Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1993 Jan;64(1):26–35. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81337-7

Application of the one- and two-dimensional Ising models to studies of cooperativity between ion channels.

Y Liu 1, J P Dilger 1
PMCID: PMC1262299  PMID: 7679298

Abstract

The Ising model of statistical physics provides a framework for studying systems of protomers in which nearest neighbors interact with each other. In this article, the Ising model is applied to the study of cooperative phenomena between ligand-gated ion channels. Expressions for the mean open channel probability, rho o, and the variance, sigma 2, are derived from the grand partition function. In the one-dimensional Ising model, interactions between neighboring open channels give rise to a sigmoidal rho o versus concentration curve and a nonquadratic relationship between sigma 2 and rho o. Positive cooperativity increases the slope at the midpoint of the rho o versus concentration curve, shifts the apparent binding affinity to lower concentrations, and increases the variance for a given rho o. Negative cooperativity has the opposite effects. Strong negative cooperativity results in a bimodal sigma 2 versus rho o curve. The slope of the rho o versus concentration curve increases linearly with the number of binding sites on a protomer, but the sigma 2 versus rho o relationship is independent of the number of ligand binding sites. Thus, the sigma 2 versus rho o curve provides unambiguous information about channel interactions. In the two-dimensional Ising model, rho o and sigma 2 are calculated numerically from a series expansion of the grand partition function appropriate for weak interactions. Virtually all of the features exhibited by the one-dimensional model are qualitatively present in the two-dimensional model. These models are also applicable to voltage-gated ion channels.

Full text

PDF
26

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Changeux J. P., Thiéry J., Tung Y., Kittel C. On the cooperativity of biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Feb;57(2):335–341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colquhoun D., Ogden D. C. Activation of ion channels in the frog end-plate by high concentrations of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1988 Jan;395:131–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:501–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dilger J. P., Brett R. S. Direct measurement of the concentration- and time-dependent open probability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel. Biophys J. 1990 Apr;57(4):723–731. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82593-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F., KATZ B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):424–448. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill T. L., Chen Y. D. On the theory of ion transport across the nerve membrane. II. Potassium ion kinetics and cooperativity (with x = 4). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1711–1715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill T. L., Chen Y. D. Three-state, steady-state Ising systems: Monte Carlo and Bragg-Williams treatments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):4–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iwasa K., Ehrenstein G., Moran N., Jia M. Evidence for interactions between batrachotoxin-modified channels in hybrid neuroblastoma cells. Biophys J. 1986 Sep;50(3):531–537. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83491-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackson M. B. Dependence of acetylcholine receptor channel kinetics on agonist concentration in cultured mouse muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1988 Mar;397:555–583. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackson M. B. Kinetics of unliganded acetylcholine receptor channel gating. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):663–672. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83693-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kiss T., Nagy K. Interaction between sodium channels in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Eur Biophys J. 1985;12(1):13–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00254090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koshland D. E., Jr, Némethy G., Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry. 1966 Jan;5(1):365–385. doi: 10.1021/bi00865a047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu Y., Dilger J. P. Opening rate of acetylcholine receptor channels. Biophys J. 1991 Aug;60(2):424–432. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MONOD J., WYMAN J., CHANGEUX J. P. ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. J Mol Biol. 1965 May;12:88–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Magleby K. L., Pallotta B. S. Calcium dependence of open and shut interval distributions from calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle. J Physiol. 1983 Nov;344:585–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller C. Genetic manipulation of ion channels: a new approach to structure and mechanism. Neuron. 1989 Mar;2(3):1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90304-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neher E., Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260(5554):799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neher E., Sakmann B., Steinbach J. H. The extracellular patch clamp: a method for resolving currents through individual open channels in biological membranes. Pflugers Arch. 1978 Jul 18;375(2):219–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00584247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neumcke B., Stämpfli R. Alteration of the conductance of Na+ channels in the nodal membrane of frog nerve by holding potential and tetrodotoxin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Jan 5;727(1):177–184. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(83)90382-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pauling L. The Oxygen Equilibrium of Hemoglobin and Its Structural Interpretation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1935 Apr;21(4):186–191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.21.4.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sigworth F. J. The conductance of sodium channels under conditions of reduced current at the node of Ranvier. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:131–142. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Acetylcholine receptor activation by a site-selective ligand: nature of brief open and closed states in BC3H-1 cells. J Physiol. 1986 Jan;370:357–379. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by high concentrations of agonist. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:325–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H-1 cells by low concentrations of agonist. J Physiol. 1986 Apr;373:129–162. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sine S. M., Taylor P. The relationship between agonist occupation and the permeability response of the cholinergic receptor revealed by bound cobra alpha-toxin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 10;255(21):10144–10156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson C. J. Models for hemoglobin and allosteric enzymes. Biopolymers. 1968;6(8):1101–1118. doi: 10.1002/bip.1968.360060806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yeramian E., Trautmann A., Claverie P. Acetylcholine receptors are not functionally independent. Biophys J. 1986 Aug;50(2):253–263. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83459-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES