Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Nov 19;20(11):e0335180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335180

From gym to joy: The serial mediation of motor competence and health literacy in Chinese university students’ exercise-life satisfaction pathway

Shao-Shuai Ma 1, Zhe Zhu 2, Dongsheng Cai 3, Chen-Xi Li 3, Ya-Xing Li 1, Bo Li 3, Sai Zhu 4, Jiaxian Geng 5,*
Editor: Henri Tilga6
PMCID: PMC12629451  PMID: 41259291

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the impact of exercise adherence on life satisfaction among Chinese university students and to explore the mediating roles of motor-skill competence and health literacy. The ultimate goals are to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between physical activity and well-being, and to inform the development of targeted interventions that promote holistic student development.

Method

A total of 15,031 valid responses were extracted from a national university-student survey database. All variables were assessed with standardized questionnaires. Data were analyzed with SPSS 27.0. Promoting the physical and mental well-being and holistic development of students has become a policy priority that commands national attention, public concern, and sustained governmental focus, and the PROCESS macro v4.0.

Result

Exercise adherence, life satisfaction, motor-skill competence, and health literacy were positively intercorrelated. Exercise adherence significantly and positively predicted university students’ life satisfaction. The indirect effect along Path 1—exercise adherence → motor-skill competence → life satisfaction—was 0.003, accounting for 1.1% of the total effect. The indirect effect along Path 2—exercise adherence → health literacy → life satisfaction—was 0.067, accounting for 26.25% of the total effect. The indirect effect along Path 3—exercise adherence → motor-skill competence → health literacy → life satisfaction—was 0.001, accounting for 0.28% of the total effect.

Conclusion

The study findings reveal that exercise adherence has a positive direct effect on university students’ life satisfaction and also exerts an indirect effect through the sequential mediation of motor-skill competence and health literacy. These results provide empirical evidence of the complex interplay between physical activity, skill development, and mental health.

1. Introduction

Promoting the physical and mental well-being and holistic development of students has become a policy priority that commands national attention, public concern, and sustained governmental focus [13]. The eighth National Survey on Students’ Physical Fitness and Health, released in 2021, reported a gradual increase in the proportion of students achieving “excellent” or “good” physical-fitness standards; this improvement was most pronounced among junior-high-school students following the reform of the physical-examination admission policy. University students, however, lack an equivalent mandatory physical-fitness assessment comparable to the senior-high-school entrance examination, and both their physical-fitness levels and overall physical capacity have declined [4]. This downward trend in university students’ physical health not only signifies a regression in objective physiological indicators but also indirectly erodes their life satisfaction [5,6]. On the path toward the ambitious Healthy China 2030 goals, university students’ life satisfaction is pivotal not only for individual growth and happiness but also for social stability and long-term national development [710]. Comparisons between the 2022 and 2024 China College Student Satisfaction Surveys indicate that the proportion of students who reported being “relatively satisfied” with campus life rose from 78.6% to 83.4%, suggesting an overall upward trajectory. Yet, most respondents focused on canteen food quality, dormitory hygiene, and administrative services, paying limited attention to their own physical and psychological health. Consequently, while their evaluations of university life improved, their bodies increasingly “expressed dissatisfaction” [1113]. Against this backdrop, a deeper investigation into the determinants of university students’ life satisfaction is urgently warranted.

Life satisfaction, the core cognitive component of subjective well-being, captures individuals’ global appraisal of life quality and plays a pivotal role in emotional regulation and psychological adaptation [1416]. Within this framework, the persistent nature of exercise behavior—commonly termed exercise adherence—has emerged as a key lens through which to examine the psychological benefits of physical activity among university students [17,18]. Exercise adherence is defined as the behavioral process by which an individual engages in physical exercise continuously and regularly over an extended period, with emphasis on tangible behavioral outcomes [19]. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates a robust association between physical exercise and life satisfaction, a linkage that appears to be underpinned by the formation of stable behavioral habits and the cumulative accrual of psychological resources [2022]. A longitudinal study by Wang revealed that students who maintained exercise participation for more than six months reported significantly greater gains in life satisfaction than their short-term counterparts [23]. Complementing this finding, Li demonstrated that when exercise frequency was sustained at four or more sessions per week. Each session exceeded 45 min, and individuals exhibited pronounced improvements in goal attainment and self-efficacy—psychological attributes that directly enhance life satisfaction [24]. Drawing on the self-determination theory advanced by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan [25], exercise adherence is posited to foster a positive psychological cycle by satisfying three basic psychological needs: autonomy, through the sense of control derived from regular exercise; competence, via progressive improvements in motor-skill mastery; and relatedness, cultivated within exercise-oriented social networks. The sustained accumulation of such psychological capital equips individuals with greater resilience against external stressors, thereby deepening their positive evaluation of life. Accordingly, we advance Hypothesis 1: Exercise adherence will significantly predict university students’ life satisfaction.

Motor-skill competence denotes the integrated capacity for transferable movement patterns that individuals acquire through systematic practice [26]. Gentile’s motor-learning theory posits that such mastery requires repeated practice, cumulative experience, and continuous feedback [27]; accordingly, it depends not only on the accrual of repetitions but also on the learner’s cognitive reconstruction and adaptive adjustment of movement patterns [28]. Sustained exercise adherence supplies the indispensable practice volume for skill refinement, whereas improved proficiency enhances psychological adaptation via two synergistic pathways—increased self-efficacy and heightened achievement motivation—thereby exerting a positive effect on life satisfaction [6,29,30].

Viewed through the lens of Locke and Latham’s goal-setting theory, the progressive mastery of motor skills can be construed as a series of “stepwise goal attainments.” Each incremental success satisfies the need for competence posited by self-determination theory, fostering positive self-appraisals of ability that generalize to evaluations in other life domains [3133]. Moreover, advanced motor-skill competence endows individuals with a sense of bodily control and performance confidence that effectively buffers the psychological impact of stressful events, initiating the chained reaction “exercise adherence → kill improvement → psychological-capital accumulation → optimized life satisfaction” [34]. On this basis, we propose Hypothesis 2: Motor-skill competence mediates the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction.

Health literacy is defined as the capacity to access, understand, and apply health-related information to make appropriate health decisions [35]. Sustained exercise adherence not only enhances physical fitness but also deepens individuals’ understanding of exercise-science principles, nutritional management, and mind–body interactions through repeated health-behavior practice, thereby systematically elevating health-literacy levels [36,37]. In a national sample, Yu observed that university students scored highest on health-knowledge tests yet reported the lowest levels of actual health behavior [38]; consequently, poor dietary choices, physical inactivity, and irregular lifestyles frequently place their health status “on red alert.” Li’s further analyses revealed that improvements in physical fitness foster scientifically informed exercise awareness and encourage students to priorities their health in daily life; in turn, this deliberate engagement in evidence-based physical activity enhances physical capacity, facilitates academic and occupational functioning, and ultimately exerts a positive influence on life satisfaction [39]. Accordingly, we propose Hypothesis 3: Health literacy mediates the association between exercise adherence and life satisfaction.

Motor-skill competence and health literacy are significantly and positively correlated. Sun reported that only 3.86% of university students were classified as having high physical-activity levels, yet 45.65% of these highly active students demonstrated adequate health literacy [40]. Building on this finding, we hypothesize that motor-skill competence may exert an indirect effect on life satisfaction through health literacy, and that exercise adherence may further influence life satisfaction via the serial pathway of motor-skill competence followed by health literacy. We therefore propose Hypothesis 4: Motor-skill competence and health literacy serially mediate the relationship between exercise adherence and university students’ life satisfaction.

In summary, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking university students’ exercise adherence to their life satisfaction, we constructed a theoretical model that specifies the pathways of influence; this model is depicted in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Mediational model of variables.

Fig 1

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

The study’s sample encompassed multiple provinces and universities, providing broad representation. However, the uneven distribution of participants across gender and grade levels may affect the generalizability of the findings. Specifically, the sample included a higher proportion of female students and students from higher grade levels. This uneven distribution may introduce sampling bias, potentially affecting the representativeness of the results. To address this, we conducted stratified analysis by gender and grade level to control for these differences. We acknowledge this limitation and discuss its potential impact on the study’s generalizability in the Discussion section.

We use a large-scale cross-sectional survey study, using questionnaire star software, and the scales used are mature scales that can be applied to college students. The recruitment period for the study spanned from 08/10/2024 to 09/11/2024, with the subsequent questionnaire survey being conducted from 11/11/2024 to 24/11/2024. The study protocol for this study received approval from the ethics committee at Nantong University and was documented under approval number 2022(70). Prior to commencing the formal investigations and testing, the researchers obtained informed consent from all the participants involved in the study. Before survey administration, all participants provided written informed consent through digital signature on the online questionnaire platform. The consent form explicitly outlined: (a) research purpose, (b) voluntary participation nature, (c) confidentiality protocols, and (d) data usage terms in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants were full-time students enrolled in regular higher-education institutions located in mainland China; the institutional roster followed the Ministry of Education’s “National List of Regular Higher-Education Institutions” (current to 20 June 2024). Sampling criteria were:

  • (a)

    campuses situated in the provinces of Beijing, Chongqing, Anhui, Gansu, Guizhou, Henan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangxi, Inner Mongolia, and Shaanxi;

  • (b)

    age 18–22 years;

  • (c)

    complete data on the four core variables (exercise adherence, life satisfaction, motor-skill competence, and health literacy).

After listwise deletion, 15,031 valid cases remained. The sample spans multiple provinces and institutional types, ensuring broad representativeness; details are reported in Table 1.

Table 1. Sample distribution table.

Variables n %
Gender
Male 6353 42.3
Female 8678 57.7
Grade Level
Freshman 9386 62.4
Sophomore 5138 34.2
Junior 445 3.0
Senior 62 0.4

2.2. Instruments

  • (1)

    Exercise Adherence Scale

Exercise adherence was assessed with Gu’s 2016 Physical Exercise Adherence Scale [41]. The scale comprises three dimensions—behavioral engagement, effort expenditure, and emotional experience—and contains seven items rated on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Higher summed scores indicate greater adherence. In the present sample, the scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.947) [42].

  • (2)

    Life Satisfaction Scale

Life satisfaction was measured with the 13-item Satisfaction with Life Scale, revised by Ed Diener et al. [43]. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Higher summed scores indicate greater life satisfaction. Following established norms for Chinese university students, scores of 31–35 denote very high satisfaction, 26–30 denote high satisfaction, 21–25 denote moderate satisfaction, 20 denote neutral, 15–20 denote moderate dissatisfaction, 10–14 denote dissatisfaction, and 5–9 denote very high dissatisfaction [44]. In the present sample, the scale’s Cronbach’s α was 0.78 [45].

  • (3)

    Motor-Skill Competence Scale

Motor-skill competence was assessed based on the “Youth Motor-Skill Proficiency Standards and Testing Methods” published by Chen et al. [46]. Participants were surveyed regarding their proficiency in specific sports skills using the following question [47]: “How many sports skills are you proficient in (e.g., basketball, football, volleyball, martial arts, taekwondo, table tennis, badminton, swimming, gymnastics, dance, ice skating, ice hockey, skipping rope, roller skating, etc.)?” Response options were 0, 1, or 2 or more sports. However, this single-item measure may not fully capture the complexity of motor-skill competence, which involves multiple dimensions such as strength, coordination, and accuracy. Additionally, the reliability and validity of this measure were not established in this study, which may limit the accuracy and meaningfulness of the findings related to motor-skill competence.

  • (4)

    Health Literacy Scale

Health literacy was measured with the Simplified Health Literacy Scale, revised by Sun et al. in 2024 [48]. The scale comprises three dimensions: health care, disease prevention, and health promotion. It contains nine items rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = tough, 2 = difficult, 3 = easy, 4 = very easy). Higher scores indicate better health literacy. The Health Literacy (HL) index is calculated as follows: HL index = (mean score – 1) × (50/3). In the present study, the scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.913) [48]. The scale’s construct validity was confirmed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in a Chinese population, with items loading significantly on their respective dimensions [49]. Additionally, the scale showed good convergent validity, with significant correlations with established health behavior measures. These findings, supported by previous research, confirm that the Simplified Health Literacy Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing health literacy in China [49].

2.4. Statistical methods

Common method bias was first assessed using the Harman single-factor test. The results showed that there were eight factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, and the variance explained by the first factor was 29.107%, which is below the commonly used threshold of 40%. Thus, no significant common method bias was detected in this study. Next, descriptive analysis was conducted to calculate the sample size (n), percentage, chi-square value, Cramer’s V coefficient, and differences by gender and grade for motor-skill competence and life satisfaction. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r) were then used to examine the associations between variables for correlation analysis. Subsequently, multiple linear regression analysis was performed with exercise adherence as the independent variable, life satisfaction as the dependent variable, and health literacy and motor-skill competence as control variables, producing standardized regression coefficients (β), the coefficient of determination (R²), and significance levels (P values). Finally, a chain mediation model was constructed using the PROCESS macro (Model 6) in SPSS 27.0 to test the serial mediation effect of health literacy and motor-skill competence. The Bootstrap method was employed with 5,000 resamples to calculate the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the total effect, direct effect, and indirect effects. Path significance was determined by whether the 95% CI included zero. A P value of less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

3. Result

3.1. Descriptive results

Before testing the mechanism by which exercise adherence influences life satisfaction, we first described the basic distributions of all variables. Cross-tabulations were generated for the two ordinal variables—motor-skill competence and life satisfaction—reporting sample sizes, percentages, chi-square values, and Cramer’s V. Exercise adherence and health literacy, treated as continuous variables, were summarized descriptively; higher scores indicate better status. Table 2 shows the distributions by gender and grade. Overall, 55.4% of students reported being “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with life; this proportion was higher among women (35.4%) than men (32.0%), and the gender difference was significant (χ2 = 92.143, P < 0.001). Regarding motor-skill competence, 89.7% of students had mastered at least one sport; men (92.7%) outperformed women (87.5%), χ2 = 286.644, P < 0.001. Across grades, first-year students had the highest proportion with no mastered skill (11.3%), whereas fourth-year students had the highest proportion with two or more skills (67.7%); the grade-level difference was also significant (χ2 = 44.868, P < 0.001).

Table 2. Summary of descriptive analysis results.

Variables Evaluation Level Gender Grade
Male(n = 6353) Female(n = 8678) Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
n % n % n % n % n % n %
Life Satisfaction
Very Dissatisfied 107 1.7% 76 0.9% 101 1.1% 75 1.5% 7 1.6% 0 0%
Dissatisfied 350 5.5% 426 4.9% 501 5.3% 252 4.9% 19 4.3% 4 6.5%
Basically Dissatisfied 1004 15.8% 1533 17.7% 1680 17.9% 801 15.6% 56 12.6% 0 0%
Neutral 977 15.4% 1142 13.2% 1242 13.2% 818 15.9% 53 11.9% 6 9.7%
Basically Satisfied 2033 32.0% 3076 35.4% 3235 34.5% 1703 33.1% 147 33.0% 24 38.7%
Satisfied 1363 21.5% 1937 22.3% 2022 21.5% 1122 21.8% 130 29.2% 26 41.9%
Very Satisfied 519 8.2% 488 5.6% 605 6.4% 367 7.1% 33 7.4% 2 3.2%
χ 2 92.143 81.790
P <.001 <.001
Cramer’s V 0.078 0.043
Motor-skill Competence
0item 466 7.3% 1082 12.5% 1064 11.3% 442 8.6% 36 8.1% 6 9.7%
1item 1811 28.5% 3193 36.8% 3183 33.9% 1671 32.5% 136 30.6% 14 22.6%
≥2items 4076 64.2% 4403 50.7% 5139 54.8% 3025 58.9% 273 61.3% 42 67.7%
χ 2 286.644 44.868
P <.001 <.001
Cramer’s V 0.138 0.039

3.2. Correlation analysis

Correlation analysis (Table 3) showed that all variables were positively and significantly related. Exercise adherence correlated strongly with life satisfaction (r = 0.394, P < 0.01), motor-skill competence (r = 0.259, P < 0.01), and health literacy (r = 0.464, P < 0.01). Life satisfaction had a weak positive association with motor-skill competence (r = 0.120, P < 0.01) and a strong positive association with health literacy (r = 0.367, P < 0.01). Motor-skill competence and health literacy were weakly positively correlated (r = 0.137, P < 0.01).

Table 3. Correlation Analysis.

Variables Exercise Adherence Life Satisfaction Motor-Skill Competence Health Literacy
Pearson Exercise Adherence r 1
Life Satisfaction r 0.394** 1
Motor-Skill Competence r 0.259** 0.120** 1
Health Literacy r 0.464** 0.367** 0.137** 1

Note: ** indicates P < 0.01

3.3. Mediation analysis

Using hierarchical regression, we examined total, direct, and indirect effects while controlling for gender, grade, and ethnicity. Table 4 shows that, after these controls, exercise adherence positively predicted life satisfaction (β = 0.253, SE = 0.005, t = 53.695, P < 0.001), confirming the main effect. It also positively predicted motor-skill competence (β = 0.018, SE = 0.001, t = 30.2947, P < 0.001) and health literacy (β = 0.212, SE = 0.004, t = 60.849, P < 0.001). Motor-skill competence positively predicted life satisfaction (β = 0.154, SE = 0.064, t = 2.421, P < 0.05), and health literacy strongly predicted life satisfaction (β = 0.313, SE = 0.011, t = 28.285, P < 0.001). Thus, exercise adherence significantly predicts life satisfaction, supporting H1.

Table 4. Hierarchical regression results for the chain mediation effects.

Regression equations Overall fit indices Regression coefficient significance
Outcome variable Predictor variable R R 2 F β SE t
Motor-Skill Competence 0.283 0.08 326.536
Exercise Adherence 0.018 0.001 30.295***
Gender −0.121 0.011 −11.073***
Grade 0.073 0.009 7.920***
Ethnicity 0.116 0.020 5.768***
Health Literacy 0.464 0.216 826.202
Exercise Adherence 0.212 0.004 60.849***
Motor-Skill Competence 0.120 0.047 2.575*
Gender 0.160 0.063 2.550*
Grade 0.032 0.053 0.610
Ethnicity −0.061 0.115 −0.528
Life Satisfaction 0.453 0.205 645.376
Exercise Adherence 0.183 0.005 34.703***
Motor-Skill Competence 0.154 0.064 2.421*
Health Literacy 0.313 0.011 28.285***
Gender 0.781 0.085 9.159***
Grade 0.421 0.072 5.84***
Ethnicity −0.003 0.156 −0.016
Life Satisfaction 0.403 0.162 726.737
Exercise Adherence 0.253 0.005 53.695***
Gender 0.808 0.087 9.271***
Grade 0.445 0.074 6.028***
Ethnicity 0.001 0.160 0.004

Note: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Using bias-corrected percentile bootstrapping and controlling for gender and grade, we examined the serial mediation of motor-skill competence and health literacy in the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction. Results appear in Table 5. The total effect of exercise adherence on life satisfaction was 0.253, 95% CI [0.244, 0.263]; the total direct effect was 0.183, 95% CI [0.173, 0.194], accounting for 72.40% of the total; and the total indirect effect was 0.070, 95% CI [0.063, 0.077]. Decomposed effects showed that the pathway via health literacy alone was 0.067, via motor-skill competence alone 0.003, and the serial chain (motor-skill competence → health literacy) 0.001. The model supports overall serial mediation, corroborating Hypotheses 2, 3, and 4.

Table 5. Bootstrap-based serial mediation effects on life satisfaction.

Effect Effect size BootSE BootLLCL BootULCL Proportion of total effect
Total effect 0.253 0.005 0.244 0.263
Total direct effect 0.183 0.005 0.173 0.194 72.40%
Total indirect effect 0.070 0.004 0.063 0.077 27.60%
Exercise adherence → motor-skill competence → life satisfaction 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.005 3.86%
Exercise adherence → health literacy → life satisfaction 0.067 0.003 0.060 0.073 95.14%
Exercise adherence → motor-skill competence → health literacy → life satisfaction 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 1.00%

The serial mediation path coefficients for life satisfaction are depicted in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Serial mediation model.

Fig 2

4. Discussion

This study simultaneously examined the roles of motor-skill competence and health literacy in the effect of exercise adherence on the life satisfaction of university students. Using validated scales, the relationships stipulated in Hypotheses 1–4 were fully supported. Exercise adherence influences life satisfaction through a serial chain in which motor-skill competence and health literacy sequentially mediate the effect; in other words, the impact of adherence on satisfaction is channeled and modulated by these two factors. The Healthy China 2030 blueprint advocates “integrating health into all policies,” highlighting mastery of motor skills and widespread health literacy as twin levers for national wellness [9]. Our findings indicate that both levers act as pivotal mediators in shaping university students’ life satisfaction. This pattern illustrates a prevailing tension in college health promotion—policy momentum coexists with implementation lag, and cognitive gains outpace behavioral change—yet the positive trajectory is evident: motor skills are becoming more functional, health-literacy programs are emphasizing behavioral translation, and their synergistic contribution is increasingly recognized [50].

4.1. Relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction

The present study validates H1 by demonstrating that university students’ exercise adherence is significantly and positively correlated with life satisfaction, and that adherence prospectively predicts higher satisfaction. This finding is consistent with self-determination theory, which posits that sustained exercise fulfills three basic psychological needs—autonomy, relatedness, and competence. By meeting these needs, exercise enhances perceived performance and, ultimately, life satisfaction [29]. Physiologically, habitual exercise triggers a sustained release of endorphins and serotonin while reducing cortisol levels, which directly elevates emotional tone [5153]. This biochemical shift is complemented by the psychological experience of self-efficacy. The repeated experience of “I can do this” during exercise generalizes into a broader sense of mastery over daily life.

Moreover, regular physical activity serves as a long-term emotion-regulation strategy. It provides an outlet for negative emotions, and the post-exercise drop in core body temperature helps resynchronize circadian rhythms, deepen sleep, and further improve subjective evaluations of life satisfaction [5456].

4.2. Mediating role of motor-skill competence

The study unequivocally demonstrates that motor-skill competence significantly mediates the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction among Chinese university students, robustly supporting Hypothesis 2. This finding indicates that consistent exercise not only enhances students’ physical capacity but also accelerates their mastery of movement patterns. This progress directly and significantly boosts their overall life satisfaction. The enhancement of motor-skill competence provides students with a strong sense of self-efficacy, enabling them to better integrate exercise into their daily routines and thereby improve their mental health and overall well-being.

When compared with findings in children, university students are more efficient in converting skill gains into psychological benefits. This efficiency can be attributed to their greater neuroplasticity and stronger institutional support [57,58]. These factors enable university students to more effectively translate improvements in motor skills into increased psychological satisfaction and life satisfaction.

The results of this study have significant implications for university physical education reforms. It is recommended that university physical education shift from the traditional “fitness-pass” systems to “skill-mastery” models. By using video feedback to visualize progress, universities can enhance students’ motivation to continue exercising, diversify exercise formats, and ultimately significantly improve students’ life satisfaction. This model not only enhances physical fitness but also, through the enhancement of motor-skill competence, provides lasting psychological benefits.

In summary, motor-skill competence significantly mediates the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction among Chinese university students. This finding underscores the importance of emphasizing motor-skill development in university physical education. By adopting skill-mastery models and providing supportive environments, universities can effectively enhance students’ life satisfaction and promote their holistic development.

4.3. Mediating role of health literacy

The mediation analysis reveals that health literacy significantly mediates the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction among Chinese university students, thereby supporting Hypothesis 3. Specifically, exercise adherence positively predicts health literacy, which in turn positively predicts life satisfaction. These findings are consistent with prior research indicating that exercise adherence enhances health literacy [59] and that there is a strong association between health literacy and life satisfaction [60].

During sustained exercise, students with higher health literacy can design personalized training plans and accurately interpret bodily signals. This not only helps them adjust their exercise strategies more effectively but also prolongs their exercise adherence [61]. Unlike its role in disease management among older adults [62,63], health literacy in this context emphasizes the establishment of preventive health behaviors, which are crucial for meeting the independent living demands of university life. By enhancing health literacy, students can better manage their health and become more self-reliant in their daily lives.

As students’ independent health capabilities improve through enhanced health literacy, they experience significant physical benefits, such as improved physical fitness and reduced risk of illness, as well as positive psychological changes, such as increased self-confidence and reduced stress. The increase in life satisfaction further reinforces their motivation to engage in healthy behaviors, creating a positive feedback loop. This highlights the critical role of health literacy in promoting both physical and psychological well-being and provides new insights for university physical education and health promotion programs.

In summary, health literacy significantly mediates the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction among Chinese university students. This underscores the importance of health literacy in promoting overall well-being. Universities should prioritize the development of health literacy programs to support students’ independent living skills and enhance their life satisfaction. By implementing these programs, universities can create a healthier and more positive learning environment, helping students better navigate the challenges of university life.

4.4. Serial mediating effect of motor-skill competence and health literacy

The findings confirm the serial mediation of motor-skill competence and health literacy, supporting Hypothesis 4. Sustained exercise elevates mood by releasing endorphins and improving sleep [51,64], creating an emotional milieu that facilitates skill practice. As skills advance, self-efficacy rises, generating heightened mastery and achievement during exercise [65]. Health literacy then translates these experiences into informed decisions: students who understand the exercise-health link plan training more scientifically, reduce injury risk, and maintain long-term activity, thereby enhancing quality of life [66].

Therefore, exercise adherence is associated with increased life satisfaction among university students and may indirectly influence life satisfaction through the serial pathway of motor-skill competence and health literacy.

4.5. Study limitations

This study is limited by its cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inferences. Single-time-point data collection does not allow for the observation of temporal sequences, making it difficult to establish causal relationships. Additionally, the single-item assessment of motor-skill competence may underestimate its true influence, warranting the development of a multidimensional scale in future research. Moreover, the sample consisted of Chinese university students, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The uneven distribution of participants across gender and grade levels may further affect the representativeness of the results. Caution should be exercised when applying these results to other populations due to potential cultural and educational differences.

5. Conclusion

Exercise adherence positively predicts university students’ life satisfaction, motor-skill competence, and health literacy. Both motor-skill competence and health literacy independently mediate the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction, and exercise adherence also exerts an indirect effect on life satisfaction through the serial mediation of motor-skill competence and health literacy.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all the staff and students from the participating schools and our co-operators for their assistance in data collection.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly, because data from this study may contain sensitive patient information. Data are anonymized, however, due to relatively few severe cases, patients could be identified (The Ethics Committee at Nantong University). Therefore, data from this study will be made available for researchers who meet criteria for access to confidential data. Requests may be sent to: ethics@ntu.edu.cn.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Tang C, Wang Z. The impact of sports reforms in the new era on the physical and mental health development of college students. Int J Cogn Inf Nat Intell. 2025;19(1):1–16. doi: 10.4018/ijcini.368147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pan H, Shao Y. Study on the relationship between physical education curriculum and students’ physical and mental health development. Eval Educ Res. 2024;2(6). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fukuie T, Inoue K, Yamaguchi A. Lifestyle Elements for improving mental and physical health in Japanese university students: subjective sleep quality is a common key factor. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023;18(3):303–12. doi: 10.1177/15598276231156546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Health D, Arts EM. The results of the 8th national survey on students’ physical fitness and health were released. Chin School Health. 2021;42(09):1281–2. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu Y. The Impact of College Students’ Physical Exercise Behavior on Body Self-esteem: The Mediating Effect of Life Satisfaction. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang C. A study on the impact of physical exercise on college students’ self-efficacy and life satisfaction. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bae M-H. Happiness levels and leisure life satisfaction for sports leisure activities participation: implication for physical education in Korea. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(9):2007–16. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Min M, Sik KK. The influence of university students’ participation in physical activities on their life satisfaction: Psychological well-being as the mediator variable. Basic Clin Pharm Toxicol. 2020;126:84. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Teng J, Jin Z. The inspirational study on the construction of the quality system of physical education in higher education institutions based on the “healthy China 2030” planning outline. Bull Sports Sci Technol. 2021;29(11):33–5. doi: 10.19379/j.cnki.issn.1005-0256.2021.11.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoyer D, Ochiai E, Blakey C. Charting a national path for well-being through healthy people 2030. Med Care. 2024;62(12 Suppl 1):S27–9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pan J. A study on the life satisfaction and behavior of “post-00s” college students—based on survey data analysis from 29 universities nationwide. Beijing Educ (Higher Education). 2021;(06):66–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miyakawa M, Hamashima Y. Life satisfaction and subjective health status of young carers: A questionnaire survey conducted on Osaka prefectural high school students. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2021;68(3):157–66. doi: 10.11236/jph.20-040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Findings on social science reported by investigators at Guangzhou University: Extracurricular sports participation increases life satisfaction among Chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Sci Lett. 2020;592. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kang J, Yao M, Zhang F. The relationship between digital stress and life satisfaction among college students: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Psychol Monthly. 2024;19(14):80–2. doi: 10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2024.14.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gao F e i. The relationship between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction among college students: The mediating effect of sense of security and the moderating effect of self-esteem. Chin J Health Psychol. 2022;30(01):96–101. doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2022.01.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Han DE, Park HG, An UJ, Kim SE, Kim Y-H. Emotion suppression on relationship and life satisfaction: Taking culture and emotional valence into account. J Soc Pers Relation. 2022;39(9):2766–81. doi: 10.1177/02654075221088521 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li W, Hao R, Liu G. The impact of exercise frequency on mental health: The mediating role of life satisfaction and self-rated health. In: The 12th National Conference on Sport Psychology. Tianjin, China: 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu H, Li X, Yu X, Fusheng L, Li L, Yang Y, et al. How physical exercise enhances life satisfaction in Chinese senior college students: mediating roles of self-efficacy and resilience. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1515101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1515101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen K, Cheng B. The impact mechanism of exercise motivation on college students’ exercise adherence. Hubei Sports Sci Technol. 2024;43(06):41–5. doi: 10.20185/j.cnki.1003-983X.2024.06.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Han Y, Zhang C. The relationship between physical exercise and life satisfaction among college students: The chain mediating role of general self-efficacy and sense of meaning in life. Hubei Sports Sci Technol. 2023;42(07):612–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu F, Guo L. The impact of physical exercise on life satisfaction among college students: The chain mediating role of perceived social support and cognitive reappraisal. Sports Res Educ. 2023;38(03):22–6. doi: 10.16207/j.cnki.2095-235x.2023.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li G. The impact of physical exercise on life satisfaction among college students. Heilongjiang Sci. 2022;13(23):61–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang L. A study on the influencing factors and promotion strategies of college students’ exercise adherence. 2021.
  • 24.Li X. The role of physical exercise in cultivating good behavioral habits among students. Cult Sports Technol. 2020;19:16–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Psychology IF, Education ACU, University of Rochester US. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;61. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan J, Huang J. A study on the mastery of students’ motor skills—an analysis from the students’ perspective. In: The 10th China Strength and Conditioning Science Conference. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China: 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deng D. A review of the research on the Kim Tael motor skill learning theory. Cul Sports Technol. 2020;08:229–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang T. Research on deep learning-based action recognition and quantitative assessment method for sports skills. Appl Math Nonlin Sci. 2024;9(1). doi: 10.2478/amns-2024-3073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wan X. The relationship between physical exercise and life satisfaction among college students: The mediating role of general self-efficacy and social support. 2024.
  • 30.Liu S. A comparative study of self-efficacy and life satisfaction between physical education and non-physical education college students. 2013.
  • 31.Zhang D. The impact of different goal settings on the competitive ability of junior badminton players. Shanghai University of Sport; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mo Y. A study on the impact of goal commitment on college students’ exercise behavior and physical health—based on goal-setting theory. Zhejiang Sports Sci. 2024;46(03):106–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Locke EA, Latham GP. The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Sci. 2019;5(2):93–105. doi: 10.1037/mot0000127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abbasi P, Fallahi A, Nourshahi M, Asadi Y, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Nazem-Zadeh M-R. The impact of brain functional connectivity on skill and physical performance in soccer players: a resting state fMRI study. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025;76:102741. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang L. Investigation of the level of health literacy and its influencing factors among college students. Cult Sports Technol. 2024;17:106–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guan Q. The impact of physical exercise on mental health literacy among college students in Jiangxi Province. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.König L, Kuhlmey A, Suhr R. Digital health literacy of the population in Germany and Its Association With Physical Health, Mental Health, Life Satisfaction, and Health Behaviors: Nationally Representative Survey Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024;10:e48685. doi: 10.2196/48685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu Z. A survey on the current status of health literacy among college students. J Hubei Inst Adult Educ. 2022;28(05):61–6. doi: 10.16019/j.cnki.cn42-1578/g4.2022.05.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li Q. Analysis of the impact of sports and fitness services on improving public health literacy. Contemp Sports Sci Technol. 2019;9(09):198–9. doi: 10.16655/j.cnki.2095-2813.2019.09.198 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sun P, Wang S, Sheng X, Xiao G, Luo Z. A study on the correlation analysis between health literacy and physical activity levels among college students. Anhui Sports Sci Technol. 2022;43(01):78–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gu C. A study on the organizational factors affecting members’ exercise adherence. 2016.
  • 42.Guo T, Liu L, Yang Y, Shang Y, Chen S-P. The relationship between live sports learning and exercise behavior in college students: a serial mediation model. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(4):266. doi: 10.3390/bs14040266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc Indic Res. 2013;112(3):497–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yao B, Shi S, Fang J. Current status and prospects of life satisfaction research. Acad Commun. 2011;8:218–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pavot W, Diener E. The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. J Pos Psychol. 2008;3(2):137–52. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen P. No skills, no sports. Qual Stand. 2018;06:6–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ma XK, Zhu Z, Yang Y, Yang C, Cao ZB. A study on the profile of specialized sports skills and their relationship with physical activity and physical health among adolescents in Shanghai. Sports Sci. 2022;42(12):23–8. doi: 10.16469/j.css.202212003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sun X, Lv K, Wang F, Ge P, Niu Y, Yu W, et al. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in the Chinese Population. The 24th National Conference on Psychology. Xinxiang, Henan, China: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sun X, Lv K, Wang F, Ge P, Niu Y, Yu W, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Health Literacy Scale Short-Form in the Chinese population. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15237-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Koh KT, Newman TJ, Salleh MSB. Coaching values and life skills through physical education and sports: a practical toolkit. Taylor & Francis; 2024. pp. 344. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pangkahila EA, Adiputra N, Pangkahila W, Yasa IWPS. Balanced physical exercise increases physical fitness, optimizes endorphin levels, and decrease malondialdehyde levels. Bali Med J. 2016;5(3):145–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sun W. Reasons, approaches, and methods for relieving psychological stress through physical exercise. Cult Sports Technol. 2014;(06):172. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Harro J, Eensoo D, Suvi S, Timpmann S, Ööpik V. Prolactin levels increased by physical exercise correlate with platelet monoamine oxidase activity: Evidence linking platelet MAO with serotonin release capacity. Neurosci Lett. 2025;848:138116. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2025.138116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lu L, Liu F. Analysis of the impact of emotions on students’ physical and mental health. Forum Ind Technol. 2021;20(14):104–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang X, Zheng H e, Meng L. A meta-analysis of the impact of physical exercise on the sleep quality of university students. Bull Sports Sci Technol. 2025;33(01):175–80. doi: 10.19379/j.cnki.issn.1005-0256.2025.01.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li X, Xu C, Chen W, Tian J. Physical Exercise and Sleep Quality Among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Self-Control and the Moderating Role of Mindfulness. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025;15(2):232. doi: 10.3390/bs15020232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Diao Y. A study on the development of basic motor skills and educational promotion in children aged 3 to 10. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang G, Zi Y, Li B, Su S, Sun L, Wang F, et al. The Effect of Physical Exercise on Fundamental Movement Skills and Physical Fitness among Preschool Children: Study Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yan M. A study on the chain mediating effect of health literacy and dietary behavior between physical exercise and sub-health among college students. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Megasari R, Sahid S. The impact of food literacy and health literacy on teachers’ economic well-being: the mediating role of life satisfaction. J Knowl Econ. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s13132-025-02621-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen Z. A study on the current status and relationship of sports participation and health literacy among college students in Hunan Province. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xin K, Ma C. A study on health literacy, physical exercise behavior, and their correlation among urban elderly people. Sci Technol Inf. 2022;20(13):204–7. doi: 10.16661/j.cnki.1672-3791.2112-5042-0085 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhao D, Wang J, Wang J. The impact of physical exercise on health literacy and executive function in the elderly. Chin J Gerontol. 2020;40(04):804–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li J. The relationship between peer support and sleep quality among Chinese college students: the mediating role of physical exercise atmosphere and the moderating effect of eHealth literacy. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1422026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Harrison JM, Preece LA, Blakemore CL, Richards RP, Wilkinson C, Fellingham GW. Effects of two instructional models—skill teaching and mastery learning—on skill development, knowledge, self-efficacy, and game play in volleyball. J Teach Phys Educ. 1999;19(1):34–57. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.19.1.34 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Alinejad-Tilaki A, Omidvar S, Kheirkhah F, Bakhtiari A, Gholinia H. Health literacy and its relationship with mental health and quality of life in freshmen students. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21202-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Henri Tilga

20 Aug 2025

Dear Dr. Geng,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 04 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Henri Tilga, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

4. We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. For studies involving human research participant data or other sensitive data, we encourage authors to share de-identified or anonymized data. However, when data cannot be publicly shared for ethical reasons, we allow authors to make their data sets available upon request. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

Please update your Data Availability statement in the submission form accordingly.

5. In the online submission form, you indicated that the data can be obtained from the corresponding author.

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval.

6. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

7. Please include a copy of Table 5 which you refer to in your text on page 12.

8. Please remove all personal information, ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set.

Note: spreadsheet columns with personal information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.

Additional guidance on preparing raw data for publication can be found in our Data Policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data) and in the following article: http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long.

9. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

10. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

11. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The study demonstrates clear logic, progressively revealing relationships between exercise adherence, motor competence, health literacy, and life satisfaction among university students through hypotheses, data analysis, and theoretical support. Below are considerations for the authors:

1�The cross-sectional design limits causal inference; causal language should be avoided throughout the manuscript.

2�Generalizability beyond Chinese university students requires caution due to cultural/educational differences. Address this limitation explicitly.

3�The abstract misstates the research purpose. Revise to clarify ultimate goals and expected scholarly/practical contributions.

4�Strengthen discussion responses to core questions:

(1) Do motor competence/health literacy significantly mediate exercise-life satisfaction in Chinese university students?

(2) Which factors most strongly influence exercise-life satisfaction?

5�Conclusions in the abstract must be distinct from findings.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript presents a meaningful study with a respectable sample size. Please consider the following suggestions to further enhance its quality.�

1、Methods section, while the health literacy scale demonstrated good internal consistency, the study does not provide detailed information regarding the validation of its psychometric properties, specifically its validity, within a Chinese population. The authors are encouraged to provide this information to enhance the credibility of the study.

2、Methods section, while the study’s sample encompassed multiple provinces and universities, the uneven distribution of participants across gender and grade levels may compromise the generalizability of the findings. The authors are advised to discuss the potential impact of this sampling bias on the results and clarify whether stratified analysis was conducted to control for these discrepancies.

3、Methods section, the assessment of motor skill competence relied on a single-item measure, which may not adequately capture the complexity of this construct. Furthermore, the reliability and validity of this measure were not demonstrated. Further elaboration on the rationale for using a single-item measure and a discussion of its limitations is recommended.

4、Discussion section, the study employed a cross-sectional research design, which inherently limits the ability to establish causal relationships between variables. It is recommended that this limitation be explicitly acknowledged and discussed within the discussion section.

5、Discussion section� while the results are discussed at length, the discussion section lacks in-depth analysis. It is recommended that the authors expand upon this section.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Nov 19;20(11):e0335180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335180.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 Oct 2025

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-25-40062

Title: From Gym to Joy: The Serial Mediation of Motor Competence and Health Literacy in Chinese University Students' Exercise-Life Satisfaction Pathway

Journal: PLOS One

Point-by-Point Responses to Editor

Dear Editor and dear reviewers

We are extremely grateful for your insightful comments and constructive suggestions. Your feedback has been instrumental in enhancing the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point raised and have made the necessary revisions to address them comprehensively. Below, we provide detailed responses to your comments, along with the changes we have implemented.

We believe that these revisions have significantly enhanced our work, making it more robust and comprehensive. We look forward to your continued guidance and hope that our manuscript now meets the high standards of the journal.

Thank you once again for your time and effort.

Sincerely,

On behalf of all authors

Comment #1:

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

Response# 1:

Thank you very much for your detailed review and valuable comments. I have reformatted the manuscript according to PLOS ONE’s style templates, including file naming conventions.

Comment #2:

PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will direct you to the ORCID site, where you can create a new ID or authenticate an existing ID in Editorial Manager.

Response# 2:

Thank you for reminding us of the ORCID iD requirement. I confirm that I have an ORCID iD, and I have just validated it in Editorial Manager following your instructions. I went to “Update my Information,” clicked on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field, and successfully authenticated my ORCID iD.

Comment #3:

Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

Response# 3:

Thank you for your guidance regarding the placement of the ethics statement. We have reviewed our manuscript and ensured that the ethics statement appears only in the Methods section. We have removed any instances of the ethics statement from other sections of the manuscript to comply with PLOS ONE’s requirements.

Comment #4:

We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. For studies involving human research participant data or other sensitive data, we encourage authors to share de-identified or anonymized data. However, when data cannot be publicly shared for ethical reasons, we allow authors to make their data sets available upon request. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

In the online submission form, you indicated that the data can be obtained from the corresponding author.

Response# 4:

Thank you for your guidance on data sharing. We confirm that informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article can be made available by the authors without undue reservation. We are committed to sharing de-identified data upon request, in compliance with ethical standards and PLOS ONE’s data availability policy.

We confirm that the data supporting our study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. We are committed to making our data accessible to facilitate further research and validation.

Comment #5:

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

Response# 5:

Our study received ethics approval from Nantong University (approval number 2022(70)), and informed consent was obtained from all participants. There are no ethical or legal restrictions preventing us from sharing de-identified data. We can provide the data upon request. For any data requests, please contact the Ethics Committee at Nantong University via email at ethics@ntu.edu.cn or phone at +86-513-85012345.

Comment #6:

Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

Response #6:

Thank you for your reminder. We have carefully reviewed our manuscript and removed all funding-related text from it. We understand that funding information should only be included in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form, and we have ensured that our manuscript complies with this requirement.

Comment #7:

Please include a copy of Table 5 which you refer to in your text on page 12.

Response #7:

Thank you for your reminder. We have included a copy of Table 5 in the manuscript, and it can be found in the table section at the end of the document.

Comment #8:

Please remove all personal information, ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set.

Response #8:

We have removed all personal information from the data set and ensured that the shared data are in full accordance with participant consent. We have re-uploaded a fully anonymized data set as requested.

Comment #9:

Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Response #9:

Thank you for your guidance. We have included captions for all Supporting Information files at the end of the manuscript (lines 512-514) and updated the in-text citations to match accordingly. We have followed the Supporting Information guidelines as detailed on the PLOS ONE website.

Comment #10:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Response #10:

We have reviewed the recommended previously published works as suggested by the reviewer. After careful evaluation, we have determined that these publications are relevant to our study and have included appropriate citations in the manuscript. If there are any specific preferences or additional requirements from the editor regarding these citations, please let us know.

Comment #11:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response #11:

We have thoroughly reviewed our reference list to ensure its completeness and accuracy. We have verified that all cited papers are relevant and up-to-date. If any retracted papers were cited, we have either provided a rationale within the manuscript text for their inclusion or removed them and replaced them with current, relevant references. Any changes to the reference list have been detailed in the rebuttal letter accompanying our revised manuscript. If necessary, we have indicated the retracted status of any articles in the References list and included a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Point-by-Point Responses to Reviewer 1

Comment #1:

The cross-sectional design limits causal inference; causal language should be avoided throughout the manuscript.

Response #1:

Thank you for your constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to avoid causal language, recognizing the limitations of our cross-sectional design(lines 479-489). Specifically, we have replaced causal terms with correlational expressions and have explicitly highlighted in the discussion section that our findings are limited to associations due to the study's cross-sectional nature.

Comment #2:

Generalizability beyond Chinese university students requires caution due to cultural/educational differences. Address this limitation explicitly.

Response #2:

Thank you for your insightful comments. In response to your suggestion, we have explicitly addressed the limitation regarding the generalizability of our findings beyond Chinese university students. We have incorporated this limitation into the discussion section of our manuscript, noting that caution should be exercised when applying our results to other populations due to potential cultural and educational differences(lines 479-489). We believe this addition strengthens the manuscript by providing a clearer understanding of the study's scope and applicability.

Comment #3:

The abstract misstates the research purpose. Revise to clarify ultimate goals and expected scholarly/practical contributions.

Response #3:

Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the abstract to accurately state the research purpose, emphasizing the study’s goals to examine the relationship between exercise adherence and life satisfaction, and to explore potential mediating factors(lines 33-39). The abstract now clearly outlines expected contributions to both scholarship and practical interventions.

Comment #4:

Strengthen discussion responses to core questions:(1) Do motor competence/health literacy significantly mediate exercise-life satisfaction in Chinese university students? (2) Which factors most strongly influence exercise-life satisfaction?

Response #4:

Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the discussion section to ensure that the responses to the core questions are clear and concise. The discussion section now clearly articulates the mediating roles of motor competence and health literacy, as well as the key factors influencing exercise-life satisfaction.

Comment #5:

Conclusions in the abstract must be distinct from findings.

Response #5:

Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the abstract to ensure that the conclusions are distinct from the findings. (lines 60-65) The findings now clearly state the empirical results of the study, while the conclusions highlight the broader implications and contributions of the research.

Point-by-Point Responses to Reviewer 2

Comment #1:

The methods section indicates that the health literacy scale demonstrated good internal consistency; however, the study does not provide detailed information regarding the validation of its psychometric properties, specifically its validity, within a Chinese population. The authors are encouraged to provide this information to enhance the credibility of the study.

Response #1:

Thank you for your feedback. In response to your suggestion, I have added detailed information on the validation of the psychometric properties of the health literacy scale, particularly its validity, within a Chinese population in the methods section, supported by relevant literature.(lines 177-184) The scale's construct validity was confirmed through significant correlations with established health behavior measures, and its convergent validity was further supported by additional analyses. These results, along with the supporting references, confirm the scale's validity and reliability for assessing health literacy in China.

Comment #2:

Methods section, while the study’s sample encompassed multiple provinces and universities, the uneven distribution of participants across gender and grade levels may compromise the generalizability of the findings. The authors are advised to discuss the potential impact of this sampling bias on the results and clarify whether stratified analysis was conducted to control for these discrepancies.

Response #2:

Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the Methods section to address the potential impact of the uneven distribution of participants across gender and grade levels on the generalizability of our findings. We conducted stratified analysis by gender and grade level to control for these discrepancies. In the Discussion section, we emphasize the limitations of our study, including the potential impact of this sampling bias on our results. (lines 479-489)

Comment #3:

Methods section, the assessment of motor skill competence relied on a single-item measure, which may not adequately capture the complexity of this construct. Furthermore, the reliability and validity of this measure were not demonstrated. Further elaboration on the rationale for using a single-item measure and a discussion of its limitations are recommended.

Response #3:

Thank you for your feedback. We recognize the limitations of using a single-item measure to assess motor-skill competence, which is a complex construct. The measure was chosen for practical reasons, but we acknowledge its potential for oversimplification and the lack of demonstrated reliability and validity. Future work will explore more comprehensive tools and validate our current measure. We appreciate your insights. (lines 479-489)

Comment #4:

Discussion section, the study employed a cross-sectional research design, which inherently limits the ability to establish causal relationships between variables. It is recommended that this limitation be explicitly acknowledged and discussed within the discussion section.

Response #4:

Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the Discussion section to explicitly acknowledge and discuss the limitations of our cross-sectional research design. We now clearly state that the cross-sectional nature of our study limits our ability to establish causal relationships between the variables examined. This limitation is thoroughly addressed, and we suggest potential avenues for future research to address these limitations. (lines 479-489)

Comment #5:

Discussion section� while the results are discussed at length, the discussion section lacks in-depth analysis. It is recommended that the authors expand upon this section.

Response #5:

Thank you for your valuable feedback. We have expanded the discussion section to provide a more in-depth analysis of the results. We have also added more detailed comparisons with existing studies and further explored the implications of our

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses to Editor and Reviewers.docx

pone.0335180.s002.docx (584KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Henri Tilga

7 Oct 2025

From Gym to Joy: The Serial Mediation of Motor Competence and Health Literacy in Chinese University Students' Exercise-Life Satisfaction Pathway

PONE-D-25-40062R1

Dear Dr. Geng,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Henri Tilga, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Although I still have some doubts about the sampling method of this study, this does not affect the external validity of the research conclusions. Overall, this paper is still very good.

Reviewer #2: Overall, this paper has a relatively large sample size and the statistical analysis is appropriate. I recommend it for publication.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Henri Tilga

PONE-D-25-40062R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Geng,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Henri Tilga

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Editor and Reviewers.docx

    pone.0335180.s002.docx (584KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly, because data from this study may contain sensitive patient information. Data are anonymized, however, due to relatively few severe cases, patients could be identified (The Ethics Committee at Nantong University). Therefore, data from this study will be made available for researchers who meet criteria for access to confidential data. Requests may be sent to: ethics@ntu.edu.cn.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES