Abstract
The ultrastructure of the basal lamina of histologically normal human breast tissue was determined in 19 women undergoing operations for removal of a fibroadenoma or reduction mammoplasty. The day of the menstrual cycle was determined by hormone assay and direct questioning. Previously documented ultrastructural appearances were confirmed: in addition, three morphological variants were found. In all tissue examined, there was reduplication of basal lamina in some areas, which has been described previously as a pathological feature. Also, there was complex branching of the basal lamina into the periductular connective tissue. Some projections contained cytoplasmic processes and, in almost all, hemidesmosomes were seen. The third variant consisted of loops of basal lamina thrown up in folds into the collagenous stromal cuff. Reduplication of basal lamina was detected in breast tissue removed at all stages of the menstrual cycle, looping was not and could not be related to any particular phase of the menstrual cycle. However, complex branching was seen predominantly in the periovulatory and early luteal phase. We conclude that these appearances are normal variants of basal lamina. The appearance of branching basal lamina in the luteal phase suggests that this may be produced in response to endocrine stimulation.
Full text
PDF









Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ahmed A. The myoepithelium in human breast fibroadenoma. J Pathol. 1974 Nov;114(3):135–138. doi: 10.1002/path.1711140305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernfield M. R., Banerjee S. D., Cohn R. H. Dependence of salivary epithelial morphology and branching morphogenesis upon acid mucopolysaccharide-protein (proteoglycan) at the epithelial surface. J Cell Biol. 1972 Mar;52(3):674–689. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunha G. R., Bigsby R. M., Cooke P. S., Sugimura Y. Stromal-epithelial interactions in adult organs. Cell Differ. 1985 Sep;17(3):137–148. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(85)90481-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foote F. W., Stewart F. W. Comparative Studies of Cancerous Versus Noncancerous Breasts. Ann Surg. 1945 Jan;121(1):6–53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194501000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foote F. W., Stewart F. W. Comparative Studies of Cancerous Versus Noncancerous Breasts. Ann Surg. 1945 Feb;121(2):197–222. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194502000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grobstein C. Mechanisms of organogenetic tissue interaction. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1967 Sep;26:279–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan M. O., Olaizola M. Y. Ultrastructural observations on gynecomastia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1979 Nov;103(12):624–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kratochwil K., Schwartz P. Tissue interaction in androgen response of embryonic mammary rudiment of mouse: identification of target tissue for testosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):4041–4044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.4041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liotta L. A., Wicha M. S., Foidart J. M., Rennard S. I., Garbisa S., Kidwell W. R. Hormonal requirements for basement membrane collagen deposition by cultured rat mammary epithelium. Lab Invest. 1979 Dec;41(6):511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OZZELLO L., SPEER F. D. The mucopolysaccharides in the normal and diseased breast; their distribution and significance. Am J Pathol. 1958 Sep-Oct;34(5):993–1009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ormerod E. J., Rudland P. S. Cellular composition and organization of ductal buds in developing rat mammary glands: evidence for morphological intermediates between epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Am J Anat. 1984 Aug;170(4):631–652. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001700408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozzello L. Epithelial-stromal junction of normal and dysplastic mammary glands. Cancer. 1970 Mar;25(3):586–600. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197003)25:3<586::aid-cncr2820250314>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozzello L. Ultrastructure of the human mammary gland. Pathol Annu. 1971;6:1–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitelka D. R., Hamamoto S. T. Form and function in mammary epithelium: the interpretation of ultrastructure. J Dairy Sci. 1977 Apr;60(4):643–654. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)83914-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakakura T., Sakagami Y., Nishizuka Y. Persistence of responsiveness of adult mouse mammary gland to induction by embryonic mesenchyme. Dev Biol. 1979 Oct;72(2):201–210. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stirling J. W., Chandler J. A. The fine structure of the normal, resting terminal ductal-lobular unit of the female breast. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1976 Dec 27;372(3):205–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00433280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tannenbaum M., Weiss M., Marx A. J. Ultrastructure of the human mammary ductule. Cancer. 1969 Apr;23(4):958–978. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196904)23:4<958::aid-cncr2820230435>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicha M. S., Liotta L. A., Garbisa S., Kidwell W. R. Basement membrane collagen requirements for attachment and growth of mammary epithelium. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Nov;124(1):181–190. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. M., Daniel C. W. Mammary ductal elongation: differentiation of myoepithelium and basal lamina during branching morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 1983 Jun;97(2):274–290. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





