Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2025 Nov 4;25:1703. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15155-z

Prevalence and clinical significance of the rare HOXB13 X285K variant in a French Caribbean prostate cancer cohort

Johan Rose-Dite-Modestine 1,#, Alexis Vallard 2,#, Jean-Samuel Loger 3, Sylvie Merle 4, Laurianne Noly 2, Ainara Martin-Martinez 2, Mickaelle Rose 4,5, Mylène Annonay 6, Norelyakin Kara 1, Désire Nimubona 1, Nathalie Leclerc 4, Catherine Ledoux 4, Sarah Malsa 7, Xavier Promeyrat 1, Georges Comlan 1, Mélanie Percot 1, Odile Béra 7, Eléna Lihiouel 2, Céline Minchaca 1, Emeline Colomba 6, Régine Marlin 3,✉
PMCID: PMC12584530  PMID: 41188766

Abstract

Background

The HOXB13 gene has been associated with hereditary prostate cancer (PCa), with rare germline variants linked to early-onset and aggressive forms of the disease. While the G84E variant has been well-characterized in Caucasian populations, the clinical relevance of the X285K variant—primarily found in individuals of African ancestry—remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HOXB13 X285K in a French Caribbean cohort and explore its association with adverse clinical features.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study including 465 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Germline sequencing of HOXB13 was performed using Sanger methodology to identify the presence of the X285K variant.

Results

The HOXB13 X285K variant was identified in 5 patients (1.07%). All carriers had clinically significant disease. Among them, three presented with de novo metastatic prostate cancer, and two with intermediate-risk localized disease experienced early biochemical recurrence (at 22 and 34 months). In contrast, recurrence-free survival exceeded 85% at 50 months in the overall cohort.

Conclusions

Although limited by small sample size, these findings suggest a possible link between the HOXB13 X285K variant and early tumor progression. This highlights the importance of screening for this rare variant, particularly in patients of African descent who are underrepresented in genomic studies, to support improved risk stratification and personalized management.

Keywords: Aggressive prostate cancer, HOXB13 X285K, African descent, Health disparities

Background

Disparities in access to cancer care remain a significant issue. Cancer epidemiology in the French overseas territories (FOT) differs significantly from mainland France [1]. Indigenous populations are underrepresented in clinical trials, and little is known about their profiles and outcomes. Martinique, which is a Caribbean FOT made up mainly of people of African origin, has the highest incidence of prostate cancer (PCa), with approximatively 540 new cases per 380,000 inhabitants [2]. These data reflect the high incidence of PCa generally described among black North Americans and Caribbean people [3, 4]. Additionally, the highest age-standardized mortality rates are found in the Caribbean, parts of South America, and in the western, southern, and central regions of Africa [3, 4]. These data underline the need for targeted research to better understand the genetic, environmental and socio-economic factors contributing to this elevated risk in African descent.

Several factors have been widely described as risk factors in PCa [5]. Age is a well-established risk factor for PCa. Recent data from the Martinique cancer registry show that more than one-third of cases are diagnosed under 65 years of age [2]. Family history has also been described as a factor that can increase the risk of developing PCa and having an advanced form of the disease, with the risk increasing based on the familial degree and the number of affected individuals [6]. In addition, a genetic predisposition has been reported in PCa which is considered one of the most inheritable forms of cancer. Extensive twin studies have estimated a heritability at 58% [7]. This high rate of heritability indicates that genetic factors play a substantial role in the risk of developing PCa. Genetic susceptibility can be categorized into genetic factors that are rare but have high penetrance, and those that are more common but generally exhibit lower penetrance. Several studies have reported that DNA damage response genes contribute to the development of early-onset and/or aggressive PCa [8, 9]. BRCA2 mutations represent the most frequent event [9] with a prevalence of 5.3% in men with metastatic PCa [9, 10]. Recently, other genes have been described in early and/or aggressive forms of the disease. Among them, HOXB13 which has been described in familial PCa with the detection of the recurrent G84E mutation in four prostate families [11]. This rare mutation most common among men of Western European descent is associated with a significantly increased risk of hereditary PCa particularly among young men [11, 12]. More recently, we reported the HOXB13 X285K, a rare mutation identified in cohorts of African ancestry within genetic databases [13]. Our study consisted of the analysis of 46 early-onset PCa (< 51 years) which resulted in the identification of three HOXB13 c.853delT mutations. This variant is a deletion of thymine that occurs within stop codon, leading to a stop loss mutation that lengthens the protein by 96 amino acids, i.e. 1/3 of the protein. The association between the HOXB13 X285K with PCa was subsequently confirmed among African American men [14–16]. HOXB13 is a key lineage homeobox transcription factor that plays an essential role in prostate differentiation [17, 18]. Several studies have suggested that alterations in HOXB13 may be involved in the development and progression of PCa. HOXB13 appears to be a co-regulator of androgen receptors (AR) involved in homeostasis of the AR-dependent signaling pathway [19–22]. Nevertheless, HOXB13 also appears to be involved in metastatic tumor progression via an AR-independent pathway [23]. Given the limited knowledge about the clinical relevance of rare HOXB13 variants, we conducted a descriptive study to evaluate the prevalence of the X285K mutation in a cohort of PCa cases from the French Caribbean. By identifying and characterizing carriers of this variant, our goal was to gain preliminary insight into its potential association with specific clinical features or disease trajectories. A better understanding of the distribution and behavior of the X285K mutation may help lay the groundwork for future studies and contribute to the development of more personalized approaches to PCa management in underrepresented populations.

Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a prospective cohort study, in which urologists, oncologists, and oncogeneticists recruited prevalent cases of PCa without restrictions on age, family history, or disease stage. Between April 2021 and July 2024, patients were enrolled either at diagnosis or during a follow-up visit, according to their clinical trajectory. The study was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Individuals Sud-Méditerranée IV (ID-RCB/EudraCT: 2020-A01336-33). All patients gave their written informed consent before inclusion in the study. They provided familial and clinical information, including family history of prostate, breast, and other cancers, as well as medical history and demographic data. Ancestry was one of the inclusion criteria, thus all subjects were of Martinican descent. To explore variations in clinical features by age, patients were categorized into three groups: <56 years, 56–65 years, and > 65 years. Detailed clinical information relating to the diagnosis and treatment, including Gleason score, tumor stage, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis, was available from medical records. PSA levels were grouped into three categories: (i) < 10 ng/mL, (ii) 10–20 ng/mL and (iii) > 20 ng/mL according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines [24]. Clinical stage at diagnosis was classified into three groups: (i) localized group (T1-T2a), which includes cancers confined to the prostate, of small size, and limited to one-half or less of one side of the prostate; (ii) localized group (T2b-T2c), which includes cancers confined to the prostate but with more significant involvement, including up to the entire prostate, without invasion of surrounding structures; and (iii) locally advanced group (T3-T4), which includes cancers that have extended beyond the prostate capsule (T3) or invaded adjacent structures such as the bladder or rectum (T4) and regional/metastatic group, which includes cancers that have extended beyond the prostate capsule or invaded adjacent structures, but with no evidence of regional lymph node involvement (N0) or distant metastasis (M0). Patients were classified into NCCN risk group as follows: low-risk, clinical stage T1-T2a, biopsy Gleason score of ≤ 6, and PSA level < 10 ng/mL; intermediate-risk, clinical stage T2b-T2c, biopsy Gleason score 7, or PSA level 10–20 ng/mL; high-risk, clinical stage > T3a, biopsy Gleason score 8–10, or PSA level > 20 ng/mL, according to AUA/ASTRO Guideline [24].

Molecular analysis and statistics analysis

Screening of the HOXB13 gene was performed on peripheral blood DNA. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The coding region of HOXB13 was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers designed with Primer-BLAST (NCBI), and sequenced by Sanger sequencing on the ABI 3500 DNA analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing reactions were carried out with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and analyzed with SeqScape software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient characteristics were summarized as mean ± standard deviation for quantitative variables and as number (percentage) for qualitative variables. Comparisons between groups were conducted using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Missing data were analyzed for each variable. For all analyses, a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.

Results

In total, 465 patients were included in the study. We identified the HOXB13 X285K germline mutation in 5 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 1.07% among the patients analyzed.

Patient’s and tumor’s characteristics

Median age at diagnosis was 65 years old (44–92) (Table 1). 15% were diagnosed before the age of 56, and a family history of prostate or breast cancer was reported in 38.2% of cases. Most patients (over 70%) were classified as unfavorable intermediate- to high-risk at diagnosis (Table 1). The 5-year RFS in this population was 76% for intermediate-risk and 63% for high-risk groups (Fig. 1). As expected, disease recurrence was significantly associated with clinical stage (T2b-T2c and > T3a) in localized cases (p = 0.00016), while PSA level and Gleason grade were not significantly correlated (Table 2). These baseline characteristics provide a general overview of the cohort from which mutation carriers were identified.

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological characteristics

Characteristic Cases N (%)
465 (100%)
PSA at diagnosis (ng/ml)
 < 10 210 (45.16)
 10–20 103 (22.15)
 > 20 135 (29.03)
 Unknown 17 (3.65)
Gleason grade
 ≤ 6 125 (26.88)
 7 218 (46.88)
 8–10 113 (24.30)
 Unknown 9 (1.93)
Clinical stage
 T1-T2a 159 (34.19)
 T2b-T2c 131 (28.17)
 >T3a 157 (33.76)
 Unknown 18 (3.87)
Risk groups
 Low 51 (10.96)
 Intermediate 159 (34.19)
 High 244 (52.47)
 Unclassified 11 (2.36)
Metatstatic de novo
 Yes 85 (18.27)
 No 380 (81.73)
Age at diagnosis
 < 56 years 71 (15.26)
 56–65 years 171 (36.77)
 > 65 years 212 (45.99)
 Unknown 11 (2.36)
Family history of prostate and breast cancers 178 (38.19)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curve for recurrence-free survival according to risk group

Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristics of localized PCa associated with relapse

Characteristics Cases N (%)
380 (100%)
Relapse
120 (31.57)
No relapse or unknown
260 (68.42)
p
PSA at diagnosis (ng/ml)
 < 10 54 (14.21) 144 (37.89) 1.91E-01
 10–20 31 (8.15) 61 (16.05)
 > 20 28 (7.36) 44 (11.57)
 Unknown 7 (1.84) 11 (2.89)
Gleason grade
 ≤ 6 33 (8.68) 92 (24.21) 2.50E-01
 7 58 (15.26) 123 (32.36)
 8–10 26 (6.84) 38 (10)
 Unknown 3 (0.78) 7 (1.84)
Clinical stage
 T1-T2a 32 (8.42) 123 (32.36) 1.60E-04
 T2b-T2c 45 (11.84) 69 (18.15)
 >T3a 40 (10.52) 51 (13.42)
 Unknown 3 (0.78) 17 (4.47)
Risk groups
 Low 8 (2.10) 43 (11.31) 7.00E-04
 Intermediate 42 (11.05) 116 (30.52)
 High 67 (17.63) 90 (23.68)
 Unclassified 3 (0.78) 11 (2.89)

Demographic, genetic characteristics and outcome in HOXB13 mutated population

The pathological and clinical data of patient with the HOXB13 X285K mutation are presented in Table 3; Fig. 2. Two patients were diagnosed at intermediate risk and were treated with radical prostatectomy. Despite initial treatment, they experienced biochemical recurrence at 22 and 34 months post-surgery. Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage PCa (Tumor stage: T3a-T3b, Gleason scores:7–8) presented with de novo metastatic disease: one with lymph node metastases and two with lymph node, pulmonary and bone metastases. The patient with lymph node metastases was treated with long-term radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). After a 3-year follow-up, no recurrence has been observed. One of the patients with distant metastases received a combination of ADT, second-generation hormonal therapy, and corticosteroids. He has achieved clinical, radiological, and biochemical remission after 3 years of follow-up. The third patient, also with distant metastases, was initially treated with ADT and chemotherapy. However, he developed castration-resistant disease after 13 months. Subsequent treatments involving hormonal therapy and chemotherapy have been effective in controlling the progression of metastatic disease since the development of castration resistance (Fig. 2). Among the five patients carrying the HOXB13 X285K variant, one reported a family history of PCa (his father), while no family history of breast or other cancers was observed.

Table 3.

HOXB13 X285K patient’s characteristics

Age at diagnosis PSA Level ng/ml Gleason grade TNM Stage Metastatic site
ID-1 60 12 3 + 3 T2bN0M0 None
ID-2 66 8.6 3 + 3 T2cN0M0 None
ID-3 60 242 4 + 4 T3bN1M1 Lymph node, lung and bone
ID-4 71 7.6 4 + 3 T3aN1M0 Lymph node
ID-5 72 86 4 + 4 T3aN1M1 Lymph node, lung and bone

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Swimmer plot of patients with HOXB13 X285K. X-axis: months after diagnosis. ABI: Abiraterone. ADT: androgen deprivation therapy. br: biochemical recurrence. CBZ: cabazitaxel. CRPC: castration-resistant prostate cancer. DCX: Docetaxel. ENZ: Enzalutamide. Rd: Radiotherapy. S: Surgery

Early progression in mutation carriers compared to matched low-risk PCa patients

To better contextualize the clinical behavior of patients carrying the HOXB13 X285K mutation, we identified a subgroup of 40 patients within the cohort who shared similar clinical characteristics to the two mutation carriers diagnosed with intermediate-risk disease: a Gleason score of < 6, a PSA level less than 20 ng/mL, and an initial surgical treatment. Both carriers experienced biochemical recurrence at 22 and 34 months, respectively, prompting a comparative descriptive analysis within this matched subgroup.

Kaplan–Meier analysis in this clinically homogeneous subgroup showed a RFS rate of 86.5% at 51 months and 69.2% at 109 months (Fig. 3). The median RFS was not reached at the time of analysis. In contrast, the two mutation carriers progressed earlier than the majority of their clinically matched counterparts. Although statistical testing was not performed due to the small number of mutation carriers, this observation suggests a possible association between the HOXB13 X285K mutation and earlier disease progression in this specific low-risk clinical context.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kaplan–Meier curve of progression-free survival in 40 prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 6, PSA < 20 ng/mL, and surgery initial treatment. The two HOXB13 X285K mutation carriers recurred at 22 and 34 months (indicated by dash lines), whereas the majority of the subgroup maintained progression-free survival beyond 50 months

Discussion

This study is, to our knowledge, the first prospective investigation to report the prevalence of the HOXB13 X285K mutation in a cohort of PCa patients of African descent. Although the number of mutation carriers is limited, our findings provide valuable descriptive data that may contribute to a better understanding of the potential clinical relevance of this variant. We identified the mutation in 3.5% (3/85) of patients with de novo metastatic PCa and in 4.8% (2/42) of intermediate-risk cases who relapsed. Interestingly enough, these latter patients were initially diagnosed with Gleason score 6 tumors and PSA levels below 20 ng/mL—parameters usually associated with a more favorable prognosis. The early recurrence in these cases raises the hypothesis that the X285K may be associated with more aggressive disease behavior or with early tumor escape mechanisms. One of the metastatic cases also presented with a T3aN1 tumor and Gleason score 7. These clinical observations suggest that the mutation could be involved in disease progression even in the absence of high-grade tumor features, emphasizing the need to explore biological mechanisms of progression beyond conventional pathological parameters. These findings are in line with emerging data on HOXB13’s functional roles. The recent work by Nguyen et al. demonstrated that an acetylated form of HOXB-13, conferring a gain-of-function to the protein, enhances the expression of VEGFA and Angiopoietin genes involved in angiogenesis [25]. Several studies have already implicated HOXB13 overexpression in angiogenesis [26, 27]. The HOXB13 X285K mutation has been described as an activating mutation, the recent in vitro study demonstrated that the X285K mutation leads to activation of the E2F/MYC pathway [16]. While functional studies are needed to demonstrate the impact of the mutation, clinical data of patients support the hypothesis that HOXB13 X285K could contribute to dissemination of tumor cells.

These findings reinforce the importance of investigating hereditary and environmental contributors to disease progression, particularly in populations of African descent, who face a disproportionate burden of aggressive PCa and elevated mortality rates [3, 4]. In this context, the role of environmental exposures such as chlordecone—a persistent organochlorine pesticide widely used in the French Caribbean—deserves particular attention, especially given its known interaction with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and its potential implication in angiogenesis-related pathways [28].

Beyond its prognostic implications, the HOXB13 X285K variant could also hold predictive value, particularly in the context of angiogenesis-targeted therapies. While agents such as anti-VEGF antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown promise in several malignancies [29], their efficacy in PCa has been inconsistent, possibly due to the disease’s molecular heterogeneity [30]. Identifying molecular factors that drive tumor escape could help refine patient selection for these therapies. Additionally, since HOXB13 interacts with the AR, this variant may also influence response to hormone-based treatments. In our study, the three patients with de novo metastases appeared to respond to AR–targeted therapy (Fig. 2), an observation consistent with the recent report by Kanayama et al., who described favorable responses to such therapies in six HOXB13 X285K carriers with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer [31].

Systematic follow-up of mutation carriers and evaluation of their clinical outcomes will be essential to better define the prognostic and predictive value of HOXB13 X285K. Although our study is descriptive and based on a limited number of cases, it contributes to a growing body of evidence supporting the need to explore rare germline variants in diverse populations and to better characterize the mechanisms underlying tumor progression PCa.

Our study has limitations. We did not identify the HOXB13 X285K mutation in early-onset cases. This could be explained by the fact that only 15% of our patients were diagnosed before the age of 56, potentially limiting our ability to detect this mutation in younger cases. Additionally, we present the genotyping of HOXB13 exclusively, as it is the only gene for which we have complete data. However, it is well established that BRCA2 and other DNA repair genes are involved in certain forms of PCa associated with poor prognosis. Further studies are planned to characterize additional hereditary mechanisms that may be present in our cohort.

Conclusions

Limited information exists regarding prostate cancer in diverse populations. Our observations suggest a potential involvement of the germline HOXB13 X285Kmutation in the unfavorable progression of PCa within our cohort. We observed a prevalence of 3.5% (3/85) in de novo metastatic cases and 4.8% (2/42) in intermediate-risk cases that relapsed, which may indicate clinical relevance, particularly in metastatic disease and early-onset cases. However, due to the small sample size and the descriptive nature of our study, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research with larger cohorts is necessary to validate these observations. Nonetheless, these preliminary findings highlight the importance of considering targeted screening strategies in underrepresented populations. Currently, germline BRCA2 screening is recommended in Caucasian populations, where approximately 5% of cases exhibit this mutation [9]. A similar approach could potentially enhance early risk stratification, prognostic assessment, and personalized therapeutic management in our population. Organizations such as the FDA, EMA, and academic cancer physician groups advocate for increased equity in cancer care access. It is essential that personalized medicine is also accessible to diverse populations. The development of new therapies targeting HOXB13 mutations could offer significant benefits for patients with advanced PCa harboring this mutation.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Research Department of CHUM for their financial support, as well as for their invaluable contributions to the administrative management and quality control of the data. Their commitment and expertise have been essential to the successful completion of this study, and we deeply appreciate their dedication to advancing research.

Abbreviations

ADT

Androgen deprivation therapy

EMA

European Medicines Agency

FDA

Food drug administration

FOT

French overseas territories

NCCN

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

PCa

Prostate cancer

RFS

Recurrence-free survival

Authors’ contributions

J.R.D.M., A.V., and R.M. wrote the main manuscript text. J.S.L. performed data analysis and contributed to manuscript review. E.C. and R.M. supervised the project and validated the analysis. S.M., M.R., and O.B. contributed to methodology and funding acquisition. Figures and tables were prepared by R.M. A.V and E. Colomba. L. Noly, A. Martin-Martinez, M. Annonay, N. Kara, D. Nimubona, X. Promeyrat, G. Comlan, M. Percot, and E. Lihiouel provided resources and reviewed the manuscript. N. Leclerc, C. Ledoux, S. Malsa, and C. Minchaca contributed to data curation. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Research Fund of Martinique Hospital Center.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available via the link https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa-human/browse/HRA013243.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed with the approval Committee for the Protection of Individuals Sud Mediterranee IV’ (ID-RCB:2018-A209154). Clinical samples were collected from patients after written informed consent was obtained. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Johan Rose-Dite-Modestine and Alexis Vallard contributed equally to this work and co-first-authors.

References

  • 1.Tron L, Belot A, Fauvernier M, Remontet L, Bossard N, Launay L, et al. Socioeconomic environment and disparities in cancer survival for 19 solid tumor sites: an analysis of the French network of cancer registries (FRANCIM) data. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1262–74. 10.1002/ijc.31951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Joachim C, Veronique-Baudin J, Ulric-Gervaise S, Pomier A, Pierre-Louis A, Vestris M, et al. Cancer burden in the Caribbean: an overview of the Martinique cancer registry profile. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:239. 10.1186/s12885-019-5434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bergengren O, Pekala KR, Matsoukas K, Fainberg J, Mungovan SF, Bratt O, et al. 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors-a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2023;84:191–206. 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson JR, Woods-Burnham L, Hooker SE, Batai K, Kittles RA. Genetic contributions to prostate cancer disparities in men of West African descent. Front Oncol. 2021;11:770500. 10.3389/fonc.2021.770500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gandaglia G, Leni R, Bray F, Fleshner N, Freedland SJ, Kibel A, et al. Epidemiology and prevention of prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:877–92. 10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clements MB, Vertosick EA, Guerrios-Rivera L, De Hoedt AM, Hernandez J, Liss MA, et al. Defining the impact of family history on detection of high-grade prostate cancer in a large multi-institutional cohort. Eur Urol. 2022;82:163–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mucci LA, Hjelmborg JB, Harris JR, Czene K, Havelick DJ, Scheike T, et al. Familial risk and heritability of cancer among twins in Nordic countries. JAMA. 2016;315:68–76. 10.1001/jama.2015.17703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin X, Helfand BT, Xu J, Re DA, Leongamornlert, Edward J, Saunders S, Wakerell et al. Germline DNA Repair Gene Mutations in Young-onset Prostate Cancer Cases in the UK: Evidence for a More Extensive Genetic Panel. Eur Urol., 2019;76:329 – 37. Eur Urol. 2019;76:e128–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Pritchard CC, Mateo J, Walsh MF, De Sarkar N, Abida W, Beltran H, et al. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:443–53. 10.1056/NEJMoa1603144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Messina C, Cattrini C, Soldato D, Vallome G, Caffo O, Castro E, et al. BRCA mutations in prostate cancer: prognostic and predictive implications. J Oncol. 2020;2020:4986365. 10.1155/2020/4986365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ewing CM, Ray AM, Lange EM, Zuhlke KA, Robbins CM, Tembe WD, et al. Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:141–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1110000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karlsson R, Aly M, Clements M, Zheng L, Adolfsson J, Xu J, et al. A population-based assessment of germline HOXB13 G84E mutation and prostate cancer risk. Eur Urol. 2014;65:169–76. 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marlin R, Créoff M, Merle S, Jean-Marie-Flore M, Rose M, Malsa S, et al. Mutation HOXB13 c.853delT in Martinican prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2020;80:463–70. 10.1002/pros.23960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Na R, Wei J, Sample CJ, Gielzak M, Choi S, Cooney KA, et al. The HOXB13 variant X285K is associated with clinical significance and early age at diagnosis in African American prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2022;126:791–6. 10.1038/s41416-021-01622-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darst BF, Hughley R, Pfennig A, Hazra U, Fan C, Wan P, et al. A rare germline HOXB13 variant contributes to risk of prostate cancer in men of African ancestry. Eur Urol. 2022;81:458–62. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kanayama M, Chen Y, Rabizadeh D, Vera L, Lu C, Nielsen SM, et al. Clinical and functional analyses of an African-ancestry Gain-of-function HOXB13 variant implicated in aggressive prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023. 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.012. :S2588-9311(23)00202-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McMullin RP, Mutton LN, Bieberich CJ. Hoxb13 regulatory elements mediate transgene expression during prostate organogenesis and carcinogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:664–72. 10.1002/dvdy.21870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brechka H, Bhanvadia RR, VanOpstall C, Vander Griend DJ. HOXB13 mutations and binding partners in prostate development and cancer: function, clinical significance, and future directions. Genes Dis. 2017;4:75–87. 10.1016/j.gendis.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Norris JD, Chang C-Y, Wittmann BM, Kunder RS, Cui H, Fan D, et al. The homeodomain protein HOXB13 regulates the cellular response to androgens. Mol Cell. 2009;36:405–16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pomerantz MM, Li F, Takeda DY, Lenci R, Chonkar A, Chabot M, et al. The androgen receptor cistrome is extensively reprogrammed in human prostate tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1346–51. 10.1038/ng.3419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pomerantz MM, Qiu X, Zhu Y, Takeda DY, Pan W, Baca SC, et al. Prostate cancer reactivates developmental epigenomic programs during metastatic progression. Nat Genet. 2020;52:790–9. 10.1038/s41588-020-0664-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim EH, Cao D, Mahajan NP, Andriole GL, Mahajan K. ACK1-AR and AR-HOXB13 signaling axes: epigenetic regulation of lethal prostate cancers. NAR Cancer. 2020;2:zcaa018. 10.1093/narcan/zcaa018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lu X, Fong K-W, Gritsina G, Wang F, Baca SC, Brea LT, et al. HOXB13 suppresses de novo lipogenesis through HDAC3-mediated epigenetic reprogramming in prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2022. 10.1038/s41588-022-01045-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, Chou R, Crispino T, Davis JW, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I: introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022. 10.1097/JU.0000000000002757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nguyen DT, Yang W, Renganathan A, Weimholt C, Angappulige DH, Nguyen T, et al. Acetylated HOXB13 regulated super enhancer genes define therapeutic vulnerabilities of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:4131–45. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu J-Y, Sun Q-K, Wang W, Jia W-D. High-level expression of HOXB13 is closely associated with tumor angiogenesis and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:2925–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhai L-L, Wu Y, Cai C-Y, Tang Z-G. Overexpression of homeobox B-13 correlates with angiogenesis, aberrant expression of EMT markers, aggressive characteristics and poor prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:6919–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alabed Alibrahim E, Andriantsitohaina R, Hardonnière K, Soleti R, Faure S, Simard G. A redox-sensitive signaling pathway mediates pro-angiogenic effect of Chlordecone via Estrogen receptor activation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;97:83–97. 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cereda V, Formica V, Roselli M. Issues and promises of bevacizumab in prostate cancer treatment. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18:707–17. 10.1080/14712598.2018.1479737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rebello RJ, Oing C, Knudsen KE, Loeb S, Johnson DC, Reiter RE, et al. Prostate cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:9. 10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kanayama M, Colomba E, Shao Y, Nielsen SM, Esplin ED, Lu C, et al. Case series exploring hormonal sensitivity in prostate cancer patients harboring the germline African-ancestry HOXB13 X285K variant. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025. 10.1038/s41391-025-00994-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available via the link https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa-human/browse/HRA013243.


Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES