Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1991 Oct;178:101–113.

The uterine response in pregnant inbred and non-inbred rats.

J Matthews 1, S Peel 1
PMCID: PMC1260538  PMID: 1839792

Abstract

Comparisons were made between fetal, placental and metrial gland weights and the cellular composition of the placentae and metrial glands of pregnant inbred (Agus), outbred (Agus x Wistar) and random-bred (Wistar) rats. Fetal and placental weight differences between inbred and outbred rats provided evidence of hybrid vigour. Metrial gland weight differences between inbred and outbred rats showed that the Agus mothers responded to hybrid (Agus x Wistar) fetuses by producing heavier metrial glands than if they were carrying inbred fetuses, up to and included Day 18 of pregnancy. Histological examination revealed some differences between the 3 groups of rats at corresponding stages of pregnancy. Granulated metrial gland (GMG) cells formed a larger proportion of cells in the metrial gland in Agus rats carrying hybrid fetuses than in Agus rats carrying inbred fetuses up to Day 14 of pregnancy, but the situation was reversed after Day 14. Degenerative changes were more apparent in the metrial glands from Agus rats carrying hybrid fetuses than in rats from the other 2 groups from Day 15 of pregnancy onwards. Clusters of lymphocytes were a prominent feature of the placental labyrinths of Agus rats (mated with Agus or Wistar males) around Day 15 of pregnancy. Examination of single cell suspensions of metrial gland showed variations in the proportion of immunoglobulin G (Fc gamma) receptor bearing cells during pregnancy and between rats in the 3 groups of corresponding stages of pregnancy. The significance of the differences occurring in the metrial gland during pregnancy and between the groups at corresponding stages of pregnancy may be related to the functional involvement of GMG cells in cytotoxic activity directed against placental trophoblast.

Full text

PDF
101

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beer A. E., Scott J. R., Billingham R. E. Histoincompatibility and maternal immunological status as determinants of fetoplacental weight and litter size in rodents. J Exp Med. 1975 Jul 1;142(1):180–196. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.1.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bray J., Craggs R. The characterisation of Fc receptors on cells from the metrial gland of the pregnant rat uterus. J Reprod Immunol. 1979 Jul;1(2):109–115. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(79)90011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bray J., Stewart I., Craggs R. The demonstration of cells bearing Fc receptors in the metrial gland of the pregnant rat uterus. Cell Tissue Res. 1978 Aug 25;192(1):89–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00231025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craggs R. I., Peel S. Immunological characterisation of surface receptors on rat metrial gland cells. J Reprod Immunol. 1983 Jan;5(1):27–37. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(83)90018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dickson A. D., Krcek J. P. Numbers of metrial gland cells in the maternal placental supply and drainage vessels of Swiss Webster and C57B1 mice. J Anat. 1981 Dec;133(Pt 4):527–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton B. L., Hamilton M. S. Effect of maternal-fetal histoincompatibility on the weight of the feto-placental unit in mice: the role of minor histocompatibility antigens. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1987 Dec;15(4):153–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jbara K., Stewart I. Granulated metrial gland cells in the uterus and labyrinthine placenta of inbred and outbred pregnancies in mice. J Anat. 1982 Sep;135(Pt 2):311–317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kanbour-Shakir A., Kunz H. W., Gill T. J., 3rd, Armstrong D. T., Macpherson T. A. Morphologic changes in the rat uterus following natural mating and embryo transfer. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990 Jul;23(3):78–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1990.tb00676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MCLAREN A. GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON FOETAL AND PLACENTAL GROWTH IN MICE. J Reprod Fertil. 1965 Feb;9:79–98. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0090079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell B. S., Peel S. Identification of cells bearing leucocyte surface antigens in metrial gland tissue from rats of different gestational ages, strains or parities. Immunology. 1984 Sep;53(1):63–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mukhtar D. D., Stewart I. J., Croy B. A. Leucocyte membrane antigens on mouse granulated metrial gland cells. J Reprod Immunol. 1989 Jul;15(3):269–279. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(89)90017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peel S., Adam E. The killing of rat placental cells by rat and mouse granulated metrial gland cells in vitro. Placenta. 1991 Mar-Apr;12(2):161–171. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(91)90020-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peel S. Granulated metrial gland cells. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 1989;115:1–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-74170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peel S., Stewart I. J., Bulmer D. Experimental evidence for the bone marrow origin of granulated metrial gland cells of the mouse uterus. Cell Tissue Res. 1983;233(3):647–656. doi: 10.1007/BF00212232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peel S., Stewart I. Rat granulated metrial gland cells differentiate in pregnant chimeric mice and may be cytotoxic for mouse trophoblast. Cell Differ Dev. 1989 Oct;28(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/0922-3371(89)90023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart I. J. Granulated metrial gland cells in the mouse placenta. Placenta. 1990 May-Jun;11(3):263–275. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(05)80273-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart I. A morphological study of granulated metrial gland cells and trophoblast cells in the labyrinthine placenta of the mouse. J Anat. 1984 Dec;139(Pt 4):627–638. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stewart I., Mukhtar D. D. The killing of mouse trophoblast cells by granulated metrial gland cells in vitro. Placenta. 1988 Jul-Aug;9(4):417–425. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(88)90054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Surani M. A., Barton S. C., Norris M. L. Experimental reconstruction of mouse eggs and embryos: an analysis of mammalian development. Biol Reprod. 1987 Feb;36(1):1–16. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod36.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES