Skip to main content
Porto Biomedical Journal logoLink to Porto Biomedical Journal
. 2025 Nov 12;10(6):e306. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000306

A retrospective study of the epidemiological and clinical profile of snakebites in an aspirational district of Karnataka

Dodda Basava Janekunte a, Ravindranath Mavinkatti b, Chandan Nagendraswamy a,*, Arti Birajdar a, Josna Johnson a, Kalesh M Karun a, Phaniraj Vastrad c,d, Manish J Barvaliya a
PMCID: PMC12604649  PMID: 41230250

Abstract

Background:

Snakebite envenoming is a critical public health issue, recognized as the second-deadliest neglected tropical disease by the World Health Organization. In India, it accounts for an estimated 35,000 to 50,000 deaths annually, exacerbated by reliance on traditional remedies and underreporting of fatalities. This retrospective study analyzes the epidemiological and clinical profiles of snakebite cases at a secondary care hospital in Karnataka.

Methods:

Snakebite cases reported from January 2020 to April 2023 were analyzed. Data on demographics, clinical manifestations, treatments, complications, and outcomes were collected using case record forms. Descriptive statistics were applied using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0.

Results:

A total of 366 snakebite cases were reported, of which 121 (33.1%) were classified as venomous bites. The common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) was the most frequently identified species. The mean age of victims was 29.50 ± 14.62 years, and men (58.2%) were more frequently affected. Most bites occurred in the morning (51.9%), and 33.3% of victims sought traditional treatment before arriving at the hospital. Among all cases, 78.4% showed improvement, 16.7% were referred to higher centers, 3.3% left against medical advice, and 1.6% succumbed to complications.

Conclusions:

Snakebite remains a major public health concern in India, particularly among young males. Neurotoxic envenoming, predominantly due to the common krait, was most common in this study area. The frequent use of traditional medicine before seeking medical care underscores the need for community education and early referral to health care facilities. Strengthening awareness, timely administration of antisnake venom, and improved documentation are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality from snakebites.

Keywords: clinical profile, epidemiology, snakebite envenoming, traditional medicine

Introduction

Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a critical public health concern and is recognized as the second deadliest among neglected tropical diseases (NTDs).1 In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) redesignated snakebite as an NTD, reversing its removal in 2013. This decision was influenced by the overwhelming burden of snakebites in tropical and subtropical regions, which account for 95% of the global caseload.2 WHO's strategy emphasizes community engagement to prevent snakebites and improved training for health care workers to ensure prompt and effective treatment.3 Despite these global measures, SBE remains an overlooked issue in public health systems, particularly in rural and underserved regions.

The statistics surrounding SBE illustrate its devastating impact. Globally, snakebites affect approximately 4.5–5.4 million people annually, with 1.8–2.7 million experiencing envenomation. This results in an estimated 81,000 to 138,000 deaths and leaves approximately 400,000 survivors with lifelong disabilities, including amputations, disfigurements, and psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder.4,5 These numbers reveal the immense strain SBE places on health care systems and the urgent need for scalable prevention and treatment strategies.

India bears the largest burden of SBE globally, with an estimated 35,000 to 50,000 deaths annually due to snakebites. However, underreporting remains a significant challenge. For instance, in 2007, official reports recorded only 1,331 snakebite deaths a gross underrepresentation likely caused by inadequate data collection systems.6 This discrepancy highlights the need for improved documentation and reporting mechanisms to understand the true magnitude of the problem. Moreover, reliance on traditional remedies in rural areas further complicates the management of snakebites, delaying access to lifesaving medical care.7-9

The lack of reliable data hinders public health professionals from designing effective interventions for snakebite prevention and treatment.10 Epidemiological studies on SBE in India are typically conducted in tertiary care settings, leaving critical gaps in understanding the burden at secondary and primary healthcare levels.11 Karnataka is one of India's states with a significant rural population, there is a lack of data on snakebite incidents. This gap is particularly concerning given the state's diverse topography, which includes areas with a high prevalence of venomous snake species. A retrospective data analysis is useful for assessing the burden and trends of diseases when there is a lack of robust data. Moreover, it can also provide insight into gaps in health care which helps in improving health care practices. A retrospective record-based study was planned to analyze the epidemiological and clinical profiles of suspected snakebite cases and to assess treatment outcomes at a secondary care facility in Karnataka, where the majority of snakebite cases in the region are being treated.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This record-based, retrospective, descriptive study was conducted at the Hutti Gold Mines Hospital, affiliated with the Hutti Gold Mines Company Limited, located in Lingasugur Taluk of Raichur District, Karnataka, India. Raichur is one of the aspirational districts identified under the Government of India's Aspirational Districts Programme, aimed at improving key indicators in health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure.

The Hutti Gold Mines Hospital is a secondary care facility with 120 beds, providing health care services to employees of the company and nearby rural populations at nominal cost. The hospital is staffed by 12 doctors, including specialists, and supported by 125 health care personnel. It serves as a referral centre for snakebite cases from surrounding villages.

Data source

Data on snakebite cases treated between January 2020 and April 2023 were obtained from the hospital's Medical Records Department.

Data collection procedure

Data were collected using a predesigned case record form by trained data collectors. Medical case sheets were reviewed to obtain relevant details. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with the investigators, and further clarification was sought from treating physicians when necessary.

Information extracted included demographic details (age, gender, and location of the incident), species of snake (when identified), time interval between bite and hospital arrival, bite site and timing, prior use of traditional medicine, and clinical manifestations (local, neurotoxic, or hemotoxic). Snake identification was based on either the dead snake brought to the hospital or photographs shown to the treating physician.

Laboratory findings, including 20-minute Whole Blood Clotting Test (WBCT), serum creatinine, clotting time, and urea levels, were recorded. Treatments such as anti-snake venom (ASV), atropine, neostigmine, intravenous fluids, and antibiotics were documented. Patient outcomes were noted as per the medical records, acknowledging that some variables had missing data.

Ethical considerations

No identifiable patient information was collected. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of MRHRU, Sirwar, and ICMR-NITM (ICMR-NITM/IHEC/2023-MAR/019), Belagavi, along with a consent waiver. The research adhered to the National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants as outlined by the ICMR in 2017.

Data analysis

The collected data were entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed using IBM SPSS v25.0. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were applied to summarize the data. The results were presented in tables and graphs for effective communication of findings. Treatment complications and outcomes were classified into categories: neurotoxic, hemotoxic, nonvenomous, and unclassified snakebite cases.

Results

This study included a total of 366 snakebite cases reported between January 2020 and April 2023. The snake species was identified in 130 cases (35.5%), while in 236 cases (64.5%), the species could not be determined. Based on clinical signs and symptoms of envenomation, 121 of the identified cases were caused by venomous snakes, and 9 cases were caused by nonvenomous snakes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Basic demographic details of snakebite victims*

Basic demographic details
Variable Mean (SD)
Age in years (n = 366) 29.50 (14.62)
Variables Frequency (%)
Age categories (years)
 Younger than 18 90 (24.6)
 18–49 237 (64.8)
 Older than 50 39 (10.7)
Duration of hospital stay in days (n = 360) 2.72 (3.6)
Gender (n = 366)
 Male 213 (58.2)
 Female 153 (41.8)
Place of snakebite (n = 26)
 Field 16 (4.5)
 Home 10 (2.7)
The type of snake identified (n = 130)
 Neurotoxic
  Cobra 21 (5.7)
  Krait 73 (19.9)
 Hemotoxic
  Russell's viper 9 (2.5)
  Saw scaled viper 18 (4.9)
 Nonvenomous
  Rat snake 09 (2.4)
Site of bite (n = 194)
 Hand 35 (9.5)
 Foot and Leg 156 (42.6)
Any other
 Left Chest 1 (0.3)
 Lip 1 (0.3)
 Nose 1 (0.3)
Time of bite (n = 364)
 Morning 190 (51.9)
 Afternoon 96 (26.2)
 Evening 69 (18.9)
 Night 9 (2.5)
Traditional medicine used (n = 122) 122 (33.3)
Traditional medicine details (n = 122)
 Ayurvedic treatment 3 (0.8)
 Herbal medicine 113 (30.8)
 Holy water 6 (1.6)
Time interval in hours between the snake bite and visiting the hospital
Min: 1, Max: 360 Median (Q1, Q3): 4 (2, 9)
Duration of hospital stay (n = 360) (d)
Min: 1, Max: 42 Median (Q1, Q3): 2 (1, 3)
*

Some data were not mentioned for all cases in the case record

The mean age of victims was 29.5 ± 14.6 years, with most (64.8%) aged between 18–49 years. Males constituted 58.2% of cases. Most snakebites occurred in the morning (51.9%). The lower extremities were the most common bite sites (42.6%).

Species identification revealed that the common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) was the predominant species (19.9%), followed by the Indian cobra (Naja naja) (5.7%), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) (4.9%), and Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) (2.5%). Traditional medicine use was noted in 33.3% of cases, predominantly herbal preparations (30.8%), before arrival at the hospital. The median time from bite to hospital admission was 4 hours (inter quartile range: 2–9).

As shown in Table 2, the most frequent local manifestations were swelling (48.1%) and pain (42.9%). Ptosis (17.2%) was the most common neurotoxic symptom, followed by paralysis (11.5%), while ecchymosis (6.6%) was the most frequent hemotoxic symptom.

Table 2.

Distribution of symptoms of snakebite envenomation in the study

Variables (n = 366) Frequency (%)
Local manifestations
 Swelling at the Bite site 176 (48.1)
 Pain at the Bite site 157 (42.9)
 Blistering 11 (3.0)
 Local necrosis 16 (4.4)
Neurotoxic Symptoms
 Paralysis 42 (11.5)
 Ptosis 63 (17.2)
 Diplopia 02 (0.5)
 Dysarthria 12 (3.3)
 Dyspnoea 13 (3.6)
 Dysphagia 05 (1.4)
Hemotoxic symptoms
 Bleeding at the bite site 14 (3.8)
 Ecchymosis 24 (6.6)
 Systemic bleeding 04 (1.1)
 Petechiae purpura 03 (0.8)

Among the tested cases, 21.6% had unclotted blood on 20-minute WBCT, 7.1% showed elevated serum creatinine (>1.3 mg/dL), and 22.1% had prolonged clotting time (>15 minutes). All snakebite cases had bleeding times within the normal range, and 4.6% of cases had urea levels exceeding 40 mg/dL (Table 3).

Table 3.

Laboratory findings among snakebite victims

Variables Frequency (%)
20 minute WBCT (At the time of admission) (n = 282)
 Clotted 203 (55.5)
 Not clotted 79 (21.6)
Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) (n = 224)
 Less than 1.3 198 (54.0)
 More than 1.3 26 (7.1)
Clotting time (min) (n = 294)
 Less than 15min 213 (58.1)
 More than 15min 81 (22.13)
Blood urea (mg/dL) (n = 233)
 More than 40 17 (4.6)

The highest number of snakebite cases occurred during the monsoon months, peaking in June (56 cases) and July (55 cases), while the lowest cases was reported in May (12 cases) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Month-wise distribution of snakebite cases reported between January 2020 and April 2023.

Amongst 94 cases of neurotoxic snakebite, 95.7% received ASV, whereas in the remaining 4.25% cases ASV details were not available in the case sheets. Atropine was given in 48.94% and neostigmine in 46.81% cases. All cases received intravenous (IV) fluids, and 98.94% cases received IV antibiotics. Intubation was required in thirteen cases. Two cases each of compartment syndrome and gangrene, and three of coagulopathy were noted. Overall, 83% of neurotoxic cases improved, 6.4% were referred, and 2.1% died (Table 4).

Table 4.

Treatment, outcomes, and complications among snakebite victims

Variables Neurotoxic (n = 94)* Hemotoxic (n = 27)* Non-venomous (n = 9)* Unclassified snakebites (n = 236)*
Treatment given
 ASV (n = 332) 90 (95.74) 26 (96.30) 6 (66.67) 210 (88.98)
 Atropine (n = 69) 46 (48.94) 1 (3.70) 0 (0.00) 22 (9.32)
 Neostigmine (n = 68) 44 (46.81) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 24 (10.17)
 IV Fluids (n = 362) 94 (100.00) 26 (96.30) 9 (100.00) 233 (98.73)
 Antibiotic (n = 359) 93 (98.94) 27 (100.00) 8 (88.89) 231 (97.88)
 Fasciotomy (n = 20) 0 (0.00) 20 (74.07) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
 Skin grafting (n = 2) 0 (0.00) 2 (7.41) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Intubation duration (h)
 Up to 12 h (n = 9) 3 (3.19) 1 (3.70) 0 (0.00) 5 (2.12)
 Up to 24 h (n = 12) 7 (7.45) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 5 (2.12)
 Up to 48 h (n = 3) 3 (3.19) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Complications
 Systemic bleeding (n = 4) 0 (0.00) 4 (14.81) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
 Compartment syndrome (n = 19) 2 (2.13) 2 (7.41) 0 (0.00) 15 (6.36)
 Gangrene (n = 8) 2 (2.13) 2 (7.41) 0 (0.00) 4 (1.69)
 Coagulopathy (n = 79) 3 (3.19) 18 (66.67) 0 (0.00) 58 (24.58)
 Serum creatinine >1.3mg/dl (n = 26) 0 (0.00) 26 (96.30) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Outcome
 Improved (n = 287) 78 (83.02) 21 (77.78) 6 (66.67) 182 (77.12)
 Referred (n = 26) 6 (6.38) 1 (3.70) 1 (11.11) 18 (7.63)
 DAMA (n = 2) 2 (2.13) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
 Dead (n = 2) 2 (2.13) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
*

The values in the columns are frequency (column percentage).

Discharged against medical advice.

Among 27 hemotoxic snakebite cases, 26 (96.30%) cases received ASV. Fasciotomy was performed in 20 (74.07%) cases because of compartment syndrome. One patient required intubation for up to 12 hours. Hemotoxic snakebites were frequently linked to coagulopathy, affecting 18 (66.7%) cases, while other complications included gangrene and compartment syndrome in 2 (7.41%) cases each. Serum creatinine levels greater than 1.3 mg/dL were reported in 26 (96.30%) cases, and there was no documentation of haemodialysis requirements for patients with acute kidney injury in the case sheets. Improvement was noted in 21 (77.8%) cases. Among the nonvenomous snakebite cases (n = 9), all received supportive treatment, including IV fluids, and 8 (88.9%) received antibiotics. A total of 6 (66.7%) cases received ASV. These 6 cases were given ASV due to a misidentification of the snake before arriving at the hospital, which was later identified as a nonvenomous rat snake. In 236 unclassified snakebite cases, ASV was administered in 210 (88.98%) cases, and antibiotics were given to 231 (97.88%), although the specific species causing envenomation were not documented in the medical records. Five patients required intubation for durations of up to 12 and 24 hours, respectively. For complications like gangrene, documentation was lacking for the intervention performed, including the amputation. The 77.1% unclassified cases showed recovery (Table 4). The outcomes of the referred and discharge against medical advises cases were not recorded.

Overall, raised serum creatinine levels (>1.3 mg/dL) was the most common complication seen in 7.1% cases, primarily observed with hemotoxic snakebites. Coagulopathy was the most common complication in 21.6% cases. Compartment syndrome was documented in 5.2% cases, and fasciotomy was performed in 5.5% cases. Systemic bleeding occurred in 1.1% cases, while gangrene was observed in 2.2% cases.

Discussion

This retrospective analysis provides insights into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management gaps in snakebite cases. The mean age of victims (29.5 ± 14.6 years) aligns with previous studies, such as David et al (2012) (32 ± 15.9 years), Gajbhiye et al (2019) (33.2 ± 1.2 years), and Kalantri et al (2006) (33 ± 12 years). Male predominance (58.2%) was slightly lower compared with Kalantri et al (2006) (67.9%) and Chakraborty et al (2020) (74.4%), but similar to Patel et al (2021) (60.5%).1216

Geographical variations in snake species prevalence were evident, with Common kraits, (B. caeruleus) (19.9%) being the most frequently identified, compared with Chakraborty et al (2020), where Russell's vipers accounted for 58.04%. Most bites (42.6%) occurred on the lower extremities, comparable with studies done by Gajbhiye et al (2019) (63.5%) and David et al (2012) (71.7%). Variability in timing was observed, with 51.9% occurring in the morning, contrasting with Chakraborty et al (2020) (57.94% in the evening) and Mandal et al (2021) (71.96% at night), likely reflecting regional occupational patterns. Notably, 33.3% of victims sought traditional medicine before hospital care, in line with Alcoba et al (2020) (38%) but lower than Vongphoumy et al (2015) (100%) and Snow et al (1994) (78%), contributing to delayed ASV administration and poorer outcomes, reflecting the faith in traditional medicine and the availability of doctors and ASV.1,7,12,13,15,1719

Local manifestations included swelling (48.1%) and pain (42.9%), similar to Melit et al (2021) (91.6%) but higher than Bawaskar et al (2008) (21.9%) studies. Neurotoxic symptoms such as ptosis (17.2%) and paralysis (11.5%) were lower than Mandal et al (2021) (75.7% ptosis) and David et al (2012) (62.3% ptosis) studies. Compared with Ghosh et al (2018), where gangrene occurred in 14.8% and renal failure in 9%, our study showed a lower incidence. ASV was administered to 90.7% of patients, slightly higher than Karanth et al (2023) (84.6%), with no recorded adverse reactions.6,12,17,2023

Overall, 78.4% of patients improved, lower than Mandal et al (2021) (96.2%). Improvement rates were higher in neurotoxic (83.02%) and hemotoxic (77.8%) cases compared with nonvenomous and unclassified cases (67% and 77.1%, respectively). Referral was required in 7.1% of cases, and mortality was 0.5%, though causes of death were often undocumented. Late presentation and reliance on traditional medicine likely contributed to poorer prognoses. Strengthening early recognition, adherence to standardized ASV protocols, and improved record-keeping are essential for optimizing snakebite management outcomes.17

Limitations

As this study was conducted in a single hospital, the results may not be generalizable to other settings. Some of the information was incomplete, which made it difficult to analyze certain patterns fully and reduced the number of participants included in the analysis. Since the study relied on existing records, the accuracy of the findings depended on how well the data were originally collected and documented, and any errors or inconsistencies may have contributed to the gaps. The missing data may also have introduced bias if the cases excluded due to incomplete information were different from those included, potentially affecting how well the results apply to a broader population. As a single value of serum creatinine was available in case sheets it was insufficient to attribute it to SBE.

Recommendations

To improve clinical outcomes for snakebite patients, especially in rural facilities, healthcare professionals should receive regular training on standardized snakebite management protocols. Community awareness campaigns are essential to reduce dependence on traditional healers and promote timely hospital care. Enhancing knowledge of ASV availability and improving hospital data recording systems will support evidence-based decision-making and policy planning, ultimately strengthening the overall health care system's capacity to respond effectively to snakebite incidents.

Conclusion

Snakebite envenomation remains a major public health issue in this aspirational district of Karnataka, predominantly affecting young adults. Many victims initially seek traditional healers, delaying effective treatment. Most bites occur during the monsoon season, with the common krait as the most frequently involved species. Common symptoms included local swelling, pain, and ptosis. Strengthening early treatment access, awareness, and hospital documentation can substantially reduce morbidity and mortality.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Subarna Roy, Scientist-G & Director, ICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine for continuous support and critical inputs for the manuscript. We thank Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India for continued support. We thank Mrs. Vijaya Shanthi, Medical Record Keeper, Hutti Gold Mines Hospital, Hutti for providing the medical records which are used in the study. We also thank Mr Devaraju Thirupathi, Mr Naveen M R, Dr Poonam Kholiya, Ms Muskan Ghori, Mr Akash Kamble and Ms Tejaswini N Doddamata for helping in data collection.

Assistance with the study: None.

The study was funded by intramural funding of Model Rural Health Research Unit (MRHRU), Sirwar, Karnataka, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research (DHR), New Delhi, India.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability: The data will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Dodda Basava J], [Chandan N] and [Ravindra Mavinkatti]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Dodda Basava J], [Ravindra Mavinkatti], [Chandan N], [Arti Birajdar], and [Josna Johnson] and Conceptualization and finalization of draft reviewed by [Phaniraj Vastrad] and Conceptualization, data review and finalization of draft reviewed by [Manish Barvaliya] all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Dodda Basava Janekunte, Email: rohitbasavaraj99@gmail.com.

Ravindranath Mavinkatti, Email: drravimavinkatti@gmail.com.

Chandan Nagendraswamy, Email: chandan.n@icmr.gov.in.

Arti Birajdar, Email: aartibirajdar4@gmail.com.

Josna Johnson, Email: drjosna111@gmail.com.

Kalesh M. Karun, Email: karunkmk@gmail.com.

Phaniraj Vastrad, Email: pm.vastrad@gmail.com.

Manish J. Barvaliya, Email: drmanishbarvaliya@gmail.com.

References

  • [1].Alcoba G, Ochoa C, Babo Martins S, et al. Novel transdisciplinary methodology for cross-sectional analysis of snakebite epidemiology at national scale. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(2):e0009023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Chippaux JP. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2017;23:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Minghui R, Malecela MN, Cooke E, Abela-Ridder B. WHO's snakebite envenoming strategy for prevention and control. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(7):e837–e838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis primers. 2017;3(1):17063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Chippaux JP. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analytic approach. Toxicon. 2011;57(4):586–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Ghosh R, Mana K, Gantait K, Sarkhel S. A retrospective study of clinico-epidemiological profile of snakebite related deaths at a tertiary care hospital in Midnapore, West Bengal, India. Toxicol Rep. 2018;5:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Snow RW, Bronzan R, Roques T, Nyamawi C, Murphy S, Marsh K. The prevalence and morbidity of snake bite and treatment-seeking behaviour among a rural Kenyan population. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1994;88(6):665–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Chippaux JP. Snakebite epidemiology in Benin (West Africa). Toxicon. 1988;27:37. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Warrell DA. Snake bite. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375(9708):77–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, et al. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, et al. , Million Death Study Collaborators. Snakebite mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].David S, Matathia S, Christopher S. Mortality predictors of snake bite envenomation in southern India—A ten-year retrospective audit of 533 patients. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(2):118–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Gajbhiye R, Khan S, Kokate P, et al. Incidence & management practices of snakebite: a retrospective study at Sub-District Hospital, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(4):412–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Kalantri S, Singh A, Joshi R, et al. Clinical predictors of in‐hospital mortality in patients with snake bite: a retrospective study from a rural hospital in central India. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(1):22–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Maity S, Chakraborty S, Banerjee P, Hazra R, Banerjee S, Sarkar N. A retrospective study on snakebite and its outcome from a referral-cum-teaching hospital of Kolkata, India. Saudi J Health Sci. 2020;9(2):130–135. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Patel S, Patel A, Ganjiwale J, Patel D, Nimbalkar S. The study of clinical profile and outcome of patients with snakebite in a rural community. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(4):1661–1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Mandal RK, Dangol B, Shah R, Sonkar S. A retrospective study on snake bites in a tertiary care Center in mid Western Nepal. Int J Adv Res Innovat Ideas Educ. 2021;7(3):2650–2656. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Vongphoumy I, Phongmany P, Sydala S, Prasith N, Reintjes R, Blessmann J. Snakebites in two rural districts in Lao PDR: community-based surveys disclose high incidence of an invisible public health problem. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(6):e0003887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Schioldann E, Mahmood MA, Kyaw MM, et al. Why do snakebite patients in Myanmar seek traditional healers despite the availability of biomedical care at hospitals? Community perspectives on reasons. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH, Punde DP, Inamdar MK, Dongare RB, Bhoite RR. Profile of snakebite envenoming in rural Maharashtra, India. J Assoc Phys India. 2008;56:88–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Karanth JB, Maribashetti K, Karanth G. Clinico-Epidemiological Study done at a tertiary care centre in Western ghats of South India and outcome of snakebite cases. Int J Tropical Dis Health. 2023;44(18):33–39. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Alcoba G, Chabloz M, Eyong J, et al. Snakebite epidemiology and health-seeking behavior in Akonolinga health district, Cameroon: cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(6):e0008334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Melit RJ Abraham SV Radhakrishnan S, et al. Retrospective review of case records of snakebite presenting to a single tertiary care centre over a 5-year period. Natl Med J India. 2021;34(6):326–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Porto Biomedical Journal are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto

RESOURCES