Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1992 Dec;63(6):1623–1631. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81730-7

Modeling the ion channel structure of cecropin.

S R Durell 1, G Raghunathan 1, H R Guy 1
PMCID: PMC1262279  PMID: 1283347

Abstract

Atomic-scale computer models were developed for how cecropin peptides may assemble in membranes to form two types of ion channels. The models are based on experimental data and physiochemical principles. Initially, cecropin peptides, in a helix-bend-helix motif, were arranged as antiparallel dimers to position conserved residues of adjacent monomers in contact. The dimers were postulated to bind to the membrane with the NH2-terminal helices sunken into the head-group layer and the COOH-terminal helices spanning the hydrophobic core. This causes a thinning of the top lipid layer of the membrane. A collection of the membrane bound dimers were then used to form the type I channel structure, with the pore formed by the transmembrane COOH-terminal helices. Type I channels were then assembled into a hexagonal lattice to explain the large number of peptides that bind to the bacterium. A concerted conformational change of a type I channel leads to the larger type II channel, in which the pore is formed by the NH2-terminal helices. By having the dimers move together, the NH2-terminal helices are inserted into the hydrophobic core without having to desolvate the charged residues. It is also shown how this could bring lipid head-groups into the pore lining.

Full text

PDF
1623

Images in this article

1625FIGURE 2
on p.1625
1625FIGURE 3
on p.1625
1626FIGURE 4
on p.1626
1626FIGURE 5
on p.1626
1627FIGURE 6
on p.1627
1627FIGURE 7
on p.1627
1628FIGURE 8
on p.1628

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andreu D., Merrifield R. B., Steiner H., Boman H. G. N-terminal analogues of cecropin A: synthesis, antibacterial activity, and conformational properties. Biochemistry. 1985 Mar 26;24(7):1683–1688. doi: 10.1021/bi00328a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boman H. G., Faye I., von Hofsten P., Kockum K., Lee J. Y., Xanthopoulos K. G., Bennich H., Engström A., Merrifield R. B., Andreu D. On the primary structures of lysozyme, cecropins and attacins from Hyalophora cecropia. Dev Comp Immunol. 1985 Summer;9(3):551–558. doi: 10.1016/0145-305x(85)90018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chothia C., Levitt M., Richardson D. Helix to helix packing in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jan 5;145(1):215–250. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90341-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen B., Fink J., Merrifield R. B., Mauzerall D. Channel-forming properties of cecropins and related model compounds incorporated into planar lipid membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(14):5072–5076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cramer W. A., Cohen F. S., Merrill A. R., Song H. Y. Structure and dynamics of the colicin E1 channel. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Apr;4(4):519–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickinson L., Russell V., Dunn P. E. A family of bacteria-regulated, cecropin D-like peptides from Manduca sexta. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 25;263(36):19424–19429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duclohier H., Molle G., Spach G. Antimicrobial peptide magainin I from Xenopus skin forms anion-permeable channels in planar lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1989 Nov;56(5):1017–1021. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82746-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fink J., Boman A., Boman H. G., Merrifield R. B. Design, synthesis and antibacterial activity of cecropin-like model peptides. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1989 Jun;33(6):412–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1989.tb00217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fink J., Merrifield R. B., Boman A., Boman H. G. The chemical synthesis of cecropin D and an analog with enhanced antibacterial activity. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6260–6267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox R. O., Jr, Richards F. M. A voltage-gated ion channel model inferred from the crystal structure of alamethicin at 1.5-A resolution. Nature. 1982 Nov 25;300(5890):325–330. doi: 10.1038/300325a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Go M., Miyazawa S. Relationship between mutability, polarity and exteriority of amino acid residues in protein evolution. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1980 Mar;15(3):211–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1980.tb02570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall J. E., Vodyanoy I., Balasubramanian T. M., Marshall G. R. Alamethicin. A rich model for channel behavior. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):233–247. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84151-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holak T. A., Engström A., Kraulis P. J., Lindeberg G., Bennich H., Jones T. A., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. The solution conformation of the antibacterial peptide cecropin A: a nuclear magnetic resonance and dynamical simulated annealing study. Biochemistry. 1988 Oct 4;27(20):7620–7629. doi: 10.1021/bi00420a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hultmark D., Engström A., Bennich H., Kapur R., Boman H. G. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropin D and four minor antibacterial components from Cecropia pupae. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Sep;127(1):207–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hultmark D., Steiner H., Rasmuson T., Boman H. G. Insect immunity. Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophora cecropia. Eur J Biochem. 1980 May;106(1):7–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb05991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kagan B. L., Selsted M. E., Ganz T., Lehrer R. I. Antimicrobial defensin peptides form voltage-dependent ion-permeable channels in planar lipid bilayer membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):210–214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karle I. L., Flippen-Anderson J. L., Agarwalla S., Balaram P. Crystal structure of [Leu1]zervamicin, a membrane ion-channel peptide: implications for gating mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5307–5311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lazarovici P., Primor N., Loew L. M. Purification and pore-forming activity of two hydrophobic polypeptides from the secretion of the Red Sea Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus). J Biol Chem. 1986 Dec 15;261(35):16704–16713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mellor I. R., Thomas D. H., Sansom M. S. Properties of ion channels formed by Staphylococcus aureus delta-toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Jul 21;942(2):280–294. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Merrifield R. B., Vizioli L. D., Boman H. G. Synthesis of the antibacterial peptide cecropin A (1-33). Biochemistry. 1982 Sep 28;21(20):5020–5031. doi: 10.1021/bi00263a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Okada M., Natori S. Primary structure of sarcotoxin I, an antibacterial protein induced in the hemolymph of Sarcophaga peregrina (flesh fly) larvae. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jun 25;260(12):7174–7177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Qu Z., Steiner H., Engström A., Bennich H., Boman H. G. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropins B and D from pupae of the Chinese oak silk moth, Antheraea pernyi. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Sep;127(1):219–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson J. S., Richardson D. C. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science. 1988 Jun 17;240(4859):1648–1652. doi: 10.1126/science.3381086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sander C., Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins. 1991;9(1):56–68. doi: 10.1002/prot.340090107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Steiner H., Andreu D., Merrifield R. B. Binding and action of cecropin and cecropin analogues: antibacterial peptides from insects. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Apr 7;939(2):260–266. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steiner H., Hultmark D., Engström A., Bennich H., Boman H. G. Sequence and specificity of two antibacterial proteins involved in insect immunity. Nature. 1981 Jul 16;292(5820):246–248. doi: 10.1038/292246a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Steiner H. Secondary structure of the cecropins: antibacterial peptides from the moth Hyalophora cecropia. FEBS Lett. 1982 Jan 25;137(2):283–287. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80368-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wade D., Boman A., Wåhlin B., Drain C. M., Andreu D., Boman H. G., Merrifield R. B. All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4761–4765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES