Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Aug 8;66(7):e474–e480. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14582

Cybersecurity and Data Protection Practices Among Australian Dermatologists

Nicole Kah Mun Yoong 1,2,3,, Xin Lin Wong 3,4, John Sullivan 4,5
PMCID: PMC12633693  PMID: 41263778

1. Introduction

Ongoing education, training and regular review of cybersecurity and data protection policies are essential in today's digital healthcare landscape. Dermatology is particularly vulnerable due to its reliance on high‐resolution clinical imaging, which often includes personally identifiable and clinically sensitive visual data.

We conducted an audit of cybersecurity and data protection practices of Australian dermatology fellows and trainees. Our electronic survey was constructed using the online survey platform SurveyMonkey and was made available for 1 week to fellows and trainees via an electronic link in the college newsletter. In addition to an electronic invitation submitted to fellows and trainees via the college website, attendees at the Australian College of Dermatologists Annual Scientific Meeting were encouraged to participate in the survey during the CPD session on the 13th of May 2024.

A total of 108 dermatology consultants and trainees completed the survey (Table 1). The results of the survey are shown in Tables 2 and 3.

TABLE 1.

Demographic of Respondents.

Participant characteristics Number of respondents (%)
Contractor in private dermatology setting 51 (47.2%)
Practice owner of principal in private dermatology setting 54 (50.0%)
Visiting Medical Officer (VMO) or staff specialist in the public health system 33 (30.6%)
Contractor in non‐for‐profit health system 11 (10.2%)
None of the above 1 (1.0%)
Others 4 (3.7%)

TABLE 2.

Workplace data protection practices.

Number (%)
Employment of data protection officer
Yes 34 (31.5%)
No 42 (38.9%)
Not aware that one was needed 7 (6.5%)
Unsure 25 (21.2%)
Patients consented to practices' privacy and data handling policy
Yes 61 (56.5%)
No 24 (22.2%)
Unsure
Use of electronic medical records (EMR) or paper‐based records
Paper‐based records 3 (2.8%)
EMR 71 (65.7%)
Mix of EMR and paper‐based records 34 (31.5%)
Location of data storage
On premises 12 (11.1%)
Cloud storage 23 (21.3%)
On premises and cloud 53 (49.1%)
On premises and off site (not cloud) 17 (15.7%)
Others/Not applicable 3 (2.8%)
Regular backup of EMR data
Yes 82 (75.9%)
No 5 (4.6%)
Do not know/Need to check 17 (15.7%)
Not applicable 4 (3.7%)
Procedures for assessing patient data
Paper‐based system with restricted access 3 (2.8%)
Paper‐based system that all employees can access 5 (4.6%)
EMR with individual login for each employee 93 (86.1%)
EMR and shared login for employees 6 (5.6%)
Not applicable 1 (1.0%)
Policy on use of personal devices for work purposes
Yes 34 (31.5%)
No 43 (39.8%)
Yes, but not enforced 6 (5.6%)
Don't know 24 (22.25)
Others 1 (1.0%)
Provision of cameras, clinical images and/or dedicated non‐personal smartphones for clinical photographic/dermatoscope images
Yes 73 (67.6%)
No 27 (25.0%)
Yes, but not convenient to utilise 8 (7.4%)
Personal smartphones for patient clinical images
Never use personal smartphone to take or review patient images 32 (29.6%)
Use personal smartphone for clinical work using appropriately encrypted applications and patient images/data are not stored on my phone 15 (13.9%)
Occasionally use personal smart phone to take or review patient images (photos stored on device or received by SMS) 56 (51.9%)
Regularly use personal device to assist/document patient encounters or provide/triage telehealth consultations 5 (4.6%)
Regular cybersecurity and data protection training for employees
Yes 12 (11.1%)
Yes, but not for a while 17 (15.7%)
No 60 (55.6%)
Do not know 19 (17.6%)
Prior or available data protection and cybersecurity training
Yes within 2 years 14 (13.0%)
Yes, but over 2 years ago 4 (3.7%)
No 85 (78.7%)
Do not know 5 (4.6%)
Education or enforcing strong password policies
Yes 45 (41.7%)
No 26 (24.1%)
Up to individuals 35 (32.4%)
Unsure 2 (1.9%)

TABLE 3.

Cybersecurity awareness of dermatology consultants or fellows.

Number of respondents (%)
Do you use a shared password for EMR
Yes 10 (9.3%)
No 97 (89.8%)
Unsure 1 (1.0%)
Does anyone else know your EMR password
Yes 25 (23.2%)
No 75 (69.4%)
Unsure 8 (7.4%)
The last time you changed or asked to change EMR password
More than 2 years ago 27 (25.0%)
More than 1 year ago 29 (26.9%)
Within last 6 months 17 (15.7%)
Within last 3 months 15 (13.9%)
Never 20 (18.5%)
EMR remote access
Yes 91 (84.3%)
Yes, but have not used it 3 (2.8%)
No 14 (13.0%)
VPN and/or two factor authentication for remote access to EMR
Yes 69 (67.6%)
No 17 (16.7%)
Unsure 16 (16.0%)
*6 respondents had skipped this question
Email filters and anti‐phishing tools at workplace
Yes 58 (53.7%)
Have been offered but do not use them 2 (1.9%)
No 17 (15.7%)
Use personal email on work computer 20 (18.5%)
Do not use emails at work 13 (12.0%)
Confidence in recognising phishing emails
Yes 25 (23.2%)
Somewhat confident 63 (58.3%)
Low confidence 17 (15.7%)
Do not know what a phishing email is 1 (0.9%)
Unsure 2 (1.9%)
Do you ask colleagues regarding management of difficult cases or diagnostic dilemma
Yes 93 (86.1%)
No 15 (13.9%)
If yes, modality is used for image transfer
iMessage 13 (15.9%)
WhatsApp 37 (45.1%)
Official government health email 7 (8.5%)
Regular email 25 (30.5%)
*26 respondents skipped this question
Where are photos stored
Electronic medical records 26 (28.3%)
Work computer 19 (20.7%)
Phone/Tablet 18 (19.6%)
Cloud server 15 (16.3%)
Camera 2 (2.2%)
Hard drive 1 (1.1%)
Deleted after discussion 9 (9.8%)
No photos taken 2 (2.2%)
*32 respondents skipped this question
Telehealth consultations
Yes 57 (52.8%)
No 16 (14.8%)
Sometimes 18 (16.7%)
Rarely 17 (15.7%)
Type of telehealth consultation
Audio 45 (42.9%)
Teleconferencing 12 (11.4%)
Audio and teleconferencing 35 (33.3%)
Not applicable 12 (12.4%)
*3 respondents skipped this question
Telehealth platforms
WhatsApp on work phone 6 (5.7%)
Facetime on work phone 20 (19.1%)
Secure teleconferencing platform on work computer 37 (35.2%)
Not applicable 42 (40.0%)
*3 respondents skipped this question
Photographs sent by patients prior to telehealth consultations
Always/most of the time 43 (40.6%)
Sometimes 32 (30.2%)
Rarely 9 (8.5%)
No 22 (20.8%)
*2 respondents skipped this question
Receiving photographs from telehealth patients
Via work email 25 (23.6%)
Via work phone 1 (0.9%)
Via practice reception email 56 (52.8%)
Not applicable 24 (22.6%)
*2 respondents skipped this question
Opt in to receive phishing scam exercise via email
Yes 80 (74.1%)
No 28 (25.9%)

Note: The * at the bottom of several questions are indicative for the respective questions where respondents had skipped the question and not answered. 

2. Discussion

The digital transformation of healthcare businesses has led to increasing vulnerabilities to cyber threats. Cybersecurity incidents can have serious repercussions, including medicolegal consequences, reputational damage and financial losses [1].

Our survey shows a substantial gap in the employment of a data protection officer and awareness of patient consenting policies, which points towards an area of improvement. Although most participants utilise electronic medical records (EMR) for documentation of patients' data, some participants only use paper‐based records or a combination of both. Reassuringly, the majority of participants reported using systems that include regular either onsite, offsite or cloud‐based backups of their EMRs and secure access via unique user credentials.

There is a disparity in cybersecurity awareness and education among dermatology fellows and trainees, particularly in cybersecurity training and the use of personal devices for reviewing clinical images. Telehealth is widely adopted, with variations in the use of secure teleconferencing platforms and telehealth practices, with less than half of the respondents using secure platforms on work computers. This places practitioners at risk, as studies have demonstrated inadequate data protection and weak or absent passwords as major contributors to data breaches [1].

Healthcare providers may communicate electronically if reasonable safeguards are in place, consistent with the Code of Conduct for Doctors and privacy law [2]. Under Australian Privacy Principle 11, health information must be protected from misuse, loss, or unauthorised access. Failure to take reasonable steps may constitute a privacy breach with legal consequences [3]. Informed consent must be obtained from patients prior to telehealth appointments and when collecting or disclosing any medical information [3]. Secure platforms with features such as end‐to‐end encryption, MFA for hosts, and access controls using meeting ID, passwords, and secure meeting links are recommended [4].

Recommendations include the use of passphrases—a series of unrelated words with numbers or special characters [5]. Multi‐factor authentication (MFA) provides additional protection against unauthorised access. This involves a username or passphrase; a unique code obtained from a token, text message, or smartphone application; and a characteristic unique to the user, like a fingerprint or facial scan [4]. Regular software updates, installing anti‐virus software, and ad‐blocking browser plugins on work computers can ensure network and device security [5]. Frequent backup of patient data can prevent losing information in the event of a security breach. A data breach response plan should also be formulated in preparation for these security breaches [6]. General data protection practices should be implemented at an organisational level. These include implementing role‐based access controls with individual logins, as well as security audits to identify and address potential threats [7].

Our survey identified several critical areas for improvement in cybersecurity practices within dermatology settings. These include a clear need for more regular cybersecurity training, both for dermatologists and their team members. Inconsistent practices and knowledge around password protection have led to many participants not routinely reviewing password security measures. Approximately one‐third of respondents were either unaware of the security features associated with their remote EMR access, or were using access methods that do not meet recommended security standards. There is a significant gap in training related to phishing awareness, highlighting the need for ongoing education to help clinicians and staff identify and manage suspicious communications. These findings underscore the importance of proactive, structured cybersecurity protocols and ongoing education to safeguard sensitive clinical data.

3. Conclusion

Cybersecurity and data protection awareness in healthcare is paramount to maintain the confidentiality of patients. Our audit shows a disparity in current cybersecurity and data protection practices among dermatologists and dermatology trainees; hence, further education and training is needed in this digital space.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Australasian College of Dermatology for their support in organising the Continuous Professional Development activity. The authors would also like to acknowledge MIGA for medico‐legal advice. Open access publishing facilitated by University of New South Wales, as part of the Wiley ‐ University of New South Wales agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from The Australasian Journal of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES