Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2025 Oct 16;21(10):e1013133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013133

HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella serovars at elevated physiological temperatures

Rivka Shem-Tov 1,2,3, Ohad Gal-Mor 1,2,3,*
Editor: Matthew C Wolfgang4
PMCID: PMC12561990  PMID: 41100568

Abstract

Salmonella enterica is a diverse bacterial pathogen consisting of both typhoidal and nontyphoidal clinically distinct serovars. While typhoidal serovars cause in humans a systemic life-threatening enteric fever, nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) usually provoke a localized self-limiting gastroenteritis. Factors responsible for the different diseases caused by distinct Salmonella serovars are still poorly understood. Here, we show that at elevated physiological temperature, manifested during enteric fever (39–40°C), the transcription of the flagellar regulon, its protein translation, and flagella-mediated motility are all repressed in the typhoidal serovar, S. Paratyphi A. In contrast, the NTS representative serovar, S. Typhimurium, maintains similar or even higher levels of flagellar genes transcription, translation, and motility at 40°C relative to 37°C. By using a temperature-responsive chromogenic reporter system in conjunction with a dense transposon mutagenesis screen we found that under elevated temperature, HilE negatively regulates S. Paratyphi A motility in a HilD-dependent manner. Because HilD is required for the transcriptional activation of flhDC, encoding the master regulator of the Salmonella flagellar-chemotaxis regulon, null deletion of hilE leads to motility upregulation at elevated temperature and the loss of motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A. Moreover, we show that a HilE-mediated motility thermoregulation is common to other typhoidal serovars, including S. Typhi and S. Sendai, but not to S. Paratyphi B, nor to various NTS serovars. Interestingly, the absence of HilE also leads to a hyper-uptake of S. Paratyphi A by THP-1 human macrophages at 40°C, but not at 37°C. Based on these results, we propose that HilE plays a unique role in motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella in a way that may restrain systemic dissemination of the pathogen via professional phagocytes, during the acute phase of enteric fever.

Author summary

Despite high genetic similarity, typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) strains of the single species Salmonella enterica cause in humans different diseases manifested as life-threatening enteric fever and short-term gastroenteritis, respectively. Currently, we are still ignorant about bacterial factors shaping the different lifestyles of typhoidal vs. NTS strains. Here we characterized differences in the regulation of Salmonella motility, which is an important virulence-associated phenotype, in response to changes in temperature, between typhoidal and NTS. We found that at elevated temperature, equivalent to the body temperature during enteric fever (39–40°C), the motility of typhoidal Salmonella, but not that of NTS is strongly repressed, by the negative regulator HilE in a HilD-dependent manner. Moreover, we demonstrate that HilE plays a previously unknown role in the interaction of S. Paratyphi A with phagocytic cells, as the absence of HilE caused enhanced uptake of this pathogen by human macrophages at elevated physiological temperature, but not at 37°C. Because motility thermoregulation by HilE was found in three different typhoidal serovars, but not in NTS, we hypothesize that motility regulation affects the interactions of Salmonella with its host and differences in its regulation contribute to the distinct pathogenicity of typhoidal vs. NTS strains.

Introduction

Salmonella enterica (S. enterica) is a ubiquitous and diverse bacterial pathogen and the causative agent of different infectious diseases that range from a self-limiting gastroenteritis to a life-threatening enteric (typhoid) fever [1,2]. More than 2600 distinct S. enterica serovars defined so far [3] could be phenotypically classified according to their ability to infect different hosts (host-specificity profile) and the nature of the disease they cause [4]. Nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) serovars such as S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) are generally characterized by a broad host-specificity, and their infection of immunocompetent humans normally leads to an acute inflammation of the small intestine, presented as a self-limiting gastroenteritis [5]. In contrast, Typhoidal Salmonella serovars, including S. enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi), S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A (S. Paratyphi A), and S. enterica serovar Sendai (S. Sendai) are all human-specific Salmonella serovars that can cause bacteremia and invasive enteric fever. In this non-inflammatory febrile disease, Salmonella infection does not remain contained within the intestinal mucosa, but instead is disseminated via the blood circulatory system to systemic sites, including the mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, liver, and occasionally the gallbladder [6,7].

Besides the different host-specificity profile and the distinct clinical manifestation, another phenotype that differentiates typhoidal from NTS is motility thermoregulation. Flagella-mediated motility is an important trait that is engaged in multiple virulence-associated processes, including host cell adherence, biofilm formation, protein secretion, and invasion [8]. Previously, we showed that while NTS retain their flagella-mediated motility at elevated physiological temperatures (39–42°C), typhoidal Salmonella demonstrates motility suppression under these conditions [9,10]. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanism underlying this phenotype remained elusive.

Flagellar assembly and chemotaxis in Salmonella is a hierarchical and tightly controlled process that involves the expression of more than 60 genes, organized in a feedforward regulatory cascade consisting of three transcriptional classes [11]. The class 1 operon contains the flhD and flhC genes that together encode the master regulator of the flagella-chemotaxis regulon, FlhDC. The heteromultimeric complex (FlhD4C2) is positioned at the top of this hierarchy and activates the transcription of class 2 operons. Class 2 genes encode components of the basal body and hook, the alternative sigma factor σ28, FliA and the corresponding anti-σ28 factor, FlgM. FliA activates the transcription of the class 3 genes, which encode the flagellin (FliC and FljB), other proteins needed late in flagellar biogenesis and the chemotaxis signal transduction system that directs the bacterial motion [8,12] (S1A Fig).

Here we show that motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A and other typhoidal serovars is mediated by the negative regulator HilE, in a HilD-dependent manner. As a result, HilD-dependent flhDC transcription is inhibited at elevated physiological temperatures. Deletion of HilE in S. Paratyphi A relieves motility suppression and results in induced expression of the entire motility chemotaxis regulon and increased motility at higher temperatures. Moreover, we show that the absence of HilE significantly increases the ability of S. Paratyphi A to enter human phagocytic cells at elevated temperatures, but not at 37°C. These results suggest that HilE may play a role as a virulence mediator by limiting S. Paratyphi A uptake by phagocytic cells during the acute phase of enteric fever. This activity may maintain a balance between systemic dissemination and intestinal residing and shedding by typhoidal Salmonella.

Results

Quantifying the motility thermoregulation at the transcriptional and translational levels

Previously we reported that while S. Typhimurium maintained similar or even increased levels of motility at 42°C compared to 37°C, S. Paratyphi A demonstrated significantly reduced motility at the elevated temperature. We also showed that the reduced motility is associated with downregulation of several class 2 and 3 motility genes, including fliZ, flgM, cheA, and fliC, at 42°C relative to their expression at 37°C [9]. Here we sought to characterize this phenotype more systematically and determined the fold change in gene expression of 21 genes, representing all of the 18 functional operons, constituting the motility-chemotaxis regulon of S. Paratyphi A (S1A Fig). To study changes in gene expression under conditions that mimic the acute phase of enteric fever, we compared their expression at 37°C and 40°C, to reflect more accurately the most marked clinical symptom of patients with enteric fever [13,14]. We extracted RNA from S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures grown in LB at 37°C and 40°C and used quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to quantify the expression of their motility genes. In agreement with our previous findings from experiments conducted at a slightly higher temperature [9], we found that the flagellar genes were significantly downregulated in S. Paratyphi A at 40°C relative to their expression at 37°C (mean fold difference for 21 genes was 4.9; median fold difference was 12.5). In contrast, the expression of the motility-chemotaxis genes in S. Typhimurium was either similar or even moderately higher at 40°C compared to 37°C (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A vs. S. Typhimurium.

Fig 1

(A) S. Typhimurium (STM) and S. Paratyphi A (SPA) cultures were grown in LB for 3 h at 37°C and 40°C to the late logarithmic phase under aerobic condition. The fold change in the transcription of flagellar and motility genes at 40°C relative to 37°C was determined by RT-qPCR and is normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene 16S rRNA. Columns show the mean and the standard error of the mean (SEM), indicated by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance between gene expression in S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium. (B) Flagellar and motility protein expression, was determined by LC-MS/MS. Fold change in protein abundance at 40°C vs. 37°C normalized to RpoD is presented. The heat shock protein, IbpB was included as a positive control for a temperature-responsive protein. RpsK, a 30S ribosomal protein, served as a control for temperature-independent expressed protein. The # sign marks S. Paratyphi A proteins that were detected by MS at 37°C, but were undetected at 40°C and got a quotient value of zero. (C) Overnight S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures that were grown at 37°C were spotted on soft LB agar plates that were incubated at 37°C or 40°C for 5.5 h. (D) The measured swimming radius of S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures at 37°C and 40°C is shown. Bars indicate the mean value and its associated SEM of at least three biological repeats. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to calculate statistical significance between the swimming radius at 37°C and 40°C.*, P-value <0.05; **, P-value <0.01 ***, P-value < 0.0001.

To characterize these differences on the protein level, we applied liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) and determined the relative levels of the flagellar proteins (S1B Fig) at 40°C relative to 37°C in S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A. Concurring with the transcriptional data, we found that in S. Paratyphi A, flagellar and motility proteins were expressed at significantly lower levels at 40°C compared to 37°C (mean fold difference for 21 genes was 2.9; median fold difference was 13.8). The small ribosomal subunit protein uS11 RpsK that was used as an abundant temperature-independent protein control demonstrated similar expression levels at both temperatures. In contrast, the expression levels of the small heat shock protein IbpB that was used as a positive control increased by 3-fold in S. Typhimurium and 2-fold in S. Paratyphi A at 40°C relative to 37°C (Fig 1B).

As expected, these differences were also reflected at the phenotypic level, as the swimming motility of S. Paratyphi A on LB soft agar plates was reduced by more than 2-fold at 40°C compared to 37°C, while S. Typhimurium motility slightly increased by 1.4-fold under these conditions (Fig 1C and 1D). We concluded from these results that the motility regulon in S. Paratyphi A, but not in S. Typhimurium, is repressed by an unknown mechanism at 40°C compared to 37°C, and that this repression is evident on the transcriptional, translational, and phenotypic levels.

Construction of a temperature-responsive reporter system of the S. Paratyphi A motility regulon

To identify genes involved in the motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A we sought to take a transposon mutagenesis approach and designed a temperature-responsive reporter system that allowed visual screening of a large transposon library. For that purpose, a promoterless β-galactosidase gene (lacZY) was cloned under three different motility gene promoters, which demonstrated in S. Paratyphi A a high fold difference in their expression between 37°C and 40°C, including motA (9-fold), fliC (12-fold), and flhB (17-fold). These constructs were introduced into S. Paratyphi A and the appearance of these reporter strains was visually evaluated on LB agar plates supplemented with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-D-galactoside (X-gal) at 37°C and 40°C. As the color of the colonies is dependent on the activity of the lacZ gene product, we reasoned that significant changes in the activity of the cloned promoters would result in a chromogenic change between 37°C and 40°C. This analysis in S. Paratyphi A indicated that while the fliC::lacZ reporter demonstrated dark blue color and the motA::lacZ reporter showed very bright color at both temperatures, the flhB::lacZ reporter exhibited clear interchanging temperature-dependent colony color, with a blue appearance at 37°C, but a colorless appearance at 40°C (Fig 2A). In contrast to S. Paratyphi A, flhB::lacZ expression in S. Typhimurium demonstrated similar blue color at both temperatures, suggesting comparable levels of promoter activity in this background (Fig 2B). Indeed, a quantitative β-galactosidase assay using S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures expressing the flhB::lacZ reporter demonstrated constant and high β-galactosidase activity in S. Typhimurium at both temperatures, but significantly lower expression in S. Paratyphi A at 40°C compared to its high activity at 37°C (Fig 2C), in agreement with the above RT-qPCR and proteomics data. Therefore, we chose to continue the subsequent screening with the flhB::lacZ reporter, which demonstrated temperature-dependent promoter activity that was reliably correlated with color changes in its colony appearance on LB-X-gal plates.

Fig 2. Construction of a temperature-responsive reporter system for the S. Paratyphi A motility regulon.

Fig 2

(A) The fliC, motA and flhB gene promotors from S. Paratyphi A 45157 were cloned upstream to the β-galactosidase gene (lacZY) in a low-copy number vector. S. Paratyphi A strains expressing the empty vector only (pMC1403) or each one of the three reporters were steaked onto LB/ X-gal agar plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C. Blue colonies indicate high expression of the promoters, while transparent colonies indicate low/no expression. (B) S. Typhimurium (STM) and S. Paratyphi A (SPA) strains expressing the reporter system flhB::lacZ were streaked onto LB/X-gal and incubated at 37°C and 40°C. Differences in the expression of this construct can be appreciated by the blue/ transparent color of the colonies developed under each condition (C) β-galactosidase specific activity derived from the expression of flhB::lacZ was quantified in S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures grown at 37°C and 40°C. The empty vector (pMC1403) was included as a negative control that shows the basal (leaky) lacZ expression. The mean of three biological repeatsis shown, while the error bars represent the SEM. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine the statistical significance between β-galactosidase activity at 37°C and 40°C.***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

Genetic screen to identify motility thermoregulators in S. Paratyphi A

Based on these results, we designed a genetic screen of a Tn-mutant library of a S. Paratyphi A strain harboring the flhB::lacZ reporter system. As the colonies of this reporter strain appeared transparent at 40°C, due to the repression of the flhB promoter, we expected to identify blue colonies in insertion mutants that would lose their repressing thermoregulation. A dense transposon library was generated by conjugating an Escherichia coli SM10 λ pir donor strain carrying the pJA1 plasmid into a nalidixic acid-resistant S. Paratyphi A strain, carrying the flhB::lacZ reporter system. pJA1 harbors an inducible mini-Tn10 transposon that has a decreased integration bias [15]. Transconjugant S. Paratyphi A cells were IPTG-induced and plated on X-gal LB agar plates under the selection of ampicillin (to select for the reporter plasmid), kanamycin (to select for the transposon), and nalidixic acid (to select for S. Paratyphi A) at 40°C. Overall, we screened 56,200 S. Paratyphi A Tn-mutant colonies in three independent screening rounds, which constitutes about 11-fold coverage of the S. Paratyphi A genome. Overall, twenty-three colonies with a blue color appearance at 40°C were selected for further characterization (Fig 3A). These clones were streaked on LB agar X-gal plates and incubated overnight at 37°C and 40°C for visual evaluation of their flhB::lacZ expression. Fifteen out of the twenty-three examined colonies maintained their blue color at both temperatures (Fig 3B), indicating a stable flhB::lacZ expression at elevated temperature and a possible loss of their motility thermoregulation. To further quantify the activity of the flhB::lacZ reporter in these mutants, we applied a quantitative β-galactosidase assay for mutants grown at 40°C and calculated the β-galactosidase activity in these mutants relative to its expression in the WT background. As shown in Fig 3C, in ten out of the fifteen Tn-mutants tested, we found an elevated β-galactosidase activity at 40°C compared to the WT, indicating an induced flhB promoter activity under conditions, in which it is normally repressed in the WT background. To confirm the possible loss of motility thermoregulation, we further analyzed their swimming motility on soft agar LB plates at 40°C vs. 37°C (Fig 3D-3E). Strikingly, we found that in eight out of the fifteen mutants examined (mutants 1–2, 3–2, 4–2, 8–2, 3–3, 9–3, 15–3, and 19–3), the flhB::lacZ expression and motility were significantly induced compared to the WT background at 40°C, consistent with a possible loss of their motility thermoregulation.

Fig 3. Genetic screen to identify motility thermoregulators in S. Paratyphi A.

Fig 3

(A) A dense mini-Tn10 transposon library in a S. Paratyphi A strain expressing flhB::lacZ was plated on LB/X-gal agar plates that were incubated at 40°C. Tn-mutants with induced flhB::lacZ expression were identified based on their blue appearance. (B) Twenty-three Tn-mutants that presented blue color at 40°C were passed onto LB/X-gal plates and incubated at 37°C and 40°C. Fifteen mutants that maintained high expression of flhB::lacZ at 40°C are indicated by black arrowheads. (C) The relative change in the β-galactosidase activity of the flhB::lacZ between the WT and fifteen Tn-mutants was determined at 40°C and is presented relative to the expression of flhB::lacZ in the WT background. Basal lacZ expression of S. Paratyphi A harboring pMC1403 (vector) was used as a negative control. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used to determine statistical significance in relation to S. Paratyphi A WT. *, P-value <0.05; **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant. (D) Fold change in swimming motility at 40°C relative to their motility at 37°C was calculated for the parental WT strain and its isogenic Tn-mutants. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to the S. Paratyphi A WT background. (E) Motility swimming of S. Paratyphi A WT and its fifteen isogenic Tn-mutants was determined on soft agar plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 5.5 h. Mutants that demonstrated higher motility at 40°C relative to the WT background are indicated by white arrows.

To identify the transposon insertion sites, we applied two-step PCR using mini-Tn10 transposon-specific and random primers (see Materials and Methods), followed by Sanger sequencing of the resulting amplicons. The identified Tn-mutated defective genes are listed in Table 1 and include genes from the Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI)-1 (hilE, invG, and sipD) and lysine- diaminopimelic acid (DAP) biosynthesis (dapD and dapB) regulons.

Table 1. Transposon mutants and insertion sites. The Tn insertion site of eight S. Paratyphi A mutants that presented loss of motility thermoregulation (Fig 3) was determined by Sanger sequencing. Mutant number, screen number, the affected genes, the insertion position of the Tn and their annotation are shown.

Mutant no. Screen no.1 Affected gene Insertion position2 Tn. direction Accession no. Description Note
1 2 sipD +970 3’ < -----5’ XBC73250.1 SPI-1 type III secretion system needle tip complex protein SipD Part of operon sipABCDA
3 2 hilE +259 5’----- > 3’ XBC75704.1 A negative regulator of HilD
4 2 yffB +63 5’----- > 3’ XBC75287.1 ArsC family reductase Part of operon yffB-dapD
8 2 hilE +347 3’ < -----5’ XBC75704.1 A negative regulator of HilD
3 3 invG +541 5’----- > 3’ XBC73235.1 type III secretion system outer membrane ring protein InvG Part of operon invHFGEABC
9 3 dapB -56 5’----- > 3’ XBC75575.1 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate reductase The entry site at the gene promotor
15 3 dgoT +80 5’----- > 3’ XBC76299.1 MFS transporter
19 3 dapB -56 5’----- > 3’ XBC75575.1 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate reductase The entry site at gene promotor

1No relevant mutants were found in screen number 1.

2Insertion position of the transposon from the first methionine codon of the hit ORF

To confirm the role of these genes in S. Paratyphi A motility thermoregulation, non-polar, in-frame deletions of dapB, invG, and hilE were constructed in a “clean” S. Paratyphi A 45157 background. While null mutations in dapB, invA, and invG were not confirmed to be involved in S. Paratyphi A motility thermoregulation, hilE deletion, which was hit twice at two different insertion sites, and at two orientations was shown to relieve motility suppression at 40°C to a similar extent as found in the Tn-mutants 3–2 and 8–2 (S2 Fig). We therefore concluded from these experiments that in S. Paratyphi A, HilE may play a role as a negative thermoregulator that represses S. Paratyphi A motility at elevated physiological temperatures.

HilE thermoregulates motility in S. Paratyphi A

To better understand the mechanism by which HilE affects thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A we studied the transcription of twenty-one motility-chemotaxis genes in S. Paratyphi A WT and ∆hilE null mutant strains grown at 40°C. We found that in the absence of HilE, most of the studied genes exhibited significantly higher transcription relative to the WT. Complementing ∆hilE from a low-copy number vector (pWSK29::hilE), largely downregulated the expression of the motility genes to similar levels as in the WT background (Fig 4A). In agreement, Western blot (WB) analysis using an α- S. Paratyphi A FliC antibody demonstrated higher levels of FliC in the absence of hilE at 37°C and 40°C compared to the WT background. Complementing ∆hilE expression ectopically resulted in decreased FliC expression to levels similar to or even lower than those found in the WT (Fig 4B). Finally, we examined the swimming motility phenotype at 37°C and 40°C. As shown in Fig 4C and 4D, while hilE deletion significantly increased S. Paratyphi A motility at 40°C, HilE complementation restored the swimming motility to similar levels as in the WT strain. These results indicated that HilE functions as a key thermoregulator in S. Paratyphi A by suppressing motility gene expression at elevated physiological temperatures.

Fig 4. HilE thermoregulates motility in S. Paratyphi A.

Fig 4

(A) Total RNA was extracted from S. Paratyphi A WT, ΔhilE, and ΔhilE expressing hilE from a low copy-number plasmid as a complemented strain (∆hilE/PhilE). RT-qPCR was used to determine changes in the expression of 21 flagellar-chemotaxis genes in the mutant strains relative to the WT background. The mean change in expression of three biological repeats is shown and its associated SEM is represented by the error bars. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to S. Paratyphi A WT. (B) S. Paratyphi A WT, its isogenic ∆hilE null mutant strains and ∆hilE complemented with either hilE (PhilE) or the vector (pWSK29) only were grown for 3 h at 37°C and 40°C to the late logarithmic phase, under aerobic conditions. The level of FliC at the cellular fraction was analyzed by Western Blotting using an anti- S. Paratyphi A FliC antibody. Ponceau S staining and the detection of a ~ 34 kDa cross-reacting band were used as loading controls. Quantification of the FliC band intensities relative to its intensity in the WT background at 37°C was calculated by ImageJ and is shown under the WB panel. (C) Swimming motility of the indicated S. Paratyphi A strains was evaluated on soft agar plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 6 h. (D) The fold change in the motility radius at 40°C vs. 37°C in at least three assays is shown. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to S. Paratyphi A WT. ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

HilE thermoregulates flhDC expression in a HilD-dependent manner

HilE was previously shown to negatively regulate HilD, the main transcriptional activator of SPI-1, by binding to HilD and preventing HilD homodimerization [16]. HilD homodimer is known to bind directly upstream to flhDC at promoter five (P5), in a way that activates flhDC transcription [17]. Based on this information, we hypothesized that in S. Paratyphi A, motility thermoregulation is mediated by HilE via HilD, in a way that prevents HilD from binding to the flhDC promoter and thereby inhibits the expression of the entire motility regulon. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a transcriptional fusion between the flhDC promoter and lacZ and studied how the absence of HilE and HilD affects flhDC transcription at 37°C and elevated physiological temperatures. As shown in Fig 5A, the expression of flhD::lacZ was lower in S. Paratyphi A when grown at 40°C compared to 37°C, by about 3-fold. Knocking out hilD resulted in a significant decrease in flhD::lacZ expression at 37°C, indicating that HilD is required for the transcription of the motility-chemotaxis master activator, FlhDC. Interestingly, a null ∆hilE deletion significantly increased flhD::lacZ expression at 37°C as well as at 40°C. However, a double deletion of ∆hilE hilD counteracted this upregulation and resulted in expression levels similar to the expression observed in the ∆hilD mutant strains (Fig 5A).

Fig 5. HilE thermoregulates flhDC expression in a HilD-dependent manner.

Fig 5

(A) β-galactosidase activity (shown in Miller Units) of S. Paratyphi A WT strain and its isogenic null mutant strains ∆hilE, ∆hilD and ∆hilE hilD harboring the flhD::lacZ reporting construct. Bacterial cultures were grown at 37°C and 40°C and assayed for β-galactosidase activity as explained in the Material and Methods section. Basal lacZ expression in S. Paratyphi A harboring the cloning vector pMC1403 (vector) was used as a negative control. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used to determine statistical significance relative to the WT at each temperature, and Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance between the WT strains grown at 37°C and 40°C. (B) Fold change in the transcription level of the flagellar genes flhD (class 1), flhB (class 2) and fliC (class 3) was determined in the S. Paratyphi A WT and its isogenic ∆hilE, ∆hilD and ∆hilE hilD mutant strains and normalized to the housekeeping gene 16S rRNA. Total RNA was extracted from cultures that were grown for 3 h at 37°C and 40°C to their late logarithmic phase, under aerobic conditions. The mean change in expression of three repeats is shown, with SEM represented by the error bars. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance in relation to S. Paratyphi A WT at 40°C. (C) The level of FliC at the cellular fraction was analyzed by Western Blotting, using an anti-SPA FliC antibody. Proteins were extracted from S. Paratyphi A WT and its isogenic ∆hilE, ∆hilD, and ∆hilE hilD null mutant strains that were grown at 37°C and 40°C as above. Ponceau S staining and the detection of a ~ 34kDa cross-reacting band were used as loading controls. The intensities of the FliC bands relative to its intensity in the WT background at 37°C is shown under the WB panel. (D) S. Paratyphi A WT, its isogenic null mutants (∆hilE, ∆hilD and ∆hilE hilD) and mutants strains complementing with hilE (PhilE), hilD (PhilD) or the cloning vector (pWSK29) only (P) were grown overnight at 37°C and then spotted on a soft agar plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 7 h. The fold change in their motility at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown, with the SEM represented by the error bars. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to the motility of S. Paratyphi A WT. *, P-value <0.05; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

Similarly, using RT-qPCR, we determined the transcriptional levels of flhD, flhB and fliC as representative genes from classes 1, 2, and 3 of the flagellar regulon, respectively. In agreement with the β-galactosidase results, RT-qPCR demonstrated that while the lack of hilE led to a significant increase in the expression of flhD, flhB and fliC at 40°C, the absence of both hilE and hilD negated this effect and caused a decrease in gene expression, to similar or even lower levels than the WT background (Fig 5B).

Western blotting, using α- S. Paratyphi A FliC antibody, further confirmed these results on the protein level and showed lower levels of FliC in the WT strain at 40°C compared to 37°C (about 20%). In the ∆hilE background the repressed expression of FliC at 40°C was largely relieved and the already high expression of FliC at 37°C was even further induced. In the absence of HilD, FliC expression decreased at both temperatures and the increase in FliC expression at 40°C in the absence of HilE was lost in the ∆hilE hilD background.

Finally, we studied the swimming motility phenotype at 37°C and 40°C. As shown in Fig 5D, while ∆hilE significantly elevated S. Paratyphi A motility, the ∆hilE hilD double mutant completely neutralized the effect of hilE deletion and displayed motility levels similar to those of the WT.

Accumulatively, we concluded from these experiments that the motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A is mediated by the repression of the motility-chemotaxis genes by HilE at elevated temperatures in a HilD-dependent manner, possibly via the interchanging binding of HilD to the flhDC promoter, which is regulated by the protein-protein interactions with HilE, as was shown previously [16].

HilE thermoregulates motility in other typhoidal Salmonella

Next, we asked whether motility thermoregulation characterizes other serovars of S. enterica. To that end, we studied the motility of five highly prevalent NTS (Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Infantis, Muenchen, and Newport) and four typhoidal (Typhi, Paratyphi A, Paratyphi B, and Sendai) at 37°C compared to 40°C. Remarkably, we found that while the motility of all studied NTS serovars increased at 40°C relative to 37°C, in the typhoidal serovars Paratyphi A, Typhi, and Sendai, but not Paratyphi B, swimming motility was reduced at 40°C relative to 37°C (Fig 6A). Repeating this experiment with a wider array of 16 NTS serovars and at 42°C (under the temperature our original observation was made [9]), further confirmed these results and demonstrated similar motility of all NTS serovars at 42°C and 37°C, but significantly impaired motility of typhoidal strains at the elevated temperature relative to 37°C (S3 Fig).

Fig 6. HilE thermoregulates motility in other typhoidal Salmonella.

Fig 6

(A) Prevalent NTS serovars (Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Infantis, Muenchen, and Newport) and typhoidal Salmonella serovars (Typhi, Paratyphi A, Paratyphi B, and Sendai) cultures were grown overnight at 37°C and then spotted on soft agar plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C. The motility radius was measured for S. Paratyphi B strains after 4.5 h; S. Enteritidis after 5 h; S. Muenchen and S. Newport after 5.5 h; S. Typhimurium and S. Infantis after 6 h; and S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi and S. Sendai after 7 h. The fold change in the motility radius at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown, while the error bars indicate the SEM. (B) WT and isogenic ∆hilE null mutant strains of S. Typhimurium, S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi, and S. Sendai were grown overnight at 37°C and spotted onto soft agar plates that were imaged after incubation at 37°C and 40°C. (C) The fold change in motility swimming at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown. The motility radius was measured for S. Typhimurium after 5 h; S. Paratyphi A 7 h; S. Sendai 8.5 h; and S. Typhi 12 h. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance between WT and its isogenic ∆hilE mutants. ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

We concluded from these results that motility thermoregulation is common to three typhoidal Salmonella serovars, but not to S. Paratyphi B, and that motility is not thermoregulated in the same way in NTS.

To investigate if the role that HilE plays in motility thermoregulation is unique to S. Paratyphi A or is common to other typhoidal serovars, we constructed a null non-polar hilE deletion in S. Typhi and S. Sendai. Comparing the swimming motility of the WT backgrounds to their isogenic ∆hilE mutants showed that the absence of HilE in serovars Paratyphi A, Typhi, and Sendai relieved motility suppression at 40°C and led to significantly increased swimming levels than the WT background at 40°C (Fig 6B and 6C). We concluded from these experiments that HilE plays a similar role as a motility thermoregulator in all three typhoidal Salmonella serovars, but not in S. Typhimurium, as an NTS representative serovar.

HilE affects S. Paratyphi A uptake by human macrophages at elevated temperatures

To place the above findings in a physiological context, we next studied the role of HilE in macrophage uptake. After crossing the epithelial gut barrier, Salmonella are taken up by phagocytic cells, including macrophages that disseminate the pathogen to systemic sites [18]. Given that macrophages are major players in early immunity to Salmonella and their response could influence the course of the infection, we sought to study the role of HilE in Salmonella uptake in THP-1 human macrophages. To this end, cultures of serovars Typhimurium, Paratyphi A, Typhi and Sendai grown overnight at 37°C and 40°C were used to infect differentiated THP-1 cells that were also incubated at 37°C or 40°C, at multiplicity of infection (MOI) ~10 (bacteria per macrophage). Two h post-infection (p.i.), the cells were washed, and gentamycin was added to kill extracellular Salmonella. In agreement with our [10] and other [19] previous studies, which showed a correlation between motility and macrophages uptake, we found that S. Typhimurium that presented elevated motility at 40 vs. 37°C, also showed increased macrophage uptake at the elevated temperature. In contrast, S. Paratyphi A that was motility-impaired at 40°C demonstrated decreased uptake under this condition compared to 37°C. To study the effect of HilE on Salmonella uptake we also compared Salmonella entry to macrophages by the WT and its ∆hilE isogenic mutant. Interestingly, we found that while the ∆hilE mutant in S. Typhimurium presented similar uptake to the WT background at both tested temperatures, the absence of HilE in S. Paratyphi A prominently improved its uptake by more than 10-fold at 40°C, but not at 37°C. Higher levels of macrophages uptake at elevated temperature were also identified in the HilE mutants of the other typhoidal serovars S. Typhi and S. Sendai, when we compared the uptake of their ∆hilE background to the WT at 40°C (Fig 7A). Nonetheless, these differences although reached statistical significance were less pronounced than in S. Paratyphi A, most likely due to their overall much slower motility at both temperatures (Fig 7B).

Fig 7. HilE controls S. Paratyphi A uptake by human macrophages at elevated temperature.

Fig 7

(A) Cultures of S. Typhimurium, S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi and S. Sendai and there isogenic hilE null mutant strains were grown at 37 or 40°C and were used to infect differentiated THP-1 human macrophage-like cells at MOI of ten at both temperatures. Salmonella uptake by THP-1 cells was determined using the gentamicin protection assay and calculated the percentage of the intracellular CFUs recovered at 2 h p.i from the total number of CFUs used to infect the cells. Bars present the mean value of six biological repeats and its calculated SEM. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to calculate statistical significance. (B) Overnight cultures of S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi and S. Sendai grown at 37°C were spotted on soft LB agar plates that were incubated at 37°C or 40°C. Swimming motility was photographed at 7 h post inoculation. (C) THP-1 human monocyte differentiated into macrophage-like cells were infected with S. Paratyphi A WT and its isogenic ∆fliC, ∆hilE and ∆hilE fliC null mutant strains at MOI of one. Bacterial uptake was determined as in (A). Columns show the mean of eight independent infections, with SEM represented by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance relative to S. Paratyphi A WT. *, P-value <0.05; **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

We hypothesized that the superior uptake of S. Paratyphi A in the ∆hilE mutant was mediated by its increased motility and/ or flagella overexpression at 40°C. To examine this possibility, we subsequently studied its uptake in a ∆fliC (encoding the structural protein of the flagella) mutant strain and at lower MOI of one. As expected, the lack of flagellin significantly reduced S. Paratyphi A uptake at 37°C and the ∆hilE fliC double mutant strain no longer demonstrated improved uptake at 40°C, as the ∆hilE mutant did (Fig 7C). Moreover, conducting these experiments with and without a mild centrifugation step indicated that centrifugation, although increased the overall uptake of the strains, did not change much the enhanced uptake of the ∆hilE mutant or the effect of the temperature (S4 Fig). These results suggested that the contribution of HilE in S. Paratyphi A uptake goes behind merely the improvement in bacteria motility and is likely connected to additional roles of the flagella in host cell interactions, such as flagella-mediated adherence [10,20].

Overall, we concluded from these experiments that HilE affects Salmonella interaction with human phagocytic cells and modulates typhoidal Salmonella virulence-associated phenotypes in a temperature-dependent manner. Under elevated temperature, the absence of hilE enhances flagella expression, motility and human macrophages uptake of S. Paratyphi A and possibly other typhoidal serovars.

Discussion

Bacterial motility represents a critical virulence-associated phenotype of many bacterial pathogens, providing the capacity to navigate toward favorable environments and away from hostile conditions [21]. This locomotive ability serves multiple functions essential for host-pathogen interactions, including chemotaxis toward nutrient sources, gaining access to host epithelial cells, colonization of preferred tissues, biofilm formation, and immune evasion [22–24].

In S. enterica, motility plays particularly crucial roles throughout the infection cycle as flagellar-mediated swimming is essential for Salmonella to penetrate the mucus layer protecting epithelial surfaces, facilitates the initial approach and attachment to intestinal epithelial cells, [25], and is required for Salmonella’s capacity to invade M cells in Peyer’s patches [26,27]. Therefore, previous studies have demonstrated that non-motile Salmonella mutant strains exhibit significantly attenuated virulence in both in vitro and in vivo models [19,28].

Due to the substantial metabolic investment required for flagella assembly and flagellar-mediated motility [29], Salmonella employs sophisticated mechanisms to modulate its motility in response to environmental cues encountered during host infection [8]. Current knowledge indicates that Salmonella interprets a diverse array of environmental signals to optimize flagellar expression and function. For example, oxygen availability significantly influences Salmonella motility, with aerobic conditions generally promoting flagellar expression through the ArcA/ArcB two-component system [30]. Other studies have demonstrated that changes in the intracellular pH [31] and the presence of short-chain fatty acids produced by the gut microbiota [32] also modulate Salmonella motility.

While most of these regulation studies have relied on S. Typhimurium as a model for the entire S. enterica species, previous reports from our group have shown differences in the way host cell invasion and motility are regulated between S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A [9,33,34]. These observations have also led us to speculate that a distinct regulatory setup of motility and invasion may be associated with the different lifestyles and disease manifestations caused by NTS vs. typhoidal serovars. One of the most striking differences we found was that under elevated physiological temperature (39–42°C), motility, epithelial cell invasion, and uptake by macrophages are markedly attenuated in all typhoidal Salmonella serovars, but not in NTS [10]. However, the molecular mechanism responsible for this dichotomy remained unknown. Here, we show that the impaired flagella-mediated motility of S. Paratyphi A under elevated temperature concurs with reduced transcription of multiple flagellar and chemotaxis genes from classes 1, 2, and 3, and lower expression of motility and chemotaxis proteins, as demonstrated by RT-qPCR, proteomics analyses, and motility assays on soft agar. Using an unbiased Tn mutagenesis approach in a S. Paratyphi A reporter strain, we found that HilE, a negative regulator of SPI-1 genes [35,36], plays a key role in the motility thermoregulation of S. Paratyphi A in a HilD-dependent manner. Since it has been previously shown that HilE regulates HilD activity through protein-protein interactions by preventing HilD homodimerization [16] and preventing its binding to the flhDC promoter [17], our working model suggests that motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A is based on the transient interaction of HilE with HilD. We speculate that in typhoidal Salmonella under high physiological temperatures, HilD binding to the flhDC promoter is inhibited by HilE with the possible involvement of other factors (see below) and the expression of the entire motility regulon is repressed (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Graphical model illustrating the role of HilE in Typhoidal Salmonella motility.

Fig 8

(Left Panel) at 37°C, the expression of FlhD is induced through the binding of HilD to the flhDC promoter. High expression of FlhDC leads to upregulation of the entire flagellar-motility regulon, Salmonella uptake by macrophages is facilitated and pathogen dissemination occurs. (Right panel) at elevated physiological temperature, the HilD-HilE interaction inhibits flhDC transcription and the flagellar-motility regulon is downregulated. Under these conditions, Salmonella uptake by macrophages is impaired, in a way that can restrict systemic dissemination of the pathogen.

A previous study has already reported the role of HilE in Salmonella pathogenicity and physiology by showing that HilE is required to reduce the growth cost imposed by the expression of HilD-regulated genes, and that HilE is necessary for successful intestinal colonization by S. Typhimurium [37]. HilE expression was also shown to be positively controlled by the virulence and motility regulators SirA/BarA [37] and FimZ [38], respectively, as well as by the H-NS antagonist LeuO [39]; it was also shown to be negatively controlled by the global carbohydrate metabolism regulator, Mlc [40]. Such complex and tight regulation of HilE highlights its central role in the global regulatory network of Salmonella.

Interestingly, thermoregulation by HilE was found to be common in the three typhoidal serovars (Typhi, Paratyphi A, and Sendai), but not in S. Paratyphi B, which did not exhibit a thermoregulated motility and presented a phenotype that was more similar to the motility behavior of the NTS serovars. While S. Paratyphi B infection can result in a systemic disease, this serovar can also cause a NTS-typical gastroenteritis disease in humans [41,42]. Moreover, previous mouse infection studies with S. Paratyphi B have shown that, unlike other typhoidal serovars, this pathogen can establish a lethal disease in mice following intraperitoneal infection, suggesting that S. Paratyphi B is less restricted to the human host than other enteric fever causing serovars [42]. Consistent with its classification as an atypical typhoidal serovar, our findings indicated that S. Paratyphi B (reference strains SARA 43 and SARA 44) regulates motility differently than the other typhoidal serovars Typhi, Paratyphi A, and Sendai. Furthermore, while HilE was shown to control thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella, our results demonstrated that HilE is not involved in thermoregulation in NTS serovars. This suggests that typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella utilize distinct regulatory mechanisms to coordinate their motility under physiologically relevant elevated body temperature. This difference may reflect adaptation to discrete infection strategies and host interactions in typhoidal vs. NTS strains.

During infection, Salmonella invades host macrophages, which serve as its preferred replicative niche and act as “Trojan horses” to transport the bacteria into systemic tissues [18]. Previous studies from our lab found that functional flagella are essential for Salmonella entry into phagocytic cells, as flagella-deficient mutants showed significantly reduced macrophage entry despite unchanged adherence [10]. Here, we showed that under elevated physiological temperatures, when the motility of typhoidal Salmonella is reduced, macrophage entry by S. Paratyphi A is also impaired; furthermore, the deletion of hilE, not only increased S. Paratyphi A motility, but also enhanced its uptake by human macrophages at 40°C. Since motility thermoregulation by HilE was found to be common to serovars Paratyphi A, Typhi, and Sendai, but not to prevalent NTS strains, it is tempting to suggest that HilE plays a role in directing typhoidal Salmonella infection during the acute phase of the disease. At this stage of the infection, when fever symptoms are presented and the body temperature of enteric fever patients reaches 39–40°C, typhoidal Salmonella are typically already present in the blood stream and in systemic sites. Pathogen response to this cue and subsequent repression of its motility and flagellin expression can lower its own immunogenic signature and detection by Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR-5)-expressing cells [43]. However, additional benefits could be a reduced entry into phagocytic cells and limiting excessive spread to systemic sites, while supporting intestinal residing, which facilitate shedding and transmission.

It is interesting to note that a similar phenotype of temperature-dependent down-regulation of flagellar motility and a role in pathogenicity has also been described in Listeria monocytogenes [44] that shares with Salmonella a similar lifestyle as a facultative intracellular pathogen. Although, the underlying mechanism responsible for the motility thermoregulation in both bacteria is very different, this can provide an intriguing example of convergent evolution of pathogen adaptation to its human host.

The relationship between motility and virulence in Salmonella extends beyond mere locomotion. Several regulatory proteins, including FlhD, FlhC, and FliZ, function as dual regulators of both flagellar biosynthesis and virulence gene expression [45–47]. This regulatory crosstalk creates a coordinated network linking motility with virulence programs, particularly those governed by the SPIs. Our findings highlight prominent regulatory differences between typhoidal and NTS and reveal the key role of HilE in motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella. Moreover, these results show how HilE-mediated thermoregulation affects flagellin expression, flagella-mediated motility, and uptake by macrophages, in a way that may fine-tune the dissemination of typhoidal Salmonella to systemic sites by macrophages [48] and innate immune response facilitated by TLR-5 signaling [43], under febrile disease conditions.

Although we showed that HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A, but not in S. Typhimurium, it is likely that additional factor than merely HilE is involved in this regulatory pathway. In other words, we believe that HilE is required, but not sufficient to coordinate motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A. This hypothesis is based on the observation that HilD share the same sequence in S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium (S5A Fig), HilE in S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium although not identical is highly conserved (S5B Fig) and that swapping HilE from S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium was not sufficient to change motility thermoregulation in either serovar (S5C Fig).

Interestingly, a deletion of a small 49-bp region at the P5 flhDC promoter, downstream to the HilD binding site, we named CITRE (standing for cis thermoregulatory element; S6A Fig) has also led to the loss of motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A, but not in S. Typhimurium as did the absence of HilE, on the transcriptional level (S6B Fig), protein level (S6C Fig) and phenotypic level (S6D Fig). Because CITRE was predicted to contain two binding sites of the nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS, known to act as a transcriptional repressor [49] and as a HilD antagonist [50], we speculate that additional regulatory factors (possibly H-NS), which binds to this loci, are also required in conjunction with HilE to orchestrate motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A.

Future research in this direction is expected to shed light on the involvement of H-NS in motility regulation in S. Paratyphi A, and reveal how HilE-HilD interaction changes under different physiological temperatures. It is also of interest to further study how other genes identified in the transposon screen (dapB, dapE), involved in the lysine/ diaminopimelate (DAP) biosynthetic pathway, may contribute to motility thermoregulation of typhoidal Salmonella. Additional mechanistic insights into motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella will improve our understanding of the strategies employed by this pathogen in adaptation to the human host and illuminate how this behavior contributes to the development of enteric fever.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S1 Table. Bacterial cultures were routinely maintained in Lennox Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. When appropriate, the medium was supplemented with antibiotics in the following concentrations: kanamycin, 50 µg/ml; ampicillin, 100 µg/ml; and nalidixic acid, 20 µg/ml. For the lacZ reporter screens 40 µg/ml of 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) and 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were spread onto LB-agar plates.

Molecular biology and cloning

All primers used in this study are listed in S2 Table. Oligonucleotides were purchased from IDT and PCR was carried out using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs) or with Red Load Taq Master (Larova). None-polar ∆hilE, ∆hilD, ∆dapB and ∆fliC null mutants and a 49-bp deletion of CITRE sequence in various S. enterica backgrounds were constructed using the λ Red–mediated recombination system and the resistance cassette was then eliminated from the genome by using a helper plasmid encoding the FLP recombinase [51]. For complementation of ∆hilE and ∆hilD in S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium, the intact sequence was PCR amplified using gDNA from S. Paratyphi A 45157 and S. Typhimurium SL1344 respectively as a template. The obtained amplicons of hilE and hilD resulted in 815 and 1245 bp amplicons, respectively that included their native regulatory regions. hilE was amplified using primers “hilE SacI F” and “hilE BamHI R”. hilD was amplified using primers “hilD SacI F” and “hilD BamHI R”, both fragments were digested with SacI and BamHI and cloned into the low copy-number vector, pWSK29. To construct the motility reporter systems the flhB, fliC, motA and flhD promoters were PCR amplified using S. Paratyphi A 45157 gDNA as a template, which resulted in 219, 379, 153, and 730-bp DNA fragments that included their native upstream regulatory regions and the first 7–9 amino acid codons of the target gene. The promoter of flhB was amplified using primers “flhBp SmaI F” and “flhBp BamHI R”; fliC with “fliCp SmaI F” and “fliCp BamHI R”; motA with the primers “motAp SmaI F” and “motAp BamHI R”; and flhD was amplified with the primers “flhDp SmaI F” and “flhDp BamHI R”. All fragments were digested with SmaI and BamHI and cloned into pMC1403 upstream to a promoterless lacZY gene.

Transposon insertion library

A Tn10 transposon mutagenesis library was constructed in a nalidixic acid resistant S. Paratyphi A 45157 strain, harboring the motility reporter system flhB::lacZ cloned in pMC1403. The transposon library was generated by conjugating the pJA1 plasmid harboring a mini-Tn10 transposon containing a kanamycin resistance marker and a very low insertional bias [52]. pJA1 plasmid was conjugated into the recipient S. Paratyphi A strain, using an E. coli SM10 λ pir as the donor strain. Transconjugant cells were selected and induced overnight in LB supplemented with 0.8 M IPTG and plated on LB agar plates supplemented with X-gal and ampicillin (to select for reporter plasmid), kanamycin (to select for the transposon) and nalidixic acid (to select for the recipient S. Paratyphi A strain). The plates were then incubated at 40°C and blue colonies that indicated induced expression of flhB::lacZ were selected for further phenotypic characterization.

Identification of the transposon insertion sites

Ttransposon insertion sites were determined by two stages of PCR amplification according to [52] with the following modifications. DNA flanking the insertion sites was amplified using GoTaq DNA Polymerase (Promega) in a reaction buffer containing 25 mM MgCl2, using a primer that binds the middle part of the kanamycin resistance gene in pJA1 (primer nptII_A) and an ‘arbitrary’ primer that randomly binds in the genome (primer 1366-Arb-1B). The PCR protocol included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of: 92°C for 15 s, 38°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, and a final elongation step of 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were treated with exonuclease I (New England Biolabs), and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 15 min then inactivated at 85°C for 15 min. Then, a second PCR step was applied using the transposon-specific primer nptII_B that binds just downstream of the nptIIA primer and the 1368-Arb-1 primer, which binds to primer 1366-Arb-1B, used in step 1. A second PCR amplification included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 92°C for 15 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The obtained amplicons ranged between 200 and 1500 bp were purified from 1% agarose gel, using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel) and subjected to a Sanger sequencing, using the nptII_C primer.

β-galactosidase assays

S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium strains expressing the flhB::lacZ or the flhD::lacZ reporter constructs were grown in LB supplemented with ampicillin overnight at 37°C, subcultured (1:100) and grown under aerobic conditions for 3 h at 37°C or 40°C. To determine the β galactosidase specific activity 500 µl of cultures were added to 500 µl Z-Buffer (0.06 M Na2HPO4·7H2O, 0.04 M NaH2PO4·H2O, 0.01 M KCl, 0.001 M MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.05 M β-mercaptoethanol; pH 7) and assayed as detailed in [53], using o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG, Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A cultures were grown overnight at 37°C, subcultured (1:100 dilution) and grown under aerobic conditions for 3 h at 37°C or 40°C. RNA was extracted from 400 µl of cultures using the RNA protect Bacteria Reagent (QIAGEN) and RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To diminish any genomic DNA contamination, RNA was treated with TURBO DNA-free Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quantity and quality of the extracted RNA were determined by Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was synthesized using qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta-bio) in a T100 thermal cycler by (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Real-Time PCR reactions were performed in a StepOne Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems) instrument. Each reaction was carried out in a total volume of 20 µl in a 96-well optical reaction plate (Applied Biosystems). Melting curve analysis verified that each reaction amplified a single PCR product. Data were normalized to the housekeeping gene 16S rRNA and analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCT method [54].

Motility assay

Ten µL of overnight Salmonella cultures grown in LB broth at 37°C were placed onto 0.3% agar LB plates, the plates were incubated for 4.5–12 h at 37°C or 40°C without being inverted. The motility radius was measured with a ruler and imaged using a Fusion Solo X system (Vilber).

Western blotting

Overnight cultures grown in LB at 37°C were diluted 1:100 and subcultured for 3 h at 37°C or 40°C under aerobic conditions. The cultures were OD600 normalized, centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in 100 μL of 1 × sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer (0.15 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 10% 2-Mercaptoethanol, 1.2% SDS, 30% Glycerol, 0.04% Bromophenol blue). Boiled samples were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as we previously described [55]. Blots were probed with custom (Cusabio) polyclonal anti- S. Paratyphi A FliC antibody (diluted 1: 30,000) that were raised in rabbits against polypeptide synthetized based on the S. Paratyphi A FliC sequence (XBC74829.1). Goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Abcam; ab6721, diluted 1: 3,000) was used as a secondary antibody, followed by detection with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Bio-Rad Laboratories). For a loading control, membrane was submersed for 10‐30 seconds in 100% methanol, briefly rinsed in dH20 and stained with Ponceau S solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Stained membranes were then destained with dH20 and imaged using the Fusion solo X system (Vilber). Bands densitometry was determined by Image J as explained in [56].

Mass spectrometry

S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium cultures were grown in LB for overnight at 37°C and then subcultured 1:100 and grown for 3 h at 37°C or 40°C. Bacterial culture aliquots (1 ml) were centrifuged at 10,000 g, washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 5% SDS, 100 mM TRIS and 10 mM DL-dithiothreitol (DTT). Mass spectrometry analysis was carried out at the Smoler Proteomic Center at the Technion, Haifa, Israel. Protein samples were re-boiled at 95°C for 5 minutes, sonicated, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes. Precipitation was performed using cold 80% acetone, and protein pellets were dissolved in 8.5 M Urea, 400 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and 10 mM DTT. Proteins were reduced, alkylated with iodoacetamide, and digested with trypsin (Promega) overnight at 37°C, followed by a second digestion for 4 h. Peptides were desalted using C18 StageTips, dried, and resuspended in 0.1% formic acid with 2% acetonitrile. The resulted peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) using a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) fitted with a capillary HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were loaded in solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) on a homemade capillary column (30 cm, 75-micron ID) packed with Reprosil C18-Aqua (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany). The peptides mixture was resolved with a 6–30% linear gradient of solvent B (80% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) for 180 minutes followed by gradient of 15 minutes of 28–95% and 15 minutes at 95% solvent B at flow rates of 0.15 μl/min. Mass spectrometry was performed in a positive mode using repetitively full MS scan followed by high collision dissociation high collision dissociation (HCD) and dynamic exclusion.

The mass spectrometry data was analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.4 (Thermo) using Sequest search engine, searching against the S. Typhimurium (strain SL1344) and S. Paratyphi A (strain 45157) proteomes from the Uniprot database with mass tolerance of 20 ppm for the precursor masses and 0.02 Da for the fragment ions. Oxidation on methionine, and protein N-terminus acetylation were accepted as variable modifications and carbamidomethyl on cysteine was accepted as static modifications. Minimal peptide length was set to six amino acids and a maximum of two miscleavages was allowed. The data was quantified by label free analysis using the same software. Peptide- level false discovery rates (FDRs) were filtered to 1% using the target-decoy strategy.

Human macrophages uptake assay

Human macrophages (THP-1) were obtained from ATCC and seeded at 2.5 × 105 and 1.2 × 106 cells/well in a 24-well and 6-well tissue culture dish, respectively. To differentiate THP-1 monocytes into macrophage-like cells, THP-1 cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 0.1 mM MEM non-essential amino acids solution, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich). After 24 h, cells were washed and incubated in the same medium without PMA for additional 48 h. THP-1 infection experiments were carried using the gentamicin protection assay, as described elsewhere [57]. Briefly, differentiated THP-1 were infected with S. Typhimurium, S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi and S. Sendai cultures that were grown in LB broth overnight at 37°C or 40°C under aerobic conditions, at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1–10. A mild centrifugation force (500 g for 5 min at 25°C) was applied immediately after bacteria were added the cells to synchronize the infection. Infected cells were subsequently incubated at 37°C or 40°C, and at 30 min post infection the cells were washed with PBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ and further incubated in medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml gentamicin. At 2 h p.i. cells were washed and lysed with lysis buffer (1% Triton X- 100, 0.1% SDS in PBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+). S. Typhimurium, S. Paratyphi A, S. Typhi and S. Sendai uptake was determined by calculating the number of intracellular colony forming units (CFUs) at 2 h p.i. divided by the number of infecting bacteria.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The flagella-chemotaxis regulation in S. Paratyphi A.

(A) The motility-chemotaxis regulon in Salmonella is organized in three hierarchical transcriptional classes. The class 1 operon contains the flhD and flhC genes that together encode the master regulator of flagella-chemotaxis regulon, FlhDC. The heteromultimeric complex (FlhD4C2) is positioned at the top of this hierarchy and activates the transcription of class 2 operons. Class 2 genes responsible for basal body assembly. Following the assembly of the early flagellar basal body, the repressor FlgM is exported from the cell, releasing the class 3 transcription factor σ28 (FliA). This activates the expression of class 3 genes, leading to the completion of the hook and filament assembly. The positive regulators HilD, FliZ, FlhDC and FliA are shown in green, while the negative regulators involved FliT and FlgM are shown in red. Motility genes that were analyzed by RT-qPCR in Fig. 1A are shown in magenta. Genes that are inactivated in S. Paratyphi A are shown in light grey. (B) Graphical illustration of the flagella structure. Proteins that were detected by the MS analysis in Fig. 1B are shown in purple.

(PDF)

ppat.1013133.s001.pdf (462.9KB, pdf)
S2 Fig. Reconstruction null deletion in hilE, invA, invG, and dapB and their effect on S. Paratyphi A motility.

(A) S. Paratyphi A WT and its isogenic null mutant strains ΔhilE, ΔinvG, ΔinvA and ΔdapD were grown overnight at 37°C, spotted onto soft agar plates and incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 5.5 h. The fold change motility at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown, while SEM is represented by the error bars. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance in relation to S. Paratyphi A WT. (B) Swimming motility on soft agar plates of S. Paratyphi A WT, its isogenic ΔhilE strain and two transposon insertion mutants in hilE (clones 3–2 and 8–2). All strains were grown overnight at 37°C and then 10 µl from each culture were spotted on soft agar LB plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 5.5 h. (C) The motility radius of the strains was measured and their fold change in motility at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to S. Paratyphi A WT. *, P-value <0.05; **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

(TIF)

ppat.1013133.s002.tif (838.8KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Motility thermoregulation is not common among NTS serovars.

The motility of three typhoidal (Typhi, Paratyphi A, and Sendai) and 16 NTS serovars was measured on semisolid LB agar plates at 37°C and 42°C. The mean change in the motility between 42°C and 37°C is shown. Bars represent the mean of 2–3 independent experiments and SEM is indicated by the error bars.

(PDF)

ppat.1013133.s003.pdf (13.1KB, pdf)
S4 Fig. S. Paratyphi A uptake by THP-1 macrophages with and without application of a mild centrifugation.

Cultures of S. Paratyphi A (WT and its isogenic hilE and fliC mutants) were grown at 37 or 40°C and were used to infect differentiated THP-1 human macrophage-like cells at MOI of five at both temperatures. Salmonella uptake by THP-1 cells was determined using the gentamicin protection assay and calculated the percentage of the intracellular CFUs recovered at 2 h p.i from the total number of CFUs used to infect the cells. Bars present the mean value four biological repeats and thier calculated SEM. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to calculate statistical significance.

(PDF)

ppat.1013133.s004.pdf (14.1KB, pdf)
S5 Fig. Swapping HilE between S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium does not alter motility thermoregulation.

(A) The 310 amino acid protein sequence of HilD in S. Typhimurium strain SL1344 (accession number CBW18953.1) and its ortholog in S. Paratyphi A strain 45157 (accession number QWV88109.1) were aligned using CLUSTALW. Alignment image of the amino acid identity was created by the BoxShade tool (https://junli.netlify.app/apps/boxshade/) and show complete identity at the protein level between these two orthologues. (B) 177 amino acids of the HilE protein in S. Typhimurium strain SL1344 (accession number CBW20528.1) and its ortholog in S. Paratyphi A strain 45157 (accession number QWV89528.1) were aligned and presented as above. Three divergent amino acids between these serovars are highlighted. (C) S. Typhimurium strains including WT, ∆hilE, ∆hilE complemented with the empty vector (∆hilE/P), hilE from S. Typhimurium (∆hilE/hilESTM) or hilE from S. Paratyphi A (∆hilE/hilESPA); and S. Paratyphi A strains including WT, ∆hilE, and ∆hilE complemented with the empty vector (∆hilE/P), hilE from S. Paratyphi A (∆hilE/hilESPA) or S. Typhimurium (∆hilE/hilESTM) were grown at 37°C aerobically for overnight. Ten µl from each culture were spotted on soft LB agar plates that were incubated at 37°C or 40°C for 4 h before imaging.

(PDF)

ppat.1013133.s005.pdf (457.3KB, pdf)
S6 Fig. Identification of a CIS thermoregulatory element (CITRE) contributes to motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A.

(A) The genetic organization of the flhDC promotor is shown. HilD binding site is presented according to Singer et al. [17]. Black arrows indicate the six flhDC transcription start sites, while their -10 promoter elements are indicated by a closed box, as reported by Yanagihara et al. [58]. The HilD binding site is highlighted in blue and the identified 49-bp CITRE element is marked by a green bar, overlapping with two putative H-NS binding sites predicted by PRODORIC (https://www.prodoric.de) that are shown as orange boxes. (B) WT S. Typhimurium, WT S. Paratyphi A, and their isogenic strains harboring a 49-bp deletion of the CITRE element (∆CITRE) were subcultured in LB grown for 3 h at 37°C and 40°C and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. Fold change in the expression of five flagellar genes (flhD, fliL, flgK, motA, and fliC) at 40°C relative to their expression at 37°C is shown as the mean value of three biological replicates, with SEM represented by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance between the WT background and its isogenic ∆CITRE mutant. (C) The level of FliC at the cellular fraction was analyzed by Western blotting using a S. Paratyphi A anti-FliC antibody. Ponceau S staining and the detection of a ~ 34 kDa cross-reacting band were used as loading controls. FliC expression in the ∆CITRE strain, relative to its expression in the WT background at 37°C, is presented by numerical values below the WB. (D) Cultures of the above strains were spotted onto soft agar plates that were incubated at 37 and 40°C, for 5.5 h. The fold change in motility at 40°C relative to 37°C is shown, while SEM is represented by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance. **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

(TIF)

ppat.1013133.s006.tif (1.3MB, tif)
S1 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

(DOCX)

ppat.1013133.s007.docx (36.7KB, docx)
S2 Table. Primers used in this study.

(DOCX)

ppat.1013133.s008.docx (18.9KB, docx)
S3 Table. The numerical values used to build graphs.

(XLSX)

ppat.1013133.s009.xlsx (33.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. George Church from the Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School for the kind gift of the EPEC SM10λpir strain harboring the pJA1 transposon plasmid. We are thankful to Dr. Nikki Freed from University of Auckland for helpful communication and practical suggestions regarding the identification of transposon insertion sites. We thank Dr. Dana Elhadad for laying the foundation to this study and her contribution to the motility assays. We are also grateful to Shani Shem-Tov for her valuable help with the artwork, and for Dr. Dor Salomon for critical reading on the manuscrpt.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The work at the Gal-Mor laboratory was supported by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF) under grant number I-41-416.6-2018; the Research Cooperation Lower Saxony – Israel (The Volkswagen Foundation) under grant number A128055; and the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) under grant numbers 2616/18 and 1228/23 awarded to O.G.M. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Gal-Mor O. Persistent Infection and Long-Term Carriage of Typhoidal and Nontyphoidal Salmonellae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(1):e00088-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00088-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knodler LA, Elfenbein JR. Salmonella enterica. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(11):964–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Roggentin P, Mikoleit M, Guibourdenche M, de Pinna E, Nair S, et al. Supplement 2008-2010 (no. 48) to the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme. Res Microbiol. 2014;165(7):526–30. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gal-Mor O, Boyle EC, Grassl GA. Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars differ. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:391. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng RA, Eade CR, Wiedmann M. Embracing Diversity: Differences in Virulence Mechanisms, Disease Severity, and Host Adaptations Contribute to the Success of Nontyphoidal Salmonella as a Foodborne Pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1368. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnson R, Mylona E, Frankel G. Typhoidal Salmonella: Distinctive virulence factors and pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20(9):e12939. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wain J, Hendriksen RS, Mikoleit ML, Keddy KH, Ochiai RL. Typhoid fever. Lancet. 2015;385(9973):1136–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62708-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anderson JK, Smith TG, Hoover TR. Sense and sensibility: flagellum-mediated gene regulation. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18(1):30–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elhadad D, McClelland M, Rahav G, Gal-Mor O. Feverlike Temperature is a Virulence Regulatory Cue Controlling the Motility and Host Cell Entry of Typhoidal Salmonella. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(1):147–56. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elhadad D, Desai P, Rahav G, McClelland M, Gal-Mor O. Flagellin Is Required for Host Cell Invasion and Normal Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 Expression by Salmonella enterica Serovar Paratyphi A. Infect Immun. 2015;83(9):3355–68. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00468-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Frye J, Karlinsey JE, Felise HR, Marzolf B, Dowidar N, McClelland M, et al. Identification of new flagellar genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(6):2233–43. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.6.2233-2243.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Apel D, Surette MG. Bringing order to a complex molecular machine: the assembly of the bacterial flagella. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(9):1851–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Santis O, Kilowoko M, Kyungu E, Sangu W, Cherpillod P, Kaiser L, et al. Predictive value of clinical and laboratory features for the main febrile diseases in children living in Tanzania: A prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0173314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petersiel N, Shresta S, Tamrakar R, Koju R, Madhup S, Shresta A, et al. The epidemiology of typhoid fever in the Dhulikhel area, Nepal: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Freed NE. Creation of a Dense Transposon Insertion Library Using Bacterial Conjugation in Enterobacterial Strains Such As Escherichia Coli or Shigella flexneri. J Vis Exp. 2017;(127):56216. doi: 10.3791/56216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Joiner JD, Steinchen W, Mozer N, Kronenberger T, Bange G, Poso A, et al. HilE represses the activity of the Salmonella virulence regulator HilD via a mechanism distinct from that of intestinal long-chain fatty acids. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(12):105387. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singer HM, Kühne C, Deditius JA, Hughes KT, Erhardt M. The Salmonella Spi1 virulence regulatory protein HilD directly activates transcription of the flagellar master operon flhDC. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(7):1448–57. doi: 10.1128/JB.01438-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tam MA, Rydström A, Sundquist M, Wick MJ. Early cellular responses to Salmonella infection: dendritic cells, monocytes, and more. Immunol Rev. 2008;225:140–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00679.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Olsen JE, Hoegh-Andersen KH, Casadesús J, Rosenkranzt J, Chadfield MS, Thomsen LE. The role of flagella and chemotaxis genes in host pathogen interaction of the host adapted Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin compared to the broad host range serovar S. Typhimurium. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rossez Y, Wolfson EB, Holmes A, Gally DL, Holden NJ. Bacterial flagella: twist and stick, or dodge across the kingdoms. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(1):e1004483. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akahoshi DT, Bevins CL. Flagella at the Host-Microbe Interface: Key Functions Intersect With Redundant Responses. Front Immunol. 2022;13:828758. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.828758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chaban B, Hughes HV, Beeby M. The flagellum in bacterial pathogens: For motility and a whole lot more. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;46:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Duan Q, Zhou M, Zhu L, Zhu G. Flagella and bacterial pathogenicity. J Basic Microbiol. 2013;53(1):1–8. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Josenhans C, Suerbaum S. The role of motility as a virulence factor in bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;291(8):605–14. doi: 10.1078/1438-4221-00173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ibarra JA, Steele-Mortimer O. Salmonella--the ultimate insider. Salmonella virulence factors that modulate intracellular survival. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(11):1579–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01368.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jones BD, Lee CA, Falkow S. Invasion by Salmonella typhimurium is affected by the direction of flagellar rotation. Infect Immun. 1992;60(6):2475–80. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.6.2475-2480.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rivera-Chávez F, Lopez CA, Zhang LF, García-Pastor L, Chávez-Arroyo A, Lokken KL, et al. Energy Taxis toward Host-Derived Nitrate Supports a Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1-Independent Mechanism of Invasion. mBio. 2016;7(4):e00960-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00960-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schmitt CK, Darnell SC, O’Brien AD. The attenuated phenotype of a Salmonella typhimurium flgM mutant is related to expression of FliC flagellin. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(10):2911–5. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.10.2911-2915.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mitchell JG. The energetics and scaling of search strategies in bacteria. Am Nat. 2002;160(6):727–40. doi: 10.1086/343874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Evans MR, Fink RC, Vazquez-Torres A, Porwollik S, Jones-Carson J, McClelland M, et al. Analysis of the ArcA regulon in anaerobically grown Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Minamino T, Imae Y, Oosawa F, Kobayashi Y, Oosawa K. Effect of intracellular pH on rotational speed of bacterial flagellar motors. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(4):1190–4. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.4.1190-1194.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lamas A, Regal P, Vázquez B, Cepeda A, Franco CM. Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonellaenterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019;8(4):265. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Elhadad D, Desai P, Grassl GA, McClelland M, Rahav G, Gal-Mor O. Differences in Host Cell Invasion and Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 Expression between Salmonella enterica Serovar Paratyphi A and Nontyphoidal S. Typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2016;84(4):1150–65. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01461-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cohen H, Hoede C, Scharte F, Coluzzi C, Cohen E, Shomer I, et al. Intracellular Salmonella Paratyphi A is motile and differs in the expression of flagella-chemotaxis, SPI-1 and carbon utilization pathways in comparison to intracellular S. Typhimurium. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(4):e1010425. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paredes-Amaya CC, Valdés-García G, Juárez-González VR, Rudiño-Piñera E, Bustamante VH. The Hcp-like protein HilE inhibits homodimerization and DNA binding of the virulence-associated transcriptional regulator HilD in Salmonella. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(17):6578–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grenz JR, Cott Chubiz JE, Thaprawat P, Slauch JM. HilE Regulates HilD by Blocking DNA Binding in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2018;200(8):e00750-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00750-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pérez-Morales D, Nava-Galeana J, Rosales-Reyes R, Teehan P, Yakhnin H, Melchy-Pérez EI, et al. An incoherent feedforward loop formed by SirA/BarA, HilE and HilD is involved in controlling the growth cost of virulence factor expression by Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(5):e1009630. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baxter MA, Jones BD. The fimYZ genes regulate Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium invasion in addition to type 1 fimbrial expression and bacterial motility. Infect Immun. 2005;73(3):1377–85. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1377-1385.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Espinosa E, Casadesús J. Regulation of Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) by the LysR-type regulator LeuO. Mol Microbiol. 2014;91(6):1057–69. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lim S, Yun J, Yoon H, Park C, Kim B, Jeon B, et al. Mlc regulation of Salmonella pathogenicity island I gene expression via hilE repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(6):1822–32. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fidler K, Dudley J, Cloke R, Nicholls M, Greig DR, Dallman TJ, et al. Salmonella Paratyphi B; Public Health and Parental Choice: When to Treat Asymptomatic Carriers of Infection? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(10):e374–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Higginson EE, Ramachandran G, Hazen TH, Kania DA, Rasko DA, Pasetti MF, et al. Improving Our Understanding of Salmonella enterica Serovar Paratyphi B through the Engineering and Testing of a Live Attenuated Vaccine Strain. mSphere. 2018;3(6):e00474-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00474-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Uematsu S, Akira S. Immune responses of TLR5(+) lamina propria dendritic cells in enterobacterial infection. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(8):803–11. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0094-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kamp HD, Higgins DE. A protein thermometer controls temperature-dependent transcription of flagellar motility genes in Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(8):e1002153. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chubiz JEC, Golubeva YA, Lin D, Miller LD, Slauch JM. FliZ regulates expression of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 invasion locus by controlling HilD protein activity in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(23):6261–70. doi: 10.1128/JB.00635-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hamed S, Wang X, Shawky RM, Emara M, Aldridge PD, Rao CV. Synergistic action of SPI-1 gene expression in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium through transcriptional crosstalk with the flagellar system. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1583-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mouslim C, Hughes KT. The effect of cell growth phase on the regulatory cross-talk between flagellar and Spi1 virulence gene expression. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1003987. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Petersen E, Miller SI. The cellular microbiology of Salmonellae interactions with macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21(11):e13116. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dorman CJ, Kane KA. DNA bridging and antibridging: a role for bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins in regulating the expression of laterally acquired genes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(3):587–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00155.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Martínez LC, Banda MM, Fernández-Mora M, Santana FJ, Bustamante VH. HilD induces expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 genes by displacing the global negative regulator H-NS from ssrAB. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(21):3746–55. doi: 10.1128/JB.01799-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Freed NE, Bumann D, Silander OK. Combining Shigella Tn-seq data with gold-standard E. coli gene deletion data suggests rare transitions between essential and non-essential gene functionality. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0818-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aviv G, Gal-Mor O. lacZ Reporter System as a Tool to Study Virulence Gene Regulation in Bacterial Pathogens. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1734:39–45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7604-1_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aviv G, Gal-Mor O. Western Blotting Against Tagged Virulence Determinants to Study Bacterial Pathogenicity. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1734:47–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7604-1_6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shem-Tov R, Gal-Mor O. Profiling of Secreted Type 3 Secretion System Substrates by Salmonella enterica. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2427:47–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1971-1_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gal-Mor O, Suez J, Elhadad D, Porwollik S, Leshem E, Valinsky L, et al. Molecular and cellular characterization of a Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi a outbreak strain and the human immune response to infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(2):146–56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05468-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yanagihara S, Iyoda S, Ohnishi K, Iino T, Kutsukake K. Structure and transcriptional control of the flagellar master operon of Salmonella typhimurium. Genes Genet Syst. 1999;74(3):105–11. doi: 10.1266/ggs.74.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Matthew Wolfgang

4 Jun 2025

PPATHOGENS-D-25-00929

HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella serovars at elevated physiological temperatures

PLOS Pathogens

Dear Dr. Gal-Mor,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 30 days Aug 03 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andreas J Baumler

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Matthew Wolfgang

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Rivka Shem-Tov, and Ohad Gal-Mor. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list.

3) Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOSu2019s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOSu2019s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility. Once you have responded and addressed all other outstanding technical requirements, you may resubmit your manuscript within Editorial Manager. 

Potential Copyright Issues:

- Please confirm (a) that you are the photographer of Figures 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4C, 7B, and S2B., or (b) provide written permission from the photographer to publish the photo(s) under our CC BY 4.0 license.

4) Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well.

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This manuscript describes in an over complicated fashion the mechanistic explanation for a previously recognised thermoregulation of flagellar gene expression in Salmonella serovars. Embedded deep in this dialogue is a further interesting observation with respect to the impact the thermoregulation has upon macrophage uptake. This second observation is in some essence more important than defining the role HilE plays in controlling flagellar gene expression. It is the combination of these two points that I can understand why the authors have submitted this paper. However, from my point of view as a reviewer there is substantial work to be done on the data presentation to allow a reader to easily follow their rationale for the experiments performed and the analysis of their data.

I am, however, confident that the authors can recognise the constructive approach of this review and in doing so generate a nice narrative of two/three observations for Salmonella as a species. They show that HilE controls thermoregulation of S. Paratyphi, not all serovars exhibit this phenotype and that it has a marked impact on macrophage uptake. Please consider restructuring the results based on this order.

Reviewer #2: Shem-Tov and Gal-Mor identified in their manuscript the SPI-1 repressor HilE as a negative regulator of motility at elevated temperatures for typhoidal Salmonella serovars. While the group described the inhibition of bacterial motility at 42°C for specific for typhoidal serovars in an earlier manuscript, they reproduced their finding in the present manuscript at 40°C more closely resembling enteric fever in patients. To elucidate the mechanism behind, the group designed a chromogenic reporter system allowing for high throughput screening of flagellar gene induction. This reporter system was combined with a dense transposon screen to identify genes responsible for the attenuated motility at febrile temperatures in a multi-stage screening setup. Here, genes involved in lysine production (yffB, dapBE) and SPI-1 related genes (invG, sipD, hilE) were identified. Functional characterization of knockout mutants identified HilE to be responsible for the observed phenotype. Since HilE is described as a negative regulator of the SPI-1 master regulator HilD, the group also tested hilD deletion mutants in reporter, motiliy and qPCR assays which demonstrated the HilE effect to be mediated via HilD. HilD probably acts via transcriptional activation of flagellar master regulator FlhDC. Moreover, the group tested the uptake of S. Paratyphi A (SPA) in human THP-1 macrophages. Absence of HilE led to increased uptake of SPA at 40°C. Finally they tested different other typhoidal and non-typhoidal serovars (NTS) for the motility phenotype at 40°C. Interestingly, only typhoidal Salmonella with the exception of S. Paratyphi B showed the reduced motility at 40°C. Deletion of hilE in the typhoidal serovars SPA, Typhi and Sendai increased motility at 40°C.

The manuscript is clearly and well written making the argumentation of the authors comprehensible. However, although identifying the HilE-HilD axis to be involved in thermoregulation of motility, an actual temperature-dependent mechanism remains elusive. In their working model, HilE should have an increased affinity for HilD in typhoidal Salmonella (except SPB) compared to NTS (and SPB). Can this be explained on the molecular level and ideally addressed experimentally? Although I can follow the argumentation of the authors to include the infection data of THP-1 macrophages (Fig. 6, systemic spread in enteric fever), it still feels a little disconnected from the rest of the manuscript.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: No further experiments are necessary. However, The data in figure 6 would benefit similar mutants in other Salmonella serovars being tested and included in this analysis. Possibly something to think of for the future maybe.

Reviewer #2: 1. Can the authors demonstrate the temperature-dependent difference of the HilD-HilE interaction using co-IP or suitable reporter systems (e.g. as shown in Grenz et al. J. Bacteriol 2018 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00750-17)

2. Are there differences in the sequences of HilD and/or HilE which might explain this different behavior? If differences exist, do typhoidal Salmonella separate from NTS (and SPB) in unsupervised clustering of sequence alignments? Can critical amino acids be identified based on the known structure of the HilD-HilE complex?

3. Could there be temperature- and serovar dependent differences in HilE/D protein stability?

4. How does STM behave in the motility assay expressing HilE and/or HilD of STA and vice versa?

5. Based on their findings, there should be a major impact of SPI-1 T3SS expression at 40°C vs. 37°C in typhoidal Salmonella. Did the authors also test invasion of non-phagocytic cells under these conditions?

6. Although the group previously showed that entry in macrophages depends on functional flagella, it would be interesting to dissect the influence of motility/chemotaxis (near surface swimming) from flagella-mediated adhesion. Here, the authors could compare infection with (as in the present manuscript) and without mild centrifugation.

7. I’m wondering about the expression of hilE and hilD in O/N cultures. Depending on the conditions (aeration, NaCl content) SPI-1 expression could be rather low. Did the authors check with RT-qPCR expression of these genes (and flagellar genes)?

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Outlined below are my specific comments.

1. Please refrain from using STM, SPA etc it is not difficult to write S. Typhimuirum and S. Paratyphi A in its place and really helps the reader follow which serovar you are using.

2. Please rename all mutants as ∆hilE, ∆hilD etc etc instead of hilE and hilD, this will then conform with standard genetic practice and allow the reader to differentiate between you discussing a gene, its overexpression, its expression and its deletion.

3. Please place the supplementary figures into the supplementary document to go along with their legends. Having a figure with no legend in such material is pointless.

4. Figure Y-axis: I had a hard time understanding your y-axis choice for many of the graphs and thus the interpretation of most of the data. It would be appreciated if you follow the rules of using a uniform axis ( -2 to +2) and not have the X-axis cross the Y-axis at 1 when in essence these are normal bar charts. For example, the data in figure 1 suggests a very strong downregulation of motility when in reality S. Paratyphi A is MOTILE at 40°C but I agree is reduced compared to S. Typhimurium. As a result, the data in A and B does not really correlate with the phenotype observed which is a 3-fold reduction in motility as assayed by the semi-solid agar swarming assay. This will be a recurring theme that I am concerned that your expression data at times does not correlate well with the observed phenotype.

5. Figure 3: You do not need to convince a microbiologist/microbial geneticist that the colonies you have isolated were blue as shown in Fig 3A&B. If you really want to include this data place it in the supplementary data and edit out the text on page 10 lines 195 to 205.

6. Page 10 Genetics: Please justify why the numbers of mutants that are analysed keeps changing or present the data for all 23. You can have a clear statement that for this study the focus was HilE at the end of this genetic section, but please stay consistent. Please also make sure you numbering is consistent in Figure 3 you have these as 3-3 3-2 13-3 etc etc but in table 1 they are 3-15 3-19 etc etc which way around are they supposed to be? You must have sequence data for all of them so why are you only showing these.

7. Figure 3D, 4D, 5D, 7A and 7C. You are not presenting ‘relative motility data’ in these graphs. Furthermore, these graphs specifically relate back to point 3 regarding the irregular use of y-axis scales, the overexaggerated axis scale does not represent the true impact of these genetic manipulations.

I could not generate from the methods or my own assessment of your motility data shown in 3C how you came to these numbers. It is not simply the radius or diameter of the swarms divided by each other, and please do not use the argument that the 3D image is just an example, you are showing data that should in some context correlate to the quantification. I tried to do this using a ruler from your figures. For example, WT 37°C 41 mm 40°C 28 mm which equates to 0.68 or a 1.5 fold reduction and not ~0.3. Your data is robust and in every case is justified, just please consider presenting the reduction in an easier understandable format. Even if it is the quantified means placed next to each other on a bar chart without any convoluted further calculations.

8. Figure 4: The Ponceau S staining is not necessary in any of the figures or again if you feel it is put it in supplementary data. Furthermore, once you have defined your motility quantification method and presentation style you do not need to always show the motility swarms. In this instance as well as other places the motility swarm data is not correlating well with expression or quantification. Figure 4A please state what scale format is being used on the y-axis or again just use a linear scale so the reader can see how small some of the values are.

9. Page 15 297-318: You could discuss this data in a much simpler manner. You also overlook either purposefully or non-intentionally the impact of ∆hilE at 37°C.

10. Figure 6 please reassess your fold reduction statements or at least make it clearer what is being compared. For example, ∆hilE @ 40°C is ~ 150% ∆hilE @ 37°C is ~75% that’s a 2-fold difference not a 3-fold difference (page 17 line 358).

11. Figure legends: There is too much methodology hidden within the legends. If this is not in your methods section add it to the methods. If it is in the methods do not repeat it here. Please also explain what is meant in the methods by four biological repeats in one representative, out of two independent experiments is this n= 4 or n = 8?

12. Figure 7 Legend: Why were different strains measured at different times and why is this important enough for you to mention it? As you have mentioned it you really need to justify why in the main text or in the legend.

13. Page 23 line 478 This is the first EVER mention of SARA 43 and SARA 44. If there is a reason you used both, this needs justifying and possible highlighting in the results section when narrating through figure 7.

14. Discussion: I liked the discussion and how it correlates to how Salmonella as species interacts with us. I did not look at figure 8 although I did note it was nicely presented.

Reviewer #2: Minor point: Instead of using bars only for the plots, it is generally recommended to show in addition the individual data points making up that bar.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Matthew Wolfgang

16 Sep 2025

PPATHOGENS-D-25-00929R1

HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella serovars at elevated physiological temperatures

PLOS Pathogens

Dear Dr. Gal-Mor,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 30 days Nov 15 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Matthew C. Wolfgang, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Matthew Wolfgang

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for your thorough revision. Both reviewers were very positive, however, Reviewer 1 still has some outstanding concerns about the presentation of Figures 1B, 3C/D, 4D, 5D and 6A/C. Please specifically address this concern in your next and hopefully final revision. No additional comments need to be address.  

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: With the revised manuscript the authors have responded thoroughly and constructively to the previously raised critical points.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: The authors have made a good effort to cover all the comments from both reviewers. This is a complex story with essentially too much information/data integrated into one manuscript but I do get why they have done this.

The hilE swap and express experiments are a nice inclusion. However, they do seem to have opened up another research direction complicating the narrative even further.

Reviewer #2: My initial concerns focused on the mechanistic basis of the HilE/HilD effect, possible sequence differences, protein stability, and reciprocal expression of HilE/HilD between S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi A. These points have now been addressed. The authors show that HilD is identical between the two backgrounds, and HilE differs by only three amino acids. Protein swap experiments demonstrate that HilE is required but not sufficient for motility thermoregulation. They identified a novel cis-regulatory element in the flhD promoter, likely involving H-NS, which provides a plausible extension of the mechanism. The suggestion to differentiate motility/chemotaxis from flagella-mediated adhesion in macrophage uptake was implemented (new Fig. S4). With this new data the study is clearly strengthened including a refined working model.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: The quality of the new figures in the PDF we get to download as a reviewer is shocking, however, this is not entirely your fault. Many of the new data sets were over-pixlated so it was very difficult to read the axis.

You were asked to refrain from using the x-axis crossing at 1 in figures 1B, 3C/D, 4D, 5D and 6A/C. They are essenitally bar charts where your format over represents the negative phenotypes being observed and under represents any positive impact. You were also asked in the supplementary information to have the firgure legends with the figures instead of in seperate documents. I am unsure if this last point is PLOS pathogen policy but it makes it very difficult to appreciate the supplementary data flicking between documents. Would it not be easier to include all your supplementary data in one word/pdf file with each figure interleafed by its associated legend.

Reviewer #2: Uptake data are now presented in absolute rather than relative values, improving clarity. Sequence comparisons, promoter analyses, and additional serovar testing were also included. The reorganization of the results improved readability. Importantly, individual data points are now displayed in bar charts, which increases transparency.

However, some questions remain open including the precise temperature-dependent molecular mechanism. These results point to the likely involvement of additional regulatory factors and provide a clear perspective for future investigations.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, we strongly recommend that you use PLOS’s NAAS tool (https://ngplosjournals.pagemajik.ai/artanalysis) to test your figure files. NAAS can convert your figure files to the TIFF file type and meet basic requirements (such as print size, resolution), or provide you with a report on issues that do not meet our requirements and that NAAS cannot fix.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 2

Matthew Wolfgang

29 Sep 2025

Dear Prof. Gal-Mor,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella serovars at elevated physiological temperatures' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Matthew C. Wolfgang, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Matthew Wolfgang

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Matthew Wolfgang

Dear Prof. Gal-Mor,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "HilE mediates motility thermoregulation in typhoidal Salmonella serovars at elevated physiological temperatures," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

For Research Articles, you will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The flagella-chemotaxis regulation in S. Paratyphi A.

    (A) The motility-chemotaxis regulon in Salmonella is organized in three hierarchical transcriptional classes. The class 1 operon contains the flhD and flhC genes that together encode the master regulator of flagella-chemotaxis regulon, FlhDC. The heteromultimeric complex (FlhD4C2) is positioned at the top of this hierarchy and activates the transcription of class 2 operons. Class 2 genes responsible for basal body assembly. Following the assembly of the early flagellar basal body, the repressor FlgM is exported from the cell, releasing the class 3 transcription factor σ28 (FliA). This activates the expression of class 3 genes, leading to the completion of the hook and filament assembly. The positive regulators HilD, FliZ, FlhDC and FliA are shown in green, while the negative regulators involved FliT and FlgM are shown in red. Motility genes that were analyzed by RT-qPCR in Fig. 1A are shown in magenta. Genes that are inactivated in S. Paratyphi A are shown in light grey. (B) Graphical illustration of the flagella structure. Proteins that were detected by the MS analysis in Fig. 1B are shown in purple.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1013133.s001.pdf (462.9KB, pdf)
    S2 Fig. Reconstruction null deletion in hilE, invA, invG, and dapB and their effect on S. Paratyphi A motility.

    (A) S. Paratyphi A WT and its isogenic null mutant strains ΔhilE, ΔinvG, ΔinvA and ΔdapD were grown overnight at 37°C, spotted onto soft agar plates and incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 5.5 h. The fold change motility at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown, while SEM is represented by the error bars. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance in relation to S. Paratyphi A WT. (B) Swimming motility on soft agar plates of S. Paratyphi A WT, its isogenic ΔhilE strain and two transposon insertion mutants in hilE (clones 3–2 and 8–2). All strains were grown overnight at 37°C and then 10 µl from each culture were spotted on soft agar LB plates that were incubated at 37°C and 40°C for 5.5 h. (C) The motility radius of the strains was measured and their fold change in motility at 40°C vs. 37°C is shown. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance relative to S. Paratyphi A WT. *, P-value <0.05; **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013133.s002.tif (838.8KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Motility thermoregulation is not common among NTS serovars.

    The motility of three typhoidal (Typhi, Paratyphi A, and Sendai) and 16 NTS serovars was measured on semisolid LB agar plates at 37°C and 42°C. The mean change in the motility between 42°C and 37°C is shown. Bars represent the mean of 2–3 independent experiments and SEM is indicated by the error bars.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1013133.s003.pdf (13.1KB, pdf)
    S4 Fig. S. Paratyphi A uptake by THP-1 macrophages with and without application of a mild centrifugation.

    Cultures of S. Paratyphi A (WT and its isogenic hilE and fliC mutants) were grown at 37 or 40°C and were used to infect differentiated THP-1 human macrophage-like cells at MOI of five at both temperatures. Salmonella uptake by THP-1 cells was determined using the gentamicin protection assay and calculated the percentage of the intracellular CFUs recovered at 2 h p.i from the total number of CFUs used to infect the cells. Bars present the mean value four biological repeats and thier calculated SEM. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to calculate statistical significance.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1013133.s004.pdf (14.1KB, pdf)
    S5 Fig. Swapping HilE between S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhimurium does not alter motility thermoregulation.

    (A) The 310 amino acid protein sequence of HilD in S. Typhimurium strain SL1344 (accession number CBW18953.1) and its ortholog in S. Paratyphi A strain 45157 (accession number QWV88109.1) were aligned using CLUSTALW. Alignment image of the amino acid identity was created by the BoxShade tool (https://junli.netlify.app/apps/boxshade/) and show complete identity at the protein level between these two orthologues. (B) 177 amino acids of the HilE protein in S. Typhimurium strain SL1344 (accession number CBW20528.1) and its ortholog in S. Paratyphi A strain 45157 (accession number QWV89528.1) were aligned and presented as above. Three divergent amino acids between these serovars are highlighted. (C) S. Typhimurium strains including WT, ∆hilE, ∆hilE complemented with the empty vector (∆hilE/P), hilE from S. Typhimurium (∆hilE/hilESTM) or hilE from S. Paratyphi A (∆hilE/hilESPA); and S. Paratyphi A strains including WT, ∆hilE, and ∆hilE complemented with the empty vector (∆hilE/P), hilE from S. Paratyphi A (∆hilE/hilESPA) or S. Typhimurium (∆hilE/hilESTM) were grown at 37°C aerobically for overnight. Ten µl from each culture were spotted on soft LB agar plates that were incubated at 37°C or 40°C for 4 h before imaging.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1013133.s005.pdf (457.3KB, pdf)
    S6 Fig. Identification of a CIS thermoregulatory element (CITRE) contributes to motility thermoregulation in S. Paratyphi A.

    (A) The genetic organization of the flhDC promotor is shown. HilD binding site is presented according to Singer et al. [17]. Black arrows indicate the six flhDC transcription start sites, while their -10 promoter elements are indicated by a closed box, as reported by Yanagihara et al. [58]. The HilD binding site is highlighted in blue and the identified 49-bp CITRE element is marked by a green bar, overlapping with two putative H-NS binding sites predicted by PRODORIC (https://www.prodoric.de) that are shown as orange boxes. (B) WT S. Typhimurium, WT S. Paratyphi A, and their isogenic strains harboring a 49-bp deletion of the CITRE element (∆CITRE) were subcultured in LB grown for 3 h at 37°C and 40°C and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. Fold change in the expression of five flagellar genes (flhD, fliL, flgK, motA, and fliC) at 40°C relative to their expression at 37°C is shown as the mean value of three biological replicates, with SEM represented by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance between the WT background and its isogenic ∆CITRE mutant. (C) The level of FliC at the cellular fraction was analyzed by Western blotting using a S. Paratyphi A anti-FliC antibody. Ponceau S staining and the detection of a ~ 34 kDa cross-reacting band were used as loading controls. FliC expression in the ∆CITRE strain, relative to its expression in the WT background at 37°C, is presented by numerical values below the WB. (D) Cultures of the above strains were spotted onto soft agar plates that were incubated at 37 and 40°C, for 5.5 h. The fold change in motility at 40°C relative to 37°C is shown, while SEM is represented by the error bars. Unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical significance. **, P-value <0.01; ***, P-value < 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013133.s006.tif (1.3MB, tif)
    S1 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    ppat.1013133.s007.docx (36.7KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Primers used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    ppat.1013133.s008.docx (18.9KB, docx)
    S3 Table. The numerical values used to build graphs.

    (XLSX)

    ppat.1013133.s009.xlsx (33.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers 28_07_25.pdf

    ppat.1013133.s011.pdf (660.4KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers R2.pdf

    ppat.1013133.s012.pdf (154.4KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES