Skip to main content
Animal Bioscience logoLink to Animal Bioscience
. 2025 Jun 10;38(12):2537–2544. doi: 10.5713/ab.25.0122

Multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase: a hidden phytate digester with bioactive function potential in animal husbandry: review

Jaiesoon Cho 1,*
PMCID: PMC12580751  PMID: 40506034

Abstract

The objective of this review was to describe the enzymatic properties of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase (MINPP1/MIPP) as an unusual member of histidine acid phosphatase, distinct from conventional microbial phytases and their additional physiological functions besides degrading phytate. Considering parameters such as pH activity profile, substrate specificity, catalytic efficiency, and stability, MINPP1 is of merit as a novel phytase source for developing an ideal feed additive supported by functional metagenomics fused with recombinant DNA technology and classical protein engineering. In addition, MINPP1 appears to be involved in some biological activities such as cell survival, stress, lipopolysaccharide and inorganic polyphosphate-induced inflammatory response, milk fatty acid composition-related metabolism and bone-related growth and pathophysiology, which can be important for the production performance of farm animals. Future directions need profound studies revealing the direct effects of MINPP1 on these physiological events.

Keywords: Farm Animals, Multiple Inositol Polyphosphate Phosphatase, Physiological Events, Phytase, Phytate

INTRODUCTION

Up to now, phytase has remarkably contributed to the improvement of bioavailability of phosphorus and other nutrients such as minerals and protein in sectors of swine nutrition, poultry nutrition, and aquaculture, solving issues of environmental phosphorus pollution [13]. In the global enzyme market, the business of phytase is still a hot spot. It has been estimated that the phytase market size will be grown to 624 million USD by the year 2026 [4]. Commercial phytases have been largely established from bacterial and fungal sources [4].

Some studies have investigated biological functions of phytase beyond the nutritional aspect to dephosphorylate phytate, also named as inositol hexaphosphate (InsP6) [516]. For instance, supplemental phytase can affect the taxonomic profile of bacterial metagenome in the ceca of growing pigs [13] and change plasma metabolome profile in broiler chickens [14], which might be associated with host physiology and health. Phytase also appears to improve the immune response in fish [15,16]. However, details of these mechanisms remain unclear and poorly understood (Table 1).

Table 1.

The outline of the most recent positive results beyond the nutritional aspect on supplemental phytase in poultry and pig

Animal Action mode Enzyme source Ref.
Broiler chickens Inhibition of harmful bacteria including Pelomonas, Helicobacter, and Pseudomonas VTR Biotech (2,000 FTU/kg diet) [5]
Broiler chickens Inhibition of harmful bacteria including Escherichia coli and Clostridium spp. BASF (500 FTU/kg) [6]
Broiler chickens Elevation of GSH-Px, CAT, SOD, and total antioxidant capacity
Reduction in serum MDA
Meriden Animal Health (5,000 FTU/kg) [7]
Nursery pigs Inhibition of harmful bacteria including Prevotellaceae CJ Bio (2,000 FTU/kg) [8]
Nursery pigs Decrease of the plasma MDA Quantum Blue AB Vista (500 FTU/kg) [9]
Growing-finishing pigs Inhibition of harmful bacteria including Tenericutes and Spirochaetes Wuhan Sunhy Biology (500 U/kg) [10]
Growing-finising pigs Decrease of IL-1β and TNF-α release in the jejunal mucosa
Elevation of GSH-Px and CAT activities in the duodenum and ileum
Challenge International Trade (1,000 U/kg) [11]

GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; TNF-α, tumor-necrosis factor-alpha.

Ongoing study concerning finding new bioactive phytase sourses with potential action of physiology as well as desirable catalytic efficiency of phytate is worthwhile to open up a new market in the existing feed industry. In this regard, multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase (MINPP1/MIPP) can be a good alternative (Table 2). The catalytic function of MINPP1 has been mainly reported from animal and plant [1719]. However, it has been recently identified from prokaryotes such as gut and soil bacteria [2023]. Although it is not well known, this unusual enzyme can be categorized into a subgroup of histidine acid phosphatase (HAP) family, to which commercially representative microbial phytases such as Escherichia coli and Aspergillus sp. phytases belong [23,24]. Interestingly, MINPP1 has been reported to be associated with a variety of physiological events [18,2534]. This short review concentrates on the enzymatic evaluation of MINPP1 as a digester of phytate and its potential bioactive functions that have never been expected, which might be effectively applied in animal husbandry.

Table 2.

The summary of the representative physiological studies on MINPP1 since the year 2015

Species Expected effect Ref.
Human, mouse Regulation of human brain development and homeostasis [31,32]
Human, mouse Regulation of ER stress and apoptosis [30]
Human Down-regulation in HBV-positive HCC and repressing the proliferation and migration of the tumor cells [33]
Dairy cattle Potential SNP candidate marker for milk fatty acid traits [49]
Broiler chickens Regulation of myo-Ins metabolism in blood and feather [34]
Common carp Up-regulatory candidate gene in glucose metabolism under temperature stress [55]

ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; myo-Ins, myo-inositol.

BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MINPP1

Motif analysis

Based on protein structures, microbial phytases of the HAP family are typically characterized by two conserved motifs such as the active-site heptapeptide, Arg-His-Gly-x-Arg-x-Pro (RHGxRxP) and the proton donor dipeptide, His-Asp (HD) [24,35]. However, the proton donor sequence in avian, human, wheat, barley, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (Bt), Acinetobacter sp. (AC 1-2), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (PhypA) and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis (PhylA) MINPP1 is replaced by a tripeptide, His-Ala-Glu (HAE) [1723]. AC 1-2, phypA and phylA MINPP1 have the modified heptapeptide active-site motif, Arg-His-Gly-Ser-Arg-Gly-Leu (RHGSRGL), instead of the RHGxRxP [2123]. In addition, eukaryotic MINPP1s contain a typical Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu (KDEL)-like endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention tetrapeptide sequence at their C-terminal ends [36]. SDEL and ADEL sequences are present in human and avian, respectively, while KT(Thr)EL is present in plants including barley and wheat [17,19]. In this regard, Yu et al [37] mentioned about the importance of MINPP1’s confinement to the ER, emphasizing that inositol lipid signaling and inositol phosphate metabolism can be independently regulated.

Optimum pH

In terms of the pH activity profile, microbial phytases of the HAP family work very well at acidic pH range of 2.5–5.5 with one or bi-hump pH optima [3840]. Their activities are almost inactivated at pH 6 [3840]. Even if plant (barley and wheat) and Bifidobacterium (phypA and phylA) MINPP1 show their single pH optima of 4.5 and 5.5, respectively [19,22,23], bacterial MINPP1 including Bt and AC 1–2 possess multiple pH optima [20,21]. Avian, Bt and AC 1–2 MINPP1 are also effective at pH 7.4 [17,20,21]. Such a relatively broad pH range of the activity in these enzymes will be of merit for applying them to gastrointestinal tracts of farm animals with variable pH spectra.

Enzyme kinetics

Considering kinetic parameters of three representative microbial phytases, the Km value (μM) indicating the substrate affinity was 660–1,030 for phytate in E. coli, 138–4,700 for phytate in Bacillus sp., and 27–124 for phytate in Aspergillus ficuum (niger) [3841]. The Vmax value (μmol/min/mg) indicating the maximal reaction velocity was 89–117 for phytate in E. coli, 1.32–49.01 for phytate in Bacillus sp., and 180–216 for phytate in Aspergillus ficuum (niger) [3841]. In particular, the Vmax value of Aspergillus phytase was almost identical to those of Bt and AC 1–2 MINPP1 (Table 3). In addition, the catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) of avian MINPP1 was 4-fold higher than that of Bacillus licheniformis PB-13 phytase [42].

Table 3.

Enzymatic properties characterized by the known MINPP1s for phytate

Sources Km (μM) Vmax (μmol/min/mg) Optimum pH Optimum temperature (°C) Mol. mass (kDa) estimated Ref.
Avian 140 0.715 5–6
7.5
- 48 [17]
Human 90 0.0062 - - 55 [17,18]
Wheat 246–393 - 4.5 65 54 [19]
Barley 334–517 - 4.5 65 54 [19]
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (Bt) 18.4 178 2.5
4
7.5
55 49 [20]
Acinetobacter sp. (AC1–2) 650 228 3
4.5–5
6
- 51 [21]
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (PhypA) - - 5.5 50 - [22]
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis (PhylA) - - 5.5 50 - [22]

-, not available.

Substrate specificity

The substrate specificity of avian and AC 1–2 MINPP1 for phytate was strict because the hydrolysis for p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), a universal acid phosphatase substrate was less than 26% of the phytase activity [17,21]. Activities of pNPP and other phosphorylated conjugates by phypA and phylA MINPP1 were below 7% of phytase activity [22], showing highly strict substrate specificity. In particular, avian MINPP1 was more effective in hydrolyzing a physiologically genuine phytate pentamagnesium salt (Mg-InsP6) than commercial Aspergillus niger (ficuum) phytase [17]. Meanwhile, phosphatase activities for pNPP in barley and wheat MINPP1 were about 50% of the phytase activity [19]. These enzymes can hydrolyze ortho-carboxyphenyl phosphate with the same level as phytate [19], thus showing relatively broad substrate specificity. In this regard, it has been recently reported that wheat MINPP1 can degrade phosphorylated inflammatory substrates such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and inorganic polyphosphates (poly P) [43,44].

Positional specificity

Most of the commercially available microbial phytases such as Aspergillus niger and Bacillus sp. are known as 3-phytases (EC 3.1.3.8) for catalyzing the initial release of phosphate linked at the 3’-position on the six carbon ring structure of phytate, while E. coli has a 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) activity [21,41]. However, plant, animal, and bacterial MINPP1 including phypA, phylA, AC 1–2, and Bt lack the positional dephosphorylation specificity [1923,45,46].

Effect of metal ions on the enzyme activity

Phytase activities of wheat and barley MINPP1 are severely inhibited in the presence of Cu2+ or Zn2+ [19]. Low concentration (1 mM) of Ca2+ can act as an inhibitor for these enzymes [19]. In contrast, AC 1–2 MINPP1 is unaffected by the addition of Zn2+ [21], known as the strongest inhibitor of commercial Aspergillus phytase [47]. The phytase activity is stimulated in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+ [21], which has been reported as a stabilizing agent in catalytic functions of β–propeller Bacillus phytase [41]. In the case of phypA and phylA MINPP1, 2 mM of Ca2+ can stimulate phylA, but not phypA [22]. However, both enzymes are inhibited by higher concentrations (over 4 mM) of Ca2+ [22].

Stability

Both phypA and phylA MINPP1 have good thermal stabilities with 73% and 44% of their initial activities retained at 80°C after 15 min, respectively [22]. Storage stability at room temperature is one of important factors when evaluating the quality of a commercial phytase product [48]. In some cases, the symptom of rickets in pigs is associated with poor inventory management of phytase after a long-term storage for 6 to 12 months [48]. According to Sulabo et al [48], six commercially available phytases maintained about 70% of their initial activities after storage at room temperature for 120 days. Meanwhile, the AC 1–2 MINPP1 was extremely stable after more than three years of storage [21].

BIOACTIVE FUNCTIONS OF MINPP1

A potential modifier for milk fatty acid traits in dairy cattle

Genome-wide association studies such as single nucleotide polymorphism have suggested that MINPP1 may modulate the composition of milk fatty acids in dairy cattle [49]. For example, Chinese Holstein cows with g. 9207070A>G bearing the intron 5 mutation of MINPP1 show a significant increase of C6:0 (hexanoic acid) but a significant decrease of C17:0 (heptadecanoic acid) [49]. Previously, intron mutation has been reported to be involved in developmental and cell-specific expression and over-expression of certain genes [50,51]. Presumably, MINPP1can affect on fatty acid related-metabolism by up-regulating the release of 2-phosphoglycerate from 2,3-bisphosphorglycerate, a negative allosteric regulator of hemoglobin in the unusual Rapport-Luebering glycolytic shunt, resulting in bypassing 3-phosphoglycerate of the common glycolysis [18], which can stimulate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling involved in the elevation of fatty acid oxidation [52]. Consequently, further investigation needs to validate the direct regulatory effect of MINPP1 on compositional change of milk fatty acids in dairy cattle by knock-out, RNA interference, or gene editing approach [49].

A potential additive for improving animal health

Wheat MINPP1 is effective in dephosphorylating LPS and long-chain inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) [43,44]. These two substrates are closely associated with sectors of animal husbandry. The former is a well-known pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). It is an endotoxin with structurally-phosphorylated toxic lipid A moiety borne from Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria and easily detectable as suspended dusts in swine and poultry farms [43]. The latter is a linear compound with about 200 to 1,000 phosphate residues linked by phosphodiester bond. It can act as a virulent factor in enteric disease-inducing bacteria including Salmonella typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni frequently found in contaminated animal-resource foods [44,53].

According to An and Cho [43], LPS treated with wheat MINPP1 can significantly repress the release of interleukin (IL)-8, a universal pro-inflammatory cytokine, in HT-29 (an intestinal epithelial cell line) and reduce the cytotoxicity in HAE aortic endothelial cells. Long-chain polyP dephosphorylated by MINPP1 can also inhibit the secretion of IL-8 in HT-29 by deactivating nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) [54]. Moreover, long-chain polyP digested with MINPP1 can improve nitric oxide (NO) production and in vitro phagocytic activity in Raw 264.7, a murine macrophage cell line [53]. Taken together, it appears that wheat MINPP1 functions as an immune-modulatory agent.

Another study has revealed that the exosome-enveloped human MINPP1 isoform-2 can function as a stimulator of tumor cell growth in a human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7 under cellular stress induced by brefeldin A, a known pharmacological protein trafficking inhibitor [29]. Human MINPP1 is known as an ER-based stress responder [30]. Under long-term temperature stress, common carp (Cyprinus carpio) MINPP1 was one of the target genes involved in the regulation of glycolysis by the action of down-regulated micro RNAs (mi RNAs) [55] closely associated with heat stress in some vertebrates such as mice and Holstein cows [56,57]. As a stress alleviator, wheat MINPP1 can enhance cell viability by releasing IL-8 or IL-6 in a human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, HT-29 exposed to inflammatory nucleotides such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and uridine diphosphate (UDP), suggesting that MINPP1 might be a modulator of the growth and functions of intestinal epithelial cells under luminal ATP and UDP stimuli in the gut [58].

A potential regulator of bone-related physiology

Chondrocyte differentiation is a main cellular event of skeletogenesis [27]. During the chondrocyte developmental process in some animals such as mouse, rat, chick and rabbit, it has been reported that MINPP1 expression is detectable in chondrocytes transiting from proliferation to hypertrophy [25,27,28]. In this regard, mechanisms on the catalytic function of MINPP1 remain puzzling since cellular inositol pentaphosphate (InsP5) and InsP6 pools as main substrates of the enzyme show no substantial changes in a mouse chondrogenic ATDC5 cell line with MINPP1 stably over-expressed [27]. Rather, the cell line overexpressing MINPP1 was defect of chondrogenesis [27]. Even MINPP1 knock-out mice have shown normal chondrocyte differentiation and bone development [59]. On the other hand, MINPP1 has been identified as one of suggestive genetic correlation signals in hand osteoarthritis (OA) using a human plasma proteome-based approach [60], although its functional role in OA development is poorly understood.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

In terms of catalytic properties, MINPP1 is a promising alternative for phytate degradation. It can be compared to conventional microbial phytase. Still, soil and gut microbiomes are attractive sources for exploring a novel MINPP1 producer [61]. Recent advances on functional metagenomics fused with classical enzyme engineering and recombinant DNA technology can accelerate to develop MINPP1 as an ideal phytase [62].

MINPP1 can act as an anti-inflammatory agent by repressing IL-8 secretion under LPS and inorganic polyphosphate-induced stimuli, and improve the viability of the intestinal epithelial cells exposed to extracellular nucleotides such as ATP and UDP [43,54,58]. The MINPP1 gene appears to be a genetic marker in bone and OA development [59,60], and a molecular target for the modulation of milk fatty acid composition [49]. Taken together, MINPP1 may work favorably for the production performance of farm animals. Profound studies revealing the direct effect of MINPP1 on these physiological events are needed in the future.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

The article is prepared by a single author.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

No AI tools were used in this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Moita VHC, Kim SW. Nutritional and functional roles of phytase and xylanase enhancing the intestinal health and growth of nursery pigs and broiler chickens. Animals. 2022;12:3322. doi: 10.3390/ani12233322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farhat-Khemakhem A, Blibech M, Boukhris I, Makni M, Chouayekh H. Assessment of the potential of the multi-enzyme producer Bacillus amyloliquefaciens US573 as alternative feed additive. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98:1208–15. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar V, Sinha AK, Makkar HPS, De Boeck G, Becker K. Phytate and phytase in fish nutrition. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2012;96:335–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou Y, Anoopkumar AN, Tarafdar A, et al. Microbial engineering for the production and application of phytases to the treatment of the toxic pollutants: a review. Environ Pollut. 2022;308:119703. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moita VHC, Duarte ME, Kim SW. Supplemental effects of phytase on modulation of mucosa-associated microbiota in the jejunum and the impacts on nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and bone parameters in broiler chickens. Animals. 2021;11:3351. doi: 10.3390/ani11123351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nari N, Ghasemi HA, Hajkhodadadi I, Farahani AHK. Intestinal microbial ecology, immune response, stress indicators, and gut morphology of male broiler chickens fed low-phosphorus diets supplemented with phytase, butyric acid, or Saccharomyces boulardii. Livest Sci. 2020;234:103975. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Derakhshan M, Ghasemian SO, Gholami-Ahangaran M. The effects of probiotic and phytase on growth performance, biochemical parameters and antioxidant capacity in broiler chickens. Vet Med Sci. 2023;9:860–6. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 8.Moita VHC, Kim SW. Efficacy of a bacterial 6-phytase supplemented beyond traditional dose levels on jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota, ileal nutrient digestibility, bone parameters, and intestinal health, and growth performance of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2023;101:skad134. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ren P, Chen J, Wedekind K, Hancock D, Vázquez-Añón M. Interactive effects of zinc and copper sources and phytase on growth performance, mineral digestibility, bone mineral concentrations, oxidative status, and gut morphology in nursery pigs. Transl Anim Sci. 2020;4:783–98. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu F, Li J, Ni H, Azad MAK, Mo K, Yin Y. The effects of phytase and non-starch polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzymes on trace element deposition, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of growing–finishing pigs. Animals. 2023;13:549. doi: 10.3390/ani13040549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang LH, Liu HS, Liu SJ, Piao XS. Dietary supplementation with 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and phytase in growing-finishing pigs: II. Effects on intestinal antioxidant status, immunity and bone quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2021;280:115065. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Valente DT, Junior, Genova JL, Kim SW, Saraiva A, Rocha GC. Carbohydrases and phytase in poultry and pig nutrition: a review beyond the nutrients and energy matrix. Animals. 2024;14:226. doi: 10.3390/ani14020226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klinsoda J, Vötterl J, Koger S, Metzler-Zebeli BU. Dietary phytase- and lactic acid-treated cereals caused greater taxonomic adaptations than functional adaptations in the cecal metagenome of growing pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:e02240–20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02240-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gonzalez-Uarquin F, Kenéz Á, Rodehutscord M, Huber K. Dietary phytase and myo-inositol supplementation are associated with distinct plasma metabolome profile in broiler chickens. Animal. 2020;14:549–59. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hu J, Ran C, He S, et al. Dietary microbial phytase exerts mixed effects on the gut health of tilapia: a possible reason for the null effect on growth promotion. Br J Nutr. 2016;115:1958–66. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abo Norag MA, El-Shenawy AM, Fadl SE, et al. Effect of phytase enzyme on growth performance, serum biochemical alteration, immune response and gene expression in Nile tilapia. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;80:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cho J, Choi K, Darden T, Reynolds PR, Petitte JN, Shears SB. Avian multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase is an active phytase that can be engineered to help ameliorate the planet’s “phosphate crisis”. J Biotechnol. 2006;126:248–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cho J, King JS, Qian X, Harwood AJ, Shears SB. Dephosphorylation of 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate by MIPP expands the regulatory capacity of the Rapoport–Luebering glycolytic shunt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5998–6003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710980105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dionisio G, Holm PB, Brinch-Pedersen H. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatases (MINPPs) are phytases expressed during grain filling and germination. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5:325–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stentz R, Osborne S, Horn N, et al. A bacterial homolog of a eukaryotic inositol phosphate signaling enzyme mediates cross-kingdom dialog in the mammalian gut. Cell Rep. 2014;6:646–56. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rix GD, Sprigg C, Whitfield H, Hemmings AM, Todd JD, Brearley CA. Characterisation of a soil MINPP phytase with remarkable long-term stability and activity from Acinetobacter sp. PLOS ONE. 2022;17:0272015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tamayo-Ramos JA, Sanz-Penella JM, Yebra MJ, Monedero V, Haros M. Novel phytases from Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum ATCC 27919 and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5013–5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00782-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Acquistapace IM, Zi¸etek MA, Li AWH, et al. Snapshots during the catalytic cycle of a histidine acid phytase reveal an induced-fit structural mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:17724–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh B, Satyanarayana T. Fungal phytases: characteristics and amelioration of nutritional quality and growth of non-ruminants. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2015;99:646–60. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Caffrey JJ, Hidaka K, Matsuda M, Hirata M, Shears SB. The human and rat forms of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase: functional homology with a histidine acid phosphatase up-regulated during endochondral ossification. FEBS Lett. 1999;442:99–104. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01636-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Windhorst S, Lin H, Blechner C, et al. Tumour cells can employ extracellular Ins(1,2,3,4,5,6)P6 and multiple inositol-polyphosphate phosphatase 1 (MINPP1) dephosphorylation to improve their proliferation. Biochem J. 2013;450:115–25. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hidaka K, Kanematsu T, Caffrey JJ, Takeuchi H, Shears SB, Hirata M. The importance to chondrocyte differentiation of changes in expression of the multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase. Exp Cell Res. 2003;290:254–64. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00337-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Romano PR, Wang J, O’Keefe RJ, Puzas JE, Rosier RN, Reynolds PR. HiPER1, a phosphatase of the endoplasmic reticulum with a role in chondrocyte maturation. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:803–13. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.6.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zubair M, Hamzah R, Griffin R, Ali N. Identification and functional characterization of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase1 (Minpp1) isoform-2 in exosomes with potential to modulate tumor microenvironment. PLOS ONE. 2022;17:e0264451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kilaparty SP, Agarwal R, Singh P, Kannan K, Ali N. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis accompanies enhanced expression of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase 1 (Minpp1): a possible role for Minpp1 in cellular stress response. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2016;21:593–608. doi: 10.1007/s12192-016-0684-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ucuncu E, Rajamani K, Wilson MSC, et al. MINPP1 prevents intracellular accumulation of the chelator inositol hexakisphosphate and is mutated in pontocerebellar hypoplasia. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6087. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19919-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Appelhof B, Wagner M, Hoefele J, et al. Pontocerebellar hypoplasia due to bi-allelic variants in MINPP1. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29:411–21. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00749-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen W, Jiang J, Gong L, et al. Hepatitis B virus P protein initiates glycolytic bypass in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma via a FOXO3/miRNA-30b-5p/MINPP1 axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:1. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01803-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Greene E, Mallmann B, Wilson JW, Cowieson AJ, Dridi S. Monitoring phytate hydrolysis using serial blood sampling and feather myo-inositol levels in broilers. Front Physiol. 2020;11:736. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rigden DJ. The histidine phosphatase superfamily: structure and function. Biochem J. 2008;409:333–48. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kilaparty SP, Singh A, Baltosser WH, Ali N. Computational analysis reveals a successive adaptation of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase 1 in higher organisms through evolution. Evol Bioinform. 2014;10:239–50. doi: 10.4137/EBO.S18948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yu J, Leibiger B, Yang SN, Shears SB, et al. Multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase compartmentalization separates inositol phosphate metabolism from inositol lipid signaling. Biomolecules. 2023;13:885. doi: 10.3390/biom13060885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodriguez E, Han Y, Lei XG. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of an Escherichia coli acid phosphatase/phytase gene (appA2) isolated from pig colon. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;257:117–23. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ullah AHJ, Sethumadhavan K, Mullaney EJ, et al. Cloned and expressed fungal phyA gene in alfalfa produces a stable phytase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290:1343–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ullah AHJ, Sethumadhavan K, Mullaney EJ, Ziegelhoffer T, Austin-Phillips S. Fungal phyA gene expressed in potato leaves produces active and stable phytase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306:603–9. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao T, Yong X, Zhao Z, Dolce V, Li Y, Curcio R. Research status of Bacillus phytase. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:415. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02964-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar V, Singh G, Sangwan P, Verma AK, Agrawal S. Cloning, sequencing, and in silico analysis of β-propeller phytase Bacillus licheniformis strain PB-13. Biotechnol Res Int. 2014;2014:841353. doi: 10.1155/2014/841353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.An J, Cho J. Wheat phytase can alleviate the cellular toxic and inflammatory effects of lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021;63:114–24. doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.An J, Cho J. Catalytic properties of wheat phytase that favorably degrades long-chain inorganic polyphosphate. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33:127–31. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ali N, Craxton A, Sumner M, Shears SB. Effects of aluminium on the hepatic inositol polyphosphate phosphatase. Biochem J. 1995;305:557–61. doi: 10.1042/bj3050557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Craxton A, Caffrey JJ, Burkhart W, Safrany TS, Shears BS. Molecular cloning and expression of a rat hepatic multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase. Biochem J. 1997;328:75–81. doi: 10.1042/bj3280075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maenz DD, Engele-Schaan CM, Newkirk RW, Classen HL. The effect of minerals and mineral chelators on the formation of phytase-resistant and phytase-susceptible forms of phytic acid in solution and in a slurry of canola meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1999;81:177–92. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00085-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sulabo RC, Jones CK, Tokach MD, et al. Factors affecting storage stability of various commercial phytase sources. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:4262–71. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shi L, Liu L, Lv X, et al. Polymorphisms and genetic effects of PRLR, MOGAT1, MINPP1 and CHUK genes on milk fatty acid traits in Chinese Holstein. BMC Genet. 2019;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0769-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Callis J, Fromm M, Walbot V. Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Dev. 1987;1:1183–200. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Reddy VS, Reddy ASN. Developmental and cell-specific expression of ZWICHEL is regulated by the intron and exon sequences of its upstream protein-coding gene. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;54:273–93. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000028793.88757.8b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ballester M, Amills M, González-Rodríguez O, et al. Role of AMPK signalling pathway during compensatory growth in pigs. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:682. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5071-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.An J, Cho J. Potential immune-modulatory effects of wheat phytase on the performance of a mouse macrophage cell line, Raw 264.7, exposed to long-chain inorganic polyphosphate. Anim Biosci. 2021;34:463–70. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.An J, Cho J. Effect of long-chain inorganic polyphosphate treated with wheat phytase on interleukin 8 signaling in HT-29 cells. Anim Biosci. 2022;35:892–901. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun J, Liu Q, Zhao L, et al. Potential regulation by miRNAs on glucose metabolism in liver of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) at different temperatures. Comp Biochem Physiol D Genomics Proteomics. 2019;32:100628. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2019.100628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Islam A, Deuster PA, Devaney JM, Ghimbovschi S, Chen Y. An exploration of heat tolerance in mice utilizing mRNA and microRNA expression analysis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e72258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zheng Y, Chen K, Zheng X, Li H, Wang G. Identification and bioinformatics analysis of microRNAs associated with stress and immune response in serum of heat-stressed and normal Holstein cows. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2014;19:973–81. doi: 10.1007/s12192-014-0521-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.An J, Cho J. Wheat phytase potentially protects HT-29 cells from inflammatory nucleotides-induced cytotoxicity. Anim Biosci. 2023;36:1604–11. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chi H, Yang X, Kingsley PD, et al. Targeted deletion of Minpp1 provides new insight into the activity of multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6496–507. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.17.6496-6507.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu L, Wang S, Wen Y, et al. Assessing the genetic relationships between osteoarthritis and human plasma proteins: a large scale genetic correlation scan. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:677. doi: 10.21037/atm-19-4643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rix GD, Todd JD, Neal AL, Brearley CA. Improved sensitivity, accuracy and prediction provided by a high-performance liquid chromatography screen for the isolation of phytase-harbouring organisms from environmental samples. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14:1409–21. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vasudevan UM, Krishna S, Jalaja V, Pandey A. Microbial phytase: impact of advances in genetic engineering in revolutionizing its properties and applications. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245:1790–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Bioscience are provided here courtesy of Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP)

RESOURCES