ABSTRACT
We report draft metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of six Rothia mucilaginosa strains recovered from the oral microbiome of distinct human subjects. MAGs were retrieved according to a species-specific genome mapping approach, displaying high average nucleotide identities (≥95.85%) to R. mucilaginosa ATCC 25296’s genome and minimal contamination levels (≤3.75%).
KEYWORDS: Rothia mucilaginosa, oral microbiome, human microbiome, saliva
ANNOUNCEMENT
The oral microbiome harbors a diverse bacterial community, with many members still warranting characterization at the strain level (1). Rothia are catalase-negative aerobic gram-positive bacilli of the Micrococcaceae family and commensals of the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract of humans (2). More specifically, Rothia mucilaginosa has been linked to oral conditions (3, 4) and may act as an opportunistic pathogen in systemic infections, including bacteremia (5), infective endocarditis (6, 7), peritonitis (8), septic arthritis (9), periprosthetic infections (10), and pneumonia (5). Furthermore, the incidence of R. mucilaginosa-associated complications appears to be rising, possibly as a reflection of the increased adoption of medical implants, although comprehensive epidemiological data remains lacking (6, 7). Here, we aimed at recovering and characterizing R. mucilaginosa metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from human saliva based on a species-directed mapping approach, in an effort to help unveil latent genetic traits critical to disease establishment and progression.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Amazonas State University (CAAE19521113.0.0000.5016). Twenty-seven volunteers were attended to at the Dental Clinic of the Amazonas State University (Brazil) with no distinction to gender, age, or ethnic background. All participants signed an informed consent adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). 1.0 mL non-stimulated saliva samples were collected with the OM-505 kit (DNA Genotek), submitted to nucleic acid extraction with the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification kit (Epicentre) coupled with lysozyme and proteinase K (Thermo Fisher, USA), and fragmented by hydrodynamic sonication. DNA fragments of approximately 300 bp were selected for sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform. To this end, 1.0 µg DNA was used for preparation of subject-specific libraries with the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions, yielding 150 bp paired-end reads. Read quality control was achieved with Novogene’s sequence trimming pipeline, ensuring Q30 ≥85%, and all downstream in silico analyses were performed with default software parameters. Reads were merged and adapter sequences excised with PEAR v.0.9.8, while host-related sequences were removed with Bowtie2 (11) by mapping to the GRCh38.p14 human data set (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000001405.40). Species-level read mapping to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)’s genome of R. mucilaginosa ATCC 25296 was performed with Bowtie2 (11). Contig assembly and MAGs binning were performed with SPADES v.3.15.5 (12) and Maxbin2. Completeness (50% minimum) and contamination (10% maximum) values were assessed with CheckM v.1.10.18 (13). Taxonomic placement of MAGs was achieved with GTDB-Tk v2.3.2 (14) within Kbase (15) adopting average nucleotide identity (ANI) scores of 95% and 97% for species and strain-level demarcation (16). Genome annotation was conducted with NCBI’s PGAP v.6.7, CARD 4.0.0 (17), and dbCAN3 (18).
A total of 43 MAGs were assembled from 4.79 × 108 raw reads. Among these, six genomes (retrieved from healthy individuals) met the quality standards and were chosen for taxonomic inference and gene annotation. They all displayed ANI values ≥ 95.85% to the reference genome and ≤96.54% among each other, representing distinct R. mucilaginosa strains. Overall, carbohydrate-binding modules, carbohydrate esterases, and glycosyl hydrolases/transferases were annotated. CRISPR arrays and DNA integrases/transposases were also unveiled, while Tn elements were absent. Antimicrobial drug resistance determinants were primarily found for macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, cephalosporins, phenicols, peptides, rifamycins, lincosamides, glycopeptides, and carbapenems. General annotation features are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
General information and annotation results of six R. mucilaginosa MAGs recovered from non-stimulated saliva of humans
| Characteristic | Data for MAG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHS0002 | OHS0003 | OHS0004 | OHS0005 | OHS0010 | |
| Species-level taxonomy | R. mucilaginosa | R. mucilaginosa | R. mucilaginosa | R. mucilaginosa | R. mucilaginosa |
| FastANI reference (%) | 96.92 | 96.76 | 96.04 | 95.85 | 96.37 |
| Host clinical condition | Oral health | Oral health | Oral health | Oral health | Oral health |
| SRA accession no. | SRR14122749 | SRR14122738 | SRR14122730 | SRR14122729 | SRR14122724 |
| Biosample accession no. | SAMN44699127 | SAMN44699128 | SAMN44699129 | SAMN44699130 | SAMN44699131 |
| Genbank accession no. | JBMDTY000000000.1 | JBMDTZ000000000.1 | JBMDUA000000000.1 | JBMDUB000000000.1 | JBMDUC000000000.1 |
| Number of reads | 4,153,480 | 3,007,863 | 5,049,354 | 3,952,422 | 5,745,540 |
| Number of contigs | 294 | 265 | 487 | 261 | 345 |
| N50 (bp) | 7,590 | 6,171 | 2,996 | 15,238 | 9,508 |
| Genome size (bp) | 1,148,813 | 1,171,221 | 1,294,581 | 2,093,715 | 1,923,565 |
| Genome completeness | 53.45% | 60.34% | 50.00% | 98.12% | 90.62% |
| Genome contamination | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.99% | 0% |
| Genome assembly coverage | 33.81 | 29.07 | 23.79 | 103.78 | 203.07 |
| GC content (%) | 61.48% | 61.47% | 61.80% | 60.09% | 60.04% |
| Protein encoding genes | 1,056 | 958 | 1,199 | 1,725 | 1,642 |
| RNA genes | 21 | 22 | 22 | 58 | 54 |
| tRNA genes | 20 | 19 | 21 | 49 | 45 |
| ncRNA genes | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Pseudogenes | 4 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| CRISPR arrays | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Antibiotic resistance genes | 79 | 65 | 72 | 129 | 127 |
| Carbohydrate-active enzymes | 48 | 38 | 47 | 86 | 81 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Novogene Institute (Hong Kong, China) for DNA sequencing assistance and CAPES (Process 062.01941/2015), FAPEAM (Process 024/2014), FEALQ (Project 104.792), and CNPq (Process 314806/2021-0) research foundations for the financial support.
Contributor Information
Daniel Saito, Email: danielsaito@yahoo.com, dsaito@uea.edu.br.
Catherine Putonti, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, llinois, USA.
FUNDING
Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz (104.792)
DATA AVAILABILITY
Reads and biosamples belong to NCBI’s bioproject PRJNA717815https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA717815under accession numbers displayed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Tierney BT, Yang Z, Luber JM, Beaudin M, Wibowo MC, Baek C, Mehlenbacher E, Patel CJ, Kostic AD. 2019. The landscape of genetic content in the gut and oral human microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 26:283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ruoff KL. 2002. Miscellaneous catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci: emerging opportunists. J Clin Microbiol 40:1129–1133. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1129-1133.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Grier A, Myers JA, O’Connor TG, Quivey RG, Gill SR, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT. 2021. Oral microbiota composition predicts early childhood caries onset. J Dent Res 100:599–607. doi: 10.1177/0022034520979926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Amer A, Galvin S, Healy CM, Moran GP. 2017. The microbiome of potentially malignant oral leukoplakia exhibits enrichment for Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia, Campylobacter, and Rothia species. Front Microbiol 8:2391. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hai PD, Hoa LTV. 2022. Rothia mucilaginosa bacteremia after pneumonia in patient with cirrhosis: first report from Vietnam. New Microbes New Infect 47:100984. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2022.100984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Haddad S, Saade Y, Ramlawi B, Kreidieh B, Gilbert B, Rao S. 2021. Native valve endocarditis complicated by abscess formation caused by Rothia mucilaginosa. IDCases 26:e01348. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bruminhent J, Tokarczyk MJ, Jungkind D, DeSimone JA Jr. 2013. Rothia mucilaginosa prosthetic device infections: a case of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 51:1629–1632. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03173-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ling CW, Sud K, Lee VW, Peterson GM, Van C, Zaidi STR, Patel RP, Castelino RL. 2023. Treatment and outcomes of peritonitis due to Rothia species in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and multicentre registry analysis. Perit Dial Int 43:220–230. doi: 10.1177/08968608221140227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Daoub A, Ansari H, Orfanos G, Barnett A. 2021. Rothia mucilaginosa: a case of septic arthritis in a native knee and review of the literature. BMJ Case Rep 14:e237015. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Mahobia N, Chaudhary P, Kamat Y. 2013. Rothia prosthetic knee joint infection: report and mini-review. New Microbes New Infect 1:2–5. doi: 10.1002/2052-2975.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, et al. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L, Yin Y. 2023. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W115–W121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Reads and biosamples belong to NCBI’s bioproject PRJNA717815https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA717815under accession numbers displayed in Table 1.
