vs. 11.2%), required ventilation (8.3 vs. 2.3%), received oxygen therapy (20.5 vs. 6.0%), or were administered antibiotics (28.6 vs. 14.9%), antiviral medications (25.6 vs. 16.0%), or steroids (31.4 vs. 16.4%). However, the vaccination statuses of the veterans were similar between the two groups.

Logistic regression models

As depicted in Fig. 3, logistic regression models were then employed to compute the ORs. Initial univariable analyses indicated that compared to individuals aged 18–40, older veterans had relatively higher odds of a PCC diagnosis (a relative increase in risk ranging from 40 to 101%). Additionally, sex, race, ethnicity, geographical location, rurality, BMI, smoking status, pre-existing comorbidities, vaccination status, hospitalization, and subsequent treatments for COVID-19 demonstrated significant associations with subsequent diagnosis of PCC diagnosis (Fig. 3, Left). These categories were adjusted in the multivariable model (Fig. 3, Right).

Fig. 3. Odds Ratios for Characteristics Associated with PCC Diagnosis in Veterans.

Fig. 3

Forest plots of univariable a and multivariable b logistic regression models illustrating the relationships between demographics, health factors, and hospitalization and their association with PCC diagnosis in clinically confirmed cases among veterans. CKD Chronic Kidney Disease, COPD Chronic Obstructive. ‘Unknown’ refers to those without any entry for the respective categories. N = 444,991 patients.

The adjusted ORs indicated that increasing age (35–91%), female (17%), Hispanic ethnicity (61%), veterans residing in the southwest US region (206%), BMI of 40+ (24%), COPD (42%) and being not fully vaccinated (40–68%) increased the significant relative risks for PCC diagnosis compared to their respective referents. In contrast, African Americans were 24% (adjusted OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.73–0.79; p < 0.001) less likely to be diagnosed with this disease compared to the White veteran referent. Notably, increasing age and increasing BMI remained significant within the adjusted model. Particularly striking was the finding that veterans from the Southwest region of the USA had approximately three times increased relative odds for PCC diagnosis compared to those from the West.

Given that the adjusted model now predicts hospitalization for COVID-19 as a risk factor for subsequent diagnosis of PCC, we conducted multivariable subgroup analyses on both non-hospitalized and hospitalized veterans (see Fig. 4). In terms of comorbidities, while liver disease, hypertension, and diabetes no longer exhibited significance for increased risk of PCC in the non-hospitalized group, CKD and COPD maintained significant associations with PCC. Likewise, within the hospitalized cohort, only COPD showed a significant 21% increased relative odds for PCC diagnosis. Notably, veterans who were unvaccinated during the COVID-19 illness stage, older adults, those residing in the Southwest U.S., and those with higher BMI had increased relative odds within the hospitalized cohort when compared to those who did not. Black veterans’ adjusted odd ratios revealed that they sustained their relatively protective risk association with PCC in both subgroups.

Fig. 4. Odds Ratios for Characteristics Associated with PCC Diagnosis for Non-Hospitalized and Hospitalized Veterans.

Fig. 4

Forest plots showing multivariable logistic regression models predicting the PCC diagnoses outcome in veterans. Hospitalization was used as the surrogate for COVID-19 severity. a (N = 391,328 patients) Those veterans who, during their COVID-19 disease, were hospitalized (severe cases) and b (N = 53,663 patients) those without hospitalization (less severe cases). CKD Chronic Kidney Disease, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. ‘Unknown’ refers to those without any entry for the respective categories.

Discussion

As stated in the introduction, this study tested the hypothesis that hospitalization for the COVID-19 and pre-existing comorbidities would increase the odds of PCC. The data supported the hypothesis, showing hospitalization and pre-existing comorbidities increased the relative odds of PCC diagnosis. Interestingly, the unvaccinated veterans showed significantly increased relative risk for PCC diagnosis. Also, multiple COVID-19 episodes showed a reduced risk for PCC diagnosis in both non-hospitalized and hospitalized veterans, and it is in agreement with literature22. Among the veteran population receiving care through the nationwide VA hospital systems, subsequent to the introduction of the ICD-10 U09.9 diagnosis code, the monthly prevalence of PCC diagnosis exhibited a range from 2.0 to 4.5 % (at the commencement and culmination of the study period, respectively). The incidence proportion varied from 2.41 to 0.05%. These proportions met the rare disease assumption21; thus, the reported ORs were interpreted as relative risks. On average, PCC diagnosis was documented 73 days, 34 (IQR, 14–77) median days, after the SARS-CoV-2 infection index day, supporting published VA data23.

It is worth noting that many symptoms, such as fatigue, deteriorated quality of life, dyspnea, joint pain, chest discomfort, cough, skin rashes, palpitations, headaches, diarrhea, and sensations like ‘pins and needles,’ along with anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, are reported with PCC2431. Although the prevalence and incidence of each individual symptom among veterans diagnosed with PCC may vary, we did not attempt to calculate them individually. The veterans’ data from EHR indicated that, overall, a lower prevalence of PCC diagnosis (5.3%) compared to what has been reported by the CDC (6.0–11%)32 and other studies3335. These differences were not to be expected within the veteran population, given their free access to the healthcare system. These rate differences could also be attributed to the study design and reporting bias. Study designs that prospectively follow patients or use surveys can be expected to measure higher incidence and prevalence than patient medical records that rely on the ICD-10 code U09.9, as with this study design.

Veterans, relative to non-veterans, tend to have multiple chronic conditions36. Nittas and colleagues reported prevalence estimates ranging from 7.5 to 41.0% based on an umbrella review and a targeted evidence synthesis of 102 studies34. Another meta-analysis reviewing 63 studies noted high heterogeneity in prevalence reporting across different follow-up periods33. Raveendran et al. reported a higher prevalence of approximately 87% among hospitalized patients for residual symptoms compared to those treated for COVID-19 on an outpatient basis15. Although we have yet to attempt to differentiate between prevalence among hospitalized and non-hospitalized cohorts, these differences may be attributed to the complexity and lack of clarity in diagnosing and reporting the PCC diagnosis. The variability in prevalence data can be attributed to differences in study periods (pre- or post- ICD-10 code availability), symptom definitions (CDC vs. WHO), study designs, and reporting practices. Since the introduction of the ICD-10 code for PCC diagnosis, our data (Fig. 2) clearly indicated that from April 2022, the prevalence has stabilized at around 4.5% with new incidence rates of 0.5%, suggesting increasing clarity with reporting of the ICD-10 code and/or veterans did not seek help unless it was physically debilitating.

Most importantly, our data also aligned with prior research indicating that veterans who were hospitalized for acute COVID-19 exhibit a relative 41% increased risk of having a PCC diagnosis on their health record compared to non-hospitalized veterans3739. The PCC may have been driven by extended tissue damage during the severe infection period, affecting organs such as the pulmonary, muscular, neural, and cardiac, as well as pathological systemic inflammation. Recent articles suggested that there were differences in exaggerated humoral responses relative to matched controls in a cross-sectional study40. Again, our data suggest that COVID-19 severity may be related to the subsequent presentation of PCC4042.

The presented data demonstrated significantly increased relative risk (p < 0.05) associations with CKD and COPD, and PCC diagnosis in non-hospitalized veterans. However, within the hospitalized cohort, only COPD was associated with increased risk (p < 0.001). As found in the literature, the presence of diabetes is expected to influence the exacerbation of persisting residual symptoms of COVID-19 via various pathophysiological mechanisms, but our analysis did not find an association with PCC diagnosis. Moreover, it has been reported in a prospective study that included 108 patients with Type 2 diabetes who had COVID-19, as compared to those without, had significantly more fatigue after the acute illness35, which may be inadequately powered compared to the data presented here. It is also worth mentioning that the above study35 used subjective scores such as patient-reported assessment of their fatigue, and their statistical analysis was also limited to reporting group differences35.

A few studies have consistently suggested that PCC diagnosis is more prevalent in females26,43,44 than their male counterparts. Our data corroborates this trend, indicating that non-hospitalized female veterans had a relative 24% higher odds of having a PCC diagnosis compared to male veterans, which was slightly lower (12%) in the hospitalized group; though it was insignificant (p = 0.05). While many studies have reported a two- to four-fold increased risk for female patients43,45, our findings suggest a more modest increased risk. This discrepancy could potentially be attributed to the sample bias inherent to the veteran dataset, which predominantly consists of males (approximately 85%; Table 1). Although gender disparities have been evident in COVID-19 data46,47, with males exhibiting higher mortality rates during COVID-19, the existing literature has not provided a definitive explanation for why PCC diagnosis disproportionately affects females. This disparity may be linked to the inherent immunological differences between sexes or hormonal factors. It is established that females generally mount a stronger immune response to infections4851, which could result in a prolonged immune reaction in some cases, potentially elevating the risk of receiving PCC diagnosis. Additionally, hormonal variations between males and females, including the presence of estrogen and progesterone, can influence immune responses and inflammatory processes52. These hormonal distinctions may contribute to the development of PCC diagnosis, necessitating further research to elucidate their precise role in this phenomenon.

While our adjusted odds ratio indicates a relative 35–85% increased risk among individuals aged 41 and above (Fig. 3, Right), the broader literature presents conflicting findings regarding the association between age and PCC diagnosis19,26,44,53. For instance, Notarte and colleagues analyzed 38 studies and concluded that age is not linked to the presentation of PCC44, while another systematic review identified older age as a risk factor26. Interestingly, within the subset of literature that employed U09.9 chart records to identify PCC cases, adjusted odds ratios did demonstrate an association between age and PCC diagnosis19, supporting our finding. Farmer et al. also found that, in general, veterans who seek health care within the VHA system are generally older and sicker than other veterans who received healthcare elsewhere54, possibly contributing to the disparities in risk reporting.

Our adjusted overall odds ratios (Fig. 3) revealed a relative 8 and 24% increased risks for PCC diagnosis among obese and morbidly obese veterans, respectively. This is in agreement with existing research findings from several sources5558. It is important to underscore that both obesity and veterans’ overall health have been established as substantial risk factors for the severity of COVID-1959 and the subsequent diagnosis of PCC57, thus validating our data. This association could be attributed to the persistent inflammation linked to obesity and the modified immune responses during COVID-19, which contribute to severe illness and serve as risk factors for the emergence of long-term COVID-19 complications (PCC)6062. Consistent with prior research, our veteran-focused data revealed a lower risk of having a PCC diagnosis in the Black race (OR 0.73 for non-hospitalized and OR 0.77 for hospitalized veterans) compared to White counterparts, indicating a degree of protection. This may also be indicative of the underrepresentation of minority races within the study cohort, suggesting underdiagnosis of this group of individuals. When comparing non-Hispanics, there was an elevated relative risk of having a PCC diagnosis in the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (refer to Fig. 3) in both non-hospitalized and hospitalized cohort. Findings from another veterans’ study, which employed an ICD-10 code to identify PCC cases, corroborated our results19. Of particular significance, there was an over 3-fold increase in the odds of PCC diagnoses among veterans in the Southwestern U.S. region, where most of the population identified as of Hispanic origin. This observation highlights a disproportionate prevalence of PCC diagnosis within the Hispanic community, further supporting CDC data63.

This study comes with certain limitations. First, our data only captures diagnoses documented in the electronic medical records. Consequently, PCC may be underdiagnosed among individuals who were less likely to seek medical care for COVID-19 or PCC either due to mild disease presentation or non-clinical factors such as distance to a healthcare facility. Thus, prevalence and incidence rates may have been underreported. Additionally, the methods used in this manuscript to calculate the incidence and prevalence use the assumption that patients do not recover from PCC. Given that this study is retrospective in nature, it is advisable to conduct a prospective study to comprehensively understand the associations between hospitalization and treatment with the diagnosis of PCC. Furthermore, to investigate the potential association between vaccination and PCC diagnosis, it is essential to confirm these findings through a prospective controlled or propensity-matched study, especially since vaccination provides protection for a limited duration. Additionally, considering that long-term COVID symptoms are diverse and have not been explored, it may be valuable to survey individual symptoms as well, which was not investigated in this study.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data 1 (15KB, xlsx)
Supplemental Table 1 (22.5KB, docx)
Reporting Summary (72.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to the setup and maintenance of the Veterans Affairs COVID-19 Shared Data Resource domain. This investigation was supported by an unrestricted investigator-sponsored research grant from Gilead Sciences (# CO-US-983-6072), and with funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1TR004409. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author contributions

S.J. and J.A planned the paper. S.J. conducted a literature review. G.W. and G.J.S. collected and analyzed data. All authors contributed to the data interpretation and discussion, wrote the paper, and edited/approved the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Esther E Velásquez and Sam Packard for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Data availability

Source data for Fig. 2 is in Supplementary Data 1. The other source data that support the findings of this study are available from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA data are made freely available to researchers behind the VA firewall with an approved VA study protocol. For more information on obtaining an approved VA study protocol, visit https://www.virec.research.va.gov or contact the VA Information Resource Center at VIReC@va.gov.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Aaron J. Miller, Sujee Jeyapalina, Jayant P. Agarwal.

Contributor Information

Sujee Jeyapalina, Email: sujee.jeyapalina@hsc.utah.edu.

Jayant P. Agarwal, Email: jay.agarwal@hsc.utah.edu

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s43856-025-01057-5.

References

  • 1.Xie, Y., Bowe, B. & Al-Aly, Z. Burdens of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 by severity of acute infection, demographics and health status. Nat. Commun.12, 6571 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prevention, C. f. D. C. a. Post-COVID conditions: information for healthcare providers (2022).
  • 3.Whitaker, M. et al. Persistent COVID-19 symptoms in a community study of 606,434 people in England. Nat. Commun.13, 1957 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen, C. et al. Global prevalence of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition or long COVID: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J. Infect. Dis.226, 1593–1607 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Son, K. et al. Circulating anti-nuclear autoantibodies in COVID-19 survivors predict long COVID symptoms. Eur. Respir. J.61, 2200970 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Pfaff, E. R. et al. Identifying who has long COVID in the USA: a machine learning approach using N3C data. Lancet Digit Health4, e532–e541 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McGrath, L. J. et al. Use of the postacute sequelae of COVID-19 diagnosis code in routine clinical practice in the US. JAMA Netw. Open5, e2235089 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prevention, U. S. C. f. D. C. a. Clinical overview of long COVID (2024).
  • 9.Organization, W. H. Post COVID-19 condition (Long COVID) (2022).
  • 10.Organization, W. H. ICD-10 Version:2019 (2019).
  • 11.Michelen, M. et al. Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health6, e225427 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Astin, R. et al. Long COVID: mechanisms, risk factors and recovery. Exp. Physiol.108, 12–27 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Koc, H. C., Xiao, J., Liu, W., Li, Y. & Chen, G. Long COVID and its management. Int J. Biol. Sci.18, 4768–4780 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Proal, A. D. & VanElzakker, M. B. Long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): an overview of biological factors that may contribute to persistent symptoms. Front. Microbiol.12, 698169 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raveendran, A. V., Jayadevan, R. & Sashidharan, S. Long COVID: an overview. Diab. Metab. Syndr.15, 869–875 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Robertson, M. M. et al. The epidemiology of long coronavirus disease in US adults. Clin. Infect. Dis.76, 1636–1645 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robinson, P. Long COVID and breathlessness: an overview. Br. J. Community Nurs.26, 438–443 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schult, T. M., Schmunk, S. K., Marzolf, J. R. & Mohr, D. C. The health status of veteran employees compared to civilian employees in veterans health administration. Mil. Med.184, e218–e224 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ioannou, G. N. et al. Rates and factors associated with documentation of diagnostic codes for long COVID in the national veterans affairs health care system. JAMA Netw. Open5, e2224359 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Campos, C. L. et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome clinical pathway for the US Veterans Health Administration. J. Clin. Pathw.9, 22–28 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cornfield, J. A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data; applications to cancer of the lung, breast, and cervix. J. Natl Cancer Inst.11, 1269–1275 (1951). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bosworth, M. L. et al. Risk of new-onset long COVID following reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: a community-based cohort study. Open Forum Infect. Dis.10, ofad493 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Galloway, A. et al. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity on long-term events in United States veterans using the veterans affairs severity index for COVID-19. J. Infect. Dis.226, 2113–2117 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pavli, A., Theodoridou, M. & Maltezou, H. C. Post-COVID syndrome: incidence, clinical spectrum, and challenges for primary healthcare professionals. Arch. Med. Res.52, 575–581 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van Kessel, S. A. M., Olde Hartman, T. C., Lucassen, P. & van Jaarsveld, C. H. M. Post-acute and long-COVID-19 symptoms in patients with mild diseases: a systematic review. Fam. Pr.39, 159–167 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cabrera Martimbianco, A. L., Pacheco, R. L., Bagattini, A. M. & Riera, R. Frequency, signs and symptoms, and criteria adopted for long COVID-19: a systematic review. Int J. Clin. Pr.75, e14357 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chiappelli, F. & Fotovat, L. Post acute CoViD-19 syndrome (PACS) - long CoViD. Bioinformation18, 908–911 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arnold, D. T. et al. Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: results from a prospective UK cohort. Thorax76, 399–401 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carfi, A., Bernabei, R., Landi, F. & Gemelli Against, C.-P.-A. C. S. G. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA324, 603–605 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Docherty, A. B. et al. Features of 20,133 UK patients in hospital with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ369, m1985 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tenforde, M. W. et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network - United States, March-June 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.69, 993–998 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ford, N. D. et al. Long COVID and significant activity limitation among adults, by age - United States, June 1-13, 2022, to June 7-19, 2023. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.72, 866–870 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alkodaymi, M. S. et al. Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.28, 657–666 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nittas, V. et al. Long COVID through a public health lens: an umbrella review. Public Health Rev.43, 1604501 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mittal, J. et al. High prevalence of post COVID-19 fatigue in patients with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study. Diab. Metab. Syndr.15, 102302 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boersma, P., Cohen, R. A., Zelaya, C. E. & Moy, E. Multiple chronic conditions among veterans and nonveterans: United States, 2015-2018. Natl Health Stat Report, 1-13 (2021). [PubMed]
  • 37.Peghin, M. et al. Post-COVID-19 symptoms 6 months after acute infection among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.27, 1507–1513 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perez-Gonzalez, A. et al. Long COVID in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients in a large cohort in Northwest Spain, a prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep.12, 3369 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Subramanian, A. et al. Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults. Nat. Med.28, 1706–1714 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Klein, J. et al. Distinguishing features of long COVID identified through immune profiling. Nature623, 139–148 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Li, M. et al. Longitudinal immune profiling reveals dominant epitopes mediating long-term humoral immunity in COVID-19-convalescent individuals. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.149, 1225–1241 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pandori, W. J. et al. Single-cell immune profiling reveals long-term changes in myeloid cells and identifies a novel subset of CD9(+) monocytes associated with COVID-19 hospitalization. J. Leukoc. Biol.112, 1053–1063 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bai, F. et al. Female gender is associated with long COVID syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.28, 611–616 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Notarte, K. I. et al. Age, sex and previous comorbidities as risk factors not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection for long COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med.11, 7314 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Thompson, E. J. et al. Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records. Nat. Commun.13, 3528 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ho, J. Q. et al. The immune response to COVID-19: does sex matter? Immunology166, 429–443 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ciarambino, T., Para, O. & Giordano, M. Immune system and COVID-19 by sex differences and age. Women’s Health17, 17455065211022262 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ruggieri, A., Anticoli, S., D’Ambrosio, A., Giordani, L. & Viora, M. The influence of sex and gender on immunity, infection and vaccination. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita52, 198–204 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fischinger, S., Boudreau, C. M., Butler, A. L., Streeck, H. & Alter, G. Sex differences in vaccine-induced humoral immunity. Semin Immunopathol.41, 239–249 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pennell, L. M., Galligan, C. L. & Fish, E. N. Sex affects immunity. J. Autoimmun.38, J282–J291 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dias, S. P., Brouwer, M. C. & van de Beek, D. Sex and gender differences in bacterial infections. Infect. Immun.90, e0028322 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ghosh, S. & Klein, R. S. Sex drives dimorphic immune responses to viral infections. J. Immunol.198, 1782–1790 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.O’Hare, A. M. et al. Complexity and challenges of the clinical diagnosis and management of long COVID. JAMA Netw. Open5, e2240332 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Farmer, C. M., Hosek, S.D. & Adamson, D.M. Balancing demand and supply for veterans’ health care: a summary of three RAND assessments conducted under the Veterans Choice Act. Rand Health Q6, 12 (2016). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vimercati, L. et al. Association between long COVID and overweight/obesity. J. Clin. Med.10, 4143 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Ray, J. G., Cohen, E., Butler, E. A., Grandi, S. & Park, A. Indicators of cardiometabolic function in pregnancy and long-term risk of COVID-19: population-based cohort study. Cureus15, e35325 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Loosen, S. H. et al. Obesity and lipid metabolism disorders determine the risk for development of long COVID syndrome: a cross-sectional study from 50,402 COVID-19 patients. Infection50, 1165–1170 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peter, R. S. et al. Association of BMI with general health, working capacity recovered, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Obesity31, 43–48 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ni, S. J., Gao, J. L. & Shen, S. S. Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia: high risks for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Acta Physiologica Sinica74, 783–791 (2022). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Arulanandam, B., Beladi, H. & Chakrabarti, A. Obesity and COVID-19 mortality are correlated. Sci. Rep.13, 5895 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tadayon Najafabadi, B. et al. Obesity as an independent risk factor for COVID-19 severity and mortality. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.5, CD015201 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kadowaki, T. et al. Obesity, overweight, and severe prognosis in COVID-19 patients in Japan. J. Infect. Chemother.29, 1109–1113 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 63.Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, P.D., M.P.H., Anjel Vahratian, Ph.D., M.P.H., Cria G. Perrine, Ph.D., and Jeanne Bertolli, Ph.D., M.P.H. Long COVID in Adults: United States, 2022 (2023). [PubMed]
  • 64.Fiolet, T., Kherabi, Y., MacDonald, C. J., Ghosn, J. & Peiffer-Smadja, N. Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.28, 202–221 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data 1 (15KB, xlsx)
Supplemental Table 1 (22.5KB, docx)
Reporting Summary (72.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Source data for Fig. 2 is in Supplementary Data 1. The other source data that support the findings of this study are available from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA data are made freely available to researchers behind the VA firewall with an approved VA study protocol. For more information on obtaining an approved VA study protocol, visit https://www.virec.research.va.gov or contact the VA Information Resource Center at VIReC@va.gov.


Articles from Communications Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES