Abstract
In recent years, topological descriptors have emerged as powerful tools for exploring the structural complexity and physico-chemical behavior of molecular networks. While extensive studies have been devoted to nanostructures and dendrimer systems, the mathematical modeling of tin oxide (SnO₂)–a material of high importance in sensing, catalysis, and nanotechnology-remains largely unexplored. Motivated by this gap, we develop and compute some important topological descriptors of the graph representation of SnO₂ and employ them to investigate its information-theoretic entropies. Furthermore, a quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) analysis is carried out using linear regression models to establish correlations between the computed indices and entropy values. The statistical parameters including correlation coefficients, F-values, and standard errors confirm the robustness and predictive power of the proposed models. Both mathematical derivations and graphical line-fit representations validate the strong compatibility of the regression framework with the data. The results highlight the intricate relationship between molecular structure, entropy, and predictive modeling, thus providing new insights into the characterization of complex oxide systems. This study not only advances the theoretical understanding of SnO₂ but also sets the foundation for further applications of topological descriptors and entropy measures in materials science and nanotechnology.
Keywords: Graph theory, Molecular modeling, Topological indices, Tin oxide, Entropy
Subject terms: Chemistry, Materials science, Mathematics and computing, Nanoscience and technology, Physics
Introduction
Chemical graph theory examines and comprehends chemical compounds using graph theory principles. In this context, atoms are called vertices and chemical bonds between atoms are called edges. The arrangement and connections between the atoms in a molecule can be shown using chemical graphs. By applying graph theory concepts like as degrees, order, and size, investigators may investigate the physical characteristics of chemical compounds and get more understanding into their reactivity, stability, and other chemical properties. A topological descriptor is a numerical value derived from graph theory that represents the structural features of a chemical compound. When a topological descriptor exhibits correlation with a molecular attribute, it can be expressed as either a topological index or a molecular index. The thermodynamic properties (such as boiling points, heat of combustion, enthalpy of formation, etc.) and a number of other properties showed good association with the structure. As a result, a topological index changes a chemical structure into a specific number that is useful for QSPR/QSAR research. Havare et al.1 illustrated the characteristics of novel drugs employed for cancer treatment using QSPR modeling and topological indices. Zhong et al.1 explored the quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPR) valency-based topological indices with COVID-19 pharmaceuticals. Generalized multiplicative first Zagreb index was computed by Hayat et al.2 and applied to graph QSPR modeling. For nanotubes, Zhang et al.3 Calculated the topological indices. Regression modeling was employed by Zaman et al.4 to analyze QSPR for Drugs Used in Blood Cancer Treatment. Several investigations have been initiated to investigate the efficacy of well-known indices, such as the Wiener, Zagreb, and Randic indices, in predicting the properties of molecules5–19. It has been demonstrated that these indices are highly beneficial when used in drug design, quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPR), and recognizing the intricate links between molecular structures and functioning20–34. Table 1 displays these topological indices.
Table 1.
Degree based topological descriptors.
The concept of entropy was first introduced by Shannon43. It determines how unpredictable the information content of a system is. It has been successfully utilized to investigate chemical networks and graphs. The graph entropy was introduced by Rashevsky44 using the classification of vertex orbits and was introduced in 1955. These days, graph entropy is used in numerous scientific disciplines, including chemistry and biology45. Manzoor et al.46 discovered the molecular graphs’ entropy metrics. The extremity of degree-based graph entropies was covered by Cao et al.47. Dehmer et al. investigated the background of graph entropy metrics48. Galavant et al.49 discussed about entropy based on the first degree. Liu J-B et al.50 explored Octahedron networks and determined topological indices based on degree. Asad et al.28 studied the structural complexity and irregularity of Kudriavite (CdBi2S4) using topological analysis. The predictive ability of entropy measures based on both multiplicative descriptor versions was examined by Paul D. et al.11. Ullah et al.51 investigated Network-Based Modeling of the Molecular Topology of Fuchsine Acid Dye with Respect to Certain Irregular Molecular Descriptors. Degree-based and reverse degree-based irregularity indices for the sodalite material network were modeled and characterized in three dimensions by Zaman et al.52. Ullah et al.53 explored the development of various bioconjugate networks and their structural modeling using irregularity topological indicators. Similarly, numerous other studies investigated the structural characteristics and structure–property relationships in various material systems by using different kinds of topological indices54–67.
Let
be an edge-weighted graph, with the symbols
. Here, the set of vertices and edges are denoted by
and
respectively, with
signifying the edge weight of the graph
. By adding the degrees of the edges
and
, one may calculate the edge weight of
. The graph entropy based on edge weight is defined in Eq. (1).
![]() |
1 |
By using topological indices (see Table 2) in Eq. (1) we get following entropies which are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Entropies of topological indices.
| Type of Entropy | Notation | Mathematical formula |
|---|---|---|
| Randic Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Atom bond connectivity Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Geometric arithmetic Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| First Zagreb Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Second Zagreb Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Hyper Zagreb Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Forgotten Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
| Augmented Zagreb Entropy | ![]() |
![]() |
After reviewing above mentioned literature, we found that computation of the graph of tin oxide (SnO2) for above mentioned indices and entropies are not discussed so far. Present research focuses on the QSPR analysis of the graph of tin oxide (SnO2) for above defined novel topological indices and the measures of entropy. Additionally, we use the linear regression model to correlate the indices and entropy. All of its results are displayed both graphically and mathematically using the appropriate line fit technique.
Results and discussions
In this section, we have computed different topological indices as well as their corresponding entropy measures by using the above-defined formulae.
Results for topological indices of tin oxide
We thoroughly examined the computation of various degree-based topological indices in this section to give a detailed review of the structural characteristics of the considered structures. These indices were carefully calculated in order to evaluate the topological properties of molecular graphs, which in effect showed their connection patterns and, potentially, their influence on chemical behavior. Furthermore, we integrated graphical representations to our numerical comparisons in order to further improve our findings. Visualizing the patterns and changes in these indices made it easier to figure out how structural variations between different molecules affected their individual degree-based topological indices.
The graph of tin oxide (
) is presented in Fig. 1. We partitioned the edges of the graph according to the degree of the end vertices. All vertices having degrees according to edges connected with the respective vertices are computed as 1, 2, 3 and 6. Here we have six different types of edges whose end vertices have degree
,
,
,
,
and
. Symbolically represented by
,
,
,
,
and
. Total number of edges computed of the type
,
,
,
,
and
are
,
,
,
,
and
, respectively. All these results are summarized in Table 3.
Fig. 1.
Structure of tin oxide: a Unit cell of
and b Crystal structure 
.
Table 3.
Edge partition of tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Theorem 1:
let
is the graph of tin oxide (
), then we have.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Proofs:
By using the edge partition given in Table 3 and formulae of the topological indices given in Table 1, we can prove the results as follows:
By using Randic index, if 
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
By using Randic index, if 
![]() |
![]() |
By using Randic index, if 
![]() |
![]() |
By using Randic index, if
.
![]() |
![]() |
By using Atom bond connectivity Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using Geometric Arithmetic Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using first Zagreb Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using second Zagreb Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using Hyper Zagreb Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using Forgotten Index
![]() |
![]() |
By using Augmented Zagreb Index
![]() |
![]() |
Computation of entropies
Let
be an edge-weighted graph, with the symbols
. Here, the set of vertices and edges are denoted by
and
respectively, with
signifying the edge weight of the graph
. By adding the degrees of the edges
and
, one may calculate the edge weight of
. The graph entropy based on edge weight is defined in Eq. (1).
![]() |
1 |
By using topological indices (see Table 1) in Eq. (1) we get the entropies shown in Table 2.
Let
is the graph of tin oxide then the entropies of the considered topological indices can be computed as follows:
By using the edge partition given in Table 3 and formulae of the entropies given in Table 2, we can easily obtain the following results.
By using Randic entropy, if 
![]() |
![]() |
By using Randic entropy, if 
![]() |
By using Randic entropy, if 
![]() |
![]() |
By using Randic entropy, if 
![]() |
![]() |
By using Atom bond connectivity entropy
![]() |
![]() |
By using Geometric arithmetic entropy
![]() |
![]() |
By using first Zagreb entropy
![]() |
By using second Zagreb entropy
![]() |
![]() |
By using Hyper Zagreb entropy
![]() |
![]() |
By using forgotten entropy
![]() |
![]() |
By using Augmented Zagreb entropy
![]() |
![]() |
Quantification and visualization of results
Comparison of results for topological indices
Tables 4, 5, 6 and Figs. 2, 3, 4 provide a comprehensive numerical and graphical comparison of several indices as the parameters p and q increased. The findings clearly reveal a positive increase by indicating that all indices increase when p and q values increase. But the rates of rise of the indices are different. Specifically, the graphical representations show that the
index is increasing more rapidly than the other indices. This indicates that
is more responsive to changes in p and q, which may be due to the underlying computing method. The significant increase in
indicates that it has the potential to be a very responsive measure, which might be particularly useful in applications requiring fast or highly accurate detection of changes.
Table 4.
Comparison of topological indices for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
96 | 34.8311 | 7.5748 | 2.4439 |
![]() |
408 | 132.8832 | 22.7298 | 9.7757 |
![]() |
896 | 281.2753 | 43.9708 | 19.9955 |
![]() |
1560 | 480.0074 | 71.2978 | 33.1033 |
![]() |
2400 | 729.0795 | 104.7108 | 49.0991 |
![]() |
3416 | 1028.4916 | 144.2098 | 67.9829 |
![]() |
4608 | 1378.2437 | 189.7948 | 89.7547 |
![]() |
5976 | 1778.3358 | 241.4658 | 144.4145 |
Table 5.
Comparison of topological indices for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
10.1698 | 12.5848 | 78 | 84 |
![]() |
34.636 | 44.8071 | 293 | 376 |
![]() |
70.0818 | 91.5 | 620 | 844 |
![]() |
116.5072 | 152.6635 | 1059 | 1488 |
![]() |
173.9122 | 228.2976 | 1610 | 2308 |
![]() |
242.2968 | 318.4023 | 2273 | 3304 |
![]() |
321.661 | 422.9776 | 3048 | 4476 |
![]() |
412.0048 | 542.0235 | 3935 | 5824 |
Table 6.
Comparison of topological indices for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
518 | 310 | 111.255831 |
![]() |
2033 | 1201 | 435.773324 |
![]() |
4420 | 2612 | 924.302479 |
![]() |
7679 | 4543 | 1576.843296 |
![]() |
11,810 | 6994 | 2393.395775 |
![]() |
16,813 | 9965 | 3373.959916 |
![]() |
22,688 | 13,456 | 4518.535719 |
![]() |
29,435 | 17,467 | 5827.123184 |
Fig. 2.
Graphical comparison of topological indices
,
,
and
.
Fig. 3.
Graphical comparison of topological indices
,
,
and
.
Fig. 4.
Graphical comparison of topological indices
,
and
.
Comparison of results for entropies
Tables 7, 8, 9 and Figs. 5, 6, 7 present a comprehensive numerical and graphical comparison of various entropies as the parameters p and q are increased. By demonstrating that all indices rise with higher values of p and q, the results clearly establish a positive correlation. However, the rates of rise of the indices are not the same. The
entropy is rising more quickly than the other entropy, according to the graphical representation in particular. It indicates that the reason
is more sensitive to changes in p and q could be related to its underlying computation method. The quick increases in
shows its potential as very responsive, which could be very useful in applications that need fast or extremely sensitive detection of changes.
Table 7.
Comparison of Entropies for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0.971489 | 1.098882 | 1.102512 | 1.12898 |
![]() |
1.572102 | 1.573868 | 1.655295 | 1.658704 |
![]() |
1.895605 | 1.864846 | 1.967131 | 1.963975 |
![]() |
2.124976 | 2.077084 | 2.190852 | 2.184209 |
![]() |
2.304281 | 2.245376 | 2.366713 | 2.357827 |
![]() |
2.451973 | 2.385279 | 2.512051 | 2.501582 |
![]() |
2.577731 | 2.505198 | 2.636086 | 2.624432 |
![]() |
2.68732 | 2.610234 | 2.744355 | 2.731778 |
Table 8.
Comparison of Entropies for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.121341 | 1.132689 | 1.233385 | 1.006224 |
![]() |
1.658459 | 1.682578 | 1.793131 | 1.580786 |
![]() |
1.960229 | 1.993275 | 2.114081 | 1.899601 |
![]() |
2.176994 | 2.216219 | 2.344261 | 2.12728 |
![]() |
2.34779 | 2.391497 | 2.524767 | 2.305782 |
![]() |
2.489286 | 2.53638 | 2.673574 | 2.453028 |
![]() |
2.610309 | 2.66005 | 2.800289 | 2.578513 |
![]() |
2.716155 | 2.76802 | 2.910687 | 2.687924 |
Table 9.
Comparison of Entropies for tin oxide (
).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.009749 | 1.0104 | 1.96226 |
![]() |
1.577614 | 1.573074 | 2.547035 |
![]() |
1.896372 | 1.891837 | 2.874375 |
![]() |
2.124539 | 2.120415 | 3.107477 |
![]() |
2.303537 | 2.299818 | 3.289637 |
![]() |
2.451212 | 2.447838 | 3.4395 |
![]() |
2.577056 | 2.573968 | 3.566944 |
![]() |
2.686767 | 2.683917 | 3.677872 |
Fig. 5.
Graphical comparison of entropy of
,
,
and
.
Fig. 6.
Graphical comparison of entropy of
,
,
and
.
Fig. 7.
Graphical comparison of entropy of
,
and
.
Relationship between topological indices and entropies
We use the following linear regression model to investigate the relationship between topological indices and their corresponding entropies.
![]() |
2 |
where ENT be the entropy measure, TI be the topological indices, a be the slope and b be the y intercept. We establish the relationship between the entropy measure and the degree-based topological indices using the aforementioned equation (Eq. 2). The correlation coefficient R is measure of degree that predict change in dependent variable with respect to independent variable. We determined each degree-based entropy for the different values of p and q for the tin oxide structure. In Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, the line fitting between degree-based indices and entropy measure is displayed. Incorporating a curve into data allows for the investigation of the relationship between many kinds of variables. We investigated the relationship between entropy formation and several indices using this technique. By adjusting several basic variables, the correlation between entropy and all indices was estimated using the linear curve fitting method. The linear regression approach, standard error estimation,
,
, and coefficient are the accuracy measurements used in this investigation. Table 10 presents the correlation coefficient values for each topological index against entropy.
Fig. 8.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 9.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 10.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 11.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 12.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 13.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 14.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 15.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 16.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 17.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Fig. 18.
Curve fitting between
and
.
Table10.
Statistical parameters for linear regression model.
| Topological indices | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0.0002409823 | 1.4900085298 | 0.8785363549 | 0.7718261269 | 0.2975199646 | 20.2957363111 | 0.0040818051 |
![]() |
0.0092371366 | 1.56410708647 | 0.8578263398 | 0.7358660293 | 0.28443680778 | 16.71574529 | 0.0064402116 |
![]() |
0.00077444537 | 1.5782860469 | 0.89082084269 | 0.79356177377 | 0.2655604187 | 23.06438458 | 0.0029929644 |
![]() |
0.00986245096 | 1.63332471835 | 0.8478619534 | 0.7188698921 | 0.31699255709 | 15.342431249 | 0.0078295209 |
![]() |
0.0033520492 | 1.556309914 | 0.89302707335 | 0.797497353 | 0.2611931569 | 23.629242436 | 0.00282001068 |
![]() |
0.00260961815 | 1.58110014738 | 0.89277497 | 0.79704714819 | 0.26829081507 | 23.563516583 | 0.00283943766 |
![]() |
0.00036513092 | 1.709767996 | 0.8881070935 | 0.7887342095 | 0.2811189012 | 22.400244017 | 0.00321492345 |
![]() |
0.0002426289 | 1.5126258796 | 0.8801023066 | 0.77458007009 | 0.29043457747 | 20.616989910 | 0.0039307759 |
![]() |
0.000048258787 | 1.5028938395 | 0.8829522314 | 0.77960464298 | 0.2866228736 | 21.223803991 | 0.0036652492 |
![]() |
0.000081253345 | 1.50081910045 | 0.8834793155 | 0.780535701007 | 0.2856140716 | 21.339298590 | 0.00361744678 |
![]() |
0.00025106391 | 2.4568021004 | 0.8858091836 | 0.7846579099 | 0.2898212493 | 21.8626440275 | 0.003410965 |
When we compared the value of
to the value of other topological indices, the values of
and
in Table 10 and Fig. 15 are maximum, while the value of SE is minimal. So, the best predictor is
. The following linear regression models are obtained for each index and entropy:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Table 11 shows the predicted entropy obtained from linear regression models (see Eq. 2), whereas Tables 4, 5, 6 show the entropy values obtained from Eq. 1.
Table 11.
Predicted Entropies.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.513143 | 1.588329 | 1.705929 | 1.865941 | 2.068366 | 2.313204 | 2.600455 | 2.930119 |
![]() |
1.586682 | 1.654407 | 21.56884 | 1.869887 | 2.017642 | 2.192074 | 2.393184 | 2.898084 |
![]() |
1.605261 | 1.681197 | 1.796118 | 1.950026 | 2.142918 | 2.374797 | 2.64566 | 2.95551 |
![]() |
1.708031 | 1.857496 | 2.066985 | 2.336496 | 2.66603 | 3.055587 | 3.505167 | 4.014769 |
![]() |
1.5904 | 1.672411 | 1.791228 | 1.946848 | 2.139272 | 2.368501 | 2.634533 | 2.93737 |
![]() |
1.613942 | 1.69803 | 1.81988 | 1.979494 | 2.17687 | 2.412009 | 2.68491 | 2.995575 |
![]() |
1.738248 | 1.816751 | 1.936149 | 2.096442 | 2.297629 | 2.539711 | 2.822687 | 3.146558 |
![]() |
1.533007 | 1.603854 | 1.717405 | 1.873658 | 2.072613 | 2.314272 | 2.598633 | 2.925697 |
![]() |
1.527892 | 1.601004 | 1.716198 | 1.873473 | 2.07283 | 2.314269 | 2.597789 | 2.923391 |
![]() |
1.526008 | 1.598404 | 1.713053 | 1.869953 | 2.069105 | 2.310509 | 2.594164 | 2.920071 |
![]() |
2.484734 | 2.566209 | 2.688861 | 2.852691 | 3.057697 | 3.303882 | 3.591243 | 3.919782 |
Conclusion
In this study, we developed and computed some degree based topological indices and their corresponding entropies for the molecular structure of tin oxide in order to provide more information on the structural characteristics of these systems. Our computations of entropy measures, which were based on these indices, showed the intricate relationship between structural complexity and information content. We used a linear regression model in an attempt to provide additional insight into the connections. The results demonstrated the feasibility of the model and emphasized its practical significance. The visualization of results demonstrated a strong fit between the regression curve and the scattered data points, validating our findings. These insights have significant implications for nanotechnology, where understanding the structure–property relationships at the molecular level is crucial for designing novel nanomaterials with tailored functionalities. In catalysis, the correlation between structural complexity and entropy can aid in predicting active sites and optimizing catalyst design for enhanced efficiency. Moreover, the topological indices and entropy measures developed in this study offer valuable tools for materials prediction, enabling the identification of promising molecular configurations with desirable stability and reactivity. The compatibility of model with the data demonstrates the validity of our analytical framework and its capacity to describe the complicated dynamics of complex systems. By promoting a deeper comprehension of the relationships between structural characteristics, information entropy, and regression modeling, this research provides a framework for further studies in complex system analysis.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the Natural Science Fund project of Universities in Anhui Province (No. 2024AH050616, 2022AH052889), and Anhui Xinhua University Scientific Research Project (2024zr009) for supporting this work.
Author contributions
The authors Jiang-Hua Tang, Muzher Saleem, Asad Ullah, and Nizam ud Din have equally contributed to this manuscript in all stages, from conceptualization to the write-up of the final draft. Shahid Zaman, Hijaz Ahmad, Parvez Ali, and Melaku Berhe Belay have contributed in methodology, investigation, validation and writing. All authors have approved the manuscript and given consent for publication.
Funding
This research was funded by Natural Science Fund project of Universities in Anhui Province (No. 2024AH050616, 2022AH052889), and Anhui Xinhua University Scientific Research Project (2024zr009).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within this article.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT 3.5 in order to improve readability and language of the manuscript. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jiang-Hua Tang and Muzher Saleem have contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Asad Ullah, Email: dr.asadullah@kiu.edu.pk.
Hijaz Ahmad, Email: hijazahmad@korea.ac.kr.
Melaku Berhe Belay, Email: melaku.berhe@aastu.edu.et.
References
- 1.Zhong, J.-F., Rauf, A., Naeem, M., Rahman, J. & Aslam, A. Quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) of valency based topological indices with Covid-19 drugs and application. Arab. J. Chem.14, 103240 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hayat, S. & Asmat, F. J. M. Sharp bounds on the generalized multiplicative first Zagreb index of graphs with application to QSPR modeling. Mathematics11, 2245 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang, X., Rauf, A., Ishtiaq, M., Siddiqui, M. K. & Muhammad, M. H. On degree based topological properties of two carbon nanotubes. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42, 866–884 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zaman, S., Yaqoob, H. S. A., Ullah, A. & Sheikh, M. QSPR analysis of some novel drugs used in blood cancer treatment via degree based topological indices and regression models. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.44, 2458–2474 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu, J.-B., Zhang, X. & Cao, J. Structural properties of extended pseudo-fractal scale-free network with higher network efficiency. J. Complex Netw.12, cnae023 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu, J.-B., Guan, L. & Cao, J. Property analysis and coherence dynamics for tree-symmetric networks with noise disturbance. J. Complex Netw.12, cnae029 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hayat, S., Alanazi, S. J. F. & Liu, J.-B. Two novel temperature-based topological indices with strong potential to predict physicochemical properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with applications to silicon carbide nanotubes. Phys. Scr.99, 55027 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu, J.-B., Zheng, Y.-Q. & Peng, X.-B. The statistical analysis for Sombor indices in a random polygonal chain networks. Discret. Appl. Math.338, 218–233 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arockiaraj, M. et al. QSPR analysis of distance-based structural indices for drug compounds in tuberculosis treatment. Heliyon10, e23981 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raza, Z., Arockiaraj, M., Maaran, A., Kavitha, S. R. J. & Balasubramanian, K. Topological entropy characterization, NMR and ESR spectral patterns of coronene-based transition metal organic frameworks. ACS Omega8, 13371–13383 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paul, D., Arockiaraj, M., Jacob, K. & Clement, J. Multiplicative versus scalar multiplicative degree based descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies and their comparative analysis in entropy measures. Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 323 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arockiaraj, M. et al. Novel molecular hybrid geometric-harmonic-Zagreb degree based descriptors and their efficacy in QSPR studies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. SAR QSAR Environ. Res.34, 569–589 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arockiaraj, M., Clement, J., Paul, D. & Balasubramanian, K. Relativistic distance-based topological descriptors of Linde type A zeolites and their doped structures with very heavy elements. Mol. Phys.119, e1798529 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hayat, S. & Wazzan, S. A computational approach to predictive modeling using connection-based topological descriptors: Applications in Coumarin anti-cancer drug properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci.26, 1827 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hayat, S., Khan, S., Khan, A. & Liu, J.-B. Valency-based molecular descriptors for measuring the π-electronic energy of lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42, 1113–1129 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hayat, S. Computing distance-based topological descriptors of complex chemical networks: New theoretical techniques. Chem. Phys. Lett.688, 51–58 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shanmukha, M. C., Gowtham, K. J., Usha, A. & Julietraja, K. Expected values of Sombor indices and their entropy measures for graphene. Mol. Phys.122, e2276905 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shanmukha, M. C. et al. Chemical applicability and computation of K-Banhatti indices for benzenoid hydrocarbons and triazine-based covalent organic frameworks. Sci. Rep.13, 17743 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shanmukha, M., Usha, A., Siddiqui, M., Shilpa, K. & Asare-Tuah, A. Novel degree-based topological descriptors of carbon nanotubes. J. Chem.2021, 3734185 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sharma, K., Bhat, V. K. & Liu, J.-B. Second leap hyper-Zagreb coindex of certain benzenoid structures and their polynomials. Comput. Theor. Chem.1223, 114088 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu, J.-B., Sharma, S. K., Bhat, V. K. & Raza, H. Multiset and mixed metric dimension for Starphene and zigzag-edge coronoid. Polycyclic Aromat. Compd.43, 190–204 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma, K., Bhat, V. K. & Sharma, S. K. On Degree-Based Topological Indices of Carbon Nanocones 45562–45573 (American Chemical Society, 2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mondal, S. & Das, K. C. Zagreb connection indices in structure property modelling. J. Appl. Math. Comput.69, 3005–3020 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Das, K. C., Mondal, S. & Raza, Z. On Zagreb connection indices. Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 1242 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mondal, S., Dey, A., De, N. & Pal, A. QSPR analysis of some novel neighbourhood degree-based topological descriptors. Complex Intell. Syst.7, 977–996 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang, Q., Zaman, S., Ullah, A., Ali, P. & Mahmoud, E. E. The sharp lower bound of tricyclic graphs with respect to the ISI index: applications in octane isomers and benzenoid hydrocarbons. Eur. Phys. J. E48, 10 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang, Q. et al. Mathematical study of silicate and oxide networks through Revan topological descriptors for exploring molecular complexity and connectivity. Sci. Rep.15, 8116 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ullah, A. et al. Topological analysis of the structural complexity and irregularity of Kudriavite (CdBi2S4). Chem. Pap.10.1007/s11696-025-04226-x (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tang, J.-H. et al. Chemical applicability and predictive potential of certain graphical indices for determining structure-property relationships in polycrystalline acid magenta (C20H17N3Na2O9S3). Sci. Rep.15, 13886 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sorgun, S. & Ullah, A. A python-based novel vertex–edge-weighted modeling framework for enhanced QSPR analysis of cardiovascular and diabetes drug molecules. Eur. Phys. J. E48, 36 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ling, X. et al. On analysis of the neighborhood irregularity descriptors for melamine-based TriCF networks: a novel topological insight into structural complexity. Chem. Pap.10.1007/s11696-025-04253-8 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kara, Y., Özkan, Y. S., Ullah, A., Hamed, Y. S. & Belay, M. B. QSPR modeling of some COVID-19 drugs using neighborhood eccentricity-based topological indices: A comparative analysis. PLoS ONE20, e0321359 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hakeem, A. et al. Topological modeling and QSPR based prediction of physicochemical properties of bioactive polyphenols. Sci. Rep.15, 27466 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hakeem, A., Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Hamed, Y. S. & Belay, M. B. Computational insights into flavonoid molecular structures and their QSPR modeling via degree based molecular descriptors. Chem. Pap.79, 745–760 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Randic, M. Characterization of molecular branching. J. Am. Chem. Soc.97, 6609–6615 (1975). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Estrada, E., Torres, L., Rodriguez, L. & Gutman, I. An atom-bond connectivity index: modelling the enthalpy of formation of alkanes. Sect. A Inorg. Phys. Theor. Anal.37(10), 849–855 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vukičević, D. & Furtula, B. Topological index based on the ratios of geometrical and arithmetical means of end-vertex degrees of edges. J. Math. Chem.46, 1369–1376 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gutman, I. & Das, K. C. The first Zagreb index 30 years after. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem.50, 83–92 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gutman, I. Degree-based topological indices. Croat. Chem. Acta86, 351–361 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Furtula, B. & Gutman, I. A forgotten topological index. J. Math. Chem.53, 1184–1190 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shirdel, G., Rezapour, H., Sayadi, A. The hyper-Zagreb index of graph operations (2013).
- 42.Wang, D., Huang, Y. & Liu, B. Bounds on augmented Zagreb index. Match-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem.68, 209 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J.27, 379–423 (1948). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rashevsky, N. Life, information theory, and topology. Bull. Math. Biophys.17, 229–235 (1955). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dehmer, M. & Grabner, M. The discrimination power of molecular identification numbers revisited. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem69, 785–794 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Manzoor, S., Siddiqui, M. K. & Ahmad, S. On entropy measures of molecular graphs using topological indices. Arab. J. Chem.13, 6285–6298 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cao, S., Dehmer, M. & Shi, Y. Extremality of degree-based graph entropies. Inf. Sci.278, 22–33 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dehmer, M. & Mowshowitz, A. J. I. S. A history of graph entropy measures. Inf. Sci.181, 57–78 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ghalavand, A., Eliasi, M. & Ashrafi, A. R. First degree-based entropy of graphs. J. Appl. Math. Comput.59, 37–46 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu, J.-B., Ali, H., Shafiq, M. K., Dustigeer, G. & Ali, P. On topological properties of planar octahedron networks. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.43, 755–771 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ullah, A., Shamsudin, Zaman, S., Hamraz, A. & Saeedi, G. Network-based modeling of the molecular topology of fuchsine acid dye with respect to some irregular molecular descriptors. J. Chem.2022, 8131276 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zaman, S., Salman, M., Ullah, A., Ahmad, S. & Abdelgader Abas, M. S. Three-dimensional structural modelling and characterization of sodalite material network concerning the irregularity topological indices. J. Math.2023, 5441426 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Hamraz, A. & Muzammal, M. On the construction of some bioconjugate networks and their structural modeling via irregularity topological indices. Eur. Phys. J. E46, 72 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hakeem, A. et al. Computational modeling of triangular γ-graphyne using advanced topological methods. Int. J. Mod Phys B39, 2550133 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zaman, S., Zafar, S., Ullah, A. & Azeem, M. Computational and molecular characterization of Chitosan derivatives by means of graph-theoretic parameters. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math.10, 100726 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ullah, A., Salman, S. & Zaman, S. Resistance distance and sharp bounds of two-mode electrical networks. Phys. Scr.99, 085241 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ullah, A., Jamal, M. & Zaman, S. Connection based novel AL topological descriptors and structural property of the zinc oxide metal organic frameworks. Phys. Scr.99, 055202 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ullah, A., Jabeen, S., Zaman, S., Hamraz, A. & Meherban, S. Predictive potential of K-Banhatti and Zagreb type molecular descriptors in structure–property relationship analysis of some novel drug molecules. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.71, 250–276 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ullah, A., Bano, Z. & Zaman, S. Computational aspects of two important biochemical networks with respect to some novel molecular descriptors. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.42, 791–805 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salman, M., Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Mahmoud, E. E. & Belay, M. B. 3D molecular structural modeling and characterization of indium phosphide via irregularity topological indices. BMC Chem.18, 101 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Meharban, S., Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Hamraz, A. & Razaq, A. Molecular structural modeling and physical characteristics of anti-breast cancer drugs via some novel topological descriptors and regression models. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol.7, 100134 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Li, X. et al. Computational Insights Into Zinc Silicate MOF Structures: Topological Modeling, Structural Characterization and Chemical Predictions 1–18 (Nature Publishing Group UK, 2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kosar, Z., Zaman, S., Ullah, A., Siddiqui, M. K. & Belay, M. B. Computation of molecular description of supramolecular Fuchsine model useful in medical data. Sci. Rep.14, 10933 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Hussain, A., Jabeen, A. & Belay, M. B. Derivation of mathematical closed form expressions for certain irregular topological indices of 2D nanotubes. Sci. Rep.13, 11187 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ullah, A., Zaman, S., Hamraz, A. & Muzammal, M. On the construction of some bioconjugate networks and their structural modeling via irregularity topological indices. Eur. Phys. J. E Soft Matter46, 72 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ullah, A., Zaman, S. & Hamraz, A. Zagreb connection topological descriptors and structural property of the triangular chain structures. Phys. Scr.98, 025009 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hakeem, A., Ullah, A. & Zaman, S. Computation of some important degree-based topological indices for γ- graphyne and zigzag graphyne nanoribbon. Mol. Phys.121, e2211403 (2023). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within this article.





















































































































































































































































