Skip to main content
Journal of Neuroinflammation logoLink to Journal of Neuroinflammation
. 2025 Nov 18;22:274. doi: 10.1186/s12974-025-03568-3

Age-related inflammatory changes and perineuronal net dynamics: implications for aging

Zachary A Colon 1,2, Shannon C Chan 1,3, Kathleen A Maguire-Zeiss 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC12628600  PMID: 41254697

Abstract

Background

Healthy aging alone can lead to cognitive decline, decreased brain size, protein aggregation, accumulation of senescent cells and neuroinflammation. Furthermore, age is the primary risk factor for several neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. Age-related neuroinflammation, as known as inflammaging, is thought to restrict brain plasticity. Perineuronal nets (PNNs), specialized extracellular matrix structures surrounding fast-spiking parvalbumin (PV) interneurons, regulate plasticity and protect neurons from oxidative stress. Given the known impact of inflammaging on neural circuits, this study examines age-associated changes in PNN homeostasis, glial activation, and neuroinflammation in two brain regions relevant to age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

Methods

We analyzed young (4-month-old) and aged (22-month-old) C57BL/6J male mice for several behavioral phenotypes [hippocampal-dependent spatial learning using the Barnes maze; locomotion and anxiety-related behaviors using Open field and T-maze]. Using immunostaining, PNNs (Wisteria floribunda agglutinin and aggrecan), PV interneurons, and microglial activation (Iba1) were quantified in both the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. Glial morphology was examined using a battery of cell body, branching, and endpoint analyses. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to analyze changes in the gene expression of inflammatory and extracellular matrix markers.

Results

Aged mice exhibited hippocampal-dependent memory deficits without alterations in locomotion or anxiety-related behavior. PNN counts increased in the aged hippocampus, particularly in CA2, with a higher proportion of WFA+ and aggrecan+ PNNs. In contrast, PNN homeostasis was maintained in the dorsal striatum. In general, Aged mice showed increases in microglial activation and a subset of inflammatory markers. We report brain region- and age- specific gene expression changes in complement, matrix metalloproteinases, and other inflammatory markers. Aged striatal microglia displayed an activated morphology with larger cell bodies and reduced branching, as well as increased expression of markers for microgliosis (Iba1, TREM2, CD68).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that aging differentially affects neuroinflammation and PNN integrity across brain regions. The hippocampus exhibits PNN accumulation, neuroinflammation, and behavioral changes, whereas the striatum maintains PNN homeostasis concurrent with increased microglial activation. This work suggests that neuroinflammation contributes to age-related changes in PNNs and behavior underscoring the importance of region-specific therapeutic strategies targeting PNN regulation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-025-03568-3.

Keywords: Inflammaging, Neuroinflammation, Parvalbumin, Hippocampus, Striatum

Background

Age remains the predominant risk factor for several neurodegenerative disorders [1, 2]. Despite this, several models of neurodegenerative disorders fail to incorporate the effects of normal aging on the brain. According to the World Health Organization, the global population of individuals aged 60 and older is projected to double to 2.1 billion by 2050 [3], presenting age as an expected risk factor to grow in the upcoming years. This demographic shift underscores the urgent need to understand the effects of normal brain aging.

Inflammaging is the chronic, low-grade inflammation that typically accompanies aging [4]. The term “inflammaging,” a combination of “inflammation” and “aging,” describes the systemic inflammatory state observed in elderly individuals that is thought to also contribute to age-related disease pathology [4]. This state is characterized by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and sustained activation of the innate immune system. Inflammaging represents a significant factor contributing to the pathogenesis of age-related diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome, although it is unclear if these diseases are a manifestation of inflammaging or simply an acceleration in age-related disease pathology [4]. Recent human plasma proteomics analyses have identified age-related alterations to the brain and immune system as significant indicators of mortality and longevity [5]. Several mechanisms contribute to inflammaging. For example, senescent cells accumulate with age and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and proteases, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype [2]. Immunosenescence causes the aging immune system to undergo functional changes, including reduced adaptive immune responses and increased activation of the innate immune system, resulting in a heightened inflammatory state. In addition, age-related organelle dysfunction leads to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), protein accumulation and activation of inflammatory signaling pathways [6, 7]. Likewise, persistent infections or reactivation of latent pathogens will drive chronic immune activation and inflammation. Whether intrinsic or extrinsic, these factors all contribute via multiple mechanisms to an age-related neuroinflammatory profile in the brain.

As chronic inflammation is one hallmark of aging (reviewed in [7]) it is not surprising that circulating levels of cytokines, like IL-6, have been identified as biomarkers for inflammaging associated with an increase in mortality [8]. In terms of the brain, less is known about the neuroinflammaging profile. In rodent models, studies show that inhibition of TNF-alpha signaling, the inflammasome, and prostaglandin signaling all improve cognition, motor performance, and the neuroinflammatory milieu [911]. This along with the fact that aging is the greatest risk factor for two common age-related neurodegenerative disorders, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, drove us to investigate the neuroimmune profile of brain regions associated with these disorders [12].

Interestingly, one common biological process associated with immune system aging, brain aging, and brain function is extracellular matrix regulation (ECM; [13, 14]). Failure of the brain to properly maintain ECM modulation results in a decrease in brain circuit plasticity (reviewed in [15]). It was recently reported, in a large human plasma proteomic study, that changes in circulating extracellular matrix protein levels are associated with brain aging [5], in particular this study found an association with increased brevican and decreased matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) in ‘youthful brain agers’. Brevican is found in perineuronal nets (PNNs), a specialized extracellular matrix structure which enwraps the cell body and proximal dendrites of neurons providing structural support, regulating plasticity, and protecting the neuron from oxidative stress [1618]. PNNs are sculpted by a class of endopeptidases called MMPs which degrade various components of the matrix [19] and can be upregulated in neuroinflammation. Furthermore, PNN components and MMPs are made by glia and altered in various disease states.

PNNs often envelop fast-spiking parvalbumin (PV) interneurons and these neurons are present in both the striatum and hippocampus. These interneurons are important for maintaining the excitatory/inhibitory balance required for the timing and synchronization of neuronal circuits through modulation, sparse encoding, and pattern separation [20]. Dysfunction of these cells has previously been linked to epilepsy, schizophrenia, and autism [21, 22], as well as PD [23] and AD [24]. Furthermore, both aging and neuroinflammation are implicated in PNN dysfunction and changes in PNNs can alter the synaptic plasticity of PV interneurons [25], so the homeostasis of PNNs is hypothesized to be important for the maintenance of neuronal circuits.

Little is known regarding the combination of regional differences in PNNs, neuroinflammation, and PV neuron numbers in aging. Therefore, in this study we utilized 4-month-old adult mice (Young) and 22-month-old mice (Aged), an age equivalent to humans aged 60–70 years [26], to investigate age-associated inflammation, PNN alterations, and PV neuron number in the dorsal striatum and hippocampus. Here we report both age-related and region-specific changes in neuroinflammation, PNN homeostasis, and glial morphology. Taken together, this work suggests that aging has differential effects in the brain, with some areas more vulnerable to inflammaging than others.

Materials and methods

Animals

C57BL/6J male mice (Jackson Laboratories, JAX#000664) were housed in the Georgetown University Division of Comparative Medicine facilities under a 12 h light/dark cycle with food and water available ad libitum. Cohorts of mice were aged to 4-months (Young) or 22-months (Aged). Five animals per group (N = 5) were used in accordance with the Georgetown University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and National Institutes of Health ethical guidelines.

Behavioral testing

Behavioral testing was conducted in the Georgetown University Department of Neuroscience behavioral facilities between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. Mice were habituated to handling and testing locations for one week before behavioral assessments. Testing occurred over 14 days before tissue collection, with a randomized testing order.

Barnes maze

Spatial learning and memory were assessed using a standard Barnes maze (92 cm diameter, 20 holes, Stoelting Co.) with four fixed extra-maze visual cues (triangle, square, circle, star). Mice were trained over 4 consecutive days with 3 trials per day (5 min/trial, 60-minute inter-trial intervals). If a mouse failed to locate the escape hole, it was guided into it at the end of the trial and allowed to remain there for 30 s. Twenty-four hours after the final training session, a 5-minute probe trial was conducted with the escape box removed. Behavior was recorded and analyzed for latency to the target hole, time spent in the target zone and each quadrant, and search strategy. Search strategies were characterized as the following: random (animal moves back and forth across the platform until the escape hole was found, serial (animals traveled around the periphery of the maze until they found the correct hole in a systematic pattern), or direct (animals moved to escape hole directly with less than two errors [27].

Open field

The Open field test assessed general activity, anxiety, and exploratory behavior. Mice were placed in a 45 cm × 45 cm × 50 cm enclosed arena for 5 min, and total distance traveled, speed, time spent in the inner zone versus the periphery, and rearing/grooming frequency were recorded. Increased inner zone activity indicated reduced anxiety.

T-maze

The T-maze was used to assess working memory and decision-making. Mice were placed in the start arm facing away from the decision point. Following a 180° turn, the start door was removed to begin the trial. Mice were allowed to freely choose one of the two goal arms. Upon entry, the selected arm was closed off, and the mouse remained in the arm for 60 s before being removed. The maze was cleaned with 70% ethanol between runs. Each trial consisted of two consecutive runs separated by a brief interval. An alternation was defined as the mouse entering the opposite arm in the second run relative to its initial choice. Failure to switch arms was recorded as a non-alternation. Each mouse completed three trials, and the number of alternations and decision times were recorded.

Tissue collection

Mice were anesthetized before intracardial perfusion with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (125 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 3.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM CaCl2). Brains were hemisected, with one half fixed in 4%paraformaldehyde/4%sucrose (w/v) in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2–7.4) for 24 h before sucrose gradient saturation (20% (w/v) and 30% (w/v) sucrose in phosphate buffer). Tissue was sectioned (30-µm thick) using a sliding microtome (Model# HM-400R, MICROM GmbH) cooled using dry ice and 100% isopropanol to approximately − 70 °C to −78.5 °C and stored in cryoprotectant at −20 °C. The other half of the brain was microdissected, with the dorsal striatum and hippocampus flash-frozen at −80 °C for RNA analysis.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the dorsal striatum and hippocampus using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Catalog #74104) and transcribed into cDNA using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems, Catalog #4368814). Gene expression of inflammatory, glial, and perineuronal net markers were quantified using TaqMan primer/probe pairs. 18 S and GAPDH were used as reference genes. Fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method, with statistical analyses performed on ΔCt values.

Immunostaining

Free-floating brain sections were stained for perineuronal nets (PNNs), parvalbumin (PV) neurons, and glial cells using established protocols [28]. PNNs were stained with Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA)-fluorescein (Vector Labs, Catalog #FL-1351) or biotinylated-WFA (Vector Labs, Catalog #B-1355) depending on the experiment. Aggrecan was detected using anti-aggrecan (Millipore, Catalog #AB1031). PV neurons were labeled with an anti-parvalbumin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Catalog #P3088). Microglia were labeled with an anti-Iba1 antibody (FUJIFILM Wako, Catalog #019–19741). Secondary antibodies included Alexa Fluor-488 α-Rabbit (Invitrogen, Catalog #A-11008), Alexa Fluor-594 α-Mouse (Invitrogen, Catalog #A-21125), Alexa Fluor-594 α-Goat (Invitrogen, Catalog #A-11058), and Streptavidin-Cy5 (Invitrogen, Catalog #SA1011).

Imaging and analysis

Researchers were blinded to conditions for imaging and analysis. Exposure times and laser intensities were optimized and maintained across samples. Imaging for cell counts were performed using a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z2 microscope (20X objective). Images were stitched and processed using ZEISS ZEN (Blue Edition) software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) [29] and FIJI (ImageJ) [30]. Cell counts were performed using tiled stitched images of the regions of interest with 30% overlap and stitched via Zen Blue “Stitching” function. Regions of interest (ROI) were identified and outlined with the Allen Brain coronal mouse Atlas as a reference [31]. Mean intensity was measured via FIJI’s ‘measure’ function. Cell counts were manually counted and averaged over the total area of interest. Single-cell analyses involved 15-µm z-stacks (0.24-µm steps) of PV and PNN colocalized cells.

Single-cell microglia analysis

Microglia were imaged at 63 × (15-µm stacks, 0.3-µm steps). Confocal z-stacks were converted to 8-bit “average intensity” 2D projections. Iba1 immunofluorescence (IF) intensity was quantified using the ‘Measure’ function for both whole images and individually outlined cell bodies, with mean intensity values calculated per region and per cell. For morphological analysis, images were background subtracted (rolling ball radius: 50 pixels), thresholded (97–97.5%), binarized, and processed with a fast Fourier transform (FFT) bandpass filter (50 pixels) and unsharp mask (radius: 1.0 pixel). Noise was reduced by despeckling and outlier removal, following protocols adapted from [28, 32]. Cell bodies were manually traced using the freehand selection tool on thresholded images, and area and perimeter measurements were obtained. To assess microglial process complexity, individual cells were isolated by cropping and clearing background, with fragmented processes manually reconnected. Sholl analysis was performed using the Sholl Analysis plugin (v4.2.1) [33] in FIJI [30] on binarized cells with the following parameters: starting radius = 0 μm, ending radius = 100 μm, step size = 5 μm, and five samples per radius. The number of intersections at each radius was recorded, and averages were calculated per region and animal. Endpoint analysis was conducted by counting the number of terminal points per cell to quantify branching complexity. All quantitative measures, including IF intensity, soma morphology, Sholl intersections, and endpoints, were averaged across cells for each region and animal and used for group-level statistical comparisons.

Colocalization analysis

Colocalization was performed using the Just Another Colocalization Plugin (JaCoP) [34] in FIJI. PV+:WFA+, PV+:ACAN+, and WFA+:ACAN+ colocalization were quantified to assess interactions between parvalbumin neurons and perineuronal net components. Cells were randomly selected from prior cell counts and imaged at 40× magnification as 15-µm z-stacks with 0.24-µm step sizes. Images were preprocessed with background subtraction (rolling ball radius = 20 pixels) and “average intensity” 2D projections were created for each image. ROIs were drawn to isolate PV+ cells, WFA+-labeled PNNs, or ACAN+ PNNs. For each comparison, the selected ROI channel was loaded as Image A, and the colocalized target channel as Image B in JaCoP. Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Manders’ coefficients (M1, M2), and overlap coefficients (k1, k2) were calculated. Costes’s automatic thresholding was applied to minimize bias and ensure consistent thresholding across samples and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were calculated.

Regression analysis

The relationship between [PV], [WFA], and [ACAN] was assessed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient to examine the strength of association between the targets. Simple linear regression was performed using ordinary least squares fitting and statistical significance was determined by testing whether the slope of the regression differed from zero and if the slopes between groups were significantly different. For regression analyses, total intensity of regions of interests were calculated using the tiled stitched images and normalized to acquire an intensity value per animal for [WFA], [PV], and [ACAN]. Normalized animal intensity values were plotted on x-y coordinates with the independent variable [WFA] intensity along the x-axis and dependent variable intensities along the y-axis for each region of interest. Linear regression analysis was performed for each age group to calculate the coefficient of determination (R2) and a t-test for slopes of each region was performed to identify significant relationships between the variables.

Statistical and data analyses

Normality of data distributions were assessed using GraphPad Prism’s “Normality and Lognormality Tests” module. The D’Agostino–Pearson and Anderson–Darling tests were applied, with the significance threshold set at α = 0.05. Unpaired Student t-tests, linear regression, coefficient differences t-test for slopes, one-way, two-way, or three-way ANOVAs with Tukey corrections were used where appropriate. Data are reported as mean ± SEM, with significance set at p < 0.05. Analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 10.2.3 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). Complete data for Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 is available in Supplementary Table 1, with Fig. 5 data available in Supplementary Table 2. qPCR primer sequences and catalog numbers can be found in Supplementary Table 3. Imaging resolution and metadata can be found in Supplementary Table 4.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Age-related differences in spatial memory performance in the Barnes maze. A Graphic of experimental design and behavioral testing timeline. B Latency to find the target hole during the training phase, Day 1 represents the start of behavior testing. Mice underwent four days of training with three trials per day. C Latency to find target hole during the probe trial in Young and Aged mice. D Number of target hole entries during the probe trial in Young and Aged mice. E Representative images of Young (4-month-old) and Aged (22-month-old) tracking plots during probe trials. N = 5 mice/group, data are presented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05, p-values: *<0.05, **< 0.01. Calculated using Two-way ANOVA with Tukey or two-tailed Student t-tests

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Quantification of hippocampal perineuronal nets (PNNs) and parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in Young and Aged mice. A Representative image of a stitched Aged mouse hippocampus. Representative images of Young and Aged PV+ interneuron, a PNN stained with Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA+), a PNN stained with aggrecan (ACAN+), and a merged image of all three stains. B Quantification of hippocampal cell counts for PV+ cells, WFA+ PNNs, ACAN+ PNNs, and colocalized cell counts with PV+:WFA+, PV+:ACAN+, WFA+:ACAN+, and triple-labeled staining in Young and Aged mice. (C) Percentage of PV+ cells ensheathed by a WFA+ PNN. D-E Quantification of WFA+ and ACAN+ PNNs across hippocampal subregions. Only Aged regional statistical comparisons are shown on the graph. See Supplementary Table 1 for all comparisons. N = 5 mice/group, 4–8 sections/mouse, data are mean ± SEM. p-values: *<0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001, ****< 0.0001. Calculated using Two-way ANOVA with Tukey or two-tailed Student t-tests

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Quantification of striatal perineuronal nets and PV interneurons in Young and Aged mice. A Representative image of a stitched Aged mouse dorsal striatum, Representative images of Young and Aged PV+ interneuron, a PNN stained with Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA+), a PNN stained with aggrecan (ACAN+), and a merged image of all three stains. B Quantification of cell counts for PV+ cells, WFA+ PNNs, ACAN+ PNNs, and colocalized cell counts with PV+:WFA+, PV+:ACAN+, WFA+:ACAN+, and triple-labeled staining in Young and Aged mice. C Percentage of PV+ neurons ensheathed by WFA+ PNNs. D Subregional quantification of co-labelled PV+ and WFA+ cells. E Subregional quantification of the percentage of PV+ neurons ensheathed by WFA+ PNNs. F Colocalization analysis of striatal subregions. Pearson’s coefficient of colocalized PV+:WFA+ neurons. N = 5 mice/group, 5–8 sections/mouse, data are mean ± SEM. p-values: *<0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001, ****<0.0001. Calculated using Two-way ANOVA with Tukey or two-tailed Student t-tests

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Regression analyses between WFA+ intensity with ACAN+ and PV+ interneurons in the hippocampus and striatum. AB Linear regression analysis of WFA+ intensity versus PV+ intensity in Young and Aged mice in the striatum and hippocampus, respectively. CD Linear regression analysis of WFA+ intensity versus ACAN+ intensity in the striatum and hippocampus, respectively. E Summary of R² values, slopes, and p-values for the coefficient differences t-test for slopes for each condition. Data was normalized before regression, and the gray dotted line represents linear regression for total samples and t-test comparison of slopes performed. p-values: **< 0.01, ***< 0.001

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Age-related alterations in microglial activation and morphology. A Representative images of Iba1+ microglia in the hippocampus of an Aged mouse. B Mean Iba1+ fluorescence intensity for the total striatum. C Quantification of Iba1+ intensity per cell in the striatum and hippocampus of Young and Aged mice. D Quantification of Iba1+ intensity per cell by striatal subregion. E Quantification of cell body area in the striatum and hippocampus of Young and Aged mice. F Quantification of cell body perimeter in the striatum and hippocampus of Young and Aged mice. G-H Quantification of cell body area and perimeter by striatal subregions. I Quantification of average endpoints per cell in the striatum and hippocampus of Young and Aged mice. J Sholl analyses of the branch profile (ramification) of microglia by age and region. N = 5/group with 4–14 cells/mouse. Data are mean ± SEM. p-values: *<0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001, ****<0.0001. Sholl Analysis striatal comparisons: p-values: ##<0.01, ####<0.0001. Calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey or two-tailed Student t-tests. Sholl analyses were calculated using a three-way ANOVA with Tukey

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Expression of inflammatory, glial, and PNN-related markers in Aged brains. Heatmaps for expression of (A) Glial and pattern recognition receptor marker, (B) Neuroinflammatory markers, (C) Complement-related and senescence markers, and (D) PNN components and matrix metalloproteinase markers. Heat maps represent fold change relative to Young mouse counterparts; fold change is represented in the color legend to the right of the heatmap. MMP-3 dark red represents an 18.34-fold change. p-values are represented as Aged compared to Young in the corresponding marker’s Aged box. Fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method, with statistical analyses performed on ΔCt values using Student t-tests. N = 5 mice/group. p-values: *<0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001, N.D.= Not determined

Results

Aged mice have significant deficits in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory

Since cognitive deficits are implicated with aging, neurodegeneration, and changes in the extracellular matrix [1, 15], a battery of behavioral tests were performed in the 14-days prior to the molecular analyses (Fig. 1A). To assess hippocampal-dependent visuospatial memory, we employed the Barnes maze (Fig. 1A). During the training phase, Aged mice learned to find the target hole at the same rate as Young mice except on Day 3 and this deficit was rescued on Day 4 of training (Fig. 1B). However, during the probe trial, Aged mice demonstrated a prolonged latency to locate the target hole (Fig. 1C) and exhibited fewer target hole entries (Fig. 1D) compared to Young mice. Aged mice also exhibited less efficient random search patterns to identify the missing escape hole, whereas the Young mice employed a systematic serial search strategy (Fig. 1E).

To evaluate whether these differences were due to gross locomotor, anxiety-like, and exploratory behaviors, mice underwent the Open field behavioral test. Aged mice did not exhibit significant locomotion deficits, as indicated by the lack of change in total distance traveled and mean speed (Sup. Figure 1 A-B). Anxiety levels did not differ between Aged and Young mice, evidenced by no significant differences in the number of inner zone entries or the time spent in the inner zone (Sup. Figure 1 C-D). Additionally, mice did not show any preference for specific corners (Sup. Figure 1E).

Since working memory deficits are also implicated during aging, we performed the T-maze. Aged mice did not show significant differences in the number of alternations or the latency to make a selection in both the first and second tests of each trial, suggesting that the Aged mice did not have any deficits in working memory (Sup. Figure 1F-G).

Aging affects the number of WFA+ and ACAN+ perineuronal nets and colocalization with parvalbumin cells in the hippocampus, but not in the striatum

Hippocampal-dependent memory deficits can reflect decreased plasticity within hippocampal neuronal circuits as well as deficits in the consolidation of visuospatial memory. PNNs are important for plasticity, changing in number and structure during development, in response to injury, and during aging [15, 16, 19]. Therefore, we investigated age-related changes in PNNs, specifically PNNs surrounding PV interneurons, and asked whether there are any age-related and brain region-specific alterations in PNN and PV numbers. Following immunostaining for PV (PV+), Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA+)-fluorescein labelling of PNNs and quantification (Hippocampus: Fig. 2B, Striatum: Fig. 3B), we found no significant differences in the total number of PV+ cells across the hippocampus and dorsal striatum (Figs. 2B and 3B, respectively). However, there was an increase in the number of double-labelled, PV+ WFA+, cells with aging in the hippocampus.

Because PNNs are comprised of a variety of proteoglycans and age-related changes in plasma proteoglycans was recently reported [5], we next immunostained for aggrecan (ACAN+), a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) expressed in the brain, and one that is important for PNN structural integrity and plasticity [35, 36]. In the hippocampus of Aged mice, there was a significant increase in the total number of PNNs stained with WFA and those co-stained with both WFA and aggrecan (Fig. 2B). There was also an increase with aging of triple-labeled cells (PV+:WFA+:ACAN+; Fig. 2B) in the hippocampus. Furthermore, the hippocampus of Aged mice had a significantly higher percentage of PV+ surrounded by WFA+ PNNs (Fig. 2C). When subhippocampal regions were analyzed, we found that the CA2 region had the most significant increase in the number of WFA+ and ACAN+ nets (Fig. 2D-E) and the highest increase in mean fluorescence intensity (Sup. Figure 2 A, C, E respectively) compared to the other subregions.

In contrast, there was no significant change in the total number of PNNs stained with WFA or aggrecan, nor the number of PV+ cells that contained a PNN in the dorsal striatum (Fig. 3B). Likewise, there were no significant age-related differences in total striatal PV+, WFA+, and ACAN+ intensities (Sup. Figure 2B, D, E, respectively). There was also no difference in the percentage of PV cells that colocalized with a PNN in the total dorsal striatum (Fig. 3C). However, when analyzed by subregion, the Young dorsolateral striatum (DLS) had a higher number of cells co-labelled with PV+ and WFA+ compared to both the Young dorsomedial striatum (DMS) and both regions of the Aged mice (Fig. 3D). The Young DMS also showed a significant decrease in the percentage of PV+ cells with a WFA+ PNN when compared to both regions of the Aged striatum (Fig. 3E). In the colocalization analysis, the DLS showed a stronger linear relationship between WFA+ and PV+ cells compared to the DMS (Fig. 3F). Taken together, the Aged dorsal striatum maintained overall PNN numbers, intensity, and colocalization suggesting a maintenance of PNN homeostasis within the dorsal striatum while the hippocampus showed age-related changes.

To better understand the relationship between PV cells and PNNs, regression analyses were performed. While a significant increase in PNNs and their colocalization with PV cells was observed exclusively in the hippocampus, there was a positive linear relationship with WFA+ and PV+ in each region and age group, with a significantly strong association of WFA+ and PV+ in the Aged dorsal striatum and both age groups in the hippocampus (Fig. 4A-B). In addition, the Aged mice exhibited a positive association of WFA+ and ACAN+, with the hippocampus showing a significant age-related increase, compared to no observable associations in both regions of the Young mice (Fig. 4C-D). These results suggest that aging selectively alters PNN associations in a region-specific manner and supports that there are differential vulnerabilities of neural circuits to age-related inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling.

Markers of gliosis, neuroinflammation, and PNNs show differential changes across brain regions with aging

We next investigated several biomarkers that impact inflammaging as well as PNN composition and homeostasis in the hippocampus and striatum of Young and Aged mice. As shown in Fig. 5, we parsed the genes into four biomarker categories: glial, inflammatory, complement/senescence, and PNN-related markers. Overall, we noted region-specific age-related changes in gene expression for some biomarkers but not others. Both the striatum and hippocampus showed age-related increases in the astrocyte marker, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) (Fig. 5A). Likewise, markers of neuroinflammation, including cytokines IL6 and TNFA, chemokine CCL2 (also known as RANTES [Regulated upon Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed and Secreted]), and complement-related genes (C3 and C1qa) were significantly elevated in both brain regions in the Aged mice (Fig. 5B-C). P16 (CDKN2A), often associated with cellular senescence was also elevated in Aged mice in both brain regions, but P21 (CDKN1A) did not differ between the groups (Fig. 5C).

The striatum also showed region specific age-related increases in the expression of glial-associated markers: ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2), Cluster of Differentiation 68 (CD68), CCL5 (Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), an inducible member of the gelatinase family, and ADAM17, a secreted protease that plays a role in maintenance of extracellular matrices (Fig. 5A, B & D). This suggests the aged striatum has elevated microgliosis and upregulation of several ECM remodeling genes. In contrast, TLR4, IL1B, C3 receptor (C3ar1), MMP3 (stromelysin-1), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1), an endogenous inhibitor of MMPs, were all increased with aging in the hippocampus but not the striatum (Fig. 5A-D). The Aged hippocampus also showed a decrease in the proteases MMP9 and ADAM17 (Fig. 5D). All other markers were unchanged in both brain regions in the Aged mice compared with the Young cohort.

Age-related glial changes reveal regional similarities and differences

We next conducted immunostaining analyses for protein markers of gliosis in Aged and Young mice. Using Iba1 to identify microglia, we did not find any difference in the total number of microglia between Aged and Young mice in the hippocampus and striatum (Sup. Figure 3 A-B, respectively). For total mean intensity of Iba1+ immunostaining, the Aged striatal Iba1+ intensity was significantly higher than their Young counterparts (Fig. 6B), but no change was observed in the hippocampus (Sup. Figure 3 C). To further characterize microglial activation, single-cell immunostaining analysis revealed that Aged mice exhibited higher Iba1+ intensity per microglia compared to Young mice in both the hippocampus and the striatum, with the Aged striatum exhibiting significantly higher intensities than all other groups (Fig. 6C), with the Aged dorsolateral striatum showing the highest intensity per cell (Fig. 6D).

To assess microglial morphology, which is often used as an indicator of microglial activation state [37, 38], we analyzed the average cell body area and perimeter in both the striatum and hippocampus of Young and Aged mice. In the striatum, Aged microglia displayed significantly larger cell body areas (Fig. 6E) and perimeters (Fig. 6F) compared with Young mice. When analyzed regionally within the striatum, the cell body areas were significantly increased in the dorsolateral region (Fig. 6G) while both the dorsomedial and dorsolateral microglia in Aged mice exhibited significantly larger perimeters than both regions of the Young mice (Fig. 6H). To characterize microglial processes and ramifications, we characterized the number of endpoints and branching patterns (i.e., Sholl profile). Endpoint analysis revealed that Aged striatal microglia had a significantly lower number of end-points per microglia compared to Young mice (Fig. 6I). For the Young and Aged hippocampus, there was no significant difference in the number of endpoints per microglia, and the hippocampal microglia had less endpoints per microglia than those in the striatum (Fig. 6I). To investigate the branching patterns we performed a Sholl analysis which revealed that striatal microglia in Young mice had significantly more intersections at 5- and 10-µm distances from the soma compared to microglia from the Aged group (Fig. 6J). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher number of intersections at 5–25-µm distances from the soma in microglia from the striatum compared to the hippocampus (Fig. 6J). Overall, compared to the Young striatal microglia, the Aged microglia exhibited several morphological signs of activation including increased Iba1+ expression, larger cell bodies, fewer endpoints per microglia, and a reduced branching pattern. However, compared to the Aged hippocampus, the Aged striatal microglia exhibited a larger number of intersections in the Sholl analysis. This data suggest a possible hyper-ramified activation state in which striatal microglia exhibit increased number of branches compared to hippocampal microglia, as well as an upregulation of immune-related genes often seen in chronic stress [39].

Discussion

Together, our findings underscore the complex interplay between inflammation, microglial activation and perineuronal nets in aging. A more complete understanding of these interactions is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies to mitigate the effects of inflammaging and to improve cognitive health in the elderly. Recent work in the field of aging suggests that organ dysfunction occurs at different rates and that specific measures of organ biological age are important for a more comprehensive understanding of aging (reviewed in [7]). Differences in chronological and organ biological aging are likely due to the variations in genetic background and environmental factors. Here we used a rodent model which allows for control of the genetic and environmental factors as these mice were group housed and experienced the same diet and living conditions. We also focused our study on two areas of the brain that are important for cognition and motor control, the hippocampus and the striatum, which are known to be affected in the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorders, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

We chose behavioral and molecular measures to quantify changes between adult (Young) and old (Aged) mice. In the behavioral studies we found that Aged mice displayed significant hippocampal-dependent learning impairments in the Barnes maze, as evidenced by prolonged latencies to locate the target hole and reduced target hole entries during the probe trial, indicating differences in spatial memory retention. These hippocampal-dependent memory deficits align with the age-related increase in perineuronal nets we found in the hippocampus, suggesting that plasticity is limited in the aging hippocampus. However, Aged mice did not exhibit deficits in working memory within the T-maze paradigm and the Open field test revealed no significant age-related differences in locomotion or anxiety-like behaviors. One limitation of this study is the modest sample size which may prevented us from noting more subtle changes in these behaviors, so further investigation is warranted.

Although the observed behavioral changes were mild, the hippocampus arose as an area more vulnerable to age-related behavioral changes compared with the striatum. Since aging is also associated with immune system dysfunction, we went on to interrogate markers typical of brain inflammaging. First, we concentrated on the ECM, which is known to change in many organs during aging, is often associated with senescence, and is important for normal brain function [40]. For example, in the brain, the PNN, a specialized ECM structure, helps to stabilize neurotransmitter receptors in the membrane, protects the neuron from oxidative stress and excessive calcium levels, enables cell-to-cell communication, and affects synaptic plasticity. The number and structure of the PNN influences whether plasticity can occur, such that too little or too much ECM affects neuronal function and synaptic plasticity [41]. While PNNs are not evenly distributed in the brain, a majority of GABAergic parvalbumin expressing fast-spiking interneurons are surrounded by these ECM structures which consist of a hyaluronan backbone and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) including brevican, versican, neurocan and aggrecan, as well as link proteins. Here we report an increase in Aged hippocampal PNNs, which could explain the behavioral deficits observed in these mice, since an increase in the number of PNNs is linked to decreased plasticity.

Of note, alterations in PNN components, particularly the CSPGs, are associated with age-related neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, yet little is known about CSPG composition in normal aging. It is known that the loss of the CSPG, aggrecan, destabilizes the PNN, promoting critical period-like plasticity in the adult cortex [36] suggesting that CSPG levels are important for regulating PNN structure. Here, we show that in the aged hippocampus, there is a significant increase in total number of PNNs on PV cells. Our regression analysis revealed that while WFA+ intensity, a broad marker of perineuronal nets (PNNs), maintained a consistent correlation with PV⁺ intensity across age groups, Aged mice exhibited a significant increase in the association of aggrecan-containing PNNs (ACAN⁺), an important structural CSPG. This selective enrichment of ACAN⁺ nets suggest an age-dependent remodeling of PNN composition that may constrain hippocampal plasticity. Elevated aggrecan containing PNNs may restrict plasticity by impeding axonal growth required for the integration of newly formed neurons in the dentate gyrus and the neuronal connections in the hippocampal tri-synaptic circuit [36]. Carstens et al. showed that removal of PNNs within CA2 restored plasticity in that region suggesting that the increase in both WFA+ and ACAN+-labelled nets shown here may reduce synaptic plasticity in aging [42]. Further investigation into CSPG modifications, sulfation patterns, and the interaction between PV interneurons and hippocampal inputs will help elucidate the mechanisms underlying age-related cognitive decline. Overall, in this study we show an increase in hippocampal aggrecan positive PNNs and suggest that this finding along with our behavioral data support that there is a decrease in plasticity in the aged brain.

Other than a modest positive association with WFA+ and ACAN+ in the striatum there are no age-related changes in PNN+ or PV+ cell numbers. However, when the striatum was subdivided into the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) and the dorsomedial striatum (DMS), the DLS exhibited greater PV⁺ and WFA⁺ colocalization across both age groups. While the Young DMS showed a significant decrease in PV+ ensheathed by a WFA+ PNN. This regional distinction could reflect functional specialization. The DLS supports habit formation, sensorimotor integration, and repetitive action sequences, behaviors that benefit from stable circuitry, where PNNs may serve to reinforce input from outside the striatum. By contrast, the DMS mediates goal-directed learning and action–outcome associations, processes that demand greater synaptic flexibility. PNNs begin to form during the second postnatal week and continue to accumulate with age in the brain and the difference in the Young DMS could reflect a differential maturation of PNNs during aging in the two regions [43]. This could allow for the Young mice to exhibit greater synaptic plasticity and behavioral flexibility during goal-directed learning such as during the Barnes maze, while solidifying circuits-related to habits and sensorimotor integration. Consistent with this framework, a mouse model of repetitive behaviors demonstrated an aberrant increase in PV⁺ neurons with WFA+-labelled PNNs within the DMS but not the DLS, and enzymatic reduction of these PNNs was sufficient to rescue the behavioral phenotype [44]. Together, these findings underscore persistent regional heterogeneity that reflect functionality in striatal PNN expression. However, the positive association of WFA+ and ACAN+ and difference in the Young DMS may reflect shifts in PNN or extracellular matrix composition, warranting further investigation into the nuanced molecular changes underlying PNN remodeling in the aged brain.

PNNs can be regulated by the neuroinflammatory state of the brain since CSPGs, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and enzymes that regulate MMPs are all expressed by glia and glial activation changes with aging. Our data suggests that striatal microglia, with their hyper-ramified morphology, maintain PNN homeostasis through low-level turnover facilitated by phagocytic markers (CD68) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) like matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and A disintegrin and metalloproteinase-17 (ADAM-17). While CD68 is not exclusively expressed in microglia/macrophages, it is a lysosomal-associated membrane glycoprotein, and commonly used as a marker of phagocytic microglia/macrophages in the CNS [45]. MMP-9 and ADAM-17 are both implicated in regulating microglial phagocytosis, likely through extracellular matrix remodeling which supports debris clearance and cell migration [4648]. In contrast, the hippocampus exhibited increased PNN counts, WFA+ intensity, and aggrecan colocalization in Aged mice, suggesting a less plastic environment contributing to hippocampal-dependent spatial memory deficits. MMP-3 is also critical for extracellular matrix remodeling and was upregulated in the hippocampus, however, TIMP-1, an endogenous MMP inhibitor was also increased. Of note, MMP-9 and ADAM-17 were also decreased in the hippocampus which we hypothesize is reducing overall matrix turnover and limiting hippocampal plasticity.

How the PNNs are regulated is an important question and here we showed that Aged mice had a significant increase in markers of neuroinflammation, complement activation, and cellular senescence, with clear regional specificity suggesting a role for inflammaging in the normal aging process. Notably, IL-6 and TNF-α, two key pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with inflammaging, were elevated in Aged brains. These molecules are known to disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB), activate microglia into neurotoxic states, and impair both synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis [4]. Chronic IL-6 and TNF-α have been linked to cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases with their levels correlating to disease severity [4952]. In the hippocampus, IL-6 interferes with long-term potentiation [53], while TNF-α impacts synaptic strength and dendritic spine density, contributing to reduced hippocampal volume and memory deficits [54]. Additionally, elevated IL-1β in the hippocampus is associated with amyloid and tau pathology, as it promotes neuroinflammation, disrupts synaptic function, and inhibits neurogenesis in AD patients [5557].

Additionally, we noted an upregulation in TLR-2 in Aged mice, which following activation can create a feedback loop amplifying inflammation in the brain (reviewed in [58]). TLR-2 is expressed by neurons, microglia, astrocytes, and peripheral immune cells, and triggers the NF-κB signaling pathway, promoting the release of inflammatory molecules like IL-6, TNF-α, and complement proteins [59], which we also show are increased in the aged brain. NF-κB signaling also regulates chemokine expression (i.e., CCL-2 and CCL-5) further exacerbating neuroinflammation by recruiting immune cells to the central nervous system, activating microglia, and disrupting the BBB [60]. These chemokines are also part of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, linking them to cellular senescence pathways [61]. The elevated P16 levels in the Aged mice suggest that further research is needed to determine whether microglia undergo senescence and how these inflammatory molecules tie into senescence, but this is a plausible scenario since aging is associated with the increased numbers of senescence cells [61] and is supported by our findings.

An interesting aspect of this study is the increased expression of innate immune markers, particularly complement proteins C3 and C1qa in Aged mice. These proteins, essential for synaptic pruning, debris clearance, and microglial activation, are elevated in aged mice [62]. Chronic elevations of C1qa and C3 are linked to inflammaging, though further research is needed to determine whether their role in aging is protective or detrimental. Overall, our findings underscore the intricate role of innate immune processes in aging and neuroinflammation.

This study identifies several possible glial pathways that can affect PNN homeostasis. Morphological analysis revealed that Aged microglia in the dorsal striatum shows signs of activation, including increased expression of Iba1, TREM2, CD68, greater Iba1+ intensity, larger cell bodies, and greater perimeter measurements compared to their Young counterparts. Microglial morphology is linked to their activation state, with ramified, highly branched processes characteristic of surveillant, homeostatic microglia, and retracted, amoeboid shapes indicating a reactive, pro-inflammatory phenotype [37, 39]. Transitions in morphology often reflect functional shifts, such as increased phagocytic activity or cytokine release in response to injury or disease [38]. Microglia are dynamic in their ability to switch between phenotypes in response to the environment, aging, or disease-causing pathology [3739]. There are also subcategories of microglia within different morphological phenotypes [63]. Here we report microglial morphology differences between Young and Aged mice as well as regional differences. In our study, Aged striatal microglia had larger cell bodies and a greater number of ramifications (in endpoint and Sholl analysis) compared to Aged hippocampal microglia, we suggest this hyper-ramified morphology helps maintain the extracellular matrix homeostasis we noted in the striatum. Hyper-ramified microglia are thought to be a functional intermediate or primed state of microglia activation [64] and possibly serve as an adaptive, synapse-modulating phenotype under stress conditions that could lead to neuronal circuit resilience [65]. These microglia may be important drivers in the maintenance of PNN homeostasis within the striatum during inflammaging-related conditions. The age-related decrease in endpoints and number of intersections in the Aged striatum does suggest an age-associated change in microglia morphology that may reflect a possible vulnerability during aging. We also found differential gene expressions of microgliosis and phagocytosis markers between the striatum and hippocampus. Specifically, the gene expression for markers such as Iba1, TREM2, and CD68 were significantly elevated in the striatum but not in the hippocampus. This along with increased Iba1 protein expression in the Aged striatum and gene expression of the proteases MMP-9 and ADAM-17, which are involved in the activation of inflammatory molecules and extracellular matrix remodeling, could indicate a higher level of microglial activity in the striatum. These findings suggest a heightened ability of striatal microglia to dynamically regulate PNNs in normal aging compared to hippocampal microglia. As mentioned previously, the maintenance of PNN plasticity requires a fine balance of PNN, such that too little or too much deposition can alter neuronal function.

Taken together, these findings highlight the complex interplay between neuroinflammation, immune signaling, and PNNs during normal aging, underscoring the need for further investigation into their roles in age-related cognitive decline and neurodegeneration.

Limitations and future prospects

This study has several limitations. Only male mice were utilized in this study; future research should include sex as a biological variable to provide a more comprehensive understanding. The sample size in this study was modest yet sufficient to detect significant differences related to aging, though more subtle effects may have been masked due to the study’s statistical power. While we approximated the human-equivalent age in mice, factors such as environmental influences, dietary variations, and genetic diversity that impact human aging were not fully captured in wild-type mice housed in controlled conditions designed to minimize confounding variables. Future studies should address gene expression analyses at the single-cell level to better determine the role of each cell type in aging.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study shows that aged mice exhibit significant impairments in hippocampal-dependent learning, aligning with increased PNN deposition. Changes in pro-inflammatory markers, MMPs, and markers of gliosis suggest that microglial activation influences PNN homeostasis in an age and brain region dependent manner. The striatum maintained PNN integrity, whereas the hippocampus showed increased PNN counts, which we suggest could lead to impaired spatial memory through decreased plasticity. These findings suggest that aging is characterized by region-specific changes in neuroinflammation, glial activation, and PNN homeostasis, which together may underlie the cognitive decline often observed in older individuals. This work also supports that further research is needed to explore therapeutic strategies targeting inflammaging.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (757.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2. (974.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge and thank Gianna Mamone, Javada Faison, and Fenn Suter for their assistance with sectioning tissues and blinded cell counting analyses. We would like to acknowledge Scott Litwiler for his staining and analysis of microglia cell counts; the Georgetown University Department of Neuroscience behavioral and microscopy facilities used during the study. We would like to express our gratitude to the Georgetown University Division of Comparative Medicine veterinarians and veterinary technicians for the care of the mice.

Abbreviations

Amyloid-beta

ACAN

Aggrecan

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ADAM

A disintegrin and metalloproteinase

BBB

Blood-brain barrier

C1qa

Complement component 1, q subcomponent, A chain

C3

Complement component 3

C3ar1

Complement component 3a receptor 1

CA1

Cornu Ammonis field 1

CA2

Cornu Ammonis field 2

CA3

Cornu Ammonis field 3

CCL2/MCP-1

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 or Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

CCL5/RANTES

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 or Regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted

CD68

Cluster of differentiation 68

CSPG

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan

DG

Dentate gyrus

DLS

Dorsolateral striatum

DMS

Dorsomedial striatum

Iba1

Ionizing calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1

IL-6

Interleukin

MMP

Matrix metalloproteinases

NF-κB

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells

PD

Parkinson’s disease

PNN

Perineuronal nets

PV

Parvalbumin

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

TIMP1

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1

TLR

Toll-like receptors

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TREM2

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2

WFA

Wisteria floribunda agglutinin

Zachary A. Colon

Is a fourth-year doctoral candidate in the Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (IPN) in Georgetown University’s Biomedical Graduate Education, with a Master’s in Integrative Neuroscience (Georgetown University) and a Bachelor of Science in Microbiology (University of Washington). Shannon C. Chan is a graduate of Georgetown University College of Arts & Sciences’ Department of Biology with a Bachelor of Science in Neurobiology. Kathleen A. Maguire-Zeiss is a professor and Chair of the Department of Neuroscience at Georgetown University School of Medicine, and the Director of the Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Neuroscience (IPN).

Authors’ contributions

ZC and KM designing and conceptualization, ZC performed the majority of the experiments with assistance from SC and SL for the microglia experiments. GM, JF, FS assisted with tissue processing and blinded cell counts for the PNN experiments. ZC analyzed, graphed, and wrote majority of the first draft of the manuscript with assistance of SC in writing of methods and results for microglia cell morphology experiments. ZC prepared the all the figures. ZC and KMZ wrote the revisions. All authors read, reviewed, suggested improvements, and approved the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge financial support from the National Institute of Health (R01NS108810; KMZ), GUMC Dean’s research funds and NIH-Training grants (T32GM142520 & T32NS041218; ZC).

Data availability

Data supplied in **Supplementary Tables 1 and 2** for all experiments listed in the figures. All other data will be provided upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures and experiments were approved by Georgetown University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and followed the United States’ National Institute of Health ethical guidelines. Animals were housed in Georgetown University Division of Comparative Medicine facilities with ad libitum water and food in a 12 H light/dark cycle. Animals were anesthetized and checked for reaction to aversive stimuli via tail pinch prior to perfusion.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Erkkinen MG, Kim MO, Geschwind MD. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(4):a033118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hou Y, Dan X, Babbar M, Wei Y, Hasselbalch SG, Croteau DL, et al. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(10):565–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ageing. and health. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Cited 2024 Aug 17.
  • 4.Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(10):576–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oh HSH, Le Guen Y, Rappoport N, Urey DY, Farinas A, Rutledge J, et al. Plasma proteomics links brain and immune system aging with healthspan and longevity. Nat Med. 2025;31(8):2703–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stefanatos R, Sanz A. The role of mitochondrial ROS in the aging brain. FEBS Lett. 2018;592(5):743–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hirata T, Arai Y, Yuasa S, Abe Y, Takayama M, Sasaki T, et al. Associations of cardiovascular biomarkers and plasma albumin with exceptional survival to the highest ages. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gocmez SS, Yazir Y, Gacar G, Demirtaş Şahin T, Arkan S, Karson A, et al. Etanercept improves aging-induced cognitive deficits by reducing inflammation and vascular dysfunction in rats. Physiol Behav. 2020;224:113019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Minhas PS, Latif-Hernandez A, McReynolds MR, Durairaj AS, Wang Q, Rubin A, et al. Restoring metabolism of myeloid cells reverses cognitive decline in ageing. Nature. 2021;590(7844):122–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marín-Aguilar F, Lechuga-Vieco AV, Alcocer-Gómez E, Castejón-Vega B, Lucas J, Garrido C, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome suppression improves longevity and prevents cardiac aging in male mice. Aging Cell. 2020;19(1):e13050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilson DM, Cookson MR, Van Den Bosch L, Zetterberg H, Holtzman DM, Dewachter I. Hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases. Cell. 2023;186(4):693–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Almanzar N, Antony J, Baghel AS, Bakerman I, Bansal I, Barres BA, et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse. Nature. 2020;583(7817):590–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Selman M, Pardo A, Fibroageing. An ageing pathological feature driven by dysregulated extracellular matrix-cell mechanobiology. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;70:101393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morawski M, Filippov M, Tzinia A, Tsilibary E, Vargova L. Chapter 10 - ECM in brain aging and dementia. In: Dityatev A, Wehrle-Haller B, Pitkänen A, editors. Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 207–27. (Brain Extracellular Matrix in Health and Disease; vol. 214). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444634863000104. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Sorg BA, Berretta S, Blacktop JM, Fawcett JW, Kitagawa H, Kwok JCF, et al. Casting a wide net: role of perineuronal Nets in neural plasticity. J Neurosci. 2016;36(45):11459–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cabungcal JH, Steullet P, Morishita H, Kraftsik R, Cuenod M, Hensch TK et al. Perineuronal nets protect fast-spiking interneurons against oxidative stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(22):9130–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Miyata S, Nadanaka S, Igarashi M, Kitagawa H. Structural Variation of Chondroitin Sulfate Chains Contributes to the Molecular Heterogeneity of Perineuronal Nets. Front Integr Neurosci. 2018;12. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2018.00003/full. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.De Luca C, Papa M. Looking inside the matrix: perineuronal Nets in plasticity, maladaptive plasticity and neurological disorders. Neurochem Res. 2016;41(7):1507–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wingert JC, Sorg BA. Impact of perineuronal Nets on electrophysiology of parvalbumin Interneurons, principal Neurons, and brain oscillations: A review. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2021;13:673210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruden JB, Dugan LL, Konradi C. Parvalbumin interneuron vulnerability and brain disorders. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;46(2):279–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marín O. Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(2):107–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.He Q, Zhang X, Yang H, Wang D, Shu Y, Wang X. Early synaptic dysfunction of striatal parvalbumin interneurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. iScience. 2024;27(11). Available from: https://www.cell.com/iscience/abstract/S2589-0042(24)02478-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Verret L, Mann EO, Hang GB, Barth AMI, Cobos I, Ho K, et al. Inhibitory interneuron deficit links altered network activity and cognitive dysfunction in alzheimer model. Cell. 2012;149(3):708–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bosiacki M, Gąssowska-Dobrowolska M, Kojder K, Fabiańska M, Jeżewski D, Gutowska I, et al. Perineuronal Nets and their role in synaptic homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The Jackson Laboratory. When are mice considered old? Available from: https://www.jax.org/news-and-insights/jax-blog/2017/November/when-are-mice-considered-old. Cited 2023 Feb 22.
  • 27.Rosenfeld CS, Ferguson SA. Barnes maze testing strategies with small and large rodent models. J Vis Exp. 2014;84:51194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Young K, Morrison H. Quantifying microglia morphology from photomicrographs of immunohistochemistry prepared tissue using ImageJ. J Vis Exp. 2018;136:57648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.ZEISS ZEN Microscopy Software. Available from: https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/us/products/software/zeiss-zen.html. Cited 2025 Jul 25.
  • 30.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reference Atlas:. Allen Brain Atlas: Mouse Brain. Available from: https://mouse.brain-map.org/static/atlas. Cited 2025 Jul 25.
  • 32.Green TRF, Murphy SM, Rowe RK. Comparisons of quantitative approaches for assessing microglial morphology reveal inconsistencies, ecological fallacy, and a need for standardization. Sci Rep. 2022;12:18196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferreira TA, Blackman AV, Oyrer J, Jayabal S, Chung AJ, Watt AJ, et al. Neuronal morphometry directly from bitmap images. Nat Methods. 2014;11(10):982–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolte S, Cordelières FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc. 2006;224(3):213–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ueno H, Fujii K, Suemitsu S, Murakami S, Kitamura N, Wani K, et al. Expression of Aggrecan components in perineuronal Nets in the mouse cerebral cortex. IBRO Rep. 2018;4:22–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rowlands D, Lensjø KK, Dinh T, Yang S, Andrews MR, Hafting T, et al. Aggrecan directs extracellular Matrix-Mediated neuronal plasticity. J Neurosci. 2018;38(47):10102–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nayak D, Roth TL, McGavern DB. Microglia development and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:367–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Colonna M, Butovsky O. Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:441–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vidal-Itriago A, Radford RAW, Aramideh JA, Maurel C, Scherer NM, Don EK, et al. Microglia morphophysiological diversity and its implications for the CNS. Front Immunol. 2022;13:997786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Levi N, Papismadov N, Solomonov I, Sagi I, Krizhanovsky V. The ECM path of senescence in aging: components and modifiers. FEBS J. 2020;287(13):2636–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lorenzo Bozzelli P, Alaiyed S, Kim E, Villapol S, Conant K. Proteolytic remodeling of perineuronal nets: effects on synaptic plasticity and neuronal population dynamics. Neural Plast. 2018;2018(1):5735789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Carstens KE, Phillips ML, Pozzo-Miller L, Weinberg RJ, Dudek SM. Perineuronal Nets suppress plasticity of excitatory synapses on CA2 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2016;36(23):6312–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee H, Leamey CA, Sawatari A. Perineuronal Nets play a role in regulating striatal function in the mouse. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Briones BA, Pitcher MN, Fleming WT, Libby A, Diethorn EJ, Haye AE, et al. Perineuronal Nets in the dorsomedial striatum contribute to behavioral dysfunction in mouse models of excessive repetitive behavior. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021;2(4):460–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Uff CEG, Patel K, Yeung C, Yip PK. Advances in visualizing microglial cells in human central nervous system tissue. Biomolecules. 2022;12(5):603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Könnecke H, Bechmann I. The role of microglia and matrix metalloproteinases involvement in neuroinflammation and gliomas. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:914104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hashimoto A, Kawamura N, Tarusawa E, Takeda I, Aoyama Y, Ohno N et al. Microglia enable cross-modal plasticity by removing inhibitory synapses. Cell Reports. 2023;42(5). Available from: https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/abstract/S2211-1247(23)00394-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Cheung SW, Bhavnani E, Simmons DG, Bellingham MC, Noakes PG. Perineuronal Nets are phagocytosed by MMP-9 expressing microglia and astrocytes in the SOD1G93A ALS mouse model. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2024;50(3):e12982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dobbs RJ, Charlett A, Purkiss AG, Dobbs SM, Weller C, Peterson DW. Association of Circulating TNF-α and IL-6 with ageing and parkinsonism. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100(1):34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tansey MG, Wallings RL, Houser MC, Herrick MK, Keating CE, Joers V. Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(11):657–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Plantone D, Pardini M, Righi D, Manco C, Colombo BM, De Stefano N. The role of TNF-α in alzheimer’s disease: A narrative review. Cells. 2023;13(1):54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS, Leisgang AM, Salazar AM, Lamb BT. Inflammation as a central mechanism in alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018;4:575–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li AJ, Katafuchi T, Oda S, Hori T, Oomura Y. Interleukin-6 inhibits long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1997;748(1):30–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu Y, Zhou LJ, Wang J, Li D, Ren WJ, Peng J, et al. TNF-α differentially regulates synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and spinal cord by Microglia-Dependent mechanisms after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci. 2017;37(4):871–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen Z, Balachandran YL, Chong WP, Chan KWY. Roles of cytokines in alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(11):5803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kitazawa M, Cheng D, Tsukamoto MR, Koike MA, Wes PD, Vasilevko V, et al. Blocking IL-1 signaling rescues Cognition, attenuates Tau Pathology, and restores neuronal β-Catenin pathway function in an alzheimer’s disease model. J Immunol. 2011;187(12):6539–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ng A, Tam WW, Zhang MW, Ho CS, Husain SF, McIntyre RS, et al. IL-1β, IL-6, TNF- α and CRP in elderly patients with depression or alzheimer’s disease: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hayward JH, Lee SJ. A decade of research on TLR2 discovering its pivotal role in glial activation and neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Exp Neurobiol. 2014;23(2):138–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hajishengallis G, Lambris JD. More than complementing tolls: Complement–Toll-like receptor synergy and crosstalk in innate immunity and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2016;274(1):233–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang W, Xiao D, Mao Q, Xia H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chinta SJ, Woods G, Rane A, Demaria M, Campisi J, Andersen JK. Cellular senescence and the aging brain. Exp Gerontol. 2015;68:3–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Carpanini SM, Torvell M, Morgan BP. Therapeutic Inhibition of the Complement System in Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Wei Y, Li X. Different phenotypes of microglia in animal models of alzheimer disease. Immun Ageing. 2022;19(1):44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Reddaway J, Richardson PE, Bevan RJ, Stoneman J, Palombo M. Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency. Front Neuroinform. 2023;17. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroinformatics/articles/10.3389/fninf.2023.1211188/full. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Fujikawa R, Jinno S. Identification of hyper-ramified microglia in the CA1 region of the mouse hippocampus potentially associated with stress resilience. Eur J Neurosci. 2022;56(8):5137–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1. (757.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2. (974.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data supplied in **Supplementary Tables 1 and 2** for all experiments listed in the figures. All other data will be provided upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Journal of Neuroinflammation are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES