ABSTRACT
Antimicrobial resistance is a global health problem. Among various antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is a clinically important pathogen responsible for serious infections because of its multidrug resistance (MDR) and association with high mortality rates. The MDR nature of MRSA, including resistance to macrolides, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines, limits therapeutic choices and poses significant challenges in clinical management. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluoroquinolone drugs, such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, in MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). A total of 63 S. aureus clinical strains were isolated from blood samples of sepsis patients. DNA sequence analysis was performed using gDNA extracted from all S. aureus clinical isolates to identify mutations in the QRDR of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE. The MICs of antimicrobials were determined by the broth microdilution method. Among these genes, only mutations in parC showed a statistically significant positive correlation with elevated MIC levels, underscoring the primary role of parC in mediating resistance in our clinical isolates. Notably, all isolates exhibited a substitution at serine 80 (S80) in parC, and those harboring simultaneous substitutions at both S80 and glutamic acid 84 (E84) demonstrated markedly increased MIC values for both drugs. These findings reinforce previously reported associations between dual mutations and high-level fluoroquinolone resistance, while highlighting the distinct contribution of parC among the QRDR genes analyzed in this study. Furthermore, we found that the most frequent mutation in the QRDR was the cytosine-to-thymine mutation.
IMPORTANCE
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health crisis, making bacterial infections harder to treat. Staphylococcus aureus, especially MRSA, is a major concern due to its resistance to multiple antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Our study highlights how specific genetic mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) influence fluoroquinolone resistance. We found that mutations in the parC gene, particularly substitutions at serine 80 (S80) and glutamic acid 84 (E84), significantly increase resistance. Understanding these mutations helps predict antibiotic resistance and may guide more effective treatment strategies. By identifying key genetic changes that drive fluoroquinolone resistance, our research contributes to developing improved diagnostic tools and targeted therapies to combat drug-resistant S. aureus infections. This knowledge is crucial for clinicians and researchers working to control the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and improve patient outcomes.
KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), fluoroquinolone, DNA mutation
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), often referred to as a “silent pandemic,” is one of the global challenges and public health threats humanity faces in the 21st century according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Numerous studies report that by 2050, more deaths from antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections are expected than from cancer (1). In response, global campaigns such as World Antibiotic Awareness Week (WAAW) have been launched to curb the spread of drug-resistant infections. However, antibiotic consumption continues to rise worldwide. For example, the Republic of Korea ranks among the highest in antibiotic use among OECD countries (https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9-en), highlighting the urgency of local and global efforts to address this crisis.
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium commonly found on the skin and in the nasal passages of healthy individuals (2).
Although often harmless in healthy individuals, S. aureus can cause severe infections in immunocompromised or hospitalized patients, including skin abscesses, pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and sepsis, particularly when introduced through wounds or invasive procedures.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition marked by dysregulated inflammatory responses to infection, potentially leading to multi-organ failure or death (3). According to the US CDC, one in three hospital deaths is related to sepsis, with a growing burden worldwide. Given its high mortality and complication rates, early identification and appropriate antimicrobial treatment are essential (4, 5).
Among the various strains of S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to its resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. The World Health Organization classifies MRSA as a high-priority antimicrobial-resistant pathogen, underscoring its role in severe and difficult-to-treat infections globally.
Methicillin is a penicillin-class antibiotic developed to resist degradation by beta-lactamase enzymes, which inactivate earlier beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin by breaking the beta-lactam ring. Like other beta-lactams, methicillin inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis. Like other penicillin antibiotics, methicillin binds to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) to inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis. However, the mecA gene, which encodes PBP2a—a low-affinity PBP that is not affected by beta-lactam antibiotics—could be transferred through the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, resulting in MRSA (6, 7). MRSA infections are commonly seen in healthcare settings (healthcare-acquired MRSA, or HA-MRSA), often due to invasive medical devices such as catheters, but unfortunately, MRSA is now also spreading to the community (community-acquired MRSA, or CA-MRSA) (8, 9).
In the Republic of Korea, MRSA is considered a risk factor for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and is designated and monitored as a legal infectious disease by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). It is especially prevalent in Asia (8, 10, 11). Furthermore, MRSA strains not only exhibit intrinsic resistance to all β-lactam antibiotics but also frequently acquire resistance to other antibiotic classes, including macrolides, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines, rendering treatment options increasingly limited. Therefore, the therapeutic limitations for MDR S. aureus, its resistance to antibiotics, proper management of antibiotic use, and the prevention of infection must be addressed.
One of the antibiotic treatments for MRSA is vancomycin. However, vancomycin currently presents a significant challenge for the healthcare system because its use is limited due to its high cost, difficulty in managing intravenous (IV) administration, numerous serious side effects, and increasing reports of vancomycin-resistant bacteria worldwide (12).
Fluoroquinolones are a class of quinolone antibiotics that have a bactericidal effect by inhibiting the activity of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, enzymes involved in DNA synthesis and replication. These drugs are among the most prescribed antimicrobial agents worldwide (13). Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are the most commonly used fluoroquinolones (14). Ciprofloxacin, a second-generation fluoroquinolone, has been designated by the WHO as an essential drug and is widely prescribed. Levofloxacin, a third-generation fluoroquinolone, was developed with enhanced activity against gram-positive bacteria (13, 15). Recently, it has been reported that MRSA resistant to fluoroquinolones is increasing and is difficult to treat (16). In comparison to ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, MRSA showed the second-highest resistance percentage (90%) after vancomycin-resistant enterococci (17). Furthermore, ciprofloxacin was the third most commonly identified resistant drug in S. aureus isolates analyzed by the KCDC between 2016 and 2022, with a resistance rate of 31.6% (https://nih.go.kr/nohas/en/statistics/selectARStatisticsMainTab.do?systemName=Kor_GLASS). Additionally, studies have suggested that ciprofloxacin should no longer be used as a treatment for MRSA infections and should only be used in limited cases (12).
The mechanisms by which fluoroquinolone resistance is acquired can be divided into three categories: chromosomal mutations in drug target enzymes, efflux pump overexpression, and plasmid-mediated resistance gene acquisition. Among these, resistance due to chromosomal mutations in target enzymes is the most common mechanism (13). These antibiotic resistance mechanisms arise when mutations occur at the subunit sites of the target enzymes, DNA gyrase (which regulates DNA supercoiling), and topoisomerase IV (which relaxes supercoiled DNA). The subunit sites, including gyrA and gyrB of DNA gyrase, and parC and parE of topoisomerase IV, are collectively referred to as the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) (18).
Therefore, the present study analyzed DNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in the subunit sites of the QRDR and determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels by conducting a broth microdilution method for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in clinical isolates of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus isolated from patients with sepsis. Based on these results, statistical analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between the degree of mutation in the QRDR and the MIC levels in order to identify the sites associated with resistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical isolates
In the present study, a total of 63 S. aureus clinical isolates from blood culture samples were collected from patients with sepsis admitted to Konyang University Hospital, a general hospital with a capacity of 850 beds located in Daejeon, the Republic of Korea, between August 2015 and June 2018. The samples were provided by the Diagnostic Microbiological Laboratory of the Department of Laboratory Medicine. S. aureus clinical strains were single clones obtained from one or more pairs of positive blood culture bottles containing pediatric or adult samples, without including duplicate strains. For analysis, the strains were divided into the categories of MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) based on the antimicrobial (oxacillin) susceptibility test results.
Blood culture
Blood cultures were performed at the affiliated hospital’s Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory using standard protocols. Isolates identified as S. aureus were collected for further analysis in the present study.
Bacterial identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer
All strains isolated and cultured as single colonies from the blood cultures were subjected to bacterial species identification using a Microflex MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). MALDI Biotyper RTC software version 3.1 (Bruker Daltonics) was used to analyze the bacterial species identification results. For the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) analysis, fresh single colonies cultured for 16–18 h were smeared directly onto an MSP 96 Target Polished Steel BC Microscout Target Plate (Bruker Daltonics) using a sterilized wooden applicator. After the bacteria had dried, 1 µL of reagent solution containing α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid saturated with a matrix solution (50% acetonitrile, 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid) was added. After the reagent solution had dried completely at room temperature, the plate was mounted on the Microflex MALDI Biotyper equipment for analysis. The operational definitions were as follows: if the cut-off score set by the equipment manufacturer was 2.0 or greater, species identification was considered valid; if the cut-off score was 1.7 or greater but less than 2.0, bacterial genus identification was possible; and if the cutoff score was less than 1.7, the result was judged as unreliable.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
Single colonies obtained after primary culture of the blood samples were adjusted to McFarland 0.5 using the BBL PROMPT Inoculation System (Beckman Coulter, West Sacramento, CA, USA), applied to the Positive MIC 28 Panel with a Renok Inoculator, and then tested using the MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus System (Beckman Coulter). The MIC level was classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the CLSI guidelines, CLSI M100 S30. Through this process, ciprofloxacin resistance was confirmed.
Genomic DNA extraction
A total of 63 S. aureus genomic DNA (gDNA) samples were extracted from the single colonies isolated from the blood-derived samples for molecular genetic characterization. Single colonies of the cultured bacteria were collected using a platinum loop. For the washing step, 1,000 µL of distilled water (DW) was added, mixed well, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 2 min. After removing the supernatant, only the remaining cell pellets were stored in a deep freezer for 5 min. The pellets were then incubated at 100°C for 10 min after adding 200 µL of 5% Chelex-100 Resin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Following incubation, the sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 2 min, and only the supernatant was retained. The supernatant served as the template DNA for the PCR. After confirming the purity and concentration using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), the extracted gDNA was stored at –20°C until further analysis.
mecA gene detection using qPCR SYBR Green assay
To detect the mecA gene, the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) SYBR Green assay was performed as follows: 10 µL of THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), 10 pmol of each forward and reverse primer, 3 µL of extracted gDNA as template DNA, and 5 µL of sterile DW were added to prepare a 20 µL reaction mixture. The qPCR SYBR Green assay was conducted using the QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR Instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The nucleotide sequences of the primer pairs were designed based on existing research data (Table 1) (19). The qPCR conditions for detecting the mecA gene were as follows: pre-denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. After the amplification process was completed, a melting curve was derived by increasing the temperature of the amplification product in 0.5°C increments, from 55°C to 95°C. The specificity of the primer pair used was then determined. The qPCR result was considered valid only when the cycle threshold value of the amplification curve derived from the qPCR was less than 30.
TABLE 1.
Oligonucleotide primer pairs used for target gene detection in this study
| Target genes | Primer sequence (5′ to 3′) | Amplicon size (bp) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mecA | Forward GTG AAG ATA TAC CAA GTG ATT | 147 | (19) | |
| Reverse ATG CGC TAT AGA TTG AAA GGA T | ||||
| gyrA | Forward CAG GAC CTT CAA TAT CCT CC | 574 | (10) | |
| Reverse GCG ATG AGT GTT ATC GTT GCT | ||||
| gyrB | Forward CGA TTT TGT GAT ATC TTG CTT TCG | 291 | ||
| Reverse CAG CGT TAG ATG TAG CAA GC | ||||
| parC | Forward GTT GGA AAA TCG GAC CTT | 664 | ||
| Reverse GAT GAG GAG GAA ATC TAG | ||||
| parE | Forward CAT CAG TCA TAA TAA TTA CAC | 405 | ||
| Reverse GAC AAT TGT CTA AAT CAC TTG TG | ||||
QRDR gene detection analysis
In the present study, the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in the QRDR were detected by conventional PCR in S. aureus isolates to identify mutations in the DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV enzymes. The nucleotide sequences of the primer pairs were designed based on existing research data (Table 1) (10). Each primer was diluted to 10 pmol. The PCR mixtures were prepared in a total volume of 20 µL. Each reaction contained 3 µL of template DNA, 1 µL of each primer, 10 µL of Prime Taq Premix (2×) (GeNet Bio, Daejeon, Republic of Korea), and 5 µL of ultra pure water. The PCR amplification conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR was performed using a SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR products were then confirmed by DNA electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gel (Fig. 1).
Fig 1.
Confirmation of amplified gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes using DNA electrophoresis. Amplicon size (bp): gyrA = 574, gyrB = 291, parC = 664, and parE = 405. NC: negative control.
DNA sequence analysis of QRDR with gDNA samples and analysis of mutation
DNA sequence analysis of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE in the QRDR was conducted with gDNA samples obtained from the Macrogen Online Sequencing Order System (Macrogen, Seoul, Republic of Korea). To analyze the DNA mutations, the obtained DNA sequence was compared with S. aureus ATCC 12600 using the Multalin interface (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/) (20). An example of the alignment method used to detect QRDR mutations is shown in Fig. 2. Additionally, amino acid substitution analysis was performed on the protein sequence. The nucleotide sequence was translated into an amino acid sequence using the Translate Tool provided by Expasy (https://web.expasy.org/translate/).
Fig 2.
Analysis of DNA and amino acid mutations compared to S. aureus ATCC 12600 using Multalin. (A) gyrA gene nucleotide sequence, (B) GyrA amino acid sequence, (C) gyrB gene nucleotide sequence, (D) parC gene nucleotide sequence, (E) ParC amino acid sequence, (F) parE gene nucleotide sequence, (G) ParE amino acid sequence.
Determination of MIC levels of fluoroquinolone antibiotics using the broth microdilution method
The MIC levels for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were determined by the broth microdilution method. For preculture, a total of 63 S. aureus isolates were inoculated in Mueller–Hinton broth and incubated at 37°C for 20 h. After incubation, the cultures were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL), followed by dilution to 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL. The concentrations of both antibiotics were prepared ranging from 512.0 to 0.5 µg/mL using a twofold serial dilution. A 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL dilution of bacteria was dispensed into a 96-well plate containing each concentration of antibiotics (100 µL per well) and incubated at 37°C for 20 h (Fig. 3). The absorbance at 595 nm was measured using a microplate reader (iMARK Microplate Reader, Bio-Rad) to assist in determining the MIC level in cases where visual inspection was ambiguous. The MIC was defined as the concentration at which the absorbance was reduced by more than half compared to the previous concentration.
Fig 3.
Detection of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels of fluoroquinolone antibiotics using the broth microdilution method. GC: growth control.
Statistical analysis
The creation of graphs and the correlation analysis between MIC levels and the degree of DNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in the QRDR were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Additionally, a linear regression analysis was performed on the correlation graphs. Comparison of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MIC levels according to mutation site groups was analyzed using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Isolation of S. aureus clinical isolates
A total of 141 S. aureus isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF MS analysis using a single colony isolated from blood cultures. Of these, 63 S. aureus strains were confirmed to be resistant to ciprofloxacin through antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the 141 blood culture samples. These 63 strains were further classified into 60 MRSA and 3 MSSA by the mecA qPCR SYBR Green assay (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Total number of clinical samples used in the present study
| Clinical samples (n = 63) | Parameter | Detail | n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRSA (n = 60) | Sex | Male | 33 (55) |
| Female | 27 (45) | ||
| Age | 0–9 | 4 (6) | |
| 10–19 | 0 (0) | ||
| 20–29 | 0 (0) | ||
| 30–39 | 2 (3) | ||
| 40–49 | 3 (5) | ||
| 50–59 | 4 (6) | ||
| 60–69 | 13 (21) | ||
| 70–79 | 25 (41) | ||
| 80–09 | 9 (15) | ||
| Neutrophil count | >40%–<70% | 48 (80) | |
| <40% or >70% | 12 (20) | ||
| CRP level | <0.5 mg/dL | 57 (95) | |
| >0.5 mg/dL | 3 (5) | ||
| MSSA (n = 3) | Sex | Male | 1 (33) |
| Female | 2 (66) | ||
| Age | 0–9 | 0 (0) | |
| 10–19 | 0 (0) | ||
| 20–29 | 0 (0) | ||
| 30–39 | 0 (0) | ||
| 40–49 | 1 (33) | ||
| 50–59 | 0 (0) | ||
| 60–69 | 0 (0) | ||
| 70–79 | 2 (66) | ||
| 80–09 | 0 (0) | ||
| Neutrophil count | >40%–<70% | 1 (33) | |
| <40% or >70% | 2 (66) | ||
| CRP level | <0.5 mg/dL | 3 (100) | |
| >0.5 mg/dL | 0 (0) |
QRDR sequencing and mutation analysis
The QRDR sequencing analysis of a total of 63 S. aureus strains isolated from patients with sepsis was conducted and compared with S. aureus ATCC 12600 to identify DNA mutations. The results of the mutation analysis of gDNA and amino acids in the QRDR, including gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes, are shown in Tables 3 to 6. No mutations were observed in the gyrB gene; therefore, this gene was excluded from the results. Based on the analysis results, the frequency of gDNA mutations and amino acid substitutions was organized in ascending order (Tables 7 and 8). An asteriskindicates a stop codon, and “ND” indicates that mutations were not detected. In the gyrA gene, 94% of mutations resulted in the conversion of cytosine (C) to thymine (T) at position 251. In the parC gene, 84% of mutations resulted in the conversion of C to T at position 239, and in the parE gene, the C to T mutation at position 1,351 was observed in 25% of cases. More than 50% of the DNA mutations were absent in the parE gene. This confirms that the most frequent DNA mutation in the QRDR region is the C to T mutation (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the highest frequency of amino acid substitution in the QRDR was found in the GyrA subunit, where 59 (94%) samples exhibited S84L substitution, and in the ParC subunit, 53 (84%) samples exhibited S80F substitution (Table 8). In contrast, no substitution was found in 41 (65%) samples in the ParE subunit. The results of the MIC test for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin using the broth microdilution method are also shown in Tables 9 and 10.
TABLE 3.
DNA changes detected in the QRDR, including gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA clinical isolatesa
| Strain Gene |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gyrA | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T | C251T |
| 361delA | A501G | A501G | A501G | 361delA | 391delA | A501G | T253C | T253C | G262A | G451A | T253C | 361delA | T500C | A501G | |
| A501G | T513A | T513A | T513A | A418G | A501G | T513A | A501G | 361delA | A501G | A501G | A501G | C525G | T513A | ||
| T513A | C525A | C525A | C525A | 451delG | T513A | C525A | T513A | 451delG | T513A | T513A | T513A | 543delG | C525A | ||
| C525G | A501G | C525A | C525A | A501G | C525A | C525G | C525A | 543delG | |||||||
| 563delT | T513A | T513A | A570C | ||||||||||||
| C525A | C525G | ||||||||||||||
| T563A | |||||||||||||||
| gyrB | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| parC | ND | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239T | C239A | C239A | C239T |
| G250A | G250A | G250A | G250A | ||||||||||||
| 608delA | |||||||||||||||
| 612delA | |||||||||||||||
| parE | ND | ND | 1205delA | ND | C1351T | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | C1351T | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C1351T |
ND, not detected.
TABLE 4.
DNA changes detected in the QRDR, including gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant MSSA clinical isolates
| Gene | Strain 1 | Strain 2 | Strain 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| gyrA | C251T A501G T513A C525A |
NDa | C251T T253C A501G T513A C525A |
| gyrB | ND | ND | ND |
| parC | C239T | ND | C239T |
| parE | G1294A | ND | G1294A |
ND, not detected.
TABLE 5.
Amino acid substitutions detected in the QRDR, including GyrA, GyrB, ParC, and ParE in fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA clinical isolatesa
| Strain | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | |||||||||||||||
| GyrA | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L | S84L |
| M121C | M121C | I131S | S85P | S85P | E88K | I175M | S85P | M121C | L167S | N182I | |||||
| I175M | D151* | M121C | I175M | ||||||||||||
| L188Q | L188* | D151M | N182I | ||||||||||||
| I175M | |||||||||||||||
| GyrB | NDb | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| ParC | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80F | S80Y | S80Y | S80F |
| E84K | E84K | E84K | E84K | ||||||||||||
| N203I | |||||||||||||||
| Q204H | |||||||||||||||
| ParE | P451S | ND | N402T | ND | P451S | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | P451S | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| P451S |
"*” indicates stop codon.
ND, not detected.
TABLE 6.
Amino acid substitutions detected in the QRDR, including GyrA, GyrB, ParC, and ParE in fluoroquinolone-resistant MSSA clinical isolates
| Region | Strain 1 | Strain 2 | Strain 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GyrA | S84L | NDa | S84L S85P |
| GyrB | ND | ND | ND |
| ParC | S80F | ND | S80F |
| ParE | ND | ND | ND |
ND, not detected.
TABLE 7.
Frequency of DNA changes detected in the QRDR, including gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from blood cultureb
| gyrA | parC | parE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA mutations | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
DNA mutations | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
DNA mutations | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
| C251T | 59 (94) | 57 (95) | 2 (67) | C239T | 53 (84) | 51 (85) | 2 (67) | C1351T | 16 (25) | 16 (27) | 0 (0) |
| A501G | 57 (90) | 55 (92) | 2 (67) | A456G | 9 (14) | 9 (15) | 0 (0) | G1294A | 10 (16) | 8 (13) | 2 (67) |
| T513A | 48 (76) | 46 (77) | 2 (67) | A475C | 9 (14) | 9 (15) | 0 (0) | 1205delA | 7 (11) | 7 (12) | 0 (0) |
| C525A | 43 (68) | 41 (68) | 2 (67) | C239A | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | A1295T | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| T253C | 14 (22) | 13 (22) | 1 (33) | G250A | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | C1318T | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| 361delA | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | A251G | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | G1459A | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| C525G | 7 (11) | 7 (12) | 0 (0) | T376C | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | NDa | 33 (52) | 32 (53) | 1 (33) |
| 543delG | 6 (10) | 6 (10) | 0 (0) | 57delA | 1(2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| 391delA | 5 (8) | 5 (8) | 0 (0) | 585delT | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| A570C | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 608delA | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| G451A | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 612delA | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| T563A | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | C397T | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| A418G | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 0 (0) | C457G | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| G262A | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 0 (0) | ND | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 1 (33) | ||||
| 451delG | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| 527insG | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| T500C | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| 563delT | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| ND | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (33) | ||||||||
ND, not detected.
Empty cells indicate that the corresponding DNA mutation was not observed for that gene, as mutation types vary among gyrA, parC, and parE.
TABLE 8.
Frequency of amino acid substitutions detected in the QRDR, including GyrA, GyrB, ParC, and ParE in fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from blood culturea,c
| GyrA | ParC | ParE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid substitutions | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
Amino acid substitutions | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
Amino acid substitutions | Total n (%) |
MRSA n (%) |
MSSA n (%) |
| S84L | 59 (94) | 57 (95) | 2 (67) | S80F | 53 (84) | 51 (81) | 2 (67) | P451S | 16 (25) | 16 (27) | 0 (0) |
| S85P | 14 (22) | 13 (22) | 1 (33) | S80Y | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | N402T | 7 (11) | 7 (12) | 0 (0) |
| M121C | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | E84K | 8 (13) | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | L440F | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| I175M | 7 (11) | 7 (12) | 0 (0) | E84G | 4 (6) | 4 (6) | 0 (0) | D432V | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| N182I | 6 (11) | 6 (10) | 0 (0) | I195M | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | NDb | 41 (65) | 38 (63) | 3 (100) |
| I131S | 5 (8) | 5 (8) | 0 (0) | N203I | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| L188* | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | P153A | 1 (2) | 1 | 0 (0) | ||||
| E88K | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 0 (0) | Q204H | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| A176G | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | R20D | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||
| L167S | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | ND | 2 (2) | 1 (2) | 1 (33) | ||||
| D151* | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| D151M | 1 (2) | 1(2) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| L188Q | 1(2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| M210E | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
| ND | 3 (5) | 2 (3) | 1 (33) | ||||||||
"*” indicates stop codon.
ND, not detected.
Empty cells indicate that the corresponding amino acid substitution was not observed for that gene, as substitution types vary among GyrA, ParC, and ParE.
Fig 4.
Count of DNA base changes in QRDR sites of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus.
TABLE 9.
MIC levels of fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA toward ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin
| Strains | Ciprofloxacin (μg/mL) |
Levofloxacin (μg/mL) |
Strains | Ciprofloxacin (μg/mL) |
Levofloxacin (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 128 | 7 | 31 | 64 | 6 |
| 2 | 32 | 5 | 32 | 16 | 4 |
| 3 | 128 | 7 | 33 | 64 | 6 |
| 4 | 32 | 5 | 34 | 64 | 6 |
| 5 | 128 | 7 | 35 | 256 | 8 |
| 6 | 16 | 4 | 36 | 16 | 4 |
| 7 | 16 | 4 | 37 | 64 | 6 |
| 8 | 512 | 9 | 38 | 256 | 8 |
| 9 | 512 | 9 | 39 | 128 | 7 |
| 10 | 64 | 6 | 40 | 64 | 6 |
| 11 | 128 | 7 | 41 | 32 | 5 |
| 12 | 512 | 9 | 42 | 16 | 4 |
| 13 | 16 | 4 | 43 | 64 | 6 |
| 14 | 64 | 6 | 44 | 2 | 1 |
| 15 | 16 | 4 | 45 | 256 | 8 |
| 16 | 64 | 6 | 46 | 128 | 7 |
| 17 | 128 | 7 | 47 | 64 | 6 |
| 18 | 64 | 6 | 48 | 16 | 4 |
| 19 | 128 | 7 | 49 | 32 | 5 |
| 20 | 16 | 4 | 50 | 256 | 8 |
| 21 | 128 | 7 | 51 | 64 | 6 |
| 22 | 128 | 7 | 52 | 128 | 7 |
| 23 | 128 | 7 | 53 | 256 | 8 |
| 24 | 128 | 7 | 54 | 32 | 5 |
| 25 | 512 | 9 | 55 | 1,024 | 10 |
| 26 | 16 | 4 | 56 | 256 | 8 |
| 27 | 32 | 5 | 57 | 1,024 | 10 |
| 28 | 64 | 6 | 58 | 512 | 9 |
| 29 | 64 | 6 | 59 | 256 | 8 |
| 30 | 128 | 7 | 60 | 32 | 5 |
TABLE 10.
MIC levels of fluoroquinolone-resistant MSSA toward ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin
| Strains | Ciprofloxacin (μg/mL) | Levofloxacin (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 256 | 8 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | 256 | 8 |
Correlation analysis
Based on the previous analysis results, the correlation between the number of mutations and the MIC levels of the two antibiotics was analyzed using Prism. The correlation between the MIC level of ciprofloxacin and DNA mutation is shown in Fig. 5. The correlation P-values for mutations and MIC levels in the gyrA and parE genes were 0.5688 and 0.5615, respectively, resulting in insignificant results. However, the correlation in parC was significant (*P = 0.042). The correlation between MIC levels of ciprofloxacin and substitution in amino acids is shown in Fig. 6. As with the DNA level, the correlation P-values for substitutions and MIC levels in GyrA and ParE were 0.9383 and 0.5786, respectively, resulting in insignificant results, while the correlation in ParC was significant (***P = 0.0001). These findings suggest that the higher the degree of substitution in ParC, which showed the same correlation at both the DNA and amino acid levels, the higher the ciprofloxacin MIC. The correlation between MIC levels in levofloxacin and DNA mutation is shown in Fig. 7. The correlation P-values for mutations and MIC levels in the gyrA and parE genes were 0.1303 and 0.3422, respectively, resulting in insignificant results, and the correlation in the parC gene was significant (*P = 0.0293). The correlation between MIC levels of levofloxacin and substitution in amino acids is shown in Fig. 8. Similar to the DNA level, the correlation P-values for substitutions and MIC levels in GyrA and ParE were 0.1569 and 0.0925, respectively, resulting in insignificant results, and the correlation in ParC was significant (****P < 0.0001). These analysis results indicate that substitutions at the ParC site, which are statistically significant for both antibiotics, likely affect the MIC.
Fig 5.
Correlation of DNA mutations in QRDR with MIC levels of ciprofloxacin in MRSA and MSSA. (A) Total of QRDR, (B) gyrA, (C) parC, and (D) parE.
Fig 6.
Correlation of amino acid substitutions in QRDR with MIC levels of ciprofloxacin in MRSA and MSSA. (A) Total of QRDR, (B) GyrA, (C) ParC, and (D) ParE.
Fig 7.
Correlation of DNA mutations in QRDR with MIC levels of levofloxacin in MRSA and MSSA. (A) Total of QRDR, (B) gyrA, (C) parC, and (D) parE.
Fig 8.
Correlation of amino acid substitutions in QRDR with MIC levels of levofloxacin in MRSA and MSSA. (A) Total of QRDR, (B) GyrA, (C) ParC, and (D) ParE.
In conclusion, it can be inferred that the higher the degree of amino acid substitution at the ParC site among the four subunits of QRDR that determine resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics, the higher the MIC level.
Pattern of amino acid substitutions
Through the correlation analysis of the number of mutations with the MIC, it was found that the substitutions at the ParC in the QRDR affected the MIC. Therefore, we analyzed which substitutions at the amino acid level, expressed as real proteins in ParC, affect the MIC.
We identified the MIC levels and the number of samples for each combination of amino acid substitutions in ParC (Table 11). The group with only the S80F substitution was designated as Group A, the group with S80F and E84K substitutions was designated as Group B, the group with only S80Y substitution was designated as Group C, the group with S80Y and E84G substitutions was designated as Group D, the group with R20D and S80F substitutions was designated as Group E, the group with S80F, E84K, and I195M substitutions was designated as Group F, the group with S80F, E84K, N203I, and Q204H substitutions was designated as Group G, the group with S80F and P153A substitutions was designated as Group H, and Group I was designated as a group that did not show any mutations.
TABLE 11.
Pattern of ParC amino acid substitutions detected in fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from blood culture
| Group | Pattern of amino acid substitutions in ParC |
Total n = 63 (100) |
MRSA n = 63 (100) |
MSSA n = 3 (100) |
MIC level (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciprofloxacin min-max (median) |
Levofloxacin min-max (median) |
|||||
| A | S80F | 43 (68) | 41 (68) | 2 (67) | 2–512 (64) | 1–256 (16) |
| B | S80F + E84K | 6 (10) | 6 (10) | 0 (0) | 64–512 (384) | 16–512 (512) |
| C | S80Y | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 16–256 (48) | 4–16 (10) |
| D | S80Y + E84G | 4 (6) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 256–1,024 (640) | 32 (32) |
| E | R20D + S80F | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 128 (128) | 64 (64) |
| F | S80F + E84K + I195M | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 512 (512) | 512 (512) |
| G | S80F + E84K + N203I + Q204H | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 64 (64) | 512 (512) |
| H | S80F + P153A | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 128 (128) | 16 (16) |
| I | NDa | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 1 (33) | 1–64 (32.5) | 0.5–256 (128.25) |
| Total | 63 (100) | 60 (100) | 3 (100) | |||
ND, not detected.
Among the 63 S. aureus strains isolated from patients with sepsis, the most common substitutions combination in ParC was found in Group A (68%). All groups commonly had substitution at codon position 80 (Table 11).
In the case of Group I, which included one MRSA and one MSSA sample, no substitution appeared in ParC, but these samples were resistant to fluoroquinolone drugs. No mutations were found in these samples for the gyrA, gyrB, or parE subunits similar to the parC subunit.
Additionally, we compared the MICs of three groups in ParC: group with the substitution at position serine 80 (S80) only (Groups A and C), group with substitutions at both S80 and glutamic acid 84 (E84) simultaneously (Groups B, D, F, and G), and the other group with other substitutions except for the substitution at position E84 (Groups E, H, and I).
When comparing the ciprofloxacin MIC levels according to the groups of substitution sites, the group with substitutions at both S80 and E84 had significantly higher MIC values compared to the group with the S80 substitution alone and the group with other substitutions (****P < 0.0001, ***P = 0.0009). Similarly, when comparing levofloxacin MIC levels according to the groups of substitution sites, the group with substitutions at both S80 and E84 had significantly higher MIC values compared to the group with the S80 substitution alone and the group with other substitutions (****P < 0.0001, *P = 0.0244) (Fig. 9).
Fig 9.
Comparison of fluoroquinolone MIC levels according to substitution site groups. (A) Ciprofloxacin, (B) Levofloxacin. Groups of mutation site: 80, group with the substitution at position serine 80 only; 80 + 84 + α, group with substitution at both serine 80 and glutamic acid 84 simultaneously; etc., the other group with other substitutions except for the substitution at position glutamic acid 84.
DISCUSSION
AMR is a global health problem that is expected to cause many deaths in the future (21). Among several antibiotic-resistant bacteria, S. aureus is a major cause of HAIs, especially MRSA, a representative pathogen with a consistently high mortality rate (22). S. aureus is resistant to several antibiotics, including methicillin, and fluoroquinolone resistance is particularly difficult to treat. The frequency of fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA is particularly high (17). As antibiotic consumption increases worldwide, studies on antibiotic resistance mechanisms are necessary because the crisis of antibiotic resistance must be overcome.
Therefore, in the present study, we analyzed mutations in the QRDR, including DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV subunit sites known to determine resistance to quinolone drugs, using S. aureus clinical isolate that is resistant to fluoroquinolone in patients with sepsis in the Republic of Korea. In addition, the MIC test for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was conducted using the broth microdilution method. Then, we analyzed the correlation between the degree of mutation in QRDR and the MIC level of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Results for the correlation of the number of DNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in QRDR with MIC levels of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin show that the correlation in parC was significant among gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE in QRDR involved in resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Namely, it suggests that the higher the degree of amino acid substitution at the ParC site among the four subunits of QRDR that determine resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics, the higher the MIC level. Furthermore, in ParC, when the substitutions at E84K and E84G occurred with the S80F and S80Y substitutions, the MIC level was markedly increased. Additionally, the C to T mutation appeared most frequently among DNA base mutations in all QRDR sites of S. aureus. This result was consistent with previous studies showing that DNA deamination in Escherichia coli frequently causes these mutations (23). This suggests that the QRDR site of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus is also likely to be influenced by mechanisms related to the deamination of DNA.
In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that the mutation level of parC in QRDR might affect the resistance to fluoroquinolone drugs such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Additionally, the simultaneous appearance of substitutions at E84 with S80 might affect the high resistance of fluoroquinolone drugs such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. This result agrees with a previous study showing that the simultaneous appearance of substitutions at E84 with S80 affects the high resistance to norfloxacin in fluoroquinolones (10). Also, these results agree with previous studies that have shown high ciprofloxacin resistance in S. aureus with double substitutions, where S80 and either E84 or A48 substitutions co-occurred in ParC (24, 25). However, there have been studies showing that these double substitutions were not associated with high levofloxacin resistance (24). In contrast, we found that these double substitutions were also associated with high levofloxacin resistance in S. aureus from the Republic of Korea in this study (Fig. 9). Similarly, there is also a result showing that delafloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates exhibited high resistance when the 84th substitution occurred in ParC (26). Additionally, in ParC, all isolates except non-mutation isolates had either S80Y or S80F substitutions. These findings were consistent with previous studies showing that serine substitution occurs most frequently in QRDR sites, and it is expected that serine substitution is the main cause of quinolone resistance. It will be easier to identify resistant bacteria if a method to quickly and easily detect it is developed (13). Furthermore, silent base mutation isolates also existed. Notably, one isolate in Group I exhibited no mutations in any of the QRDR (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE), despite showing resistance. This suggests that mechanisms other than QRDR mutations—such as efflux pump overexpression or plasmid-mediated resistance—may be involved in conferring fluoroquinolone resistance in certain strains. Therefore, further studies are required to confirm the corresponding resistant mechanisms, such as the efflux pump genes, including norA, norB, and norC. In addition, our study also identified several less commonly reported substitutions, including E84G and combinations such as S80F + E84G, as well as rare variants like R20D, I195M, Q204H, and P153A. To our knowledge, these latter mutations have not been frequently documented in existing literature, suggesting the possibility of regional or strain-specific mutation patterns. Further phylogenetic or comparative genomic analyses may be needed to determine whether such patterns are lineage-dependent.
In summary, the present study confirms that the most frequent DNA base mutation in the QRDR of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus was C to T. Additionally, the degree of mutation in the parC region of QRDR affects the MIC level. Furthermore, the E84 position is an important factor in the treatment and resistance management of S. aureus isolated from hospitals in the Republic of Korea that exhibit high resistance to fluoroquinolone agents such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin.
Results of these studies on the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance are expected to contribute to the development of effective antibiotic treatments, infection prevention and control, and improved diagnostic methods. They will also play an important role in creating an environment that reduces the indiscriminate use of antibiotics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) program through the Instiute for Regional Innovation System & Education in Busan Metropolitan City, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Busan Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-02-010-001).
Contributor Information
Min Park, Email: mpark@masan.ac.kr.
Sunghyun Kim, Email: shkim0423@cup.ac.kr.
Nagendran Tharmalingam, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
ETHICS APPROVAL
The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Catholic University of Pusan (approval number CUPIRB-24-01-008).
REFERENCES
- 1. Li W, Separovic F, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Wade JD. 2021. Chemically modified and conjugated antimicrobial peptides against superbugs. Chem Soc Rev 50:4932–4973. doi: 10.1039/d0cs01026j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Flora M, Perrotta F, Nicolai A, Maffucci R, Pratillo A, Mollica M, Bianco A, Calabrese C. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus in chronic airway diseases: an overview. Respir Med 155:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Matot I, Sprung CL. 2001. Definition of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 27:S3–9. doi: 10.1007/pl00003795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. David MZ, Daum RS. 2017. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 409:325–383. doi: 10.1007/82_2017_42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kwiecinski JM, Horswill AR. 2020. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: pathogenesis and regulatory mechanisms. Curr Opin Microbiol 53:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Otto M. 2012. MRSA virulence and spread. Cell Microbiol 14:1513–1521. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01832.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hiramatsu K, Katayama Y, Matsuo M, Sasaki T, Morimoto Y, Sekiguchi A, Baba T. 2014. Multi-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and future chemotherapy. J Infect Chemother 20:593–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, Harbarth S. 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:18033. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Peng H, Liu D, Ma Y, Gao W. 2018. Comparison of community- and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Chinese tertiary hospital, 2012-2017. Sci Rep 8:17916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36206-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Horii T, Suzuki Y, Monji A, Morita M, Muramatsu H, Kondo Y, Doi M, Takeshita A, Kanno T, Maekawa M. 2003. Detection of mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions in levofloxacin- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: effects of the mutations on fluoroquinolone MICs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 46:139–145. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00037-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kang C-I, Song J-H. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance in Asia: current epidemiology and clinical implications. Infect Chemother 45:22. doi: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.1.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gade ND, Qazi MS. 2013. Fluoroquinolone therapy in Staphylococcus aureus infections: where do we stand? J Lab Physicians 5:109–112. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.119862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Correia S, Poeta P, Hébraud M, Capelo JL, Igrejas G. 2017. Mechanisms of quinolone action and resistance: where do we stand? J Med Microbiol 66:551–559. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chakrakodi B, Prabhakara S, Nagaraj S, Etienne J, Arakere G. 2014. High prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in community associated Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care Indian Hospital. AiM 04:133–141. doi: 10.4236/aim.2014.42018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hooper DC, Jacoby GA. 2015. Mechanisms of drug resistance: quinolone resistance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1354:12–31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Moreno-Flores A, Potel-Alvarellos C, Otero-Fernández S, Álvarez-Fernández M. 2018. Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) 36:403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2017.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jacoby GA. 2005. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones. Clin Infect Dis 41:S120–6. doi: 10.1086/428052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Coskun-Ari FF, Bosgelmez-Tinaz G. 2008. grlA and gyrA mutations and antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical isolates of ciprofloxacin- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Eur J Med Res 13:366–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhang K, McClure J-A, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. 2005. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43:5026–5033. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5026-5033.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ito H, Yoshida H, Bogaki-Shonai M, Niga T, Hattori H, Nakamura S. 1994. Quinolone resistance mutations in the DNA gyrase gyrA and gyrB genes of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2014–2023. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.9.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tang KWK, Millar BC, Moore JE. 2023. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Br J Biomed Sci 80:11387. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2023.11387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. 2019. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:203–218. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Beletskii A, Bhagwat AS. 1996. Transcription-induced mutations: increase in C to T mutations in the nontranscribed strand during transcription in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13919–13924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schmitz FJ, Hofmann B, Hansen B, Scheuring S, Lückefahr M, Klootwijk M, Verhoef J, Fluit A, Heinz HP, Köhrer K, Jones ME. 1998. Relationship between ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin and moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) MICs and mutations in grlA, grlB, gyrA and gyrB in 116 unrelated clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 41:481–484. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.4.481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. de Oliveira TLR, Cavalcante FS, Chamon RC, Ferreira RBR, Dos Santos KRN. 2019. Genetic mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region are related to changes in the epidemiological profile of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 19:236–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.05.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. de la Rosa JMO, Fernández MA, Rodríguez-Villodres Á, Casimiro-Soriguer CS, Cisneros JM, Lepe JA. 2023. High-level delafloxacin resistance through the combination of two different mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 61:106795. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









