Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1993 Jun;64(6):1789–1800. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81550-9

Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential.

M Hibino 1, H Itoh 1, K Kinosita Jr 1
PMCID: PMC1262513  PMID: 8369408

Abstract

Changes in the membrane conductance of sea urchin eggs, during the course of electroporation, were investigated over the time range of 0.5 microsecond to 1 ms by imaging the transmembrane potential at a submicrosecond resolution with the voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye RH292. When a rectangular electric pulse of moderate intensity was applied across an egg, a position-dependent potential developed synchronously with the pulse, as theory predicts for a cell with an insulating membrane. From the rise and fall times, the membrane capacitance of unfertilized eggs was estimated to be 0.95 microF/cm2 and the intracellular conductance 220 omega.cm. Under an electric pulse of much higher intensity, the rise of the induced potential stopped at a certain level and then slowly decreased on the microsecond time scale. This saturation and subsequent reversal of the potential development was ascribed to the introduction of finite membrane conductance, or permeabilization of the membrane, by the action of the intense pulse (electroporation). Detailed analysis indicated the following: already at 0.5 microsecond in the rectangular electric pulse, the two sides of the egg facing the positive and negative electrodes were porated and gave a high membrane conductance in the order of 1 S/cm2; the conductance on the positive side appeared higher. Thereafter, the conductance increased steadily, reaching the order of 10 S/cm2 by 1 ms. This increase was faster on the negative-electrode side; by 1 ms the conductance on the negative side was more than twice that on the positive side. The recovery of the porated membrane after the pulse treatment was assessed from the membrane conductance estimated in a second electric pulse of a small amplitude. At least two recovery processes were distinguished, one with a time constant of 7 microseconds and the other 0.5 ms, at the end of which the membrane conductance was already < 0.1 S/cm2.

Full text

PDF
1789

Images in this article

1791FIGURE 1
on p.1791

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benz R., Zimmermann U. Pulse-length dependence of the electrical breakdown in lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Apr 24;597(3):637–642. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90236-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benz R., Zimmermann U. The resealing process of lipid bilayers after reversible electrical breakdown. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jan 8;640(1):169–178. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90542-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chambers E. L., de Armendi J. Membrane potential, action potential and activation potential of eggs of the sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Aug;122(1):203–218. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90575-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang D. C., Reese T. S. Changes in membrane structure induced by electroporation as revealed by rapid-freezing electron microscopy. Biophys J. 1990 Jul;58(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82348-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chernomordik L. V., Sukharev S. I., Popov S. V., Pastushenko V. F., Sokirko A. V., Abidor I. G., Chizmadzhev Y. A. The electrical breakdown of cell and lipid membranes: the similarity of phenomenologies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Sep 3;902(3):360–373. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehrenberg B., Farkas D. L., Fluhler E. N., Lojewska Z., Loew L. M. Membrane potential induced by external electric field pulses can be followed with a potentiometric dye. Biophys J. 1987 May;51(5):833–837. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83410-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grinvald A., Hildesheim R., Farber I. C., Anglister L. Improved fluorescent probes for the measurement of rapid changes in membrane potential. Biophys J. 1982 Sep;39(3):301–308. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84520-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hibino M., Shigemori M., Itoh H., Nagayama K., Kinosita K., Jr Membrane conductance of an electroporated cell analyzed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J. 1991 Jan;59(1):209–220. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82212-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kinosita K., Jr, Ashikawa I., Saita N., Yoshimura H., Itoh H., Nagayama K., Ikegami A. Electroporation of cell membrane visualized under a pulsed-laser fluorescence microscope. Biophys J. 1988 Jun;53(6):1015–1019. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83181-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinosita K., Jr, Itoh H., Ishiwata S., Hirano K., Nishizaka T., Hayakawa T. Dual-view microscopy with a single camera: real-time imaging of molecular orientations and calcium. J Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;115(1):67–73. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kinosita K., Jr, Tsong T. Y. Formation and resealing of pores of controlled sizes in human erythrocyte membrane. Nature. 1977 Aug 4;268(5619):438–441. doi: 10.1038/268438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kinosita K., Jr, Tsong T. Y. Voltage-induced conductance in human erythrocyte membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Jul 5;554(2):479–497. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kinosita K., Jr, Tsong T. Y. Voltage-induced pore formation and hemolysis of human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Dec 1;471(2):227–242. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90252-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rossignol D. P., Decker G. L., Lennarz W. J., Tsong T. Y., Teissie J. Induction of calcium-dependent, localized cortical granule breakdown in sea-urchin eggs by voltage pulsation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Dec 19;763(4):346–355. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sowers A. E. Fusion events and nonfusion contents mixing events induced in erythrocyte ghosts by an electric pulse. Biophys J. 1988 Oct;54(4):619–626. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)82997-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tekle E., Astumian R. D., Chock P. B. Electroporation by using bipolar oscillating electric field: an improved method for DNA transfection of NIH 3T3 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4230–4234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tsong T. Y. Electroporation of cell membranes. Biophys J. 1991 Aug;60(2):297–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82054-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zimmermann U. Electric field-mediated fusion and related electrical phenomena. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Nov 30;694(3):227–277. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(82)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES