Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2025 Oct 28;16:1665511. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1665511

Effects of the dietary protein-to-energy ratio on the growth performance, body composition, and health status of large-sized grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella

Zhangbin Liao 1,2,*, Lei Wang 1,*, Biao Yun 1, Xiaolin Dong 1, Fengchi Niu 1, Jian Wang 1, Xueqiao Qian 1, Xueming Hua 2
PMCID: PMC12602221  PMID: 41230115

Abstract

A 56-day feeding trial was performed to investigate the effects of the dietary protein-to-energy (P/E) ratio on the growth performance, body composition, and health status of large-sized grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella. The fish (initial body weight 2,200.4 ± 79.3 g) were randomly fed one of the six isolipidic and isoenergetic diets (gross energy 10 kJ/g), which were formulated with various P/E ratios (21.7 mg/kJ, 23.7 mg/kJ, 24.9 mg/kJ, 27.1 mg/kJ, 29.2 mg/kJ, and 31.5 mg/kJ) and named P/E 21.7, P/E 23.7, P/E 24.9, P/E 27.1, P/E 29.2 mg/kJ and P/E 31.5, respectively. After the feeding trial, the best growth performance was observed in the P/E 29.2 group, which had the highest weight gain. In addition, fish fed the optimal P/E diet exhibited a superior health status in terms of tissue histology and biochemical analyses of serum and liver. The liver transcriptome assay revealed that a suitable P/E ratio potentially enhances growth performance and immune function by modulating the AMPK signaling pathway, the Ras signaling pathway, and arachidonic acid metabolism, along with affecting rRNA synthesis by regulating ribosome biogenesis gene expression in eukaryotes. Based on the second-order polynomial regression analysis of the growth performance and health status against P/E, the optimal P/E range was found to be 27.36–28.93.

Keywords: grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, protein-to-energy ratio, growth performance, health status

1 Introduction

The rapid development of aquaculture has been driven by the increasing global demand for aquatic products. Aquafeed accounts for 50%–70% of aquaculture operational costs, largely due to the incorporation of a high percentage of protein needed for tissue growth, maintenance, and reproduction (Zehra and Khan, 2012; Gonçalves et al., 2018). From an economic standpoint, optimizing protein utilization for tissue synthesis rather than energy metabolism is critical. Carbohydrates can be used as the most economical source of energy for aquaculture animals. Adequate levels of carbohydrates, such as starch, can promote a protein-sparing effect, which ultimately results in an optimal cost/benefit ratio and a reduction in ammonia excretion (Enes et al., 2009; Pérez-Jiménez et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2024). Many studies have implied that carbohydrate requirements vary among different fish species. With high intestinal amylase activity and an efficient blood glucose regulation mechanism, herbivorous fish can make good use of carbohydrates in their diet, and carbohydrate content in some fish diets can be as high as 40% (Mohapatra et al., 2003; Tian et al., 2012; Kamalam et al., 2017).

The grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, is a typical herbivorous, agastric finfish and one of the most important species cultured in China (Jin et al., 2015). Current research predominantly focuses on individual macronutrients, such as protein and carbohydrates. Studies on protein-to-energy (P/E) ratio requirements have been limited primarily to young grass carp (Yu et al., 2022). Notably, there is a lack of studies addressing large-sized grass carp. To address this gap, it is imperative to conduct systematic investigations into the P/E ratio requirements specifically for large-sized grass carp.

The present study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of the dietary P/E ratio on growth performance in large-sized grass carp; (2) analyze the biochemical parameters of liver, serum, and intestinal histology to evaluate the effects of the dietary P/E ratio on health status;, and (3) analyze the liver transcriptome profiles to explore the effects of the dietary P/E ratio on liver metabolism. These findings provide new insights into the P/E ratio requirements for large-sized grass carp.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental diets and fish

The proximate composition of the experimental diets is presented in Table 1. Six isolipidic and isoenergetic diets (gross energy 10 kJ/g) were formulated with various P/E ratios (P/E 21.7 mg/kJ, P/E 23.7 mg/kJ, P/E 24.9 mg/kJ, P/E 27.1 mg/kJ, P/E 29.2 mg/kJ, and 31.5 mg/kJ) and named P/E 21.7, P/E 23.7, P/E 24.9, P/E 27.1, P/E 29.2, and P/E 31.5, respectively. All the ingredients were obtained from Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd. (China). The diets were prepared, packed, and stored following the procedures of a previous study (Dong et al., 2019).

TABLE 1.

Formulation and composition of experimental diets (% on a dry matter basis).

Ingredients P/E 21.7 P/E 23.7 P/E 24.9 P/E 27.1 P/E 29.2 P/E 31.5
Soybean meal 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 22.2 27.2
Rapeseed meal 12.5 18.5 24.5 30.5 30.5 30.5
Distillers dried grains with solubles 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Wheat meal 48.0 42.0 36.0 30.0 25.0 20.0
Soybean oil 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Soya lecithin 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Monocalcium phosphate 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Sodium chloride 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Choline chloride 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
Vitamin premix a 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Mineral premix b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Antioxidants 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Calcium 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Bentonite 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Proximate composition
Crude protein 22.8 24.4 25.4 27.0 28.9 30.6
Crude lipid 6.22 6.06 6.30 6.27 6.16 6.19
Energy (kJ/g) c 10.5 10.3 10.2 9.98 9.88 9.71
Protein/energy (P/E, (mg/kJ)) 21.7 23.7 24.9 27.1 29.2 31.5
a

Vitamin premix (mg/kg diet): thiamin, 20; riboflavin, 20; pyridoxine, 20; cyanocobalamin, 0.02; folic acid, 5; calcium pantothenate, 50; inositol, 100; niacin, 100; biotin, 0.1; starch, 645.2; ascorbic acid, 100; vitamin A, 110; vitamin D, 20; vitamin E, 50; vitamin K, 10.

b

Mineral premix (mg/kg diet): NaCl, 500; MgSO4·7H2O, 4,575; NaH2PO4·2H2O, 12,500; KH2PO4, 16,000; Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O, 6,850; FeSO4, 1,250; C6H10CaO6·5H2O, 1750; ZnSO4·7H2O, 111; MnSO4·4H2O, 61.4; CuSO4·5H2O, 15.5; CoSO4·6H2O, 19.02; KI, 178.33; corn starch, 6,253.33.

c

Estimated energy was calculated based on 16.9 kJ/g protein, 37.6 kJ/g lipid, and 16.7 kJ/g carbohydrate.

This feeding trial was conducted at the Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd., Seagull Island aquaculture base. Prior to the experiment, the experimental fish were acclimated in a large net cage (8 m × 16 m × 2 m) in the pond and fed a commercial feed for 30 days. Following a 24-h fasting period, fish were randomly distributed into 24 net cages (4 m × 4 m × 2 m). Each cage contained 10 fish (initial body weight approximately 2,200 g). Each experimental feed was randomly assigned to one of the four cages. The fish were reared for 8 weeks and fed three times daily at 7:00, 12:00, and 17:00. Water quality parameters were maintained within the following ranges: temperature, 27–32 °C; ammonia nitrogen, 0.2–0.6 mg/L; dissolved oxygen, 5–7 mg/L; pH, 6.7–7.0.

At the end of the feeding experiment, the fish were fasted for 24 h. After that, they were exposed to MS222 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) with a concentration of 0.2% (w/v) for 5 min until cessation of opercular movement. The number and weight of fish per cage were recorded. Two fish were randomly selected from each cage for serum, liver, intestinal, and muscle sampling. The remaining fish were returned to the cage to recover. Blood was collected from the tail vein and allowed to clot at room temperature for 2 h, then placed at 4 °C for 6 h. After centrifugation (836 g, 10 min, 4 °C), the supernatant was collected as serum samples. After dissection, before collecting tissue samples, the weight and body length of two randomly selected fish were recorded, along with the weights of the liver and viscera, to calculate the hepatosomatic index (HSI), viscerosomatic index (VSI), and condition factor (CF). Two small liver tissue samples (from the liver tip) and two muscle tissue samples (from the dorsal muscle, measuring approximately 3 cm × 1.5 cm) were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −86 °C. Additionally, two small liver tissue samples (from the liver tip) and two midgut tissue samples were immediately fixed in 4% formaldehyde, followed by standard tissue processing for dehydration, paraffin embedding, sectioning, and HE staining (hematoxylin–eosin) for microscopic observation and photography of liver and intestinal tissue morphology.

All experimental procedures were performed in strict accordance with the Management Rule of Laboratory Animals (Chinese Order No. 676 of the State Council, revised 1 March 2017).

2.2 Proximate composition of diets and tissues and biochemical parameters of liver and serum

The proximate composition of diets and tissues was analyzed with the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration (AOAC) standard methods. For the analysis of moisture, samples were dried in a 105 °C oven until the weight was constant. Ash, crude protein, and crude lipid content were assayed by 550 °C incineration (8 h), the Kjeldahl method (FOSS 2300), and the chloroform–methanol method, respectively.

Serum and liver biochemical indices, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), malondialdehyde (MDA), triacylglycerol (TG), total cholesterol (T-CHO), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hepatic glycogen, and serum glucose, were analyzed using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

α-amylase, trypsin, and lipase in the intestine were analyzed using commercial kits (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.3 RNA isolation, cDNA library construction, and Illumina sequencing

The detailed methods for RNA isolation, cDNA library construction, and sequencing were described previously (Liao et al., 2024). Pooled samples from two individual fish from each cage were used (groups P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 were used as characteristic groups). The data processing and enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between groups followed the method used by Liao et al. (2024).

2.4 Calculations and statistical analysis

Weight gain rate WGR,%=final body weightinitial body weight/ initial body weight×100
Feed conversion ratio FCR=feed consumption / body weight gain
Condition factor CF,g/cm3=final body weight / final body length3×100
Hepatosomatic index HSI,%=liver weight / body weight×100
Viscerosomatic index VSI,%=viscera weight / body weight×100
Liposomatic index LSI,%=abdominal lipid weight / body weight×100

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, United States). All data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Tukey’s multiple range test or an independent sample t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Growth performance, somatic indices, and body composition

In the present study, no fish mortality was found in any group. As the P/E ratio increased, the weight gain rate increased up to P/E 29.2, after which it decreased; the weight gain rate of the P/E 29.2 group was significantly higher than that of the P/E 21.7, P/E 23.7, and P/E 31.5 groups (P < 0.05) (Figure 1), while the feed conversion ratio showed an opposite trend. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in HSI, VSI, LSI, or CF (Supplementary Figure S1). Based on the second-order polynomial regression analysis of the weight gain rate against P/E, the optimal P/E level was 27.36 (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

Bar graphs and a scatter plot depict various nutritional metrics across different protein-to-energy ratios (P/E). Panels (A) to (F) show data on weight gain rate, feed conversion ratio, lipid percentage, glycogen content, and protein percentage. Each bar corresponds to a unique P/E ratio, displaying statistical significance with letter indicators. Panel (G) features a scatter plot illustrating weight gain rate against P/E ratio, including a polynomial trend line and equation. The optimal P/E value for weight gain rate is marked.

Effects of dietary protein-to-energy (P/E) ratios on the growth performance and tissue composition of large-sized grass carp [(A) weight gain rate; (B) feed efficiency ratio; (C) and (D) liver lipid and glycogen content (of wet weight, ww); (E) and (F) muscle lipid and protein content (ww), and (G) relationship of weight gain rate with dietary P/E, respectively] of large-sized grass carp. Data bars with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

As the P/E ratio increased, the liver lipid content showed a downward trend, and the glycogen content decreased and then stabilized, while there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in liver moisture and protein content. Muscle lipid content showed a downward trend with increasing P/E ratios, while protein content showed the opposite trend. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in moisture content.

3.2 Biochemical parameters

In the liver, as the P/E ratio increased, the content of MDA decreased down to P/E 29.2, after which it increased (Figure 2), while the SOD activity showed an overall upward trend. T-AOC was highest in the P/E 29.2 group and was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.05). ALT activity decreased with an increase in the dietary P/E ratio and then stabilized. The TG content showed a decreasing trend. No significant differences (P > 0.05) in T-CHO, HDL-C, LDL-C, or PC content were found among the groups (Supplementary Figure S2). Based on the second-order polynomial regression analysis of ALT activity against P/E, the optimal P/E level was 28.93 (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

Six bar charts and one scatter plot analyze biochemical markers with varying protein-to-energy ratios. Charts display MDA, SOD, T-AOC, TG, and ALT levels, each labeled with significance indicators. The scatter plot correlates protein-to-energy ratio with ALT levels, showing a quadratic trend line.

Effects of dietary P/E ratios on the liver biochemical parameters of large-sized grass carp. Data bars with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

The MDA, T-AOC, and ALT activities in serum showed the same trend as in the liver, while glucose levels showed an overall decreasing trend with the increase of the dietary P/E ratio (Figure 3). No significant differences (P > 0.05) in T-CHO, HDL-C, TG, or PC content were found among the groups.

FIGURE 3.

Bar graphs showing levels of MDA, T-AOC, ALT, and Glucose across six groups labeled P/E 21.7 to P/E 31.5. Each graph displays mean values with error bars and different letters indicating significant differences.

Effects of dietary P/E ratios on the serum biochemical parameters of large-sized grass carp. Data bars with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

In the intestine, trypsin activity increased with the increase in the dietary P/E ratio, reaching a maximum value in the P/E 29.2 group, and then, no further increase (Figure 4) was noted. As the dietary P/E ratio increased, α-amylase activity showed a continuous downward trend. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in lipase activity was noted among the groups.

FIGURE 4.

Three bar graphs display enzyme activity levels in U/g tissue for trypsin, α-amylase, and lipase across various P/E ratios. Trypsin peaks at P/E 31.5; α-amylase is highest at P/E 21.7 and declines thereafter, while lipase exhibits similar levels across all conditions. Different letters indicate significant differences.

Effects of dietary P/E ratios on the intestinal enzyme activity of large-sized grass carp. Data bars with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

3.3 Histological structure of tissues

Liver histology indicated that liver cells became smaller and intracellular lipid content decreased with the increase in dietary P/E ratio (Figure 5A). Increased villus quantity and height were observed in the intestinal histology (Figure 5B).

FIGURE 5.

Histological images labeled (A) show liver tissue sections at magnifications with P/E ratios of 21.7, 24.9, and 29.2. The D-HI region is circled in the first image. Images labeled (B) display intestinal tissue sections at the same P/E ratios, highlighting the villi structure with blue lines labeled "H" and "l" at different scales.

Effects of dietary P/E ratios on the tissue histology of large-sized grass carp. (A) and (B) Representative histology of liver and intestine, respectively. The red circles show necrosis of the liver parenchyma, namely, the damage to hepatocyte integrity (D-HI). The blue lines show the height (H) of the intestinal villi.

3.4 Transcriptomic results

Liver samples from the P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 groups were used for transcriptomic analysis. A total of 392 genes were differentially expressed (P value <0.05; fold change >2) between the P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 groups. Compared to the P/E 21.7 group, the P/E 29.2 group up-regulated the transcription of 238 genes and down-regulated that of 154 genes (Figure 6A). The DEGs were mostly enriched in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, such as the AMPK signaling pathway, arachidonic acid metabolism, Ras signaling pathway, ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, and necroptosis (Figure 6B), and in Gene Ontology (GO) terms such as organic acid metabolic process and small molecule metabolic process (Figure 6C).

FIGURE 6.

Panel A is a volcano plot showing gene expression changes, comparing P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 with points colored for upregulated (red), downregulated (blue), and unchanged (gray) genes. Panel B is a bubble chart of KEGG pathways, with bubble size and color indicating pathway significance and adjusted p-values. Panel C is a bubble chart of GO terms, with size and color representing significance and adjusted p-values for biological processes.

Effects of dietary P/E ratios on the liver transcriptome of large-sized grass carp. (A), (B) and (C) Representative volcano plot of liver gene expression and KEGG and GO pathway enrichment for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 groups, respectively. The spot size represents the number of DEGs significantly enriched in a pathway. P-adjust is the corrected P-value.

4 Discussion

The protein-to-energy (P/E) ratio represents a more reasonable approach for defining protein requirements in fish than specifying crude protein levels alone (National Research Council, 2011; Liu et al., 2023). The National Research Council (National Research Council, 2011) recommends a suitable P/E ratio range of 19–27 mg/kJ for the majority of fish species. In the present study, the dietary P/E ratio was varied from 21.7 to 31.5 by increasing the protein content and decreasing the starch content. After an 8-week feeding trial, the WGR showed an overall upward trend and then decreased with increasing dietary protein levels. A similar phenomenon has been observed in the studies of the dotted gizzard shad Konosirus punctatus (Liu et al., 2023), the grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella (Jin et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2022), the tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Wu et al., 2021), the striped surubim Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum (Silva et al., 2019), the fingerling Channa punctatus (Zehra and Khan, 2012), and the obscure pufferfish Takifugu obscurus (Ye et al., 2017). The observed growth reduction at high P/E ratios may be attributed to impaired protein metabolism, an increased nitrogen metabolism burden, and energetic inefficiency (Kiron et al., 1995; McGoogan and Gatlin, 1999; Zehra and Khan, 2012). Conversely, the FCR showed an opposite trend to the WGR. Notably, hepatic lipid content decreased with an increasing P/E ratio, accompanied by reduced hepatocyte size and intracellular lipid deposition. An isoenergetic experimental design necessitated a reduction in dietary starch as protein content increased. In the present study, grass carp fed high-starch diets accumulated greater glycogen deposition in their livers. These results are in agreement with those of several previous studies on Nile tilapia (Gaye-Siessegger et al., 2006), grass carp (Jin et al., 2015), and hybrid grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂ (Jiang et al., 2016), which found that a high-protein/low-carbohydrate diets lead to significantly higher lipid gains and apparent lipid conversion values. Another study reported that a low-protein/high-carbohydrate diet could increase the amount of acetyl coenzyme A and dihydroxyacetone phosphate during glycolysis, and more acetyl coenzyme A and dihydroxyacetone phosphate were used for lipid synthesis in obscure pufferfish (Ye et al., 2017). Unexpectedly, no significant difference was observed in body condition indices was observed with decreasing liver lipid content, which was in accordance with a previous study (Jiang et al., 2016).

A histological structure change that followed the P/E ratio was observed in the present study. In the low P/E ratio groups, hepatocyte vacuolization was observed in H&E-stained livers, suggesting lipid accumulation and potential metabolic dysfunction. This finding aligns with that of Zhao et al. (2023), who reported that a low P/E ratio induces hepatic structural damage and subsequent inflammatory responses, likely due to excessive lipid deposition resulting from impaired energy metabolism. Similar results have been reported in other fish species (Camargo and Martinez, 2007; Sun et al., 2019; Taj et al., 2023) and supporting the hypothesis that a suboptimal P/E ratio disrupts hepatic homeostasis. In addition, intestinal villus height and density significantly increased in groups fed an optimal P/E ratio, indicating an expanded absorptive surface area and enhanced digestive efficiency. These morphological improvements are consistent with previous studies in fish, which attributed such changes to balanced nutrient utilization and improved gut health under nutritionally adequate conditions (Xu et al., 2016; Taj et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2024).

High protein levels in a diet stimulate proteolytic secretion in some fish species (Péres et al., 1998; Krogdahl et al., 2003; Bakke et al., 2011). In addition, higher levels of enzyme activities are related to better growth performance and higher feed utilization in fish (Furné et al., 2005). In the present study, grass carp fed diets with a protein content that ranged from 22.8% to 30.6% showed a progressive increase in intestinal trypsin activity as protein content in the diet rose, reaching a plateau at 28.9% protein. Similar results were found in gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata (García-Meilán et al., 2013). With the increased dietary P/E ratio, α-amylase activity decreased. It is easy to understand how adjusting the protein and starch content of the isoenergetic feed used in this study works: a higher P/E ratio indicates more protein and less starch in the feed.

A variety of diets with different dietary P/E ratios were designed in the current study to determine the optimal diet for maintaining the health status of grass carp. SOD and T-AOC are important components of the antioxidant defense system in fish, whereas the main product of lipid peroxidation, MDA, is a key indicator of oxidative damage (Meng et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2023). Analysis of the livers and sera of the fish revealed that SOD and T-AOC activities, coupled with MDA levels, indicate that an appropriate dietary P/E ratio enhances the antioxidant capacity of grass carp. ALT, an enzyme predominantly localized in liver parenchymal cells, is a well-established clinical indicator of hepatic function and health. ALT levels in livers and sera indicated that a low-protein and high-starch diet was not suitable for grass carp. This finding is in agreement with earlier works (Jin et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018).

To elucidate the metabolic response of grass carp to dietary P/E ratios, a hepatic transcriptome analysis was conducted comparing groups fed P/E 21.7 and P/E 29.2 diets. Pathway enrichment analysis (KEGG and GO) identified the AMPK signaling pathway as the most significantly enriched cluster among DEGs (Supplementary Table S1). The AMPK signaling pathway is known to play an important role in the regulation of energy metabolic pathways in fish (Wu et al., 2016). Several genes were up-regulated in the P/E 29.2 group, including fatty acid synthase (fasn), which is an important rate-limiting enzyme involved in the lipogenesis pathway (Zheng et al., 2013), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (scd), which catalyzes the insertion of a cis double bond at the delta-9 position into fatty acyl-CoA substrates, glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit 1b (g6pc1b), which hydrolyzes glucose-6-phosphate to glucose in the endoplasmic reticulum, and Ras-related protein Rab-2A (rab2a), which modulates the liver lipid accumulation (Morohoshi et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022). However, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1Ab (cpt1ab, a marker gene of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation) and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 1 (pfkfb1), which are involved in the synthesis and degradation of fructose 2,6-bisphosphate, were down-regulated in the P/E 29.2 group. These expression patterns indicate that the P/E 21.7 diet suppressed lipogenesis and enhanced lipolysis to mitigate lipid accumulation, while simultaneously promoting glycolysis-driven de novo lipogenesis, which elevated hepatic TG content. This paradoxical metabolic shift aligns with the observation of increased TG content in the liver. Similar energy metabolism results were observed in Amur sturgeon Acipenser schrenckii after feeding them a low-protein, high-starch diet (Zhang et al., 2023). In addition to lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, the DEGs were also enriched in other GO terms such as organic acid metabolic process, carboxylic acid metabolic process, oxoacid metabolic process, and monocarboxylic acid metabolic process.

The Ras signaling pathway was the second largest cluster of DEG enrichment in KEGG pathways. As a core regulatory mechanism governing proliferation, survival, growth, differentiation, and inflammation, this pathway exhibited significant upregulation of key genes in the P/E 29.2 group (Wennerberg et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2002; Shaker et al., 2023). The expression of Ras signaling pathway-related genes such as Ras-related protein Ral-A-like (rala), which is involved in a variety of cellular processes including gene expression, cell migration, and proliferation (Cascone et al., 2008; Balasubramanian et al., 2010; Hiatt et al., 2018), phospholipase C, epsilon 1 (plce1), which participates in multiple signaling pathways affecting cell survival, cell growth, actin organization, and T-cell activation (Bunney and Katan, 2006; Abdou et al., 2022), ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (ralgds, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor activating either RalA or RalB GTPases and playing a crucial role in intracellular transport), colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, alpha (csf1ra), which plays an important role in innate immunity and inflammatory processes, and phospholipase A2 group 10 (pla2g10), which may be involved in maturation and activation of innate immune cells (Nolin et al., 2017), were up-regulated in the P/E 29.2 group. This coordinated upregulation suggests that an optimal dietary P/E ratio enhances growth performance and immune function. Furthermore, the up-regulated cytosolic phospholipase A2 gamma-like (pla2g4c) in the P/E 29.2 group, known to regulate endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis and lipid droplet formation (Hanasaki, 2002; Linkous and Yazlovitskaya, 2010; Su et al., 2017), indicates enhanced lipid homeostasis at an optimal dietary P/E ratio. Conversely, the down-regulation of angiopoietin-1-like (angpt1), which mediates endothelial–matrix interactions, is an unresolved aspect requiring further investigation (d'Apolito et al., 2019).

Arachidonic acid metabolism and ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes were also regulated by the dietary P/E ratio. The expression of arachidonic acid metabolism genes, such as pla2g10, pla2g4c, cytochrome P450 2J4-like (cyp2j4), which catalyzes the hydroxylation of carbon-hydrogen bonds (Zhang et al., 1997), gamma-glutamyltransferase 1 alpha (ggt1a), which is involved in arachidonic acid metabolism (Gong et al., 2024), and hydroperoxide isomerase ALOXE3-like, which oxygenates polyunsaturated fatty acids, was up-regulated in the P/E 29.2 group. These results indicate that a suitable dietary P/E ratio can increase fatty acid metabolism and enhance immune performance. The expression of ribosome biogenesis genes such as the GAR1 homolog, ribonucleoprotein (gar1), which is responsible for 18S rRNA production and rRNA pseudouridylation (Spaulding et al., 2022), the SNU13 homolog, small nuclear ribonucleoprotein b (snu13b, a component of the spliceosome and rRNA processing machinery); and the NOP58 ribonucleoprotein homolog (nop58), which is crucial for rRNA processing and assembly, were up-regulated in the P/E 29.2 group. Generally, the vigorous synthesis of rRNA indicates the demand for efficient and large-scale protein synthesis during cell proliferation. In the present study, the up-regulated genes involved in ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes may partly explain the increased growth performance in the group P/E 29.2.

5 Conclusion

The present study indicated that a dietary protein-to-energy (P/E) ratio of 29.2 was optimal for large-sized grass carp, as it maximized growth performance and health status, as evidenced by superior weight gain, favorable hematological parameters, and improved tissue histology and hepatic transcriptome profiles. At the transcriptional level, the optimal P/E ratio enhanced growth performance and immune function by interrupting the AMPK signaling pathway, the Ras signaling pathway, and arachidonic acid metabolism, in addition to affecting rRNA synthesis via regulating the ribosome biogenesis gene expression in eukaryotes. Based on the second-order polynomial regression analysis of the growth performance and health status against the P/E ratio, the optimal P/E range was found to be 27.36–28.93. These findings provide novel insights into the nutritional requirements of large-sized grass carp, offering valuable guidance for optimizing feed formulations to enhance aquaculture productivity.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Qiu G, Zhou X, and Guo C for their kind help in the feeding experiments and sampling. The authors are also grateful to Cui K, Zhang W, Cui X, and Ma H for their kind help with the study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project (2023ZD04065).

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved under the Management Rule of Laboratory Animals (Chinese Order No. 676 of the State Council, revised 1 March 2017). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

ZL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. LW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. BY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. XD: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. FN: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. JW: Writing – review and editing, Validation. XQ: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. XH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing.

Conflict of interest

Authors ZL, LW, BY, XD, FN, JW, and XQ were employed by Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1665511/full#supplementary-material

Image3.jpg (292.9KB, jpg)
Image2.jpg (291.3KB, jpg)
Table1.docx (55.5KB, docx)
Image1.jpg (482.2KB, jpg)

References

  1. Abdou M., Ramadan A., El-Agamy B., El-Farsy M., Saleh E. (2022). Mutational analysis of phospholipase C epsilon 1 gene in Egyptian children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 23, 150. 10.1186/s43042-022-00353-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakke A., Glover C., Krogdahl A. (2011). “Feeding, digestion and absorption of nutrients,” in The multifunctional gut of fish. Editors Grossel M., Farrel A., Brauner C. (London: Academic Press Elsevier; ), 57–75. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balasubramanian N., Meier J., Scott D., Norambuena A., White M., Schwartz M. (2010). RalA-exocyst complex regulates integrin-dependent membrane raft exocytosis and growth signaling. Curr. Biol. 20, 75–79. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bunney T., Katan M. (2006). Phospholipase C epsilon: linking second messengers and small GTPases. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 640–648. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camargo M., Martinez C. (2007). Histopathology of gills, kidney and liver of a neotropical fish caged in an urban stream. Neotropical Ichthyol. 5, 327–336. 10.1590/s1679-62252007000300013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cascone I., Selimoglu R., Ozdemir C., Nery E., Yeaman C., White M., et al. (2008). Distinct roles of RalA and RalB in the progression of cytokinesis are supported by distinct RalGEFs. EMBO J. 27, 2375–2387. 10.1038/emboj.2008.166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Z., Sun Y., Wang Z., Hong J., Xu M., Zhang F., et al. (2022). Rab2A regulates the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease downstream of AMPK-TBC1D1 axis by stabilizing PPARγ. PLOS Biol. 20 (1), e3001522. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. d'Apolito M., Santacroce R., Colia A., Cordisco G., Maffione A., Margaglione M. (2019). Angiopoietin-1 haploinsufficiency affects the endothelial barrier and causes hereditary angioedema. Clin. Exp. Allergy 49, 626–635. 10.1111/cea.13349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong X., Qian X., Liu J., Chen J., Wang Z., Fan H., et al. (2019). Effects of dietary protein and wheat starch on growth and liver structure of grass carp, ctenopharyngodon idella . Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 43, 983–991. 10.7541/2019.117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Enes P., Panserat S., Kaushik S., Oliva-Teles A. (2009). Nutritional regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in fish. Fish Physiology Biochem. 35, 519–539. 10.1007/s10695-008-9259-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furné M., Hidalgo M., López A., García-Gallego M., Morales A., Domezain A., et al. (2005). Digestive enzyme activities in Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii and rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. A comparative study. Aquaculture 250, 391–398. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.05.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. García-Meilán I., Valentín J., Fontanillas R., Gallardo M. (2013). Different protein to energy ratio diets for gilthead sea bream (sparus aurata): effects on digestive and absorptive processes. Aquaculture 412-413, 1–7. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.06.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaye-Siessegger J., Focken U., Becker K. (2006). Effect of dietary protein/carbohydrate ratio on activities of hepatic enzymes involved in the amino acid metabolism of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Fish Physiology Biochem. 32, 275–282. 10.1007/s10695-006-9000-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonçalves A., Ha N., Biller-Takahashi J., Gimbo R., Urbinati E., Takahashi L. (2018). Dietary protein-to-carbohydrate ratios affect metabolism and growth of juvenile surubim cachara (Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum). Aquac. Int. 26, 349–362. 10.1007/s10499-017-0213-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gong H., Zhang B., Ji H. (2024). Functional and related research progress of γ-glutamyltransferase 1. J. Chin. Physician 26, 311–313. 10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20230316-00352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guo J., Wang L., Song K., Lu K., Li X., Zhang C. (2023). Physiological response of spotted seabass (Lateolabrax maculatus) to different dietary available phosphorus levels and water temperature: changes in growth, lipid metabolism, antioxidant status and intestinal microbiota. Antioxidants 12, 2128. 10.3390/antiox12122128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanasaki K., Yamada K., Yamamoto S., Ishimoto Y., Saiga A., Ono T., et al. (2002). Potent modification of low density lipoprotein by group X secretory phospholipase A2 is linked to macrophage foam cell formation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29116–29124. 10.1074/jbc.M202867200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiatt S., Neu M., Ramaker R., Hardigan A., Prokop J., Hancarova M., et al. (2018). De novo mutations in the GTP/GDP-binding region of RALA, a RAS-like small GTPase, cause intellectual disability and developmental delay. PLOS Genet. 14, e1007671. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang S., Wu X., Luo Y., Wu M., Lu S., Jin Z., et al. (2016). Optimal dietary protein level and protein to energy ratio for hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂) juveniles. Aquaculture 465, 28–36. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin Y., Tian L., Xie S., Guo D., Yang H., Liang G., et al. (2015). Interactions between dietary protein levels, growth performance, feed utilization, gene expression and metabolic products in juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture 437, 75–83. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.11.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamalam B., Medale F., Panserat S. (2017). Utilisation of dietary carbohydrates in farmed fishes: new insights on influencing factors, biological limitations and future strategies. Aquaculture 467, 3–27. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiron V., Watanabe T., Fukuda H., Okamoto N., Takeuchi T. (1995). Protein nutrition and defence mechanisms in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss . Comp. Biochem. Physiology A Physiology 111, 351–359. 10.1016/0300-9629(95)00043-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krogdahl A., Bakke-McKellep A., Baeverfjord G. (2003). Effects of graded levels of standard soybean meal on intestinal structure, mucosal enzyme activities, and pancreatic response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquac. Nutr. 9, 361–371. 10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00264.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee E., He F., Choi B., Dai W. (2002). Expression of IDO1 is regulated via ras signaling pathways. FASEB J. 36, S1–l7486. 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.l7486 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao Z., Cui X., Luo X., Ma Q., Wei Y., Liang M., et al. (2024). Exposure of farmed fish to petroleum hydrocarbon pollution and the recovery process: a simulation experiment with tiger puffer Takifugu rubripes . Sci. Total Environ. 913, 169743. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Linkous A., Yazlovitskaya E. (2010). Cytosolic phospholipase A2 as a mediator of disease pathogenesis. Cell. Microbiol. 12 (10), 1369–1377. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01505.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu G., Wang L., Yu H., Pan M., Yang M., Zhang W., et al. (2021). Effects of dietary protein levels on growth performance, digestibility, anti-oxidative responses and expressions of growth-related genes in triploid rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss farmed in seawater. Aquac. Nutr. 27, 998–1008. 10.1111/anu.13241 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu T., Weng X., Wang J., Han T., Wang Y., Chai X. (2023). Dietary protein requirement of juvenile dotted gizzard shad Konosirus punctatus based on the variation of fish meal. Animals 13, 788. 10.3390/ani13050788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McGoogan B., Gatlin D. (1999). Dietary manipulations affecting growth and nitrogenous waste production of red drum, sciaenops ocellatus: effects of dietary protein and energy levels. Aquaculture 178, 333–348. 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00137-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Meng Y., Ma R., Ma J., Han D., Xu W., Zhang W., et al. (2017). Dietary nucleotides improve the growth performance, antioxidative capacity and intestinal morphology of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquac. Nutr. 23, 585–593. 10.1111/anu.12425 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohapatra M., Sahu N., Chaudhari A. (2003). Utilization of gelatinized carbohydrate in diets of labeo rohita fry. Aquac. Nutr. 9, 189–196. 10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00243.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morohoshi A., Miyata H., Oyama Y., Oura S., Noda T., Ikawa M. (2021). FAM71F1 binds to RAB2A and RAB2B and is essential for acrosome formation and male fertility in mice. Development 148, 199644. 10.1242/dev.199644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. National Research Council (2011). Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. Washington, WA, USA: National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nolin J., Lai Y., Ogden H., Manicone A., Murphy R., An D., et al. (2017). Secreted PLA2 group X orchestrates innate and adaptive immune responses to inhaled allergen. JCI Insight 2 (21), e94929. 10.1172/jci.insight.94929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Péres A., Zambonino Infante J., Cahu C. (1998). Dietary regulation of activities and mRNA levels of trypsin and amylase in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Fish Physiology Biochem. 19, 145–152. 10.1023/A:1007775501340 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pérez-Jiménez A., Abellán E., Arizcun M., Cardenete G., Morales A., Hidalgo M. (2015). Nutritional and metabolic responses in common dentex (Dentex dentex) fed on different types and levels of carbohydrates. Comp. Biochem. Physiology, Part A 184, 56–64. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shaker M., Rokni M., Mahmoudi M., Farhadi E. (2023). Ras family signaling pathway in immunopathogenesis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Front. Immunol. 14, 1151246. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Silva T., Zanon R., Mourão G., Cyrino J. (2020). Digestible energy, protein, and energy–protein ratio requirements of Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum. J. World Aquac. Soc. 51, 1402–1418. 10.1111/jwas.12701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Spaulding E., Feidler A., Cook L., Updike D. (2022). RG/RGG repeats in the C. elegans homologs of nucleolin and GAR1 contribute to sub-nucleolar phase separation. Nat. Commun. 13, 6585. 10.1038/s41467-022-34225-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Su X., Liu S., Zhang X., Lam S., Hu X., Zhou Y., et al. (2017). Requirement of cytosolic phospholipase A2 gamma in lipid droplet formation. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1862 (7), 692–705. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sun S., Wu Y., Yu H., Su Y., Ren M., Zhu J., et al. (2019). Serum biochemistry, liver histology and transcriptome profiling of bighead carp Aristichthys nobilis following different dietary protein levels. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 86, 832–839. 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.12.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Taj S., Han Q., Wu X., Yin H., Tian L., Yang H., et al. (2023). Effects of dietary protein-to-energy ratios on growth, immune response, antioxidative capacity, liver and intestinal histology, and growth-related gene expression in hybrid yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco ♀ × Pelteobagrus vachelli ♂). Aquac. Nutr. 2023, 9106332. 10.1155/2023/9106332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tian L., Liu Y., Yang H., Liang G., Niu J. (2012). Effects of different dietary wheat starch levels on growth, feed efficiency and digestibility in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquac. Int. 20, 283–293. 10.1007/s10499-011-9456-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang Z., Wang K., Deng J., Zhang L., Mi H., Chen X. (2018). Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels with different protein-to-energy ratios on growth, feed utilization, and plasma biochemical parameters of dianchi golden-line barbell, Sinocyclocheilus grahami . J. World Aquac. Soc. 49, 867–876. 10.1111/jwas.12486 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wennerberg K., Rossman K., Der C. (2005). The ras superfamily at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 118 (5), 843–846. 10.1242/jcs.01660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu K., Huang C., Shi X., Chen F., Xu Y., Pan Y., et al. (2016). Role and mechanism of the AMPK pathway in waterborne Zn exposure influencing the hepatic energy metabolism of Synechogobius hasta . Sci. Rep. 6, 38716. 10.1038/srep38716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu L., Liang H., Hamunjo C., Ge X., Ji K., Yu H., et al. (2021). Culture salinity alters dietary protein requirement, whole body composition and nutrients metabolism related genes expression in juvenile genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT) (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 531, 735961. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735961 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu J., Wu P., Jiang W., Liu Y., Jiang J., Kuang S., et al. (2016). Optimal dietary protein level improved growth, disease resistance, intestinal immune and physical barrier function of young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 55, 64–87. 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ye C., Wu Y., Sun Z., Wang A. (2017). Dietary protein requirement of juvenile obscure puffer, Takifugu obscurus . Aquac. Res. 48, 2064–2073. 10.1111/are.13040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yu H., Liang H., Ren M., Ge X., Ji K., Huang D., et al. (2022). A study to explore the effects of low dietary protein levels on the growth performance and nutritional metabolism of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) fry. Aquaculture 546, 737324. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737324 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zehra S., Khan M. (2012). Dietary protein requirement for fingerling Channa punctatus (bloch), based on growth, feed conversion, protein retention and biochemical composition. Aquac. Int. 20, 383–395. 10.1007/s10499-011-9470-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Q., Ding X., Kaminsky L. (1997). cDNA cloning, heterologous expression, and characterization of rat intestinal CYP2J4. Archives Biochem. Biophysics 340, 270–278. 10.1006/abbi.1997.9922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang X., Zhu Y., Wei H., Gu X., Wu X., Xue M., et al. (2023). Effects of low-protein-high-starch diet on growth performance, glucose and lipid metabolism of Amur sturgeon (Acipenser schrenckii) during feeding and starvation phases. Aquaculture 562, 738739. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738739 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao W., Guo Y., Yao R., Chen A., Chen B., Niu J. (2023). Protein requirements of Oncorhynchus mykiss cultured in the convection-water cages by evaluating growth, body composition and liver health. Foods 12, 175. 10.3390/foods12010175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao J., Liu Y., Sun Z., Wang L., Fan Z., Pan Y., et al. (2024). Effects of different levels of carbohydrates on growth performance, hepatic and intestinal health, and intestinal microflora of juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquac. Nutr. 2024, 8450154. 10.1155/2024/8450154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zheng J., Lu Z., Zhu Q., Tan X., Chen Q., Sun L., et al. (2013). Molecular cloning and expression pattern of 11 genes involved in lipid metabolism in yellow catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco . Gene 531, 53–63. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Image3.jpg (292.9KB, jpg)
Image2.jpg (291.3KB, jpg)
Table1.docx (55.5KB, docx)
Image1.jpg (482.2KB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.


Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES