Abstract
A woman in her 40s with a history of ER/PR+, HER2-negative breast cancer presented with a seizure three years after mastectomy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a right caudate head mass, which was concerning for either high-grade glioma or metastatic disease, but biopsy was deemed too high risk. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tumor-derived DNA (tDNA) analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) was ordered, revealing a gain-of-function variant in PIK3CA, ERBB2 copy number gain, and high aneuploidy, findings consistent with breast cancer brain metastasis. Based on these results, the patient was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-targeted therapy. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic value of CSF tDNA analysis in central nervous system (CNS) lesions when biopsy is not feasible. The report also illustrates how clonal evolution, such as acquired ERBB2 amplification, can occur in metastatic disease and influence treatment decisions.
Keywords: breast cancer, biomarkers, personalized therapy, liquid biopsy, cerebrospinal fluid, brain metastasis
1. Introduction
Primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors can begin either in the brain or spinal cord and encompass >100 distinct types including glioma and medulloblastoma [1] or they can metastasize from other tissue to the CNS with metastasis from lung, breast, and skin being the most common [2]. Although the true incidence of brain metastases has been challenging to determine, it is estimated that approximately 40% of patients with solid tumors will develop CNS metastatic disease [3]. Metastasis to the brain occurs in an estimated 20–40% of breast cancer patients with a median overall survival of 1 month when untreated and 1–2 years with treatment [4]; it is the second most common cause of brain metastasis. The risk of brain metastasis in individuals with stage IV breast cancer is usually highest for those with more aggressive types of breast cancer such as HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer than luminal subtypes [5]. Between 5% and 10% of breast cancer patients with CNS metastases include two distinct entities: cerebral parenchymal involvement (brain metastases, BM) and infiltration of the cerebrospinal fluid-filled leptomeningeal space (leptomeningeal disease, LMD) [3]. As a result, CNS metastasis represents a unique evolutionary trajectory compared to extracranial metastases. CNS involvement remains a major clinical challenge, partly due to the blood–brain barrier (BBB), with the diagnosis of intracranial brain metastases relying heavily on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly in cases when lesion location is unamenable to biopsy [6]. Complicating diagnosis, there is considerable overlap of radiologic findings for intracranial metastatic lesions and glial neoplasms [6]. Tumor molecular profiling can offer significant insight into pathogenesis and tissue of origin, particularly in CNS neoplasms [7,8]. Since tumor-derived DNA (tDNA) from CNS disease is shed and circulated in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), next-generation sequencing (NGS) of CSF tDNA has gained recognition as an impactful liquid biopsy tool [9,10], particularly in the context of negative CSF cytology which is the gold standard, however with limited sensitivity [11].
Belay Diagnostics launched its Summit™ [12] and Vantage™ [13] liquid biopsy tests to potentially increase the efficacy of diagnosis of CNS malignancies and decrease the uncertainty and morbidity associated with the current standard of care, which involves neurosurgical procedures. Summit demonstrated an analytical sensitivity of 96% for single-/multi-nucleotide variants (SNVs/MNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels) at a 95% limit of detection of 0.30% variant allele frequency (VAF). Analytical sensitivity for chromosomal arm level aneuploidy was 83% at abs(log2r) of 0.09 limit of detection [12]. Clinical sensitivity across a cohort of 113 CNS tumors was demonstrated to be 88% with a specificity of 95% [12]. The Belay Vantage™ assay evaluates MGMT promoter methylation status in CSF of individuals with known or suspected central nervous system tumors. The assay uses quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) post enzymatic conversion of tDNA extracted from CSF and has an analytical sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 100% [13]. Since launch, both tests have demonstrated significant clinical utility in informing the diagnosis and management of primary and secondary CNS malignancies, as documented in the literature, obviating biopsy [14] and informing diagnosis of metastatic CNS disease [15].
Since CNS metastasis represents a unique evolutionary trajectory, accurate diagnosis to inform treatment and management is key to disease progression and overall survival. The identification of metastasis driver mutations in CSF tDNA guides treatment, expanding treatment options and enabling targeted therapies as applicable. In breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM), surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) potentially followed by whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are utilized for local management [4]. Systemic therapy use, however, can be dependent on molecular characterization, such as HER2 expression status and mutational status of ERBB2, PIK3CA, AKT1, PTEN, and ESR1 [4,16], particularly in the primary tumor. Uncovering the molecular landscape of BCBM using CSF can be pivotal for the selection of targeted therapies, especially in cases when tumor tissue is not accessible, obviating biopsy and preventing unnecessary morbidity. Herein we present a case of woman in her 40s with an intracranial lesion deemed too high-risk for biopsy. CSF tDNA analysis with the Belay Summit and Vantage tests was used alongside MRI to aid in BCBM diagnosis and therapeutic decision making, highlighting the role of CSF liquid biopsy to inform diagnosis and treatment of CNS tumors, particularly BCBM.
2. Materials and Methods
The Belay Diagnostics Summit [12] and Vantage [13] tests were used for CSF tDNA analysis. These CSF based liquid biopsy assays are CLIA/CAP approved for the evaluation of simultaneous detection of both gene level variants, single and multi-nucleotide variants, including insertions and deletions (SNVs, MNVs and indels) in 32 genes and chromosome-arm-level alterations (aneuploidy) [12] along with MGMT promoter methylation [13]. Summit [12] uses both duplex NGS to detect genomic gene-level variants and low-pass whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to assess aneuploidy in a single CSF sample with low input tDNA. Vantage [13] interrogates 12 CpG sites in the MGMT promoter using enzymatic conversion followed by qPCR.
Both tests can be performed either independently or simultaneously using a single tDNA input. Post sequencing, variants are evaluated to identify those that are clinically significant in that they are actionable (have associated targeted therapies/clinical trials or diagnostic/prognostic relevance) in line with recommendations from the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines for the interpretation of somatic variants [17]. For this particular case, tumor-derived DNA extracted from 12 mL of CSF submitted to Belay for testing via Summit and Vantage was used to evaluate for clinically significant variants to determine next steps in treatment and management of disease.
3. Case Presentation (Results)
A woman with a known history of ER/PR+, HER2-negative carcinoma of the left breast status post unilateral mastectomy in her 40s (Figure 1A) showed no signs of disease recurrence for about three years. No family history of cancer was noted, and her personal medical history was otherwise significant for polycystic ovarian syndrome and a history of seizures beginning in her 40s with no established cause. She presented to the emergency department for a generalized tonic–clonic (GTC) seizure about three years after her first epileptic episode (and cancer diagnosis). Per standard of care, brain MRI was ordered which showed a homogeneously enhancing right caudate head mass with intralesional hemorrhage, increased perfusion, and mild surrounding vasogenic edema. Additional CT evaluation of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was negative. The location of the lesion was determined to be too high-risk for biopsy, and the patient was hospitalized with a referral for a neuro-oncology consult two days later.
Figure 1.
Summary of clinical events and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) liquid biopsy findings. (A) Graphical chronology of the case including diagnoses and key clinical events (black triangles), surgery (pink), lumbar puncture (blue), Belay Summit CSF tumor-derived DNA (tDNA) analysis (green), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (yellow), and systemic therapy (gray box) as well as brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (post-contrast T1-weighted image displayed on the left, T2 FLAIR on the right). Diagnosis, Dx; Generalized tonic–clonic, GTC; Metastatic, Mets. (B) Single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number variants (CNV), and chromosomal arm-level aneuploidy detected in CSF tDNA by Belay Summit. (C) Using low pass whole genome sequencing of tDNA, copy number gain of ERBB2 was detected in CSF at a log2 ratio of 0.145 as shown in the ichorDNA plot.
During the consultation, the physical exam and neurological assessment were normal. Upon review of imaging, the brain lesion was found to be concerning for high-grade glioma versus BCBM. To address the differential diagnosis, the patient underwent a lumbar puncture (LP) which yielded normal cell count, protein, and glucose levels as well as negative CSF cytology, with no malignant cells being detected. About 12 mL of CSF was sent to Belay Diagnostics for genomic profiling via Summit [12] and Vantage [13] tests to inform diagnosis in the context of positive neuroimaging and negative CSF cytology results. Summit reported a variant of clinical significance in the PIK3CA gene, Q546K at a variant allelic frequency of 0.1% as well as a high level of chromosomal arm level alterations including gain of chr17q12 (containing ERBB2), with Vantage being negative for MGMT promoter methylation (Figure 1B,C).
While the lesion identified on brain imaging was more concerning for high-grade glioma rather than metastatic disease, the CSF liquid biopsy findings more closely aligned with breast cancer metastasis. PIK3CA Q546K is a well-characterized oncogenic variant that results in constitutive activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR cell proliferation signaling pathway [18]. Oncogenic variants in PIK3CA are one of the most common genetic alterations in breast cancer with an estimated frequency of 26% [19]. While PIK3CA alterations can be seen in high-grade glioma, they are a less common biomarker in that primary CNS tumor type [20]. Gain of ERBB2 is also one of the most recurrent copy number gains in breast cancer brain metastases and is associated with HER2 overexpression [21,22,23]. Lastly, high aneuploidy is indicative of chromosomal instability, a key driver of metastasis across cancer types [24].
Given the CSF tDNA findings and the patient’s cancer history, it was determined that the brain lesion observed on neuroimaging was most likely due to metastatic breast carcinoma and not a high-grade glioma as previously suspected. The patient was started on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a HER2 antibody-chemotherapy conjugate, with Gamma Knife radiation to the mass. MRI post-radiation showed overall favorable response, patient is currently stable on T-DXd with a proposed MRI in a month to evaluate for treatment efficacy and response.
4. Discussion
Diagnosis of CNS tumors, particularly brain metastasis, relies significantly on neuroimaging and CSF cytology in the context of clinical information. The limited sensitivity observed with both methods can be improved by including molecular profiling of CSF tDNA to inform diagnosis of CNS tumors [9] as observed in this case presentation. Recent studies have shown the impact of liquid biopsy to inform diagnosis of CNS tumors, including the Belay Summit test, which achieved a clinical sensitivity of 100% in metastatic breast cancer (n = 5) during assay validation [12]. A cohort study evaluating six cases of BCBM demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting oncogenic genomic alterations in CSF circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study also critically included paired genomic profiling of primary tumor tissue, plasma, and other metastatic sites, revealing key differences in the genomic variants identified in each specimen type [25]. This finding illustrates how clonal evolution promotes disease progression and potentially highlights opportunities for targeted treatment, especially against CNS-localized driver mutations. Other studies report 55–100% sensitivity when investigating the use of CSF ctDNA analysis to detect brain metastasis from varying primary tumor types [9,26]. While careful pattern analysis of MRI findings and clinical course are essential for characterizing CNS neoplasms, the use of CSF tDNA analysis in this patient helped clarify the differential diagnosis, distinguishing between primary and metastatic disease.
Beyond confirming tumor of origin in this case, CSF ctDNA analysis revealed potential genomic therapeutic targets. Notably, the patient’s original pathology of the primary tumor was found to be HER2-negative, though a copy number gain of ERBB2 was detected in CSF tDNA several years later. Recent investigations have demonstrated successful prediction of HER2 status per the ASCO/CAP guidelines with high specificity using NGS to detect copy number alterations of ERBB2 [27]. ASCO/CAP recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer were last updated in 2023 and reaffirmed use of immunohistochemistry for best practice [28]. ERBB2 analysis by NGS nevertheless shows great promise as a clinical tool that can be performed on liquid biopsy with a relatively quick turnaround time.
HER2 amplification has been detected in CSF tumor cells of patients with LMD spreading from various solid tumors including breast, upper GI, and lung [29]. Switches in HER2 status (HER2 flip) between primary breast tumors and brain metastasis or disease recurrence have been reported in the recent literature, highlighting that CNS metastatic disease can evolve and have different biological features compared to the primary tumor. In a matched case study of 136 BCBM patients, 54% of HER2-negative primary breast cancer cases were found to have detectable HER2 expression in brain metastatic site resections [22]. Using ERBB2 copy number analysis by NGS, another study of 20 BCBM patients with matched primary tumor and brain resections reported that ERBB2 alterations were acquired in 20% of HER2-negative cases [23]. Notably, HER2-positive status has been identified as a predictor of neurologic death in patients with BM (n = 1218, study completed prior to FDA approval of T-DXd) [30].
Alongside research that demonstrates the prevalence and potentially poor prognosis of HER2-positive brain metastasis, recent efforts have further developed HER2-targeted therapies for BCBM [31]. Identifying HER2 amplification in the CSF can provide opportunities for targeted anti-HER2 therapies such as intrathecal trastuzumab. Additionally, serial monitoring of HER2 status in CSF can show changes over time, influencing treatment decisions. Following detection of ERBB2 gain in the present case, T-DXd was administered following SRS as a preferred systemic therapy for HER2-positive BCBM per NCCN guidelines [31]. In clinical trials, T-DXd exhibited up to a 71% intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in HER2-positive BCBM [32,33]. A similar iORR of 73% has been observed in newly diagnosed BCBM patients treated with a combination therapy of pyrotinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and capecitabine [34]. With the great promise of HER2-targeted therapies, it becomes more critical to identify HER2 positivity in BCBM, a dynamic molecular feature that can arise with CNS involvement.
The most recent 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS edition 5 advocates for the adoption of integrated diagnostic approaches containing both classical histology and tissue-based tests along with molecular characterization [35]. Additionally, the recent update to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, version 3.2024 states that molecular analysis using next generation sequencing is the preferred approach for the pathologic evaluation of CNS tumors, as it screens for multiple diagnostic and prognostic mutations in one test [31]. In line with previously demonstrated clinical utility to obviate biopsy [14] and inform diagnosis of metastatic disease [15], this case report further highlights the clinical utility of the Belay Summit and Vantage tests in increasing the sensitivity of CSF liquid biopsy by providing actionable genomic information for BCBM. The addition of genomic testing as recommended by WHO and NCCN does indeed increase the sensitivity of CSF liquid biopsy testing and provides a path forward for the patient.
5. Conclusions
Contributing to the growing body of literature on liquid biopsy clinical utility, this case report exemplifies the use of CSF tDNA analysis to clarify differential diagnosis, confirming secondary CNS disease and further characterizes malignancy using genomic information to steer treatment. The finding of molecular results using CSF liquid biopsy in the context of negative CSF cytology to inform diagnosis and treatment solidifies the clinical utility of the Belay Summit test. Identification of a HER2 status switch in this patient’s brain metastasis supports clonal evolution of metastatic disease and allowed for timely delivery of targeted therapy. In the era of precision medicine, effective detection of spatial and temporal molecular landscapes is crucial for tackling an ever-evolving disease. CSF liquid biopsy offers clinicians a minimally invasive way to gain insight into BCBM and determine the best course of treatment for their patient.
Author Contributions
M.Y.—conceptualization, review and editing of manuscript, A.L.—interpretation of data, writing—original draft, V.U.—interpretation of data, review and editing of manuscript. V.K.—data analysis, review and editing of manuscript, K.F.S.—review and editing of manuscript, Q.N.—data analysis, review and editing of manuscript, H.V.R.—conceptualization, supervision, writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and after review by the Advarra Institutional Review Board (Protocol # Pro00090291) was determined to not require IRB oversight as it does not meet the DHHS definition of human subjects research under 45 CFR 46 for studies involving humans.
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent been obtained from the subject for submission and publication of this case report, including the images and associated text.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: A.L., V.U., V.K., K.F.S., Q.N. and H.V.R. are employees of Belay Diagnostics and receive a salary and stock options. M.Y. has no conflicts to disclose.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Valvi S., Fouladi M., Fisher M.J., Gottardo N.G. IDH mutant high-grade gliomas. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2025;18:1662414. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2025.1662414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brenner A.W., Patel A.J. Review of Current Principles of the Diagnosis and Management of Brain Metastases. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:857622. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.857622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aizer A.A., Lamba N., Ahluwalia M.S., Aldape K., Boire A., Brastianos P.K., Brown P.D., Camidge D.R., Chiang V.L., Davies M.A., et al. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:1613–1646. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raghavendra A.S., Ibrahim N.K. Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review. JCO Oncol. Pract. 2024;20:1348–1359. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grinda T., Aizer A.A., Lin N.U., Sammons S.L. Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2025;26:14–35. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01286-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hodler J., Kubik-Huch R., Roos J.E. Diseases of the Brain, Head and Neck, Spine 2024–2027: Diagnostic Imaging. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chahardehi A.M., Faraji N., Emtiazi N., Nasiri R., Daghagheleh M., Mohammadaein H., Masoudi F., Vakili K.G., Azar A.S., Fatemian H., et al. The emerging role of circulating tumor DNA in brain tumor research. IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 2025;18:714–725. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim H., Park K.U. Clinical Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Precision Oncology. Cancer Res. Treat. 2023;55:351–366. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ramkissoon L.A., Pegram W., Haberberger J., Danziger N., Lesser G., Strowd R., Dahiya S., Cummings T.J., Bi W.L., Abedalthagafi M., et al. Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid to Guide Clinical Decision Making for Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:544680. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.544680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yan W., Xu T., Zhu H., Yu J. Clinical Applications of Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biopsy for Central Nervous System Tumors. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:719–731. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S229562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bae Y.S., Cheong J.W., Chang W.S., Kim S., Oh E.J., Kim S.H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples. Korean J. Pathol. 2013;47:563–568. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nie Q., Schilter K.F., Hernandez K.M., Adams J.N., Jagadish R., Acevedo A., Larson A., Domagala B.A., Vo S.A., Khurana S., et al. Analytical Validation and Clinical Sensitivity of the Belay Summit Assay for the Detection of DNA Variants in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Primary and Metastatic Central Nervous System Cancer. J. Mol. Diagn. 2025;27:615–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schilter K.F., Nie Q., Adams J.N., Jagadish R., Acevedo A., Larson A., Vo S.A., Domagala B.A., Hernandez K.M., Douville C., et al. Analytical validation of the Belay Vantage assay for evaluation of MGMT promoter methylation using enzymatically converted tumorDNA from cerebrospinal fluid. Cancer Genet. 2025;294–295:94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Youssef M., Larson A., Udhane V., Schilter K.F., Nie Q., Reddi H.V. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid tumor-derived DNA to obviate biopsy of IDH-mutant brainstem glioma in an adult. J. Liq. Biopsy. 2025;9:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Youssef M., Larson A., Schilter K.F., Nie Q., Reddi H.V. Choroid plexus metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma-A case report and review of the literature. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2025;7:vdaf146. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gradishar W.J., Moran M.S., Abraham J., Abramson V., Aft R., Agnese D., Allison K.H., Anderson B., Bailey J., Burstein H.J., et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2024;22:331–357. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li M.M., Datto M., Duncavage E.J., Kulkarni S., Lindeman N.I., Roy S., Tsimberidou A.M., Vnencak-Jones C.L., Wolff D.J., Younes A., et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J. Mol. Diagn. 2017;19:4–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gymnopoulos M., Elsliger M.A., Vogt P.K. Rare cancer-specific mutations in PIK3CA show gain of function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:5569–5574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701005104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tomas A., Pojo M. PIK3CA Mutations: Are They a Relevant Target in Adult Diffuse Gliomas? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:5276. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giannoudis A., Sokol E.S., Bhogal T., Ramkissoon S.H., Razis E.D., Bartsch R., Shaw J.A., McGregor K., Clark A., Huang R.S.P., et al. Breast cancer brain metastases genomic profiling identifies alterations targetable by immune-checkpoint and PARP inhibitors. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2024;8:282. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00761-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moss N.S., Singh J.M., Reiner A.S., Drago J.Z., Modi S., Seidman A.D., Chandarlapaty S., Ross D.S. Incidence of HER2-expressing brain metastases in patients with HER2-null breast cancer: A matched case analysis. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023;9:86. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00592-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Priedigkeit N., Hartmaier R.J., Chen Y., Vareslija D., Basudan A., Watters R.J., Thomas R., Leone J.P., Lucas P.C., Bhargava R., et al. Intrinsic Subtype Switching and Acquired ERBB2/HER2 Amplifications and Mutations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:666–671. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhakula-Kostadinova N., Taylor A.M. Patterns of Aneuploidy and Signaling Consequences in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2024;84:2575–2587. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-0169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Mattos-Arruda L., Mayor R., Ng C.K.Y., Weigelt B., Martinez-Ricarte F., Torrejon D., Oliveira M., Arias A., Raventos C., Tang J., et al. Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8839. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Diaz M., Chudsky S., Pentsova E., Miller A.M. Clinical applications of cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsies in central nervous system tumors. Transl. Oncol. 2024;41:101881. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xia D., Kuo F., Hughes M., Lindeman N., Manning D., Files J., Strauss S., Kirkner G., Mohammed-Abreu A., Winer E., et al. HER2/ERBB2 copy number analysis by targeted next-generation sequencing in breast cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2024;161:436–442. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wolff A.C., Somerfield M.R., Dowsett M., Hammond M.E.H., Hayes D.F., McShane L.M., Saphner T.J., Spears P.A., Allison K.H. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023;41:3867–3872. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kumthekar P.U., Blouw B., Corkos P., Nagpal S., Tripathy A., Piccioni D., Youssef M. The HER2 flip-HER2 amplification of tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid of breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease: Implications for treating the LM tumor with anti-HER2 therapy. Front. Oncol. 2024;14:1402651. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1402651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reese R.A., Lamba N., Catalano P.J., Cagney D.N., Wen P.Y., Aizer A.A. Incidence and Predictors of Neurologic Death in Patients with Brain Metastases. World Neurosurg. 2022;162:e401–e415. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nabors L.B., Hattangadi-Gluth J., Horbinski C., Portnow J. NCCN CNS Tumor Guidelines Update for 2024. Neuro Oncol. 2025;27:595–596. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jerusalem G., Park Y.H., Yamashita T., Hurvitz S.A., Modi S., Andre F., Krop I.E., Gonzalez Farre X., You B., Saura C., et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A DESTINY-Breast01 Subgroup Analysis. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:2754–2762. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Perez-Garcia J.M., Vaz Batista M., Cortez P., Ruiz-Borrego M., Cejalvo J.M., de la Haba-Rodriguez J., Garrigos L., Racca F., Servitja S., Blanch S., et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with central nervous system involvement from HER2-positive breast cancer: The DEBBRAH trial. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25:157–166. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang C., Xiang J., Zhang Q., Li J., Liu Y., Liu J. Intracranial Efficacy of Pyrotinib and Capecitabine Combination Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2024;18:909–917. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S451668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P., Brat D.J., Cree I.A., Figarella-Branger D., Hawkins C., Ng H.K., Pfister S.M., Reifenberger G., et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

