Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Mar 11;48(5):3180–3193. doi: 10.1007/s10753-025-02258-9

Canagliflozin Attenuates Podocyte Inflammatory Injury through Suppressing the TXNIP/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway in Diabetic Kidney Disease Mice

Siyu Li 1,#, Jie Wang 2,#, Ying Chen 2,#, Yanlu Cheng 2, Yanan Wang 2, Nuowen Xu 2, Hao Wang 2, Li Wang 1,2, Yangfeng Chi 2, Xiaoxue Ye 2, Yanting Shi 2, Ji Fang 2, Xingmei Yao 2, Jiebo Huang 2, Qing Xia 4, Tianli Bai 2,, Bingbing Zhu 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC12596306  PMID: 40067577

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), poses a serious threat to global health. Aseptic inflammation and pyroptosis of podocytes are crucial factors contributing to the pathogenesis and progression of DKD. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a novel class of antidiabetic agents widely used in clinical settings, may exert a protective effect on podocyte injury, although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study uses the streptozotocin (STZ) -induced DKD mouse model to further explore the mechanism by which SGLT2i protect podocytes. The results demonstrated that Canagliflozin (CANA) treatment significantly improved serum creatinine levels, 24-h urinary albumin excretion, and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in DKD mice. Additionally, CANA treatment attenuated glomerular and podocyte injury, reducing overall pathological damage. Mechanistically, CANA reduced the expression of key inflammatory markers in the renal cortex of DKD mice, including TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-1β, IL-18, and GSDMD. These findings suggest that CANA may be an effective therapeutic agent for DKD by inhibiting the TXNIP-NLRP3 inflammasome pathway and preventing podocyte pyroptosis.

Keywords: Canagliflozin, Diabetic kidney disease, Nucleotide binding oligomerization domain-like receptors 3, Inflammation

Introduction

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, is a leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD)[1, 2]. The escalating prevalence of DKD highlights its significant impact on global health and underscores the urgency of developing effective therapeutic strategies[3]. Currently, the standard care for DKD primarily focuses on managing risk factors, such as blood glucose and blood pressure[4]. Renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are a cornerstone of DKD treatment. The advent of novel therapeutics, such as sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors (GLP-1R), and novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), has expanded treatment options and improved outcomes for DKD patients[5].

The pathogenesis of DKD is intricate, with inflammation playing a critical role in both the initiation and progression of the condition[6, 7]. The Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like Receptor Protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, among the most thoroughly and deeply researched inflammasomes, has been implicated in a close association with DKD and podocyte injury[8, 9]. Podocytes, specialized cells within the kidney, are vital for maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier. They regulate the passage of large molecular proteins, stabilize the glomerular capillary structure, and preserve glomerular endothelial cell function[10]. However, pathological conditions can lead to podocyte damage, loss, and impaired regeneration, culminating in proteinuria and kidney damage[11].

The NLRP3 inflammasome, a multi-protein complex consisting of NLRP3, Apoptosis-Associated Spotted Like Protein with a CARD (ASC) and caspase-1[12], is closely associated with DKD and podocyte damage[13]. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in podocytes can exacerbate DKD podocytes dysfunction and glomerular injury[14]. Thioredoxin Interacting Protein (TXNIP), a protein that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, has been shown to initiate downstream signaling pathways[15]. It plays a role in cellular oxidative stress and inflammatory responses[16].

Consequently, exploring effective measures and pathways to protect podocyte damage by suppressing inflammation holds significant clinical importance for the prevention and treatment of DKD.

SGLTs, transmembrane proteins involved in glucose reabsorption, are differentially expressed in the intestinal and glomerular compartments. SGLT-1 is mainly expressed in the small bowel, whereas SGLT-2 is mainly expressed in the proximal part of the renal tubules[17]. SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently utilized as a novel class of hypoglycemic drugs in clinical practice[18, 19]. Numerous studies have indicated that it exerts a protective effect on the heart and kidneys[2022]. SGLT2i has been recommended as a first-line treatment for DKD by various authoritative guidelines, with Canagliflozin (CANA) being one of the approved SGLT2i medications[23]. The primary mechanism of action involves the blockade of the SGLT-2 transporter in the renal proximal tubule, which inhibits glucose reabsorption, promotes the excretion of urine glucose and sodium, and contributes to a reduction in blood glucose levels[24]. Beyond their renal tubular actions, SGLT2i have been shown to protect against podocyte injury, a critical aspect of DKD pathophysiology[25]. This protection is believed to be multifaceted, involving mechanisms such as maintaining podocyte integrity, inhibiting podocyte apoptosis, enhancing podocyte autophagy, ameliorating slit diaphragm dysfunction, restoring podocyte epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and preventing podocyte loss. Despite these findings, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying SGLT2i's effects remain unclear[26]. In our previous in vitro studies, we observed that podocytes express SGLT2 at baseline, albeit at low levels. Notably, exposure of podocytes to high glucose conditions results in a significant upregulation of SGLT2 expression. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that SGLT2i effectively reverses the high glucose-induced increase in SGLT2 and NLRP3 expression in podocytes[27]. Based on these findings, the present study was designed to explore the protective effects of SGLT2i on podocyte injury in a DKD mouse model, employing losartan as a reference control, and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Material and Methods

Drugs

Imported Canagliflozin (CANA) is marked by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a division of Johnson company, and losartan used in this experiment was purchased from Merck Sharp. Streptozotocin (STZ) was prepared by Sigma-Aldrich Company (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) and dissolved in the citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.5) for further use.

Animals

4-week-old male FVB mice weighting at 25–35 g were purchased from Jiangsu Jicui Co Ltd. All the work was carried out according to the approved guidelines. The experimental animals were housed in the Animal Experimentation Center of Shanghai Putuo District Hospital, and acclimatized in a clean environment at constant temperature for 2 weeks, subjected to a regular 12/12-h light/dark cycle, and fed with a standard diet. Diabetes was modelled by intraperitoneal injection of STZ at 50 mg/kg/day for 5 days after 4 weeks of high-fat feeding. One week later, successful DKD modelling was indicated by measurement of a random glucose ≥ 16.7 mmol/L. After 4 weeks of modelling the mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 7 per group): (1) Normal control mice receiving vehicle (Ctrl), (2) diabetic kidney disease mice receiving vehicle (DKD), (3) diabetic kidney disease mice receiving Canagliflozin at 5 mg/kg/day (CANA), (4) diabetic kidney disease mice receiving losartan at 15.2 mg/kg/day (losartan), (5) diabetic kidney disease mice receiving Canagliflozin at 5 mg/kg/day and losartan at 15.2 mg/kg/day (CANA + losartan). Canagliflozin and losartan suspended in 0.5% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose were used as delivery vehicles and administered to mice by oral gavage for 8 weeks.

Measurement of Metabolic Parameters

Mouse was individually placed in a metabolic cage to collect 24 h urine. Urinary albumin was detected using a double antibody sandwich method. Anti-mouse urinary albumin antibody (Bethyl Laboratory, A90-134A) was encapsulated on the assay plate overnight, the next day add the sample/standard to bind with the antibody. Then add biotin-labelled detection antibody HRP (Bethyl Laboratory, A90-134P) enzyme conjugate and chromogenic substrate TMB (Bethyl Laboratory, lot 230,501) in turn. When the liquid shows blue, immediately add the Stop solution (Beyotime, P0215) to the reaction system. Finally measure the OD value at the 450 nm. Urinary creatinine was tested with a Creatinine (urinary) Colorimetric Assay Kit, Item No. 500701, purchased from Cayman chemical. Serum creatinine was measured using a creatinine (CRE) test kit purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Item No. C011-2–1).

Renal Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Slices were first antigenically repaired using 50 × EDTA (Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd, E673003-0250) and then incubated sequentially at room temperature with hydrogen oxide blocks and rapid blocking solution. And then the primary antibody dilution is added and left overnight at 4℃. After incubation with biotinylated secondary (Vector Laboratories), the sections were incubated with VECTA-STAIN ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories). Next, the sections were color developed using the DAB Substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, ZLI-9018). Finally, sections were streaked using hematoxylin for 15 s. Observe the image with a bio-optical microscope at × 400 magnification. Immunostaining including Nephrin (Abcam, Ab216341, 1:500), WT-1 (Abcam, Ab89901, 1:200), TXNIP (Proteintech, 18,243–1-AP, 1:50) and NLRP3 (Proteintech, 19,771–1-AP, 1:50).

Immunofluorescence

Kidney tissues were dehydrated with 12% sucrose for 2 days, then embedded in optimum cutting temperature compound (OCT) and snap-frozen at −80℃. 4-μm sections were removed and rewarmed for 5 min, blocked with 10% normal goat serum to avoid nonspecific binding at room temperature for 1 h. Samples were incubated with primary antibody against NLRP3 (Proteintech, 19,771–1-AP, 1:50), Synaptopodin (Proteintech, 67,339–1-lg, 1:200), Nephrin (Abcam, Ab216341, 1:50) and WT-1 (Abcam, Ab89901, 1:50) at 4℃ overnight. Then, the sections were washed and treated with fluorescent-dye conjugated secondary antibodies including Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated AffiniPure™ Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, 115–545-003, 1:200), Cy™3-conjugated AffiniPure™ Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, 111–165-003, 1:200) and Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488) (Abcam, 150,077, 1:200) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, the samples were counterstained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), while to minimize background fluorescence, anti-fluorescence quenching blockers (Beyotime, P0126) were applied and fixed with coverslips. Finally, the slides were visualized using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM) to obtain detailed fluorescence images.

Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) Staining

Follow the standard steps of PAS reagent kit (Baso Diagnostics Inc, BA4080B). Paraffin sections of 4 μm thickness were cut and oxidized in periodate solution for 10 min, then stained with Schiff’s reagent for 10 min. Finally, sections were subjected to hematoxylin staining of the nuclei for 15 s and slides were covered with neutral gum fixation.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

After removing the mouse kidney, carefully slice the renal cortex into thin slices of approximately 2 mm3. These slices were quickly soaked in 2.5% glutaraldehyde electron microscopy solution and assisted by the Electron Microscopy Center of Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University.

Western Blot Analysis

Grind the renal cortex using RIPA lysis (Beyotime, P0013B) buffer containing 1 mM PMSF (Beyotime, ST505) and 1 × protease (Beyotime, P1005) and phosphatase inhibitor (Beyotime, P1045) at a concentration of 20 μl/mg for 1 min. The total protein is obtained from the supernatant after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The total protein concentration of tissue lysates was determined using the BCA kit (Beyotime, P0009). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot following standard procedures. Blocking in 5% BSA for 1 h, then incubate overnight with specific primary antibody at 4 ℃: NLRP3 (ApidoGen, AG-20B-0014, 1:1000), IL-1β (Proteintech, 16,806–1-AP, 1:500), Caspase-1 (Proteintech, 22,915–1-AP, 1:2000), GSDMD (Proteintech, 20,770–1-AP, 1:2000), ASC (Proteintech, 10,500–1-AP, 1:2500), β-ACTIN (Abcam, Ab6276, 1:10,000). After washing the membrane with TBST, the goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Incubate with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) and exposure image with quantitative LAS 500. Densitometric quantitation was determined by Image J. β-ACTIN was used as an internal control.

Quantitative Real-time PCR

Extraction of total RNA from mouse renal cortex, RNA reverse transcription synthesis of first complementary strand DNA (cDNA), and PCR reaction system were all performed using reagent kits purchased from Tiangen Biochemical Technology (Beijing) Co, Ltd. The primer sequence design and synthesis were carried out by Biotechnology (Shanghai) Co, Ltd. Calculate the relative expression levels of each target gene mRNA using the 2−ΔΔCT method and normalize them according to β-ACTIN. Determination of the expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18 in the renal cortex (Table 1).

Table 1.

Primers Used for Q-PCR

Gene name Sequence (5’−3’)
IL-1β forward GAAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG
IL-1β reverse TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG
IL-18 forward GTGAACCCCAGACCAGACTG
IL-18 reverse CCTGGAACACGTTTCTGAAAGA
Beta-Actin forward GAAGTGTGACGTGGACATCC
Beta-Actin reverse CCGATCCACACGGAGTACTT

Statistics Analysis

Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0. The experimental results are expressed as mean ± standard error means (SEMs). One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc analysis was employed to determine the statistical significance among groups. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

CANA Reduces Serum Creatinine, Urinary Albumin and UACR levels in DKD Mice

Kidney tissue and serum were collected after 8 weeks of treatment for each group (Fig. 1a). To assess the renal function level of mice, ELISA was employed to measure serum creatinine and 24-h urinary albumin content, and UACR was calculated accordingly. The results indicated that serum creatinine levels in the model group mice were significantly elevated compared to the Ctrl group (P < 0.01). Following treatment with CANA and losartan, serum creatinine levels in the treated mice were significantly restored relative to those in the DKD group (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1b). Similarly, the 24-h urinary albumin content and UACR in the model mice increased significantly 4 weeks after STZ injection, affirming the successful establishment of the DKD model (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1c, d). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with losartan, canagliflozin, or a combination of both, the 24-h urinary albumin content and UACR ratio in the treated mice were significantly decreased compared to the DKD group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1c, d). These findings suggest that CANA ameliorates renal injury in DKD mice and exhibits a protective effect on renal function that is comparable to losartan.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

CANA reduces serum creatinine and urinary albumin levels in DKD mice. (a) Schematic depicting the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes paradigm in FVB mice. After diabetes induction, mice were followed for 12 weeks. (b) serum creatinine, (c) 24-h proteinuria and (d) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, versus DKD by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

CANA Reduces the Pathological Damage of Glomeruli and Podocytes in DKD Mice

To observe the impact of CANA on the renal pathological injury in the DKD model mice, paraffin sections of mouse kidney tissues were subjected to Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. The results indicated that compared to the Ctrl group, the glomerular mesangial area was expanded, the mesangial matrix proliferation was augmented, and the glycogen deposition was increased in the DKD mice (P < 0.01). Following treatment with CANA, the aforementioned pathological injuries were ameliorated, suggesting that CANA can reduce the pathological injury of glomeruli (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2a, c). To further investigate the effect of CANA on the structure of podocytes, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to observe the changes in foot processes (Fig. 2b). The results revealed that DKD mice exhibited widened and fused podocytes, disappearance of foot processes, reduced density and quantity of podocytes, and thickened basement membranes. After CANA treatment, these alterations were significantly mitigated. These findings demonstrate that CANA can alleviate the pathological injury of podocytes and help maintain their structural stability.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

CANA attenuates renal pathological damage in DKD mice. (a) PAS staining. (b) SEM images. (c) Relative glomerular mesangial area. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, versus DKD by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

CANA Restores Glomerular Function and Podocyte Number in DKD Mice

Nephrin, a crucial structural molecule located on the glomerular podocyte membrane and a vital component of the podocyte slit diaphragm, plays a key role in the composition of the glomerular filtration barrier[28]. In renal disease research, Wilms tumor-1 (WT-1) is widely recognized as a podocyte-specific marker and is frequently used for podocyte counting[29, 30]. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining revealed that, in comparison to the Ctrl group, the expression of Nephrin and WT-1 in the glomeruli of DKD mice was significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Conversely, treatment with CANA, losartan, or a combination of both significantly up-regulated the expression of Nephrin and WT-1 in the glomeruli of DKD mice (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3a-h). In particular, upregulation was more pronounced in the group using CANA or the combination than in the group using losartan alone, but was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that CANA restores the number and function of podocytes within the glomeruli.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

CANA restored the glomerular function and the number of glomerular podocytes in DKD mice. (a) Nephrin and (b) WT-1 stained by immunohistochemistry. (c) Nephrin positive area of each glomerulus and (d) WT-1 count per glomerulus in immunohistochemical staining. (e) WT-1 and (f) Nephrin stained by immunofluorescence. (g) WT-1 count per glomerulus and (h) Nephrin positive area of each glomerulus in immunofluorescence staining. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus DKD; NS, nonsignificant versus CANA + losartan by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

CANA Reduces TXNIP Expression in the Glomeruli of DKD Mice

To further elucidate the pathway of NLRP3 activation, we examined TXNIP expression. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that, in comparison to the Ctrl group, there was a significant increase in TXNIP expression within the glomeruli of DKD mice. Moreover, TXNIP expression was significantly reduced following CANA treatment (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

CANA reduces the expression levels of TXNIP. TXNIP stained by immunohistochemistry and TXNIP positive area of each glomerulus. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus DKD by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

CANA reduces NLRP3 Expression in Podocytes of DKD Mice

Western blot analysis revealed that, in comparison to the Ctrl group, NLRP3 expression was up-regulated in the renal cortex of DKD mice (P < 0.01). Additionally, treatment with CANA led to a significant decrease in NLRP3 expression (P < 0.05), and the combined treatment group of CANA and losartan was more effective than treatment with CANA alone (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5a-b). Immunohistochemical staining results demonstrated a significant increase in NLRP3 expression in the glomeruli of DKD mice compared to Ctrl mice and a reduction in NLRP3 expression in the CANA group relative to the DKD group (Fig. 5c-d). Immunofluorescence imaging corroborated these findings, showing co-expression of NLRP3 and Synaptopodin in glomeruli. Compared to Ctrl mice, DKD mice showed high levels of NLRP3 expression and low levels of Synaptopodin in the glomeruli. After treatment with CANA, the expression of NLRP3 in the glomeruli was significantly downregulated, while the expression of Synaptopodin was markedly restored (Fig. 5e-g).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

CANA reduces the expression level of NLRP3. (a-b) Western bolt analysis of renal cortical NLRP3 expression levels. (c) Immunohistochemical staining of the glomerular NLRP3 positive area (d) NLRP3 stained by immunohistochemistry. (eg) Immunofluorescence staining of NLRP3 and Synaptopodin. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus DKD; &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01, NS, nonsignificant versus CANA + losartan by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

CANA Reduces the Protein Expression of the ASC-Caspase 1/IL-1β/GSDMD Pathway in DKD Mice

To verify the effect of CANA on inflammatory expression in DKD mice, the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18 were measured by Q-PCR. The results indicated that the mRNA expression levels of both IL-1β and IL-18 were significantly elevated in the DKD group compared to the Ctrl group (P < 0.05). Additionally, treatment with CANA resulted in a notable decrease in the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6a-b). Western blot analysis was then used to examine the expression levels of NLRP3 downstream proteins. The results revealed that IL-1β, ASC, Caspase-1, and GSDMD protein levels were significantly reduced in the CANA-treated mice compared to the DKD group (Fig. 6c-g).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

CANA reduces the expression levels of ASC, Caspase-1, IL-1β and GSDMD. (a) IL-1β and (b) IL-18 mRNA relative expression (c-g) Western blot analysis of renal cortical ASC, Caspase-1, IL-1β and GSDMD expression levels. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus Ctrl; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus DKD; &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01 versus CANA + losartan by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post doc analysis

Discussion

Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) represents a prevalent microvascular complication associated with diabetes mellitus. The classic clinical hallmarks include persistent proteinuria, a gradual decline in renal function, and characteristic morphological alterations of the glomeruli. However, recent observations have highlighted that the clinical manifestations and progression of DKD can vary significantly[31]. The histopathological hallmarks of DKD commonly include glomerular basement membrane thickening, mesangial proliferation, endothelial changes and podocyte injury[32]. The structural and functional derangements of the glomeruli are intricately linked to podocyte injury and loss[33]. Podocytes are unique, highly specialized kidney cells with crucial roles. They maintain the glomerular basement membrane’s integrity and regulate the filtration of large proteins through the charge-selective barrier. They also preserve the structural stability of glomerular capillaries and balance the hydrostatic pressure within the glomerulus. Furthermore, podocytes support the endothelial cells function and contribute to the synthesis and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor[34]. In pathological conditions, damage, detachment and lack of regeneration of podocytes can compromise the glomerular filtration barrier, resulting in increased proteinuria and renal impairment.[35].

SGLT2, a high-capacity, low-affinity cotransporter, is localized to the S1 and S2 segments of the proximal renal tubules[36]. SGLT2i represents a novel class of oral hypoglycemic agents that achieve their therapeutic effect by facilitating the excretion of glucose in urine independent of insulin [37]. Furthermore, SGLT2i has been demonstrated to facilitate the excretion of sodium, counteract the tubulo-glomerular feedback mechanism, and decrease intraglomerular pressure, collectively contributing to the preservation of renal function[38]. Moreover, SGLT2i has been observed to have additional benefits, including the reduction of blood pressure, body fat mass, and metabolic disorders, in addition to demonstrating anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, and providing comprehensive cardiovascular and renal protection[3942].

SGLT-2 s is predominantly expressed in the proximal renal tubules; however, recent research has indicated that SGLT2i also exerts a protective effect on podocytes [43]. SGLT2i exerts reno-protective effects through various mechanisms, including the preservation of podocyte integrity, suppression of podocyte apoptosis, augmentation of podocyte autophagy, and prevention of podocyte loss[44]. In a study by Zhao XY et al., it was observed that the expression level of SGLT2 was elevated and co-localization with Synaptopodin was reduced in kidney biopsy samples from lupus mice. Treatment with SGLT2i resulted in increased expression of Nephrin and podocin in mice, significantly ameliorating podocyte injury and suggesting a protective effect of SGLT2i on podocytes[45]. Guo R et al. discovered that SGLT2i can down-regulate the IGF1R/PI3K signaling pathway to inhibit podocyte epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in DKD podocytes[46]. Sun J et al. found that SGLT2i targets ABCA1 signaling pathway to regulate podocyte cholesterol accumulation and alleviate podocyte injury[47]. Ge M et al. not only demonstrated similar expression levels of SGLT2 protein in human and mouse podocytes to those in tubular cells but also observed that SGLT2i mitigates podocyte lipid droplet accumulation and apoptosis in Alport syndrome[25].

In this study, the administration of CANA significantly reduced serum creatinine levels, 24-h urinary albumin, and the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in mice. Immunohistochemical staining, immunofluorescence staining, PAS pathological staining and electron microscopy observation revealed a restoration of glomerular and podocyte architecture. These findings were comparable to those observed with losartan treatment. At the same time, we observed a better therapeutic effect when CANA and losartan were combined than CANA or losartan alone, but the results were not statistically significant. The results from our study suggest that CANA exerts significant anti-proteinuria effects and delays the progression of renal dysfunction in the DKD mouse model. This is consistent with the improvement of glomerular lesions and the reversal of podocyte injury.

The past few years have witnessed a surge in research examining the potential of SGLT2i to improve podocyte injury. However, reports on the relationship between SGLT2i and renal podocyte sterile inflammation are scarce[48]. Clinical studies have shown that SGLT2i can exert an anti-inflammatory effect by reducing serum inflammatory factors such as IL-1β in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy[49]. Basic research has also revealed that SGLT2i exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, including the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome expression and Il-1β and IL-18 secretion in human aortic smooth muscle cells[50], and reduction of TNF-α and IL-1 levels in cardiomyocytes under high glucose conditions; Inhibition of AMPK signaling pathway in liver cells reduces the expression of IL-17 and IL-23[51], decrease the levels of IL-6 and IL-1β in an LPS-induced lung injury model[52], and inhibit the activation of NLRP3/ASC inflammasome in cardiac fibroblasts of DKD[53]. Furthermore, SGLT2i has been found to inhibit the activation of AMPK/Akt in the renal cortex of BTBR ob/ob mice with type 2 diabetes[54], decrease the mRNA production of TNF-α/PEDF/PTX-3 in the kidney of diabetic rats[55], and other effects. Our previous in vitro study demonstrated that high glucose can induce the up-regulation of NLRP3 expression in human podocytes, and SGLT2i can reverse this effect[27]. Therefore, it is speculated that SGLT2 inhibitors may regulate inflammatory signaling pathways in podocytes by inhibiting the NLRP3 pathway, thereby protecting podocyte function.

Inflammatory injury is a key factor in the progression of podocyte injury in DKD[56]. There has been a significant growth in the scientific in DKD[57]. Recent research has indicated that the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome can elicit an inflammatory response in renal podocytes, leading to renal failure. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a complex multi-protein assembly consisting of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1. The activation of NLRP3 primarily involves three key mechanisms[58]: (1) the activation and regulation of ions, such as potassium ion efflux, sodium ion efflux and chloride ion efflux; (2) the activation and regulation of organelles, including mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, centrosomes, Golgi and endosomes, and lysosomes; (3) the activation and regulation of metabolism, including glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and fatty acid metabolism. While the upstream events initiating NLRP3 activation remain unclear, studies have shown that TXNIP expression is elevated in a hyperglycemic environment and serves as a pivotal signaling node linking ER stress with inflammation[59]. TXNIP can directly engage with NLRP3 through a REDOX-dependent interaction to facilitate IL-1β mRNA transcription and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome[15, 60]. TXNIP plays a significant role in cellular metabolism by activating inflammatory signaling via the NLRP3 pathway. In DKD, elevated glucose levels contribute to renal hypoxia and oxidative stress, leading to increased TXNIP and NLRP3 expression[61]. TXNIP interacts with the pyrin domain of NLRP3 and ASC, enabling the CAR domain of ASC to recruit and engage pro-caspase-1, thus promoting its cleavage and activation. Cleaved caspase-1 then processes pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their mature forms, which are subsequently secreted into the cytoplasm, initiating the inflammatory response. Additionally, active caspase-1 cleaves GSDMD at the interface between its N- and C-terminal domains, generating an N-terminal fragment that forms membrane pores and triggers pyroptosis[62]. Existing research has also shown that kidney injury is significantly exacerbated when NLRP3 gap-specific mutants are specifically expressed in podocytes, and NLRP3-deficient hyperglycemic mice exhibit protective effects against DKD[8]. These findings suggest that targeting NLRP3 and suppressing sterile inflammation represent potential therapeutic strategies for alleviating podocyte injury in DKD.

In our current study, we observed an increase in TXNIP and NLRP3 expression in the renal cortex of DKD mice. Notably, CANA treatment significantly attenuated TXNIP and NLRP3 expression in comparison to DKD mice. Concurrently, we found elevated levels of downstream signaling pathway-related proteins, including Caspase-1, GSDMD, and ASC, in the renal cortex of DKD mice. The administration of CANA resulted in a significant reduction in their expression levels. Based on these findings, we propose that SGLT2i may inhibit the production of TXNIP and the activity of NLRP3, thereby mitigating the inflammatory response of DKD podocytes, preventing podocyte pyroptosis, and safeguarding the functionality of DKD glomeruli and podocytes (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

CANA attenuates podocyte inflammation and pyroptosis by inhibiting the TXNIP/NLRP3 pathway

In this study, losartan served as positive controls for DKD treatment. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), collectively known as RAAS inhibitors, have been the cornerstone of DKD treatment for over two decades and are widely recommended as first-line antihypertensive medications for diabetic patients[63]. Losartan has been demonstrated to exert a protective effect on DKD podocytes, in addition to an inhibitory effect on inflammatory pathways. Consequently, it is frequently utilized as a positive control in mechanistic studies of drug treatment for DKD in mice[64, 65]. In recent years, numerous clinical trials have underscored the beneficial effects of SGLT2i on the hearts and kidneys of DKD patients, identifying new potential therapeutic targets for SGLT2i and fostering a comprehensive revision of DKD treatment guidelines. However, the precise mechanism of action of SGLT2i remains the subject of ongoing investigation, particularly with regard to its protective effects and mechanisms on podocytes, which are less well understood at present. Presently, SGLT2i and RAAS inhibitors are recognized as first-line basic medications for DKD management, effectively delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in affected individuals. several potential renal protection mechanisms of RAAS blockers and SGLT2i have been proposed over the past few years[38, 66, 67]. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these effects remain unknown. Some scholars have employed single-cell sequencing to demonstrate that there is a superimposed rather than a synergistic effect between the two drugs, ARBs and SGLT2i. ARBs exhibit more pronounced anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in the proximal renal tubular cells of db/db mouse models, whereas SGLT2i seems to impact more significantly on mitochondrial function in proximal tubular (PT) cells[68]. However, the specific mechanisms through which this process occurs within podocytes remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we found that SGLT2i, like ARBs, exerted a discernible protective effect on podocytes inflammatory injury in a murine model of DKD. Notably, SGLT2i demonstrated a remarkable capacity to impede the expression of TXNIP, NLRP3 and their downstream signaling pathway proteins in DKD mice. Of particular note was the observation that combined treatment group of SGLT2i and ARBs exhibited a more pronounced inhibition of NLRP3 expression compared to SGLT2i alone. Furthermore, the combination of the two drugs exhibited a superior effect in the down-regulating of the mRNA expression levels of IL-18 as well as the expression levels of ASC protein and GSDMD protein, in comparison with SGLT2i or ARBs administered individually. This finding lends further support to the hypothesis that the protective effect of SGLT2i on the pyroptosis of DKD podocytes was also demonstrated. The combination of SGLT2i and ARBs was marginally more efficacious than ARBs alone in protecting against renal function and podocyte injury (as reflected by serum creatinine, Nephrin, and WT-1 protein levels). However, these results did not reach statistical significance. This observation may also represent a limitation of our study, as the animal model of DKD may not fully capture the complexities of human DKD, the sample size is still limited, and expanding sample sizes will be essential to further minimize inter-animal variability. Furthermore, additional research is needed to elucidate the potential renal protection mechanisms of RAS blockers and SGLT2i.

In summary, our findings indicate that canagliflozin protects podocytes from pyroptosis induced by GSDMD activation in DKD by inhibiting the NLRP3/ASC/Caspase-1 signaling pathway. This inhibition significantly reduces the production and activity of downstream inflammatory factors such as IL-1β and IL-18, thereby modulating their translation and regulating the inflammatory response. This approach not only preserves podocyte integrity but also delays the progression of DKD. The potential link between NLRP3 activation and increased TXNIP levels warrants further exploration, as the etiology of DKD is multifaceted and requires extensive research to fully understand the specific regulatory mechanisms involved.

Author Contributions

B. Z, T.B and H. W contributed to the conceptualization and theoretical framework of the study and were also involved in the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. S. L, J.W, and Y. C involved in the data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. Y. C, Y. W, N. X, and X. Y participated in the experimental work and data analysis. Y. S, J. F, Q. X and X. Y were responsible for the statistical analysis. L. W, J. H and Y. C provided resources and technical support throughout the research. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Clinical specialty of Shanghai Putuo District Health System project(2021tszk02), Key Medical Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (ZK2019A12), Putuo District of shanghai Science and Technology Commission Research Project (ptkwws202311), and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission(2024QN080).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

The Animal Ethics Committee for Animal Research, Putuo District Center Hospital, Shanghai (Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine) (DWEC-A-202212001) approved the Animal experiments.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Siyu Li, Jie Wang and Ying Chen contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Tianli Bai, Email: 348875870@163.com.

Bingbing Zhu, Email: bingbingzhu630@sina.cn.

References

  • 1.Umanath, K., and J.B. Lewis. 2018. Update on Diabetic Nephropathy: Core Curriculum 2018. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 71 (6): 884–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alicic, R.Z., M.T. Rooney, and K.R. Tuttle. 2017. Diabetic Kidney Disease: Challenges, Progress, and Possibilities. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 12 (12): 2032–2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whiting, D.R., et al. 2011. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 94 (3): 311–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomas, M.C., et al. 2015. Diabetic kidney disease. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 1: 15018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brosius, F.C., et al. 2021. Transforming the care of patients with diabetic kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 16 (10): 1590–1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rayego-Mateos, S., et al. 2023. Targeting inflammation to treat diabetic kidney disease: The road to 2030. Kidney International 103 (2): 282–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rayego-Mateos, S., et al. 2020. Pathogenic pathways and therapeutic approaches targeting inflammation in diabetic nephropathy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (11): 3798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shahzad, K., et al. 2022. Podocyte-specific Nlrp3 inflammasome activation promotes diabetic kidney disease. Kidney International 102 (4): 766–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao, W., et al. 2022. Metabolic dysfunction in the regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome activation: a potential target for diabetic nephropathy. Journal of Diabetes Research 2022: 2193768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li, X., et al. 2023. Podocyte injury of diabetic nephropathy: Novel mechanism discovery and therapeutic prospects. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 168: 115670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reidy, K., et al. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic kidney disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 124 (6): 2333–2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kodi, T., et al. 2024. New Insights on NLRP3 Inflammasome: Mechanisms of Activation, Inhibition, and Epigenetic Regulation. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology 19 (1): 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wan, J., et al. 2022. NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in diabetic nephropathy. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13: 998574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu, J., et al. 2021. The key role of NLRP3 and STING in APOL1-associated podocytopathy. Journal of Clinical Investigation 131(20): e136329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Zhou, R., et al. 2010. Thioredoxin-interacting protein links oxidative stress to inflammasome activation. Nature Immunology 11 (2): 136–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Choi, E.H., and S.J. Park. 2023. TXNIP: A key protein in the cellular stress response pathway and a potential therapeutic target. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 55 (7): 1348–1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Nicola, L., et al. 2014. Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and prevention of diabetic nephropathy: Targeting the renal tubule in diabetes. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 64 (1): 16–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Norman, M., and D.A. Molony. 2023. KDIGO provided recommendations on SGLT2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal MRAs in patients with diabetes and CKD. Annals of Internal Medicine 176 (5): JC50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Boer, I.H., et al. 2022. Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney International 102 (5): 974–989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xie, Y., et al. 2023. Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure and Their Clinical Value. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 81 (1): 4–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yau, K., et al. 2022. Prescribing SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With CKD: Expanding Indications and Practical Considerations. Kidney Int Rep 7 (7): 1463–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saisho, Y. 2020. SGLT2 Inhibitors: the Star in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes? Diseases 8 (2): 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 2024. 9 Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 47 (Suppl 1): S158–S178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hu, J., et al. 2024. SGLT-2 inhibitors as novel treatments of multiple organ fibrosis. Heliyon 10 (8): e29486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ge, M., et al. 2023. Empagliflozin reduces podocyte lipotoxicity in experimental Alport syndrome. Elife 12: e83353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen, X., et al. 2022. Signaling pathways of podocyte injury in diabetic kidney disease and the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Cells 11 (23): 3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yanlu, C., et al. 2024. Canagliflozin attenuates human podocyte injury through inhibiting reactive oxygen species/NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 signaling pathway. Chinese Journal of Nephrology. 40 (01): 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mesfine, B.B., et al. 2023. Urinary nephrin—a potential marker of early glomerular injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nephrology 37 (1): 39–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou, H., et al. 2013. Urinary exosomal Wilms’ tumor-1 as a potential biomarker for podocyte injury. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 305 (4): F553–F559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sanden, S.K., et al. 2003. Evaluation of a thick and thin section method for estimation of podocyte number, glomerular volume, and glomerular volume per podocyte in rat kidney with Wilms’ tumor-1 protein used as a podocyte nuclear marker. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 14 (10): 2484–2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Petrazzuolo, A., et al. 2023. Broadening horizons in mechanisms, management, and treatment of diabetic kidney disease. Pharmacological Research 190: 106710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Comai, G., et al. 2019. Histological Evidence of Diabetic Kidney Disease Precede Clinical Diagnosis. American Journal of Nephrology 50 (1): 29–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barutta, F., S. Bellini, and G. Gruden. 2022. Mechanisms of podocyte injury and implications for diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Science (London, England) 136 (7): 493–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Greka, A., and P. Mundel. 2012. Cell biology and pathology of podocytes. Annual Review of Physiology 74: 299–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nagata, M. 2016. Podocyte injury and its consequences. Kidney International 89 (6): 1221–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferrannini, E., and A. Solini. 2012. SGLT2 inhibition in diabetes mellitus: Rationale and clinical prospects. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology 8 (8): 495–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Poulsen, S.B., R.A. Fenton, and T. Rieg. 2015. Sodium-glucose cotransport. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 24 (5): 463–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dharia, A., et al. 2023. SGLT2 Inhibitors: The Sweet Success for Kidneys. Annual Review of Medicine 74: 369–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Preda, A., et al. 2024. SGLT2 inhibitors: From glucose-lowering to cardiovascular benefits. Cardiovascular Research 120 (5): 443–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen, S., et al. 2022. Direct cardiac effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. Cardiovascular Diabetology 21 (1): 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zelniker, T.A., and E. Braunwald. 2020. Mechanisms of Cardiorenal Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 75 (4): 422–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neuen, B.L., et al. 2024. Estimated Lifetime Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Mortality Benefits of Combination Treatment With SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and Nonsteroidal MRA Compared With Conventional Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Albuminuria. Circulation 149 (6): 450–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Durcan, E., et al. 2022. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on patients with diabetic kidney disease: A preliminary study on the basis of podocyturia. Journal of Diabetes 14 (4): 236–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.DeFronzo, R.A., W.B. Reeves, and A.S. Awad. 2021. Pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease: Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors. Nature Reviews. Nephrology 17 (5): 319–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao, X.Y., et al. 2023. SGLT2 inhibitors alleviated podocyte damage in lupus nephritis by decreasing inflammation and enhancing autophagy. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 82 (10): 1328–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guo, R., et al. 2022. SGLT2 inhibitors suppress epithelial-mesenchymal transition in podocytes under diabetic conditions via downregulating the IGF1R/PI3K pathway. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13: 897167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sun, J., et al. 2024. Dapagliflozin improves podocytes injury in diabetic nephropathy via regulating cholesterol balance through KLF5 targeting the ABCA1 signalling pathway. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome 16 (1): 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lv, C., et al. 2023. Triptolide protects against podocyte injury in diabetic nephropathy by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Renal Failure 45 (1): 2165103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang, D.D., et al. 2024. Dapagliflozin reduces systemic inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes without known heart failure. Cardiovascular Diabetology 23 (1): 197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sukhanov, S., et al. 2021. The SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin attenuates interleukin-17A-induced human aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration by targeting TRAF3IP2/ROS/NLRP3/Caspase-1-dependent IL-1beta and IL-18 secretion. Cellular Signalling 77: 109825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Meng, Z., et al. 2021. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin negatively regulates IL-17/IL-23 axis-mediated inflammatory responses in T2DM with NAFLD via the AMPK/mTOR/autophagy pathway. International Immunopharmacology 94: 107492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee, N., et al. 2021. Anti-inflammatory Effects of Empagliflozin and Gemigliptin on LPS-Stimulated Macrophage via the IKK/NF-kappaB, MKK7/JNK, and JAK2/STAT1 Signalling Pathways. Journal of Immunology Research 2021: 9944880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ye, Y., et al. 2017. SGLT-2 Inhibition with dapagliflozin reduces the activation of the Nlrp3/ASC inflammasome and attenuates the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice with type 2 diabetes. Further Augmentation of the Effects with Saxagliptin, a DPP4 Inhibitor. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 31 (2): 119–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Birnbaum, Y., et al. 2022. Ticagrelor and Dapagliflozin Have Additive Effects in Ameliorating Diabetic Nephropathy in Mice with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 36 (5): 829–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Elkazzaz, S.K., et al. 2021. Role of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors dapagliflozin on diabetic nephropathy in rats; Inflammation, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Life Sciences 280: 119018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wada, J., and H. Makino. 2013. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Science (London, England) 124 (3): 139–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shi, L., et al. 2023. The intellectual base and global trends in inflammation of diabetic kidney disease: A bibliometric analysis. Renal Failure 45 (2): 2270061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xu, J., and G. Nunez. 2023. The NLRP3 inflammasome: Activation and regulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 48 (4): 331–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gu, C., et al. 2019. Role of the thioredoxin interacting protein in diabetic nephropathy and the mechanism of regulating NOD-like receptor protein 3 inflammatory corpuscle. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 43 (6): 2440–2450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Oslowski, C.M., et al. 2012. Thioredoxin-interacting protein mediates ER stress-induced beta cell death through initiation of the inflammasome. Cell Metabolism 16 (2): 265–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang, X., et al. 2022. Schisandrin A from Schisandra chinensis Attenuates Ferroptosis and NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Pyroptosis in Diabetic Nephropathy through Mitochondrial Damage by AdipoR1 Ubiquitination. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2022: 5411462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Heo, M.J., et al. 2019. Alcohol dysregulates miR-148a in hepatocytes through FoxO1, facilitating pyroptosis via TXNIP overexpression. Gut 68 (4): 708–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tuttle, K.R., et al. 2014. Diabetic kidney disease: A report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care 37 (10): 2864–2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ma, Q., et al. 2022. A novel fusion protein consisting of anti-ANGPTL3 antibody and interleukin-22 ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in mice. Frontiers in Immunology 13: 1011442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu, Y., et al. 2013. Combined losartan and nitro-oleic acid remarkably improves diabetic nephropathy in mice. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology 305 (11): F1555–F1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen, X., et al. 2023. Reno- and cardioprotective molecular mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycemic control: From bedside to bench. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 325 (3): C661–C681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kim, S.R., et al. 2020. SGLT2 inhibition modulates NLRP3 inflammasome activity via ketones and insulin in diabetes with cardiovascular disease. Nature Communications 11 (1): 2127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wu, J., et al. 2022. Kidney single-cell transcriptome profile reveals distinct response of proximal tubule cells to SGLT2i and ARB treatment in diabetic mice. Molecular Therapy 30 (4): 1741–1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES