Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1992 Nov;63(5):1406–1411. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81703-4

Tandem linkage of Shaker K+ channel subunits does not ensure the stoichiometry of expressed channels.

K McCormack 1, L Lin 1, L E Iverson 1, M A Tanouye 1, F J Sigworth 1
PMCID: PMC1261445  PMID: 1477286

Abstract

Shaker K+ channels are multimeric, probably tetrameric proteins. Substitution of a conserved leucine residue to valine (V2) at position 370 in the Drosophila Shaker 29-4 sequence results in large alterations in the voltage dependence of gating in the expressed channels. In order to determine the effects of this mutation in hybrid channels with a fixed stoichiometry of V2 and wild-type (WT) subunits we generated cDNA constructs of two linked-monomeric subunits similar to the tandem constructs previously reported by Isacoff, E. Y., Y. N. Jan, and L. Y. Jan. (1990. Nature (Lond.). 345:530-534). In addition, we constructed a tandem cDNA containing a wild-type subunit and a truncated nonfunctional subunit (Sh102) that suppresses channel expression. We report that the voltage-dependence of the channels produced with WT and V2 subunits varied significantly with the order of the subunits in the construct (WT-V2 or V2-WT), while the WT-Sh102 construct yielded currents that were much larger than expected. These results suggest that the tandem linkage of Shaker subunits does not guarantee the stoichiometry of the expressed channel proteins.

Full text

PDF
1406

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Catterall W. A. Structure and function of voltage-sensitive ion channels. Science. 1988 Oct 7;242(4875):50–61. doi: 10.1126/science.2459775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Christie M. J., North R. A., Osborne P. B., Douglass J., Adelman J. P. Heteropolymeric potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes from cloned subunits. Neuron. 1990 Mar;4(3):405–411. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90052-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gautam M., Tanouye M. A. Alteration of potassium channel gating: molecular analysis of the Drosophila Sh5 mutation. Neuron. 1990 Jul;5(1):67–73. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90034-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gisselmann G., Sewing S., Madsen B. W., Mallart A., Angaut-Petit D., Müller-Holtkamp F., Ferrus A., Pongs O. The interference of truncated with normal potassium channel subunits leads to abnormal behaviour in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1989 Aug;8(8):2359–2364. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08364.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartmann H. A., Kirsch G. E., Drewe J. A., Taglialatela M., Joho R. H., Brown A. M. Exchange of conduction pathways between two related K+ channels. Science. 1991 Feb 22;251(4996):942–944. doi: 10.1126/science.2000495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heginbotham L., MacKinnon R. The aromatic binding site for tetraethylammonium ion on potassium channels. Neuron. 1992 Mar;8(3):483–491. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90276-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science. 1990 Oct 26;250(4980):533–538. doi: 10.1126/science.2122519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hurtley S. M., Helenius A. Protein oligomerization in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1989;5:277–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.05.110189.001425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Isacoff E. Y., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Evidence for the formation of heteromultimeric potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes. Nature. 1990 Jun 7;345(6275):530–534. doi: 10.1038/345530a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iverson L. E., Rudy B. The role of the divergent amino and carboxyl domains on the inactivation properties of potassium channels derived from the Shaker gene of Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1990 Sep;10(9):2903–2916. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-09-02903.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamb A., Tseng-Crank J., Tanouye M. A. Multiple products of the Drosophila Shaker gene may contribute to potassium channel diversity. Neuron. 1988 Jul;1(5):421–430. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kavanaugh M. P., Hurst R. S., Yakel J., Varnum M. D., Adelman J. P., North R. A. Multiple subunits of a voltage-dependent potassium channel contribute to the binding site for tetraethylammonium. Neuron. 1992 Mar;8(3):493–497. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90277-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klausner R. D., Sitia R. Protein degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):611–614. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90104-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MacKinnon R. Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of a voltage-activated potassium channel. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):232–235. doi: 10.1038/350232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCormack K., Lin J. W., Iverson L. E., Rudy B. Shaker K+ channel subunits from heteromultimeric channels with novel functional properties. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990 Sep 28;171(3):1361–1371. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(90)90836-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCormack K., Tanouye M. A., Iverson L. E., Lin J. W., Ramaswami M., McCormack T., Campanelli J. T., Mathew M. K., Rudy B. A role for hydrophobic residues in the voltage-dependent gating of Shaker K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 1;88(7):2931–2935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter J. D., Smith L. D. Differential capacity for translation and lack of competition between mRNAs that segregate to free and membrane-bound polysomes. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):183–191. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruppersberg J. P., Schröter K. H., Sakmann B., Stocker M., Sewing S., Pongs O. Heteromultimeric channels formed by rat brain potassium-channel proteins. Nature. 1990 Jun 7;345(6275):535–537. doi: 10.1038/345535a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schoppa N. E., McCormack K., Tanouye M. A., Sigworth F. J. The size of gating charge in wild-type and mutant Shaker potassium channels. Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1712–1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1553560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Soreq H. The biosynthesis of biologically active proteins in mRNA-microinjected Xenopus oocytes. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1985;18(3):199–238. doi: 10.3109/10409238509085134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Timpe L. C., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Four cDNA clones from the Shaker locus of Drosophila induce kinetically distinct A-type potassium currents in Xenopus oocytes. Neuron. 1988 Oct;1(8):659–667. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90165-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verrall S., Hall Z. W. The N-terminal domains of acetylcholine receptor subunits contain recognition signals for the initial steps of receptor assembly. Cell. 1992 Jan 10;68(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90203-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yellen G., Jurman M. E., Abramson T., MacKinnon R. Mutations affecting internal TEA blockade identify the probable pore-forming region of a K+ channel. Science. 1991 Feb 22;251(4996):939–942. doi: 10.1126/science.2000494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yool A. J., Schwarz T. L. Alteration of ionic selectivity of a K+ channel by mutation of the H5 region. Nature. 1991 Feb 21;349(6311):700–704. doi: 10.1038/349700a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES