Abstract
ketenylidene (C2O) is an electronically intriguing small molecule with significant potential as a C2 synthon in organic synthesis. However, its high reactivity has thus far precluded practical applications. Herein, we report the synthesis of a new reagent, the heterocumulene Ph2S═C═C═O (1), a well‐defined C2O equivalent that accurately replicates the chemical reactivity profile of C2O in a controlled manner. 1 uniquely integrates ketene‐like and classical carbene reactivity. In the presence of Brønsted acids, 1 undergoes initial 1,2‐addition to form a sulfur ylide intermediate, which can be exploited for subsequent reactions including cyclopropanation, epoxidation, or X–H addition. The CCO fragment transfer strategy, starting from simple precursors, enables efficient access to α‐cyclopropyl‐ as well as α‐epoxy‐carbonyl derivatives and structurally complex bicyclic cyclopropanes.
Keywords: Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes, CCO fragment transfer, Cyclopropanation, Heterocumulenes, Sulfur ylides
The synthesis, isolation, and full characterization of the unprecedented heterocumulene Ph2SCCO is presented. Starting from simple precursors, Ph2SCCO provides direct access to the valuable class of (bicyclic) α‐cyclopropylcarbonyl compounds. It has emerged from our reactivity studies as an excellent reagent for the CCO fragment transfer in organic synthesis.

Substituted cyclopropanes have high value as versatile synthetic intermediates, used for constructing a wide range of useful structural motifs,[ 1 , 2 ] and they are frequently found in natural products.[ 3 , 4 ] They constitute key structural elements in pharmaceutical molecules.[ 5 ] In fact, cyclopropanes rank as the 10th most commonly used ring system in small‐molecule drugs.[ 6 ] The structural diversity of substituted cyclopropanes is remarkably broad, ranging from simple monocyclic compounds to complex fused ring systems (Scheme 1a).[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ] A particularly noteworthy subclass is that of (hetero)bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes (I and II), which, due to their highly rigid, sp3‐rich core structures, have emerged as valuable building blocks in medicinal chemistry.[ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]
Scheme 1.

Evolution of a versatile CCO‐transfer reagent. a) Retrosynthetic analysis of selected cyclopropane‐containing molecules and introduction of C2O. b) Introduction of the Bestmann ylide VIII and discussion of its reactivity. c) Reactivity‐guided design and presentation of Ph2SCCO (1).
Given the importance of these structural motifs, a wide variety of synthetic methods have been developed.[ 15 ] Prominent examples are the Simmons–Smith[ 16 ] and Corey–Chaykovsky cyclopropanations,[ 17 , 18 ] as well as transition metal‐catalyzed carbene insertions into olefins using diazo compounds.[ 19 , 20 ] For the construction of annulated cyclopropanes, intramolecular cyclopropanation reactions such as enyne cyclizations are particularly well suited, as they enable the formation of two rings in a single step. This elegant strategy is well established for diazo precursors.[ 21 ] However, intramolecular variants of the classical Corey–Chaykovsky cyclopropanation have only rarely been applied[ 22 , 23 ] in this context, and the few reported examples rely on transition metal catalysis.[ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]
From a retrosynthetic perspective, a range of bioactive cyclopropanes can be traced back to α‐cyclopropyl carbonyl compounds (V; Scheme 1a). An ideal approach to this structural motif could involve the use of dicarbon monoxide/ketenylidene (C2O) (VI) as a C2 synthon, as VI uniquely combines the reactivity of both carbenes and ketenes. Besides its presence in star‐forming regions of the interstellar medium,[ 31 ] very few reactivity studies on C2O have been reported. Bayes et al.,[ 32 ] and later MacKay et al.,[ 33 ] demonstrated that carbon suboxide (C3O2) can generate C2O in the gas phase upon UV irradiation. This highly reactive species can, for instance, be trapped with tetramethylethylene to form either the dimer of the intermediate cyclopropylidene ketene or, in the presence of trace amounts of water, the α‐cyclopropyl carboxylic acid VII. Despite these promising entries, C2O has not found further application as a C2 synthon in organic synthesis, which is likely due to the high reactivity as a triplet ground state compound,[ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] prohibiting its isolation in the condensed phase.[ 38 ]
An alternative strategy involves the use of synthetic equivalents, wherein the reactive fragment is stabilized. In this context, Bestmann ylide (Ph3PCCO; VIII)[ 39 ] has found broad application in organic synthesis, primarily exploiting both Wittig‐ and ketene‐type reactivity. VIII is commonly employed in the preparation of cyclic (IX) or acyclic α,β‐unsaturated carboxylic acid derivatives (Scheme 1b).[ 40 ] However, since stabilization of the C2O moiety in VIII is achieved via a P‐ylide, cyclopropanation reactivity is lacking. In contrast to P‐ylides, S‐ylides display carbene‐like reactivity and have been extensively used in cyclopropanation reactions.[ 41 ] Here, we pursue the synthesis of the unprecedented sulfur‐based analogue Ph2S═C═C═O (1) (Scheme 1c). 1 should allow for a significantly modulated and controllable expression of C2O‐type reactivity establishing both ketene and carbene reactivity. In the presence of acidic substrates, 1 would initially undergo a stepwise 1,2‐addition to form a S‐ylide (XIV), which could subsequently react with olefins in a Corey–Chaykovsky‐type reaction to furnish the desired α‐cyclopropyl carbonyl compounds V. In the following, we describe the synthesis of 1 and investigate its reactivity with respect to its potential as a CCO transfer reagent.
Classical ketene synthesis strategies, including base‐induced 1,2‐elimination from esters,[ 42 , 43 ] as applied in the preparation of Bestmann's ylide (VIII), were in our hands unsuccessful for accessing 1. However, based on previous studies from our group[ 44 , 45 , 46 ] as well as the Severin group,[ 47 ] it was known that unsaturated diazo compounds of the structure X═C═N2 can undergo a formal N2/CO exchange upon reaction with carbon monoxide (CO).[ 48 , 49 , 50 ] Therefore, we decided to test the exchange strategy using the recently described reagent Ph2S═C═N2 (A)[ 51 ] as the starting point for our investigations.
To our delight, the reaction of A with CO (1 bar) from −78 °C to 0 °C proceeded with high selectivity, affording the desired heterocumulene 1 as a crystalline colorless solid in 85% yield (Scheme 2). DFT calculations at the PBE0‐D3(BJ)/def2‐TZVP/SMD(THF) level of theory suggest that this transformation proceeds via an asynchronous concerted mechanism, which features a low activation barrier (ΔG ‡ = +13.5 kcal mol−1) and is highly exergonic (ΔG 0 = −56.0 kcal/mol−1) (see Supporting Information), consistent with previous theoretical studies of N2/CO exchange in diazoolefins.[ 44 ]
Scheme 2.

a) Synthesis of heterocumulene 1 and computed ΔG⁰ and ΔG‡ values for the formal N2/CO exchange at the PBE0‐D3(BJ)/def2‐TZVP/SMD(THF) level of theory. b) X‐ray solid‐state structure of 1. Thermal ellipsoids are shown with 50% probability. c) NPA charges and Wiberg bond indices (WBIs) of 1. d) Frontier molecular orbitals of 1 (isovalue = 0.6).
Based on differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), cumulene 1 decomposes around 82 °C, similar to the diazo precursor A; however, the decomposition enthalpy is much smaller [ΔH ∼ 400 J g−1 (1) versus ΔH ∼ 1100 J g−1 (A)[ 51 ]]. X‐ray diffraction analysis[ 52 ] of 1 utilizing NoSpherA2[ 53 , 54 ] refinement shows a shorter S1─C1 bond [1.6717(13) Å] than in its precursor Ph2SCN2 [1.727(2) Å]. The C1─C2 bond [1.2767(16) Å] is slightly longer than in Ph3PCCO (VIII)[ 55 , 56 ] [1.247(2) Å]. The S1─C1─C2 angle [125.95(10)°] is wider than in Ph2SCN2 [112.6(2)°] but significantly narrower than in Ph3PCCO [143.1(1)°].[ 55 ] Considering the structural parameters, ylide‐type structure 1′ likely dominates the overall electronic structure of 1 compared to ylene 1 and ynolate 1′′.
This interpretation is supported by the unusually high‐field chemical shift of the C1 atom in the 13C NMR spectrum at −9.0 ppm (C6D6). This value is significantly lower than those observed in alkyl‐ or aryl‐substituted ketenes (24–47 ppm)[ 57 ] or vinylidene ketenes (9–15 ppm),[ 44 , 47 ] and is comparable to the C1 atom in VIII (−10.5 ppm).[ 58 ] These values suggest a high electron density at the ylide C‐atom. A natural population analysis of the optimized structure shows that the central C1 atom in 1 carries almost a full negative charge (−0.88e), while the adjacent S‐atom is fully positively charged (+0.96e). The C2 atom and the O‐atom exhibit partial positive (+0.59e) and partial negative (−0.53e) charges, respectively, consistent with a polarized C═O bond.[ 59 ] Wiberg bond indices (WBIs) indicate that the C─S bond has strong single‐bond character (WBI = 1.14), while the C─C (WBI = 1.98) and C─O bonds (WBI = 1.80) are best described as double bonds, supporting the strong contribution of Lewis structure 1′. The two highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO and HOMO‒1) reveal a picture consistent with other carbone‐type systems.[ 60 , 61 ] Both HOMO‒1 (π‐type) and HOMO (σ‐type) show significant lone pair character on C1, with some delocalization onto the adjacent carbonyl fragment. Due to the pronounced localization of electron density at C1, 1 should exhibit nucleophilicity and Brønsted basicity.
With 1 in hand, reactivity studies were carried out to evaluate its suitability as a C2 synthon. Following the reactivity design outlined above, 1 was reacted with benzyl alcohol (BnOH, 2a). In situ NMR monitoring (see Supporting Information) revealed that, after 14 h at room temperature, 1 was fully consumed to give the ester‐based S‐ylide 3a with high selectivity. Given that S‐ylides exhibit Corey–Chaykovsky‐type reactivity in the presence of Michael acceptors,[ 62 ] the in situ generated ylide 3a was subsequently reacted with the alkylidene malonate 4a. After just 10 min, complete consumption was observed, and chromatographic purification afforded the desired α‐cyclopropyl ester 6aa in 81% yield (Scheme 3a). This experiment clearly demonstrates that 1 is in principle capable of accurately mimicking the reactivity of C2O, while offering a significantly tamed and highly selective reaction profile.
Scheme 3.

Reactivity studies of 1. a) Sequential one‐pot CCO transfer using different Brønsted acids. Depicted reaction times refer to the first step. Cyclopropanation (second step) is complete in all cases after 10 min at rt. b) Scope of different electron‐deficient π‐systems. Depicted reaction times refer to the second step at rt. c) Scope of different Brønsted acids. a)Reaction performed in C6D6. b)Second step was conducted at 60‒100 °C instead of rt, for details, see Supporting Information.
To evaluate the generality of the CCO‐transfer, additional alcohols 2b‐g were tested using the same Michael acceptor 4a as terminating reagent for the one‐pot procedure. Counterintuitively, the complete conversion of EtOH (2b) to the corresponding ethyl ester‐substituted S‐ylide 3b required 48 h. The low stability of ylide 3b at room temperature was already reported in 1966 by Nozaki et al.[ 63 ] and may explain the moderate yield (57%) of 6ba observed after prolonged reaction times. In line with the increased acidity (pK a ≈ 10) of phenol (PhOH, 2c) compared to aliphatic alcohols (pK a ≈ 16), the formation of the corresponding S‐ylide 3c proceeded significantly faster, with complete conversion observed after just 10 min. The product 6ca was isolated in very good yield (80%) and the structure was verified by X‐ray diffraction (see Supporting Information). The use of diols (2d and 2f) also led, depending on the equivalents of 1 used, to either the hydroxy ester 6da (63%) or the diester 6fa (72%).
Next, we became interested in whether other acidic compounds could also be exploited for CCO transfer. Surprisingly, the method proved compatible even with nonacceptor‐substituted amines (pK a ≈ 35). Sequential reaction of 1 with pyrrolidine 2e and subsequently with 4a afforded the α‐cyclopropylamide 6ea in a good yield of 73%. To our delight, the use of C─H acidic compounds was also possible, as exemplified using dipivaloylmethane 2g. Following the established one‐pot procedure, three new C─C bonds were formed, and the cyclopropyl ketone 6ga was obtained in 76% yield.
Once the scope of Brønsted‐acidic substrates had been explored, we turned our attention to investigating whether the in situ generated S‐ylide intermediate 3 could also be reacted with other electron‐deficient olefins (Scheme 3b). For these studies, the benzyl ester‐based S‐ylide 3a was generated in situ and treated with dimethyl fumarate 4b which led to formation of the literature‐known 1,2,3‐substituted cyclopropane 6ab [ 64 ] as a single trans‐diastereomer in 70% yield. Reaction with the cyclic 1,2‐disubstituted olefin N‐methylmaleimide (4c) afforded the azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane derivative 6ac in moderate yield (43%). The relatively low yield here is attributed to the additional formation of a mixture of the trans‐product and undesired cyclopropane ring opening (see Supporting Information). The reaction of S‐ylide 3a with mono‐acceptor‐substituted olefins such as methyl acrylate (4d) and acrylonitrile (4e) gave a separable diastereomeric mixture of the disubstituted cyclopropanes 6ad and 6ae in good yields of 67% and 68%, respectively, with moderate diastereoselectivity favoring the trans‐diastereomer.
S‐ylides are well‐known for their ability to convert aldehydes and ketones into the corresponding epoxides.[ 17 , 65 ] To probe this reactivity, we treated 3a with benzaldehyde (4f) or benzil (4g) and could isolate the desired epoxides 6af and 6ag in moderate (54%) to good (83%) yields, respectively. Finally, we investigated whether 3a could also undergo a transition metal‐free formal insertion into polarized X─H bonds (Scheme 3c). This type of transformation typically proceeds via a two‐step mechanism involving protonation of the ylide followed by an SN‐type substitution.[ 66 ] Given that highly acidic substrates are ideal for this transformation, we first tested pivalic acid (5a) (pK a ≈ 5) as a reaction partner. After only 10 min, no ylide could be detected, and subsequent isolation afforded the desired pivalate ester 7aa in excellent yield (85%). Likewise, treatment with 4‐methoxythiophenol (5b) (pK a ≈ 7) gave the corresponding thioether 7ab in 77% yield.
Having successfully demonstrated that 1 can be used both sequentially and divergently to link two different molecules, we explored whether the CCO fragment could also be transferred intramolecularly. Hence, we synthesized substrates 8 containing a Brønsted‐acidic functional group connected via either a C1 or C2 linker to an acceptor‐substituted olefin. A successful CCO fragment transfer in such systems would thus enable the direct formation of complex annulated ring systems from straightforward, acyclic precursors in a single step.
Tosyl‐substituted allylamine 8a reacted in just 15 min with 1 at room temperature to afford the bicyclic lactam 10a in a very good yield of 77% (Scheme 4a). A 1,2‐disubstituted double bond (8b) gave product 10b as a single diastereomer in excellent yield (88%). Higher substituted olefins (8c and 8d) were also well tolerated, affording the corresponding substituted cyclopropanes with high diastereoselectivity and excellent yields (10c: 87%; 10d: 76%). The introduction of alkyl substituents on the Michael acceptor typically results in reduced reactivity, which likely explains why CCO transfer in these cases required elevated temperatures (60 °C) and extended reaction times (12 h). Notably, the reaction is highly diastereoselective but not diastereospecific, yielding a single diastereomer from both 8c and 8d, irrespective of the configuration of the starting alkene E/Z double bond configuration. This observation supports a stepwise cyclopropanation mechanism, in which the same betaine‐like intermediate is formed.[ 67 ] Notably, the CCO transfer approach also enables the diastereoselective construction of synthetically challenging quaternary stereocenters, as demonstrated in the case of 10c.
Scheme 4.

Reactivity studies of 1 in a one‐step CCO‐transfer. a) Scope of different amines. b) Mechanistic proposal for the formation of the unexpected olefin 10g. c) Scope of different alcohols. d) Scope of different C‒H acids. a)Reaction was performed at rt. b)Reaction was first stirred at rt and then heated to 60 °C or 80 °C, for details, see Supporting Information. c)Reaction conducted at 80 °C.
Extension of the linker length with Tosyl‐substituted homoallylamines (8e and 8f) resulted in the corresponding azabicyclo[4.1.0]heptanones 10e and 10f in excellent yields of 86% and 80%, respectively. Surprisingly, the use of 1,2‐disubstituted olefin 8g did not yield the expected bicyclic product but gave the unsaturated lactam 10g in 69% yield. We postulate that the formation of this undesired constitutional isomer proceeds via initial formation of the trans‐configured betaine (trans‐11), which exists in equilibrium with cis‐11 (Scheme 4b).[ 68 ] Since the stereoelectronic features of trans‐11 are not favorable for a fast intramolecular SN2 reaction, a competing semipinacol‐type rearrangement starting from cis‐11 and releasing Ph2S to form 10g’ is postulated. 10g’ isomerizes into the observed unsaturated lactam 10g as the final product, verified by X‐ray diffraction.
We next investigated the influence of the Brønsted‐acidic functionality. Analogous to the nitrogen‐based substrate 8e, the corresponding oxygen analogue 8h reacted to afford the bicyclic lactone 10h in a satisfactory yield of 67% (Scheme 4c). Prompted by the unusual reactivity of amine 8g, we turned our attention to the corresponding oxygen analogue 8i. Similar challenges in achieving the desired CCO transfer were encountered, with the product 10i being isolated in only 37% yield together with other unidentified byproducts. Finally, we turned our attention to exploring the construction of purely carbocyclic frameworks using 8j. Remarkably, triester 8j reacted with 1 after 12 h at 60 °C, to give the desired bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane 10j as a crystalline solid in 67% yield. Similarly, the use of the 1,2‐disubstituted olefin 8k led to the formation of the bicyclic product 10k in a satisfactory yield of 55%.
In summary, we have reported the synthesis, isolation, and characterization of the unprecedented heterocumulene Ph2S═C═C═O (1). We have shown that 1 mimics the reactivity of the nonisolable dicarbon monoxide (C2O), enabling for the first time a highly selective CCO transfer across a broad substrate scope. This reactivity allows for the transition metal‐free one‐step synthesis of highly complex 3D building blocks from simple starting materials. Considering the broad use of Bestmann ylide in organic synthesis, we are confident that the S‐ylide based reagent 1 will find wide application as a versatile C2 synthon in synthesis.
Supporting Information
The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information.
Conflict of Interests
A patent application related to the CCO transfer reagent was filed.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
Sebastian Henke is thanked for access to the TGA and DSC instrument. This work is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy—EXC 2033‐390677874—RESOLV and the European Research Council (ERC‐StG “CC‐CHARGED” 101077332; to M.M.H.).
Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Sun Q., Hauda J., Tymann D., Antoni P. W., Goddard R., Hansmann M. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202518689. 10.1002/anie.202518689
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
References
- 1. Kulinkovich O. G., in Cyclopropanes in Organic Synthesis, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sansinenea E., Ortiz A., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202200210. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ma S., Mandalapu D., Wanga S., Zhang Q., Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 926–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chen D. Y.‐K., Pouwer R. H., Richard J.‐A., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Talele T. T., J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8712–8756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Taylor R. D., MacCoss M., Lawson A. D. G. J., J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 5845–5859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Monn J. A., Valli M. J., Massey S. M., Wright R. A., Salhoff C. R., Johnson B. G., Howe T., Alt C. A., Rhodes G. A., Robey R. L., Griffey K. R., Tizzano J. P., Kallman M. J., Helton D. R., Schoepp D. D., J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 528–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Staudinger H., Ruzicka L., Helv. Chim. Acta 1924, 7, 177–201. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kuttruff C. A., Ferrara M., Bretschneider T., Hoerer S., Handschuh S., Nosse B., Romig H., Nicklin P., Roth G. J., ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 1252–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Niwa H., Wakamatsu K., Yamada K., Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4543–4546. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ye L., Gu Q.‐S., Tian Y., Meng X., Chen G.‐C., Liu X.‐Y., Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Muriel B., Gagnebin A., Waser J., Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 10716–10722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Li Y., Feng J., Huang F., Baell J. B., Chem. Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202301017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li D., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 297, 117951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wu W., Lin Z., Jiang H., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 7315–7329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Simmons H. E., Smith R. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5323–5324. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Corey E. J., Chaykovsky M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 3782–3783. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Corey E. J., Chaykovsky M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1353–1364. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nozaki H., Moriuti S., Yamabe M., Noyori R., Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ford A., Miel H., Ring A., Slattery C. N., Maguire A. R., McKervey M. A., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9981–10080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Davies H. M. L. in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 4 (Eds: Trost B. M., Fleming I.), Pergamon, Oxford: 1991, pp. 1031–1067. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Unthank M. G., Hussain N., Aggarwal V. K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7066–7069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fritz S. P., Matlock J. V., McGarrigle E. M., Aggarwal V. K., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10827–10831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Müller P., Fernandez D., Nury P., Rossier J.‐C., Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 935–945. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lippert A. R., Naganawa A., Keleshian V. L., Bode J. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15790–15799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Huang X., Klimczyk S., Veiros L. F., Maulide N., Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1105. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Vidal L., Chen P.‐P., Nicolas E., Hackett A., Robertson C. M., Houk K. N., Aïssa C., Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 8503–8508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Neuhaus J. D., Oost R., Merad J., Maulide N., Top. Curr. Chem. 2018, 376, 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Klose I., Oost R., Neuhaus J., Maulide N., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 8701–8780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li A.‐H., Da L.‐X., Aggarwal V. K., Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2341–2372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ohishi M., Suzuki H., Ishikawa S.‐I., Yamada C., Kanamori H., Irvine W. M., Brown R. D., Godfrey P. D., Kaifu N., Astrophys. J. 1991, 380, L39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Willis C., Bayes K. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3203–3208. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Parker G., Wiseman D., Wintner C., MacKay C., J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Olsen J. F., Burnelle L., Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 5451–5464. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Thomson C., Wishart B. J., Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 31, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Brown S. T., Yamaguchi Y., Schaefer H. F., J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3603–3612. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Smith G. R., W. Weltner, Jr. , J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 4592–4604. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jacox M. E., Milligan D. E., Moll N. G., Thompson W. E., J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 3734–3746. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Matthews C. N., Birum G. H., Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 5707–5710. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bestmann H. J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1977, 16, 349–364. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Beutner G. L., George D. T., Org. Process Res. Dev. 2023, 27, 10–41. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bestmann H. J., Schmidt M., Schobert R., Synthesis 1988, 1988, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Schobert R., Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Antoni P. W., Reitz J., Hansmann M. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 12878–12885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Koike T., Yu J.‐K., Hansmann M. M., Science 2024, 385, 305–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. He Y., Lyu Y., Tymann D., Antoni P. W., Hansmann M. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202415228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Feuerstein W., Varava P., Fadaei‐Tirani F., Scopelliti R., Severin K., Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 11509–11512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wei R., Wang X.‐F., Ruiz D. A., Liu L. L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202219211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ward R. J., Jörges M., Remm H., Kiliani E., Krischer F., Le Dé Q., Gessner V. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 24602–24608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.For the S‐based ketenyl anion, see: Krischer F., Jörges M., Leung T.‐F., Darmandeh H., Gessner V. G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202309629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sun Q., Belting J.‐N., Hauda J., Tymann D., Antoni P. W., Goddard R., Hansmann M. M., Science 2025, 387, 885–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Deposition numbers 2480574 (1), 2480575 (6ca), 2480576 (10b), 2480577 (10f), 2480578 (10g), 2480579 (10j), contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.
- 53. Kleemiss F., Dolomanov O. V., Bodensteiner M., Peyerimhoff N., Midgley L., Bourhis L. J., Genoni A., Malaspina L. A., Jayatilaka D., Spencer J. L., White F., Grundkötter‐Stock B., Steinhauer S., Lentz D., Puschmann H., Grabowsky S., Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 1675–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Midgley L., Bourhis L. J., Dolomanov O. V., Grabowsky S., Kleemiss F., Puschmann H., Peyerimhoff N., Acta Cryst. 2021, A77, 519–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Brar A., Unruh D. K., Aquino A. J., Krempner C., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3513–3516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Daly J. J., Wheatley P. J., J. Chem. Soc. A 1966, 1703. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Duddeck H., Praas H.‐W., Magn. Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 182–184. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Boeckman R. K., Pero J. E., Boehmler D. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11032–11033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.For a comparison with Bestmann's ylide, see the Supporting Information.
- 60. Tonner R., Öxler F., Neumüller B., Petz W., Frenking G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8038–8042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Tonner R., Frenking G., Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 3260–3272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Payne G. B., J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 3351–3355. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Nozaki H., Tunemoto D., Matubara S., Kondô K., Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 545–551. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tanaka K., Manabe H., Irie R., Oikawa M., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 92, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Aggarwal V. K., Winn C. L., Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 611–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hu R., Miao C.‐B., Guo W., Sun J., Synlett 2025, 36, 739–743. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Landor S. R., Landor P. D., Kalli M., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 2921–2925. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Riches S. L., Saha C., Fontán Filgueira N., Grange E., McGarrigle E. M., Aggarwal V. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7626–7630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
