Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1991 Nov;60(5):1288–1294. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82162-2

Applicability of the coefficient of variation method for analyzing synaptic plasticity.

D S Faber 1, H Korn 1
PMCID: PMC1260182  PMID: 1684726

Abstract

The classical coefficient of variation method for "quantal" analysis of synaptic responses allows unambiguous identification of pre- and postsynaptic loci underlying synaptic plasticity only when extensive simplifying restrictions are made. They include invariance of quantal parameters and the assumption that a single afferent produces the evoked potentials or currents. More general theoretical formulations and simulations demonstrate that the standard criteria do not always provide useful guidelines because when the other sources of physiological variance are included, putative pre- and postsynaptic domains may overlap. For example, data typically interpreted as indicating modifications at both sites can be due to a mechanism localized to only one of the two, if parameter variances are taken into consideration in the case of a single input cell, or if there are multiple inputs and the stimulus does not activate all of them reliably. With this perspective, other physiologically realistic hypotheses relevant to the expression of synaptic plasticity, such as that during long-term potentiation, can be envisioned.

Full text

PDF
1288

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bekkers J. M., Stevens C. F. Presynaptic mechanism for long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1990 Aug 23;346(6286):724–729. doi: 10.1038/346724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson E. W., Wernig A. The binomial nature of transmitter release at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1971 Nov;218(3):757–767. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KUNO M. MECHANSIM OF FACILITATION AND DEPRESSION OF THE EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC POTENTIAL IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1964 Dec;175:100–112. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Korn H., Fassnacht C., Faber D. S. Is maintenance of LTP presynaptic? Nature. 1991 Mar 28;350(6316):282–282. doi: 10.1038/350282a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Korn H., Mallet A., Triller A., Faber D. S. Transmission at a central inhibitory synapse. II. Quantal description of release, with a physical correlate for binomial n. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Sep;48(3):679–707. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.3.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Korn H., Triller A., Mallet A., Faber D. S. Fluctuating responses at a central synapse: n of binomial fit predicts number of stained presynaptic boutons. Science. 1981 Aug 21;213(4510):898–901. doi: 10.1126/science.6266015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuno M., Weakly J. N. Quantal components of the inhibitory synaptic potential in spinal mononeurones of the cat. J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):287–303. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin J. W., Faber D. S. Synaptic transmission mediated by single club endings on the goldfish Mauthner cell. II. Plasticity of excitatory postsynaptic potentials. J Neurosci. 1988 Apr;8(4):1313–1325. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-04-01313.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lüscher H. R., Ruenzel P., Henneman E. How the size of motoneurones determines their susceptibility to discharge. Nature. 1979 Dec 20;282(5741):859–861. doi: 10.1038/282859a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Malinow R., Tsien R. W. Presynaptic enhancement shown by whole-cell recordings of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Nature. 1990 Jul 12;346(6280):177–180. doi: 10.1038/346177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McNaughton B. L., Barnes C. A., Andersen P. Synaptic efficacy and EPSP summation in granule cells of rat fascia dentata studied in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Nov;46(5):952–966. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.5.952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Redman S. Quantal analysis of synaptic potentials in neurons of the central nervous system. Physiol Rev. 1990 Jan;70(1):165–198. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Triller A., Korn H. Transmission at a central inhibitory synapse. III. Ultrastructure of physiologically identified and stained terminals. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Sep;48(3):708–736. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.3.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES