Abstract
Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and torsion of the appendix is exceptionally uncommon. Rupture of an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm can lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei, a condition with high morbidity. We present the case of a 64-year-old male patient with five days of right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a five-centimeter-long, tubular, ring-enhancing lesion, concerning for a mucocele. Intraoperatively, a 360-degree appendiceal torsion was identified, prompting conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy to avoid mucocele rupture. Pathology confirmed a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with negative margins. The patient recovered uneventfully and remained asymptomatic at follow-up. This case underscores the deceptive presentation of a torsed appendiceal mucocele and highlights important technical considerations for optimal operative management of this pathology.
Keywords: appendectomy, appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, appendiceal mucocele, appendiceal torsion, pseudomyxoma peritonei
Introduction
The first case of appendiceal mucocele was described by Rokitansky in 1842, and appendiceal carcinoma was reported several decades later in 1882 [1,2]. In 1918, Payne recorded the first case of torsion of the appendix, a rare phenomenon that may occur either primarily or secondary to underlying pathology [3]. Despite over a century of recognition, these conditions remain uncommon and may be overlooked as causes of abdominal pain [4].
Appendiceal mucoceles account for only 0.2% to 0.3% of appendectomy specimens. Their clinical presentation often mimics acute appendicitis, making preoperative differentiation challenging [4-6]. Mucocele formation is frequently secondary to mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, which are classified as low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), high-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma, and signet-ring cell carcinoma [7].
Although LAMN is the least invasive of the three types of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, all three pathologies can result in mucocele formation. The most feared complication is pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), which arises from mucocele rupture with peritoneal seeding of neoplastic mucinous cells. PMP carries significant morbidity, often requiring cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy [8].
The coexistence of torsion with a LAMN-associated mucocele is exceptionally rare [6]. Awareness of this entity is important, as intraoperative findings may necessitate modification of surgical strategy to prevent rupture and subsequent PMP. We present a case of LAMN diagnosed with preoperative imaging and intraoperatively found to have appendiceal torsion, which was managed successfully with an appendectomy without rupture.
Case presentation
A 64-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a five-day history of right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain. He denied fevers, chills, nausea, or vomiting. His past surgical history included prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. He was hemodynamically normal with a normal white blood cell count (7.84 × 10³ per microliter). Examination revealed localized tenderness in the right lower quadrant without signs of peritonitis.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a well-defined, tubular, ring-enhancing lesion in the RLQ measuring five centimeters, consistent with an appendiceal mucocele (Figures 1, 2).
Figure 1. Coronal section of computed tomography imaging showing distended appendix (arrow).
Figure 2. Axial section of computed tomography imaging showing appendiceal mucocele (arrow).
The patient was started on intravenous fluids and antibiotics and consented for surgery. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a distended appendix with 360 degrees of torsion around its base and a distended mucus-filled body. Given the high risk of rupture and peritoneal seeding with laparoscopic handling of the tensely distended appendix, the procedure was converted to open appendectomy through a lower midline laparotomy (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Appendiceal mucocele with 360 degrees of torsion noted around the base (arrow).
The appendix was gently elevated from the pelvis, detorsed, and transected with a linear stapler along with a healthy cecal cuff (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Operative specimen showing appendix with mucocele.
Postoperative histopathology confirmed a LAMN with mucocele, staged as pTis with negative margins and no metastatic disease. The patient’s recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged home tolerating a regular diet. At two-week follow-up, he remained asymptomatic. He was referred to medical oncology for longitudinal care, and was scheduled for a diagnostic colonoscopy in three months and CT imaging surveillance in one year.
Discussion
Torsion of an appendiceal mucocele is exceedingly rare, with limited literature to guide clinical decision-making [1]. Appendiceal mucocele itself is uncommon and encompasses a spectrum of etiologies from benign cysts to malignant neoplasms such as LAMN [5]. Malignant mucinous neoplasms are particularly concerning due to the risk of PMP if rupture occurs [9].
PMP is characterized by intraperitoneal accumulation of mucin and neoplastic epithelial cells, leading to progressive mucinous ascites, bowel obstruction, and potential pleural involvement. Management requires cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, but recurrence rates remain high, underscoring the importance of preventing rupture [10,11].
Clinical presentation of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms can mimic acute appendicitis when torsion occurs. Preoperative imaging with CT typically reveals a cystic, dilated, tubular structure in the RLQ of the abdomen, but distinguishing benign from malignant mucoceles and detecting torsion preoperatively is difficult [12,13]. In our case, CT identified a ring-enhancing lesion consistent with a mucocele, though torsion was only appreciated intraoperatively. Laparoscopic exploration was initially undertaken; however, the degree of torsion and risk of rupture prompted conversion to open laparotomy. Historically, open resection has been advocated for mucoceles to minimize manipulation and reduce the risk of PMP. Although some authors report successful laparoscopic management, limited follow-up raises concerns regarding occult rupture and delayed recurrence [14-16]. Recurrence of LAMN has been documented up to 10 years post-resection [17,18]. In the era of advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, extreme caution is imperative when proceeding with minimally invasive approaches for appendiceal mucoceles to prioritize safe oncologic removal without rupture.
Complete resection with negative margins is critical for favorable prognosis in LAMN [16]. Surveillance following appendectomy remains debated. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommends two years of monitoring with tumor markers and cross-sectional imaging, whereas the Chicago Consensus Working Group advises no surveillance in cases with negative margins and no perforation or extra-appendiceal mucin [19]. These discrepancies highlight the need for further research on optimal follow-up protocols.
Conclusions
Appendiceal mucocele with torsion is a rare clinical entity that can present as right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Rupture of mucinous neoplasms may lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei, and surgical strategies must be guided by intraoperative findings and cautious handling. In high-risk cases, open approach may be appropriate to minimize the risk of rupture. Ongoing research is needed to refine long-term surveillance guidelines for LAMNs.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Aashish Rajesh
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Aashish Rajesh, Alexander F. Bowers, David M. Dodson, Alexander J. Monson, Courtney Thomas
Drafting of the manuscript: Aashish Rajesh, Alexander F. Bowers, David M. Dodson, Alexander J. Monson, Courtney Thomas
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Aashish Rajesh, Alexander F. Bowers, David M. Dodson, Alexander J. Monson, Courtney Thomas
Supervision: Aashish Rajesh
References
- 1.Appendiceal mucocele and pseudomyxoma peritonei; the clinical boundaries of a subtle disease. Spyropoulos C, Rentis A, Alexaki E, Triantafillidis JK, Vagianos C. Am J Case Rep. 2014;15:355–360. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.890837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Synchronous primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix and colon: case report and literature review. Al-Wiswasy MK, Al-Balas H, Al-Saffar RA, Al-Balas M. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;77:628–633. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Torsion of a mucocele of the vermiform appendix: a case report and review of the literature. Lee CH, Lee MR, Kim JC, Kang MJ, Jeong YJ. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81 Suppl 1:0–50. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.Suppl1.S47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silent but significant: a case report of appendiceal mucocele. Reddy S, Tote D, Zade A, Gopalan V, Bikkumalla S. Cureus. 2024;16:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mucocele of the appendix: a report of five cases. Pitiakoudis M, Tsaroucha AK, Mimidis K, Polychronidis A, Minopoulos G, Simopoulos C. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8:109–112. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0067-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Torsion of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN): a case report. Kidogawa H, Nonomura R, Maruyama K, Okimoto T, Okamoto K. Cureus. 2024;16:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Appendiceal neoplasms. Hatch QM, Gilbert EW. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018;31:278–287. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pseudomyxoma peritonei: natural history and treatment. Mittal R, Chandramohan A, Moran B. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33:511–519. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1310938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with pseudomyxoma peritonei: an enigma for pathologists. Qadri S, Alam K, Alam F, Maheshwari V. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2014;4:113–116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morbidity and mortality of patients with peritoneal malignancy following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Hotza G, Karageorgos M, Pastourmatzi V, et al. Discov Oncol. 2024;15:106. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-00968-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morbidity and mortality after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in a national reference center: a six-year experience under independent evaluation. Alberto Vilchez ME, Halskov S, Winter A, Pratschke J, Rau B, Gül S. J Clin Med. 2024;13 doi: 10.3390/jcm13175182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Diagnostic challenges and treatment options for mucocele of the appendix: a comprehensive review. Gopalan V, Khan IA, Zade AA, Malhotra G, Durge S, Jain Y, Rekavari SG. Cureus. 2024;16:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mucocele of the appendix: what to expect. Santos SF, Horta M, Rosa F, Rito M, Cunha TM. Radiol Bras. 2022;55:193–198. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.А case of a mucocele of the appendix - a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Jelev G, Vassilev I, Usheva S, Yanev T, Sedloev T. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;105:108082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minimally invasive appendectomy for resection of appendiceal mucocele: case series and review of the literature. Orcutt ST, Anaya DA, Malafa M. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;37:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pediatric mucinous neoplasm of the appendix presenting as a mucocele: a case report and review of the literature. Rich BS, Roychoudhury S, Williamson AK, Glick RD. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2017;17:11–14. [Google Scholar]
- 17.A multi-institutional study of peritoneal recurrence following resection of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Baumgartner JM, Srivastava A, Melnitchouk N, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:4685–4694. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09499-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Risk stratification of surveillance for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Lohani KR, Sonani H, Buckarma E, Lee HE, Vierkant RA, Thiels CA, Grotz TE. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;28:1906–1911. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.A scoping review of postoperative surveillance strategies for localized, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Oravec N, Mack L, Hallock D, McClurg C, Quan ML. Am J Surg. 2025;242:116202. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




