Abstract
New and emerging infections with blood-borne pathogens pose an ongoing threat to the safety of blood transfusions and transplants. Bioarchives of stored blood donor samples represent a valuable pathogen screening resource for both ensuring safety of blood transfusions and for wider public health infectious disease surveillance. Large scale testing of donors enables early detection of pathogen spread and extent of population exposure. We have implemented two complementary systems for the bioarchiving of blood donor samples in England for these purposes. The CODONET bioarchive collects samples from geographically targeted regions of potential pathogen emergence. Consenting donors provide detailed information to allow for risk assessment and, importantly, to distinguish imported from autochthonously acquired infection. Separately, the blood donor surveillance archive (BDSA) stores 100 or 200 pools of 24 randomly selected, fully anonymised donation samples from donors in England every 2 weeks, allowing large-scale continuous sampling. This enables rapid evaluation of the presence of blood-borne pathogens in donor populations and a large-scale epidemiological tool to detect pathogen emergence in real-time. Combined, these bioarchives allow for proactive assessment of donation transmission risk, and as targeted population-wide archives, contribute to public health surveillance of emerging pathogens and pandemic spread.
Keywords: West Nile Virus, Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Blood donor, Bioarchive, Pandemic response, Emerging infection, England, blood-borne infections, vector-borne infections, bacterial infections, viral infections, tick-borne encephalitis - TBE, West Nile virus, outbreaks, laboratory surveillance, sentinel surveillance
Background
National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) is a large blood service responsible for the collection, screening and provision of ca 2 million red cell and other blood component units per year to hospitals for transfusion in England. Transmission of HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis E (HEV) virus and of bacteria in platelets have been virtually eliminated since the introduction of stringent screening to ensure blood safety. However, ongoing horizon scanning and risk assessments, not only in England but also in the European Union (EU) and United States (US), are pivotal for identifying and mitigating any potential future microbiological risk threatening blood safety [1].
Outbreaks and pandemics caused by infectious pathogens are not new; in the past 100 years, human populations have been subject to recurrent and often devastating plagues and virus outbreaks caused by smallpox, measles and coronaviruses, as well as retroviruses such as HIV-1 and Ebola virus in West Africa, and many pandemic influenza A viruses (IAV) (reviewed in reference [2]). In addition, the global outbreaks of dengue virus (DENV), especially in South East Asia and the Americas with local introduction in Europe, and the very recent Oropouche virus outbreaks in South America exemplify the change in circulation of arboviruses. This change follows the spread of mosquito or tick vectors in response to multiple factors including climate change and human activities such as international travel and trade [3-5].
In Europe, the recent emergence of infections with West Nile virus (WNV) in Germany and France has been associated with the presence of Culex mosquito vectors [6]. West Nile virus became permanently established in certain parts of Germany from 2018 [6] and blood donor screening in endemic areas in Germany was implemented in 2020 [7]. Of concern for United Kingdom (UK) blood safety was the detection of WNV in two pools of native Aedes vexans mosquitoes collected in 2023 near Nottingham in mid-England [8]. In addition, there are reports that Culex modestus has recently become established in the south-east of England and may act as a bridge vector for the introduction of WNV from continental Europe [9]. There is a further potential threat from the related Usutu virus (USUV) whose vector, Culex pipiens is established in the UK and USUV-infected birds and mosquitoes have been reported in the London area [10].
The recent local expansion of DENV infections in France, Italy and Spain [11] is potentially worrisome should the Aedes albopictus vector range expand further northwards and over winter in the UK. There has been a parallel expansion of tick-borne diseases, including tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, into new areas of Europe. Since 2012, reported cases of TBE have increased in incidence and geographical range across the European continent even though suspected or confirmed cases of transfusion-transmitted infections remain rare exceptions [12]. The first probable case of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) acquired in England was in 2019 [13] followed by two laboratory-confirmed cases of TBEV with likely UK acquisition in 2022 [14]. The first case presented with encephalitis (TBE), but no clinical data were available for the next two TBEV cases. Surveillance of sentinel animals across England and targeted surveillance of Ixodes ricinus ticks has identified enzootic foci of TBEV in several areas [15].
Measures taken by many countries towards ‘pandemic preparedness’ demonstrate a commitment towards establishing a more effective and pre-specified pathway to respond to future public health crises. Surveillance and protection of the blood supply represents a major component of such planning. Here we describe the development and set-up of two sample archiving programmes that will provide a novel and robust infrastructure with which to proactively assess threats to blood safety from emerging pathogens.
Creation of a Donation Bioarchive to Study and Assess the Spread of Newly Emerging Pathogens (CODONET)
The first archive programme, Creation of a Donation Bioarchive to Study and Assess the Spread of Newly Emerging Pathogens (CODONET), enables geographically targeted collection and archiving of well-characterised donor samples for surveillance purposes. In England, blood donors are enrolled through email invitation to participate in the study and complete a consent form before responding to an electronic survey created and operated by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). The survey collects detailed demographic information and medical and vaccination histories from the donors to facilitate interpretation of results and determine risk factors for infection. Detailed information on contact with animals and vectors and outdoor occupational and recreational activities is also collected for investigation of zoonotic infections (Table 1; the full form is provided in Supplement S1). Once a donor has consented, ca 2 ml of residual plasma sample from their next routine blood donation is retained after routine testing and added in multiple aliquots to the CODONET bioarchive.
Table 1. Abbreviated summary of donor information collected in the Creation of a Donation Bioarchive to Study and Assess the Spread of Newly Emerging Pathogens (CODONET) questionnairea, England.
| Donor characteristics | Information parameters |
|---|---|
| Age | Age (in years) |
| Biological sex, gender | Male / female and gender identify |
| Ethnic group | Asian or Asian British |
| Black, Black British, Caribbean or African | |
| Mixed or multiple ethnic groups | |
| Other | |
| White | |
| Residency | Current residential postcode |
| Duration of residence | |
| Country of birth (if not UK) | |
| Other countries of residence | |
| Travel | Travel outside the UK in the past 5 years: Continents and countries visited, frequency, urban or rural areas |
| Vaccinations | Vaccinations for unusual or travel-related diseases Vaccine type: Tick-borne encephalitis, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, dengue fever, Q fever, rabies, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Lyme disease (vaccine discontinued), smallpox, monkeypox |
| Timing of most recent vaccination | |
| Medical history | Previous deferral from blood donation |
| Previous zoonotic diseases and recency of diagnosis | |
| Exposure to ticks | History of tick bites in past 5 years |
| Location(s) of tick bites, UK, abroad | |
| How frequently bitten and frequency of exposure to areas with high numbers of ticks | |
| Exposure to mosquitoes | History of mosquito bites in past 5 years |
| Location(s) of mosquito bites, UK, abroad | |
| How frequently bitten and frequency of exposure to areas with high numbers of mosquitoes | |
| Exposure to animals | History of animal exposure in past 10 years |
| Reason and frequency of contact with wild, farm or pet species: Pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, deer, poultry, gamebirds, wild birds, pet birds, camels, llamas, alpacas, bats, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, mice, rats, hamsters, gerbils, reptiles, horses, non-human primates, insects, fish | |
| History of animal bites | |
| Food products | List of dietary exclusions |
| Consumption of unpasteurised milk | |
| Outdoor exposure | Outdoor employment in past 10 years, including: Wildlife ranger, deer management, forestry worker, forestry ranger, park ranger, countryside management, conservation, gamekeeper, gamebird management, professional beater, farm worker, farm manager, small holder, gardener, outdoor pursuits instructor, environmental scientist, field ecologist, veterinarian, water worker, fisherman, other |
| Duration of outdoor occupation(s) | |
| Outdoor hobbies or leisure activities in past 10 years, including: Urban walking or running, rural walking or running, urban dog walking, rural dog walking, orienteering, climbing, bouldering, cycling (road or off-road), horse riding, golf, field sport (cricket, football, rugby), gardening, camping (including attending festivals),forest or conservation volunteer, recreational shooting or hunting, recreational deer stalking or beating, freshwater sports (swimming, sailing, rowing, caving, fishing), sea sports, other | |
| Duration of outdoor activities |
UK: United Kingdom.
a Complete form provided in Supplement S1.
In addition to quantifying past or current infection frequencies in blood donors, detailed data collected on donors through CODONET will help determine if cases are locally acquired or acquired through international travel. Information is also collected on specific risk factors for infections, such as age, biological sex, gender and pursuit of outdoor activities that may increase exposure to mosquitoes or ticks, as well as information on vaccination history. These collected data will be essential for interpreting the serosurveillance data for viruses such as TBEV and for assessing and identifying risk factors. As appropriate, the CODONET framework also allows for donors to be recalled, resampled and reinterviewed to verify information provided when evaluating results that are potentially important to the blood supply or public health. Follow-up of recipients will be organised via NHSBT if results with potential clinical or public health importance are identified.
One initial application of the CODONET archive will be to determine whether WNV, and USUV infections are becoming established in areas of England and present a risk for autochthonous infections in humans. To date, a total of 42,000 regular donors in NHSBT donor centres in the appropriate postcodes have been identified and will be invited to take part in the CODONET programme to identify serological evidence for exposure to WNV (Figure; a full list of postcodes is appended in Supplementary Table S1A; Supplement S1). Those with confirmed serological evidence for past WNV infections analysed by ELISA and neutralising antibody testing, will be related to demographic, vaccination and vector or animal exposure information from donors to assess the occurrence of potential locally acquired infections.
Figure.
Regions sampled for West Nile virus and tick-borne encephalitis virus serosurveillance, England, 2024–2025
TBEV: tick-borne encephalitis virus; WNV: West Nile virus.
A second planned application of the CODONET archive is to determine when and where new tick-borne infections are emerging in England, such as TBEV. To prepare for this, we have initiated targeted donor sample collections in these two areas (Figure; green shaded areas; Supplementary Table S1B, Supplement S1). Samples will be analysed serologically to assess the occurrence of potential locally acquired TBEV infections, including those which may have been asymptomatic and have therefore gone undetected. IgG seroprevalence estimates in blood donors from these ‘tick-risk’ areas will be compared with blood donor populations elsewhere in southern England where tick exposure risk is lower (such as the regions identified as being at risk for WNV and USUV; Figure).
Blood Donor Surveillance Archive
Bioarchiving of surplus plasma volumes of mini-pools derived from 24 blood and platelet donations used for routine donation screening by nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HIV, HCV, HBV and HEV has been initiated. Between 100 and 200 mini-pools (representing 2,400 and 4,800 donors, respectively) are collected every 2 weeks and are anonymised and unlinked before shipment to the NHSBT bioarchive. Pools and their component donations cannot be linked to donors but provide a resource to rapidly determine population-level viraemia and seroprevalences to emerging infections or novel pathogens in a pandemic situation, with the necessary restriction on analytical sensitivity for samples with low pathogen loads. Between 10 May 2023 and 28 February 2025, a total of 4,097 pools corresponding to 98,328 donor samples had been archived. Complementary roles and differences between the Blood Donor Surveillance Archive (BDSA) and CODONET bioarchives are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Complementary roles and differences between the Creation of a Donation Bioarchive to Study and Assess the Spread of Newly Emerging Pathogens (CODONET) and the Blood Donor Surveillance Archive bioarchives, England.
| Archive type | CODONET (Creation of a Donation Bioarchive to Study and Assess the Spread of Newly Emerging Pathogens) | BDSA (Blood Donor Surveillance Archive) |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Targeted testing of donors. With ability to focus recruitment or testing according to risk factors, travel history and vector exposure | Rapid, large-scale untargeted molecular and serosurveillance population studies in response to emerging or pandemic pathogens |
| Strengths | Additional donor data allow for identification of autochthonous cases, risk factors and epidemiological interpretation | Provides rapid evaluation of the spread or population exposure to emerging infections in a large sample base |
| Sample type | Surplus plasma from donor’s next blood donation | Surplus plasma from mini-pools of 24 donors |
| Collection frequency | Continuous recruitment of donors. Sample collected when consented donor next donates | 100 (winter) or 200 mini-pools (summer) from 2,400 to 4,800 randomly selected donors every 2 weeks |
| Data collected | Donor completes questionnaire providing demographic data, vaccine, travel, occupational and exposure history which is linked to the sample | None, beyond the standard collection every 2 weeks |
| Targeted recruitment | Yes. Email recruitment to active blood donors. Geographical or demographic targeting possible e.g. donors living in areas of known vector presence | No. Random national sampling |
| Sample linking and anonymisation | Pseudoanonymised. Can link back to donor for recall or further testing or questioning | Full anonymisation. Not possible to link back to donor |
| Consent | Explicit consent to participate provided electronically | Consent is covered by general NHSBT donor consent |
| Ethics | Ethical approval from the NW England Regional Ethics committee (reference 24/NW/0127) | Approved internally by NHSBT (BS-CARE, NCI) |
| Scalability | Staff resources limit collections to ca 5,000 samples per year | Readily scaled-up to all donors in England as required |
| Collection started | December 2024 | May 2023 |
BS-CARE: Blood Supply Clinical Audit, Risk and Effectiveness Committee of NHSBT; NCI: Non-Clinical Issue; NHS: National Health Service; NHSBT: National Health Service Blood and Transplant; NW: North West.
Bioarchives for hemovigilance and as a public health resource
We plan prospective long-term maintenance of the BDSA and CODONET bioarchives to ensure that archived sample resources are in place should another pandemic or major pathogen emergence occur in the future. For example, large serosurveillance and epidemiological studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic using residual blood donation samples [16]. The bioarchives also provide a resource for evidence-based assessments of microbiology transmission risk arising from horizon-scanning by the Standing Advisory Committee for Transfusion Transmitted Infections (SACTTI) and other hemovigilance activities in the UK and elsewhere. In addition, these archives are not limited to the study of only infectious agents that are a threat to blood safety but can also be used for wider public health surveillance. Specifically, we demonstrated the lack of monkeypox virus (MPXV) circulation among the blood donor population using the mini-pools for MPXV DNA testing following the emergence of MPXV in the UK and in other western countries in April–May 2022 predominantly among certain groups of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) [17].
Among other potential emerging pathogen threats, the archives can potentially be used to investigate human circulation of high pathogenicity strains of H5N1 IAV, following the description of more than 60 human cases in late 2024 and one death [18]. While experience from the swine-origin H1N1 IAV pandemic in 2009 suggests that IAV is not a specific threat to blood safety, with asymptomatic donors showing no evidence of viraemia [19,20], infections with the more pathogenic H5N1 in the prodromal stage may show greater systemic spread and viraemia frequencies. The BDSA and CODONET archives are of further potential value as a resource to monitor population exposure and timing through the application of H5N1-specific serology assays.
Establishment of the bioarchives
To maximise their operational simplicity, both bioarchives were designed at the outset to avoid additional donor sampling by using leftover samples and to avoid imposing additional workloads at donor centres through the use of online consent and survey completion by donors before donation (CODONET). The principal operational complexity of the CODONET bioarchive was the completion of internal risk-assessments, documentation and contracts with collaborators at UKHSA. In addition to data governance and information storage, consent and survey information provided by the donor had to be linked to their donation sample while preserving anonymity through recoding. Sampling can be targeted based on the geographical location of the identified risk, and similarly, the questionnaire can be modified to cover the suspected risk.
Conclusion
We believe that the establishment of CODONET and BDSA bioarchives and a capacity for large-scale and rapid screening for novel and emerging pathogens represent a concrete and decisive step towards preparedness for the next emerging or pandemic pathogen. For most emerging infections, blood donors are reasonably representative of the general population and are of considerable value as a sentinel group used to monitor population exposure to emerging and future potential pandemic pathogens. However, we acknowledge the blood donor population is not fully representative of the population; limitations include the age range restriction of donors (17 to around 70 years), under-representation of some ethnic minorities and of donors at risk for sexually-transmitted infections including MPXV, where potential donors reporting high-risk sexual activity are excluded [21]. The dilution of samples in mini-pools of 24 limits the sensitivity of testing archive samples with low viral loads or antibody titres. Nevertheless, the use of the two bioarchives to provide the earliest possible data on the spread of novel and emerging pathogens and the safety of the blood supply will inform the national public health response on aspects that were incomplete or missing in previous outbreaks and pandemics. Establishing these bioarchives also addresses potential shortcomings in the UK blood services in terms of capacity to respond rapidly and proactively to emerging pathogens, as recently highlighted by the UK Infected Blood Inquiry [22].
Ethical statement
Collection of donor information and pathogen testing using the CODONET sample archive has received ethical approval (IRAS ID 335458) from the NW England Regional Ethics committee (reference 24/NW/0127; https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/application-summaries/research-summaries/donation-bioarchive-for-pandemic-preparedness/); sample release through NHSBT Non-Clinical Issue (NCI) is approved (NCI2496). Collection and testing of samples in the BDSA is approved by NHSBT under NCI Approval number NCI2104.
Use of artificial intelligence tools
None declared.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of several teams at NHS Blood and Transplant who have helped with various study processes. At NHS Blood and Transplant, Lee Parvin-Cooper and the Direct Marketing team, Emily Baldwin in the Donor Insight team, Vincent Divine and the Microbiology Services Admin team, the Microbiology Services senior nurses and the NCI team. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Kelly Venus, Matt Hoskins and Jack Price in Filton for collecting and transporting samples for the BDSA. At UKHSA we include Charlotte Robin for feedback on the CODONET questionnaire and Meaghan Kall and Kelsey McOwat for technical support with the electronic survey platform. Finally, we acknowledge the help from Cassy Fiford and lay contributors from the Blood and Transplant Research Unit- Genomics to Enhance Microbiology Screening Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary Data
Authors’ contributions: Heli Harvala: conceptualisation, data curation, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing. Shannah Secret: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing. Peter Simmonds: conceptualisation, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing. Janie Olver: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, software, supervision, validation. Piya Rajendra: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources. Eilish Hart: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources. Abigail Lamikanra: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources. Hoi Pat Tsang: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources. Niel Garrett: conceptualisation, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation. Claire Reynolds: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, visualisation. David Roberts: funding acquisition, investigation, project administration, resources, supervision. Susan R Brailsford: conceptualisation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, software, validation. Amanda Semper: conceptualisation, data curation, investigation, methodology, resources, software, supervision, validation.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Institutes for Health and Care Research [grant number NIHR203338]. The funding body had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript writing. JO, EH and AS are supported by the UK Health Security Agency. EH and AS are affiliated with the National Institute for Health & Social Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections (grant NINR200907) at the University of Liverpool in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), and in collaboration with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and The University of Oxford. EH studies at the University of Liverpool and is based at UKHSA, Porton Down. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or the UK Health Security Agency.
Data availability
All data presented in the manuscript or supplementary material are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Neuberger J, Brailsford SR, Mallinson G, Murphy MF, Simmonds P. Challenges for the maintaining the microbiological safety of the UK blood supply. Clin Med (Lond). 2023;23(2):151-6. 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yen HL, Webster RG. Pandemic influenza as a current threat. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;333:3-24. 10.1007/978-3-540-92165-3_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Moreira-Soto A, Postigo-Hidalgo I, Tabares X, Roell Y, Fischer C, Gotuzzo E, et al. Transfusion-transmitted infections: risks and mitigation strategies for Oropouche virus and other emerging arboviruses in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025;46:101089. 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Giménez-Richarte Á, de Salazar MO, Arbona C, Giménez-Richarte MP, Collado M, Fernández PL, et al. Prevalence of Chikungunya, Dengue and Zika viruses in blood donors: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Blood Transfus. 2022;20(4):267-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Stanley J, Chongkolwatana V, Duong PT, Kitpoka P, Stramer SL, Dung NTT, et al. Detection of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika RNA in blood donors from Southeast Asia. Transfusion. 2021;61(1):134-43. 10.1111/trf.16110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. de la Calle-Prieto F, Arsuaga M, Rodríguez-Sevilla G, Paiz NS, Díaz-Menéndez M. The current status of arboviruses with major epidemiological significance in Europe. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2024;42(9):516-26. 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Orru’ S, Reissinger A, Filomena A, Heitmann A, Funk MB, Schmidt-Chanasit J, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of West Nile virus screening by analysing suspected positive donations among blood donors, Germany, 2020 to 2023. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(8):2400373. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.8.2400373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bruce RC, Abbott AJ, Jones BP, Gardner BL, Gonzalez E, Ionescu AM, et al. Detection of West Nile virus via retrospective mosquito arbovirus surveillance, United Kingdom, 2025. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(28):2500401. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.28.2500401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Golding N, Nunn MA, Medlock JM, Purse BV, Vaux AG, Schäfer SM. West Nile virus vector Culex modestus established in southern England. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5(1):32. 10.1186/1756-3305-5-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lawson B, Robinson RA, Briscoe AG, Cunningham AA, Fooks AR, Heaver JP, et al. Combining host and vector data informs emergence and potential impact of an Usutu virus outbreak in UK wild birds. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):10298. 10.1038/s41598-022-13258-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Dengue. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2022. Stockholm: ECDC; 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/DENGUE_AER_2022_Report.pdf
- 12.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The risk of tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission via substances of human origin. Stockholm: ECDC; 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/TBEV-SoHO-november2024.pdf
- 13. Kreusch TM, Holding M, Hewson R, Harder T, Medlock JM, Hansford KM, et al. A probable case of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) acquired in England, July 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(47):1900679. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.47.1900679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Callaby H, Beard KR, Wakerley D, Lake MA, Osborne J, Brown K, et al. TBE working group . Tick-borne encephalitis: from tick surveillance to the first confirmed human cases, the United Kingdom, 2015 to 2023. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(5):2400404. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.5.2400404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Holding M, Dowall SD, Medlock JM, Carter DP, McGinley L, Curran-French M, et al. Detection of new endemic focus of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Hampshire/Dorset border, England, September 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(47):1900658. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.47.1900658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thompson CP, Grayson NE, Paton RS, Bolton JS, Lourenço J, Penman BS, et al. Detection of neutralising antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 to determine population exposure in Scottish blood donors between March and May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(42):2000685. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.42.2000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Knight C, Andreani J, Garrett N, Winter M, Golubchik T, Breuer J, et al. Absence of detectable monkeypox virus DNA in 11,000 English blood donations during the 2022 outbreak. Transfusion. 2023;63(4):690-5. 10.1111/trf.17266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Garg S, Reinhart K, Couture A, Kniss K, Davis CT, Kirby MK, et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Infections in Humans. N Engl J Med. 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Stramer SL, Collins C, Nugent T, Wang X, Fuschino M, Heitman JW, et al. Sensitive detection assays for influenza RNA do not reveal viremia in US blood donors. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(6):886-94. 10.1093/infdis/jir863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Matsumoto C, Sobata R, Uchida S, Hidaka T, Momose S, Hino S, et al. Risk for transmission of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus by blood transfusion. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(4):722-3. 10.3201/eid1604.091795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Harvala H, Simmonds P. Evaluating the risk of transfusion and transplant-transmitted monkeypox infections. Transfus Med. 2022;32(6):460-6. 10.1111/tme.12918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mills R, Merz EM, Croucher M, Masser B, Brailsford SR, Smith R, et al. The infected blood inquiry: Impact on public perceptions of blood supply risk, safety, and donation attitudes. Transfus Med. 2024;34(6):478-90. 10.1111/tme.13108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data presented in the manuscript or supplementary material are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

