Abstract
This article investigates the state estimation of fractional-order memristive systems with discrete-time terms. By considering discrete fractional calculus, we propose a novel and efficient criterion for ensuring the global Mittag–Leffler stability of the estimation error system. Additionally, by utilizing a functional that incorporates a discrete fractional sum element, we derive the stability condition for the concerned system. It is noteworthy that the proposed approach integrates a vector optimization method, which enhances the understanding of how to construct a meaningful convex closure formed by quaternions. Finally, numerical simulations are conducted to validate the theoretical results.
Keywords: State estimation, Quaternion-valued system, Fractional-order, Discrete time
Subject terms: Mathematics and computing, Applied mathematics
Introduction
In1, the physicist L.O. Chua pointed out that a fourth fundamental element should exist, and he termed this hypothetical entity the “memristor”2. Its potential discovery could mark a significant leap forward in the development of increasingly powerful circuitry. Beyond its intrinsic scientific importance, the real excitement lies in the practical implementation of memristive systems, which represent a specific instance of a broader category of nonlinear dynamic devices.
Recent advancements in memristive neural networks have shifted focus toward understanding their dynamic behaviors3–11. For example, the impact of L
vy noise on these systems was explored in3, while the stability of memristive systems was analyzed by using a sliding mode controller in4. Additionally, studies in5 and6 delved into fractional-order memristive models. Notably, quaternion neural networks have garnered significant attention. The findings in9 demonstrated that by applying fundamental quaternion algorithms, Lagrange exponential stability conditions for quaternion memristive models can be established.
Simultaneously, quaternion-valued systems have gained increasing attention among scholars, leading to significant progress in the modeling of high-dimensional (three- and four-dimensional) data12–14. Consequently, a substantial portion of research has been dedicated to this area15–23. Among these studies, the existence of equilibrium points was verified in16, while local stability conditions were also examined, highlighting the system’s high storage capacity. In17, a convex optimization method was introduced for analyzing neural networks with quaternion-valued parameters. Furthermore,21 concentrated on quaternion-valued models in both continuous-time and discrete-time scenarios. These developments reveal the quaternion-valued system is a highly promising research direction with considerable potential.
For a system to effectively perform specific tasks, particularly for quaternion-valued memristive systems (which are relatively large-scale models), it is often crucial to obtain complete information about its states. However, this has proven to be an extremely challenging task for several reasons, including the sheer size of the system, the physical limitations of the devices involved, and the limited availability of measurement resources. Accordingly, it is quite necessary to estimate the system states through accessible estimations, and thus the state estimation issues have become the focus of research24–29. For example, via an event-triggered estimator, the memristive system with discrete terms was considered in24, non-fragile estimation was discussed in25,26, the results in27 addressed the exponential estimation problem for a class of quaternion memristive model.
A major issue in the dynamic of the quaternion memristive model is the existence of convex closures. When simply following the convex closure described in the earlier results, it is found that the convex closure herein is made up by quaternion parameters, which leaves us facing the following dilemma: how to ensure the convex closure is meaningful. Over the course of multiple training, a vector order method is proposed, which resolves this issue as it allows us to compare the size of quaternions.
Based on the aforementioned characterization of the quaternion memristive system, we will proceed to construct a series of conclusions that resolves the Mittag–Leffler state estimation issues and meets all requirements. We provide a rigorous analysis of our method and then give some empirical results. This entails the following challenges: (i) The Mittag–Leffler stability is proposed for the quaternion-valued discrete-time memristive system; (ii) In19,20, several researchers have utilized the decomposition method to study the dynamic behaviors of quaternion-valued neural networks. However, since quaternion-valued neural networks inherently represent a four-dimensional system, the decomposition approach may compromise the integrity of entire system in practical applications. In contrast to these studies, our work directly investigates quaternion-valued memristive neural networks without decomposing it into several subsystems, preserving the system’s full dimensionality and rigor; (iii) Fractional-order operators are introduced to a system with discrete-time terms, which consider the overall function information.
The remainder of this article is as follows. In “Preliminaries” section, some preliminary knowledge is introduced, including necessary hypotheses, definitions and lemmas. The main theorems are stated and proven in “Main results” section. In “Numerical simulation” section, we demonstrate the effectiveness of main results by means of numerical experiments. Finally, conclusions are drawn in “Conclusion” section.
Preliminaries
Notations: Set
, where i, j, k represent imaginary units whose operations satisfy Hamilton rules, i.e.
The conjugate of m is
, the modulus of
is
. Besides, for
, set
be the modulus of
, and
,
be the norm of
, where
is the conjugate transpose of
. For a function
,
. Let
,
.
Set
![]() |
,
is called t to the m rising30. Besides, set
![]() |
where
, and
,
.
Definition 1
31 The nabla discrete fractional sum is
![]() |
where
,
,
.
Definition 2
32 The Riemann-Liouville fractional difference is
![]() |
where
,
,
. For convenience,
is short for
in the following.
Definition 3
33 For
,
, and
with the real part of
is positive, the nabla discrete Mittag–Leffler function with two parameters is defined as
![]() |
Lemma 1
Let
be a function, then
![]() |
holds, where
,
.
Proof
. Let
, then according to Lemma 1 in34, when
, it holds that
![]() |
1 |
Set
, where
. Then, it follows from (1) that
![]() |
On the other hand,
![]() |
thus,
![]() |
holds, if
.
Now, set
, i.e.,
. Hence,
can be also deemed as a complex-valued function, the proof is accomplished.
Lemma 2
Let
be a decrescent scalar function defined on
. If there exists a constant
satisfying
![]() |
then it holds that
![]() |
Proof
. Considering that
is equivalent to
. Then, by virtue of Lemma 6 in35, the above conclusion is correct.
Consider the following model
![]() |
2 |
where
,
,
denotes the state,
,
are the connection weights,
represents the time delay,
is the external input, and
signifies the activation function.
For
,
is supposed to satisfy the following condition
![]() |
where
.
The connection weights are defined as
![]() |
where the switching jump
.
Remark 1
As is known, the memristive connections are switching between two distinct values, which indicates that the value of the connection at a fixed time must be in
, where
,
. Therefore, it is necessary to determine which one is bigger between
and
. Based on the comparing principle for quaternions (vector ordering approach in36), the values of
,
,
and
can be readily obtained.
Then, system (2) could be expressed as below
![]() |
3 |
Obviously, there exists
and
satisfying
![]() |
4 |
The measurement of (2) is
![]() |
5 |
where
signifies the measurement output, and
are constants.
Now, the estimator is given by
![]() |
6 |
with
![]() |
7 |
and
,
is the estimator control gain. Hence,
![]() |
8 |
Similarly, there exists
and
such that
![]() |
9 |
Define
, the error system would be described as
![]() |
10 |
In recent years, the quaternion-valued system has demonstrated exceptional performance in single-image dehazing37 and associative memory38. This insight will serve as our foundation to construct some efficient results for the estimation of memristive systems. In order to arrive at this objective, we shall give the following definition.
Definition 4
System (10) is referred as globally Mittag–Leffler stable, if there have
,
satisfying
![]() |
where
,
and
.
Main results
Theorem 1
Let
be given, the error system (10) is globally Mittag–Leffler stable, if there exist scalars
,
,
such that
![]() |
hold.
Proof
. Consider a candidate function as below
![]() |
11 |
Before moving on, the following tight estimation is necessary
![]() |
12 |
Thus, the derivative of
along with (10) can be enlarged as
![]() |
13 |
It then follows directly from Lemma 2.5 in34 that
![]() |
14 |
Analogously, it can be decuced that
![]() |
15 |
and
![]() |
16 |
where
, with
.
Applying (14)–(16) to (13), it will modify
to
![]() |
17 |
Based on the Razumikhin condition
![]() |
one has
![]() |
18 |
Therefore, it follows from Lemma 2 that
![]() |
It is apparent to observe from (11) that
![]() |
19 |
Hence,
![]() |
20 |
then based on Definition 3 (where
), one can conclude that (10) is globally Mittag–Leffler stable.
Remark 2
It is worth pointing out that we can attain Mittag–Leffler stability condition via constructing an appropriate function in Theorem 1. We will now proceed to investigate the stability conclusion by establishing a brand new function, and the correspongding results are presented as follows.
Theorem 2
Let
be specified, the error system (10) can achieve the stable performance, if there exist scalars
,
,
satisfying
![]() |
Proof
Construct the following candidate function
![]() |
21 |
Following a similar idea as mentioned above, the derivative of
along with (10) can be calculated as
![]() |
which further implies that (10) is globally asymptotically stable.
Remark 3
As a side note, by choosing different estimation controllers and auxiliary functions, we can obtain various stability conclusions. For instance, if (7) is taken as
![]() |
then the Mittag–Leffler quasi-state estimation result can be derived.
Numerical simulation
Example 1
Considering a two-dimensional system (2), in which the parameters are described as
![]() |
Besides,
,
,
, the activation function is
, which implies that
. Additionally, we suppose
,
,
,
,
,
,
. Then, one can make a simple calculation according to the following two criteria
![]() |
thus
, and it is obvious that
, which means
![]() |
On the other hand, let
, one has
![]() |
Simulation resuls are illustrated in Figs. 1234, which confirm the stability trend of the original system according to Theorem 1. Preliminary experiments are in line with our theoretical findings.
Figure 1.
Transient behaviors of system state
, state estimation and error state
.
Figure 2.
Transient behaviors of system state
, state estimation and error state
.
Figure 3.
Transient behaviors of system state
, state estimation and error state
.
Figure 4.
Transient behaviors of system state
, state estimation and error state
.
Conclusion
State estimation of memristive systems with fractional derivative and discrete-time term presents a significant challenge. In this work, we demonstrate that by employing discrete fractional calculus and a functional incorporating a discrete fractional sum element, the state estimation problem for such systems can be effectively addressed. The proposed results are not only applicable to the study of memristive systems but also offer a more efficient approach for exploring systems with quaternion elements. Importantly, the proposed method integrates the advantages of vector optimization techniques, providing deeper insights into achieving a meaningful convex closure. A numerical example is included to validate the effectiveness of state estimator in determining the system’s actual states.
Author contributions
Qun Huang conceived the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation, and revised the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Nantong Municipality under Grant No. JC2024008 and the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission under Grant No. KJZD-K202201202.
Data availability
In this paper, numerical simulation is used to carry out the experiment, and all the data have been presented in the manuscript.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Chua, L. O. Memristor-the missing circut element. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory18, 507–519 (1971). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chua, L. O. & Kang, S. M. Memristive devices and systems. Proc. IEEE64(2), 209–223 (1976). [Google Scholar]
-
3.Li, L., Xu, R. & Lin, J. Lagrange stability for uncertain memristive neural networks with L
vy noise and leakage delay. XXPhys. A549, 124167 (2020). [Google Scholar] - 4.Sun, B. et al. Sliding mode stabilization of memristive neural networks with leakage delays and control disturbance. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.32(3), 1254–1263 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu, A. & Zeng, Z. Global Mittag-Leffler stabilization of fractional-order memristive neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.28, 206–217 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pratap, A. et al. Finite-time Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order quaternion-valued memristive neural networks with impulses. Neural Process. Lett.51, 1485–1526 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dong, S., Zhu, H., Zhong, S., Shi, K. & Liu, Y. New study on fixed-time synchronization control of delayed inertial memristive neural networks. Appl. Math. Comput.399, 126035 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng, J. et al. Proportional-integral observer-based state estimation for Markov memristive neural networks with sensor saturations. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.35(1), 405–416 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wei, R., Cao, J. & Huang, C. Lagrange exponential stability of quaternion-valued memristive neural networks with time delays. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.43(12), 7269–7291 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yao, W., Wang, C., Sun, Y., Gong, S. & Lin, H. Event-triggered control for robust exponential synchronization of inertial memristive neural networks under parameter disturbance. Neural Netw.164, 67–80 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He, S., Liu, J., Wang, H. & Sun, K. A discrete memristive neural network and its application for character recognition. Neurocomputing523, 1–8 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Greenblatt, A. B. & Agaian, S. S. Introducing quaternion multi-valued neural networks with numerical examples. Inf. Sci.423, 326–342 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matsui, N., Isokawa, T., Kusamichi, H., Peper, F. & Nishimura, H. Quaternion neural network with geometrical operators, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. Appl. Eng. Technol.15, 149–164 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ujang, B., Took, C. & Mandic, D. Quaternion-valued nonlinear adaptive filtering. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.22, 1193–1206 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tu, Z., Yang, X., Wang, L. & Ding, N. Stability and stabilization of quaternion-valued neural networks with uncertain time-delayed impulses: direct quaternion method. XXPhys. A535, 122358 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Song, Q. & Chen, X. Multistability analysis of quaternion-valued neural networks with time delays. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.29, 5430–5440 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Lu, J., Cao, J. & Rutkowski, L. Constrained quaternion-variable convex optimization: a quaternion-valued recurrent neural network approach. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.31, 1022–1035 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang, Q., Yu, Y. & Cao, J. Projective synchronization of inertial quaternion-valued neural networks via non-reduced order approach. Neural Process. Lett.56(1), 21 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rajchakit, G., Chanthorn, P., Kaewmesri, P., Sriraman, R. & Lim, C. P. Global Mittag-Leffler stability and stabilization analysis of fractional-order quaternion-valued memristive neural networks. Mathematics8(3), 422 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pratap, A. et al. Finite-time Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order quaternion-valued memristive neural networks with impulses. Neural Process. Lett.51(2), 1485–1526 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen, X., Song, Q., Li, Z., Zhao, Z. & Liu, Y. Stability analysis of continuous-time and discrete-time quaternion-valued neural networks with linear threshold neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.29, 2769–2781 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peng, T., Wu, Y., Tu, Z., Alofi, A. S. & Lu, J. Fixed-time and prescribed-time synchronization of quaternion-valued neural networks: A control strategy involving Lyapunov functions. Neural Netw.160, 108–121 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xiong, K., Hu, C. & Yu, J. Direct approach-based synchronization of fully quaternion-valued neural networks with inertial term and time-varying delay. Chaos Solitons Fractals172, 113556 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu, H., Wang, Z., Shen, B. & Liu, X. Event-triggered H-infinity state estimation for delayed stochastic memristive neural networks with missing measurements: the discrete time case. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.29, 3726–3737 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bao, H., Park, J. & Cao, J. Non-fragile state estimation for fractional-order delayed memristive BAM neural networks. Neural Netw.119, 190–199 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li, Q., Liang, J., Gong, W., Wang, K. & Wang, J. Nonfragile state estimation for semi-Markovian switching CVNs with general uncertain transition rates: An event-triggered scheme. Math. Comput. Simul.218, 204–222 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li, R., Gao, X., Cao, J. & Zhang, K. Dissipativity and exponential state estimation for quaternion-valued memristive neural networks. Neurocomputing363, 236–245 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang, S., Wang, Z., Dong, H. & Chen, Y. Recursive state estimation for stochastic nonlinear non-Gaussian systems using energy-harvesting sensors: A quadratic estimation approach. Automatica147, 110671 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zheng, Q., Xu, S. & Du, B. Asynchronous resilent state estimation of switched fuzzy systems with multiple state impulsive jumps. IEEE Trans. Cybern.53(12), 7966–7979 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.M. Bohner, & A. Peterson. Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales.
- 31.Atici, F. M. & Eloe, P. Discrete fractional calculus with the nabla operator. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2009(3), 1–12 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abdeljawad, T. & Atici, F. M. On the definitions of nabla fractional operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal.2012, 1–9 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 33.You, X., Song, Q. & Zhao, Z. Global Mittag-Leffler stability and synchronization of discrete-time fractional-order complex-valued neural networks with time delay. Neural Netw.122, 382–394 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gu, Y., Wang, H. & Yu, Y. Synchronization for fractional-order discrete-time neural networks with time delays. Appl. Math. Comput.372, 124995 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 35.You, X., Song, Q. & Zhao, Z. Global Mittag-Leffler stability and synchronization of discrete-time fractional-order complex-valued neural networks with time delay. Neural Netw.122, 382–394 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li, R., Gao, X. & Cao, J. Quasi-state estimation and quasi-synchronization control of quaternion-valued fractional-order fuzzy memristive neural networks: vector ordering approach. Appl. Math. Comput.362, 124572 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Frants, V., Agaian, S. & Panetta, K. QCNN-H: Single-image dehazing using quaternion neural networks. IEEE Trans. Cybern.53(9), 5448–5458 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang, Z., Liang, X., Lan, J. & Zhang, X. Global exponential stability of quaternion bidirectional associative memory neural networks with multiple delays. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.47(9), 7165–7181 (2024). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
In this paper, numerical simulation is used to carry out the experiment, and all the data have been presented in the manuscript.

















































