Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1993 Mar;64(3):724–734. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81432-2

Specificity of amphiphilic anionic peptides for fusion of phospholipid vesicles.

M Murata 1, S Takahashi 1, Y Shirai 1, S Kagiwada 1, R Hishida 1, S Ohnishi 1
PMCID: PMC1262385  PMID: 8471724

Abstract

We have synthesized five amphiphilic anionic peptides derived from E5 peptide [Murata, M., Takahashi, S., Kagiwada, S., Suzuki, A., Ohnishi, S. 1992. Biochemistry 31:1986-1992. E5NN and E5CC are duplications of the N-terminal and the C-terminal halves of E5, respectively, and E5CN is an inversion of the N- and the C-terminal halves. E5P contains a Pro residue in the center of E5 and E8 has 8 Glu residues and 9 Leu residues. We studied fusion of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) large unilamellar vesicles assayed by fluorescent probes. The peptides formed alpha-helical structure with different degrees; E5NN, E5CN, and E8 with high helical content and E5CC and E5P with low helical content. These peptides bound to DOPC vesicles at acidic pH in proportion to the helical content of peptide. The peptides caused leakage of DOPC vesicles which increased with decreasing pH. The leakage was also proportional to the helicity of peptide. Highly helical peptides E5NN, E5CN, and E8 caused hemolysis at acidic pH but not at neutral pH. The fusion activity was also dependent on the helicity of peptides. In fusion induced by an equimolar mixture of E5 analogues and K5 at neutral pH, E8, E5NN, and E5CN were most active but E5CC did not cause fusion. In fusion induced by E5-analogue peptides alone, E5CN was active at acidic pH but not at neutral pH. Other peptides did not cause fusion. Amphiphilic peptides also appear to require other factors to cause fusion.

Full text

PDF
724

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARTLETT G. R. Phosphorus assay in column chromatography. J Biol Chem. 1959 Mar;234(3):466–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brasseur R., Vandenbranden M., Cornet B., Burny A., Ruysschaert J. M. Orientation into the lipid bilayer of an asymmetric amphipathic helical peptide located at the N-terminus of viral fusion proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Nov 16;1029(2):267–273. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(90)90163-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):211–222. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):222–245. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cornette J. L., Cease K. B., Margalit H., Spouge J. L., Berzofsky J. A., DeLisi C. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 5;195(3):659–685. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Düzgüneş N., Gambale F. Membrane action of synthetic N-terminal peptides of influenza virus hemagglutinin and its mutants. FEBS Lett. 1988 Jan 25;227(2):110–114. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80879-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellens H., Bentz J., Szoka F. C. pH-induced destabilization of phosphatidylethanolamine-containing liposomes: role of bilayer contact. Biochemistry. 1984 Mar 27;23(7):1532–1538. doi: 10.1021/bi00302a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harter C., James P., Bächi T., Semenza G., Brunner J. Hydrophobic binding of the ectodomain of influenza hemagglutinin to membranes occurs through the "fusion peptide". J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6459–6464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lear J. D., DeGrado W. F. Membrane binding and conformational properties of peptides representing the NH2 terminus of influenza HA-2. J Biol Chem. 1987 May 15;262(14):6500–6505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Murata M., Kagiwada S., Takahashi S., Ohnishi S. Membrane fusion induced by mutual interaction of the two charge-reversed amphiphilic peptides at neutral pH. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 5;266(22):14353–14358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murata M., Sugahara Y., Takahashi S., Ohnishi S. pH-dependent membrane fusion activity of a synthetic twenty amino acid peptide with the same sequence as that of the hydrophobic segment of influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Biochem. 1987 Oct;102(4):957–962. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murata M., Takahashi S., Kagiwada S., Suzuki A., Ohnishi S. pH-dependent membrane fusion and vesiculation of phospholipid large unilamellar vesicles induced by amphiphilic anionic and cationic peptides. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 25;31(7):1986–1992. doi: 10.1021/bi00122a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parente R. A., Nir S., Szoka F. C., Jr Mechanism of leakage of phospholipid vesicle contents induced by the peptide GALA. Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 18;29(37):8720–8728. doi: 10.1021/bi00489a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Parente R. A., Nir S., Szoka F. C., Jr pH-dependent fusion of phosphatidylcholine small vesicles. Induction by a synthetic amphipathic peptide. J Biol Chem. 1988 Apr 5;263(10):4724–4730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rafalski M., Lear J. D., DeGrado W. F. Phospholipid interactions of synthetic peptides representing the N-terminus of HIV gp41. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 28;29(34):7917–7922. doi: 10.1021/bi00486a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rose G. D., Geselowitz A. R., Lesser G. J., Lee R. H., Zehfus M. H. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science. 1985 Aug 30;229(4716):834–838. doi: 10.1126/science.4023714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schlegel R., Wade M. Biologically active peptides of the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein. J Virol. 1985 Jan;53(1):319–323. doi: 10.1128/jvi.53.1.319-323.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shen D. F., Huang A., Huang L. An improved method for covalent attachment of antibody to liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Jul 14;689(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(82)90185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Struck D. K., Hoekstra D., Pagano R. E. Use of resonance energy transfer to monitor membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1981 Jul 7;20(14):4093–4099. doi: 10.1021/bi00517a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Szoka F., Jr, Papahadjopoulos D. Procedure for preparation of liposomes with large internal aqueous space and high capture by reverse-phase evaporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4194–4198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Takahashi S. Conformation of membrane fusion-active 20-residue peptides with or without lipid bilayers. Implication of alpha-helix formation for membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1990 Jul 3;29(26):6257–6264. doi: 10.1021/bi00478a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wharton S. A., Martin S. R., Ruigrok R. W., Skehel J. J., Wiley D. C. Membrane fusion by peptide analogues of influenza virus haemagglutinin. J Gen Virol. 1988 Aug;69(Pt 8):1847–1857. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-69-8-1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES