Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Nov 8:2025.10.13.681863. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2025.10.13.681863

tRNA Modification Landscapes in Streptococci: Shared Losses and Clade-Specific Adaptations

Ho-Ching Tiffany Tsui 1, Chi-Kong Chan 2,3, Yifeng Yuan 4, Roba Elias 4, Jingjing Sun 2,3, Virginie Marchand 5, Marshall Jaroch 4,&, Guangxin Sun 2,3, Irfan Manzoor 1, Ana Kutchuashvili 6, Yuri Motorin 5, Grazyna Leszczynska 7, Kinda Seaton 4, Kelly C Rice 4, Manal A Swairjo 6, Malcolm E Winkler 1, Peter C Dedon 2,3, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard 4,8,*
PMCID: PMC12632869  PMID: 41280037

Abstract

tRNA modifications are central to bacterial translational control. Here, we integrated genetics, mass spectrometry, epitranscriptomics, and comparative genomics to map the tRNA modification genes of the Gram-positive pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Both species show a marked loss of modifications dependent on Fe–S enzymes, consistent with a broader trend of Fe–S enzyme reduction in Streptococcus central metabolism. In addition, the D, m1A, m7G, t6A, and i6A modifications were mapped in S. pneumoniae tRNAs, and we confirmed that a unique DusB1 enzyme is responsible for the insertion of all the detectable D modifications. We uncovered differences in queuosine (Q) metabolism: while S. mutans synthesizes Q de novo, S. pneumoniae instead salvages preQ1 and accumulates the epoxy-Q precursor, a strategy shared with multiple other Streptococci as revealed by analysis of Q pathways in 1,599 sequenced streptococcal genomes. Comparative essentiality profiling of modification genes revealed notable differences, including the essentiality of the N -threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t A) synthesis enzyme TsaE in S. pneumoniae but not in S. mutans, which was confirmed by genetic studies. We found that suppressor mutations in asnS encoding asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS) restored viability to ΔtsaE mutants, albeit with reduced growth. Our finding highlights the functional importance of modifications in the recognition of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Keywords: tRNA modification, Queuosine, t6A, Dihydrouridine, TsaE, pseudogene

Introduction

Streptococci are a diverse group of Gram-positive bacteria that are common members of the human microbiota, capable of colonizing the skin as well as mucosal membranes of the oral cavity, upper respiratory tract, intestines, and vaginal tract [1]. Clinically important species include Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A), responsible for pharyngitis, rheumatic fever, and necrotizing fasciitis[2]; Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B), a cause of neonatal infections [3]; Streptococcus mutans, a keystone pathogen in the development of dental caries, as well as infective endocarditis in at-risk patient groups [4]; and Streptococcus pneumoniae, a leading cause of otitis, pneumonia and meningitis [5]. These bacteria exhibit a wide range of virulence factors and adaptation mechanisms, making them important subjects of study in both basic microbiology and infectious disease research.

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the essential decoding molecules in the translation process, and they undergo extensive post-transcriptional modification. These modifications fine-tune translation efficiency, fidelity, and tRNA stability [6,7]. In pathogenic bacteria, tRNA modifications can modulate stress responses [8,9], antibiotic resistance [9,10], metabolic fluxes [11] and the accurate synthesis of infection-related proteins [12,13] and are hence important in microbial pathogenesis and virulence in many different bacteria (see [1416] for recent reviews). In addition, a few bacterial tRNA modification enzymes are essential and have no ortholog in humans and are thus being explored as antibacterial targets [17,18].

That said, our understanding of the role of tRNA modifications in pathogens remains limited, as comprehensive mapping of specific tRNA modifications and their corresponding biosynthetic enzymes have been completed in only a few organisms, including the model gram-negative Escherichia coli K12 [17]. For decades, the intracellular pathogen Mycoplasma capricolum was the only Gram-positive organism with combined experimental and bioinformatic evidence linking tRNA modifications with their genes [17,19]. As discussed previously [17], no single method, analytical or computational, can accurately predict the full set of tRNA modification enzymes in a given organism. However, the combination of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), tRNA sequencing, and bioinformatics methods greatly increases the accuracy of the predictions [17]. This type of integrative approach has enabled the mapping of modifications and their genes in three additional gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis [20], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [21] and Streptomyces albidoflavus [22]. The initial analysis of tRNA modification genes in B. subtilis revealed open questions [20], including the specificities of dihydrouridine synthase enzymes and the identity of the enzymes involved in cmnm5(s2)U deacetylation and nm5(s2)U methylation that have now both been resolved [23,24](Fig. 1, Supplemental Data 1A).

Figure 1. The comparison of tRNA modifications and corresponding enzymes among B. subtilis, S. mutans, and S. pneumoniae.

Figure 1.

Modified positions are colored blue when the modification and enzymes are conserved and orthologous in three strains; green when they differ between Bacillus and Streptococcus; and red when they differ between S. mutans and S. pneumoniae. Evidence code: M, modification reported; G, gene coding modifying protein or an ortholog of an existing modifying protein; E, experiments that validated modifying gene(s) of the species via in vivo gene knockout or in vitro expression; O, ortholog that was validated experimentally in a different species. References for all proteins listed are given in Supplemental data S1D.

Dihydrouridine (D) is a widespread modification that is important for tRNA structure and flexibility [25]. Three subfamilies of dihydrouridine synthases with different specificities modify E. coli tRNAs. DusA (K05539) modifies positions 20 and 20a, DusB (K05540) position 17, and DusC (K05541) position 16. Only two DusB paralogs are present in B. subtilis, DusB1 (BSU00810) and DusB2 (BSU08030), and it was recently shown that in this model organism, DusB1 exhibits multisite enzyme activity, enabling D formation at positions 17, 20, 20a, and 47, while DusB2 specifically catalyzes U to D conversion at positions 20 and 20a [23]. Many pathogenic Bacillota (formerly Firmicutes) have lost one of the two DusB enzymes [26]. Many Staphylococcus aureus strains encode a full-length DusB2 and a truncated version DusB2-C, but only the full-length one is active [27], while M. capricolum and most Streptococci only encode a DusB1 [23,26]. Heterologous expression studies with the Mycoplasma DusB1 (MCAP_0837) enzyme showed that it modifies positions 17, 20, and 20a, but this is yet to be validated genetically in an endogenous host [26].

Mnm5s2U is a common wobble base (position 34) modification found in both Gram+ and Gram bacteria that is important for the decoding of NNA/NNG codons, particularly in split codon boxes [7]. The MnmEG complex catalyzes the first step of this complex pathway both in B. subtilis and E. coli [28,29] producing the cmnm5s2U or nm5s2U precursors. Several studies have linked the absence of MnmG (or MnmE) with pleiotropic phenotypes in many bacteria [30] including virulence defects in different Streptococci [3134]. The subsequent stages of the pathway are catalyzed by non-orthologous enzymes in the two major model organisms. The E. coli FAD-dependent cmnm5(s2)U deacetylase [MnmC1/MnmC(o), a domain of the bifunctional MnmC (K15461) protein] is replaced in B. subtilis by the radical SAM enzyme MnmL (K07139)[24]. Two different families of methylases finalize the synthesis of mnm5U by methylating nm5U: the E. coli MnmC2/MnmD/MnmC(m) type and the B. subtilis MnmM type [24,35]. The functional roles of the S. mutans MnmL and MnmM orthologs have also been confirmed by genetic studies [24]. The corresponding genes do accumulate inactivating mutations in many S. pneumoniae strains that lack mnm5s2U and accumulate the nm5s2U precursor [24]. In S. mutans, the only other tRNA modification genes that have been characterized are involved in the synthesis of two other complex modifications of the tRNA Anticodon-Stem-loop (ASL): the wobble base modification Queuosine (Q)[36] at position 34 and the universal N6 adenosine modification -threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A) at position 37 [37].

Q is a deazapurine derivative synthesized de novo from GTP in many bacteria in seven catalytic steps [38]. Q precursors such as preQ0, preQ1, or the queuine base (q) can be salvaged in some bacteria [38] using a wide variety of transporters, including the QPTR and QueT/QtrT subgroups of the Energy-coupling factor (ECF) transporter families [38,39]. Pathogenic bacteria that colonize the human host can use salvaged q either directly by mutating the substrate specificity of the bacterial TGT enzyme from preQ1 to q [40], or indirectly by converting salvaged q to preQ1, a reaction catalyzed by a radical-SAM enzyme QueL [40]. Queuine can be generated by cleaving Q with hydrolases such as QueK which has also been characterized in a human pathogen [40]. S. mutans can synthesize Q de novo using the same pathway as E. coli, and all Q synthesis genes have been experimentally validated, including the signature enzyme TGT that inserts the preQ1 precursor into target tRNAs [36]. In addition, we confirmed S. mutans can salvage preQ0 and preQ1 using a QueT-dependent ECF transporter [36]. No obvious phenotype was linked to Q absence, but it was found that Q levels in S. mutans tRNAs were greatly influenced by media conditions [36]. It remains to be determined whether S. mutans or any other Streptococci can recycle or salvage q or Q.

t6A is a universal modification and its synthesis requires two steps, catalyzed in bacteria by TsaC (or TsaC2) and the TsaBDE complex, respectively [41,42]. The essentiality of the t6A synthesis genes varies among organisms. They are essential in E. coli and S. aureus but not in Deinococcus radiodurans, B. subtilis, or S. mutans [43]. In some organisms, t6A is a determinant for the charging of tRNAIle by Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase [41,43] and could also be a determinant for lysidine synthase (TilS), which is one of the rare essential tRNA modification enzymes, as it is required for cognate tRNAs to decode AUA (Ile) codons [43]. However, it seems many organisms can circumvent these t6A requirements by mechanisms that have not been fully elucidated.

In this work, we combined analytical, genomic, genetic, and bioinformatic approaches to predict the complete sets of tRNA modification enzymes in two model Streptococci (S. mutans and S. pneumoniae). Our analysis revealed shared differences with the Gram-positive model B. subtilis, notably a consistent loss of iron–sulfur cluster–dependent modifications. We also found that the Q pathway is markedly reduced in S. pneumoniae compared to S. mutans, a pattern representative of most sequenced Streptococci, as shown by our comparative analysis of ~1,600 genomes. Finally, we demonstrate that, unlike in S. mutans, where t6A is dispensable, this conserved anticodon–stem–loop modification is essential in S. pneumoniae, although suppressor mutations arise at high frequency, pointing to previously unrecognized roles of t6A in translation.

Methods

Databases resources

Different databases and repositories from the NCBI resources (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) [44] including Pubmed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and RefSeq (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/) [45] and COG (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/cog/) [46], from the EBI resources (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/) [47] including Uniprot (https://www.uniprot.org/) [48] and InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) [49], from the KEGG resources (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) [50] including the KO (KEGG ORTHOLOGY) (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/ko.html) database, the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/) [51] and the BV-BRC (https://www.bv-brc.org/) [52] resources were routinely used. Subtiwiki (https://subtiwiki.uni-goettingen.de/v5/welcome) was used as the source of rRNA modification genes in Gram-positive [53].

Q synthesis and salvage gene/protein analyses

Genome DNA sequences and protein sequences from 1,599 Streptococcus strains were retrieved from the NCBI database in July 2025, applying filters for annotation (‘RefSeq’) and assembly status (‘complete’) (Supplemental data 1F and Fig. S1 step 4). Q proteins and Q genes were searched in them using BLASTp and tBLASTn [54] with a P-value cutoff of 1E-10 and an identity cutoff of 20% (Fig. S1 step 5). Query sequences were the Queuosine synthesis and salvage proteins from B. subtilis (Supplemental Data 1A and 1E). Pseudogenes were called when matches were found by tBLASTn but not by BLASTp, indicative of internal stops or frameshifts. A hundred and twenty conserved marker proteins were identified and aligned using GTDBtk (v2.3.2) [55] with Pseudolactococcus and Lactococcus as the outgroup. A maximum likelihood tree of the concatenated marker proteins was generated using IQ-TREE2 (v2.2.2.7) [56], employing the LG+G substitution model and 1,000 fast bootstrap replicates (Fig. S1 step 6). The tree was visualized with the mapping of Q protein patterns using iTOL (v7.2.1) [57]. Branches of the same species harboring the same Q proteins were collapsed and represented by triangles, the size of which correlates with the number of species. Species names were updated when their RefSeq classification disagree with their GTDB classification or their position in the tree (Fig. S1 step 7, Supplemental Data 1E). Species represented by fewer than three strains or rare Q gene patterns were hidden. [

Multiple sequence alignment of Q proteins (input sequences in Supplemental Data 1F) was performed using MAFFT (v7.520) [58] with setting “--maxiterate 1000 --localpair”. Sequence logos were generated with the aligned sequences using Weblogo [59]. Alignments of genome sequences was performed using BLASTn (v2.15).

Sequence similarity network analyses

The sequence similarity network (SSN) of inosine/uridine-preferring nucleoside hydrolase (IPR023186) family was generated using EFI-EST (EFI Enzyme Similarity Tool, efi.igb.illinois.edu/efi-est)[60](Fig. S1 step 8). 36,956 sequences in the family were retrieved from UniProt and subjected to EFI-EST using the family option. Each node in the network represents one or multiple sequences that share no less than 90% identity. The initial SSN was generated with an Alignment Score Threshold (AST) set such that each connection (edge) represented a sequence identity above 40%. The nodes from Streptococcus were colored and visualized using Cytoscape 3.10.1[61]. More SSNs were created by gradually increasing the alignment score cutoff in small increments (usually by 5 AST). This process was repeated until paralogs in the IPR023186 family were separated into different clusters (AST=100). In the final view of the SSN, the shapes of nodes are based on the kingdom of species of the representative sequence of each node. The nodes of Streptococcus are filled in yellow. The nodes that have been annotated experimentally as not being QueK are filled in black. The nodes are filled in blue and skyblue when their encoding gene is next to queT or other transporter gene, respectively. The borders of nodes are highlighted in red when the representative sequences of each node are from genomes that lack queDECF genes. For better visualization, clusters with less than 30 nodes are hidden. The resulting SSN was then subjected to EFI-EST and EFI-GNT for gene neighborhood analysis with default settings. The retrieved genome neighborhood was visualized using Gene Graphics (https://genegraphics.net/)[62]. Identifiers for sequences used in the SSN and in the genome neighborhood analyses are available in Supplemental Data S1G and S1H.

Codon usage analyses

The genome distances between each of the 234 S. pneumoniae genomes and all other Streptococci present in our genome set were calculated using MASH v2.3[63] (Fig. S1 step 9). 26 genome pairs that each share at least 92% genome identity (distance < 0.08) between a S. pneumoniae strain and a member from another Streptoccocal clade were chosen (Supplemental Data S1I). The coding DNA sequences (CDSs) of the selected genome pairs were retrieved from the NCBI database. After removing pseudogenes, the number of each of the 61 sense codons was calculated per CDS (excluding start codons) (Fig. S1 step 10). Then, the genome-wide codon usage for every amino acid was compared using a paired two-tailed t-test (Supplemental Data S1I).

Structural analysis

Experimental structures of AsnRS, AspRS and LysRS were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/), and the AlphaFold models for SpAsnRS and SmAsnRS were obtained from UniProt (IDs Q8CWQ4 and Q8DTM2, respectively). Structures were aligned and analyzed in Pymol (https://www.pymol.org/) [64]. The structure-based multi-sequence alignment was generated using the PROMALS3D online tool (http://prodata.swmed.edu/promals3d/)[65] and printed in ESPript [66].

Strains and culture conditions

All bacterial strains used in this work are listed in Table S1. Strains of S. mutans were routinely cultured statically at 37°C in 5% CO2 in BHI medium (BD Biosciences) with 10 μg/mL erythromycin (Sigma) or 1 mg/mL kanamycin (Sigma) when appropriate. S. pneumoniae derivatives were derived from unencapsulated strains IU1824 (D39 Δcps rpsL1) and IU1945 (D39 Δcps), which were derived from the encapsulated serotype-2 D39W progenitor strain IU1690 [67,68]. Strains containing antibiotic markers were constructed by transformation of CSP1-induced competent pneumococcal cells with linear DNA amplicons synthesized by overlapping fusion PCR [69]. Strains containing markerless alleles in native chromosomal loci were constructed using allele replacement via the Pc-[kan-rpsL+] (Janus cassette)[70]. Primers and DNA templates used to synthesize different amplicons are listed in Table S2. S. pneumoniae were grown on plates containing trypticase soy agar II (modified; Becton-Dickinson), and 5% (vol/vol) defibrinated sheep blood (TSAII-BA). Plates were incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. TSAII-BA plates for selections contained antibiotics at concentrations described previously [69]. Bacteria were cultured statically in Becton-Dickinson brain heart infusion (BHI) broth at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, and growth was monitored by OD620 as described before [69]. Mutant constructs were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing of chromosomal regions corresponding to the amplicon region used for transformation. Ectopic expression of various genes was achieved with a PZn zinc-inducible promoter in the ectopic bgaA site. 1/10 concentration of Mn2+ was added with Zn2+ to prevent zinc toxicity [69]. 0.1 to 0.2 mM (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) was added to TSAII-BA plates or BHI broth for inducing conditions. Mn2+ was added with Zn2+ to prevent zinc toxicity [69,71]. Ectopic expression of asnS [D121A] was achieved with a constitutive promoter PftsA at the bgaA site [72].

In all experiments, S. pneumoniae cells were inoculated from frozen glycerol stocks into BHI broth, serially diluted, and incubated 12–15 h statically at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For culturing merodiploid strains IU18963 (ΔtsaE//PZn-tsaE+) that require Zn2+ for expressing tsaE from a Zn-dependent promoter (PZn), 0.1 mM (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) was added to BHI broth in the overnight cultures. The next day, cultures at OD620 ≈0.1–0.4 were diluted to OD620 ≈0.003 in BHI broth with no additional (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) or the amounts of (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) indicated for each experiment. Doubling time determination was performed by first examining the growth curves on a log scale to determine the time points when growth was in the exponential phase. Doubling times were determined with the exponential growth equation using only data points that exhibit exponential growth using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts USA, www.graphpad.com. Maximal growth yields were determined by the highest OD620 values obtained within 9 h of growth. Cultures were sampled for phase microscopy at early to mid-exponential phase.

S. pneumoniae Tn-seq transposon library generation and insertion sequencing

Tn-seq was carried out according to protocols described in [73] using a transposon insertion library generated for WT D39 Δcps rpsL1 (IU1824) and WT D39 cps+ rpsL1 (IU1781) cultured with BHI media. In brief, transposon library starter cultures were thawed, and were diluted to OD620 ≈ 0.005 in 5 ml of BHI and were grown at 37°C with 5% CO2 to OD620 ≈ 0.4. 5 ml of culture at OD620 ≈ 0.4 were used to extract genomic DNA. MmeI digested DNA were ligated to adaptors and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 at the Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University Bloomington. Data were mapped and analyzed, and Tn insertion data were visualized graphically using the Artemis genome browser (version 10.2) [74].

S. pneumoniae transformation assays

Transformations were performed as previously described [72,75]. ΔtsaE::Pc-erm, ΔtsaE Pc-kan-rpsL amplicons, and positive control ΔbgaA::Pc-erm amplicon were synthesized by PCR using the primers and templates listed in Table S2 and contain ≈1 kb of flanking chromosomal DNA. A fusion ΔtsaE markerless amplicon or an amplicon from strain IU18963 were used for transformation of IU18886. All transformation experiments were performed using no added DNA as the negative control. The sizes of colonies indicated in Table 1 were relative to colonies transformed with the WT strain with a control ΔbgaA amplicon. For transformations in 0.1 mM or 0.2 mM (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+), ZnCl2 and MnSO4 stock solutions were added to transformation mixes and soft agar for plating and spread onto blood plates containing the respective (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) concentrations to induce gene expression under control of the PZn zinc-inducible promoter in the ectopic bgaA site.

Table 1.

Transformation of ΔtsaE amplicons into different backgrounds confirms tsaE essentiality in S. pneumoniae D39 and suppression by asnS[D121A] mutationa

Recipient strain and condition Recipient genotype Amplicon Number of colonies at 22 h after transformation with deletion ampliconsb
IU1824 - Zn WT ΔtsaE::Pcerm 0 colonyc,d,e
IU1824 − Zn ΔtsaE::Pc-kan-rpsL 0 colonyc,d,f
IU1824 − Zn ΔbgaA::Pcerm (control) >500 healthy colonies
IU18816 − Zn tsaE+ // ΔbgaA::PZn-tsaE ΔtsaE::Pcerm >500 small coloniesg
IU18816 + 0.2 mM Zn >500 healthy colonies
IU18886 − Zn ΔtsaE::Pc-kan-rpsL//ΔbgaA::PZn-tsaE ΔtsaE markerless 0 colony
IU 18886 + 0.1 mM Zn >500 healthy colonies
IU19598 asnS+ ΔbgaA::PftsA-asnS[D121A] ΔtsaE::Pcerm >500 small coloniesg
IU19599 asnS+ ΔbgaA::PftsA-asnS+ ΔtsaE::Pcerm Faint colonies in agar
a

Recipient strains in D39 Δcps rpsL1 (IU1824) background and amplicons were obtained as described in Table S1.

b

Transformations and visualization of colonies normalized to 1 mL of transformation mixture were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Colony appearance is compared to colonies obtained with WT strain transformed with a positive control amplicon, ΔbgaA::Pcerm. Numbers of colonies listed are normalized to 1 mL of transformation mix. Transformants were confirmed by PCR reactions. Each transformation experiment was performed 2 or more times independently with similar results.

c

Occasional suppressor mutants were present.

d

Colonies remained very small, but uniform-sized upon re-streaking on antibiotic selection plates.

e

The suppressor strain was stored as IU18824 and whole genome sequenced.

f

The suppressor strain was stored as IU18826 and whole genome sequenced.

g

Small colonies are obtained with transformation of the merodiploid strains (IU18816 and IU18886) under non-inducing (no Zn) conditions, probably because of the slight expression of tsaE from the Pzn promoter.

Whole-genome DNA sequencing

Whole-genome sequencing was employed to identify suppressor mutations and verify the genomes of the constructed mutants. Strains IU18824, IU18826, E797, and K797 (Table S2) containing suppressor mutations that allowed growth of a ΔtsaE mutant were isolated as described in Results. Genomic DNA preparation, DNA library construction, Illumina MiSeq DNA sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses were performed as described previously [75]. Genomic DNA from the S. mutans tsaE deletion strain (JB409) and its isogenic WT strains (S. mutans UA159, Wen laboratory Isolate) were extracted using DNeasy Blood and tissue kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s instructions. and was sequenced at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS) Illumina sequencing libraries were prepared using the tagmentation-based and PCR-based Illumina DNA Prep kit and custom IDT 10bp unique dual indices (UDI) with a target insert size of 280 bp. No additional DNA fragmentation or size selection steps were performed. Illumina sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq X Plus sequencer in one or more multiplexed shared-flow-cell runs, producing 2×151bp paired-end reads. Demultiplexing, quality control and adapter trimming were performed with bcl-convert1 (v4.2.4), a proprietary Illumina software for the conversion of bcl files to basecalls. Illumina generated 2×151bp paired end read data was used as the input for variant calling against the reference (GenBank id: AE014133) Variant calling was carried out using BreSeq1 under default settings [76].

tRNA and rRNA extraction

Bulk tRNA samples from S. mutans cells were prepared in previous studies [24,36]. tRNA samples from S. pneumoniae derivatives were prepared as described in detail previously (see MW methods in [24]). Overnight cultures (12–15 h) diluted to an initial OD620nm 0.005 and allowed to grow until an OD620nm of ≈ 0.2. For cultures treated with PreQ0 (Millipore Sigma, AMBH2D6F0DFD) or PreQ1 (Millipore Sigma, product # SML0807), stock solution of 100 μM PreQ0 or PreQ1 in DMSO was added to BHI media to a final concentration of 100 nM at initial growth. The same volume of DMSO was added to the control samples. The purified tRNA samples were stored at −80°C until further analysis.

For rRNA samples, the WT Streptococcus mutans UA159 strain was cultured in BHI broth at 37°C in 5% CO2 until mid-log phase (OD600= 0.6–0.8). Cells were harvested and lysed as described by Chia et al. [77], followed by TRIzol extraction (Invitrogen) and purification using the NucleoBond RNA/DNA kit (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting preparation was treated with DNase I (NEB) for 10 minutes at 37 °C, and the RNA was then cleaned up using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA concentration and purity were assessed by NanoDrop spectrophotometry, and integrity was verified by running a 1 % agarose; The RNA electropherogram and RNA Integrity Number (RIN) were obtained using an Agilent 4200 TapeStation (ICBR, UF).

Phase microscopy and cell measurements

Cultures were sampled for phase microscopy at OD620 ≈0.1–0.2 for IU1824 and IU18963, and OD620≈0.03–0.05 for IU18824. 500 μL of culture were centrifuged at 20,000g at room temperature for 3 min. 450 μL of supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in the remaining 50 μL media. 1.5 μL of cells were placed on a slide and covered with a coverslip and observed with phase contrast microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse E400 microscope.

Cell lengths and widths of strains growing in BHI broth were measured from phase-contrast images by using Nikon NIS-Element BR software as described before [69]. Only ovoid-shape predivisional cells were measured. Cells (88 or more) from 2 independent experiments were measured and plotted with scatter plot. P values were obtained by one-way ANOVA analysis by using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test in GraphPad Prism program.

RNA hydrolysis for LC-MS/MS analysis

Purified tRNA and rRNA (3 μg) were hydrolyzed to nucleosides as previously described [78] in a 50-μL enzyme cocktail containing 8 U benzonase (Sigma), 5 U calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Sigma), 0.15 U snake venom phosphodiesterase I (Sigma), 5 ng coformycin NCI), 0.1 mM deferoxamine (Sigma), 0.1 mM butylated hydroxytoluene (Sigma), 50 nM internal standard [15N]5-deoxyadenosine (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories), 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Sigma), and 5 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0 (Invitrogen). Enzyme control reactions were prepared identically but without the addition of RNAs. The reaction mixtures were gently tapped, briefly spun down, and incubated at 37 °C for 6 h. After hydrolysis, the samples were centrifuged at 3,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min and analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

LC-MS/MS analysis of modified ribonucleosides

The LC-MS/MS analysis of tRNAs extracted from S. mutans was described previously [24,36]. For S. pneumoniae, a first batch was analyzed as described in [24]. All other LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity II UHPLC system equipped with an inline diode array detector (DAD) and coupled to an Agilent 6495c triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS). For each run, 180 ng of hydrolyzed RNA was injected onto a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 μm) equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 VanGuard Pre-column (5 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 μm) and an ACQUITY Column In-line Filter (0.2 μm). To facilitate the detection of low abundance modified ribonucleosides, a second injection of 600 ng of hydrolyzed RNA was performed for each sample. The column was maintained at 30 °C and operated at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min with mobile phase solvents consisting of Buffer A (0.02% formic acid in water) and Buffer B (0.02% formic acid in 70% aqueous acetonitrile). The gradient of Buffer B was programmed as follows: 0–5 min, 0–1%; 5–7 min, 1–3%; 7–9 min, 3–7%; 9–10 min, 7–10%; 10–12 min, 10–12%; 12–13 min, 12–15%; 13–15 min, 15–20%; 15–16 min, 20–75%; 16–17 min, 75–100%; 17–20 min, held at 100%, 20–21 min, 100–0%; and 21–30 min, re-equilibrated at 0%. The DAD wavelength was set to 260 nm to acquire signals of canonical ribonucleosides. The JetSream ESI source operated in positive-ion mode with the following optimized parameters: drying gas temperature, 200 °C; gas flow, 11 L/min; nebulizer, 20 psi; sheath gas temperature, 300 °C; sheath gas flow, 12 L/min; capillary voltage, 3000 V; and nozzle voltage, 0 V. MS/MS analysis leveraged a dynamic multiple reaction monitoring (dMRM) mode with retention time windows set as ± 2 min and collision energies (CEs) optimized for maximal sensitivity. Retention time of modified ribonucleosides were confirmed with synthetic standards (Supplemental Data 2A) and served as a primary criterion for peak identification. Raw peak areas for each modified ribonucleoside were extracted using Agilent QQQ Quantitative Analysis version 10.2 and normalized to the sum of the peak areas for the four canonical ribonucleosides recorded by the DAD. Raw LC-MS/MS data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069173.

Besides the modified ribonucleosides for which we have synthetic standards, we also monitored a set of putative modifications that lack available synthetic standards in our inventory but have been previously reported in other prokaryotes. Information regarding precursor and product ions for these modifications was obtained from Modomics [79], precedent studies, and the literature, and incorporated into the dMRM method. Identities for these putative modifications were validated using a two-step approach. First, extracted ion chromatograms from the unit-resolution LC-MS/MS analysis of hydrolyzed tRNAs were compared with those from enzyme control reactions; only peaks observed exclusively in the hydrolyzed tRNAs were considered for further analysis. These peaks were subsequently subjected to high-resolution LC-MS analysis using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system coupled to an Orbitrap Q Exactive mass spectrometer equipped with an Ion Max source and a heated ESI (HESI II) sprayer. For each injection, 2 μg of hydrolyzed tRNAs was loaded onto the same analytical column, eluted with the same mobile phase solvents, and subjected to the same LC gradient and column oven temperature as described above. The source and MS parameters are as follows: spray voltage, +4.2 kV; capillary temperature, 320 °C; sheath gas, 50 arbitrary unit (au); auxiliary gas, 15 au; spare gas, 3 au; max spray current, 100 μA; probe heater temperature, 400 °C; and S-Lens RF level, 70 au. Initially, the hydrolyzed tRNAs were analyzed using a targeted selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode with a mass inclusion list of putative modifications identified from the LC-MS/MS analysis. The Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target was set at 20,000, with a maximum injection time of 150 ms. SIM mass spectra were acquired at a resolution of 35,000 full width at half maximum (FWHM) at m/z 200 with an isolation window of 4.0 Da. Peaks with a mass error < 5 ppm were subjected to targeted MS/MS fragmentation. To this end, the AGC target was increased to 500,000, with a maximum injection time of 100 ms. MS/MS spectra were acquired were acquired over an m/z range of 50 – 450 at a resolution of 17,500 FWHM at m/z 200 with an isolation window of 2.0 Da and CEs between 10 and 20 eV. The acquired spectra were compared to those reported in literature or to fragmentation patterns predicted using the Mass Fragmentation Tool in ChemDraw version 22.0.

Analysis of tRNA modifications by AlkAnilineSeq

tRNA samples (~200 ng) from S. mutans and S. pneumoniae were subjected to random fragmentation by alkaline hydrolysis in 50 mM sodium-bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.2 and 96°C for 5 min [80]. The reaction was stopped by ethanol precipitation using 3M Na-OAc, pH 5.2 and glycoblue. After centrifugation, the RNA pellet was washed with 80% ethanol and resuspended in nuclease-free water. RNA fragments were de-phosphorylated by Antarctic phosphatase (NEB ref M0289L, USA) at 37°C for 1h and precipitated using 3M Na-OAc, pH 5.2 and glycoblue as previously described [81]. After centrifugation, the RNA pellet was washed with 80% ethanol and the pellet was resuspended in 1M Aniline pH 4.5 and incubated for 15 min at 60°C in the dark [82] The reaction was stopped by ethanol precipitation using 3M Na-OAc, pH 5.2 and glycoblue. The pellet was washed twice with 80% ethanol, dried and resuspended in 3.5 μL of nuclease free water. RNA fragments were converted to sequencing library using the NEBNext® Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina® (NEB ref E7330S, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA library was quantified using a fluorometer (Qubit 3.0 fluorometer, Invitrogen, USA) and qualified using a High Sensitivity DNA chip on Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. Libraries were multiplexed and subjected to high-throughput sequencing on an Illumina NextSeq2000 instrument with a 50 bp single-end read mode.

High quality raw sequencing reads (> Q30) were subjected to trimming using Trimmomatic v0.39 [83] with the following parameters: MINLEN:08, STRINGENCY:7, AVGQUAL:30, trimmed reads were used for alignment without further processing. Trimmed reads were aligned to the S. pneumoniae D39 tRNA sequences extracted from the gtRNAdb [84] using bowtie2 v2.4.4 [85]in end-to-end mode (--no-unal --no-1mm-upfront -D 15 -R 2 -N 0 -L 10 -i S,1,1.15 as other bowtie2 parameters), only uniquely mapped reads in positive orientation were retained for further analysis. 5’-reads’ extremities were counted for each RNA position in the reference; all further steps were performed in R/R-studio environment. After a −1 shift in the sequence position, since ligated 5’-P extremity is at the N+1 nucleotide in the RNA sequence, this reads’ count was used as the measure for intensity of cleavage at a given position. Four scores were used for analysis of AlkAnilineSeq raw data [80,81]: normalized cleavage (NCleavage), normalized count (NormCount), normalized G count (NormGcount) and stop ratio. Normalized cleavage corresponds to 1000x proportion of reads starting at a given position to the total number of reads mapped to a given RNA sequence. This score is less noisy but also less sensitive than others and is well-suited for detection of major cleavage events in RNA. In contrast, stop ratio (closely derived from ψ-ratio used for analysis of Ψ-seq data [86]) is calculated as a ratio of reads starting at a given position to the total number of reads passing (covering) it. This score is relatively sensitive, but also noisy. The last two scores used, NormCount and NormGcount use local normalization to the median of cleavage signals in ±5 nt window around of analysed position. NormCount uses all cleavage signals in the window, while signals corresponding to G residues are excluded from calculation of the normalization median for NormGcount. These scores represent the intensity of the cleavage at a given nucleotide compared to the local cleavage background in the adjacent RNA region. None of AlkAnilineSeq scores show linear dependence between the score’s value and stoichiometry of RNA modification, stop ratio has linear segment at very low modification levels (<5%), while the three other scores better represent the modification stoichiometry at higher modification levels in RNA (5–50%).

Analysis of tRNA modifications by GLORI

GLORI is based on deamination and includes a glyoxal treatment that serves as a ‘protection’ step, selectively masking guanosine residues from nitrite (NO2)-induced deamination. This is followed by deprotection and reverse transcription to convert RNA into cDNA. The conditions used were as described in [87]. Briefly, 100 ng of tRNA samples were subjected to glyoxal treatment for 30 min at 50°C, followed by a boric acid treatment for 30 min at 50°C. The protected RNA is then subjected to nitrite-mediated deamination followed by RNA deprotection in a buffer containing 500 mM TEAA and formamide. RNA was then precipitated, end-repaired, and purified before being subjected to library preparation with NEBNext small RNA library following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and quantity of each library were assessed using a high-sensitivity DNA Chip on a Bioanalyzer 2100 and a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer. High throughput sequencing of the multiplexed libraries was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 2000 instrument in a 2×50 nt paired-end mode. Raw sequencing reads were inspected with FastQC and adapter sequence was removed by trimmomatic v0.39 [83]. Alignment to the A->G converted tRNA reference sequence (S. pneumoniae D39 tRNA sequences) was done by Bowtie2. v2.4.4 [70] with slightly relaxed alignment stringency, allowing the retention of 1 nt-mismatched reads. Further analysis was done by samtools mpileup utility and counting the mismatch profile at every position in the reference. Since RNA A residues were de-aminated to inosines, sequencing reads are expected to contain only CGT nucleotides and thus align perfectly to A->G converted tRNA reference sequence. However, the residual A residues observed in the sequence data correspond to deamination-resistant modified As (m6A and all other N6-modified A, m1A was also detected). In the case of partial modification, both G and A are detected at a given position. Thus, the mismatch G in a reference to A in the sequencing read can be used as a score to measure a molar ratio of modified A in RNA (GtoA score). Raw AlkAnilineSeq and GLORI data are available at the European Nucleotide Archive under the accession number PRJEB96333.

Results

Combining LC-MS/MS, tRNAseq, and in silico analysis to predict tRNA modification genes in two model Streptococci.

Over several years and studies [24,36], we performed LC-MS/MS analysis of bulk tRNA isolated from different S. mutans UA919 and S. pneumoniae D39 derivatives (13 independent S. mutans tRNA samples and 20 independent S. pneumoniae tRNA samples (Table S1 and Sup data 2BCDE). By comparing retention times of chromatographic peaks in hydrolyzed tRNAs with those of synthetic standards, our analysis identified 31 modifications in S. mutans tRNAs and 32 modifications in S. pneumoniae tRNAs (Supplemental Data 2BC and 3). Not all these modified nucleosides are from tRNAs. It is well known that modifications derived from contaminating 16S and 23S rRNA can be detected in high quantities in LC/MS analyses of nucleoside digests from tRNA preparations [20]. In addition, some modifications may originate from media contamination [85,86] or have non-enzymatic origins, such as m1A, m3C, or m7G [88]. Hence, LC/MS needs to be combined with tRNA-Seq and computational predictions to map the modifications on tRNA molecules and establish the links between tRNA modifications and their corresponding genes.

Two complementary strategies were employed to identify the tRNA modification enzymes encoded in the S. mutans UA159 genome. First, we used a curated set of 44 B. subtilis tRNA modification proteins (Supplemental Data 1A) to perform BLAST searches against the predicted proteomes of S. mutans UA159 (RefSeq Assembly: GCA_000007465.2) and S. pneumoniae D39 (RefSeq Assembly: GCA_000014365.1) to identify homologs. In parallel, we leveraged a curated list of orthologous groups from the COG and KEGG (KO) databases, mapped across ~1,000 bacterial genomes [Reed C.J. and de Crécy-Lagard V. (unpublished) and Supplemental Data 4], to assess presence/absence patterns and cross-reference them with the BLAST hits. Integrating these datasets with our LC/MS profiles nucleosides in both S. mutans and S. pneumoniae (Fig. 1; Supplemental Data 1BCD).

We infer that several nucleosides detected by LC/MS—including acp3U, m2G, m22G, m3C, m3U, m C, and m , A, originate from rRNA or media contaminations, as no candidate tRNA-modifying enzymes were found for their incorporation. Putative rRNA-modifying enzymes could be identified for all of these, except for m3C and acp3U (Supplemental Data 2F). Traces of acp3U were observed exclusively in S. pneumoniae, likely due to contamination from the sheep blood in the TSAII-BA growth medium. Similarly, the traces of Q in S. pneumoniae samples are likely from media contamination (see section below). Both m3C and m5C were detected in both Streptococci, but no m4C was detected (Supplemental Data 3). The presence of SunL (16S rRNA m5C967-methyltransferase) homologs in both species (Supplemental Data 2F) suggests that m5C is indeed a rRNA modification. However, m3C had not been detected in bacterial RNAs to date [79], and homologs of RsmH that generally catalyze the insertion of m4C in rRNA were identified in both Streptococci (Supplemental Data 2F). Hence, in this case, the in silico and the LC/MS data did not match, warranting further investigations. As m Cm is a conserved bacterial 30S rRNA modification [79] [and both Streptococcal genomes encode orthologs of E. coli RsmI (Supplemental Data 2F)—an enzyme responsible for 2’-O-methylation of C1402 in 16S rRNA [89]—we revisited our initial analysis and found that m Cm was indeed present in our tRNA samples (Supplemental Data 3). To confirm this presence was due to contaminating rRNA fragments, we quantified m Cm levels in bulk rRNA and tRNA extracted from S. mutans UA159 and indeed found them to be 750-fold higher in rRNA than tRNA (Supplemental Data 2F and 3). The LC/MS analysis of nucleosides derived from S. mutans rRNA samples confirmed m2G, m2, 2G, m3U, m C, and m , A were only present in rRNAs, while Gm, Ψ, m7G, m5U, and possibly D were found in both rRNAs and tRNAs. This analysis also showed that m3C was only present in traces in rRNA and was certainly derived from a contamination or a non-enzymatic reaction in our tRNA samples. Finally, no Am was detected in rRNA; hence, we cannot rule out that this modification is enzymatically inserted in tRNA by TrmL or an as-yet-unknown enzyme.

Based on enzyme predictions and the LC/MS data, we estimate that 21 of the 31 nucleosides detected in S. mutans and 19 of the 32 in S. pneumoniae derive from tRNAs. AlkAnilineSeq and GLORI analyzes allowed us to specifically map the D, m1A, m7G, t6A, m6A and i6A modifications in S. pneumoniae tRNAs sequences (Fig. 2C and Fig. S2). Exact mapping of Ψ/Um/Cm/Gm and potentially Am in specific tRNAs would require additional analyses.

Figure 2. S. pneumoniae tRNA modifications mapped by sequencing-based modification detection methods.

Figure 2.

(A) Alkaline Seq analysis of tRNA extracted from WT and ΔdusB1 S. pneumoniae Representative AlkAnilineSeq profiles showing signals for D (at positions 17, 20, 20a) and m7G (at position 46) in the WT and ΔdusB1 strains. Ncleavage score is shown in the same scale, nucleotide color code and strain identity are shown on the right. AlkAniline-Seq signals are measures for biological triplicate (n=3) and the average value is shown, along with the error bar (calculated using the R ggplot2 package). Individual points for replicates are shown in grey. tRNA residues are numbered in sequential order, so position number may not correspond to conventional tRNA numbering (including 17a, 20a/b, and variable loop); (B) Heatmap for absolute Ncleavage values observed upon AlkAnilineSeq analysis of most modified D sites mapped in S. pneumoniae WT and ΔdusB1 strains. The color code is shown at the bottom right, and the identity of the D site in tRNA is indicated. Data are shown for all replicates (n=3) for WT and ΔDusB strains; (C) Summary of all AlkAniline-Seq -detected modified residues in S. pneumoniae tRNAs. m1A residues are shown in orange, m7G are in green. Identity of tRNAs harboring these modifications is shown; (D) Representative GLORI profiles detecting m1A and i6A residues in S. pneumoniae tRNA. The signal in GLORI corresponds to non-deaminated (NO2-resistant) A residues (m1A and N6-substuituted A residues). Data for WT and ΔtsaE strain are shown. Nucleotide color code is shown on the right. tRNA residues are numbered in sequential order, so position number may not correspond to conventional tRNA numbering (including 17a, 20a/b, and variable loop); (E) Heatmap of the GLORI signals for all detectable modifications (m1A, m6A, i6A and t6A). The color code is shown on the top. Identity of tRNA modified site is indicated on the right. (F) Summary of all GLORI-detected modified residues in S. pneumoniae tRNAs. m1A residues are shown in light blue, N6-substituted A37 residues are in violet. A*37 indicates N6-substituted A which occurs in the sequence different from contexts AAA (for i6A) and UAA (for t6A), most likely these tRNAs harbor m6A modification. Identity of tRNAs harboring these modifications is shown.

The main difference between B. subtilis and S. mutans is the absence of the ms2i6A, ms2t6A, and ct6A-derived modifications and the corresponding enzymes (MiaB, MtaB, and TcdA) (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Data 1B). In addition, the loss of one of the DusB2 orthologs and the absence of the alternate GTP cyclohydrolase IB/MtrA reduce the number of tRNA modification genes from 44 in B. subtilis to 39 in S. mutans (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Data 1B). The same gene/modification losses were also observed in S. pneumoniae, but a further decay of complex modification pathways, such as the previously reported loss of MnmL [24] and the decay of the Q pathway described below, led to a final count of 33 tRNA modification genes in this respiratory pathogen (Fig. 1 and Sup data 1C).

DusB1 is responsible for all D synthesis at positions 17, 20, and 20a in S. pneumoniae

S. mutans and S. pneumoniae only encode a DusB1, whereas B. subtilis encodes DusB1 and DusB2 ([23] and Fig, 1). To determine which positions were modified by DusB1 in S. pneumoniae, the corresponding gene (spd_2016) was deleted, and AlkAnilineSeq was performed on tRNA extracted from the WT and ΔdusB1 strains. We found that dusB1 was responsible for the formation of D17, 20, and 20a, as all three modifications disappeared in the mutant (Fig. 2AB and Fig. S2). In the process, we mapped the D residues in 40 S. pneumoniae tRNAs (Fig. S2). We suggest that the DusB1 proteins of S. mutans and S. pneumoniae have similar catalytic profiles (Fig. 1),

In B. subtilis, tRNAMetCAU harbors a D at position 47 which was identified by LC/MS of the T1 fragments tRNA, that D47 can only be seen by AlkAnilineSeq in a trmB mutant, so that the m7G46 signal does not overshadow the D signal [23]. Hence, we cannot formally rule out the presence of D47 in S. pneumoniae in this tRNA. Recent analysis of S. aureus tRNA modification profiles [27] shows that D47 is not found in any tRNA; hence, we did not include this modification in our predictions (Fig. 1), even if the final call would require additional experiments.

During the mapping of D residues by AlkAnilineSeq, we also identified multiple m7G46 modifications in S. pneumoniae tRNAs (Fig. 2AB and Fig. S2A and, unexpectedly, several U8 also give an AlkAnilineSeq signal, presumably corresponding to the predicted s4U8. This observation was further confirmed by analysis of the mismatch score at those positions. As anticipated, all AlkAnilineSeq signals at position 8 were also detected as partial U->C transitions, which is a characteristic feature of s4U, base pairing with A, but also with G residues during the reverse transcription step (Fig. S2B). However, we believe that methods allowing specific s4U detection [90] should be used to map these modifications comprehensively and thus did not include them in our summary.

S. pneumoniae salvages preQ1 and not preQ0, as predicted from metabolic reconstruction and stops at the intermediate oQ.

Metabolic reconstruction of the S. pneumoniae Q synthesis pathway (Fig. 3A and S3, Supplemental Data S1CD) predicts that, unlike S. mutans, which is a Q prototroph, S. pneumoniae cannot synthesize preQ0 de novo due to the absence of the queCDE genes [38]. However, the presence of queT and queF homologs suggests that S. pneumoniae can salvage preQ0, reduce it to preQ1, and incorporate it into tRNA via the signature enzyme TGT (Fig. 3A). Notably, homologs of queG and queH—two non-orthologous enzymes that catalyze the final step of Q biosynthesis—are missing. This indicates that the pathway in S. pneumoniae likely halts at the penultimate step: the formation of epoxyQ-tRNA (oQ-tRNA) from preQ1-tRNA catalyzed by QueA (Fig. 3A and S3). Such an incomplete Q pathway is highly unusual, with only one other documented case to date [91].

Figure 3. Decay of Q pathway in S. pneumoniae and other Streptococci.

Figure 3.

(A) Predicted Q pathway in S. pneumoniae D39, with protein names shown in blue and locus tags in red. The ECF transporters include 4 subunits: S, the substrate-specific transmembrane component (QueT); T, the energy-coupling module; A and A’, a pair of ATPase; (B) S. pneumoniae salvages preQ1 to synthesize oQ in tRNAs. The wild-type strain IU1824 was cultured in BHI medium supplemented with DMSO, 100 nM preQ0 base, or 100 nM preQ1 base. tRNAs were isolated, enzymatically digested, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS as described in the Materials and Methods section. For each analysis, 600 ng of hydrolyzed tRNAs was injected. The identities of the preQ1 and Q peaks were confirmed by comparing them to the retention times of their synthetic standards. The identity of the oQ peak was confirmed through high-resolution LC-MS analysis, as detailed in the Materials and Methods and Results sections. Relative abundance for each modified ribonucleoside was calculated by normalizing its raw peak area to the sum of UV signals from the four canonical ribonucleosides. Reported averages and standard deviations are based on data from three independent growth experiments; (C) The distribution of different pathways of 7-deazaguanine modification in tRNA in 1,599 Streptococcus. The four major pathways are de novo Q biosynthesis (red), preQ0 salvage Q modification (blue), preQ1 salvage Q modification (green), and preQ1 salvage oQ modification (yellow), with the others (gray) consisting of Q gene patterns that were found in no more than two strains; (D) The Q gene distribution for each category. The Q biosynthesis and Q precursor transportation is depicted in the top panel. Each arrow represents one reaction catalyzed by the enzyme underneath. Dashed arrows represent Q precursor transmembrane salvage via transporter proteins. The presence and absence of each Q gene is indicated by the corresponding filled and open square. The presence of a pseudogene is indicated by a half-shaded square; (E) The composition (number of strains) of species for each type of Q gene pattern. For better visualization, less abundant species collapsed.

In our initial LC-MS analysis, S. pneumoniae was grown in BHI medium without added preQ0 or preQ1 (Supplemental Data 2C). Only trace amounts of Q were detected, likely due to media contamination. In contrast, oQ levels were ~20–30 times higher in S. pneumoniae than in S. mutans (Supplemental Data 2BC). The identity of the oQ modification was confirmed using high-resolution LC-MS with targeted SIM and MS/MS analyses. SIM data showed excellent agreement between the observed m/z (426.1608) and the theoretical m/z (426.1619) for the protonated oQ ion, with a mass error < 3 ppm (Fig. S4). MS/MS analysis of m/z 426.1619 yielded major fragment ions at m/z 295.1035 (<1 ppm error) and 163.0616 (<2 ppm error), corresponding to the 7-methyl-7-deazaguanosine and 7-methyl-7-deazaguanine moieties of oQ, confirming its identity.

oQ levels in S. pneumoniae remained ~10-fold lower than the Q levels observed in S. mutans (Supplemental Data 2BC). Because tRNAs were initially extracted from cells grown in undefined media with unknown concentrations of preQ0/preQ1, we repeated the experiment with 100 nM preQ0 supplementation. However, oQ levels were unchanged (Fig. 3B and Supplemental Data 2D). This was unexpected given the presence of QueT (predicted to transport preQ0/preQ1) [36] and QueF predicted to reduce preQ0 into preQ1 [38]. Upon closer inspection, the S. pneumoniae D39 QueF was found to be lack catalytic residues: it is a fusion of an N-terminal QueC fragment and a C-terminal QueF domain lacking the catalytic cysteine essential for thiamide adduct formation with preQ0 (FigS5) [92]. We then repeated the experiment with 100 nM preQ1 instead. This led to a substantial (>100-fold) increase in oQ levels and high accumulation of preQ1 in S. pneumoniae tRNA, while the trace Q levels remained unchanged (Fig. 3B and Supplemental Data 2D). The result was supported by the observation that all TGTs from Streptococcus have a substrate binding motif that resembles E. coli TGT which takes preQ1 as the substrate (Fig. S6).

In summary, unlike S. mutans UA159, which encodes a fully functional de novo Q synthesis pathway [36], S. pneumoniae D39 has lost the capacity to synthesize preQ1 but can still salvage this precursor to insert it into tRNAs. In this organism, the pathway also stops at the oQ-tRNA intermediate. These findings led us to conduct a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis of Q synthesis and salvage genes in sequenced Streptococci to evaluate the variability of the Q pathway across the entire clade.

Plasticity of Q biosynthesis pathways in Streptococci as seen with numerous gene losses and pseudogene accumulation

We analyzed the distribution of queuosine (Q) synthesis and salvage genes in 1,599 Streptococcus genomes, selected based on genome completeness (Fig. 3CD; Supplemental Data S1E). 1598 strains are predicted to harbor a deazaguanine modification in tRNA, as they all encode a functional TGT enzyme, the remaining one is likely to be a sequencing error. QueA, the next enzyme in the pathway catalyzing the synthesis of oQ-tRNA from preQ1-tRNA [38] is also highly prevalent, making it unlikely that preQ1 is the final incorporated base, unlike in Bartonella species [93]. Fewer than 20% of the species analyzed synthesize Q de novo, a group that includes many Streptococcus thermophilus isolates, all examined strains of Streptococcus salivarius, S. mutans, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis (common inhabitants of oral cavity), and the group D streptococci S. gallolyticus and S. equinus which inhabit the GI tract of mammals (Fig. 3CD). Notably, Streptococcus species that synthesize preQ1 never encode both non-orthologous enzymes that can catalyze the hydrolytic reduction/deoxygenation of oQ (QueG or QueH). Instead, they encode only one or the other (Fig. 3CD). By contrast, 755 strains—mainly Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus suis—encode both QueG and QueH, yet all of these are auxotrophic for preQ1. Most Streptococci (~80%) must rely on preQ1 salvage (Fig. 3C). In line with the prevalence of preQ1 salvage, orthologs of QueT or QPTR are found in most Streptococci analyzed (Fig. 3D). Finally, we found that the termination of the pathway at the oQ step, which we experimentally validated in S. pneumoniae D39 (Fig. 3B), is predicted to occur in ~15% of the strains analyzed. Many of these harbor queH and queG pseudogenes, detected in 131 and 39 strains, respectively (Fig. 3CD). Gene losses and decay were also prevalent with the queF genes. 116 unique QueF sequences of two types were found in 544 Streptococcus strains: canonical QueF and inactive QueCF fusion, like the one found in the S pneumoniae D39 strain (Fig. 3CD and Fig. 4 and S5). All the 220 analyzed S. pneumoniae genomes encode defective QueCF fusions (Fig. 4B)

Figure 4. Two types of QueF proteins are found in Streptococcus.

Figure 4.

(A) The MSA of 116 unique QueF or QueCF from 544 Streptococcus strains. The boxed region indicates the N-terminus that do not align; (B) The corresponding Q genes and species of 544 QueF encoding Streptococcus strains. RefSeq accessions for all proteins listed are given in Supplemental Data S1F.

We also identified the Streptococci orthologs of QueK enzymes that hydrolyze the Q nucleoside to liberate the queuine (q) (Supplemental Data 1E), QueK proteins are members of the superfamily isine/uridine-preferring nucleoside hydrolase (IPR023186) family, but members of the QueK subgroup can be separated from the other members of this large family using Sequence Similarity Networks (SSNs) ([40] and Fig. S7A). Indeed, we found that QueK homologs from Streptococci are grouped with the experimentally validated QueK from Clostridioides difficile 630 (QueK Cd in Fig. S7A). Most genomes in this cluster lack queDECF genes but encode TGT. In addition, the majority of queK genes in this cluster, including those from Streptococcus, are next to genes encoding QueT family transporters (Fig. S7B). Hence, it is likely that QueK orthologs in Streptococcus function as queuosine hydrolase. However, no QueL orthologs could be identified in the analyzed Streptococcus genomes (Supplemental Data 1E). QueA orthologs are always present (Fig. 3CD), and the encoded Tgt proteins are all of the canonical preQ1 inserting/bacterial type [94] (Fig. S6). Hence, it is not clear what the fate of the released q base would be in Streptococci. One cannot rule out the possibility that a non-orthologous enzyme yet to be discovered replaces QueL to generate preQ1 in these organisms.

To investigate the potential impact of oQ on synonymous codon usage of the GUN Q-dependent codons (Tyr, His, Asp and Asn), we compared codon usage of 26 of the 234 S. pneumoniae strains in our dataset predicted to harbor oQ each to a closely related Streptococci ( >92% identity) not belonging to the S. pneumoniae clade (Supplemental Data 1F). We found that S. pneumoniae strains exhibited a higher NAU-to-NAC ratio (Fig. S8A), which was primarily attributed to the Tyr and His codon biases (Fig. S8CF). However, this difference could be a result of difference in GC content (Fig. S8B) (Supplemental Data 1F) as this can be a driver the choice of the wobble base [95]and more extensive analyses will be required to separate these effects.

Survey of the essentiality of tRNA modification genes in S. mutans and S. pneumoniae reveals differences between the two clades

Based on published studies [96100] and TnSeq data generated as described in the methods section, we compiled essentiality data for all predicted S. mutans UA150 and S. pneumoniae D39 tRNA modification genes (Supplemental Data 1BC). As expected from the literature [17], trmD and tilS were essential in both species. IscS1 and mnmA, both involved in the synthesis of s2U34 were also essential in both species, whereas they can be deleted in both E. coli and B. subtilis [101,102] . Discrepancies between TnSeq data, which often report mnmA as essential, including in E. coli [103], and targeted deletion studies showing that mnmA is frequently dispensable [104] can be explained by the severely impaired growth of mnmA mutants [101,102] which leads to their counterselection in pooled populations. It appears that mnmA is essential in Streptococci, as directly targeting the genes for deletion in S. mutans was unsuccessful (Supplemental Data 1B).

The tadA gene is essential in E. coli but not in organisms such as B. subtilis [105,106] or S. aureus [Marzi], even if it is not totally clear why the unmodified tRNAArgACG can decode all CGN codons in B. subtilis and not in E. coli [105]. TadA is not essential in S. mutans, and the two current studies utilizing two different growth media disagree on the essentiality of the gene in S. pneumoniae (Supplemental Data 1BC); therefore, additional targeted genetic experiments will be necessary.

If no gene was found to be essential only in S. mutans, several genes were essential only in S. pneumoniae including mnmEG and tsaBCDE. MmnEG encoding genes are generally not essential in Streptococci, even if their absence leads to virulence defects [3134]. We had previously confirmed that t6A was not essential in S. mutans as tsaB, tsaC and tsaE deletions were viable and devoid of t6A [37]. In contrast, all four t6A pathway-related genes seem to be essential in S. pneumoniae (Supplemental Data S1C, Fig 5A and S9).

Figure 5. TsaE is essential in S.pneumoniae D39.

Figure 5.

(A) Mini-Mariner Malgellan6 Tn-Seq transposon insertion profile for the genome region covering spd_1740 (cinA), spd_1741 (lytR), spd1742, spd_1743 (tsaE) and spd_1744 (comM) in the genomes of the unencapsulated WT parent (D39 Δcps rpsL1, IU1824) strain growing exponentially in BHI broth in 5% CO2. The same WT Tn-seq insertion profile was obtained for encapsulated D39 strain IU1781 grown in BHI broth (data not shown). In vitro transposition reactions containing purified genomic DNA, Magellan6 plasmid DNA, and purified MarC9 mariner transposase, transformation, harvesting of transposon-inserted mutants, growth of pooled insertion libraries exponentially in BHI broth, NextSeq 75 high-output sequencing, and analysis were performed as described in Materials and Methods based on [73]. Tn-insertions were recovered in the regions encoding spd_1740, spd_1742 and spd_1744, but not in spd_1741(lytR) and spd_1743 (tsaE). (B) Representative growth curves of the WT parent (IU1824), ΔtsaE (sup1) (IU18824), and ΔtsaE complementation strain (IU18963, ΔtsaE markerless//ΔbgaA::Pzn-tsaE). tsaE deletion strains containing suppressor mutation asnS(D121A) are viable but have higher doubling time and lower yield in BHI growth media, and the growth phenotypes are complemented by ectopic tsaE expression. IU18824 was whole-genome-sequenced to contain asnS(D121A) mutation. IU1824 and IU18824 were grown overnight in BHI broth with no additional Zn2+/Mn2+ addition. IU18963 was grown overnight and day of experiment in BHI broth with additional 0.1 mM (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) to induce expression of tsaE from the ectopic bgaA site. Overnight cultures were diluted to OD620 ≈0.003 in the morning in BHI broth for IU1824 and IU18824 and in BHI broth containing 0.1 mM Zn2+/(1/10)Mn2+ for IU18963. Doubling times (DT) and maximal growth yields (OD620) (averages ± SE) were obtained during 9 h of growth from 2 independent experiments. (C) and (D) ΔtsaE cells with an asnS mutations are smaller but with the same shape as WT strain, and the ΔtsaE cell morphology phenotype is complemented by ectopic expression of tsaE+ (C) Representative phase-contrast images taken at mid-log growth between 3 to 3.5 h for IU1824 and IU18963 (OD620 between 0.1 to 0.2), and between 3.5 to 4.0 h for IU18824 (OD620 between 0.03 to 0.05). Scale bar = 1 μm. (D) Scatter plots of cell lengths, widths, aspect ratios (cell length to width) and relative cell volumes of the above strains. Lines represent median and 25 and 75 percentiles. IU18963 was grown with 0.1 mM Zn2+ (Zn2+/(1/10) Mn2+) shown in (B). Pvalues were obtained by one-way ANOVA analysis (GraphPad Prism, Kruskal-Wallis test). **** and ns denote p<0.0001, and not significant, respectively when compared to WT.

t6A synthesis genes are essential in S. pneumoniae, but a suppressor mutation in asnS make tsaE deletion strains viable.

We confirmed the essentiality of the tsaE gene in S. pneumoniae by attempting to transform ΔtsaE amplicons into the unencapsulated IU1824 (D39 Δcps rpsL1) or IU1945 (D39 Δcps rpsL+) background. No transformants were recovered in the wild-type strains, whereas normal colony formation was observed in a strain expressing tsaE ectopically under the control of a zinc-inducible promoter (Table 1). WT strains transformed with tsaE deletion amplicons did appear after 40 hours of growth, most certainly having acquired suppressor mutations. Growth of ΔtsaE clones was affected compared to WT, and the growth defect was complemented by tsaE expression in trans (Fig. 5B and Fig. 6AB). The ΔtsaE cells were slightly smaller but the same shape as WT cells (Fig. 6CD). Whole genome sequencing of four independent ΔtsaE strains obtained from two different genetic backgrounds and two deletion markers revealed that all of them had acquired a mutation [asnS(D121A)] encoding asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS) (Table 2). To confirm that the presence of asnS(D121A) mutation can suppress the lethality of ΔtsaE, we constructed an isogenic set of strains expressing asnS+ in the native chromosomal locus and an ectopic copy of either asnS+ or asnS(D121A). The presence of an ectopic copy of asnS(D121A), but not WT asnS allows the growth of a ΔtsaE strain (Table 2 and Fig. 6B). This result indicates that asnS(D121A) is a gain-of-function mutation, consistent with the structural model described below (Fig. 7). Analysis of t6A levels in these strains by LC-MS (Fig. 6CD) and tRNA seq (GLORI) (Fig. 2DE) showed that t6A was indeed absent in the ΔtsaE strains.

Figure 6. Suppressor mutations in asnS gene allow growth of S. pneumoniae D39 t6-A-deficent strain.

Figure 6.

(A) tsaA deletion strains containing suppressor mutation asnS(D121A) are viable but have longer doubling time and lower yield in BHI growth media. Left panel, representative growth curves of the WT parent (IU1824, D39W rpsL1 Δcps) and mutants derived from this background, ΔtsaE (sup1) (IU18824, IU1824 ΔtsaE::Pc-erm sup1), and ΔtsaE (sup2) (IU18826, IU1824 ΔtsaE::Pc-kan-rpsL sup2). Right panel, representative growth curves of the WT parent (IU1945, D39W rpsL+ Δcps) and mutants derived from this background ΔtsaE (sup3), (E797, IU1945 ΔtsaE::Pc-erm sup3), and ΔtsaE (sup4) (K797, IU1945 ΔtsaE::Pc-kan-rpsL sup4). IU18824, IU18826, E797 and K797 were whole-genome-sequenced to contain asnS(D121A) mutation. Overnight cultures grown in BHI media were diluted to OD620 ≈0.003 in the morning in BHI broth. Doubling times (DT) and maximal growth yields (OD620) (averages ± SE) were obtained during 9h of growth from one experiment. (B) Representative growth curves of IU1690, IU1824, IU19598, IU18824, and IU19699. Expression of asnS(D121A) in the native genetic locus or at an ectopic site allows growth of tsaE deletion strains. IU1690 is D39W cps+ reference strain. IU1824 is D39 Δcps rpsL1, the WT parent strain for IU19598, IU18824, and IU19699. IU19598 is IU1824 ΔbgaA::P-asnS (D121A), harboring ectopic expression of asnS(D121A). IU18824 is IU1824 ΔtsaE::Pc-erm sup 1 (with suppressor mutation asnS [D121A]). IU19699 is IU1824 ΔbgaA::P-asnS (D121A) ΔtsaE::Pc-erm. This strain is reconstructed to confirm asnS (D121) suppression of ΔtsaE::Pc-erm. (C) Relative abundance of t6A in tRNAs isolated from IU1690, IU1824, IU19598, IU18824, and IU19699. tRNAs were isolated, enzymatically digested, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS as described in Methods section. For each analysis, 600 ng of hydrolyzed tRNAs was injected. The identity of the t6A peak was confirmed by comparing to the retention time of its synthetic standard. Relative abundance of t6A was calculated by normalizing its raw peak area to the sum of UV signals from the four canonical ribonucleosides. Reported averages and standard deviations are based on data from two independent growth experiments. Differences in t6A levels among the five strains were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of p < 0.05, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. Statistically significant differences were indicated by ****p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. (D) Changes in relative abundance of modified ribonucleosides in tRNAs isolated from IU1690, IU1824, IU19598, IU18824, and IU19699. Each grid cell represents the mean fold-change for each modified ribonucleoside in IU1690, IU19598, IU18824, and IU19699 relative to IU1824, calculated from two biological replicates. An exception applies to mnm5s2U, for which fold-changes were calculated relative to IU1690. Grey cells indicate LC-MS/MS signals below limit of detection. Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/), employing the Euclidean distance metric and the average linkage method to group both strains and modified ribonucleosides.

Table 2.

tsaE suppressor mutants of S. pneumoniae D39 contain asnS(D121A) (asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase) mutationa

Suppressor strainsc
Genome positionb Mutation Annotation Gene Description IU18824 (supl) IU18826d (sup2) E797 (sup3) K797 (sup4)
1,384,280 T→G D121A (GAC→ GCC) asnS asparaginyl-tRN A synthetase 100%e 100%e 100%e 100%e
a

S. pneumoniae has the highest mutation rate among all studied bacteria with functional DNA repair systems [140] and readily accumulates suppressor mutations of essential genes[69,72,75,141].

b

Whole-genome sequencing performed as described in Materials and Methods was used to identify suppressor mutations and to verify the genomes of constructed mutants. Genomic DNA preparation, DNA library construction, Illumina MiSeq DNA sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods.

c

Strains IU18824, IU18826, E797 and K797 (Table S1) containing suppressor mutations that allowed growth of a ΔtsaE mutant were isolated as described in Results.

d

IU18826 (sup2) has additional R191H (CGT→AT) mutation in spd_0982 pyrophosphokinase family protein at position 995,156.

e

Percentage of reads containing the indicated mutation

Figure 7. Structural model of AsnRS/tRNAAsn complex.

Figure 7.

(A) model of t6A-modified tRNAAsn bound to Streptococcus pneumoniae asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (SpAsnRS, purple), highlighting the inter-domain linker region (tan), potential interactions of linker residues with C67 in the base of the tRNA acceptor stem and with t6A37. The threonylcarbamoyl moiety of t6A37 is highlighted in cyan. (B) Structure-based multi-sequence alignment of AsnRS, ND-AspRS, and LysRS in the linker region (tan highlight). The conserved Asp/Glu corresponding to Asp121 of SpAsnRS is indicated with a red arrow. Residues putatively involved in D-stem and acceptor arm are indicated with black and blue stars, respectively. PDB IDs for the structures used in generating the alignment are indicated in the sequence headers. AF: AlphaFold model.

Profiling of the other rRNA/tRNA modifications by LC/MS showed that relative levels of all predicted rRNA modifications increased by 50% while all tRNA modifications (other than t6A) decreased by 20% (Supplemental data 2C and Fig. 6D). Based on well-established mechanistic links between cell stress and rRNA degradation [107,108], we believe the growth rate defect of the tsaE mutant strains leads to rRNA degradation and contamination of the tRNA preparations, which explains the changes in modification profiles.

Structural modeling suggests a role for t6A37 in tRNA/AsnRS interactions.

To gain structural insight into the role of Asp121 in S. pneumoniae AsnRS (SpAsnRS) function, we constructed a model of its complex with t6A-modified tRNAAsn (Fig. 7). Although crystal structures of AsnRS from several organisms are available, none include bound tRNA. The only available experimental structure of tRNAAsn is that of Pseudomonas aeruginosa tRNAAsn (PatRNAAsn) in complex with non-discriminating AspRS (PaND-AspRS, PDB ID 4WJ4 [109]), but this tRNA lacks the t6A37 modification. By contrast, recent high-resolution cryo-EM structures of human LysRS bound to ms2t6A37-modified human tRNALys3 (PDB IDs 9DPL and 9DPA [110]) provide insight into how a class IIb synthetase accommodates t6A37 in the anticodon loop and remodels the loop for recognition.

We used the AlphaFold2 model of SpAsnRS (SpAsnRS) [111], which closely resembles AsnRS crystal structures from diverse organisms, including Thermus thermophilus (PDB ID 5ZG8), Elizabethkingia sp. (PDB ID 6PQH, Pyrococcus horikoshii (PDB ID 1X54 [112]), Brugia malayi (PDB ID 2XGT [113]), Entamoeba histolytica (PDB ID 3M4Q) and Homo sapiens (PDB ID 8H53 [114]). The SpAsnRS model superposes with these orthologs with r.m.s.d. values of 0.945–1.564 Å over 294–333 Cα atoms and aligns well with other class IIb synthetases including E. coli AspRS (r.m.s.d. 2.23 Å over 269 Cα atoms) and E. coli LysRS (r.m.s.d 1.5 Å over 244 Cα atoms). PatRNAAsn was positioned onto SpAsnRS by superposing PaND-AspRS bound to tRNAAsn with SpAsnRS (r.m.s.d. 1.8 Å over 261 Cα atoms, 25% sequence identity, Fig. S10A). In parallel, the cryo-EM structure of human LysRS/tRNALys3 was superposed onto SpAsnRS to inform the placement and orientation of the anticodon-binding domain relative to a t6A37-modified anticodon loop (r.m.s.d 5.3 Å over 311 Cα atoms, 18% sequence identity, Fig. S10B). Together, these superpositions yielded a composite model of the SpAsnRS/tRNAAsn that integrates the conserved fold of class IIb synthetases with structural evidence for anticodon remodeling and t6A37 accommodation (Fig. 7A).

AsnRS, AspRS and LysRS-II are all class IIb synthetases that act on ANN-decoding tRNAs, substrates of the t6A pathway. They share a conserved architecture comprising an N-terminal anticodon binding domain, a C-terminal catalytic domain, and an intervening 25–30 residue linker/hinge region formed by a flexible, proline-rich loop and two short α-helices. This linker articulates the catalytic and anticodon-binding domains, making direct tRNA contacts and positioning the acceptor end in the active site through interactions with the acceptor arm and the D-stem minor groove [110,115117]. Our model suggests that these interactions are also possible in SpAsnRS/tRNAAsn. For example, Pro112 and His118 in SpAsnRS mimic the D-stem contacts made by Pro214 and Lys221 in human LysRS, respectively (Fig. S10B). In addition, Asp121 in SpAsnRS aligns with Glu224 in human LysRS and Glu122 in PaND-AspRS, each observed to form a hydrogen bond with the 2′-OH of ribose 67 at the base of the acceptor stem, a contact that is largely conserved among class IIb synthetases, consistent with the conservation of this acidic residue across the family (Fig. 7B).

Linker residues in LysRS engage the modified base ms2t6A37 in the anticodon loop: Phe218 stacks against, and His217 hydrogen bonds with, the threonylcarbamoyl group of ms2t6A37 (Fig. S10B). Our model places SpAsnRS residues Lys116 and Pro115 in analogous positions, suggesting similar interactions with t6A37 in t6A-modified tRNAAsn. When A37 is unmodified, this anticodon-loop contact is lost. Combined with the Asp121Ala substitution, which disrupts the acceptor-stem contact, the linker may be released to adopt an alternative conformation that maintains D-stem interactions. This flexibility provides a plausible route for SpAsnRS to function with unmodified tRNAAsn.

Based on the above structural analysis and the suppression phenotypes of strains carrying asnS(D121A) mutation, we hypothesize the following suppressor mechanism. t6A at position 37 of tRNA acts as a strong positive determinant with WT SpAsnRS, similar to the case of t6A and E. coli IleRS [43]. WT SpAsnRS can form a productive complex with t6A-modified tRNA, but not with unmodified tRNA. Since t6A-modified tRNAAsn is absent in a tsaE deletion mutant, the lack of Asn-charging leads to lethality of ΔtsaE cells. We hypothesize that SpAsnRS(D121A) encoded by the suppressor mutation asnS(D121A) allows the interaction of the synthetase with unmodified tRNA, leading to Asn charging for translation. However, this reaction is less efficient than that carried out by WT AsnRS with modified tRNA, resulting in slower growth in the suppressed strain. This model is consistent with the result showing asnS(D121A) as a gain-of-function mutation. The presence of AsnRS with this amino acid change is sufficient to allow cell growth, independent of the presence or absence of WT AsnRS.

Discussion

It is also well established that pathogenic bacteria tend to streamline their genomes compared to their environmental ancestors [118]. Accordingly, S. mutans and S. pneumoniae retain 87% (39/45) and 78% (35/45), respectively, of the tRNA modification genes found in B. subtilis (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Data 1ABC). What was unexpected, however, was that the majority of the lost genes encode Fe-S cluster –requiring enzymes. Specifically, 80% of the missing genes in S. mutans and 60% in S. pneumoniae fall into this category, including mnmL, queG, queE, mtaB, miaB, and tcdA (Fig. 1 and Supplemental data 1ABC). Previous studies had already noted that many widespread Fe–S-dependent metabolic proteins are absent in S. mutans and in other Gram-positive species [119]. In addition, the SUF system responsible for Fe–S cluster assembly is not essential in S. mutans, unlike in B. subtilis, because the essential Fe–S enzymes of isoprenoid synthesis (IspH and IspG) have been replaced in S. mutans by the Fe-S independent mevalonate pathway [120]. Hence, we see that the selective pressure in both these organisms has led to shedding hyper-modifications that require Fe–S enzymes, while still maintaining modifications in the same positions. S. mutans is exposed to a variety of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the oral cavity, such as H2O2 production by niche-competing early colonizers of dental plaque biofilm (S. gordonii, S. sanguinus) [121,122], periodontal inflammation [123], hypothiocyanite production by host salivary lactoperoxidase [124], and use of H2O2-containing dental care products. Given that Fe-S clusters are an important source of hydroxyl radical generation via Fenton chemistry during exposure to oxidative stress, it makes sense for S. mutans to minimize its reliance on Fe-S containing enzymes required for central physiological functions such as tRNA modification. One such specific example is the Q synthesis pathway. S. pneumoniae has lost the two Fe-S dependent enzymes of this pathway: QueE [125], involved in the preQ0 precursor synthesis, and QueG, involved in the last step, the reduction of oQ. However, we show that the pathway has not been lost and oQ accumulates in S. pneumoniae tRNA. Even if the Q modification has been repeatedly and independently lost in many clades [38], all the circa 1599 Streptococci genomes analyzed are predicted to still carry Q, or the Q precursor oQ, in target tRNAs, reinforcing its critical role in translation accuracy in this clade. This comparative work emphasizes the difficulty in predicting active pathways through metabolic reconstruction. Indeed, as we show here, pseudogenes can create false positive hits that can skew the pathway predictions: in this case, we predicted preQ0 salvage in S. pneumoniae when in reality, preQ0 is salvaged in this organism because the QueF homolog is not functional (Fig. 3).

The translation machinery is a classical target for antibacterial compounds with many known antibiotics targeting one aspect of translation or another (such as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, ribosome, translation factors)[126]. One aspect of translation that has not been targeted is tRNA modification, for two main reasons. First, it is only in the last decade that many of the genes/enzymes involved in tRNA modification have been identified at least in one model organism from each kingdom [6]. Second, only a handful of modification genes are essential in most pathogenic bacteria. These are the genes that introduce m1G37, k2C34, and t6A37. TrmD, the m1G37 methylase, was the first to be identified as an antibacterial target because it is very different from its human counterpart (Trm5), and inhibitors have already been identified [18,127]. TilS, the enzyme that introduces the k2C modification, is an obvious target as it is absent in eukaryotes [128]. TilS and TrmD are both essential in both S. mutans and S. pneumoniae (Supplemental data S1BC), hence any antibiotic targeting these enzymes should inhibit the growth of both these pathogens. The situation is not as clear-cut for t6A synthesis.

The differences between the bacterial and eukaryotic t6A synthesis machinery open the possibility of targeting this pathway for antibacterial compounds [41,42]. While the first enzyme of the pathway that produces threonylcarbamoyl adenylate, (TsaC in E. coli, Tsc2/Sua5 in yeast, YRDC in human) is very conserved across kingdoms [76], the second step of the pathway, the transfer of the threonylcarbamoyl moiety to the target adenosine, varies greatly (see [43] for review), with only one protein family (TsaD/Kae1/Qri7) in common between the different pathways. Mitochondria just require Qri7 to complete t6A synthesis, whereas Bacteria require TsaB and TsaE in addition to TsaD, and the whole KEOPS complex catalyzes this reaction in all eukaryotes [41,42]. Because of their prokaryotic-specific essentiality, the tsaBE genes had been identified as potential antibacterial targets before their role in t6A synthesis was even established [129134] and inhibitors of TsaE were developed based on its ATP-binding capabilities [135]. TsaE is essential in many bacterial pathogens, including nearly all ESKAPE pathogens (Supplemental Data S1J); however, it can be deleted in some pathogenic bacteria, such as S. mutans. We showed here that tsaE is essential in S. pneumoniae but a suppressor mutation in the asnS gene encoding AsnRS was readily selected, suggesting a role for t6A in AsnRS function in this organism. The mutation results in a D121A substitution in the coding sequence, which could increase flexibility of a linker region and compensate for the loss of anticodon loop interactions that normally depend on t6A37. In contrast, S. mutans AsnRS (SmAsnRS) retains the wild-type sequence in a ΔtsaE strain lacking t6A, indicating that t6A37 is not critical for SmAsnRS function. D121 is conserved in SmAsnRS, and the protein shares 80% sequence identity with SpAsnRS, including in the linker region (Fig. 7B), with predicted 3D structures that are virtually identical. Notably, S. pneumoniae and S. mutans tRNAAsn molecules differ by a single base pair (C5:G69 versus G5:C69, respectively; Fig. S10C), located adjacent to C67 in our docking model and near the contact point for D121. This difference may influence local geometry at the base of the acceptor stem in ways not evident in current structures, but the structural basis for the different requirements for t6A37 remains unclear. It is worth noting that in our study only one unique asnS mutation within the linker region was obtained among four independent mutants. In comparison, evolution repair studies of E. coli growth of trmD mutant strains show that growth of trmD mutants can be largely restored by single mutations in proS that restore aminoacylation of G37-unmodified tRNAPro [136]. However, the locations of the proS mutations were not restricted to any specific domains.

This study once again highlights the importance of integrating analytical, computational, and genetic approaches to accurately define tRNA modification profiles in a given organism [17]. Encouragingly, growing recognition of the biological significance of RNA modifications—combined with improved access to analytical technologies—has led to a surge of studies across taxonomically diverse species [21,22,27,93,137139]. These datasets now can serve as valuable anchors for bioinformatic and machine learning approaches to predict modification pathways in newly sequenced organisms.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (2.2MB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (54.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.docx (1MB, docx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (27.1KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Patricia Dos Santos and Frederic Barras for their helpful discussions, and Stefano Marzi for sharing unpublished data and providing input on the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01GM70641 and R35GM156215 to VdC-L, R01GM110588 to MAS, R01ES026856 to PCD, and R35GM131767 to MEW. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. CKC is supported by a Human Frontier Science Program Cross-Disciplinary Fellowship. PCD, CKC, JS, and GS were supported by the National Research Foundation of Singapore through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Antimicrobial Resistance Interdisciplinary Research Group.

Footnotes

Declaration of AI use

Grammarly (https://www.grammarly.com) and ChatGPT version 4.o (https://chatgpt.com/) were used to edit the grammar and clarity of specific sentences.

Data accessibility

Raw LC-MS/MS data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069173. Raw AlkAnilineSeq and GLORI data are available at the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home) under the accession number PRJEB96333.

References

  • 1.Lannes-Costa PS, de Oliveira JSS, da Silva Santos G, Nagao PE. 2021. A current review of pathogenicity determinants of Streptococcus sp. J Appl Microbiol. 131, 1600–1620. (doi: 10.1111/jam.15090) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, Cole JN, Gillen CM, Henningham A, Sriprakash KS, Sanderson-Smith ML, Nizet V. 2014. Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of group A Streptococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 27, 264–301. (doi: 10.1128/CMR.00101-13) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raabe VN, Shane AL. 2019. Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae). Microbiol Spectr 7, 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3–0007-2018. (doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0007-2018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bloch S, Hager-Mair FF, Andrukhov O, Schäffer C. 2024. Oral streptococci: modulators of health and disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 14, 1357631. (doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1357631) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lewis ML, Surewaard BGJ. 2018. Neutrophil evasion strategies by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Tissue Res. 371, 89–503. (doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2737-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.El Yacoubi B, Bailly M, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2012. Biosynthesis and function of posttranscriptional modifications of transfer RNAs. Annu Rev Genet 46, 69–95. (doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155641) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grosjean H, de Crécy-Lagard V, Marck C. 2010. Deciphering synonymous codons in the three domains of life: co-evolution with specific tRNA modification enzymes. FEBS Lett 584, 252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yared MJ, Marcelot A, Barraud P. 2024. Beyond the Anticodon: tRNA core modifications and their impact on structure, translation and stress adaptation. Genes (Basel). 15, 374. (doi: 10.3390/genes15030374) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fruchard L et al. 2024. Aminoglycoside tolerance in Vibrio cholerae engages translational reprogramming associated with queuosine tRNA modification. Elife, 13, RP96317. (doi: 10.1101/2022.09.26.509455) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Babosan A, Fruchard L, Krin E, Carvalho A, Mazel D, Baharoglu Z. 2022. Nonessential tRNA and rRNA modifications impact the bacterial response to sub-MIC antibiotic stress. microLife 3, uqac019. (doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqac019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Frommeyer YN et al. 2025. tRNA hydroxylation is an epitranscriptomic modulator of metabolic states affecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity. Nucleic Acids Res 53, gkaf719. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf719) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Durand JM, Dagberg B, Uhlin BE, Björk GR. 2000. Transfer RNA modification, temperature and DNA superhelicity have a common target in the regulatory network of the virulence of Shigella flexneri: the expression of the virF gene. Mol Microbiol 35, 924–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sato Y, Takita A, Suzue K, Hashimoto Y, Hiramoto S, Murakami M, Tomita H, Hirakawa H. 2024. TusDCB, a sulfur transferase complex involved in tRNA modification, contributes to UPEC pathogenicity. Sci Rep 14, 8978. (doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59614-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Antoine L, Bahena-Ceron R, Devi Bunwaree H, Gobry M, Loegler V, Romby P, Marzi S. 2021. RNA modifications in pathogenic bacteria: impact on host adaptation and virulence. Genes (Basel) 12, 1125. (doi: 10.3390/genes12081125) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kouvela A, Zaravinos A, Stamatopoulou V. 2021. Adaptor molecules epitranscriptome reprograms bacterial pathogenicity. Int J Mol Sci 22, 8409. (doi: 10.3390/ijms22168409) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koh CS, Sarin LP. 2018. Transfer RNA modification and infection – Implications for pathogenicity and host responses. Biochim Biophysa Acta Gene Reg Mech 1861, 419–432. (doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.01.015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Crécy-Lagard V, Jaroch M. 2021. Functions of bacterial tRNA modifications: from ubiquity to diversity. Trends Microbiol 29, 41–53. (doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.06.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhong W et al. 2019. Thienopyrimidinone derivatives that inhibit bacterial tRNA (guanine37-N(1))-methyltransferase (TrmD) by restructuring the active site with a tyrosine-flipping mechanism. J Med Chem 62, 7788–7805. (doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00582) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Crécy-Lagard V, Marck C, Brochier-Armanet C, Grosjean H. 2007. Comparative RNomics and Modomics in Mollicutes: prediction of gene function and evolutionary implications. IUBMB Life 59, 634–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Crécy-Lagard V, Ross RL, Jaroch M, Marchand V, Eisenhart C, Brégeon D, Motorin Y, Limbach PA. 2020. Survey and validation of tRNA modifications and their corresponding genes in Bacillus subtilis sp subtilis strain 168. Biomolecules 10, 977. (doi: 10.3390/biom10070977) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomasi FG, Kimura S, Rubin EJ, Waldor MK. 2023. A tRNA modification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis facilitates optimal intracellular growth. Elife 12, RP87146. (doi: 10.7554/eLife.87146) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koshla O, Vogt LM, Rydkin O, Sehin Y, Ostash I, Helm M, Ostash B. 2023. Landscape of post-transcriptional tRNA modifications in Streptomyces albidoflavus J1074 as portrayed by mass spectrometry and genomic data mining. J Bacteriol 205, e0029422. (doi: 10.1128/jb.00294-22) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sudol C et al. 2024. Functional redundancy in tRNA dihydrouridylation. Nucleic Acids Res 52, 5880–5894. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae325) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jaroch M et al. 2024. Alternate routes to mnm5s2U synthesis in Gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol 206, e0045223. (doi: 10.1128/jb.00452-23) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bou-Nader C, Montémont H, Guérineau V, Jean-Jean O, Brégeon D, Hamdane D. 2018. Unveiling structural and functional divergences of bacterial tRNA dihydrouridine synthases: perspectives on the evolution scenario. Nucleic Acids Res 46, 1386–1394. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1294) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Faivre B et al. 2021. Dihydrouridine synthesis in tRNAs is under reductive evolution in Mollicutes. RNA Biol 18, 2278–2289. (doi: 10.1080/15476286.2021.1899653) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jaramillo-Ponce JR et al. 2025 Complete landscape of post-transcriptional modifications in individual tRNAs from Staphylococcus aureus. bioRxiv 2025.10.30.685614; (doi:. 10.1101/2025.10.30.685614) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moukadiri I, Villarroya M, Benítez-Páez A, Armengod M-E. 2018. Bacillus subtilis exhibits MnmC-like tRNA modification activities. RNA Biol 15, 1167–1173. (doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1517012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moukadiri I, Garzon MJ, Björk GR, Armengod ME. 2014. The output of the tRNA modification pathways controlled by the Escherichia coli MnmEG and MnmC enzymes depends on the growth conditions and the tRNA species. Nucleic Acids Res 42, 2602–2623. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1228) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shippy D, Fadl A. 2014. tRNA Modification Enzymes GidA and MnmE: Potential role in virulence of bacterial pathogens. Int J Mol Sci 15, 18267–18280. (doi: 10.3390/ijms151018267) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cho KH, Caparon MG. 2008. tRNA Modification by GidA/MnmE is necessary for Streptococcus pyogenes Virulence: a new strategy to make live attenuated strains. Infect Immun 76, 3176–3186. (doi: 10.1128/IAI.01721-07) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li D, Shibata Y, Takeshita T, Yamashita Y. 2014. A novel gene involved in the survival of Streptococcus mutans under Stress Conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 80, 97–103. (doi: 10.1128/AEM.02549-13) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gao T, Tan M, Liu W, Zhang C, Zhang T, Zheng L, Zhu J, Li L, Zhou R. 2016. GidA, a tRNA modification enzyme, contributes to the growth, and virulence of Streptococcus suis Serotype 2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6, 44. (doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00044) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gao T et al. 2020. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses provide insights into the mechanism on arginine metabolism regulated by tRNA modification enzymes GidA and MnmE of Streptococcus suis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10, 597408. (doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.597408) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cho G, Lee J, Kim J. 2023. Identification of a novel 5-aminomethyl-2-thiouridine methyltransferase in tRNA modification. Nucleic Acids Res 51, 1971–1983. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad048) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jaroch M, Savage K, Kuipers P, Bacusmo JM, Hu J, Sun J, Dedon PC, Rice KC, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2025. Environmental control of queuosine levels in Streptococcus mutans tRNAs. Mol Microbiol 123, 48–59. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.15336) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bacusmo JM et al. 2018. The t(6)A modification acts as a positive determinant for the anticodon nuclease PrrC, and is distinctively nonessential in Streptococcus mutans. RNA Biol 15, 508–517. (doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1353861) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.de Crécy-Lagard V et al. 2024. Biosynthesis and function of 7-deazaguanine derivatives in bacteria and phages. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 88, e0019923. (doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00199-23) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Quaiyum S, Yuan Y, Kuipers PJ, Martinelli M, Jaroch M, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2024. Deciphering the diversity in bacterial transporters that salvage queuosine precursors. Epigenomes 8, 16. (doi: 10.3390/epigenomes8020016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yuan Y et al. 2019. Discovery of novel bacterial queuine salvage enzymes and pathways in human pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 19126–19135. (doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909604116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang W, Westhof E. 2025. The biology of tRNA t6a modification and hypermodifications—biogenesis and disease relevance. J Mol Biol 437, 169091. (doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169091) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Su C, Jin M, Zhang W. 2022. Conservation and diversification of tRNA t6A-modifying enzymes across the three domains of life. Int J Mol Sci 23, 13600. (doi: 10.3390/ijms232113600) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Thiaville PC et al. 2015. Essentiality of threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A), a universal tRNA modification, in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 98, 1199–221. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.13209) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.NCBI Resource Coordinators. 2016. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D7–D19. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1290) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O’Leary NA et al. 2016. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D733–D745. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1189) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Alvarez RV, Landsman D, Koonin E V. 2021. COG database update: Focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D274–D281. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li W, Cowley A, Uludag M, Gur T, McWilliam H, Squizzato S, Park YM, Buso N, Lopez R. 2015. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Res 43, W580–4. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv279) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Consortium U. 2021 UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D480–D489. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Paysan-Lafosse T et al. 2023 InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D418–D427. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac993) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. 2016. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D457–D462. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Burley SK et al. 2022. RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB.org): delivery of experimentally-determined PDB structures alongside one million computed structure models of proteins from artificial intelligence/machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D488–D508. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1077) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Olson RD et al. 2023. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D678–D689. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Elfmann C, Dumann V, van den Berg T, Stülke J. 2025. A new framework for Subti Wiki, the database for the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 53, D864–D870. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae957) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402. (doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, Von Haeseler A, Lanfear R, Teeling E. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37, 1530–1534. (doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52, W78–W82. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30, 772–780. (doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14, 1188–1190. (doi: 10.1101/gr.849004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zallot R, Oberg N, Gerlt JA. 2019. The EFI web resource for genomic enzymology tools: leveraging protein, genome, and metagenome databases to discover novel enzymes and metabolic pathways. Biochemistry 58, 4169–4182. (doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00735) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13, 2498–2504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Harrison KJ, de Crécy-Lagard V, Zallot R. 2018. Gene Graphics: A genomic neighborhood data visualization web application. Bioinformatics 34, 1406–1408. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx793) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2016. Mash: Fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 17. (doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.PyMol. In press. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8, Schrödinger, LLC. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pei J, Tang M, Grishin N V. 2008. PROMALS3D web server for accurate multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 36, W30–W34. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn322) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F. 1999. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15, 305–308. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lanie JA, Ng WL, Kazmierczak KM, Andrzejewski TM, Davidsen TM, Wayne KJ, Tettelin H, Glass JI, Winkler ME. 2007. Genome sequence of Avery’s virulent serotype 2 strain D39 of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with that of unencapsulated laboratory strain R6. J Bacteriol 189, 38–51. (doi: 10.1128/JB.01148-06) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Slager J, Aprianto R, Veening J-W. 2018. Deep genome annotation of the opportunistic human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Nucleic Acids Res 46, 9971–9989 (doi: 10.1093/nar/gky725) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tsui HCT, Zheng JJ, Magallon AN, Ryan JD, Yunck R, Rued BE, Bernhardt TG, Winkler ME. 2016. Suppression of a deletion mutation in the gene encoding essential PBP2b reveals a new lytic transglycosylase involved in peripheral peptidoglycan synthesis in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 100, 1039–65. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.13366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sung CK, Li H, Claverys JP, Morrison DA. 2001. An rpsL cassette, Janus, for gene replacement through negative selection in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 5190–6. (doi: 10.1128/aem.67.11.5190-5196.2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jacobsen FE, Kazmierczak KM, Lisher JP, Winkler ME, Giedroc DP. 2011. Interplay between manganese and zinc homeostasis in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Metallomics 3, 38–41. (doi: 10.1039/c0mt00050g) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rued BE et al. 2017. Suppression and synthetic-lethal genetic relationships of ΔgpsB mutations indicate that GpsB mediates protein phosphorylation and penicillin-binding protein interactions in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 103, 931–957. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.13613) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lamanna MM et al. 2022. Roles of RodZ and class A PBP1b in the assembly and regulation of the peripheral peptidoglycan elongasome in ovoid-shaped cells of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 118, 336–368. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.14969) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Carver TE et al. 2005. Decrypting the biochemical function of an essential gene from Streptococcus pneumoniae using ThermoFluor technology. J Biol Chem 280, 11704–11712. (doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413278200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tsui HCT et al. 2023. Negative regulation of MurZ and MurA underlies the essentiality of GpsB- and StkP-mediated protein phosphorylation in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 120, 351–38 (doi: 10.1111/mmi.15122) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Deatherage DE, Barrick JE. 2014. Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods Mol Biol 1151, 165–88. (doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chia JS, Lee YY, Huang PT, Chen JY. 2001. Identification of stress-responsive genes in Streptococcus mutans by differential display reverse transcription-PCR. Infect Immun 69, 2493–501. (doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2493-2501.2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hengesbach M et al. 2025. Toward standardized epitranscriptome analytics: an inter-laboratory comparison of mass spectrometric detection and quantification of modified ribonucleosides in human RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 53, gkaf895. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf895) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Boccaletto P et al. 2018. MODOMICS: A database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D303–D307. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Marchand V, Bourguignon-Igel V, Helm M, Motorin Y. 2021. Mapping of 7-methylguanosine (m7G), 3-methylcytidine (m3C), dihydrouridine (D) and 5-hydroxycytidine (ho5C) RNA modifications by AlkAniline-Seq. In Methods Enzymol 658, 25–47. (doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2021.06.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Marchand V et al. 2018. AlkAniline-Seq: Profiling of m7G and m3C RNA Modifications at Single Nucleotide Resolution. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 57, 16785–16790. (doi: 10.1002/anie.201810946) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Peattie DA, Gilbert W. 1980. Chemical probes for higher-order structure in RNA. Proc Natl AcadSci USA 77, 4679–4682. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chan PP, Lowe TM. 2016. GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D184–D189. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1309) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9, 357–359. (doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Schwartz S et al. 2014. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals widespread dynamic-regulated pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA. Cell 159, 148–162. (doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.028) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Shen W et al. 2024. GLORI for absolute quantification of transcriptome-wide m6A at single-base resolution. Nat Protoc 19, 1252–1287. (doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00937-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Reichle VF, Weber V, Kellner S. 2018. NAIL-MS in E. coli determines the source and fate of methylation in tRNA. ChemBioChem 19, 2575–2583. (doi: 10.1002/cbic.201800525) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kimura S, Suzuki T. 2010. Fine-tuning of the ribosomal decoding center by conserved methyl-modifications in the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1341–52. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1073). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bommisetti P, Bandarian V. 2022. Site-Specific Profiling of 4-thiouridine across transfer RNA genes in Escherichia coli. ACS Omega 7, 4011–402. (doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05071) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Phillipson DW, Edmonds CG, Crain PF, Smith DL, Davis DR, McCloskey. 1987. Isolation and structure elucidation of an epoxide derivative of the hypermodified nucleoside queuosine from Escherichia coli transfer RNA. J Biol Chem 262, 3462–3471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chikwana VM, Stec B, Lee BWK, de Crécy-Lagard V, Iwata-Reuyl D, Swairjo MA. 2012. Structural basis of biological nitrile reduction. J Biol Chem 287, 30560–30570. (doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.388538) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Quaiyum S, Sun J, Marchand V, Sun G, Reed CJ, Motorin Y, Dedon PC, Minnick MF, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2024. Mapping the tRNA modification landscape of Bartonella henselae Houston I and Bartonella quintana Toulouse. Front Microbiol 15, 1369018. (doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1369018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Stengl B, Reuter K, Klebe G. 2005. Mechanism and substrate specificity of tRNA-Guanine transglycosylases (TGTs): tRNA-modifying enzymes from the three different kingdoms of life share a common catalytic mechanism. Chem. Bio. Chem. 6, 1926–1939. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.López JL, Lozano MJ, Fabre ML, Lagares A. 2020. Codon usage optimization in the Prokaryotic Tree of Life: how synonymous codons are differentially selected in sequence domains with different expression levels and degrees of conservation. mBio 11, e00766–20. (doi: 10.1128/mBio.00766-20) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shields RC, Zeng L, Culp DJ, Burne RA. 2018. Genomewide identification of essential genes and fitness determinants of Streptococcus mutans UA159. mSphere 3, e00031–18. (doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00031-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Shields RC, Walker AR, Maricic N, Chakraborty B, Underhill SAM, Burne RA. 2020. Repurposing the Streptococcus mutans CRISPR-Cas9 system to understand essential gene function. PLoS Pathog 16, 1008344. (doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008344) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Quivey RG Jr et al. 2015. Functional profiling in Streptococcus mutans: construction and examination of a genomic collection of gene deletion mutants. Mol Oral Microbiol 30, 474–495. (doi: 10.1111/omi.12107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Janssen AB, Gibson PS, Bravo AM, de Bakker V, Slager J, Veening J-W. 2025. PneumoBrowse 2: an integrated visual platform for curated genome annotation and multiomics data analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res 53, D839–D851. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae923) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.St. Pierre J, Roberts J, Alam MA, Shields RC. 2024. Construction of an arrayed CRISPRi library as a resource for essential gene function studies in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Spectr 12, e0314923. (doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03149-23) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Black KA, dos Santos PC. 2015. Abbreviated pathway for biosynthesis of 2-thiouridine in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 196, 1952–62. (doi: 10.1128/JB.02625-14) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Urbonavicius J, Qian Q, Durand JMB, Hagervall TG, Björk GR. 2001. Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications. EMBO J, 20, 4863–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gurumayum S et al. 2021. OGEE v3: Online GEne Essentiality database with increased coverage of organisms and human cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D998–D1003. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa884) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kambampati R, Lauhon CT. 2003. MnmA and IscS are required for in vitro 2-thiouridine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 42, 1109–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Soma A et al. 2023. YaaJ, the tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase, is dispensable in Bacillus subtilis. Genes (Basel) 14, 1515. (doi: 10.3390/genes14081515) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liao W, Nie W, Ahmad I, Chen G, Zhu B. 2023. The occurrence, characteristics, and adaptation of A-to-I RNA editing in bacteria: A review. Front Microbiol. 14, 143929. (doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1143929) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zundel MA, Basturea GN, Deutscher MP. 2009. Initiation of ribosome degradation during starvation in Escherichia coli. RNA 15, 977–983. (doi: 10.1261/rna.1381309) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cherlin T, Magee R, Jing Y, Pliatsika V, Loher P, Rigoutsos I. 2020. Ribosomal RNA fragmentation into short RNAs (rRFs) is modulated in a sex- and population of origin-specific manner. BMC Biol 18, 38. (doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-0763-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Suzuki T, Nakamura A, Kato K, Söll D, Tanaka I, Sheppard K, Yao M. 2015. Structure of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa transamidosome reveals unique aspects of bacterial tRNA-dependent asparagine biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112., 382–7. (doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423314112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Devarkar SC, Budding CR, Pathirage C, Kavoor A, Herbert C, Limbach PA, Musier-Forsyth K, Xiong Y. 2025. Structural basis for aminoacylation of cellular modified tRNALys3 by human lysyl-tRNA synthetase. Nucleic Acids Res 53, gkaf114. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jumper J et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589. (doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Iwasaki W, ichi Sekine S, Kuroishi C, Kuramitsu S, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S. 2006. Structural basis of the water-assisted asparagine recognition by Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. J Mol Biol 360, 329–42. (doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.068) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Crepin T, Peterson F, Haertlein M, Jensen D, Wang C, Cusack S, Kron M. 2011. A hybrid structural model of the complete Brugia malayi cytoplasmic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. J Mol Biol 405, 1056–69. (doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Xie SC et al. 2024. Reaction hijacking inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum asparagine tRNA synthetase. Nat Commun 15, 937. (doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45224-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Charron C, Roy H, Blaise M, Giegé R, Kern D. 2003. Non-discriminating and discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetases differ in the anticodon-binding domain. EMBO J 22, 1632–43. (doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg148) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sauter C, Lorber B, Cavarelli J, Moras D, Giegé R. 2000. The free yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase differs from the tRNA(Asp)-complexed enzyme by structural changes in the catalytic site, hinge region, and anticodon-binding domain. J Mol Biol 299, 1313–24. (doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3791) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Briand C, Poterszman A, Eiler S, Webster G, Thierry J-C, Moras D. 2000. An intermediate step in the recognition of tRNA Asp by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. J Mol Biol 299, 1051–1060. (doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3819) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Weinert LA, Welch JJ. 2017. Why might bacterial pathogens have small genomes? Trends Ecol Evol. 32, 936–947. (doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.09.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dos Santos PC. 2017. Fe-S assembly in Gram-positive bacteria. In Biochemistry, Biosynthesis and Human Diseases: Biochemistry, Biosynthesis, and Human Diseases, edited by Rouault Tracey, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, pp. 97–116. (doi: 10.1515/9783110479850-005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ellepola K, Huang X, Riley RP, Bitoun JP, Wen ZT. 2021. Streptococcus mutans lacking sufCDSUB Is viable, but displays major defects in growth, stress tolerance responses and biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 12, 671533. (doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.671533) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Redanz S, Treerat P, Mu R, Redanz U, Zou Z, Koley D, Merritt J, Kreth J. 2020. Pyruvate secretion by oral streptococci modulates hydrogen peroxide dependent antagonism. ISME J. 14, 1074–1088. (doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0592-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Huang X, Browngardt CM, Jiang M, Ahn SJ, Burne RA, Nascimento MM. 2018. Diversity in antagonistic interactions between commensal oral Streptococci and Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 52, 88–101. (doi: 10.1159/000479091) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jiang Q, Zhao Y, Shui Y, Zhou X, Cheng L, Ren B, Chen Z, Li M. 2021. Interactions between neutrophils and periodontal pathogens in late-onset periodontitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 11, 627328. (doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.627328) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sarr D, Tóth E, Gingerich A, Rada B. 2018. Antimicrobial actions of dual oxidases and lactoperoxidase. J Microbiol 56, 73–386. (doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-7545-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Dowling DP, Bruender NA, Young AP, McCarty RM, Bandarian V, Drennan CL. 2014. Radical SAM enzyme QueE defines a new minimal core fold and metal-dependent mechanism. Nature Chem Biol 10, 106–112. (doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1426) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.McCoy LS, Xie Y, Tor Y. 2011. Antibiotics that target protein synthesis. WIREs RNA 2, 209–232. (doi: 10.1002/wrna.60) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hill PJ et al. 2013. Selective inhibitors of bacterial t-RNA-(N1G37) methyltransferase (TrmD) that demonstrate novel ordering of the lid domain. J Med Chem 56, 7278–7288. (doi: 10.1021/jm400718n) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Suzuki T, Miyauchi K. 2010. Discovery and characterization of tRNAIle lysidine synthetase (TilS). FEBS Lett 584, 272–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Arigoni F et al. 1998. A genome-based approach for the identification of essential bacterial genes. Nat Biotechnol 16, 851–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Handford JI, Ize B, Buchanan G, Butland GP, Greenblatt J, Emili A, Palmer T. 2009. Conserved network of proteins essential for bacterial viability. J Bacteriol 191, 4732–4749. (doi: 10.1128/jb.00136-09) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Allali-Hassani A, Campbell TL, Ho A, Schertzer JW, Brown ED. 2004. Probing the active site of YjeE: a vital Escherichia coli protein of unknown function. Biochem J 384, 577–584. (doi: 10.1042/BJ20041082) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Campbell TL, Ederer CS, Allali-Hassani A, Brown ED. 2007. Isolation of the rstA gene as a multicopy suppressor of YjeE, an essential ATPase of unknown function in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189, 3318–21. (doi: 10.1128/JB.00131-06) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Allali-Hassani A, Campbell TL, Ho A, Schertzer JW, Brown ED. 2004. Probing the active site of YjeE: a vital Escherichia coli protein of unknown function. Biochem J 384, 577–584. (doi: 10.1042/BJ20041082) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Freiberg C, Wieland B, Spaltmann F, Ehlert K, Brötz H, Labischinski H. 2001. Identification of novel essential Escherichia coli genes conserved among pathogenic bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 3, 483–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Lerner CG et al. 2007. From bacterial genomes to novel antibacterial agents: discovery, characterization, and antibacterial activity of compounds that bind to HI0065 (YjeE) from Haemophilus influenzae. Chem Biol Drug Des 69, 395–404. (doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00521.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Clifton BE, Fariz MA, Uechi GI, Laurino P. 2021. Evolutionary repair reveals an unexpected role of the tRNA modification m1G37 in aminoacylation. Nucleic Acids Res 49, 12467–12485. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1067) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Sun J et al. 2025. tRNA modification profiling reveals epitranscriptome regulatory networks in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nucleic Acids Res 53, gkaf696. (doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf696) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Leavitt JS, Moore H, Santangelo TJ, Lowe TM. 2025. The landscape of tRNA modifications in Archaea. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Sep 9:2025.05.02.651894 (doi: 10.1101/2025.05.02.651894) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hardy L et al. 2025. The tRNA epitranscriptomic landscape and RNA modification enzymes in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet. 21, e1011937. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011937) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Jiang W et al. 2024. Spontaneous mutations and mutational responses to penicillin treatment in the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mar Life Sci Technol 6, 198–211. (doi: 10.1007/s42995-024-00220-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Zheng JJ, Perez AJ, Tsui HCT, Massidda O, Winkler ME. 2017. Absence of the KhpA and KhpB (JAG/EloR) RNA-binding proteins suppresses the requirement for PBP2b by overproduction of FtsA in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 106, 793–814. (doi: 10.1111/mmi.13847) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (2.2MB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (54.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.docx (1MB, docx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (27.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Raw LC-MS/MS data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069173. Raw AlkAnilineSeq and GLORI data are available at the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home) under the accession number PRJEB96333.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES