Abstract
Lahore has been consistently ranked as the world’s most polluted city. Because of combative ideas to construct highways, underpasses and flyovers, Lahore had lost a remarkable percentage of its tree cover over the past 15 years. The present study focuses on the outcomes of rapidly increasing air pollution on roadside vegetation. In current study, species such as Alstonia scholaris L., Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd., Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus virens Aiton, Ficus benjamina L., Ficus religiosa Linn., Morus alba L., Murraya paniculata L., Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., Polyalthia longifolia Sonn., Rubia tinctorum L. found on the seven busiest roads of Lahore were selected (on the basis of traffic densities) for biomonitoring. These plants were selected due to their prevalence and commonly occurrence on these selected roads. Variation on biochemical parameters like chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll content & carotenoids and physiological parameters like stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate were found in triplicate. By analyzing these parameters quality of air and health of plants can also be assessed. In this study the dust load was maximum on the leaves of Alstonia scholaris L. (0.02 ± 0.005), Ficus religiosa Linn. (0.02 ± 0.003), and Morus alba L. (0.02 ± 0.003) Reduction in chlorophyll was noticed in Alstonia scholaris L. (0.44 ± 0.22) and Polyalthia longiflia Sonn. (0.41 ± 0.22) while the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16), followed by Ficus benjamina L. (0.80 ± 0.25), Ficus religiosa Linn. (0.81 ± 0.30), Ficus virens Aiton. (0.64 ± 0.22), Morus alba L. (1.80 ± 0.27) and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall. (2.55 ± 0.43), was higher at polluted sites. The reduction in carotenoid content was found in Murraya paniculata L. (4.12 ± 2.18) while it was highest in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (9.12 ± 0.71) Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of Alstonia scholaris L. (25.36 ± 13.10), Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. (34.37 ± 19.92), Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. (28.23 ± 11.25), Murraya paniculata L. (26.80 ± 7.75), Polyalthia longifolia Sonn. (42.27 ± 22.87), and Rubia tinctorum L. (30.60 ± 4.07) was observed. The current research distinctly signifies Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus benjamina L., Ficus religiosa Linn., Ficus virens Aiton., Morus alba L. and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., have capability to hold on the stress triggered by roadside pollutants. The findings are useful to urban green space landscapers in harsh climates as they choose appropriate species that can offer a variety of ecosystem services, such as resistance to air pollution and lowering of temperature without compromising plant survival.
Keywords: Green belt, Pollution, Urbanized city, Road avenue plants, Physiochemical attributes, Photosynthetic rate, Stomatal conductance, Transpiration rate, Chlorophyll content, Pollution mitigation
Introduction
Air pollution is one of the most serious environmental issue of the world now a days, which need immediate attention to be addressed at a global level by adopting friendly strategies. The majority of urban locations in developing as well as developed countries have air pollution concerns worldwide (Singh et al., 2020). The rapidly rising population, random urbanization, industrialization and extensive automobile use are contributing to a range of environmental challenges. Urban spaces are marked by unplanned developmental activities and lack of infrastructural strategies, contributed in deterioration of the quality of the environment with serious consequences for human well-being and regional biodiversity, particularly plants in urban environments (Skrynetska et al., 2018). The sharp rise in number of vehicles, industrial exhaust and the reduction in plant cover in metropolitan areas, are the primary contributors to air quality issues in cities (Sass et al., 2017). Air pollution caused by vehicles is an extremely sensitive threat to the environment for human society (Mukherjee et al., 2019). The principal contributions to air pollution concentrations in the atmosphere include anthropogenic and certain natural activities (Vardhan, Kumar & Panda, 2019). Among the largest and most common sources of these heavy metals are vehicular emissions that can have a negative impact on roadside vegetation (Sarhan, Elhafeez & Bashanday, 2021).
The growing number of vehicles and particulate matter loads contributes significantly to both regional and global environmental pollution. Industries emit massive amounts of harmful contaminants and toxins into the natural environment, including carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), and hydrocarbons, causing greenhouse emissions (Munsif et al., 2021). As one of the air contaminants, particulate matter in the atmosphere (PM2.5) is projected to cause 3.3 million premature deaths per year primarily in Asia and has a variety of harmful consequences on the well-being of humans (Nowak et al., 2018). Vehicular exhaust causes environmental harm in countries like Pakistan due to inadequately maintained automobiles and the use of low-quality fuel. Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (NOx), CO, sulfur dioxide (SO2), hydrocarbons (HCs), PM and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are all emitted by vehicles and account for 60% to 70% of metropolitan air pollution (Uka, Belford & Hogarh, 2019). These toxic substances directly contributed in bad health of the ecosystem, mainly the plants and soil (Nazarpour et al., 2019; Kaur et al., 2022).
Hence, biomonitoring of air pollution is crucial for urban restoration of ecosystems as pollutants adversely affect the environment (Sekhar & Sekhar, 2019). Various researchers have recognized the significance of plants in air pollution reduction (He et al., 2020). In addition to this, roadside plants offer an essential role in reducing air pollution since their enzymatic activity, physiological and anatomical characteristics aid in establishing and maintaining mitigation potential towards vehicular emissions (Khalil et al., 2022; Mahrukh Awan et al., 2023). Modification of leaf anatomical features play a pivotal role to control plant physiological activity (Kumar et al., 2022), including photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll concentration (Khalid et al., 2019). While these physicochemical changes are evidently marked on leaves of the plants under stress of pollution than any other part of the plant i.e., roots and stem (Wei et al., 2021). Plants thrive in polluted environments can provide an insight into the physiological, metabolic, and genetic mechanisms as tolerant or sensitive plant under stressed environmental conditions. Subsequently can be helpful in devising new strategies for preserving plant species against pollution (Roy, Battacharya & Kumari, 2020; Sahu, Basti & Sahu, 2020). Various organizations of life like fungi, lichens, tree rings, leaves, and barks of trees are studied by various researchers of the world. Vulnerable species, such as lichens, cannot thrive in densely crowded commercial and metropolitan environments. As a result, trees or shrubs may be used as ecological indicator species in urban settings to assess air quality (Ghafari et al., 2021) and to develop the green belts of specific plant species around urban areas to reduce the impact of airborne pollutants (Bharti, Trivedi & Kumar, 2018).
Inevitably, this region of the world has received the least attention and lacks an adequate air quality monitoring network. It is critical to analyze the degraded ambient air quality on a regular basis and to assess the effectiveness of mitigation strategies (Ghorbanian et al., 2020). The Air Quality Index (AQI) does not fulfill World Health Organization (WHO) air quality recommendations in many cities of Pakistan such as Lahore, Peshawar, Karachi and Islamabad, especially throughout the winter and autumn months (PAQI, 2018). As the capital of the Punjab province, Lahore has the highest aggregation of transportation in the city, contributing to the growth in air pollution. In the last decade, Lahore has been regarded as one of the most polluted cities in the world with variable unhealthy AQI, this year AQI recorded as 394. This air quality is measured with various concentrations of the pollutants like PM2.5 (Particulate Matter2.5), PM10 (coarse particulate matter, NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) and O3 ozone and AQI above 150 is considered very unhealthy (Staff Reporter, 2024). It was evidently noticed that there were several sectors which had the main contribution in drastic air quality of the city, these sectors include domestic, commercial, waste burning, agriculture (crop residue burning), industrial and transport with 0.11, 0.14, 3.6, 3.9, 4.07 and 83.15% share respectively. Among these sectors, the transport sector has the highest contributions in terms of air pollutants viz., CO (73%), non metallic volatile organic carbon (14%), sulfur oxide (SOx) (7%), NOx (4%), total suspended particles (1%) and PM2.5 (1%). Overall, the city of gardens (Lahore) is now facing the hazardous AQI index continuously from last few years (Ilyas & Nissar, 2022).
The purpose of present research work was to determine (1) the existing plant diversity of the city along busiest roads, (2) selection of the dominant plant species, (3) determination of the automobile exhaust (amount of dust), (4) evaluation of the response of plants through their growth (leaf width, length & area) and physiochemical attributes
Materials & Methods
The influences of vehicular pollution upon growth and physicochemical features of plants were investigated by selecting multiple roads of Lahore city.
Study site
Seven busiest roads of the city were chosen based on traffic density, this data was obtained from Traffic Engineering and Planning Agency (TEPA), Lahore Pakistan. The given data in Table 1 for each road was calculated into average of the different types of the vehicles for two peak hour periods, each consisting of a 4 h period (7:00–11:00 am & 4:30–8:30 pm) of the day. Selected roads for sampling (Study Sites S) of the plants were Scheme Morr to Dubai Chowk (Allama Iqbal Town Road, S1), Dubai Chowk to Bhekhewal Morr (Allama Iqbal town Road, S2), Bhekhewal Morr to Karim Market Round about (Fazal-e- Haq, S3), Karim Market round about to Karim Market Signal (Moullana Hasrat Mohani Road, S4), Karim Market Signal to Bhekhewal Morr (WahdatRoad-1, S5), Karim Market Signal to Elephant Link Road (Whadat Road-2, S6) and Karim Market Signal to Jinnah Hospital (Site-7, S7), Control site plant samples were collected from less contaminated locations, such as neighboring parks. The samples were collected in triplicates from the selected roadside plants.
Table 1. Variable traffic density on some selected road sites of Lahore city (Punjab), Pakistan.
| Time period (s) | Selected sites with density of vehicles* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *S1 | *S2 | *S3 | *S4 | *S5 | *S6 | *S7 | |
| 7:00–11:00 am | 13,483 | 18,266 | 12,342 | 14,556 | 20,823 | 11,209 | 13,575 |
| 4:30–8:30 pm | 11,488 | 16,703 | 13,517 | 13,998 | 15,546 | 11,785 | 14,708 |
Notes.
Vehicles* include Motorcycles & Scooters, Rickshaw, Qingqi Rickshaw, Car, Wagon, Mini & Large Buses and Trucks.
*S1 to *S7 includes Scheme Morr to Dubai Chowk (Allama Iqbal Town Road, S1), Dubai Chowk to Bhekhewal Morr (Allama Iqbal town Road, S2), Bhekhewal Morr to Karim Market Round about (Fazal-e- Haq, S3), Karim Market round about to Karim Market Signal (Moullana Hasrat Mohani Road, S4), Karim Market Signal to Bhekhewal Morr (WahdatRoad-1, S5), Karim Market Signal to Elephant Link Road (Whadat Road-2, S6) and Karim Market Signal to Jinnah Hospital (Site-7, S7).
Floristic composition
A survey of seven selected roadways was done to determine the plant species on study sites. The available literature was then used to identify the plant species (Nasir & Ali, 1970-89; Ali & Nasir, 1990; Ali & Qaiser, 1992). Subsequently, plants were selected depending on the percentage and uniformity throughout the route and sampling was carried out from February to June, 2022, when the plants were at their peak of growth (Zheng, Ge & Hao, 2013; Liu & Zhang, 2020).
Selection of plant species
Plant species were selected on the basis of dominance of the species (i.e., the no. of plant species) and their common occurrence at each road side (Muller-Dombois & Ellenberg, 1974). The dominantly occurring plant species were: Alstonia scholaris L., Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd., Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus benjamina L., Ficus virens Aiton., Ficus religiosa Linn., Morus alba L., Murraya paniculata L., Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., Polyalthia longifolia Sonn. and Rubia tinctorum L. as shown in Table 2 with their habit and taxonomic classification.
Table 2. Taxonomic illustration of selected plants in urban ecosystem of Lahore (Pakistan).
| Sr.no | Scientific name | Family | Common name | Habit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Alstonia scholaris L. | Apocynaceae | Blackboard or devil tree | Perennial, Evergreen Large Trees |
| 2. | Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. | Nyctaginaceae | Paperflower | Woody climber, perennial shrub |
| 3. | Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. | Fabaceae | North Indian rosewood or shisham | Deciduous tree |
| 4. | Eucalyptus globulus Labill. | Myrtaceae | Tasmanian bluegum | Annual or seomtimes perennial Evergreen tree |
| 5. | Ficus virens Aiton. | Moraceae | White fig | Medium sized tree, perennial evergreen tree |
| 6. | Ficus benjamina L. | Moraceae | Weeping fig | Perennial evergreen shrub or tree |
| 7. | Ficus religiosa L. | Moraceae | Peepal | Perennial and deciduous tree |
| 8. | Morus alba L. | Moraceae | White mulberry | Deciduous tree or shrub |
| 9. | Murraya paniculata L. | Rutaceae | Orange Jasmine, Mock Lime, China Box | Perennial shrub or small tree |
| 10. | Putranjiva roxburghii Wall. | Putranjivaceae | Childlife tree, Lucky Bean Tree | Moderate sized, evergreen tree |
| 11. | Polyalthia longifolia Sonn. | Annonaceae | False Ashoka | Evergreen tree |
| 12. | Rubia tinctorum L. | Rubiaceae | Rose madder or common madder | Evergreen herbaceous Perennial |
Design of experiment
The sampling from the selected seven sites were carried out from the dominant 12 plant species of these road sites by following the completely randomized design. Three trees of each selected plant species were targeted at a variable distance (about 15–20 m) and the leaf samples were collected in triplicate (nine leaf samples of each species). Before collection of the leaf samples, the physiological parameters were assessed through Infrared Gas Analyzer (IRGA) and for growth attributes of plant, dust content and biochemical attributes the leaf samples were packed in polythene bags and transported to the laboratory for further above mentioned analysis.
Dust content (g)
By using weighing balance, filter paper was weighed. Dust from leaves was removed with help of camel hairbrush and reweighed filter paper. Amount of dust was calculated by subtracting both values (filter paper without dust and filter paper with dust) (Hussain, Ilahi & Rashid, 1989).
Growth attributes of plants
Growth attributes of the selected plants under automobile exhaust pollution were assessed with respect to leaf length (mm), leaf width (mm) and leaf area index (mm2) by using leaf area meter (Hussain, Ilahi & Rashid, 1989).
Physiological assessments
The Infrared Gas Analyzer (IRGA, LCA-4) was used to assess physiological features such as photosynthetic rate (µmol m−2s−1), transpiration rate (mol m−2s−1) and stomatal conductance (mol m−2s−1) (Muhammad et al., 2014).
Biochemical assessments
In order to determine carotenoids content, chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll, the biochemical parameters assessed were as follows:
Total chlorophyll content (mg/g)
Chlorophyll content was determined by using the method of acetone extraction (Singh et al., 1991). Two grams of fresh leaves were taken and crushed in 20 ml of 80% acetone by using pestle and mortar. Through filtration, extract of plant leaves was obtained. The absorbance of the filtrate was determined with the help of spectrophotometer at the wavelengths of 663 nm and 645 nm. The whole process was repeated for each plant sample.
To determine the total chlorophyll content following equation was used:
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
where, A663 = Absorbance at 663 nm, A645 = Absorbance at 645
V= Total volume of extract, W= Fresh weight of leaves (g).
Carotenoid content (mg/g)
One g leaves were grinded by using 100% acetone. Through filtration extract of plants were obtained and raise the final volume of extraction solution up to 50 ml. The carotenoid content was determined by spectrophotometer at the wavelength of 440.5 nm (Zofia, Kmiecik & Korus, 2006).
To measure the carotenoid content following equation was used:
| (4) |
where, ‘V’ = volume
‘383’ = carotenoids extinction coefficient
‘As’ = sample absorbance
‘Ab’ = cuvette error
‘W’ = weight of sample (g)
Statistical analysis
The samples of the plants collected from each road side were tested against growth and physiochemical attributes and their statistical significance of the findings were calculated by comparing the means of the attributes through Analysis of the Variance (ANOVA) after Steel, Torrle & Dicky (1997) and their possible response against the particulate dust accumulation through principal component analysis (PCA) after (Mackiewicz & Ratajezak, 1993). While the association among various variables used in this study was developed through multiple correlation technique i.e., heat map by following (Tiranakwit et al., 2023).
Results
Total numbers of 85 plants species were recorded in floristic composition by roadside surveys. For this research work, 12 dominant and common plants species found on all the selected road sites were chosen. On the seven selected study sites, the common plants of urban landscape were: A. scholaris L., B. spectabilis Willd., D. sissoo Roxb., E. globulus Labill, F. virens Aiton., F. benjamina L., F. religiosa L., M. alba L., M. paniculata L., P. roxburghii Wall., P. longifolia Sonn., R. tinctorum L. These plants were under culminating pressure of bad ambient air quality of the Lahore city.
A. scholaris, F. religiosa, and M. alba (0.02 ± 0.005, 0.02 ± 0.003, and 0.02 ± 0.003) showed the highest dust deposition (g), respectively because of their increased canopy cover, which enhances dust trapping capability. This observation is consistent with large leaf area indexes (LAI) mm2, particularly in A. scholaris (1,693 ± 63, control site) and P. longifolia (1,071.2 ± 139.6, polluted site). M. alba had the highest photosynthetic rate (63.01 ± 9.23 at polluted site) µmol m−2s−1, indicating that increased leaf area promotes photosynthetic activity. This shows a positive relationship between canopy cover, leaf area, and photosynthetic efficiency in polluted environments. In comparison, species with minimal canopy coverage, such as F. benjamina and M. paniculata (0.011 ± 0.0008 and 0.011 ± 0.0003) showed the lowest dust deposition respectively, in the polluted site. These species, particularly M. paniculata (88.86 ± 19.7, polluted site), have reduced LAI. This shows a direct link between LAI and the plant’s ability to trap dust (Table 3). F. religiosa had the maximum stomatal conductance (0.62 ± 0.08 versus 0.58 ± 0.08 in polluted and control sites) mol m−2s−1, indicating its ability to maintain gas exchange even under adverse conditions. This character, combined with its high dust deposition, indicates that F. religiosa is well-suited to polluted habitats. D. sissoo (0.03 ± 0.003, polluted site) and A. scholaris (0.07 ± 0.03, control site) had the lowest stomatal conductance, indicating decreased gas exchange and lower stress tolerance. Transpiration rates (mol m−2s−1) showed F. benjamina had the highest values (0.86 ± 0.30 in polluted and 0.85 ± 0.51 in control sites), which may indicate its increased upward water movement through xylem. However, P. longifolia had the lowest transpiration rate (0.10 ± 0.04, polluted site), suggesting limited water loss, an adaptation to conserve water under stress. A. scholaris and E. globulus had the lowest photosynthetic rates (25.36 ± 13.10 and 27.64 ± 14.52, respectively), indicating low tolerance to pollution despite high LAI (Table 4).
Table 3. Amount of dust (g) captured and leaf area index (mm2) of the selected tree species at 0.05 significance level (p = 0.05).
| Sr. no. | Plant species | Amount of dust (g) | Leaf area index (mm 2 ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pol. s | Cont. s | Pol. S | Cont. s | ||
| 1. | A. scholaris | 0.02b ± 0.005 | 0.004a ± 0.0005 | 543.13d ± 306.6 | 1,693d ± 63 |
| 2. | B. spectabilis | 0.015ab ± 0.003 | 0.004a ± 0.0003 | 312.9a ± 11.59 | 532.33ab ± 4.70 |
| 3. | D. sissoo | 0.014ab ± 0.002 | 0.003a ± 0.0006 | 271.04a ± 66.50 | 414.7ac ± 43.006 |
| 4. | E. globulus | 0.014ab ± 0.004 | 0.007a ± 0.001 | 294.73a ± 8213 | 436.6ac ± 22.48 |
| 5. | F. benjamina | 0.011a ± 0.0008 | 0.003a ± 0.0003 | 257.84ab ± 12.10 | 341.8c ± 3.190 |
| 6. | F. religiosa | 0.02b ± 0.003 | 0.004a ± 0.0005 | 201.93ab ± 450.4 | 312.53c ± 31.73 |
| 7. | F. virens | 0.016ab ± 0.003 | 0.004a ± 0.000 | 958.82c ± 380.92 | 1,670d ± 23.00 |
| 8. | M. alba | 0.02b ± 0.003 | 0.006a ± 0.0005 | 997.8c ± 25.175 | 1,172.86e ± 58.69 |
| 9. | M. paniculata | 0.011a ± 0.0003 | 0.004a ± 0.0003 | 88.86b ± 19.7 | 97.96f ± 4.88 |
| 10. | P. roxburghii | 0.012ab ± 0.0003 | 0.004a ± 0.0003 | 496.66d ± 50.33 | 611.66b ± 35.86 |
| 11. | P. longifolia | 0.016ab ± 0.004 | 0.005a ± 0.000 | 1,071.2c ± 139.6 | 1,182.5e ± 113.5 |
| 12. | R. tinctorum | 0.013ab ± 0.006 | 0.007a ± 0.0013 | 306.55a ± 16.93 | 351.11c ± 13.55 |
Notes.
Polluted site, (Pol. s).
Control site (Cont. s).
Different lowercase letters showed significant variation among mean values of aforementioned parameters at 0.05 significance level.
Table 4. Physiological evaluation of plant species (polluted and control sites) at 0.05 significance level.
| Sr. no. | Plant species |
Stomatal conductance (mol m−2s−1) |
Transpiration rate (mol m−2s−1) |
Photosynthetic rate (μ mol m−2s−1) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Pol. s | **Cont. s | Pol. s | Cont. s | Pol. s | Cont. s | ||
| 1. | A. scholaris | 0.04a ± 0.02 | 0.07a ± 0.03 | 0.17ab ± 0.09 | 0.25ad ± 0.14 | 25.36a ± 13.10 | 34.07ab ± 17.68 |
| 2. | B. spectabilis | 0.05a ± 0.01 | 0.15a ± 0.006 | 0.18ab ± 0.04 | 0.48abc ± 0.13 | 34.37ab ± 19.92 | 35.88ab ± 8.12 |
| 3. | D. sissoo | 0.03a ± 0.003 | 0.08a ± 0.03 | 0.21abc ± 0.04 | 0.32abd ± 0.01 | 28.23a ± 11.25 | 51.58ab ± 20.53 |
| 4. | E. globulus | 0.09abc ± 0.02 | 0.08a ± 0.05 | 0.26abc ± 0.08 | 0.22ad ± 0.11 | 27.88a ± 9.83 | 27.64a ± 14.52 |
| 5. | F. benjamina | 0.17bd ± 0.04 | 0.16a ± 0.09 | 0.86d ± 0.30 | 0.85e ± 0.51 | 56.60bc ± 13.34 | 53.73ab ± 26.89 |
| 6. | F. religiosa | 0.62e ± 0.08 | 0.58b ± 0.08 | 0.67de ± 0.11 | 0.59bce ± 0.25 | 60.22bc ± 15.72 | 50ab ± 25 |
| 7. | F. virens | 0.19d ± 0.03 | 0.17a ± 0.08 | 0.42cfg ± 0.11 | 0.41abc ± 0.21 | 44.41abc ± 12.22 | 44.26ab ± 21.83 |
| 8. | M. alba | 0.15bcd ± 0.01 | 0.14a ± 0.008 | 0.54efg ± 0.01 | 0.48abc ± 0.012 | 63.01c ± 9.23 | 59.73b ± 1.01 |
| 9. | M. paniculata | 0.04a ± 0.005 | 0.13a ± 0.01 | 0.24abc ± 0.09 | 0.62ce ± 0.04 | 26.80a ± 7.75 | 45.14ab ± 2.89 |
| 10. | P. roxburghii | 0.17bd ± 0.005 | 0.15a ± 0.01 | 0.34bcf ± 0.03 | 0.32abd ± 0.01 | 56.90bc ± 12.19 | 57.91b ± 6.13 |
| 11. | P. longifolia | 0.08ac ± 0.01 | 0.09a ± 0.04 | 0.10a ± 0.04 | 0.13d ± 0.06 | 42.27abc ± 22.87 | 43.89ab ± 24.00 |
| 12 | R. tinctorum | 0.08ac ± 0.05 | 0.17a ± 0.09 | 0.59eg ± 0.24 | 1.61f ± 0.22 | 30.60ab ± 4.07 | 40.12ab ± 0.22 |
Notes.
Polluted site, (Pol. s).
Control site (Cont. s).
Different lowercase letters showed significant variation among mean values of aforementioned parameters at 0.05 significance level.
Control sites showed higher Chl. a, Chl. b, Total Chl. and Carotenoids contents compared to polluted sites for most species except E. globules and M. alba which indicates pollution has affected photosynthetic efficacy of studied plants. In polluted site, Chl. a content was found to be higher in M. alba (0.76 ± 0.09) compared to the other selected plant species. While in control site, M. paniculata (0.73 ± 0.03) had highest Chl. a concentration among other selected plants. E. globulus (0.24 ± 0.09 at polluted site, 0.23 ± 0.12 at control site) showed lowest Chl. a concentration among other plant species. P. roxburghii (for Chl. b = 1.20 ± 0.12 at polluted site, 1.35 ± 0.10 at control site, for Total Chl. = 2.55 ± 0.43 at polluted site, 2.33 ± 0.07 at control site) had higher levels of Chl. b and Total Chl. (mg/g) in polluted as well as in control site as compared to other plant species. This shows that this species has better photosynthetic capacity, resulted the faster growth and output. High total chlorophyll values indicate its resilience to environmental conditions. Lowest values of Chl. b in polluted and control site both were observed in E. globules (0.32 ± 0.10 at polluted site, 0.30 ± 0.15 at control site). Carotenoids content (mg/g) was found to be higher in E. globulus (9.12 ± 0.71 for polluted site) and lower in M. paniculata (4.12 ± 2.18 at polluted site, 4.45 ± 1.84 at control site) compared to other plant species. Higher carotenoid level in this species may indicate better protection against oxidative stress, which is critical in environments with intense light or other environmental stressors. The diversity in biochemical composition observed in the radar chart reflects species-specific adaptations to environmental conditions (Fig. 1). While at control site, D. sisso (11.18 ± 3.31) had the highest value of carotenoids content (Table 5). These relationships indicate that species with higher canopy coverage, effective stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates, such as F. religiosa and M. alba, are more adaptable and function better in polluted environment. In contrast, species with lower LAI, such as M. paniculata and D. sissoo, are less able to survive pollution stress.
Figure 1. Radar map visualization for comparing carotenoid and chlorophyll level in different plant species.

A. sch, Alstonia scholaris; B. spe, Bougainvillea spectabilis; D. sis, Dalbergia sissoo; E. glo, Eucalyptus globulus; F. ben, Ficus benjamina; F. rel, Ficus religiosa; F. vir, Ficus virens; M. alb, Morus alba; M. pan, Murraya paniculata; P. rox, Putranjiva roxburghii; P. lon, Polyalthia longifolia; R. tin, Rubia tinctorum.
Table 5. Biochemical assessment of species from polluted and control sites at 0.05 significance level.
| Sr. No. | Plant species | Chl. a | Chl. b |
Total chlorophyll
(mg/g) |
Carotenoids
(mg/g) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pol. s | Cont. s | Pol. s | Cont. s | Pol. s | Cont. s | Pol. s | Cont. s | ||
| 1. | A. scholaris | 0.30ab ± 0.15 | 0.38aef ± 0.19 | 0.34de ± 0.17 | 0.55bef ± 0.27 | 0.44cd ± 0.22 | 1.20cd ± 0.62 | 5.94abf ± 0.07 | 6.88g ± 2.97 |
| 2. | B. spectabilis | 0.43ab ± 0.14 | 0.52abcde ± 0.16 | 0.72ab ± 0.28 | 1.14a ± 0.31 | 1.29a ± 0.59 | 2.21a ± 0.73 | 6.04ab ± 0.88 | 9.07a ± 2.23 |
| 3. | D. sissoo | 0.56ac ± 0.08 | 0.64abcd ± 0.01 | 0.70abc ± 0.10 | 0.75bcd ± 0.10 | 0.56bc ± 0.13 | 0.82bcd ± 0.01 | 7.15cd ± 3.03 | 11.18b ± 3.31 |
| 4. | E. globulus | 0.24b ± 0.09 | 0.23f ± 0.12 | 0.32d ± 0.10 | 0.30e ± 0.15 | 0.71bcd ± 0.16 | 0.65bcd ± 0.29 | 9.12e ± 0.71 | 6.20c ± 2.36 |
| 5. | F. benjamina | 0.36ab ± 0.14 | 0.44abdef ± 0.22 | 0.58abcde ± 0.24 | 0.64bcd ± 0.32 | 0.80b ± 0.25 | 0.75b ± 0.38 | 5.25af ± 1.64 | 5.22d ± 2.77 |
| 6. | F. religiosa | 0.32ab ± 0.16 | 0.40aef ± 0.20 | 0.40cde ± 0.21 | 0.55bef ± 0.27 | 0.81b ± 0.30 | 0.65b ± 0.42 | 5.00fg ± 2.01 | 5.82e ± 2.91 |
| 7. | F. virens | 0.26b ± 0.14 | 0.30ef ± 0.19 | 0.44acde ± 0.22 | 0.38ef ± 0.16 | 0.64bcd ± 0.22 | 0.61bcd ± 0.31 | 7.76c ± 2.91 | 7.17fg ± 3.88 |
| 8. | M. alba | 0.76c ± 0.09 | 0.67bcd ± 0.03 | 0.88b ± 0.13 | 0.83cd ± 0.04 | 1.80e ± 0.27 | 1.36e ± 0.07 | 7.91c ± 1.61 | 7.18fg ± 1.07 |
| 9. | M. paniculata | 0.51abc ± 0.01 | 0.73c ± 0.03 | 0.65abce ± 0.11 | 0.87c ± 0.07 | 0.75bc ± 0.12 | 1.14bc ± 0.11 | 4.12g ± 2.18 | 4.45h ± 1.84 |
| 10. | P. roxburghii | 0.56ac ± 0.10 | 0.71bc ± 0.06 | 1.20f ± 0.12 | 1.35a ± 0.10 | 2.55f ± 0.43 | 2.33f ± 0.07 | 7.60c ± 2.02 | 7.48f ± 0.83 |
| 11. | P. longifolia | 0.33ab ± 0.18 | 0.41adef ± 0.21 | 0.55acde ± 0.27 | 0.59bdf ± 0.27 | 0.41d ± 0.22 | 0.44d ± 0.25 | 6.29bd ± 1.86 | 7.43f ± 3.72 |
| 12 | R. tinctorum | 0.41ab ± 0.03 | 0.51abcde ± 0.008 | 0.53acde ± 0.09 | 0.63bcdf ± 0.06 | 0.67bcd ± 0.15 | 0.98bcd ± 0.16 | 7.84c ± 0.39 | 9.69i ± 0.21 |
Notes.
Polluted site, (Pol. s).
Control site (Cont. s).
Different lowercase letters showed significant variation among mean values of aforementioned parameters at 0.05 significance level.
One-way ANOVA was performed at 0.05 significance level (p = 0.05) to analyze variations in the means of physicochemical parameters from plant species at both polluted and control sites. Significant variations among the means of the variables were noted as shown with their statistics in Table 6.
Table 6. One-way ANOVA for various physicochemical parameters between species at control and polluted sites.
| Parameter | Site | SS | df | MS | Fcrit (0.05) | S/NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount of dust | Polluted | 0.0003333 | 11 | 3.030e−05 | 4.17 | S |
| Control | 5.556e−05 | 11 | 5.051e−06 | 0.978 | NS | |
| Leaf area index | Polluted | 3,800,493 | 11 | 345,499 | 92.68 | S |
| Control | 9,954,227 | 11 | 904,930 | 314.1 | S | |
| Photosynthetic rate | Polluted | 6,498 | 11 | 590.7 | 6.987 | S |
| Control | 3,197 | 11 | 290.60 | 3.167 | S | |
| Stomatal conductance | Polluted | 0.8502 | 11 | 0.07729 | 87.77 | S |
| Control | 0.6041 | 11 | 0.05492 | 37.52 | S | |
| Transpiration rate | Polluted | 1.8371 | 11 | 0.16701 | 27.62 | S |
| Control | 5.152 | 11 | 0.4684 | 52.99 | S | |
| Chlorophyll a | Polluted | 0.7679 | 11 | 0.06981 | 6.946 | S |
| Control | 0.9060 | 11 | 0.08236 | 9.371 | S | |
| Chlorophyll b | Polluted | 2.0427 | 11 | 0.18570 | 16.85 | S |
| Control | 2.9480 | 11 | 0.26800 | 32.78 | S | |
| Total chlorophyll | Polluted | 13.276 | 11 | 1.2069 | 104.9 | S |
| Control | 12.156 | 11 | 1.1051 | 101 | S | |
| Carotenoids | Polluted | 70.65 | 11 | 6.422 | 61.78 | S |
| Control | 119.96 | 11 | 10.906 | 742.3 | S |
Notes.
- SS
- Sum of square
- df
- Degree of freedom
- MS
- Mean square
- S
- Significant
- NS
- Non-significant
Significant correlations (Fig. 2) were found between the variables under investigation in the correlation analysis: transpiration rate showed weak negative correlation with dust deposition amount (r = −0.04, p > 0.05), indicating a potential mitigating effect of dust on water loss through transpiration; photosynthetic rate showed significant positive correlation with leaf area index (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), emphasizing the importance of foliage density in carbon assimilation processes; and stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate showed moderate positive correlations (r = 0.41, p < 0.05) and photosynthetic rate (r = 0.37, p < 0.05), indicating coordinated physiological responses to environmental conditions (Table 7). Indicating their crucial role in photosynthesis and general tree health, the chlorophyll content (Chl. a, Chl. b, and total chlorophyll) also demonstrated strong associations with photosynthetic rate and other physiological indicators.
Figure 2. Correlation coefficients heat map of studied physicochemical parameters.

Table 7. Correlations of amount of dust, growth, physicochemical attributes of selected plants.
| Variables |
Transpiration
rate |
Photosynthetic
rate |
Stomatal
conductance |
Amount of dust | Leaf area index | Chl. a | Chl. b |
Total
Chl. |
Carotenoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transpiration rate | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.64 | −0.53 | 0.81 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.68 |
| Photosynthetic rate | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.83 | −0.61 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.94 |
| Stomatal conductance | 0.64 | 0.83 | 1.00 | −0.48 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.87 |
| Amount of dust | −0.53 | −0.61 | −0.48 | 1.00 | −0.69 | −0.57 | −0.63 | −0.58 | −0.52 |
| Leaf area index | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.77 | −0.69 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| Chl. a | 0.45 | 0.76 | 0.68 | −0.57 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| Chl. b | 0.62 | 0.85 | 0.75 | −0.63 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.77 |
| Total Chl. | 0.57 | 0.89 | 0.82 | −0.58 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| Carotenoids | 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.87 | −0.52 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
Moreover, relationship of selected plant species with respect to amount of dust (DA), leaf area index (LAI) and physicochemical attributes like photosynthetic rate (PR), stomatal conductance (SC), transpiration rate (TR), Chl a, Chl b, Total Chl, and carotenoid content (Carot) were drawn by PCA biplot, which indicated that PC1 and PC2 has highest variance that is 32.1 and 25.1% with eigenvalues 3.15 and 2.47 respectively. In 1st quadrant, relationship between DA and LAI can be observed in relation to total chl and photosynthetic rate of plants which clearly demonstrated the experimental findings that DA reduces total chl and photosynthetic rate of plants. In 2nd quadrant, similar trend was observed for SC and TR. Similarly, positive relationship between plant species and biochemical parameters were observed, highlighting their dominant role in plant traits (Fig. 3). PC3 (17.03%) with 1.67 eigenvalue emphasizes qualities linked to leaf structure and density, with contributions from LAI and dust amount. PC4 (11.28%) with eigenvalue 1.11 represents an interaction between LAI and amount of dust (DA), with extra influence from transpiration rate. The next components capture finer variations. PC5 (7.42%) with eigenvalue 0.73 emphasizes the importance of transpiration rates and carotenoids, while PC6 (4.72%) with eigenvalue 0.46 is associated with stomatal conductance and has an inverse association with total chlorophyll. The remaining PCs (PC7-PC9) with eigenvalues 0.15, 0.07 and 0.01 respectively, which account for the least amount of variance, reveal intricate patterns associated with certain physiological and pigment-related features.
Figure 3. PCA biplot of plant species, amount of dust (g), growth and physicochemical attributes at various roadsides of Lahore City.

Discussion
Plantation of trees is one of the key elements in the planning of a sustainable city; choosing the right species and allotting enough room for them to grow is crucial to the design of ecologically sound cities (Ong, 2003). The percentage of green space in an urban area especially the presence of trees determines its ecological performance (Whitford, Ennos & Handley, 2001), because the majority of solutions for improving the quality of the air in large metropolitan centers involve reducing emissions from main sources. The primary originators of air pollution in metropolis are soil dust, cement manufacturing, vehicle exhaust and combustion of fuel, each with varying contributions (Arditsoglou & Samara, 2005). Urban vegetation has the potential to influence pollutant deposition and dispersion, making it a valuable tool for improving air quality (Janhall, 2015). This is a safe sustainable approach, which can save the environment via energy conservation and cheaper pollutant reduction, has no negative environmental effects (Tundele, 2015). One trait that is thought to indicate a plant capacity for stress tolerance is the length of its leaves (Seyyednejad, Niknejad & Yusefi, 2009). In our experiment maximum reduction (1,149.87 mm2) in leaf area was found in Alstonia scholaris at polluted site. In woody plants, the long-term effects of various pollutants, such as SO2 and heavy metals, result in a decrease in leaf size and the growth of aerial plants (Kozlov, Zvereva & Niemela, 1999).
The average amount of dust deposited on all plant species across a site was higher in the polluted zone than in the control zone. The unit of measurement for dust accumulating ability was mg of dust deposited per mm2 of leaf area. Different tree species have notably differing amounts of dust deposited on their leaves. The dust capturing capacity of plant species in the present experiment fall in the range of 0.02–0.003 mg mm−2. Although, in the present study dust load was highest on leaves of Alstonia scholaris, Ficus religiosa and Morus alba at all polluted sites. While Ficus benjamina and Murraya paniculata revealed the least amount of dust accumulation across all polluted sites. This is due to leaf area, the canopy structure, and morphological characteristics of leaves.
According to Tallis et al. (2011) the uptake of particles by vegetation can be affected by several key features including particle size distribution, number of particles in airstream, wind speed and canopy area and structure (i.e., tree species). Furthermore, hairy structure on the surface of leaf, area of leaf and petiole length are considered as an important factor for deposition of dust on the surface of leaf. In current work the tree species like Alstonia scholaris, Ficus religiosa and Morus alba had high dust load. Examination of twelve tree species in capturing pollutant particles were examined in terms of leaf attributes like surface area of leaf, shape of leaf, size of petiole (Beckett, Freer-Smith & Taylor, 2000). Several researchers showed that lower surface area of leaf and length of petiole generates limited exposure of pollution particles. In this research, we also discovered that dust deposition is higher in plants that have larger leaf area, alternate arrangement, compound phyllotaxy, short petiole and rough surface. Dust load on the leaf of trees causes reduction in photosynthesis, lessen stomatal densities and stomatal pore width, resulting into drought sensitivity, because of thin cuticles (Pourkhabbaz, Rastin & Olbrich, 2010). In current experiment, we found that reduction in photosynthetic rate at polluted site induced decrement of carbon consumption and reduction in chlorophyll and carotenoids also seen in several species. Oxidative stress in plants cells is caused by reactive oxygen species due to air pollution (Singh & Rathore, 2018). Wind speed is also the reason for dust deposition on leaves. Dust particles from surrounding soil settled on the leaves of plants nearby roads because of wind (Buccolieri et al., 2018).
Over the next 20 years urban plantation can remove air pollution if appropriate forest management is planned (Parsa et al., 2019). The chlorophyll of sample plants was inversely correlated with the amount of dust present on the leaf. The amount of chlorophyll drops as the dust load rises. In every experimental tree, it was prominent. Polyalthia longifolia and Alstonia scholaris showed maximum reduction in chlorophyll concentration as a result of the dust load. As chlorophyll is essential to plant metabolism and any decrease in chlorophyll content immediately impacts plant growth, measuring chlorophyll content is a useful method for assessing air pollution impacts on plants (Verma & Chandra, 2015). In this way, leaf chlorophyll and carotenoids may deliver substantial details on the physiological state of plants. Plant productivity drops as soon as chlorophyll levels drop, and as a result, the plants lose stability. Thus, plants that maintain their chlorophyll despite being in an atmosphere that is polluted are considered tolerant (Singh & Verma, 2007). Decrease in the amount of carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b in the specimens from polluted locations containing vehicle exhaust noticed by Kapoor (2014). In present research the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus, Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii was higher at polluted sites and lower in control site.
In the current work surprisingly the E. globulus, Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii leaves collected from busy road areas showed a noteworthy increase in total chlorophyll content as compared to control. It suggested that the E. globulus, Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii was more metabolically active and tolerant to polluted air. Species with higher levels of chlorophyll are more tolerant to environment with contaminants and are favorable to plant in that area (Roy, Battacharya & Kumari, 2020). The amounts of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids in E. globulus Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii leaves increased in polluted region. The primary components of energy synthesis in green plants are chlorophyll and carotenoids and environmental influences on plant metabolism greatly alter their concentrations (Shweta & Agrawal, 2006). Despite being an essential component of the plant’s antioxidant defense mechanism, carotenes are highly vulnerable to oxidative damage. The highest reduction of carotenoids content was found in Murraya paniculata at all roads sites. While surprisingly the carotenoids content of Eucalyptus globulus was highest at polluted site which explains its adaptability in air pollution. Along with the chlorophyll and carotenoids, the change in shape and direction of thylakoids is also noticed in photoreactive stress (Sagar & Briggs, 1990). Low stomatal conductance in leaves of Dalbergia sissoo, Alstonia scholaris and Murraya paniculata was recorded at polluted site which reduced the photosynthetic rate.
In heavily polluted places plants limit transpiration to preserve the equilibrium of their physiological processes. The transpiration rate was low in Alstonia scholaris, Bougainvillea spectabilis while Polyalthia longifolia had lowest rate of transpiration in both control and polluted sites as compared to other species. Pollutants impact the mechanism of plant transpiration and lower the relative water content of plants (Gholami, Mojiri & Amini, 2016; Abhijit et al., 2017). Plant samples from contaminated areas had lower levels of chlorophyll due to vehicle exhausts (Kamble et al., 2021). Reduced photosynthetic rates result from various automotive pollution negatively affecting chlorophyll concentrations of plants. When photooxidative damage occurs inside chloroplasts, carotenoids shield the machinery from it. The carotenoid content reduced by a variety of contaminants, which leads to pigment degradation and the breakdown of the chloroplast cellular structure (Sharma & Tripathi, 2009).
The pollution stress commonly altered the photosynthetic rate of Alstonia scholaris, Bougainvillea glabra, Dalbergia sissoo, Murraya paniculata, Polyalthia longifolia and Rubia tinctorum. In harsh environmental situations photosynthesis is the fundamental element in analyzing the metabolism of plants and survival. Accumulation of air pollutants in leaves causes amendments in physiological and biochemical attributes of plants. The absorption of light radiation is blocked by the particulate matter accumulated on the surface of leaves cause reduction in photosynthesis. Restriction in photosynthetic activity is also due to closing of stomata and reduction in leaf area. The gaseous pollutants like SO2, NOX and O3 causes closure of stomata and break CO2 availability for photosynthesis (Dhir, 2016). Reduction in the rate of stomatal conductance and transpiration in some species at the polluted site was recorded in this study. The reason for the reduction in both features was particulate matter which blocked the stomatal pores that resulted in increase of sub-stomatal CO2 (Flowers et al., 2007).
Conclusions
Air quality of Lahore is at worst in terms of particulate matter generated by high traffic volume. Such drastic change in the environment causes a serious threat to plants. Roadside plants assimilate maximum pollution as compared to the trees located away from avenue. The present study highlights the detrimental impacts of gaseous pollutants on the physiochemical and biochemical parameters of some selected species planted at roadsides of Lahore city. The selected plant species were categorized as pollution tolerant and sensitive by analyzing the results of these parameters. E. globulus followed by Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii was more metabolically active and tolerant to air pollutants because the chlorophyll concentration of these plants was higher at polluted sites and lower in control site. There must be proper management of greenbelt to control and maintain the air quality index and these species are highly recommended for controlling air born pollution in urban climate. Air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced by using public transportation networks and walking as well as bicycling for mobility (Farrow, Miller & Myllyvirta, 2020).
Supplemental Information
Replicated values of all the parameters studied.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to department for providing necessary facilities in execution of lab and field work.
Funding Statement
The authors received no funding for this work.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Bushra Munam conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Sohaib Muhammad conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Muhammad Tayyab conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Hafiza Komal Hanif conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Mahrukh Majeed conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Hassan Nawaz performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Muhammad Jawad Tariq Khan performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Summiya Faisal performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Muhammad Hasnain analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Sarah Maryam Malik analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Muhammad Bilal analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Muhammad Zahid analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available in the Supplemental File.
References
- Abhijit et al. (2017).Abhijit KV, Kumar P, Gallagher J, Mcnabola A, Baldauf R, Pilla F, Broderick B, Di-sabatino S, Pulvirenti B. Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments—a review. Atmospheric Environment. 2017;162:71–86. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali & Nasir (1990).Ali SI, Nasir YJ. Flora of Pakistan. Nos. 191-193. Department of Botany, University of Karachi and National Herbarium, PARC; Islamabad: 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Ali & Qaiser (1992).Ali SI, Qaiser M. Flora of Pakistan. Nos. 194-208. Department of Botany, University of Karachi and National Herbarium, PARC; Islamabad: 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Arditsoglou & Samara (2005).Arditsoglou A, Samara C. Levels of total suspended particulate matter and major trace elements in Kosovo: a source identification and apportionment study. Chemosphere. 2005;59:669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beckett, Freer-Smith & Taylor (2000).Beckett KP, Freer-Smith PH, Taylor G. Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and wind speed. Global Change Biology. 2000;6:995–1003. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00376.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bharti, Trivedi & Kumar (2018).Bharti SK, Trivedi A, Kumar N. Air pollution index of plants growing near an industrial site. Urban Climate. 2018;24:820–829. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Buccolieri et al. (2018).Buccolieri R, Jeanjean APR, Gatto E, Leigh RJ. The impact of trees on street ventilation, NOx and PM2.5concentrations across heights in Marylebone Rd street canyon, central London. Sustainable Cities and Societies. 2018;41:227–241. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dhir (2016).Dhir B. Plant responses to air pollution. Springer; Singapore: 2016. Air pollutants and photosynthetic efficiency of plants; pp. 71–84. [Google Scholar]
- Farrow, Miller & Myllyvirta (2020).Farrow A, Miller KA, Myllyvirta L. Toxic air: the price of fossil fuels. Greenpeace Southeast Asia; Netherlands: 2020. pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
- Flowers et al. (2007).Flowers MD, Fiscus EL, Burkey KO, Booker FL, Dubois JJB. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in sensitivity to ozone. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;61:190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ghafari et al. (2021).Ghafari S, Kaviani B, Sedaghathoor S, Allahyari MS. Assessment of Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) for some ornamental woody species in green space of humid temperate region (Rasht, Iran) Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021;23:1579–1600. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01098-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gholami, Mojiri & Amini (2016).Gholami A, Mojiri A, Amini H. Investigation of the air pollution tolerance index (APTI) using some plants species in Ahvaz region. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2016;26:475–480. [Google Scholar]
- Ghorbanian et al. (2020).Ghorbanian A, Shahsavani A, Jafari AJ, Abdolahnejad A, Kermani M, Fanaei F. Quantification of mortality and morbidity in general population of heavily-industrialized city of Abadan: effect of long-term exposure. Journal of Air Pollution and Health. 2020;5:171–180. doi: 10.18502/japh.v5i3.5390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He et al. (2020).He C, Qiu K, Alahmad A, Pott R. Particulate matter capturing capacity of roadside evergreen vegetation during the winter season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020;48:1–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hussain, Ilahi & Rashid (1989).Hussain FS, Ilahi I, Rashid A. Effect of cement dust on the chlorophyll contents, stomatal clogging and biomass of some selected plants. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 1989;32:542–545. [Google Scholar]
- Ilyas & Nissar (2022).Ilyas H, Nissar H. Sectoral emission inventory of Lahore. The Urban Unit, Govt. of the Punjab Lahore; 2022. pp. 20–22. [Google Scholar]
- Janhall (2015).Janhall S. Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution—deposition and dispersion. Atmospheric Environment. 2015;105:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kamble et al. (2021).Kamble P, Bodhane PS, Beig G, Awale M, Mukkannawar U, Mane AV, Mujumdarm M, Kuchekar SR, Patil VN. Impact of transport sector emissions on biochemical characteristics of plants and mitigation strategy in Pune, India. Environmental Challenges. 2021;4:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kapoor (2014).Kapoor CS. Ficus Benghalensis L. tree as an efficient option for controlling air pollution. Research in Health and Nutrition. 2014;2:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Kaur et al. (2022).Kaur J, Bhat SA, Singh N, Bhatti SS, Kaur V, Katnoria JK. Assessment of the heavy metal contamination of roadside soils alongside Buddha Nullah, Ludhiana, (Punjab) India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19:1–24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalid et al. (2019).Khalid N, Masood A, Noman A, Aqeel M, Qasim M. Study of the responses of two biomonitor plant species (Datura alba & Ricinus communis) to roadside air pollution. Chemosphere. 2019;235:832–841. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalil et al. (2022).Khalil M, Iqbal M, Turan V, Tauqeer HM, Farhad M, Ahmed A, Yasin S. Environmental Micropollutants. Elsevier; Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2022. Household chemicals and their impact; pp. 201–232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlov, Zvereva & Niemela (1999).Kozlov MV, Zvereva EL, Niemela P. Effects of soil quality and air pollution on the rooting and survival of Salix borealis cuttings. Boreal Environment Research. 1999;4:67–76. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar et al. (2022).Kumar A, Singh H, Kumari G, Bisht S, Malik A, Kumar N, Singh M, Raturi A, Barthwal S, Thakur A, Kaushal R. Adaptive resilience of roadside trees to vehicular emissions via leaf enzymatic, physiological, and anatomical trait modulations. Environmental Pollution. 2022;313:120191. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu & Zhang (2020).Liu L, Zhang X. Effects of temperature variability and extremes on spring phenology across the contiguous United States from 1982 to 2016. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:17952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74804-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackiewicz & Ratajezak (1993).Mackiewicz A, Ratajezak W. Principal components analysis (PCA) Computers & Geosciences. 1993;19(3):303–342. doi: 10.1016/0098-3004(93)90090-R. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mahrukh Awan et al. (2023).Mahrukh Awan MUF, Luqman M, Sardar AA, Nawaz H, Rasool A, Faisal S, Younas H, Malik SM, Waheed M, Muhammad S. Air pollution mitigation potential of dominant landscape plants of an urban ecosystem (Lahore city) of Pakistan: an Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) assessment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2023;32:3233–3245. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/161980. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad et al. (2014).Muhammad S, Khan Z, Zaheer A, Siddiqi MF, Masood MF, Sargana AM. Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Br. planted bioindicator along different roadsides of Lahore city. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2014;46:869–873. [Google Scholar]
- Mukherjee et al. (2019).Mukherjee S, Chakraborty A, Mondal S, Saha S, Haque A, Paul S. Assessment of common plant parameters as biomarkers of air pollution. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 2019;191:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7540-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller-Dombois & Ellenberg (1974).Muller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons; Canada: 1974. p. 55. [Google Scholar]
- Munsif et al. (2021).Munsif R, Zubair M, Aziz A, Zafar MN. Environmental emissions. Richard viskup; Austria: 2021. Industrial air emission pollution: potential sources and sustainable mitigation. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nasir & Ali (1970-89).Nasir E, Ali SI. Flora of Pakistan Nos 1-190 National Herbarium. PARC, Islamabad and Department of Botany, University of Karachi, Pakistan, Shamin Press Karachi; 1970-89. [Google Scholar]
- Nazarpour et al. (2019).Nazarpour A, Watts MJ, Madhani A, Elahi S. Source, spatial distribution and pollution assessment of Pb, Zn, Cu, and Pb, isotopes in urban soils of Ahvaz city, a semi-air metropolis in southwest Iran. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41787-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nowak et al. (2018).Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Doyle M, McGovern M, Pasher J. Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2018;29:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ong (2003).Ong BL. Green plot ratio: an ecological measure for architecture and urban Planning. LandScape and Urban Planning. 2003;63:197–211. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00191-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- PAQI (2018).PAQI Lahore Smog, Just how Bad Is it? Pakistan Air Quality Initiative, Pervaiz S, Akram MAN, Khan FZ, Javid K, Zahid Y. 2021. Brick sector and air quality: an integrated assessment towards 2020 challenge of environment development. Environment and Natural Resource Journal. 2018;19:153–164. [Google Scholar]
- Parsa et al. (2019).Parsa VA, Salehi E, Yavari AR, Bodegom PMV. Analyzing temporal changes in urban forest structure and the effect on air quality improvement. Sustainable Cities and Societies. 2019;48:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pourkhabbaz, Rastin & Olbrich (2010).Pourkhabbaz A, Rastin N, Olbrich A. Influence of environmental pollution on leaf properties of urban plane trees, Platanus orientalis L. Bulletin Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2010;85:251–255. doi: 10.1007/s00128-010-0047-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy, Battacharya & Kumari (2020).Roy A, Battacharya T, Kumari M. Air pollution tolerance, metal accumulation and dust capturing capacity of common tropical trees in commercial and industrial sites. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;722:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sagar & Briggs (1990).Sagar AD, Briggs WR. Effects of high light stress on carotenoid-deficient chloroplasts in Pisum sativum. Plant Physiology. 1990;94:1663–1670. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.4.1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu, Basti & Sahu (2020).Sahu C, Basti S, Sahu SK. Air pollution tolerance index (APTI) and expected performance index (EPI) of trees in sambalpur town of India. SN Applied Science. 2020;2:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-3120-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sarhan, Elhafeez & Bashanday (2021).Sarhan MGR, Elhafeez AA, Bashanday S. Evaluation of heavy metal concentration as affected by vehicular emission in alluvial soil at middle Egypt conditions. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2021;61:337–354. doi: 10.21608/ejss.2021.89288.1460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sass et al. (2017).Sass V, Wirtz NK, Karceski SM, Hajat A, Crowder K, Takeuchi D. The effects of air pollution on individual psychological distress. Health & Place. 2017;48:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekhar & Sekhar (2019).Sekhar P, Sekhar P. Evaluation of selected plant species as bio-indicators of particulate automobile pollution using Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) approach. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology. 2019;7:57–67. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2019.7011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seyyednejad, Niknejad & Yusefi (2009).Seyyednejad SM, Niknejad M, Yusefi M. Study of air pollution effects on some physiology and morphology factors of Albizia lebbeck in high temperature condition in Khuzestan. Journal of Plant Sciences. 2009;4:122–126. doi: 10.3923/jps.2009.122.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma & Tripathi (2009).Sharma AP, Tripathi BD. Biochemical responses in tree foliage exposed to coal-fired power plant emission in seasonally dry tropical environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2009;158:197–212. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0573-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shweta & Agrawal (2006).Shweta M, Agrawal SB. Interactive effects between supplemental ultraviolet-B radiation and heavy metals on the growth and biochemical characteristics of Spinacia oleracea L. Brazil. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2006;18:98–102. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202006000200007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh et al. (1991).Singh SK, Rao DN, Agrawal M, Pandey J, Naryan D. Air pollution index of plants. Journal of Environmental Management. 1991;32:45–55. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80080-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh & Rathore (2018).Singh R, Rathore D. Oxidative stress defence responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chilli (Capsicum annum L.) cultivars grown under textile effluent fertilization. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;123:342–358. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh & Verma (2007).Singh S, Verma A. Phytoremediation of air pollutants: a review. In: Singh SN, Tripathi RD, editors. Environmental bioremediation technology. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg: 2007. pp. 293–314. [Google Scholar]
- Singh et al. (2020).Singh H, Yadav M, Kumar N, Kumar A, Kumar M. Assessing adaptation and mitigation potential of roadside trees under the influence of vehicular emissions: a case study of Grevillea robusta and Mangifera indica planted in an urban city of India. PLOS ONE. 2020;15:1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skrynetska et al. (2018).Skrynetska I, Ciepal R, Kandziora-Ciupa M, Barczyk G, Nadgorska-Socha A. Ecophysiological responses to environmental pollution of selected plant species in an industrial urban area. International Journal of Environmental Research. 2018;12:255–267. doi: 10.1007/s41742-018-0088-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Staff Reporter (2024).Staff Reporter Lahore again becomes the world’s most polluted city with 394 AQI. 2024. DAWN 22 October, 2024. https://www.dawn.com/news/1866749.
- Steel, Torrle & Dicky (1997).Steel RGD, Torrle JH, Dicky DA. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 3rd Edition McGraw Hill, Inc; New York: 1997. pp. 352–358. [Google Scholar]
- Tallis et al. (2011).Tallis M, Taylor G, Sinnett D, Freer-Smith P. Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011;103:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tiranakwit et al. (2023).Tiranakwit T, Puangpun W, Tamprasit K, Wichai N, Siriamornpun T, Weerapreeyakul N. Phytochemical screening on phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activities of six indigenous plants used in traditional Thai medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:13425. doi: 10.3390/ijms241713425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tundele (2015).Tundele S. Eco-friendly technology-key for sustainable development. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH. 2015;3:1–3. doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i9SE.2015.3171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Uka, Belford & Hogarh (2019).Uka UN, Belford EJ, Hogarh JN. Roadside air pollution in a tropical city: physiological and biochemical response from trees. Bulletin of the National Research Center. 2019;43:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0117-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vardhan, Kumar & Panda (2019).Vardhan KH, Kumar PS, Panda RC. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: current trends and future perspectives. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019;290:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Verma & Chandra (2015).Verma V, Chandra N. Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in Sida ordifolia L. and Catharanthus roseus L. to auto pollution. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2015;2014:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/263092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei et al. (2021).Wei Z, Le QV, Peng W, Ynag Y, Yang H, Gu H, Lam SS, Sonne C. A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil. Journal of Hazardous Material. 2021;403:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitford, Ennos & Handley (2001).Whitford V, Ennos AR, Handley JF. City form and natural process indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001;57:91–103. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Ge & Hao (2013).Zheng J, Ge Q, Hao Z. Impacts of climate warming on plants phenophases in China for the last 40 years. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2013;47(2002):1826–1831. doi: 10.1007/BF03183851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zofia, Kmiecik & Korus (2006).Zofia L, Kmiecik W, Korus A. Content of vitamin C. carotenoids, chlorophylls and polyphenols in green parts of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) depending on plant height. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2006;19:134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2005.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Replicated values of all the parameters studied.
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available in the Supplemental File.
