Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research logoLink to Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
. 1988 Jan;52(1):111–119.

Healing of cutaneous wounds in the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis).

D A Smith 1, I K Barker 1
PMCID: PMC1255409  PMID: 3349388

Abstract

Healing of cutaneous wounds was studied in groups of common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) held at 13.5 degrees C, 21 degrees C and 30 degrees C. Linear unsutured incisions and circular excisional wounds were evaluated two, five, and ten days after surgery, while linear sutured and unsutured incisions and circular and square excisional wounds were studied three and six weeks after wound production. The sequence of events during healing was the same for all experimental situations. The epithelial margins of the wounds moved freely over exposed epaxial muscle until an exudate of fibrin and inflammatory cells caused adhesion. Heterophils and macrophages were present two days after wounding. Heterophils were present throughout the wound while macrophages were concentrated in areas containing fibrin and proteinaceous exudate. Fibroblasts moved laterally into the wound from the adjacent dermis producing a flat dermal scar oriented parallel to the wound surface. Epithelial cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia occurred in a zone extending up to 1.5 mm from the margin of the wound. A tongue of flattened epithelial cells extended across the wound surface, mingling with the superficial crust and migrating over eosinophilic fibrillar material. Maturation of the new epithelium, indicated by formation of a distinct basal layer, rounding of superficial cells and keratin production, began at the wound margins before the epithelial spurs linked. The epithelium over healed wounds appeared normal, but the dermis did not reorganize to form scales. Reptilian and mammalian healing differ in the character of the inflammatory reaction, the pattern of fibroplasia, and the interaction between epithelial and dermal repair.

Full text

PDF
111

Images in this article

113Fig. 1.
on p.113
113Fig. 2.
on p.113
114Fig. 3.
on p.114
114Fig. 4.
on p.114
114Fig. 5.
on p.114
115Fig. 6.
on p.115
115Fig. 7.
on p.115
115Fig. 8.
on p.115
116Fig. 9.
on p.116
116Fig. 10.
on p.116
116Fig. 11.
on p.116
117Fig. 12.
on p.117
117Fig. 13.
on p.117
117Fig. 14.
on p.117
118Fig. 15.
on p.118

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bertsch S., Marks F. A comparative study on wound-healing in neonatal and adult mouse epidermis in vivo. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1982 Jan;15(1):81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1982.tb01026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark R. A., Lanigan J. M., DellaPelle P., Manseau E., Dvorak H. F., Colvin R. B. Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. J Invest Dermatol. 1982 Nov;79(5):264–269. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12500075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Croft C. B., Tarin D. Ultrastructural studies of wound healing in mouse skin. I. Epithelial behaviour. J Anat. 1970 Jan;106(Pt 1):63–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flaxman B. A., Maderson P. F., Szabó G., Roth S. I. Control of cell differentiation in lizard epidermis in vitro. Dev Biol. 1968 Oct;18(4):354–374. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hurley J. V., Ryan G. B., Friedman A. The mononuclear response to intrapleural injection in the rat. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1966 Apr;91(2):575–587. doi: 10.1002/path.1700910234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jortner B. S., Adams W. R. Turpentine-induced inflammation in the chicken. A light- and electron- microscope study, with emphasis on the macrophage, epithelioid cell, and multinucleated giant cell reaction. Avian Dis. 1971 Jul-Sep;15(3):533–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leibovich S. J., Ross R. The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Pathol. 1975 Jan;78(1):71–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maderson P. F., Roth S. I. A histological study of the early stages of cutaneous wound healing in lizards in vivo and in vitro. J Exp Zool. 1972 May;180(2):175–185. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401800205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maderson P. F., Zucker A. H., Roth S. I. Epidermal regeneration and percutaneous water loss following cellophane stripping of reptile epidermis. J Exp Zool. 1978 Apr;204(1):11–32. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402040103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mateo M. R., Roberts E. D., Enright F. M. Inflammation induced by subcutaneous turpentine inoculation of young American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Am J Vet Res. 1984 Sep;45(9):1870–1875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mateo M. R., Roberts E. D., Enright F. M. Morphologic, cytochemical, and functional studies of peripheral blood cells of young healthy American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Am J Vet Res. 1984 May;45(5):1046–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matoltsy A. G., Viziam C. B. Further observations on epithelialization of small wounds: an autoradiographic study of incorporation and distribution of 3H-thymidine in the epithelium covering skin wounds. J Invest Dermatol. 1970 Jul;55(1):20–25. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12290488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nair M. K. The early inflammatory reaction in the fowl. A light microscopical, ultrastructural and autoradiographic study. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1973:1–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Odland G., Ross R. Human wound repair. I. Epidermal regeneration. J Cell Biol. 1968 Oct;39(1):135–151. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ordman L. J., Gillman T. Studies in the healing of cutaneous wounds. I. The healing of incisions through the skin of pigs. Arch Surg. 1966 Dec;93(6):857–882. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1966.01330060001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PAZ R. A., SPECTOR W. G. The mononuclear-cell response to injury. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1962 Jul;84:85–103. doi: 10.1002/path.1700840111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ryan G. B. The origin and sequence of the cells found in the acute inflammatory response. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1967 Apr;45(2):149–162. doi: 10.1038/icb.1967.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simpson D. M., Ross R. The neutrophilic leukocyte in wound repair a study with antineutrophil serum. J Clin Invest. 1972 Aug;51(8):2009–2023. doi: 10.1172/JCI107007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith D. A., Barker I. K., Allen O. B. The effect of ambient temperature and type of wound on healing of cutaneous wounds in the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):120–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith D. A., Barker I. K., Allen O. B. The effect of certain topical medications on healing of cutaneous wounds in the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):129–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tsukamoto Y., Helsel W. E., Wahl S. M. Macrophage production of fibronectin, a chemoattractant for fibroblasts. J Immunol. 1981 Aug;127(2):673–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES