Abstract
Background
The global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), major contributors to stroke and heart failure, has substantially increased since 1990 due to aging populations and improved chronic disease survival. This study analyzed global, regional, and national trends in AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) among those aged ≥ 65 years (1990–2021), stratified by age, sex, and socioeconomic development index (SDI).
Methods
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 dataset provided data on AF/AFL. The analysis included age standardization, average annual percentage change (AAPC) calculations, frontier analysis, and decomposition analysis to quantify the contributions of demographic and epidemiological changes.
Results
Global AF/AFL cases in those aged ≥ 65 years increased significantly (1990–2021), with a 203.91% increase in deaths. However, age-standardized rates varied; high-income North America showed the highest prevalence rate in 2021 at 11,815.10 per 100,000. Decomposition analysis showed that the increase was attributable to population aging and growth. Frontier analysis revealed countries with disproportionately high DALYs relative to their SDI.
Conclusions
The escalating global burden of AF/AFL in older adults demands targeted interventions and resource allocation to address regional disparities. While demographic changes are primary drivers, further research is crucial to understand the contribution of epidemiological factors and develop effective prevention and management strategies.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-025-05284-5.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Atrial flutter, Older adults, Epidemiology, Disease burden
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common intractable arrhythmias in clinical practice and serve as significant triggers for ischemic stroke and heart failure [1, 2]. Over the past two decades, the disease burden related to AF/AFL has notably increased due to population aging, lifestyle changes, prolonged survival of patients with chronic illnesses, and the accumulation of risk factors [3, 4]. This rise has led to a distinct clustering trend among the elderly. Recent research indicates an enhanced life expectancy for a growing population of older adults with AF/AFL, alongside advancements in the management of AF/AFL and its complications [5, 6]. However, guidelines tailored to the clinical practice and management of AF/AFL in older adults remain inadequate and require further refinement.
The diagnosis of paroxysmal AF relies heavily on capturing AF episodes through electrocardiogram (ECG), resulting in a low detection rate from a single ECG [7, 8]. Additionally, many AF patients exhibit non-specific or mild symptoms, or they may lack awareness of the disease, contributing to low disease awareness among this population [9–11]. Research shows a 33% increase in the prevalence of AF/AFL over the last two decades [12]. With the global population aging and improved survival rates from chronic illnesses, the incidence and prevalence of AF/AFL are projected to rise over the next 30 years. This presents an opportunity to potentially save millions of lives in the coming decade. Current evidence indicates that the prevalence of AF/AFL among older adults significantly increases with rising life expectancy [5]. Therefore, understanding both the epidemiology and clinical complexities, such as comorbidities and frailty, in older AF/AFL patients (aged ≥ 65 years) is crucial for effective management.
We analyzed the global burden of disease data from 1990 to 2021 to delineate the prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) status of AF/AFL among older adults aged ≥ 65 years on a global, regional, and national scale. This analysis was stratified by social development level, age, and sex to identify key demographic and epidemiological drivers of the changing burden and their relationship to national health and economic indicators. Specifically, we aimed to determine the trends in AF/AFL burden globally and regionally, identify disparities based on socioeconomic status, and quantify the contributions of demographic changes and epidemiological shifts to the observed trends.
Methods
Study population and data collection
The Global Burden of Disease, Injury, and Risk Factor Study (GBD) is one of the most comprehensive scientific investigations evaluating global health levels and trends. It provides evaluations of 371 diseases, injuries, and disabilities, along with 88 risk factors, across 204 nations and territories [13–15]. In this study, we extracted data on the prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and DALYs of AF/AFL, including their respective 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs), stratified by sex, age, region, and country, from the GBD 2021 dataset for individuals aged ≥ 65 years (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/). The study population consists of individuals aged over 65 with AF/AFL, and specific methodological details can be found in earlier studies.
We utilized DisMod-MR 2.1 and spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression modeling to generate initial estimates of prevalence, incidence, and exposure to risk factors, adjusting for variations in measurement methods and case definitions. We employed ICD-coded vital registration data or household mortality surveys to estimate mortality rates, applying suitable statistical methods to enhance comparability [16]. DALYs serve as a metric for the burden of disease, comprising two components: years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs) [17]. Comorbidity adjustments were implemented using microsimulation of 40,000 individuals across different age groups, sexes, countries, and years, based on independent probabilities of prevalence and exposure to conditions such as heart failure, stroke, and diabetes. This standard GBD approach allows consistency across causes and locations, although it does not fully capture the interactive effects of multiple comorbidities on AF/AFL outcomes. The potential implications of this limitation are further discussed in the Discussion.
For this study, AF/AFL data were gathered from 21 districts in geographically proximate and epidemiologically similar countries, encompassing seven age groups (65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, 90–94, ≥ 95 years) for both males and females. Additionally, we computed the socio-demographic index (SDI) for each country, serving as a composite indicator of the social and economic circumstances reflecting health outcomes [15]. These indices can be classified into five categories: low, low-middle, middle, high-middle, and high. Age standardization was conducted using the direct method based on the global age structure in 2021, and the 95% UIs were calculated using the ‘ageadjust.direct’ function in the R package ‘epitools‘ [18].
Data processing and disease model
A descriptive analysis was performed to assess the burden of AF/AFL in individuals aged 65 years and above on a global scale. We compared the age-standardized prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs for AF/AFL across various age groups, genders, regions, and countries, expressed per 100,000 population. Additionally, we estimated the average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) using link-point regression models to assess temporal trends [19].
We also employed Das Gupta’s decomposition method to analyze AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs in the context of aging, population growth, and epidemiological shifts [20–22]. The formulas are as follows:
Prevalence ay, py, ey =
Here, Ay, py, and ey represent prevalence rates corresponding to aging, population growth, and year-specific prevalence, respectively. Additionally, a.i, y denotes the proportion of the population in a specific age group for year y. py signifies the total population in year y, and ei,y signifies the prevalence rate within a particular age group in year y. The prevalence rate reflects the distribution across the seven age groups. The impact of each factor on the change in prevalence from 1990 to 2021 is assessed by altering one factor while holding the others constant, with gender further elucidated by breaking it down into subgroups.
We utilized the ‘geom_smooth’ function from the ‘ggplot2’ package to model the correlation between the SDI and disease burden among individuals aged 65 years and older across 204 countries and territories. Subsequently, we employed frontier analysis, a quantitative analytical approach, to establish the minimum achievable age-standardized prevalence, morbidity, DALYs, and mortality rates based on the SDI [23]. This analysis aimed to evaluate the association between the burden of AF/AFL and socio-demographic development.
In studying health inequalities, the Slope Index and the Concentration Index are commonly used methods to quantify and visualize health disparities between various groups [24]. The Slope Index quantifies the magnitude of health inequalities by categorizing populations based on socio-economic status, computing the average health status of each group, and determining the slope of the regression line according to the socio-economic hierarchy. In contrast, the Concentration Index captures the distribution and extent of health status inequality across the population by examining the area between the concentration curve and the line of equality. Both approaches not only uncover health disparities but also provide precise quantitative measures of health inequalities among diverse groups.
R version 4.4.0 was used for data analysis, with statistical significance set at a two-sided P-value below 0.05. These analytical approaches and tools were selected to uphold the reliability and scientific validity of the study findings.
Results
Global level
Globally, the prevalence of AF/AFL in individuals aged ≥ 65 years increased substantially between 1990 and 2021, rising from 15,797.76 thousand to 38,959.43 thousand (a 146.61% increase) (Table 1). However, the age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) decreased slightly by 0.59%, from 5,285.30 to 5,254.21 per 100,000, with an average annual decline of 0.02% (Table 1). This apparent discrepancy reflects the increasing proportion of the population aged ≥ 65 years; the proportion of elderly patients with AF/AFL among all AF/AFL cases rose from 71% in 1990 to 74% in 2021(Supplementary Figure S1).
Table 1.
Cases and age-standardized rates of AF/AFL among individuals aged ≥ 65 years at the global and regional levels in 2021, and the AAPCs from 1990 to 2021
| Characteristics | Prevalence (95% UI) |
Incidence (95% UI) |
Deaths (95% UI) |
DALYs (95% UI) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counts (no.×103) (2021) | ASR (2021) | AAPCs | Counts (no.×103) (2021) | ASR (2021) | AAPCs | Counts (no.×103) (2021) | ASR (2021) | AAPCs | Counts (no.×103) (2021) | ASR (2021) | AAPCs | |
| Global | 38959.43 (31166.85 to 47108.5) | 5254.21 (5252.55 to 5255.86) | −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.00) | 2885.69 (2121.35 to 3713.4) | 427.09 (424.98 to 429.21) | −0.13 (−0.19 to −0.07) | 322.25 (287.05 to 356.76) | 47.03 (46.87 to 47.19) | 0.12 (0.04 to 0.19) | 6703.66 (5700.84 to 7872.55) | 930.95 (930.25 to 931.66) | 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.06) |
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Males | 19688.97 (15694.94 to 23491.54) | 6083.49 (6080.75 to 6086.24) | −0.04 (−0.05 to −0.02) | 1355.76 (983.77 to 1742.3) | 426.03 (422.21 to 429.88) | −0.31 (−0.35 to −0.26) | 125.28 (114.83 to 137.55) | 47.56 (47.29 to 47.83) | 0.19 (0.11 to 0.27) | 3048.27 (2558.67 to 3554.73) | 1007.36 (1006.19 to 1008.52) | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.1) |
| Females | 19270.46 (15358.77 to 23393.85) | 4605.5 (4603.44 to 4607.56) | −0.07 (−0.09 to −0.05) | 1529.93 (1103.78 to 1953.28) | 420.13 (417.61 to 422.67) | −0.08 (−0.13 to −0.03) | 196.97 (170.38 to 227.97) | 46.57 (46.36 to 46.77) | 0.06 (−0.04 to 0.16) | 3655.39 (3081.33 to 4257.62) | 870.17 (869.28 to 871.07) | −0.05 (−0.14 to 0.04) |
| Socio-demographic index | ||||||||||||
| Low | 1286.1 (948.98 to 1621.82) | 5282.08 (5212.09 to 5352.97) | 0.16 (0.12 to 0.19) | 111.33 (72.68 to 146.83) | 457.54 (437.01 to 478.99) | 0.06 (0.03 to 0.09) | 9.45 (6.77 to 12.25) | 39.91 (39.01 to 40.82) | 0.74 (0.43 to 1.04) | 227.84 (171.64 to 278.56) | 779.47 (775.93 to 783.03) | 0.47 (0.26 to 0.69) |
| Low-middle | 4913 (3616.56 to 6293.32) | 6715.8 (6682.51 to 6749.25) | 0.18 (0.16 to 0.2) | 424.27 (284.94 to 567.87) | 550.79 (541.47 to 560.26) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.06) | 35.88 (29.92 to 42.19) | 43.65 (43.18 to 44.12) | 0.94 (0.65 to 1.23) | 834.31 (681.98 to 982.81) | 871.79 (869.84 to 873.74) | 0.61 (0.38 to 0.84) |
| Middle | 10115.23 (7699.21 to 12673.6) | 7118.34 (7095.28 to 7141.46) | 0.27 (0.2 to 0.33) | 802.28 (541.85 to 1084.64) | 558.52 (552.11 to 565.01) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.08) | 78.66 (67.89 to 90.52) | 46 (45.67 to 46.33) | 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.24) | 1711.37 (1424.12 to 2019.05) | 877.37 (876.02 to 878.72) | 0.08 (−0.06 to 0.22) |
| High-middle | 8464.6 (6604.19 to 10348.03) | 6363.24 (6342.95 to 6383.58) | 0.02 (−0.06 to 0.1) | 588.7 (402.23 to 771.96) | 378.73 (374.23 to 383.29) | −0.08 (−0.11 to −0.05) | 76.04 (65.96 to 86.05) | 46.56 (46.23 to 46.9) | 0.05 (−0.18 to 0.28) | 1518.31 (1279.89 to 1770.24) | 883.66 (882.25 to 885.08) | −0.06 (−0.24 to 0.12) |
| High | 14140.43 (12040.37 to 16218.04) | 7971.38 (7957.69 to 7985.09) | −0.29 (−0.32 to −0.26) | 956.31 (774.12 to 1143.76) | 422.45 (420.08 to 424.84) | −0.27 (−0.32 to −0.22) | 121.87 (104.24 to 139.96) | 50.05 (49.76 to 50.33) | −0.04 (−0.09 to 0) | 2404.64 (2018.94 to 2792.39) | 1075.3 (1073.93 to 1076.67) | −0.04 (−0.1 to 0.03) |
| Region | ||||||||||||
| Central Asia | 251.19 (187.65 to 305.93) | 4505.88 (4487.83 to 4523.99) | 0.16 (0.14 to 0.18) | 17.96 (12.27 to 24.42) | 310.92 (289.15 to 334.71) | −0.08 (−0.1 to −0.06) | 1.22 (1.1 to 1.34) | 24.9 (23.5 to 26.38) | 0.76 (0.24 to 1.28) | 35.72 (28.4 to 42.46) | 661.53 (654.52 to 668.61) | 0.44 (0.08 to 0.81) |
| Central Europe | 1296.34 (1020.01 to 1555.41) | 6133.74 (6089.36 to 6178.48) | 0.32 (0.25 to 0.38) | 84.41 (63 to 105.96) | 333.74 (325.96 to 341.82) | 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.03) | 10.66 (9.7 to 11.63) | 48.53 (47.61 to 49.47) | −0.36 (−0.52 to −0.21) | 228.72 (196.31 to 260.7) | 1031.84 (1027.61 to 1036.08) | −0.09 (−0.17 to −0.01) |
| Eastern Europe | 1680.4 (1261.52 to 2093.7) | 5484.47 (5446.13 to 5523.11) | 0.34 (0.33 to 0.36) | 100.54 (67.2 to 132.27) | 294.27 (286.5 to 302.32) | 0.14 (0.1 to 0.17) | 14.81 (13.42 to 16.26) | 45.96 (45.21 to 46.72) | 0.37 (−0.06 to 0.8) | 308.68 (258.05 to 358.29) | 944.47 (941.08 to 947.87) | 0.4 (0.19 to 0.61) |
| Australasia | 403.28 (308.61 to 504.01) | 9379.15 (9277.12 to 9482.3) | 0.14 (0.12 to 0.16) | 26.52 (18.17 to 35.31) | 473.22 (455.5 to 491.86) | −0.36 (−0.41 to −0.31) | 4.24 (3.62 to 4.8) | 71.58 (69.42 to 73.78) | −0.18 (−0.37 to 0) | 75.8 (63.33 to 87.09) | 1354.87 (1345.19 to 1364.61) | −0.12 (−0.2 to −0.04) |
| High-income Asia Pacific | 1685.13 (1240.64 to 2126.75) | 3338.72 (3333.51 to 3343.93) | −0.58 (−0.62 to −0.53) | 107.47 (71.42 to 143.85) | 261.3 (257.14 to 265.53) | −0.99 (−1.06 to −0.92) | 16.66 (13.87 to 19.61) | 26.03 (25.62 to 26.44) | −0.66 (−1 to −0.32) | 310.72 (256.54 to 366.44) | 566.1 (564.04 to 568.18) | −0.69 (−0.92 to −0.46) |
| High-income North America | 5911.16 (5385.59 to 6451.09) | 11815.1 (11781.87 to 11848.41) | 0.39 (0.38 to 0.41) | 434.46 (375.31 to 493.12) | 557.52 (553.02 to 562.08) | 0.04 (0.01 to 0.08) | 37.36 (32.1 to 42.68) | 54.63 (54.07 to 55.19) | 0.86 (0.7 to 1.01) | 865.45 (740.28 to 993.85) | 1319 (1316.21 to 1321.79) | 0.62 (0.58 to 0.66) |
| Western Europe | 6985.4 (5637.84 to 8309.21) | 8447.56 (8425.96 to 8469.22) | −0.08 (−0.09 to −0.06) | 436.48 (333.42 to 559.63) | 401.04 (397.98 to 404.14) | −0.42 (−0.45 to −0.38) | 70.83 (60.98 to 81.26) | 60.08 (59.63 to 60.53) | 0.1 (−0.07 to 0.27) | 1281.11 (1071.79 to 1481.9) | 1213.3 (1211.16 to 1215.45) | 0.02 (−0.07 to 0.11) |
| Andean Latin America | 268.75 (196.73 to 339.03) | 7440.38 (7329.78 to 7552.57) | 0.38 (0.36 to 0.4) | 20.54 (13.66 to 27.42) | 522.99 (495.35 to 552.17) | −0.03 (−0.04 to −0.02) | 1.95 (1.59 to 2.29) | 40.55 (38.77 to 42.4) | −0.58 (−1.01 to −0.14) | 43.83 (35.83 to 51.6) | 896.15 (887.78 to 904.59) | −0.23 (−0.47 to 0.02) |
| Caribbean | 273.93 (200.32 to 345.5) | 7730.73 (7638.79 to 7823.73) | 0.2 (0.18 to 0.22) | 20.71 (14.04 to 27.27) | 540.11 (517.22 to 564.02) | −0.13 (−0.14 to −0.12) | 2.58 (2.28 to 2.89) | 51.65 (49.66 to 53.7) | −0.43 (−0.72 to −0.14) | 50.43 (41.67 to 58.85) | 1037.43 (1028.35 to 1046.57) | −0.23 (−0.38 to −0.08) |
| Central Latin America | 1232.88 (919.22 to 1563.43) | 8030.41 (7979.63 to 8081.49) | 0.1 (0.07 to 0.13) | 95.78 (64.85 to 128.34) | 578.84 (565.84 to 592.13) | −0.06 (−0.08 to −0.04) | 9.68 (8.51 to 10.85) | 48.48 (47.52 to 49.46) | −0.25 (−0.55 to 0.06) | 208.52 (170.56 to 244.54) | 1023.64 (1019.24 to 1028.06) | −0.09 (−0.24 to 0.07) |
| Southern Latin America | 263.66 (211.06 to 315.16) | 4123.79 (4062.15 to 4186.34) | −0.75 (−0.84 to −0.66) | 19.13 (13.62 to 24.51) | 259.25 (245.5 to 273.84) | −1.21 (−1.3 to −1.13) | 3.18 (2.82 to 3.55) | 38.11 (36.79 to 39.45) | 0 (−0.33 to 0.33) | 57 (49.47 to 64.76) | 689.52 (683.87 to 695.21) | −0.55 (−1.1 to 0) |
| Tropical Latin America | 1382.51 (1017.39 to 1727.1) | 8392.58 (8340.55 to 8444.92) | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0) | 102.8 (68.17 to 136.92) | 620.76 (606.8 to 635.03) | −0.1 (−0.16 to −0.05) | 10.8 (9.36 to 12.19) | 51.66 (50.69 to 52.65) | −0.1 (−0.33 to 0.13) | 228.96 (190.33 to 269.58) | 1071.78 (1067.39 to 1076.19) | −0.06 (−0.17 to 0.05) |
| North Africa and Middle East | 988.96 (751.13 to 1222.22) | 4810.06 (4759.93 to 4860.68) | 0.32 (0.28 to 0.36) | 91.55 (64.83 to 119.63) | 360.7 (348.19 to 373.67) | −0.13 (−0.16 to −0.1) | 10.33 (8.83 to 11.76) | 42.42 (41.58 to 43.27) | 0.47 (0.19 to 0.74) | 202.04 (169.49 to 233.94) | 729.98 (726.69 to 733.28) | 0.31 (0.16 to 0.45) |
| South Asia | 5067.72 (3662.18 to 6498.47) | 6624.15 (6585.69 to 6662.83) | 0.07 (0.05 to 0.09) | 453.12 (297.55 to 599.34) | 566.69 (555.66 to 577.93) | 0.06 (0.05 to 0.07) | 32.94 (25.07 to 41.15) | 39.32 (38.86 to 39.77) | 1.53 (1.02 to 2.05) | 818.27 (630.27 to 987.21) | 823.03 (821.14 to 824.93) | 0.8 (0.52 to 1.08) |
| East Asia | 7611.6 (5678.87 to 9389.46) | 4130.91 (4127.88 to 4133.94) | 0.29 (0.13 to 0.46) | 574.51 (394.08 to 768.17) | 566.74 (558.38 to 575.21) | −0.31 (−0.44 to −0.18) | 64.82 (52.62 to 77.38) | 47.09 (46.71 to 47.47) | −0.43 (−0.73 to −0.12) | 1334.49 (1094.2 to 1555.47) | 818.62 (817.17 to 820.08) | −0.21 (−0.47 to 0.05) |
| Oceania | 19.84 (14.68 to 24.53) | 4813.23 (4740.58 to 4887.01) | 0.12 (0.11 to 0.14) | 1.66 (1.10 to 2.21) | 574.69 (417.57 to 784.41) | −0.16 (−0.17 to −0.15) | 0.13 (0.1 to 0.17) | 42.71 (35.18 to 51.63) | −0.17 (−0.29 to −0.05) | 3.47 (2.75 to 4.17) | 899.76 (867.18 to 933.54) | −0.03 (−0.09 to 0.03) |
| Southeast Asia | 2524.51 (1873.02 to 3205.04) | 7917.46 (7867.36 to 7967.86) | 0.20 (0.19 to 0.21) | 206.55 (138.7 to 289.53) | 441.20 (439.24 to 443.16) | 0.00 (−0.01 to 0.02) | 20.72 (17.51 to 23.9) | 57.01 (56.22 to 57.81) | 0.72 (0.64 to 0.8) | 442.28 (365.69 to 513) | 1058.02 (1054.81 to 1061.24) | 0.43 (0.39 to 0.48) |
| Central Sub-Saharan Africa | 105.64 (81.24 to 132.31) | 4790.26 (4560.22 to 5031.51) | 0.06 (0.06 to 0.07) | 9.19 (6.06 to 12.51) | 420.83 (353.83 to 499.75) | −0.04 (−0.05 to −0.03) | 1.08 (0.67 to 1.48) | 49.04 (45.8 to 52.54) | 0.45 (0.37 to 0.54) | 24.14 (17.57 to 30.78) | 898.4 (885.71 to 911.32) | 0.28 (0.24 to 0.33) |
| Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa | 380.88 (281.95 to 470.7) | 4819.33 (4710.52 to 4930.58) | 0.32 (0.28 to 0.36) | 30.01 (20.07 to 39.96) | 409.16 (376.9 to 444.01) | 0.19 (0.15 to 0.23) | 2.74 (1.62 to 3.87) | 34.62 (33.22 to 36.08) | 0.15 (0.06 to 0.23) | 67.27 (49.28 to 87.19) | 701.9 (696.15 to 707.69) | 0.18 (0.11 to 0.25) |
| Southern Sub-Saharan Africa | 175.98 (125.16 to 221.87) | 5961.43 (5743.7 to 6187.05) | 0 (−0.01 to 0.01) | 14.9 (9.38 to 19.62) | 513.03 (450.11 to 584.22) | −0.01 (−0.02 to 0) | 1.24 (1.09 to 1.38) | 42.2 (39.66 to 44.93) | 1.2 (0.87 to 1.53) | 29.05 (24.14 to 34) | 810.23 (800.14 to 820.49) | 0.68 (0.48 to 0.88) |
| Western Sub Saharan Africa | 449.66 (333.4 to 567.56) | 4991.99 (4902.44 to 5083.12) | 0.39 (0.38 to 0.39) | 37.41 (24.33 to 50.75) | 424.39 (398.29 to 452.11) | 0.26 (0.25 to 0.27) | 4.28 (3.62 to 4.95) | 48.96 (47.42 to 50.55) | −0.02 (−0.11 to 0.06) | 87.71 (71.85 to 104.06) | 830.19 (824.34 to 836.08) | 0.07 (0.01 to 0.13) |
AAPC Average annual percent change, AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ASR Age-standardized rate, DALYs Disability-adjusted life-years, UI Uncertainty interval
Globally, the number of incident AF/AFL cases increased from 1,231.97 thousand in 1990 to 2,885.69 thousand in 2021 (a 134.23% increase) (Table 1). Despite this rise in case numbers, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) decreased from 446.09 to 427.09 per 100,000 population due to demographic changes (Table 1). In summary, the number of incident AF/AFL cases increased, while the age-standardized incidence rate showed a decreasing trend (AAPC = −0.13%; 95% CI = −0.19%, −0.07%) (Table 1).
AF/AFL mortality increased significantly from 106.03 thousand cases in 1990 to 322.25 thousand in 2021 (a 203.91% increase) (Table 1). Consistently, the age-standardized death rate (ASDR) also rose, from 45.56 to 47.03 per 100,000 population (Table 1). Overall, AF/AFL mortality showed an increasing trend (AAPC = 0.11%; 95% CI = 0.04%, 0.19%) (Table 1).
The number of AF/AFL DALYs increased from 2,555.22 thousand in 1990 to 6,703.66 thousand in 2021 (Table 1). The age-standardized rate (ASR) for AF/AFL DALYs in 2021 was 930.95 per 100,000 globally (Table 1). However, the trend in DALYs among those aged 65 years and older was not statistically significant compared to morbidity and mortality rates over the same period.
Regional and national levels
From 1990 to 2021, the ASPR of AF/AFL in older people increased most rapidly in high-income North America (AAPC 0.39%) and decreased most rapidly in Southern Latin America (AAPC − 0.75%) (Table 1). In 2021, high-income North America (11,815.10 per 100,000), Australasia (9,379.15 per 100,000), and Western Europe (8447.56 per 100,000) had the highest ASPR among those aged 65 years and older. Tropical Latin America had the highest ASIR at 620.76 per 100,000 (Fig. 1E-F; Table 1). While regions like the High-income Asia Pacific experienced varying degrees of decline in AF/AFL deaths and DALYs, South Asia saw substantial increases in both (Fig. 1G-H; Table 1). In 2021, Australiasia had the highest rates of AF/AFL deaths and DALYs among older people, while Central Asia and High-income Asia Pacific had the lowest (Fig. 1G-H; Table 1).
Fig. 1.
Distribution of AF/AFL disease burden globally, in territories with varying SDIs and across 21 GBD regions in 1990 and 2021. (A) Prevalent cases, (B) Incident cases, (C) Death cases, (D) DALYs, (E) Age-standardized prevalence rates, (F) Age-standardized incidence rates, (G) Age-standardized deaths rates, (H) Age-standardized DALY rates. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life-years, SDI Socio-demographic indices
At the national level, Sweden had the highest ASPR of AF/AFL in 2021 (13,521.89), while China had the highest number of cases (7,302.19 thousand) (Supplementary Fig. S2A, Supplementary Table S1). Between 1990 and 2021, Austria showed the largest increase in ASPR among those aged ≥ 65 years (AAPC 2.24%), followed by Sweden (AAPC 1.53%) and Czechia (AAPC 1.43%) (Fig. 2A). Seven countries (Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Djibouti, Bahrain, and Guam) experienced prevalence increases exceeding 400% (Fig. 3A). In 2021, China and the United States had the highest morbidity, with 550.83 thousand and 392.14 thousand cases, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2B, Supplementary Table S1). Qatar (718.89%) and Jordan (536.89%) showed the most substantial increases in morbidity since 1990, while Niue showed a decrease (−14.13%) (Fig. 3B). China (62.03 thousand) and Montenegro (185.71) had the highest number of deaths and the highest ASDR, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2C, Supplementary Table S1). Most countries experienced increases in deaths, with the largest increases observed in Maldives (684.34%), Kuwait (665.53%), and Bhutan (642.59%) (Fig. 3C). Austria and Sweden showed the most rapid increases in age-standardized morbidity and mortality rates, respectively (Fig. 2B-C). Guam experienced the most substantial reduction in age-standardized DALYs (AAPC − 2.12%), followed by Cyprus (AAPC − 1.59%), while Sweden showed the most significant increase (AAPC 1.54%) (Fig. 2D). Montenegro had the highest rate of AF/AFL DALYs among the elderly, while China had the highest number of DALYs in 2021 (2,577.77 and 1,279.89 thousand, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. S2D, Supplementary Table S1). DALYs in Kuwait increased by over 500% between 1990 and 2021 (Fig. 3D).
Fig. 2.

Map showing AAPCs in AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs among individuals aged ≥ 65 years (1990–2021). (A) Prevalence; (B) Incidence; (C) Deaths; (D) DALYs. AAPC Average annual percentage change, AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life years
Fig. 3.
Map showing percentage changes in AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs among individuals aged ≥ 65 years (1990–2021). (A) Prevalence; (B) Incidence; (C) Deaths; (D) DALYs. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life-years
Age and sex patterns
Globally, the ASPR of AF/AFL decreased among individuals aged ≥ 65 years between 1990 and 2021 (from 6149.18 to 6083.49 for men and from 4693.46 to 4605.5 for women) (Fig. 4J; Table 1). The decline was more gradual in men (AAPC − 0.04%) than in women (AAPC − 0.07%) (Table 1). Similarly, the ASIR decreased in both sexes, with a less pronounced decrease in women (AAPC − 0.31% vs. −0.08%) (Fig. 4J; Table 1). However, mortality rates increased for both men and women, more rapidly in men (AAPC 0.19% vs. 0.06%) (Fig. 4J; Table 1). The ASR of DALYs increased for men but decreased for women. YLLs and YLDs followed similar trends to mortality and DALYs (Fig. 4J; Table 1). In addition, the number of morbidities, deaths, and DALYs in females exceeded those in males (Fig. 4I; Table 1). Despite variations in socio-demographic factors, males consistently showed higher standardized rates than females, suggesting a potentially greater disease burden for males, particularly in countries with low to middle SDI.
Fig. 4.
Age- and sex-structured analysis of AF/AFL disease burden in 1990 and 2021. (A) Prevalent cases, (B) Incident cases, (C) Deaths cases, (D) DALYs, (E) Age-standardized prevalence rates, (F) Age-standardized incidence rates, (G) Age-standardized death rates, (H) Age-standardized DALY rates, (I) Cases, (J) Age-standardized rates. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life years, YLDs Years lived with disability, YLLs Years of life lost
Globally, the prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and DALYs of AF/AFL at least doubled in each age subgroup of individuals aged ≥ 65 years between 1990 and 2021 (Fig. 4A-D). This trend showed a clear increase with age, with the largest increase (at least four-fold) observed in the 95 + years age subgroup (Fig. 4A-D). The overall trends in ASPR, ASIR, ASDR, and ASR of DALYs for older adults were not quite significant (Fig. 4E-H). In 2021, the mortality rate per 100,000 in the ≥ 65 years age group increased with age (from 4.5 in the 65–69 years group to 596 in the 95 + years group), with DALYs showing a similar pattern (Fig. 4G-H). The decline in morbidity was consistently greater in males than in females across age subgroups. Conversely, between ages 70 and 95 years, the increase in male mortality consistently exceeded that in females (Supplementary Table S2). These epidemiological trends are complicated by clinical factors like comorbidities and frailty, discussed further in the discussion.
Drivers of AF/AFL epidemiology: ageing, population growth and epidemiological change
To assess the impact of aging, population growth, and epidemiological changes on AF/AFL epidemiology, we performed a decomposition analysis of prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and DALYs. Globally, AF/AFL prevalence, mortality, and DALYs increased significantly, particularly in the high SDI quintile (Fig. 5A and C-D). Incidence also increased significantly, most notably in the middle SDI quintile (Fig. 5B). Population aging accounted for a 5.06% increase in the burden of AF/AFL prevalence between 1990 and 2021, while population growth contributed 95.17% (Table 2). The middle-high SDI quintile drove the majority of the increase in AF/AFL prevalence (99.26%), while population growth contributed the least in middle SDI countries (88.18%) (Table 2).
Fig. 5.
Analysis of changes in AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs globally and across SDI quintiles (1990–2021), based on population aging, population growth, and epidemiological change. (A) Prevalence; (B) Incidence; (C) Deaths; (D) DALYs. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life-years, SDI Socio-demographic index
Table 2.
Decomposition analysis of age-standardized rates of prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and DALYs by SDI quintile
| Determinants | Prevalence | Incidence | Deaths | DALYs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ageing | Population | EC | Ageing | Population | EC | Ageing | Population | EC | Ageing | Population | EC | |
| Global | 1171981.73 (5.06%) | 22041808.98 (95.17%) | −52124.98 (−0.23%) | 33124.83 (2%) | 1674554.67 (101.26%) | −53958.97 (−3.26%) | 45964.41 (21.26%) | 164979.71 (76.3%) | 5267.88 (2.44%) | 466398.26 (11.24%) | 3676919.79 (88.63%) | 5120.79 (0.12%) |
| Low SDI | 34582.12 (4.51%) | 690833.59 (90.19%) | 40582.11 (5.3%) | 2177.38 (3.33%) | 60375.89 (92.27%) | 2877.48 (4.4%) | 712.34 (11.13%) | 4560.9 (71.23%) | 1129.76 (17.64%) | 9156.13 (6.37%) | 117079.98 (81.48%) | 17459.73 (12.15%) |
| Low-middle SDI | 119894.97 (3.81%) | 2899481.37 (92.25%) | 123693.95 (3.94%) | 7372.47 (2.75%) | 253019.5 (94.35%) | 7779.53 (2.9%) | 2666.93 (9.99%) | 18113.79 (67.85%) | 5915.82 (22.16%) | 32329.22 (5.61%) | 458236.32 (79.58%) | 85222.55 (14.8%) |
| Middle SDI | 401574.61 (5.63%) | 6288434.36 (88.18%) | 441173.45 (6.19%) | 26421.89 (4.8%) | 513901.68 (93.36%) | 10153.4 (1.84%) | 12665.76 (21.52%) | 45474.63 (77.26%) | 717.28 (1.22%) | 140451.81 (11.49%) | 1047310.91 (85.65%) | 35079.74 (2.87%) |
| High-middle SDI | 245891.18 (5.27%) | 4628761.61 (99.26%) | −211165.37 (−4.53%) | 5825.74 (1.89%) | 332106.67 (107.99%) | −30407.44 (−9.89%) | 13245.73 (26.48%) | 36516.02 (73%) | 257.06 (0.51%) | 127600.75 (14.31%) | 795829.05 (89.27%) | −31985.13 (−3.59%) |
| High SDI | 519301.38 (6.98%) | 6704867.44 (90.14%) | 213770.55 (2.87%) | −1087.64 (−0.24%) | 474002.51 (102.87%) | −12123.72 (−2.63%) | 22343.31 (30.18%) | 52848.78 (71.37%) | −1148.07 (−1.55%) | 218,209 (16.64%) | 1116598.93 (85.17%) | −23724.73 (−1.81%) |
AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life-years, EC Epidemiological change, SDI Socio-demographic index
The incidence of AF/AFL significantly increased globally and across all SDI quintiles over three decades. Globally, population growth and aging increased AF/AFL incidence by 101.26% and 2.00%, respectively, between 1990 and 2021 (Table 2). Population growth in the middle-high SDI quintile was the primary driver. The effect of population aging on incidence was most significant in the middle SDI quintile (4.80%), followed by low SDI (3.33%), middle-low SDI (2.75%), middle-high SDI (1.89%), and least in the high SDI quintile (0.24%) (Table 2).
After adjusting for age and population, global AF/AFL DALYs and mortality rates showed an upward trend. Population growth contributed most to mortality in the middle-high SDI quintile (77.26%) and to DALYs in the same quintile (89.27%) (Table 2). Epidemiological changes (reflecting age- and population-adjusted changes in AF/AFL mortality and DALYs) increased globally, with more pronounced increases in the middle-low, low, middle, and middle-high SDI quintiles, and decreases in the high SDI quintile (Fig. 5; Table 2).
AF/AFL and socio-demographic development
From 1990 to 2021, the overall ASPR of AF/AFL increased with increasing SDI across 204 country regions, with ASIR following a similar trend (Fig. 6A-B). The ASDR increased with increasing SDI before stabilizing at an SDI of approximately 0.80; the age-standardized DALYs rate followed a similar pattern (Fig. 6C-D). These findings, supported by visualizations of health inequities, suggest a higher disease burden in populations with high SDIs (Supplementary Figure S3).
Fig. 6.
Age-standardized rates of AF/AFL across 204 countries and territories, by SDI in 2021. (A) Prevalence; (B) Incidence; (C) Deaths; (D) DALYs. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life years, SDI Socio-demographic index
Frontier analysis examining the correlation between AF/AFL dalys and the level of national development
Using 2021 DALYs and SDI data, we assessed the effective variance between countries and regions and the frontier. As SDI increased, the effective variance tended to decrease, with a relatively small variance overall. The top 15 countries with the worst performance (highest effective variance) included Montenegro, Sweden, Nauru, Austria, Germany, Greenland, Micronesia (Federated States of), New Zealand, Dominica, Iceland, Honduras, Slovakia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, the United States of America, and the Northern Mariana Islands (Fig. 7). These countries had much higher standardized AF/AFL DALY rates than other countries with similar SDI levels. Among countries with an SDI > 0.85, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Iceland, and the United States showed the largest effective differences (Fig. 7). Among countries with an SDI < 0.5, Somalia, Ethiopia, Burundi, Mali, and Niger showed the smallest effective differences (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
Frontier analyses of AF/AFL DALYs and SDI among individuals aged ≥ 65 years (1990–2021) across 204 countries and territories. (A) Frontier analysis based on SDI and age-standardized AF/AFL DALY rates. The color scale denotes years, with blue representing 1990 and grey representing 2021. Solid black lines are used to demarcate the frontier; (B) Frontier analysis based on SDI and age-standardized AF/AFL DALY rates for 2021. Countries and regions are represented by dots, with the solid black line denoting the frontier. The top 15 countries with the largest gap to the frontier AF/AFL DALY rate are highlighted in black font. Countries and regions with high SDI values (> 0.85) and significant effect differences relative to their development level are marked in red font, while frontier countries with low SDI values (< 0.5) and minimal effect differences are indicated in blue font. Red dots signify a decrease in age-standardized AF/AFL DALY rates between 1990 and 2021, whereas blue dots indicate an increase. AF/AFL Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, DALYs Disability-adjusted life years, SDI Socio-demographic index
Discussion
This study comprehensively analyzed global and regional trends in AF/AFL prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs among individuals aged 65 and older from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and SDI quintiles. Our findings reveal a substantial increase in the global burden of AF/AFL across all metrics. In 2021, we observed 38,959.43 thousand prevalent cases (146.61% increase), 2,885.69 thousand incident cases (134.23% increase), 930.95 thousand DALYs (162.35% increase), and 6703.66 thousand deaths (203.91% increase).
Geographical location and socioeconomic development significantly influence the AF/AFL burden. High-income North America showed the highest ASPR, while high-income Asia Pacific showed the lowest. This disparity may reflect differences in cardiovascular diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction [25], valvular heart disease [26], hypertension [27]), risk factors (e.g., alcohol consumption [28], diabetes [29, 30]), cultural factors, and access to healthcare [31]. Importantly, we observed a significant rise in ASPR and ASIR in regions with initially low prevalence, including sub-Saharan Africa and Eastern Europe.
Consistent with all-age studies, AF/AFL prevalence among those aged 65 + was positively associated with SDI, likely reflecting differences in risk factor prevalence, healthcare access, and AF awareness [32]. The increasing ASPR in populous Asian and African countries presents a major public health challenge, demanding attention from healthcare providers and policymakers. Strategies in high-SDI regions with stable prevalence should focus on disseminating new technologies and collecting robust data to inform future treatment. In regions experiencing rapid increases in morbidity and limited resources, prioritizing accurate diagnosis, treatment access, and infrastructure development (including basic medical facilities, healthcare worker training, and diagnostic tools) is crucial.
While AF/AFL incidence, prevalence, deaths, and DALYs increased significantly in all age subgroups over 65, a gradual decline in ASDR has been observed in some specific regions, particularly in high-SDI regions. This trend may be attributed to several factors, including the increased use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), improvements in comprehensive AF/AFL management, and technological advancements such as catheter ablation [33, 34]. Furthermore, emerging technologies (artificial intelligence, wearable devices [35–40]) hold promise for improving patient outcomes and reducing the disease burden.
Our study also revealed lower ASIR and ASPR of AF/AFL in women than in men aged 65 and older. This observation likely reflects sex-based differences in traditional risk factors, such as body size and higher rates of smoking and alcohol consumption typically seen in men [41, 42]. However, this unadjusted finding presents an incomplete picture and masks a well-documented paradox in clinical practice. Some studies suggest that after adjusting for factors like height and body size, women may have an intrinsically higher risk of developing AF/AFL, possibly due to differences in cardiac physiology [41]. This complexity extends beyond incidence to clinical outcomes, where the data appear conflicting. While the GBD data report higher mortality in men [32], some clinical studies highlight that women with AF/AFL often experience worse outcomes [43]. For instance, women tend to have a higher burden of comorbidities, are less likely to receive rhythm control therapy, and may suffer from higher rates of heart failure due to delayed diagnosis, as noted in a recent 2023 study [44]. These discrepancies may reflect variations in study design or unadjusted comorbidities. Taken together, these seemingly contradictory findings suggest that the impact of sex on AF/AFL is multifaceted, where the lower incidence rates observed in women in large-scale epidemiological data may be offset by worse clinical outcomes driven by a combination of biological predispositions and disparities in clinical management. Therefore, further investigation into gender-specific risk stratification and treatment strategies is urgently needed to address these disparities [45].
Decomposition analysis showed the middle SDI quintile experienced the most substantial rise in AF/AFL incidence over the past 30 years, potentially due to increasing risk factors, improved healthcare access, and greater awareness in newly industrialized nations. High-SDI regions, while exhibiting some decline in epidemiological trends, still contribute most to overall mortality and DALYs, largely driven by population aging and growth. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive, region-specific strategies to enhance healthcare services, preventive measures, and treatment approaches to effectively manage the growing global burden of AF/AFL.
Frontier analysis revealed variations in AF/AFL DALY rates across SDI quintiles, with many countries showing values significantly different from the expected benchmark based on SDI. Among high-SDI countries, divergent outcomes are evident, such as lower DALY rates in Sweden compared to the U.S., likely reflecting Sweden’s universal healthcare system that facilitates early AF/AFL diagnosis and management, contrasted with the U.S.’s fragmented healthcare system and higher prevalence of obesity, a key risk factor [46, 47]. Conversely, some low-SDI countries, such as Ethiopia, demonstrate unexpectedly low AF/AFL DALY rates despite limited resources. Possible explanations include strengths such as effective community-based health systems or lower prevalence of Western lifestyle risk factors (e.g., smoking, obesity), but also methodological limitations, including underreporting due to limited diagnostic capacity, a younger demographic structure with fewer elderly at risk, and reduced survival among those with chronic comorbidities, which may mask the true burden [48]. Distinguishing between true policy efficiency and data limitations is therefore crucial before drawing broader inferences. These findings highlight the need for future research to evaluate healthcare system impacts in high-SDI settings and to validate low-SDI outcomes through improved surveillance and longitudinal studies [46–48].
Beyond epidemiological patterns, the clinical complexity of elderly patients with AF/AFL warrants particular consideration. While our analysis quantified the global burden of AF/AFL, prognosis in older adults is strongly influenced by factors not captured in large-scale datasets such as the GBD, including comorbidity burden and geriatric syndromes. For example, ischemic heart disease frequently coexists with AF/AFL and markedly worsens prognosis, particularly in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, where treatment often requires balancing anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies [49, 50]. Equally critical is the role of frailty, a powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in older adults with cardiovascular disease [51]. Frailty creates a clinical paradox: patients at the highest risk of stroke are often under-prescribed anticoagulation due to concerns about falls and bleeding [52]. Although evidence supports the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation in frail patients [53], decision-making remains highly individualized and cannot be fully reflected in population-level epidemiological estimates. Taken together, these considerations underscore that while AF/AFL cases continue to rise globally, the true challenge lies in managing the most clinically complex elderly patients. Future research that integrates large administrative datasets with granular clinical and geriatric assessments is essential to guide patient-centered strategies and optimize outcomes.
Despite the continuous updates and valuable health metrics provided by the GBD, several limitations warrant consideration. First, GBD data rely on statistical modeling rather than national clinical records, potentially reducing accuracy in low-resource settings with weak surveillance systems. Regional variations in disease management may further lead to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of AF/AFL, affecting data reliability [54]. Second, population heterogeneity in health systems, epidemiological transitions, and diagnostic capacities significantly limits the direct comparability of global AF/AFL burden across regions, particularly due to likely underreporting in low-resource settings such as sub-Saharan Africa [51]. Intra-group analyses within similar SDI categories, as conducted in our frontier analysis, yield more meaningful insights than generalized global comparisons. Third, the lack of differentiation between AF/AFL subtypes (e.g., paroxysmal, persistent, permanent AF; typical vs. atypical flutter) restricts clinical and policy applicability. Finally, attributing mortality and DALYs solely to AF/AFL without adjusting for comorbidities (e.g., heart failure, stroke, diabetes) or geriatric conditions like frailty may overestimate disease burden, potentially masking regional variations in prevalence or outcomes [55, 56]. Future studies with granular clinical data could address these limitations to enhance accuracy and applicability. Additionally, this study did not quantify the economic burden associated with AF/AFL, including healthcare costs and productivity losses. Future studies should address this limitation by estimating the economic impact of AF/AFL to inform resource allocation and policy development across diverse socioeconomic contexts.
This study utilized the GBD database, a leading source of global health data, to analyze AF/AFL trends from 1990 to 2021. The application of decomposition and frontier analyses provided further insights into the influence of demographic trends and facilitated cross-country comparisons.
Conclusions
The global burden of AF/AFL among individuals aged ≥ 65 years has increased substantially from 1990 to 2021, with marked regional disparities. Our findings reveal considerable rises in prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs, particularly in regions that previously had lower prevalence. Population aging and growth are the main drivers, with epidemiological changes also contributing. These results underscore the urgent need for strengthening healthcare infrastructure, enhancing diagnostic capacity, and implementing efficient AF/AFL management strategies tailored to regional contexts. Although our study did not quantify the economic burden associated with AF/AFL, future research should address this important aspect, for example by estimating healthcare costs and productivity losses related to the increasing disease burden.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for all participation and support in this study.
Abbreviations
- AAPC
Average annual percentage change
- AF
Atrial fibrillation
- AFL
Atrial flutter
- ASR
Age-standardized rate
- ASDR
Age-standardized death rate
- ASIR
Age-standardized incidence rate
- ASPR
Age-standardized prevalence rate
- DALYs
Disability-adjusted life years
- ECG
Electrocardiogram
- GBD
Global Burden of Disease Study
- NOACs
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
- SDI
Socio-demographic index
- UIs
Uncertainty intervals
- YLDs
Years lived with disability
- YLLs
Years of life lost
Authors’ contributions
Bo Yang and Shao Bo Shi provided ideas; Jing Lin Wang accessed and verified the data; Jing Lin Wang and Yi Ling Li organized the figure and wrote the manuscript; Bo Yang and Shao Bo Shi revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed to publish.
Funding
The study was supported by The Interdisciplinary Innovative Talents Foundation from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (JCRCZN-2022-003) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042024YXB003).
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study did not involve human participants, biological samples, or direct interaction with individuals. Ethical approval and the requirement for informed consent were waived by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Washington. This exemption is granted under U.S. federal regulations (45 CFR 46.104(d)(4)) for research involving the secondary analysis of publicly available, de-identified data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study, a fully anonymized dataset containing no personal identifiers. As this research exclusively utilized non-identifiable aggregated data, the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki were not applicable. This exemption is explicitly permitted under Paragraph 32 of the Declaration for research involving anonymized public datasets and was formally confirmed by the University of Washington IRB in accordance with U.S. federal regulations (45 CFR 46.104(d)(4)).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Shao-Bo Shi, Email: shiyige@whu.edu.cn.
Bo Yang, Email: yybb112@whu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Vinciguerra M, Dobrev D, Nattel S. Atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;37:100785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Newman JD, O’Meara E, Böhm M, Savarese G, Kelly PR, Vardeny O, Allen LA, Lancellotti P, Gottlieb SS, Samad Z, et al. Implications of atrial fibrillation for Guideline-Directed therapy in patients with heart failure: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(9):932–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shu H, Cheng J, Li N, Zhang Z, Nie J, Peng Y, Wang Y, Wang DW, Zhou N. Obesity and atrial fibrillation: a narrative review from arrhythmogenic mechanisms to clinical significance. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bode D, Pronto JRD, Schiattarella GG, Voigt N. Metabolic remodelling in atrial fibrillation: manifestations, mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Ngo LTH, Peng Y, Denman R, Yang I, Ranasinghe I. Long-term outcomes after hospitalization for atrial fibrillation or flutter. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(24):2133–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, Schnabel RB. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: novel methods and new insights. Circ Res. 2020;127(1):4–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kalarus Z, Mairesse GH, Sokal A, Boriani G, Średniawa B, Casado-Arroyo R, Wachter R, Frommeyer G, Traykov V, Dagres N, et al. Searching for atrial fibrillation: looking harder, looking longer, and in increasingly sophisticated ways. An EHRA position paper. Europace. 2023;25(1):185–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jones NR, Taylor CJ, Hobbs FDR, Bowman L, Casadei B. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a call for evidence. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(10):1075–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shi S, Tang Y, Zhao Q, Yan H, Yu B, Zheng Q, Li Y, Zheng L, Yuan Y, Zhong J, et al. Prevalence and risk of atrial fibrillation in china: A National cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;23:100439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meschia JF, Merrill P, Soliman EZ, Howard VJ, Barrett KM, Zakai NA, Kleindorfer D, Safford M, Howard G. Racial disparities in awareness and treatment of atrial fibrillation: the reasons for geographic and Racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):581–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frewen J, Finucane C, Cronin H, Rice C, Kearney PM, Harbison J, Kenny RA. Factors that influence awareness and treatment of atrial fibrillation in older adults. QJM. 2013;106(5):415–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: an increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(2):217–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Global burden. Of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Global regional. National mortality among young people aged 10–24 years, 1950–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2021;398(10311):1593–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Global incidence. prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2133–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang K, Yang X, Jin C, Ding S, Liu T, Ma B, Sun H, Zhang J, Li Y. Global burden of type 1 diabetes in adults aged 65 years and older, 1990–2019: population based study. BMJ. 2024;385:e078432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kocarnik JM, Compton K, Dean FE, Fu W, Gaw BL, Harvey JD, Henrikson HJ, Lu D, Pennini A, Xu R, et al. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, years of life Lost, years lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(3):420–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997;16(7):791–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19(3):335–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Das Gupta P. Standardization and decomposition of rates from cross-classified data. Genus. 1994;50(3–4):171–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chevan A, Sutherland M. Revisiting Das gupta: refinement and extension of standardization and decomposition. Demography. 2009;46(3):429–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang ZM, Lin ZL, He BX, Yan WT, Zhang XY, Zhang ZH, Wang L, Wang JQ, Liu DM, Zhang W, et al. Epidemiological analysis reveals a surge in inflammatory bowel disease among children and adolescents: A global, regional, and National perspective from 1990 to 2019 - insights from the China study. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Li T, Maddukuri G, Tsai CY, Floyd T, Al-Aly Z. Analysis of the global burden of disease study highlights the global, regional, and National trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int. 2018;94(3):567–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qu C, Liao S, Zhang J, Cao H, Zhang H, Zhang N, Yan L, Cui G, Luo P, Zhang Q, et al. Burden of cardiovascular disease among elderly: based on the global burden of disease study 2019. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024;10(2):143–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li Y, Wu YF, Chen KP, Li X, Zhang X, Xie GQ, Wang FZ, Zhang S. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in China and its risk factors. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013;26(9):709–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, Larson MG, Beiser AS, McManus DD, Newton-Cheh C, Lubitz SA, Magnani JW, Ellinor PT, et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham heart study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386(9989):154–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun GZ, Guo L, Wang XZ, Song HJ, Li Z, Wang J, Sun YX. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and its risk factors in rural china: a cross-sectional study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;182:13–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Larsson SC, Drca N, Wolk A. Alcohol consumption and risk of atrial fibrillation: a prospective study and dose-response meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(3):281–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang A, Green JB, Halperin JL, Piccini JP. Atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(8):1107–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goudis CA, Ketikoglou DG. Obstructive sleep and atrial fibrillation: pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:293–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Du X, Guo L, Xia S, Du J, Anderson C, Arima H, Huffman M, Yuan Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, et al. Atrial fibrillation prevalence, awareness and management in a nationwide survey of adults in China. Heart. 2021;107(7):535–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang L, Ze F, Li J, Mi L, Han B, Niu H, Zhao N. Trends of global burden of atrial fibrillation/flutter from global burden of disease study 2017. Heart. 2021;107(11):881–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, et al. : 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European society of cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European heart rhythm association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr., Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Sanyal A, Edwards AM, Ariniello LM, Ebner GS, Baca-Motes K, Zambon RA, Sarich T, Topol EJ. Three year clinical outcomes in a nationwide, observational, siteless clinical trial of atrial fibrillation screening-mHealth screening to prevent strokes (mSToPS). PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Edwards AM, Ariniello LM, Mehta RR, Ebner GS, Carter C, Baca-Motes K, Felicione E, Sarich T, et al. Effect of a Home-Based wearable continuous ECG monitoring patch on detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: the mSToPS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(2):146–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koshy AN, Sajeev JK, Teh AW. Letter by Koshy et al regarding Article, assessment of remote heart rhythm sampling using the AliveCor heart monitor to screen for atrial fibrillation: the REHEARSE-AF study. Circulation. 2018;137(20):2191–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yuan N, Duffy G, Dhruva SS, Oesterle A, Pellegrini CN, Theurer J, Vali M, Heidenreich PA, Keyhani S, Ouyang D. Deep learning of electrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from US veterans to predict atrial fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(12):1131–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo Y, Wang H, Zhang H, Liu T, Liang Z, Xia Y, Yan L, Xing Y, Shi H, Li S, et al. Mobile photoplethysmographic technology to detect atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(19):2365–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, Balasubramanian V, Russo AM, Rajmane A, Cheung L, et al. Large-Scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(20):1909–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM, Gianfagna F, Blankenberg S, Njølstad I, Vartiainen E, Sans S, Pasterkamp G, Hughes M, et al. Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation Epidemiology, risk Factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the biomarcare consortium (Biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment in Europe). Circulation. 2017;136(17):1588–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Siddiqi HK, Vinayagamoorthy M, Gencer B, Ng C, Pester J, Cook NR, Lee IM, Buring J, Manson JE, Albert CM. Sex differences in atrial fibrillation risk: the VITAL rhythm study. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(10):1027–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Evers-Dörpfeld S, Aeschbacher S, Hennings E, Eken C, Coslovsky M, Rodondi N, Beer JH, Moschovitis G, Ammann P, Kobza R, et al. Sex-specific differences in adverse outcome events among patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2022;108(18):1445–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, Deswal A, Eckhardt LL, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: A report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(1):109–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Emdin CA, Wong CX, Hsiao AJ, Altman DG, Peters SA, Woodward M, Odutayo AA. Atrial fibrillation as risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death in women compared with men: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;532:h7013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Verma A, Madrigal J, Coaston T, Ascandar N, Williamson C, Benharash P. Care fragmentation following hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in the united States. JACC Adv. 2023;2(4):100375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lindberg T, Wimo A, Elmståhl S, Qiu C, Bohman DM, Sanmartin Berglund J. Prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias in the general older population: findings from the Swedish National study on aging and care. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019;5:2333721419859687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pitman BM, Chew SH, Wong CX, Jaghoori A, Iwai S, Lyrtzis E, Lim M, Chew RR, Chew A, Sanders P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a semi-rural sub-Saharan African population: the hEart oF ethiopia: focus on atrial fibrillation (TEFF-AF) study. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022;3(6Part B):839–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Díez-Villanueva P, Arizá-Solé A, Vidán MT, Bonanad C, Formiga F, Sanchis J, Martín-Sánchez FJ, Ruiz Ros V, Sanmartín Fernández M, Bueno H, et al. Recommendations of the geriatric cardiology section of the Spanish society of cardiology for the assessment of frailty in elderly patients with heart disease. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019;72(1):63–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rashedi S, Keykhaei M, Sato A, Steg PG, Piazza G, Eikelboom JW, Lopes RD, Bonaca MP, Yasuda S, Ogawa H, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for atrial fibrillation and stable coronary disease: Meta-Analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(11):1189–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Negreira-Caamaño M, Díez-Delhoyo F, Cepas-Guillén P, López-Lluva MT, Jurado-Román A, Bazal-Chacón P, Olavarri-Miguel I, Elorriaga A, Rivera-López R, Blanco-López E, et al. Prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025;78(9):754–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pilotto A, Veronese N, Polidori MC, Strandberg T, Topinkova E, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Custodero C, Barbagallo M, Maggi S. Frailty and anticoagulants in older subjects with atrial fibrillation: the EUROSAF study. Age Ageing. 2023;52(11):afad216. 10.1093/ageing/afad216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim D, Yang PS, Sung JH, Jang E, Yu HT, Kim TH, Uhm JS, Kim JY, Pak HN, Lee MH, et al. Effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy in frail patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2022;53(6):1873–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Karamitanha F, Ahmadi F, Fallahabadi H. Difference between various countries in mortality and incidence rate of the atrial fibrillation based on human development index in worldwide: data from global burden of disease 2010–2019. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48(1):101438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, Deswal A, Eckhardt LL, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: A report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.






