Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research logoLink to Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
. 1988 Jan;52(1):134–136.

The influence of premating feed intake on the reproductive performance of gilts.

R N Kirkwood 1, B N Mitaru 1, A D Gooneratne 1, R Blair 1, P A Thacker 1
PMCID: PMC1255412  PMID: 3349392

Abstract

In an attempt to improve the reproductive performance of gilts mated at puberty, 70 Yorkshire x Landrace gilts were allocated at 120 d of age and 60 kg body weight to one of two treatments. Restricted gilts were fed 2.0 kg d-1 of a diet formulated to provide 18% crude protein and 14.5 MJ DE kg-1 from selection until mated at their first estrus (n = 35). Flushed gilts were fed 2.0 kg d-1 of the same diet from 120 to 150 d of age, but then had their feed intake increased to 3.5 kg d-1 until mated at their first estrus (n = 35). An additional group of gilts (control fed; n = 33) were fed 3.0 kg d-1 from selection until they were bred at their third estrus in order to investigate the influence of feed restriction on the onset of puberty. During gestation all gilts were fed 1.8 to 2.2 kg d-1 of a 16.8% crude protein diet having 13.7 MJ DE kg-1. Control fed gilts were younger (p less than 0.05) at puberty (150 d) than restricted (165 d) or flushed gilts (165 d). There was no difference in subsequent litter size between the restricted and flushed gilts (7.7 and 8.0, respectively). It is concluded that the institution of a flushing nutritional regime in the prepubertal period will not enhance piglet production from gilts mated at puberty.

Full text

PDF
134

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aherne F. X., Kirkwood R. N. Nutrition and sow prolificacy. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1985;33:169–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blichfeldt T., Almlid T. The relationship between ovulation rate and embryonic survival in gilts. Theriogenology. 1982 Nov;18(5):615–620. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(82)90193-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis D. L., Stevenson J. S., Pollmann D. S., Allee G. L. Estrous and litter traits in gilts altered by altrenogest, flushing and pubertal status. J Anim Sci. 1987 Apr;64(4):1117–1126. doi: 10.2527/jas1987.6441117x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friendship R. M., Wilson M. R., Almond G. W., McMillan I., Hacker R. R., Pieper R., Swaminathan S. S. Sow wastage: reasons for and effect on productivity. Can J Vet Res. 1986 Apr;50(2):205–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. King R. H., Williams I. H. The influence of ovulation rate on subsequent litter size in sows. Theriogenology. 1984 Apr;21(4):677–680. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(84)90451-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Young L. G., King G. J. Reproductive performance of gilts bred on first versus third estrus. J Anim Sci. 1981 Jul;53(1):19–25. doi: 10.2527/jas1981.53119x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES