Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research logoLink to Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
. 1990 Jun;54(3):355–359.

Pathogenesis and serodiagnosis of experimental Trichinella spiralis spiralis and Trichinella spiralis nativa infections in cattle.

H J Smith 1, K E Snowdon 1, G G Finley 1, L F Laflamme 1
PMCID: PMC1255669  PMID: 2379115

Abstract

Trichinella spiralis spiralis infections were established in cattle by gavage and by feeding infected musculature in the ration. Trichinae were present in greatest numbers in masseter, tongue and diaphragm. Trichinella spiralis nativa had a low infectivity to cattle although a light infection was established in one cow by a heavy challenge. Cattle had an aversion to eating musculature unless it was camouflaged with molasses. Clinical signs of reluctance to eat and masticate were observed between 10 and 30 days postinfection. Eosinophil counts started to increase at seven days and peaked at about 30 days postinfection. By day 60 eosinophil counts returned to near preinfection levels but in animals examined greater than 90 days postinfection, the counts were variable. Focal lesions of eosinophilic myositis were observed up to about 90 days postinfection. Little cellular reaction was observed surrounding trichinae after muscle invasion and cyst development was completed except for cysts undergoing disintegration. Seroconversion occurred in all cattle examined between 7 and 14 days postinfection. Seroconversion was associated with IgG1 and IgG2 immunoglobulins. Peak levels of antibody occurred between 30 and 60 days. Cattle examined at 182 and 369 days postinfection showed a gradual decrease in antibody levels over time.

Full text

PDF
355

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gamble H. R., Anderson W. R., Graham C. E., Murrell K. D. Diagnosis of swine trichinosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an excretory--secretory antigen. Vet Parasitol. 1983 Nov;13(4):349–361. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(83)90051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KENNEDY P. C. Experimental bovine trichinosis: an attempt to produce eosinophilic myositis of cattle. Cornell Vet. 1955 Apr;45(2):127–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Smith H. J. Comparison of pepsin-digestion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of trichinosis in swine. Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):63–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith H. J. Evaluation of the ELISA for the serological diagnosis of trichinosis in Canadian swine. Can J Vet Res. 1987 Apr;51(2):194–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith H. J., Snowdon K. E. Comparative assessment of a double antibody enzyme immunoassay test kit and a triple antibody enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis spiralis and Trichinella spiralis nativa infections in swine. Can J Vet Res. 1989 Oct;53(4):497–499. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith H. J., Snowdon K. E. Experimental Trichinella infections in ponies. Can J Vet Res. 1987 Jul;51(3):415–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith H. J., Snowdon K. E. Experimental trichinosis in sheep. Can J Vet Res. 1989 Jan;53(1):112–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES