Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1993 Apr;64(4):1306–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81497-8

New physical concepts for cell amoeboid motion.

E Evans 1
PMCID: PMC1262449  PMID: 8494986

Abstract

Amoeboid motion of cells is an essential mechanism in the function of many biological organisms (e.g., the regiment of scavenger cells in the immune defense system of animals). This process involves rapid chemical polymerization (with numerous protein constituents) to create a musclelike contractile network that advances the cell over the surface. Significant progress has been made in the biology and biochemistry of motile cells, but the physical dynamics of cell spreading and contraction are not well understood. The reason is that general approaches are formulated from complex mass, momentum, and chemical reaction equations for multiphase-multicomponent flow with the nontrivial difficulty of moving boundaries. However, there are strong clues to the dynamics that allow bold steps to be taken in simplifying the physics of motion. First, amoeboid cells often exhibit exceptional kinematics, i.e., steady advance and retraction of local fixed-shape patterns. Second, recent evidence has shown that cell projections "grow" by polymerization along the advancing boundary of the cell. Together, these characteristics represent a local growth process pinned to the interfacial contour of a contractile network. As such, the moving boundary becomes tractable, but subtle features of the motion lead to specific requirements for the chemical nature of the boundary polymerization process. To demonstrate these features, simple examples for limiting conditions of substrate interaction (i.e., "strong" and "weak" adhesion) are compared with data from experimental studies of yeast particle engulfment by blood granulocytes and actin network dynamics in fishscale keratocytes.

Full text

PDF
1306

Images in this article

1308FIGURE 2
on p.1308
1316FIGURE 4
on p.1316

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dembo M., Harlow F. Cell motion, contractile networks, and the physics of interpenetrating reactive flow. Biophys J. 1986 Jul;50(1):109–121. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83444-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DiMilla P. A., Barbee K., Lauffenburger D. A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys J. 1991 Jul;60(1):15–37. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82027-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans E., Yeung A. Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys J. 1989 Jul;56(1):151–160. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82660-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartwig J. H., Niederman R., Lind S. E. Cortical actin structures and their relationship to mammalian cell movements. Subcell Biochem. 1985;11:1–49. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1698-3_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartwig J. H., Yin H. L. The organization and regulation of the macrophage actin skeleton. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):117–125. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ishihara A., Holifield B., Jacobson K. Analysis of lateral redistribution of a plasma membrane glycoprotein-monoclonal antibody complex [corrected]. J Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;106(2):329–343. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ishijima A., Doi T., Sakurada K., Yanagida T. Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro. Nature. 1991 Jul 25;352(6333):301–306. doi: 10.1038/352301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobson K., Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Janmey P. A. Mechanical properties of cytoskeletal polymers. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;3(1):4–11. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90159-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janson L. W., Kolega J., Taylor D. L. Modulation of contraction by gelation/solation in a reconstituted motile model. J Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;114(5):1005–1015. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.5.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kucik D. F., Kuo S. C., Elson E. L., Sheetz M. P. Preferential attachment of membrane glycoproteins to the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of lamella. J Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;114(5):1029–1036. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.5.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee J., Gustafsson M., Magnusson K. E., Jacobson K. The direction of membrane lipid flow in locomoting polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Science. 1990 Mar 9;247(4947):1229–1233. doi: 10.1126/science.2315695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron. 1988 Nov;1(9):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oster G. F., Perelson A. S. The physics of cell motility. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987;8:35–54. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1987.supplement_8.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pollard T. D., Cooper J. A. Actin and actin-binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:987–1035. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Southwick F. S., Stossel T. P. Contractile proteins in leukocyte function. Semin Hematol. 1983 Oct;20(4):305–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stossel T. P., Hartwig J. H., Yin H. L., Stendahl O. The motor of amoeboid leucocytes. Biochem Soc Symp. 1980;45:51–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Symons M. H., Mitchison T. J. Control of actin polymerization in live and permeabilized fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):503–513. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.3.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor D. L., Fechheimer M. Cytoplasmic structure and contractility: the solation--contraction coupling hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1095):185–197. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Theriot J. A., Mitchison T. J. Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells. Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):126–131. doi: 10.1038/352126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Valberg P. A., Feldman H. A. Magnetic particle motions within living cells. Measurement of cytoplasmic viscosity and motile activity. Biophys J. 1987 Oct;52(4):551–561. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83244-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Valerius N. H., Stendahl O., Hartwig J. H., Stossel T. P. Distribution of actin-binding protein and myosin in polymorphonuclear leukocytes during locomotion and phagocytosis. Cell. 1981 Apr;24(1):195–202. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90515-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhu C., Skalak R. A continuum model of protrusion of pseudopod in leukocytes. Biophys J. 1988 Dec;54(6):1115–1137. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83047-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES