Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2025 Nov 7;104(45):e45939. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000045939

Length of hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty among obese patients: A single-center study

Ahmed Hassan Kamal a,*, Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari b, Faisal Musafiq Alruwaili b, Abdulmohsen Nayef Alenzi b, Saif Farhan Alruwaili b, Abdulelah Essam Saba b, Abdulaziz Saeed Almutlaq c, Sultan Ayed Alanazi b, Khalid Omar Alsharari b
PMCID: PMC12599721  PMID: 41204469

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) accounts for almost 80% of the worldwide burden of OA, with a pooled global prevalence of 22.9% (95% CI, 19.8–26.1%) in individuals aged 40 years and older. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly effective procedure for treating knee OA. The length of stay (LOS) after TKA is an important measure of care quality, and predicting it can assist in optimizing patient recovery and healthcare strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the LOS and re-admission rates following TKA at Prince Metaab Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Saudi Arabia. This retrospective, observational, analytical study included 194 patients who underwent primary TKA at Prince Metaab Bin Abdulaziz Hospital from January 2019 to June 2024. Data were collected from electronic health records and included demographics, LOS, mobility, blood transfusions, re-admissions, ASA grade, and postoperative complications. A negative binomial regression model was used to identify the factors associated with LOS. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27, with a P-value of < .05 considered significant. The median age of the patients was 63 years. Most patients were females (77%), while 72% and 26% were obese and overweight, respectively, and 15% were smokers. The median LOS was 4 days, and 47.4% of the patients stayed for 4–6 days. Re-admission occurred in 6.7% of cases, and the most common reasons being infection, joint pain, and knee stiffness. Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of the patients. A stepwise negative binomial regression model revealed that postoperative mobility (Exp(B) = 0.578, P < .001) was associated with shorter LOS, and ASA grade 2 patients were more likely to have a shorter LOS than ASA grade 3 patients (Exp(B) = 0. 749, P = .002). Dyslipidemia (Exp(B) = 1.522, P < .001) and smoking history (Exp(B) = 1.407, P < .001) were associated with a longer LOS. This study identified postoperative mobility, dyslipidemia, ASA grade, and smoking history as factors influencing the LOS after TKA. Improving early mobilization and managing comorbidities, such as dyslipidemia and smoking, may reduce LOS, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs.

Keywords: knee osteoarthritis, length of stay, Middle East, re-admission to Saudi Arabia, total knee arthroplasty


Key points.

  • Factors influencing length of hospital stay following TKR: Length of stay (LOS) is affected by factors such as with mobility after the operation, smoking, prevalent dyslipidemia and the ASA score.

  • Targeting Modifiable Risks: Less time of stay may be achieved by appropriate smoking cessation intervention in combination with encouraging early mobilization of patients.

  • Perioperative Management: Comorbidities are most likely to be present in patients with high ASA grades; therefore better management of these conditions is key to faster recovery and enhanced postoperative care.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread chronic musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects patients and healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to considerable social and economic challenges.[1] Knee OA, which accounts for nearly 80% of the global OA burden, is strongly associated with obesity and aging.[2] The pooled global prevalence of knee OA was 16.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.3–17.8%) among individuals aged 15 years and above, rising to 22.9% (95% CI, 19.8–26.1%) for those aged 40 and over.[3] In Saudi Arabia, knee OA ranges from 13% to 41%, with an average prevalence of 67.8% reported among individuals 40 years of age or above (16.2–71.4%).[4]

Knee replacement surgery or arthroplasty was first performed in 1968. Since then, advances in materials and surgical techniques have markedly improved its efficacy. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently one of the most successful interventions for knee OA,[5] offering a safe and cost-effective solution for pain relief, improved function, and enhanced quality of life in patients with end-stage knee arthritis.[6] Research has consistently shown that many elective TKA patients can safely experience reduced lengths of stay (LOS) without increased post-discharge complications.[7] LOS is the most significant cost factor in elective TKA[8] and a key indicator of care quality.[9]

Accurately predicting LOS is crucial because it enables surgeons to optimize patient care, plan for rapid recovery, and help patients manage their expectations. In addition, it can provide a foundation for more tailored healthcare policies. Focusing on modifiable clinical risk factors is essential for improving the recovery and discharge outcomes in TKA patients.[10]

Reducing the duration of hospital stay while shifting more postoperative care to the home environment has notable advantages, including reduced costs associated with immediate post-surgical care.[11] However, there are concerns that shorter hospitalizations could lead to increased complications or re-admissions, particularly among high-risk patients.[12] Moreover, reducing hospital stay may burden patients, caregivers, and surgeons.[13,14] This study aimed to assess LOS following primary TKA procedures conducted between January 2019 and June 2024 at Prince Metaab Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia. It also sought to analyze re-admission rates after discharge and identify the factors contributing to these re-admissions.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design

This was a retrospective observational analytical study of individuals in the orthopedic surgery department who underwent primary TKA at Prince Metaab Bin Abdulaziz Hospital between January 2019 and June 2024 for the first time.

2.2. Sampling and recruitment

All patients who were diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis and underwent primary TKA during the specified period were included in the study. Patients with indications other than primary knee osteoarthritis or those who underwent revision knee surgery were excluded. In total, 194 patients met the inclusion criteria.

2.3. Data collection

Electronic health records provided relevant information, which was systematically compiled through a Google Form with 3 segments:

  • The first part collected demographic details, namely age, sex, BMI, existing diseases, and history of tobacco smoking.

  • The second part included particulars pertinent to admission parameters, such as duration of stay (in days), ambulation, hemoglobin level, and blood transfusion.

  • The last segment collected data on re-admission, including rate, duration of stay post re-admission, causes of re-admission, ASA grade, and any other documented postoperative complications.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The dataset was prepared using Excel and later brought to SPSS version 27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago) for analysis. Normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed by displaying both histograms and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were described as median and interquartile range, while categorical variables were described in terms of frequency and percentages. The relationship between length of hospital stay and demographic data was evaluated using a negative binomial regression model. A P-value < .05 was deemed to be clinically significant.

2.5. Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hail Health Cluster (IRB number:2024-58). Anonymity and confidentiality were maintained. Data were stored securely and accessible only to the research team, and all identifiers were removed prior to analysis.

3. Results

This study included 194 patients with a median age of 63 years. Most patients were females (77%), and only 23% were males. Only 2.1% of the patients had normal weight, while the majority were obese (72%) and overweight (26%). Approximately 15% of patients were smokers. Most patients had hypertension (49%), diabetes (37%), immunological (32%), cardiovascular (18%), neurological (15%), respiratory (13%), and renal (12%) diseases (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of study participants.

Characteristic N = 194
Age 63 (56, 72)
Gender
 Female 150 (77%)
 Male 44 (23%)
Body mass index
 Normal 4 (2.1%)
 Overweight 50 (26%)
 Obese 140 (72%)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension 96 (49%)
 Diabetes 72 (37%)
 Immunological disease 62 (32%)
 Cardiovascular disease 34 (18%)
 Neurological disease 30 (15%)
 Respiratory disease 26 (13%)
 Renal disease 23 (12%)
 Dyslipidemia 16 (8.2%)
 Anemia 16 (8.2%)
 Hypothyroidism 18 (9.3%)
 Other chronic disease 109 (56%)
History of smoking
 No 165 (85%)
 Yes 29 (15%)

The median LOS was 4 days. Approximately 38% stayed for 1–3 days, 47.4% and 14.9% stayed for 4–6 days and 7–16 days, respectively. Most patients were able to mobilize after surgery (96%). Only 12% required blood transfusion and 12% received blood postoperatively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Postoperative length of stay and complications among patients with total knee arthroplasty.

Characteristic N = 194*
Length of stay in days 4.00 (2.00, 6.00)
The ability to mobility after surgery
 No 7 (3.6%)
 Yes 187 (96%)
Postoperative hemoglobin
 No 170 (88%)
 Yes 24 (12%)
Blood receive
 No 171 (88%)
 Yes 23 (12%)
*

Median (IQR); n (%).

Approximately 93.3% of the patients did not experience re-admission, while 6.7% were readmitted. The LOS after re-admission varied, with 93.3% of participants not requiring further hospitalization, 4.6% staying 1–3 days, and 2.06% staying 4–7 days. The reasons for re-admission included the need for emergency department admission (0.5%), infection (1.5%), joint pain (2.1%), knee stiffness (2.1%), and vascular surgery (0.5%). Regarding ASA grade, 6.7% of the patients were classified as grade 1, 65% as grade 2, and 28% as grade 3. Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of the patients, while the majority (90%) did not experience complications (Table 3).

Table 3.

Readmission rates, causes, and duration.

Characteristic N = 194*
Re-admission
 No 181 (93.3%)
 Yes 13 (6.7%)
Length of stay after readmission
 None 181 (93.3%)
 1–3 d 9 (4.6%)
 4–7 d 4 (2.06%)
Reasons for Re-admission
 Need for Emergency Department admission 1 (0.5%)
 Infection 3 (1.5%)
 Joint pain 4 (2.1%)
 Knee stiffness 4 (2.1%)
 Vascular surgery 1 (0.5%)
 Not admitted 181 (93.3%)
ASA grade
 1 13 (6.7%)
 2 127 (65%)
 3 54 (28%)
Postoperative complication
 No 174 (90%)
 Yes 20 (10%)
*

Median (IQR); n (%).

An explanatory stepwise negative binomial regression model was used to determine the factors that influenced LOS. This is because of the overdispersed nature of the LOS data, and as a result, the negative binomial model was used instead of the Poisson regression model. The intercept is estimated to be 1.517 (SE = 0.3796, P < .001), and the expected log count of LOS if the other independent variables were at their baseline or reference level. This also means that the expected LOS is approximately 4. 558 days; Exp(B) = 4.558, 95% CI: 2.166 to 9.593).

In backward stepwise negative binomial regression analysis, variables with P-values above .10 were removed and those with a P-value below .05 were retained. The approach began with a comprehensive model that included all potential predictors: sex, mobility ability after surgery, postoperative hemoglobin, blood receive, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, anemia, hypothyroidism, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, renal disease, neurological disease, immunological disease, ASA grade, history of smoking, age, and BMI. The initial model thus indicated the effect of these variables, although not all of them significantly affected the LOS. In the stepwise method, the variables were removed individually because of their nonsignificance to the model fit and contribution to the model, including sex, postoperative hemoglobin, blood receive, diabetes, hypertension, anemia, hypothyroidism, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, neurological disease, immunological disease, age, and BMI.

The final model retained key predictors, including mobility after surgery, dyslipidemia, ASA grade, and smoking history. Namely, a higher postoperative mobilization level was related to a significantly lower LOS (Exp(B) = 0.578, P < .001)), whereas dyslipidemia was associated with an increased LOS (Exp(B) = 1.522, P < .001). Patients with ASA grade 2 were more likely to have a shorter LOS than those with ASA grade 3 (Exp(B) = 0.749, P = .002), whereas a history of smoking was associated with an increased LOS (Exp(B) = 1.407, P < .001). The last model proved to be the best fit because the number of deviances/degrees of freedom ratio was 1.271 and Pearson Chi-Square/df ratio of 1.332, which satisfies the data, indicates that the model has a good fit with the data. The Akaike Information Criterion of the final model was 866.94 less than that of the initial model (Akaike Information Criterion = 879). 68, indicating that it was a more efficient model (Table 4).

Table 4.

Association between length of stay in hospital and patients’ characteristics using negative binomial regression model n = 194.

Parameter B Std. error 95% Wald confidence interval Hypothesis test Exp(B) 95% Wald confidence interval for Exp(B)
Lower Upper Wald Chi-Square df Sig. Lower Upper
(Intercept) 2.076 0.1525 1.777 2.375 185.279 1 .000 7.972 5.912 10.749
[Ability of mobility after surgery = 1.00] −0.549 0.1428 −0.829 −0.269 14.771 1 .000 0.578 0.437 0.764
[Ability of mobility after surgery = 2.00] 0 1
[History of smoking = 1.00] 0.342 0.0848 0.175 0.508 16.208 1 .000 1.407 1.192 1.662
[History of smoking = 2.00] 0 1
[respiratory disease = 1.00] −0.366 0.1170 −0.596 −0.137 9.806 1 .002 0.693 0.551 0.872
[respiratory disease = 2.00] 0 1
[ASA grade = 1.00] 0.072 0.1332 −0.189 0.333 0.294 1 .588 1.075 0.828 1.396
[ASA grade = 2.00] −0.231 0.0760 −0.380 −0.082 9.240 1 .002 0.794 0.684 0.921
[ASA grade = 3.00] 0 1
[Dyslipidemia = 1.00] 0.420 0.1160 0.192 0.647 13.089 1 .000 1.522 1.212 1.910
[Dyslipidemia = 2.00] 0 1

4. Discussion

This cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the factors associated with the length of stay (LOS) after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery at Prince Mettab Hospital. The study also involved 194 patients, with a mean age of 63 years, and 77% of the total patients were females. The majority of patients were classified as either obese (72%) or overweight (26%), and all patients had some form of comorbid disease, including hypertension (49%), diabetes (37%), and dyslipidemia. The median LOS was 4 days, with re-admission rates being relatively low at 6.7%). As such, TKR patients were discharged a few days from the hospital, and such factors are worth further investigation.

It has been shown through negative binomial regression analysis that there are several significant determinants of LOS. Postoperative mobility is one of the most important factors. Patients who by 2 weeks after surgery achieved a certain degree of mobility had a much shorter LOS, whereas patients who were more sedentary were more likely to have longer lengths of stay. This addition is in good agreement with the increasing amount of literature that provides evidence on how early postoperative management leads to enhanced recovery. Previous studies have demonstrated the significance of early mobilization post-surgery. In fact, LOS is improved by a decrease of about 1.8 days post surgical mobilization.[1517] These, however, come to the realization that it increases the recovery of the patients; however, it also decreases the incidence of post-surgical complications, such as thromboembolic illnesses and infections acquired within the hospital. Of the patients assessed, 96% were able to mobilize, resulting in a low median LOS of 4 days.

Smoking history is an additional determinant of a prolonged LOS. Smokers had a significantly longer hospital stay than non-smokers, which is consistent with the adverse effects of smoking on the process of healing in general. It has been established that smoking decreases the rate of recovery following surgery while also increasing the chance of surgical complications and causing unhealed wounds that elongate hospital stays.[17] Indeed, it has been confirmed that both the short- and long-term effects of smoking on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems are well known to complicate recovery, hence increasing the length of hospital stay.[18]

Dyslipidemia is one of the most common metabolic disorders and is associated with longer hospitalizations. Patients with dyslipidemia may have more complicated recoveries due to increased chances of cardiovascular complications, which are bound to fetch delays in the healing process and prolong the period of recovery.[15] Another conclusion is the need to address this specific metabolic condition to minimize the negative impact of other diseases that might affect surgical outcomes.

LOS was also associated with the ASA, physical status classification which was regarded as one of the most significant predictors of LOS. Patients with a high ASA grade had poor outcomes, resulting in prolonged hospital stays, which is consistent with the literature that links high ASA grades to poor recoveries. In particular, those who were classified as ASA grade 2 had a lower chance of being hospitalized for an extended period upon discharge (Exp(B) = 0.794), while most ASA grades were associated with prolonged hospital stays associated with the presence of other diseases.[15,17,18] This is similar to other studies conducted by other researchers, including that of Fahd on knee replacement; indeed, he was able to identify intraoperative blood loss, ASA grade, and operative time as key factors associated with the length of hospital stay post surgery.[19] Similarly, a UK-based study found that older age, higher BMI, higher ASA grades, and the need for postoperative blood transfusions were key determinants of longer stays.[16,20]

Interestingly, respiratory diseases, which are often considered risk factors for prolonged hospitalization, were managed effectively in this cohort, leading to shorter stays. This may be attributed to optimized perioperative care strategies that address respiratory conditions, thereby preventing complications and promoting faster recovery. The effective management of respiratory comorbidities could be a contributing factor to the overall shorter LOS observed in this study than in other settings.

In terms of postoperative complications, only 10% of the patients experienced significant issues, and 12% required blood transfusions. These rates were lower than those reported in studies conducted in central Saudi Arabia, where transfusion rates ranged from 29% to 35%.[2123] Postoperative blood transfusions have been associated with extended hospital stays in other studies, highlighting the importance of perioperative blood management strategies. Correcting hemoglobin levels and maintaining proper intraoperative hemostasis could potentially reduce the need for transfusions and, in turn, shorten the LOS.

The low re-admission rate (6.7%) observed in this study is noteworthy given the complexity of TKR surgery and the potential for complications. The most common reasons for re-admission included infection (1.5%), joint pain (2.1%), knee stiffness (2.1%), and vascular intervention (0.5%). In comparison, studies conducted in other countries, such as Australia and Scotland, have reported higher re-admission rates (3% and 6%, respectively).[24,25]

5. Implications and recommendations

The findings of this study underscore the multifactorial nature of hospital stay after TKR surgery. Both modifiable risk factors, such as smoking history and postoperative mobility, and intrinsic patient characteristics, such as ASA grade and the presence of comorbidities, such as dyslipidemia, play pivotal roles in determining LOS.

Interventions aimed at targeting these modifiable risk factors could potentially reduce the duration of the hospital stay. For instance, smoking cessation programs should be integrated into the presurgical care of patients undergoing TKR, as smoking has been shown to delay recovery. Similarly, enhancing post-surgical mobility through early mobilization protocols could help patients recover more quickly and reduce their LOS. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which emphasize early mobilization and efficient management of complications, could further decrease LOS and minimize the risk of hospital-acquired infections and thromboembolic events.

The presence of comorbidities such as dyslipidemia necessitates more personalized perioperative management strategies. Patients with high-risk profiles, including those with metabolic or cardiovascular disorders, may benefit from tailored recovery plans that address their specific needs. Improved perioperative care, including better management of respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, can significantly reduce complications and the LOS.

Future studies should focus on refining perioperative management strategies for high-risk patients and expanding the study to include larger and more diverse populations. Additionally, prospective follow-up studies are needed to capture the post-discharge complications that may occur in other healthcare settings.

6. Limitations

The primary limitation of this study is its cross-sectional design, which restricts its ability to capture long-term outcomes and complications that may arise after discharge. Furthermore, the lack of prospective follow-up limits the understanding of re-admissions that occur in different emergency departments or clinics outside the study setting. Another limitation is the small sample size, but the results are similar to what has been published. Future research should consider a longitudinal design to better assess long-term recovery and post-discharge complications.

7. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrated a relatively short median postoperative LOS of 4 days for patients undergoing TKR at Prince Mettab Hospital, with low complication and re-admission rates. Key predictors of LOS included postoperative mobility, smoking history, dyslipidemia, and ASA score. Interventions that target modifiable risk factors, such as smoking cessation and early mobilization, could further reduce the LOS and improve overall patient outcomes. Enhanced perioperative management of comorbidities, particularly in patients with higher ASA grades, is also essential for reducing recovery times and improving postoperative care.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our appreciation to the entire hospital staff for their invaluable support throughout our research. Our deepest gratitude goes to Dr Saqer Al-Ruwaili, Dr Bandar Al-Maeen, and Dr Ahmed Al-Anzi. We are profoundly grateful for their contributions, guidance, and the time they devoted to making this work possible. We extend our gratitude to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for their support in conducting this research.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Ahmed Hassan Kamal, Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari, Saif Farhan Alruwaili.

Data curation: Ahmed Hassan Kamal, Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari, Faisal Musafiq Alruwaili, Abdulmohsen Nayef Alenzi, Saif Farhan Alruwaili, Abdulelah Essam Saba, Abdulaziz Saeed Almutlaq, Sultan Ayed Alanazi, Khalid Omar Alsharari.

Formal analysis: Ahmed Hassan Kamal, Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari.

Funding acquisition: Ahmed Hassan Kamal.

Investigation: Faisal Musafiq Alruwaili, Abdulmohsen Nayef Alenzi, Saif Farhan Alruwaili, Abdulelah Essam Saba, Abdulaziz Saeed Almutlaq, Sultan Ayed Alanazi, Khalid Omar Alsharari.

Methodology: Ahmed Hassan Kamal, Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari.

Project administration: Ahmed Hassan Kamal.

Software: Ahmed Hassan Kamal.

Supervision: Ahmed Hassan Kamal.

Validation: Faisal Musafiq Alruwaili, Abdulmohsen Nayef Alenzi, Abdulaziz Saeed Almutlaq, Sultan Ayed Alanazi, Khalid Omar Alsharari.

Visualization: Saif Farhan Alruwaili, Abdulelah Essam Saba.

Writing – original draft: Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari.

Writing – review & editing: Ahmed Hassan Kamal.

Abbreviations:

ASA
American Society of Anesthesiologists
LOS
length of stay
OA
osteoarthritis
TKA
total knee arthroplasty

This research was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (grant number: KFU252802).

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hail Health Cluster (IRB number:2024-58).

How to cite this article: Kamal AH, Alsharari AS, Alruwaili FM, Alenzi AN, Alruwaili SF, Saba AE, Almutlaq AS, Alanazi SA, Alsharari KO. Length of hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty among obese patients: A single-center study. Medicine 2025;104:45(e45939).

Contributor Information

Abdulmajeed Salem Alsharari, Email: Khaledalshrari0@gmail.com.

Faisal Musafiq Alruwaili, Email: saiif199a@gmail.com.

Abdulmohsen Nayef Alenzi, Email: M7sntop@gmail.com.

Saif Farhan Alruwaili, Email: saiif199a@gmail.com.

Abdulelah Essam Saba, Email: bady99121@gmail.com.

Abdulaziz Saeed Almutlaq, Email: abdulaziz.almutlaq6@gmail.com.

Sultan Ayed Alanazi, Email: Dr_Sulltan@Hotmail.com.

Khalid Omar Alsharari, Email: Khaledalshrari0@gmail.com.

References

  • [1].Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393:1745–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1545–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29-30:100587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Makhdom AM, Bokhary OA. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia: a systematic literature review. J Musculoskeletal Surg Res. 2023;7:235–40. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Abd El-Aziz GS, Gomaa W, Hegaze A, et al. Analytical study of clinicopathological data of Saudi patients with osteoarthritis subjected to total knee arthroplasty. Int J Morphol. 2019;37:1089–94. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet (London, England). 2018;392:1672–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Sculco PK, Pagnano MW. Perioperative solutions for rapid recovery joint arthroplasty: get ahead and stay ahead. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:518–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lovse L, Poitras S, Dobransky J, Huang A, Beaulé PE. Should the pareto principle be applied as a cost savings method in hip and knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2841–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Bowyer A, Colin Royse M. The importance of postoperative quality of recovery: influences, assessment, and clinical and prognostic implications. Can J Anesth. 2016;63:176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Li H, Jiao J, Zhang S, Tang H, Qu X, Yue B. Construction and comparison of predictive models for length of stay after total knee arthroplasty: regression model and machine learning analysis based on 1,826 cases in a single Singapore center. J Knee Surg. 2022;35:007–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Lovecchio F, Alvi H, Sahota S, Beal M, Manning D. Is outpatient arthroplasty as safe as fast-track inpatient arthroplasty? A propensity score matched analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Courtney PM, Rozell JC, Melnic CM, Lee G-C. Who should not undergo short stay hip and knee arthroplasty? Risk factors associated with major medical complications following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Manohar A, Cheung K, Wu CL, Stierer TS. Burden incurred by patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery: a prospective observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1416–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Shah RP, Karas V, Berger RA. Rapid discharge and outpatient total joint arthroplasty introduce a burden of care to the surgeon. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1307–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hara K, Kanda M, Kobayashi Y, Miyamoto T, Inoue T. Factors affecting the length of hospital stay for total knee arthroplasty in Japan: a retrospective study using the diagnosis procedure combination database. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29:122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Ong P, Pua Y. A prediction model for length of stay after total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:1490–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Song X, Xia C, Li Q, et al. Perioperative predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study from a single center in China. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Shah A, Memon M, Kay J, Wood TJ, Tushinski DM, Khanna V; McMaster Arthroplasty Collective (MAC) group. Preoperative patient factors affecting length of stay following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2124–65.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Aljuaid FI. Can relative blood loss and operative time predict prolonged length of stay following total joint arthroplasty? A retrospective study from single center in Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hospital Med. 2021;84:2474–9. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Jonas SC, Smith HK, Blair PS, Dacombe P, Weale AE. Factors influencing length of stay following primary total knee replacement in a UK specialist orthopaedic centre. The Knee. 2013;20:310–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Al-Otaibi ML. Total knee replacement at Southwestern Saudi Arabia: a single-center experience. J Family Med Primary Care. 2021;10:2166–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Al-Turki AA, Al-Araifi AK, Badakhan BA, Al-Nazzawi MT, Alghnam S, Al-Turki AS. Predictors of blood transfusion following total knee replacement at a tertiary care center in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2017;38:598–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Alturki AA, Algufaili RS, Alnefaie MN, Almojel SA, Alghnam S, Alhandi AA. Indications of blood transfusion following total knee replacement at a tertiary care center in central Saudi Arabia. J Musculoskeletal Surg Res. 2020;4:132. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Scholes C, Cowley M, Ebrahimi M, Genon M, Martin SJ. Factors affecting hospital length of stay following total knee replacement: a retrospective analysis in a regional hospital. J Knee Surg. 2021;34:552–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Smith I, Elton R, Ballantyne J, Brenkel I. Pre-operative predictors of the length of hospital stay in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2008;90:1435–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES