ABSTRACT
Chestnut blight disease caused by Cryphonectria parasitica is a serious branch disease that occurs worldwide, especially in Europe and North America. In recent years, chestnut blight disease has also been severe and even posed a great threat to the healthy development of chestnut orchards in some areas of China. Accurate and rapid detection of C. parasitica during the initial stages of the disease is helpful to take corresponding prevention and control measures in advance. In this study, we selected the CpSge1 (Gti1/Pac2 transcription factor family) of C. parasitica as the detection target and established a rapid and visual detection system of C. parasitica that combined the recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) and CRISPR/Cas12a, called CpSge1-RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a. The system allows for the specific detection of C. parasitica in approximately 60 mins, with visualization of results. The detection sensitivity of this system was found to be 1 pg/µL. We combined the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a with a lateral flow dipstick, which also showed specific, high sensitivity, and fast characters. In conclusion, the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay has great potential to be a method for early diagnosis and on-site detection of C. parasitica, especially for areas where specialized equipment is lacking.
IMPORTANCE
A rapid, highly sensitive, and visualized detection system of Cryphonectria parasitica was established by using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a method based on the C-terminal variable regions of a fungal-specific transcription factor CpSge1. The detection system was performed at a constant temperature condition of 37°C, which provides important support for the diagnosis of chestnut blight diseases in the field.
KEYWORDS: Cryphonectria parasitica, recombinase-aided amplification (RAA), CRISPR/Cas12a, lateral flow dipstick, rapid detection system
INTRODUCTION
Chestnut blight is a devastating branch disease that causes significant damage to chestnut trees (belonging to the genus Castanea) worldwide, resulting in the death of numerous trees (1, 2). The causal agent, Cryphonectria parasitica, is a typical filamentous fungus that infects above-ground tree parts through wounds. Infected areas typically display necrotic lesions and exhibit rapid expansion, leading to the death of the bark and eventual death of individual trees or entire chestnut forests. In the late stages of the disease cycle, the characteristic orange-yellow stromata are formed on the surface of infected regions. These stromata serve to act as an important identified feature, containing a multitude of sexual or asexual spores. In recent years, chestnut forests in China have also been seriously attacked by C. parasitica, which has the potential to pose a threat to the healthy development of chestnut orchards in certain regions. Generally, chestnut trees at different growth stages can be infected by C. parasitica (3, 4). As for the management of chestnut blight, a range of control measures have been employed, including physical, chemical, resistant breeding, and biological control methods, which showed remarkable effects but could only mitigate the harm of chestnut blight. It is well documented that Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1), a double-strand RNA virus, reduces the virulence of C. parasitica. Furthermore, CHV1 can spread to other C. parasitica, widely used as a biocontrol agent for chestnut blight in Europe (5, 6). Nevertheless, the effect of CHV1 in combating chestnut blight remains inadequate in other regions. Therefore, early detection and prevention are needed to reduce the harm of chestnut blight disease.
The Gti1/Pac2 transcription factor is a conserved fungal-specific protein family with a stable and conserved N-terminal domain (7, 8). However, their C-terminal regions are highly variable and not conserved among different fungal species (9). Generally, there are two members in this family, namely, Gti1/Sge1/Wor1/Rpy1/Mit1/Reg1/Fgp1 and Pac2, which show shared and distinct roles in different processes (10–16). Gti1/Sge1/Wor1/Rpy1/Mit1/Reg1/Fgp1, a conserved member of the Gti1/Pac2 protein family, plays important roles in fungal growth, sporulation, protein secretion, toxin synthesis, and pathogenicity, such as Verticillium dahliae Sge1 (VdSge1) and Zymoseptoria tritici Wor1 (white–opaque regulator 1) (ZtWor1) (17, 18). Previous studies have identified CpSge1, a member of the Gti1/Pac2 family, as a transcription factor that regulates the pathogenicity of C. parasitica. It was shown that CpSge1 is the core regulator of fungal growth, stress tolerance, gene expression, and virulence in C. parasitica. Furthermore, the pathogenicity of the CpSge1 deletion mutant was markedly reduced, demonstrating that CpSge1 is a core gene governing the pathogenicity of this phytopathogen (19). Consequently, CpSge1 was prioritized as the diagnostic target gene for C. parasitica detection, given its potential to enable species-specific molecular identification through conserved functional domains associated with fungal virulence regulation. This selection establishes a foundation for developing rapid diagnostic assays.
In recent years, the high sensitivity and good specificity of the CRISPR/Cas system have made it widely used in the detection of various pathogens, especially the CRISPR/Cas12a system (20, 21). Cas12a, also known as Cpf1, can cut non-targeted single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is an RNA-directed monomeric endonuclease protease belonging to the Class 2 (Type V) CRISPR/Cas systems (22, 23). The CRISPR/Cas12a system can detect amplification products containing the correct protospacer adjacent motif (PAM; 5′-TTTN-3′) sequence, thereby reducing false-positive signals and significantly improving the specificity of the assay (24). Cas12a and crRNA were incubated to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. These complexes bind to the target DNA by recognizing the 5′-TTTN-3′ PAM sequence (located 3′ to the protospacer) through crRNA guidance, followed by cleavage of the target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) (25). Upon activation, Cas12a exhibits collateral cleavage activity, non-specifically cleaving nearby single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) probes in the solution (26, 27). The detection results can be rapidly interpreted via fluorescence readout, which is suitable for both laboratory and field detection. When integrated with isothermal amplification methods, including recombinase polymerase amplification, recombinase-aided amplification (RAA), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), the CRISPR/Cas12a system enables highly specific and sensitive nucleic acid detection (28, 29). RAA is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology that operates at a constant temperature (e.g., 37–42°C) and requires minimal equipment, significantly reducing reliance on expensive experimental equipment and consumables (30). The RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system leverages dual-layer specificity: (i) sequence-specific amplification by RAA and (ii) PAM-dependent target recognition and crRNA-guided cleavage by Cas12a (21). The results can be interpreted through fluorescence readout (e.g., using a portable blue light transilluminator for FAM-labeled probes) or lateral flow dipstick (LFD) assays (e.g., via FAM/biotin-labeled reporters), enabling flexible readout options for both laboratory and field detection (31, 32). The detection process diagram is shown in Fig. 1. The RAA reaction exponentially amplifies the target DNA under isothermal conditions, achieving sufficient template concentration for downstream detection. Upon completion of amplification, the CRISPR/Cas12a RNP complex binds to the amplified DNA via crRNA-guided hybridization and PAM recognition, inducing site-specific dsDNA cleavage. This target-activated Cas12a further exhibits collateral cleavage activity, non-specifically degrading fluorophore-quencher-labeled ssDNA probes (e.g., FAM-BHQ1) or dual-labeled reporters (e.g., FAM/biotin-ssDNA), thereby generating a measurable signal (fluorescence or lateral flow readout). By the aforementioned principle, the fluorescence-quenched ssDNA probe was employed as a fluorescent reporter. The Cas12a system uses a fluorescent ssDNA probe (FAM-BHQ1) for detection. Target-activated Cas12a cleaves the probe, turning on fluorescence. For field use, a dual-labeled probe (FAM/biotin) enables lateral flow strips to show color changes (positive: two lines; negative: one line). This combines CRISPR precision with rapid visual readouts (33, 34).
Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay. (A) illustrates the RAA workflow, achieving exponential target DNA amplification under isothermal conditions. (B) illustrates the Cas12a/crRNA cleavage assay workflow and fluorescence-based detection (quantitative) and the LFD assay for dual validation of CRISPR-Cas12a activity. The visual bands on the test strip typically comprise a control line (C line, which serves to validate the detection validity) and a test line (T line, indicating the presence of the target analyte). The C line must exhibit visible coloration to confirm result reliability, while the intensity of the T line coloration correlates with the concentration of the target analyte.
Therefore, this study applied the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for rapid detection of C. parasitica, establishing a theoretical foundation for developing targeted strategies to control its spread and develop its ecological impact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Extraction of strains and genomic DNA
C. parasitica, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Verticillium dahliae, Cytospora chrysosperma, and Pseudocryphonectria elaeocarpicola were used in our detection and specificity assays were performed and maintained in our laboratory. Gymnosporangium yamadai was collected from the infected apple leaves and used for DNA extraction during its biotrophic feature. The genomic DNA (gDNA) of each strain was extracted by the CTAB method and stored at −20°C.
Construction of CpSge1-T-vector
The sequence of CpSge1 was acquired from the reference genome of C. parasitica EP155 in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Then, the gDNA of C. parasitica was used as the template, and the primers CpSge1-F and CpSge1-R were used to amplify CpSge1. The reaction solution includes 2× SanTaq PCR Master Mix (Sangon Biotech [Shanghai] Co., Ltd.), CpSge1-F and CpSge1-R primers, DNA template, and water to a volume of 50 µL. The resulting products were purified using the TIANgel Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech [Beijing] Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), resulting in the full-length fragment of the CpSge1. The purified CpSge1 fragment was ligated to the T-Vector pMD19 (Takara Bio Inc.), and the CpSge1-T-vector was acquired.
Design of primers and crRNA
The sequences were searched using the NCBI database, which included the following organisms: C. parasitica, C. chrysosperma, Fusarium graminearum, Zymoseptoria tritici, Fusarium verticillioides, V. dahliae, Magnaporthe oryzae, and Botrytis cinerea. The sequence alignment was performed using Jalview. Two crRNAs were designed from the C-terminal variant region of C. parasitica. According to the recognition site of crRNA, primers for RAA were designed. Two candidate primers for the RAA assay were designed by following the design principles of RAA primers. The primers, crRNAs, and marked probes were synthesized by Beijing Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd. The RAA amplification reaction was performed by following the instructions of the RAA Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit (Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China). The primers and the probes used are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Sequence of PCR primer, RAA primer, crRNA, and probe
| Name | Sequence | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| CpSge1-F | ATGGACGAGCTTGTGTCGCA | Amplification of the full length of CpSge1 |
| CpSge1-R | AAGGACGCGAAGAACTGATCG | |
| Cp-crRNA1 | UAAUUUCUACUAAGUGUAGAUUUCCUUGGGAGCAGCAGCAG | Guide RNA1 |
| Cp-crRNA2 | UAAUUUCUACUAAGUGUAGAUCCGACAUGAUGCUGUUGGCC | Guide RNA2 |
| CpRAAF | TCCTGGACGACCGAGCCCTACTCCTTGGAATGA | Amplification of CpSge1 RAA fragment 1 |
| CpRAAR | CTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGTTGGTGGTGTTG | |
| CpRAA2F | GAGCGGACATCCTCCCTACCACAGATACCACAGA | Amplification of CpSge1 RAA fragment 2 |
| CpRAA2R | TCTTCTCTTGCTGCTGCTGCTGGTGCTGCT | |
| ssDNA1 | 5′-FAM-TTATT-BHQI-3′ | Probe 1 |
| ssDNA2 | 5′-FAM-TTTTTTTATTTTTTT-biotin-3′ | Probe 2 |
Construction of RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay of C. parasitica
The RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection system contains two parts: the RAA reaction and the CRISPR/Cas12a reaction. First, the gDNA or CpSge1-T-vector of C. parasitica was used as a template for RAA reactions conducted with two primer pairs, respectively, for optimal primer selection using the RAA nucleic acid amplification basic kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. A mixture containing 25 µL of buffer V, 14.5 µL of purified water, 2 µL of primer F (10 µM), and 2 µL of primer R (10 µM) was manually mixed, briefly centrifuged, and added to the basic reaction unit. Following thorough mixing and brief centrifugation, 5 µL of magnesium acetate and 1.5 µL of gDNA were added; the mixture was vortexed and incubated in a preheated 37°C metal bath for 40 min, and the RAA amplification product was obtained. Then, the reaction system consists of 1× NEBuffer 2.1 (New England Biolabs [Beijing] Ltd.), Cas12a protein (50 µM; New England Biolabs [Beijing] Ltd.), crRNA (50 µM), ssDNA1 (50 µM), amplification product, and DEPC water. Then, the system was incubated at 37°C for 1 h in the Light Cycler 96 System, and the final system was exposed to the ultraviolet. Furthermore, the ssDNA1 probe was replaced with ssDNA2 to align with the Cas12/13 special nucleic acid strip (Tiosbio Inc.) with the CRISPR/Cas12a reaction system. The system was incubated at 37°C for 40 min. Subsequently, the reaction product was diluted 10-fold, with 5 µL added to 45 µL of water. The FAM/Bio dual-labeled amplicons served as the detection targets. The reaction products were applied to the lateral flow strip and incubated for 2 min at room temperature, enabling rapid on-site detection of C. parasitica. The test line appears when gold-conjugated anti-FAM antibody binds to FAM label on the ssDNA. Biotin label is captured by streptavidin immobilized on the test line. The presence of both the test line and the control line indicated a positive test result. Conversely, a negative test result was indicated by the presence of only the control line. In the absence of the control line, the test was deemed invalid.
Optimization of CRISPR/Cas12a assay
To optimize the CRISPR/Cas12a reaction system, we conducted the RAA-CRISPR assay using C. parasitica gDNA and the selected optimal RAA primers and probe within a concentration range of Cas12a (1 µM, 0.5 µM, and 0.25 µM) and crRNA (1 µM, 0.75 µM, 0.5 µM, and 0.25 µM), respectively. Finally, the optimum crRNA, concentration of Cas12a, and crRNA were confirmed and selected for further analysis.
Specificity and sensitivity of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for C. parasitica detection
To confirm the specificity of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay developed for detecting C. parasitica, C. gloeosporioides, G. yamadai, P. elaeocarpicola, V. dahliae, and C. chrysosperma were analyzed. The results were then visualized using the RAA-Cas12a-LFD assay.
To determine the sensitivity of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for C. parasitica detection, different concentrations of gDNA (1,000 ng/µL) and CpSge1-T-vector (100 ng/µL) were tested. A 10-fold gradient dilution was performed continuously, extending from 1 × 10−8 to 1 × 100 to obtain the required concentration of gDNA and CpSge1-T-vector. The gDNA and CpSge1-T-vector were employed as templates for the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay. The copy number was also calculated. Subsequently, the results were visualized using the RAA-Cas12a-LFD assay.
Diagnosis of field samples using the developed RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay
To ensure the reliability and applicability of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for C. parasitica detection in the field, we tested healthy and infected C. parasitica into chestnut branches. Nuclease-free water was used as a negative template control (NTC). Five-millimeter mycelial plugs from PDA plates of C. parasitica strains were placed onto the scorched areas and secured with sealing film. Inoculated branches were maintained at room temperature under high humidity for 20 days. Total DNA was extracted from the bark of healthy and infested branches at the spots. Primers CpSge1-F/R were used to amplify a 1,626-bp fragment within the CpSge1 gene for verification. The extracted total gDNA was analyzed using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for visual detection of the results. Three replications of each experiment were made.
RESULTS
Design and optimization of detection primers and crRNA
As mentioned above, the Gti1/Pac2 transcription factor family, which generally consists of two members: Gti1 (also known as Sge1, Wor1, or Ryp1) and Pac2, is specific in fungi. The N-terminal Gti1/Pac2 domains are highly conserved among the Gti1 orthologs from different fungal species, while the C-terminal regions are various, as shown in Fig. S1. Therefore, we selected the C-terminal regions of CpSge1 as the target for detection. Following the guidelines of RAA primer designing, two sets of primer pairs, CpRAAF/R and CpRAA2F/2R, were manually designed from the CpSge1 gene of C. parasitica. To evaluate the specificity of the designed two primer pairs, the RAA amplification was carried out using C. parasitica, C. gloeosporioides, G. yamadai, and V. dahliae as templates. Notably, the RAA products produced by the CpRAAF/R primer pair exhibited the highest intensity and specific band. CpRAAF/R was identified as the optimal choice due to its superior performance in terms of non-specific amplification and amplicon length (Fig. 2). Subsequently, two crRNAs were separately used to detect C. parasitica in the CRISPR/Cas12a assay (Fig. S1). The probe was cleaved when the amplified product was mixed with the different components of the CRISPR/Cas12a assay, and a fluorescent signal was released in the presence of the CpSge1-T-vector and the Cas12a/crRNA complex. As shown in Fig. 3, the obvious fluorescent signal was observed and detected for the CpSge1-T-vector samples, while no fluorescent signal was detected for the negative control. Additionally, the fluorescence intensity of the reaction products by using crRNA1 as the guide was notably stronger than that of crRNA2 (Fig. 3A), and the fluorescence value generated by using the crRNA1 showed a well-linear upward trend, and the peak value of crRNA2 was lower than that of crRNA1 (Fig. 3B). The results suggested that the crRNA1 showed a better effect than the crRNA2 in the CRISPR/Cas12a assay. Thus, crRNA1 was chosen for the subsequent experiment. Figure S2 is the target sequence of crRNA for the detection of C. parasitica.
Fig 2.

The optimal amplification primer pairs screening using RAA. (A) Detection of RAA amplification products. (B) Verification of gDNA from four fungal pathogens. Lane M: 250 bp DNA marker; gDNA from four fungal pathogens—C. parasitica (Cp), C. gloeosporioides (Cg), V. dahliae (Vd), and G. yamadai (Gy)—was amplified by RAA using specific primer pairs CpRAAF/R and CpRAA2F/2R. The size of the amplification product of CpRAAF/R is 326 bp.
Fig 3.
crRNA design optimization for RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a specificity enhancement. (A) Fluorescence imaging of Cas12a-mediated cleavage activity on RAA-amplified C. parasitica gDNA using crRNA1 or crRNA2. (B) Real-time fluorescence kinetics quantifying Cas12a activation efficiency under optimized crRNA conditions.
Optimization of the CRISPR/Cas12a assay
In this study, we tested the optimization of the CRISPR/Cas12a assay. To this end, Cas12a (1, 0.5, and 0.25 µM) and crRNA1 (1, 0.75, 0.5, and 0.25 µM) were tested at different concentrations. Four combinations of Cas12a and crRNA1 displayed high fluorescence values, including 1 µM Cas12a and 0.25 µM crRNA1, 0.25 µM Cas12a and 0.25 µM crRNA1, and 0.25 µM Cas12a and 0.5 µM crRNA1, and 0.25 µM Cas12a and 1 µM crRNA1 (Fig. 4). Excessively high concentrations of Cas12a may increase non-specific cleavage activity, whereas insufficient concentrations can impair its ability to efficiently cleave the target DNA, thereby compromising the overall cleavage efficiency of the system. An excessively high concentration of crRNA1 may lead to non-specific binding interactions, while a suboptimal concentration may inadequately facilitate the targeting of Cas12a to the desired locus, thereby compromising the precision and efficacy of the CRISPR-Cas12a system. In consideration of reagent cost, we selected 0.25-µM Cas12a protein and 0.25-µM crRNA1 for the CRISPR/Cas12a assay in further experiments. Three replications of each experiment were made, and the results were highly consistent across all replicates.
Fig 4.
Optimization of the Cas12a and crRNA concentration. (A) Endpoint fluorescence imaging (UV transillumination, 365 nm) of Cas12a-mediated cleavage across 12 combinatorial conditions (Cas12a: 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µM; crRNA: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 µM). (B) Heatmap with optimal activity at 0.25 µM Cas12a + 0.25 µM crRNA.
Specificity of the CRISPR/Cas12a assay of C. parasitica
For the specificity evaluation of the CRISPR/Cas12a assay, six fungal species were selected: C. parasitica and the other five fungi. Among these, C. parasitica and C. gloeosporioides were known to be associated with chestnut tree disease, while the remaining four species served as negative controls. As shown in Fig. 5, by RAA combined with CRISPR/Cas12a, C. parasitica and other species were clearly distinguished by fluorescence visualization and fluorescence signal values (Fig. 5A). The dipstick results demonstrated that only C. parasitica exhibited both the test line and the control line, indicating that the CRISPR/Cas12a detection system exhibited excellent specificity for C. parasitica (Fig. 5B). The results indicated that both the fluorescence detection and the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD methods of the C. parasitica CRISPR/Cas12a assay exhibited high specificity. Three replications of each experiment were made, and the results were highly consistent across all replicates.
Fig 5.
Specificity evaluation of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system. (A) Real-time fluorescence kinetics comparing Cas12a-mediated cleavage activity across gDNA from six phytopathogens: C. parasitica (Cp), C. gloeosporioides (Cg), P. elaeocarpicola (Ps), G. yamadai (Gy), V. dahliae (Vd), and C. chrysosperma (Cc). (B) Test strips show a distinct T-line signal exclusively for C. parasitica gDNA, confirming the high specificity of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system. C line indicates valid assay procedure.
Sensitivity of CRISPR/Cas12a assay of C. parasitica
To determine the sensitivity of CRISPR/Cas12a of C. parasitica, the gDNA of C. parasitica (1,000 ng/µL), CpSge1-T-vector (100 ng/µL), and their continuously 10-fold gradient diluted samples (100 to 10−8) were used as the template, respectively. The test results showed that when the gDNA was diluted 10−6 (Fig. 6A and B), the fluorescence signal could be detected and two clear bands were observed, which were indicated by the strong color signal at the test line on the LFDs. However, when the DNA concentration was further decreased, the test lines disappeared. Therefore, the limited concentration of gDNA detected by the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay was 1 pg/µL, and the limited detected copy number was 2.1 × 101 copies/μL (Fig. 6). Furthermore, fluorescent signals could be detected when the CpSge1-T-vector was diluted to 10−7. Upon further dilution to 10⁻⁸, two clear bands were observed (Fig. 7A and B). Therefore, the limited concentration of CpSge1-T-vector was 1 fg/μL, and the limited detected copy number was 2.32 × 102 copies/μL by using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD system. The findings indicated that the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection assay was susceptible to C. parasitica. Experiments were independently conducted four times, and the results were reproducible.
Fig 6.

Sensitivity profiling of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system for C. parasitica gDNA detection. (A) Real-time fluorescence kinetics showing the Cas12a-mediated cleavage activity across a dynamic range of C. parasitica gDNA. A significant linear correlation was observed between the fluorescence intensity and the logarithm of C. parasitica gDNA concentration. The fluorescence detection achieved a lower limit of 1 pg/µL, and the copy limit for detection is 2.1 × 101 copies/μL. (B) LFD dipstick assay validation of sensitivity thresholds. Test strips display visible T-line signals down to 1 pg/µL, and the copy limit for detection is 2.1 × 101 copies/μL. The C line indicates valid assay operation. The gDNA concentrations for samples 1–9 follow a 10-fold serial dilution series: 103, 102, 101, 100, 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 ng/μL. The total DNA amounts are 2,000 ng, 200 ng, 20 ng, 2 ng, 200 pg, 20 pg, 2 pg, 0.2 pg, and 0.02 pg, respectively.
Fig 7.

Sensitivity profiling of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system for CpSge1-T-vector detection. (A) Real-time fluorescence kinetics showing Cas12a-mediated cleavage activity across a dynamic range of CpSge1-T-vector. A significant linear correlation was observed between the fluorescence intensity and the logarithm of CpSge1-T-vector concentration. The fluorescence detection achieved a lower limit of 10 fg/μL, the CpSge1-T-vector concentration is 1 × 10−8 µg/µL, and the copy limit for detection is 2.32 × 103 copies/μL. (B) Lateral flow dipstick assay validation of sensitivity thresholds. Test strips display visible T-line signals down to 10−8, the CpSge1-T-vector concentration is 1 fg /μL, and the copy limit for detection is 2.32 × 102 copies/μL. The C -line indicates valid assay operation. The CpSge1-T-vector concentrations for samples 1–9 follow a 10-fold serial dilution series: 102, 101, 100, 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5, and 10−6 ng/μL, sample 10 is no temple control. The total CpSge1-T-vector amounts are 200 ng, 20 ng, 2 ng, 200 pg, 20 pg, 2 pg, 0.2 pg, 0.02 pg, 0.002 pg, and 0, respectively.
Actual sample testing
To evaluate the performance of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay, healthy chestnut branches and chestnut branches infected by C. parasitica were tested using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay established in this study. Healthy one-year-old chestnut branches were selected and sterilized with a flamed steel rod to create a 5-mm-diameter wound. Subsequently, a 5-mm-diameter mycelial plug from a 7-day-old C. parasitica culture was aseptically inoculated onto the wounded site. gDNA was separately extracted from both C. parasitica-inoculated branches and non-inoculated healthy branches. The infected branches exhibited characteristic brown necrotic lesions, contrasting with the asymptomatic phenotype of the non-inoculated healthy controls (Fig. 8A). PCR analysis with primers CpSge1-F/R amplified a 1,626-bp product specific to C. parasitica in the infected sample. Absence of this amplicon in the healthy sample and the negative control confirmed pathogen infection (Fig. 8B). Then, the non-inoculated healthy sample and the inoculated sample were used for RAA amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a reaction. The results showed that fluorescence signals could only be observed or detected in infected chestnut branches (Fig. 8C). Meanwhile, both the test line and the control line were observed (Fig. 8D), indicating that both the fluorescence detection method and the LFD method could detect C. parasitica in practical applications. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate with consistent results.
Fig 8.
Clinical sample detection of C. parasitica using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system. (A) Phenotypical comparisons of inoculated and uninoculated plant branches. (B) Molecular validation of inoculated and uninoculated plant branches. PCR products amplified from uninoculated and inoculated branches with CpSge1-F/R. The size of the CpSge1 is 1,626 bp. (C) Real-time fluorescence kinetics demonstrating Cas12a-mediated cleavage activity in clinical samples. Inoculated chestnut tissues exhibited rapid fluorescence amplification, while uninoculated chestnut tissues showed minimal background signals. (D) LFD assay results. Distinct T-line signals were observed exclusively in inoculated samples, with C lines confirming valid assay operation. The NTC contained nuclease-free water in place of template DNA.
DISCUSSION
C. parasitica seriously affects the ornamental, ecological, and economic value of chestnut, and the occurrence of the disease has not been effectively controlled (35). Once the hosts are infected by C. parasitica, the necrotic lesions quickly surround the branches and trunks, causing canker symptoms, which significantly reduce the yield and quality of chestnuts, and may even lead to the death of the entire tree (36). Identifying and detecting C. parasitica based on field symptoms would easily lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Conventional methods for detecting C. parasitica rely mainly on observing symptoms and identifying the morphology of the pathogen (37). These methods often require specialized equipment, such as sophisticated thermal cyclers and skilled technicians. The conventional molecular biological detection methods are contingent upon expensive instruments and apparatus, and the steps are complex and time-consuming, which presents a challenge in meeting the needs of rapid on-site detection (38, 39). Thus, it is crucial to establish new assays to detect the presence of C. parasitica.
Classical molecular biological detection methods (such as duplex PCR) exhibit significant limitations in detecting C. parasitica. This approach requires two specific primers and achieves target amplification through 30–40 thermal cycles. The complete detection process typically takes 60 min and is susceptible to interference from non-specific amplification, resulting in false positives and background amplification. Compared to traditional PCR, RAA employs a recombinase-single-stranded DNA-binding protein system to achieve nucleic acid amplification under isothermal conditions. This method not only significantly reduces reaction time but also eliminates reliance on precision thermal cyclers, thereby markedly enhancing the feasibility of on-site pathogen detection (40). This enables it to better meet the requirements of rapid and simple on-site pathogen detection (41). Both RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD and LAMP systems achieve detection within approximately 1 h. However, RAA operates under isothermal conditions without requiring precise thermal cycling, significantly simplifying instrumentation compared to LAMP (typically requiring 60–65°C) (42). This feature enables field deployment using portable heating blocks. RAA primers targeting the C. parasitica ensure target-selective amplification. CRISPR/Cas12a’s collateral cleavage activity is activated only upon crRNA hybridization to amplified products, eliminating non-specific signals through orthogonal validation. The CRISPR/Cas12a diagnostic system achieves single-molecule detection sensitivity through crRNA-guided specific recognition and trans-cleavage activity. The lateral flow detection readout method is particularly suited for resource-limited settings, enabling visual interpretation without instrumentation. The CRISPR/Cas12a diagnostic systems have been widely implemented in detecting diverse pathogens (43), which do not rely on complex equipment and show high sensitivity, making them ideally suited for rapid diagnostic scenarios in the field (41, 44).
Our assay demonstrated no cross-reactivity with the aforementioned pathogens. False-positive results may occur due to contamination by other pathogenic fungi in the environment. Despite the availability of several laboratory and commercial assays for the detection of C. parasitica in chestnut, there remains a need for rapid and accurate detection methods that are suitable for field applications. The selection of target genes allowed the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a method to have good specificity. The sensitivity of the real-time PCR method for the detection of C. parasitica in bark tissues was 2 fg of gDNA (45). In this study, the limit of detection of the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay was determined to be 1 pg/µL, which was more sensitive than the conventional end-point PCR method. This indicated that RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a could offer an earlier identification of infection than PCR, thereby providing a potential advantage in disease prevention. Furthermore, the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay successfully detected C. parasitica from chestnut branches. This suggests that it was a viable option for practical, non-laboratory diagnosis in the monitoring of C. parasitica infection.
Furthermore, compared to cumbersome sampling processes and time-consuming laboratory deliveries, on-site diagnostics offer significant advantages in terms of convenience and time efficiency. The reaction does not necessitate thermal cycling and can be conducted with only limited equipment support, such as a portable mini-centrifuge and a set of pipettes. It can be accomplished by employing the RAA reaction combined with the on-site DNA extraction method; based on the UV flashlight irradiation, the fluorescence was distinguishable with 2.1 × 101 copies/μL of the gDNA. Similarly, in the detection combined with LFD, the sensitivity could reach a minimum of 2.1 × 101, and the results could be judged directly through the eyes. These methods facilitate rapid on-site inspection by reducing equipment requirements, inspection time, and cost through visual inspection using a portable UV flashlight and Cas12/13 special nucleic acid strip. Although our method has certain advantages, it is not without limitations. It is worth noting that the RAA amplification process may have inadvertently increased the risk of aerosol contamination and false-positive results due to the necessity of opening the lids of the reaction tubes for product transfer. The objective of our ongoing study is to overcome this limitation, which includes the development of non-opening operations and an increase in the size of samples.
In conclusion, a rapid detection system was developed that enables real-time monitoring in the chestnut growing environment. This method does not require complex, large-scale instrumentation or specialized personnel and is capable of rapidly and accurately identifying C. parasitica in chestnut plants. The developed system showed great potential in rapid field detection of C. parasitica in infected chestnut orchards.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2023YFD1401301).
Dianguang Xiong designed the experiment, and Haoyu Wu and Xiaorong Lin conducted the experiment. Haoyu Wu wrote the draft manuscript. Dianguang Xiong and Chengming Tian reviewed the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Dianguang Xiong, Email: xiongdianguang@126.com.
Kevin Loren Hockett, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01079-25.
Alignment of the CpSge1 sequence.
Schematic of crRNA design targeting CpSge1 for RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a specific detection.
Supplemental figure legends.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Anagnostakis SL. 1987. Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23–37. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1987.12025367 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nie X, Zhao S, Hao Y, Gu S, Zhang Y, Qi B, Xing Y, Qin L. 2023. Transcriptome analysis reveals key genes involved in the resistance to Cryphonectria parasitica during early disease development in Chinese chestnut. BMC Plant Biol 23:79. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04072-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Guérin L, Robin C. 2003. Seasonal effect on infection and development of lesions caused by Cryphonectria parasitica in Castanea sativa. For Pathol 33:223–235. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2003.00329.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rigling D, Prospero S. 2018. Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Mol Plant Pathol 19:7–20. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Heiniger U, Rigling D. 2009. Application of the Cryphonectria hypovirus (Chv-1) to control the chestnut blight, experience From Switzerland. Acta Hortic 815:233–246. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.815.31 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Prospero S, Rigling D. 2016. Using molecular markers to assess the establishment and spread of a mycovirus applied as a biological control agent against chestnut blight. Biocontrol (Dordrecht) 61:313–323. doi: 10.1007/s10526-015-9713-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Paes HC, Derengowski L da S, Peconick LDF, Albuquerque P, Pappas GJ, Nicola AM, Silva FBA, Vallim MA, Alspaugh JA, Felipe MSS, Fernandes L. 2018. A Wor1-like transcription factor is essential for virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:369. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen Y, Zhai S, Zhang H, Zuo R, Wang J, Guo M, Zheng X, Wang P, Zhang Z. 2014. Shared and distinct functions of two Gti1/Pac2 family proteins in growth, morphogenesis and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. Environ Microbiol 16:788–801. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Luo Z, Xiong DG, Tian CM. 2024. The roles of Gti1/Pac2 family proteins in fungal growth, morphogenesis, stress response and pathogenicity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 37:488–497. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-23-0198-CR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liu OW, Chun CD, Chow ED, Chen C, Madhani HD, Noble SM. 2008. Systematic genetic analysis of virulence in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Cell 135:174–188. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Michielse CB, van Wijk R, Reijnen L, Manders EMM, Boas S, Olivain C, Alabouvette C, Rep M. 2009. The nuclear protein Sge1 of Fusarium oxysporum is required for parasitic growth. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000637. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Han Z, Yu R, Xiong D, Tian C. 2021. A Sge1 homolog in Cytospora chrysosperma governs conidiation, virulence and the expression of putative effectors. Gene 778:145474. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mandel MA, Beyhan S, Voorhies M, Shubitz LF, Galgiani JN, Orbach MJ, Sil A. 2022. The WOPR family protein Ryp1 is a key regulator of gene expression, development, and virulence in the thermally dimorphic fungal pathogen Coccidioides posadasii. PLoS Pathog 18:e1009832. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jonkers W, Dong Y, Broz K, Kistler HC. 2012. The Wor1-like protein Fgp1 regulates pathogenicity, toxin synthesis and reproduction in the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002724. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cain CW, Lohse MB, Homann OR, Sil A, Johnson AD. 2012. A conserved transcriptional regulator governs fungal morphology in widely diverged species. Genetics 190:511–521. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Michielse CB, Becker M, Heller J, Moraga J, Collado IG, Tudzynski P. 2011. The Botrytis cinerea Reg1 protein, a putative transcriptional regulator, is required for pathogenicity, conidiogenesis, and the production of secondary metabolites. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1074–1085. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-11-0007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Santhanam P, Thomma B. 2013. Verticillium dahliae Sge1 differentially regulates expression of candidate effector genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26:249–256. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-12-0198-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mirzadi Gohari A, Mehrabi R, Robert O, Ince IA, Boeren S, Schuster M, Steinberg G, de Wit PJGM, Kema GHJ. 2014. Molecular characterization and functional analyses of ZtWor1, a transcriptional regulator of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Mol Plant Pathol 15:394–405. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lin X, Yang Y, Huang C, Xiong D, Qiu X, Tian C. 2025. Transcriptome analysis reveals that a Gti1/Pac2 family gene, CpSge1, regulates fungal growth, stress response, and virulence in Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology 115:521–534. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-24-0354-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen X, Tan Y, Wang S, Wu X, Liu R, Yang X, Wang Y, Tai J, Li S. 2021. A CRISPR-Cas12b–based platform for ultrasensitive, rapid, and highly specific detection of hepatitis B virus genotypes B and C in clinical application. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.743322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang Y, Du P, Shao Y, Wang W, Liu Y, Ma Y, Hu P, Cao J, Wang X, Abd El-Aty AM. 2024. An innovative and efficient fluorescent detection technique for Salmonella in animal-derived foods using the CRISPR/Cas12a-HCR system combined with PCR/RAA. J Agric Food Chem 72:8831–8839. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shmakov S, Smargon A, Scott D, Cox D, Pyzocha N, Yan W, Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Severinov K, Zhang F, Koonin EV. 2017. Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:169–182. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, Koonin EV, Zhang F. 2015. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163:759–771. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wu H, He J-S, Zhang F, Ping J, Wu J. 2020. Contamination-free visual detection of CaMV35S promoter amplicon using CRISPR/Cas12a coupled with a designed reaction vessel: rapid, specific and sensitive. Anal Chim Acta 1096:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.10.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yamano T, Zetsche B, Ishitani R, Zhang F, Nishimasu H, Nureki O. 2017. Structural basis for the canonical and non-canonical PAM recognition by CRISPR-Cpf1. Mol Cell 67:633–645. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chen JS, Ma E, Harrington LB, Da Costa M, Tian X, Palefsky JM, Doudna JA. 2018. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 360:436–439. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yamano T, Nishimasu H, Zetsche B, Hirano H, Slaymaker IM, Li Y, Fedorova I, Nakane T, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Ishitani R, Zhang F, Nureki O. 2016. Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 165:949–962. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhang X, Ge X, Shen F, Qiao J, Zhang Y, Li H. 2022. Diagnostic efficiency of RPA/RAA integrated CRISPR-Cas technique for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 17:e0276728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yang B, Shi Z, Ma Y, Wang L, Cao L, Luo J, Wan Y, Song R, Yan Y, Yuan K, Tian H, Zheng H. 2022. LAMP assay coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a system for portable detection of African swine fever virus. Transbound Emerg Dis 69:e216–e223. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang T, Liu X, Yang X, Liu F, Yang H, Li X, Feng H, Wu X, Jiang G, Shen H, Dong J. 2022. Rapid on-site detection method for white spot syndrome virus using recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow test strip technology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:889775. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.889775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lei R, Li Y, Li L, Wang J, Cui Z, Ju R, Jiang L, Liao X, Wu P, Wang X. 2022. A CRISPR/Cas12a-based portable platform for rapid detection of Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica crops. Front Plant Sci 13:976510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.976510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gui L, Zhao Y, Xu D, Li X, Luo J, Zhou W, Li M. 2022. Quick detection of Carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV) by recombinase-aid amplification lateral flow dipstick (RAA-LFD) method. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:981911. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.981911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Qi Y, Yin Q, Shao Y, Li S, Chen H, Shen W, Rao J, Li J, Li X, Sun Y, Lin Y, Deng Y, Zeng W, Zheng S, Liu S, Li Y. 2018. Rapid and visual detection of Coxiella burnetii using recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow strips. Biomed Res Int 2018:6417354. doi: 10.1155/2018/6417354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Daher RK, Stewart G, Boissinot M, Bergeron MG. 2016. Recombinase polymerase amplification for diagnostic applications. Clin Chem 62:947–958. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.245829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ding P, Liu F, Xu C, Wang K. 2007. Transmission of Cryphonectria hypovirus to protect chestnut trees from chestnut blight disease. Biol Control 40:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Double ML, Jarosz AM, Fulbright DW, Davelos Baines A, MacDonald WL. 2018. Evaluation of two decades of Cryphonectria parasitica hypovirus introduction in an American chestnut stand in Wisconsin. Phytopathology 108:702–710. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0354-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Khakimov A, Salakhutdinov I, Omolikov A, Utaganov S. 2022. Traditional and current-prospective methods of agricultural plant diseases detection: a review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 951:012002. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/951/1/012002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Fan X, Li L, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Liu C, Wang Q, Dong Y, Wang S, Chi T, Song F, Sun C, Wang Y, Ha D, Zhao Y, Bao J, Wu X, Wang Z. 2020. Clinical validation of two recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays (RPA/RAA) for the rapid detection of African swine fever virus. Front Microbiol 11:1696. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Popov AP, Tsvetkov IL, Belov AA, Konichev AS, Ivanushkina NE, Kochkina GA, Ozerskaya SM. 2010. Molecular genetic identification of the phytopathogenic fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Microbiology (Reading) 79:223–228. doi: 10.1134/S0026261710020141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bai J, Lin H, Li H, Zhou Y, Liu J, Zhong G, Wu L, Jiang W, Du H, Yang J, Xie Q, Huang L. 2019. Cas12a-based on-site and rapid nucleic acid detection of African swine fever. Front Microbiol 10:2830. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhu L, Liang Z, Xu Y, Chen Z, Wang J, Zhou L. 2023. Ultrasensitive and rapid visual detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system. Biosensors (Basel) 13:659. doi: 10.3390/bios13060659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wong YP, Othman S, Lau YL, Radu S, Chee HY. 2018. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a versatile technique for detection of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol 124:626–643. doi: 10.1111/jam.13647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kellner MJ, Koob JG, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Zhang F. 2019. SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat Protoc 14:2986–3012. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0210-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xing G, Shang Y, Wang X, Lin H, Chen S, Pu Q, Lin L. 2023. Multiplexed detection of foodborne pathogens using one-pot CRISPR/Cas12a combined with recombinase aided amplification on a finger-actuated microfluidic biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 220:114885. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rubio S, Barnes A, Webb K, Hodgetts J. 2017. A real-time PCR assay for improved rapid, specific detection of Cryphonectria parasitica. Ann Appl Biol 171:52–61. doi: 10.1111/aab.12354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Alignment of the CpSge1 sequence.
Schematic of crRNA design targeting CpSge1 for RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a specific detection.
Supplemental figure legends.




