Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2025 Nov 20;13:e20146. doi: 10.7717/peerj.20146

Effectiveness of multi-component exercise in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhiyuan Sun 1,2,#, Haiqing Zeng 1,#, Hualei Liu 1, Mengqi Hu 1, Xuewen Tian 1, Dewei Mao 2,3, Rui Zhang 1,
Editor: Selina Khoo
PMCID: PMC12640639  PMID: 41287857

Abstract

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of multi-component exercise interventions on glycemic and lipid metabolism, physical fitness, and cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

From inception to December 28, 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Elsevier databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating multi-component exercise interventions for T2DM. A total of 37 articles, comprising 3,201 participants, were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures were categorized, summarized, and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

Compared to control groups, multi-component exercise interventions produced statistically significant improvements across all measured outcomes in individuals with T2DM: (1) Glycemic control: HbA1c (standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−0.76 to −0.28]); fasting blood glucose (SMD = −0.53, 95% CI [−0.93 to −0.12]). (2) Lipid metabolism: high density lipoprotein (HDL) (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.21–0.44]); low density lipoprotein (LDL) (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI [−0.33 to −0.09]); triglycerides (SMD = −0.18, 95% CI [−0.30 to −0.06]). (3) Physical fitness: upper limb strength (SMD = 0.67, 95% CI [0.51–0.83]); lower limb strength (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI [0.10–1.02]); peak oxygen consumption (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI [0.31–0.93]); body mass index (BMI) (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI [−0.67 to −0.09]). (4) Cognitive function: overall cognitive performance (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.18–0.50]). (5) Quality of life: vitality (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI [0.09–0.64]); physical functioning (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.20–0.75]); mental health (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.07–0.63]); general health (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.06–0.61]). Quality assessment indicated that the included studies were of high overall quality. Egger’s regression analysis did not reveal significant publication bias.

Conclusions

Multi-component exercise interventions significantly improved glycemic and lipid metabolism, physical fitness, and cognitive function in individuals with T2DM. These findings support the clinical value of incorporating multi-component exercise programs—particularly those performed at least three times per week and lasting 6 months or longer—into diabetes management strategies.

Keywords: Multi-component, Type 2 diabetes

Introduction

Diabetes is the most prevalent metabolic disease globally, with projections indicating that the number of individuals affected will reach to 1.3 billion by 2050 (GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators, 2023). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for 90–95% of all diabetes cases (Pedroso et al., 2021). The prevalence of diabetes and its associated complications poses a significant threat to global health (Zheng, Ley & Hu, 2018) compromising the self-management capabilities of individuals with T2DM and placing additional pressure on national healthcare systems. While pharmacological treatments can manage hyperglycemia, their long-term effectiveness is limited (Raveendran, Chacko & Pappachan, 2018), and improper usage may double the risk of dementia among T2DM patients (Mcmillan et al., 2018). Given this context a multidisciplinary approach is urgently needed to protect the health of the global T2DM population.

Clinical practice has indicated that exercise, as a non-pharmacological intervention, is effective in ameliorating glycolipid metabolic dysregulation in patients with T2DM (Lin et al., 2023). Common exercise modalities include aerobic, resistance, and multi-component exercises. Multi-component exercise involves interventions using two or more types of exercise (Suzuki et al., 2012), such as a combination of aerobic and resistance training, balance/coordination, and flexibility exercises. Studies show that multi-component exercise outperformed single-modality exercise in improving glycemic control (Silveira-Rodrigues et al., 2021), lipid levels (Schwingshackl et al., 2014), and inflammatory status (Hopps, Canino & Caimi, 2011) among patients with T2DM. Beyond metabolic effects, multi-component exercise can induce beneficial neural adaptations through neuroplasticity and various signaling pathways, leading to enhanced cognitive functions, attention, and verbal fluency. Additionally, it may exert restorative effects on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the elderly (Umpierre et al., 2013). Specifically, single-mode exercises have unique mechanisms that improve the health status of patients with T2DM (Zhang et al., 2024). Compared to single-mode exercises (such as aerobic or resistance training), the benefits of multi-component exercise seem to stem not only from an increase in total exercise volume but also from the synergistic effects generated by combining different types of exercise, which provides greater advantages (Sigal et al., 2007; Balducci et al., 2007). For example, resistance training increases muscle mass and glycogen storage (Knuiman, Hopman & Mensink, 2015), while aerobic exercise enhances mitochondrial function and glucose utilization (Wang et al., 2020). Together, these effects help improve blood glucose control by reducing insulin resistance and enhancing glucose metabolism (Yavari et al., 2012). In terms of cardiovascular health, aerobic exercise improves cardiac output, vascular function, and endothelial health (Al-Mhanna et al., 2023), while resistance training contributes to better arterial stiffness and blood pressure regulation (Okamoto, Masuhara & Ikuta, 2013). By combining these benefits, multi-component exercise can improve cardiovascular health and enhance cardiac function. Global recommendations for multi-component exercise in individuals with T2DM have been substantial (Care, 2018). Although current systematic reviews have confirmed that multi-component exercise is superior to single-mode exercise in improving blood glucose (Sun et al., 2024a), inflammation (Xing et al., 2022), and cognitive function (Sun et al., 2024b), patients with T2DM face not only dysregulated glucose and lipid metabolism but also complications such as sarcopenia (Anagnostis et al., 2020) and impaired cardiopulmonary function (Pugliese et al., 2023). However, there is still a lack of systematic reviews evaluating the overall effects of multi-component exercise on the health status of elderly patients with T2DM, indicating that further research is needed to comprehensively assess its overall benefits. Compared to previous meta-analyses, this review provides a detailed compilation and summary of the effects of multi-component exercise interventions on improving HbA1c, blood glucose, lipid metabolism, cognitive function, and physical fitness in individuals with T2DM, offering theoretical support for the use of multi-component exercise in preventing and improving the overall function of patients with T2DM.

Methods

This study adhered to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009), This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and the registration number is CRD42024527965.

Literature search strategy

From inception to December 28, 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Elsevier databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating multi-component exercise interventions for diabetes. Independent searches were conducted by two researchers in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Elsevier databases, using a Boolean combination of terms related to study type (randomized controlled trials), target population (T2DM), and intervention (multi-component exercise). Additional manual searches were conducted to ensure completeness by reviewing references of included studies. The search strategy details are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. The search terms of the literature included in this study.

Group Subject word
1 Randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, randomized, randomised, trial, groups, RCT
2 Associated movement, combined training, multi-mode motion, multi-mode locomotion, multi-modal motion, various forms of exercise, multi-component exercise, aerobic combined with resistance exercise
3 Diabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, type 2 diabetic mellitus, diabetes mellitus, 2 diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabete, type 2 diabetic, T2D

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Following the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) framework, this meta-analysis considered study design, population, intervention measures, and outcomes, with language restrictions. Inclusion criteria: (1) Subjects: patients with T2DM, diagnosed according to standardized guidelines by the American Diabetes Association (Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, SOC), World Health Organization (WHO), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF); (2) Intervention: combinations of two or more types of exercise; (3) Outcomes: HbA1c, glycemia, lipid metabolism, physical fitness, cognitive function, quality of life; (4) Study design: RCTs published in English, with no significant pre-intervention differences between experimental and control groups; (5) Control group: Participants receiving no exercise intervention, usual care only, or minimal physical activity (e.g., stretching, relaxation techniques, or health education sessions) that is not expected to significantly affect metabolic or physical outcomes. Exclusion criteria: (1) Studies irrelevant to the research theme (non-T2DM or single-mode exercise interventions); (2) Non-RCTs; (3) Duplicates or overlapping studies; (4) Studies with incomplete outcome data, making it impossible to convert mean differences for meta-analysis.

Literature screening and data extraction

Two researchers (ZHQ and SZY) independently screened titles and abstracts using EndNote X9, followed by full-text assessments to determine inclusion. Discrepancies in data extraction were resolved through consensus discussions between the two researchers (ZHQ and SZY). If consensus could not be reached, a third researcher (LHL) made the final decision. Data extraction information includes the following four aspects. (1) basic information: first author, year of publication; (2) study characteristics: sample size and age of experimental and control groups, intervention measures, period, frequency; (3) research outcomes: primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c, glycemia, and lipid metabolism; secondary outcomes were changes in physical fitness, cognitive function; (4) for continuous outcomes, mean differences between baseline and endpoint for intervention and control groups were converted into effect sizes. The final data extraction table was completed with the intervention of a third researcher (LHL).

Risk of bias and quality assessment

A total of 37 studies were included and assessed for bias and quality using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. Each study underwent assessment based on various criteria, including sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. Subsequently, studies were categorized according to their risk of bias (low, high, uncertain) and were independently evaluated for the quality of evidence pertaining to each outcome. Discrepancies were discussed with a third researcher until consensus was reached. Based on the assessment, included studies were graded as: (A) satisfying five or more low-risk items; (B) three to four low-risk items; (C) two or fewer low-risk items.

Statistical methods

The outcome data of the included studies were analyzed using Revman 5.4. All outcomes were continuous variables and standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to combine effect sizes. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using a chi-squared test, with P < 0.10 indicating significant heterogeneity. Additionally, I2 was used to assess the degree of heterogeneity; If I2 > 50%, significant heterogeneity is considered present, and a random-effects model is employed to pool effect sizes. The robustness of the results was then assessed by excluding low-quality studies or those that contributed substantially to the heterogeneity. If heterogeneity was low or unclear, we applied a fixed-effects model. Furthermore, for outcome measures with more than 10 studies, a fixed-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Publication bias for each outcome was evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively using Egger’s test and funnel plots. Effect sizes for all outcomes were pooled and assessed with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with statistical significance level set at 0.05.

Results

Literature search results

The initial search yielded 10,360 articles, which were imported into EndNote X9 for deduplication, leaving 8,223 articles. Titles and abstracts were further screened, excluding 7,864 unrelated articles, leaving 359 articles. Full-text screening identified 37 articles that met the criteria for meta-analysis. The specific screening stages and criteria are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection procedure.

Figure 1

Characteristics of included studies

The 37 articles included in this review utilized multi-component exercise interventions, encompassing a total of 3,201 participants. Sex proportion was reported across all studies,with 1,535 males and 1,666 females included. Moreover, 34 articles provided the average ages for both control and intervention groups, with ages ranging from 50 to 89 years. The exercise interventions varied, with 25 articles involving combined aerobic and resistance training, three articles incorporating aerobic resistance training with balance exercises, two featuring water-based aerobic and resistance training, two including mind-body exercises, and one each of the following: aerobic resistance training combined with leisure activities, folk dance combined with resistance training, sensory motor exercises combined with gait training, walking combined with resistance training, and strength training combined with balance exercises. In terms of exercise frequency, 30 articles required an exercise frequency of ≥3 times per week, while six articles set a minimum of twice per week. The duration of the interventions was less than 6 months in 20 articles and 6 months or longer in 17 articles. Detailed characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Characteristics of the included studies.

Author (year) Subjects Intervention measures Outcome
Male/female Age (years) Intervention exercise Control group Frequency (times/week) Duration (week/month)
Sigal et al. (2007) 81/46 C: 54.8 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 6 months HbA1c, Lipid metabolis, BMI
I: 53.5 Resistance exercise
Church et al. (2010) 40/77 C: 58.6 Aerobic exercise Stretching and relaxation 3 9 months HbA1c, Peak oxygen uptake
I: 55.4 Resistance exercise
Lambers et al. (2008) 13/15 C: 57.6 Aerobic exercise No intervention 3 3 months HbA1c, Lipid metabolis,
Physical fitness,
Quality of life
I: 55.8 Resistance exercise
Tomas-Carus et al. (2016) 17/13 C: 58.9 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 12 weeks HbA1c, Quality of life
I: 59.9 Resistance exercise
Seyedizadeh, Cheragh-Birjandi & Hamedi Nia (2020) 0/22 C: 60.81 Aerobic exercise No intervention 3 8 weeks Muscle strength
I: 56.69 Resistance exercise
Johansen et al. (2017) 51/47 C: 56.6 Aerobic exercise Standard care 5–6 12 months HbA1c, Lipid metabolis, Physical fitness
I: 53.6 Resistance exercise
Macdonald et al. (2021) 51/47 C: 56.6 Aerobic exercise Standard care 5–6 12 months Quality of life
I: 53.6 Resistance exercise
Aylin et al. (2009) 27/9 C: 56.06 Aerobic exercise No intervention ≥2 8 weeks HbA1c,
Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, BMI,
I: 51.39 Resistance exercise
Myers et al. (2013) 30/47 C: 58.1 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 9 months Quality of life
I: 56.9 Resistance exercise
Balducci et al. (2010) 329/234 C: 58.8 Aerobic exercise Individual consultation 2 12 months HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Physical fitness
I: 58.8 Resistance exercise
Reid et al. (2010) 71/38 C: 55.2 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 6 months Quality of life
I: 53.3 Resistance exercise
Stomby et al. (2017) 71/7 C: 59.0 Aerobic exercise Dietary therapy 3 12 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Physical fitness,
Overall cognitive function
I: 61.0 Resistance exercise
Callisaya et al. (2017) 26/24 C: 67.1 Aerobic exercise Stretching and relaxation 2 6 months Overall cognitive function
I: 65.3 Resistance exercise
Newton et al. (2020) 46/48 C: 53.7 Aerobic exercise Thematic education 2 5 months Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Peak oxygen uptake
I: 50.1 Resistance exercise
Sénéchal et al. (2013) 31/60 C: 58.6 Aerobic exercise Stretching and relaxation 2 9 months Physical fitness
I: 55.9 Resistance exercise
Annibalini et al. (2017) 16/0 C: 60.0 Aerobic exercise Routine care 3 16 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Physical fitness
I: 57.0 resistance exercise
Donyaei et al. (2024) 0/34 C: 61.3 Aerobic exercise No intervention 3 12 weeks Blood sugar
I: 62.1 Resistance exercise
Larose et al. (2010) 81/46 C: 54.8 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 6 months Peak oxygen uptake
I: 53.5 Resistance exercise
Byrkjeland et al. (2015) 95/19 C: 63.2 Aerobic exercise Routine medical follow-up 3 12 months HbA1c, Peak oxygen uptake
I: 64.6 Resistance exercise
Banitalebi et al. (2019) 0/28 C: 55.71 Aerobic exercise Routine care 3 10 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Physical fitness
I: 54.14 Resistance exercise
Sparks et al. (2013) 8/14 C: 60.8 Aerobic exercise Stretching and relaxation 2 9 months HbA1c, Physical fitness
I: 54.1 Resistance exercise
Banitalebi et al. (2021) 0/28 C: 55.71 Aerobic exercise Routine care 3 10 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, BMI
I: 54.14 Resistance exercise
Kadoglou et al. (2013) 12/34 C: 57.9 Aerobic exercise Physical activity 4 6 months HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Physical fitness
I: 57.9 Resistance exercise
De Oliveira et al. (2012) 8/14 C: 53.42 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 12 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Peak oxygen uptake
I: 57.9 Resistance exercise
Jamshidpour, Bahrpeyma & Khatami (2020) 20/8 C: 58.46 Aerobic exercise No intervention 3 8 weeks Quality of life
I: 64.93 Resistance exercise
Delevatti et al. (2022) 20/18 C: 58.6 Aquatic aerobic training Stretching and relaxation 3 15 weeks HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis
I: 60.9 Aquatic resistance training
Delevatti et al. (2020) 20/18 C: 58.6 Aquatic aerobic training Stretching and relaxation 3 15 weeks Peak oxygen uptake
I: 60.9 Aquatic resistance training
Kang, Ko & Baek (2016) 0/16 C: 57.5 Walking resistance exercise Sedentary 3 12 weeks Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, Peak oxygen uptake
I: 56.0
Ghodrati et al. (2023) 0/21 C: 55.8 Aerobic exercise Sedentary 3 12 months HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Physical fitness,
Overall cognitive function
I: 58.8 Resistance exercise
Balance exercise
Martínez-Velilla et al. (2021) 50/53 C: 86.0 Aerobic exercise Routine care 5–7 Continued for 8 days or until discharge Overall cognitive function
I: 87.0 Resistance exercise
Balance exercise
Espeland et al. (2017) 155/260 70–89 Aerobic exercise Health education 3–4 24 months Overall cognitive function
Resistance exercise
Flexibility and balance training
Szilágyi et al. (2019) 74/134 C: 60.10 Aerobic exercise No intervention 3–4 24 weeks BMI
I: 61.83 Resistance exercise
Recreation sports
Jeon et al. (2020) 0/35 C:61.1 Folk dance No intervention 3 12 weeks HbA1c, Lipid metabolis, BMI
I: 62.1 Resistance exercise
Cai et al. (2023) 13/21 C: 61.82 Yi jin jing No intervention 5 6 months HbA1c, Blood sugar,
Lipid metabolis, BMI
I: 63.41 Resistance exercise
Venkataraman et al. (2019) 63/80 62 Power training Drug therapy 1 8 weeks Quality of life
Balance exercise
Yue et al. (2023) 45/38 60.57 Tai Chi health education 3 12 weeks Quality of life
Mindfulness training
Ahmad et al. (2020) 25/13 C: 57.24 Sensorimotor Routine care 3 8 weeks Muscle function
I: 60.33 Gait training

Note:

I, Intervention group; C, Control group.

Risk of bias assessment

Two researchers independently assessed the quality of evidence for each outcome using Cochrane review standards. In cases of disagreement, a third researcher was consulted until consensus was achieved. According to pre-set quality assessment criteria shown in Fig. 2, 31 articles had five or more low-risk items, four articles had three to four low-risk items, and two articles had two or fewer low-risk items. The final assessment categorized 31 articles as Grade A, four as Grade B, and two as Grade C.

Figure 2. Analysis of the risk of bias in accordance with the cochrane collaboration guidelines (Sigal et al., 2007; Church et al., 2010; Lambers et al., 2008; Tomas-Carus et al., 2016; Seyedizadeh, Cheragh-Birjandi & Hamedi Nia, 2020; Johansen et al., 2017; Macdonald et al., 2021; Aylin et al., 2009; Myers et al., 2013; Balducci et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Callisaya et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sénéchal et al., 2013; Annibalini et al., 2017; Donyaei et al., 2024; Larose et al., 2010; Byrkjeland et al., 2015; Banitalebi et al., 2019; Sparks et al., 2013; Banitalebi et al., 2021; Kadoglou et al., 2013; De Oliveira et al., 2012; Jamshidpour, Bahrpeyma & Khatami, 2020; Delevatti et al., 2022, 2020; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Martínez-Velilla et al., 2021; Espeland et al., 2017; Szilágyi et al., 2019; Jeon et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2023; Venkataraman et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2023; Ahmad et al., 2020).

Figure 2

Comprehensive results analysis

Analysis of multi-component exercise intervention on T2DM HbA1c and fasting glucose

Nineteen studies investigated the impact of multi-component exercise on HbA1c levels in patients with T2DM, involving a total of 1,417 participants (Fig. 3). Heterogeneity testing results indicated: χ2 = 61.39, P < 0.001, I2 = 71%, demonstrating heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled effect size was: SMD = −0.52, 95% CI [−0.76 to −0.28], P < 0.001 (Fig. 3). The forest plot showed that the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 3). These results suggest that multi-component exercise effectively improves HbA1c in patients with T2DM.

Figure 3. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Church et al., 2010; Banitalebi et al., 2019, 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Sparks et al., 2013; Johansen et al., 2017; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Tomas-Carus et al., 2016; Sigal et al., 2007; Byrkjeland et al., 2015; Lambers et al., 2008; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020).

Figure 3

Subgroup analyses for exercise frequency were conducted on the 19 included studies. Exercise frequency was categorized into less than 3 days per week and 3 or more days per week (including 3 days). There was heterogeneity in effect size differences between these two groups (I2 = 71%), indicating that exercise frequency significantly modulates the intervention effects (Fig. 4A). Three studies investigated the effect of exercise less than 3 days per week on HbA1c improvement in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 4.22, I2 = 53%, P = 0.12, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.42, 95% CI [−0.88 to 0.03], P = 0.07, indicating no statistically significant difference. Sixteen studies examined the effect of exercising 3 or more days per week on HbA1c improvement in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 52.57, I2 = 71%, P < 0.001, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.54, 95% CI [−0.84 to −0.25], P = 0.0003, indicating a statistically significant difference.

Figure 4. Forest plot of the effect of exercise-related regulation on HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (A) exercise frequency (B) exercise duration (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Church et al., 2010; Banitalebi et al., 2019, 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Sparks et al., 2013; Johansen et al., 2017; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Tomas-Carus et al., 2016; Sigal et al., 2007; Byrkjeland et al., 2015; Lambers et al., 2008; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020).

Figure 4

Exercise duration was categorized into less than 6 months and 6 months or more (including 6 months). There was heterogeneity in effect size differences between these two groups (I2 = 71%), suggesting that exercise duration significantly modulates the intervention effects (Fig. 4B). Ten studies investigated the effect of exercise lasting less than 6 months on HbA1c improvement in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 16.42, I2 = 45%, P = 0.06, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.45, 95% CI [−0.78 to −0.12], P = 0.08, indicating a statistically significant difference. Nine studies examined the effect of exercise lasting 6 months or more on HbA1c improvement in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 44.71, I2 = 82%, P < 0.001, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.59, 95% CI [−0.94 to −0.25], P = 0.0007 indicating a statistically significant difference.

Fifteen studies investigated the effects of multi-component exercise on fasting blood glucose in patients with T2DM, involving a total of 1,080 participants (Fig. 5). The results of the heterogeneity test showed χ2 = 97.18, P < 0.001, I2 = 86%, indicating substantial heterogeneity among the studies. This high heterogeneity may be attributed to variations in the specific components of the multi-component exercise interventions (e.g., exercise frequency, duration), differences in participant characteristics (e.g., age range, baseline glycemic control), and other factors. The pooled effect size was SMD = −0.53, 95% CI [−0.93 to −0.12], P = 0.01. The forest plot demonstrated that the 95% CI did not intersect with the null line (Fig. 5). These results indicate a significant effect of multi-component exercise intervention on changes in fasting blood glucose levels in patients with T2DM.

Figure 5. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on fasting blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Donyaei et al., 2024; De Oliveira et al., 2012; Banitalebi et al., 2019, 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Newton et al., 2020; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023).

Figure 5

Subgroup analyses were conducted on the included 15 studies. Exercise frequency was divided into groups of less than 3 days per week and 3 days or more per week (including 3 days), showing significant heterogeneity in effect sizes between the two groups (I2 = 84%), indicating a significant moderating effect of exercise frequency on intervention efficacy (Fig. 6A). Three studies investigated the effect of exercise less than 3 days per week on improving fasting blood glucose in T2DM patients. The heterogeneity test results showed χ2 = 3.75, I2 = 47%, P = 0.15, with a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.10, 95% CI [−0.19 to 0.39], P = 0.52, indicating no statistically significant difference. Twelve studies examined the effect of exercising 3 or more days per week on improving fasting blood glucose in T2DM patients. The heterogeneity test results showed χ2 = 73.5, I2 = 85%, P < 0.001, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.74, 95% CI [−1.32 to −0.15], P = 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference. Exercise duration was categorized into less than 3 months and 3 months or more (including 3 months), with significant heterogeneity in effect size differences between the two groups (I2 = 85%), indicating that exercise duration significantly moderates the intervention effects (Fig. 6B). Three studies investigated the effect of exercise lasting less than 3 months on improving fasting blood glucose in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 2.32, I2 = 14%, P = 0.31, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.53, 95% CI [−0.99 to −0.08], P = 0.02, indicating a statistically significant difference. Twelve studies examined the effect of exercise lasting 3 months or more on improving fasting blood glucose in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity test results showed: χ2 = 86.91, I2 = 87%, P < 0.001, with a pooled effect size of SMD = −0.59, 95% CI [−1.06 to −0.13], P = 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference.

Figure 6. Forest plot of the effect of exercise-related regulation on fasting blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (A) exercise frequency (B) exercise duration (Donyaei et al., 2024; De Oliveira et al., 2012; Banitalebi et al., 2019, 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Newton et al., 2020; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023).

Figure 6

Analysis of multi-component exercise intervention on T2DM lipid metabolism

Fifteen studies encompassing 1,196 participants assessed the effects of multi-component exercise on high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in individuals with T2DM (Fig. 7A). Significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies (χ2 = 64.6, P < 0.001, I2 = 78%), and the pooled effect size was substantial (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.21–0.44], P < 0.001) (Fig. 7A). The forest plot demonstrated that the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 7A), indicating that multi-component exercise interventions effectively improve HDL levels in patients with T2DM. Thirteen studies involving 1,137 participants evaluated the impact of multi-component exercise on low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels ((Fig. 7B). Considerable heterogeneity was observed (χ2 = 72.35, P < 0.001, I2 = 83%), with a significant negative pooled effect size (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI [−0.33 to −0.09], P = 0.0007) ((Fig. 7B). The forest plot indicated that the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 7B), suggesting that multi-component exercise has a significant impact on reducing LDL levels in patients with T2DM. Additionally, thirteen studies involving 1,158 participants investigated the effects of multi-component exercise on TG levels (Fig. 7C). High heterogeneity was also evident (χ2 = 73.21, P < 0.001, I2 = 84%), and the pooled effect size indicated a significant improvement (SMD = −0.18, 95% CI [−0.3 to −0.06], P = 0.003) (Fig. 7C). The forest plot showed that the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 7C), confirming that multi-component exercise interventions significantly improve TG levels in patients with T2DM.

Figure 7. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (A) high-density lipoprotein (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Banitalebi et al., 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Lambers et al., 2008; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020); (B) low-density lipoprotein (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020); (C) triglyceride (Banitalebi et al., 2021; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Lambers et al., 2008; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020).

Figure 7

Subgroup analyses of the 15 studies evaluating the effect of multi-component exercise on HDL levels were stratified by exercise duration into less than 6 months and 6 months or more, revealing significant heterogeneity between the groups (I2 = 78%), indicating a substantial moderating effect of exercise duration on intervention outcomes (Fig. 8A). For exercise durations less than 6 months,the heterogeneity test showed no variability (χ2 = 5.04, I2 = 0%, P = 0.83) and a significant pooled effect size (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [0.05–0.49], P = 0.02). For durations of 6 months or more, substantial heterogeneity was observed (χ2 = 59.29, I2 = 93%, P < 0.001) with a significant pooled effect size (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.20–0.48], P < 0.001).

Figure 8. Forest plot of exercise duration regulation on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (A) High density lipoprotein-exercise duration (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Banitalebi et al., 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Lambers et al., 2008; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020); (B) Low density lipoprotein-exercise duration (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020); (C) Triglyceride-exercise duration (Banitalebi et al., 2021; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Sigal et al., 2007; Lambers et al., 2008; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020).

Figure 8

Subgroup analyses of the 13 studies that included LDL as an outcome were also divided by exercise duration, showing significant heterogeneity (I2 = 83%) and indicating that duration significantly modulates the effects of exercise interventions (Fig. 8B). For durations less than 6 months, heterogeneity was negligible (χ2 = 3.47, I2 = 0%, P = 0.84) with a non-significant pooled effect size (SMD = −0.02, 95% CI [−0.26 to 0.22], P = 0.86). For durations of 6 months or more, very high heterogeneity was present (χ2 = 65.87, I2 = 94%, P < 0.001) with a significant pooled effect size (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI [−0.40 to −0.13], P = 0.0001).

Finally, subgroup analyses for the 13 studies assessing the impact of exercise on TG were categorized by duration, showing significant heterogeneity (I2 = 84%) and indicating a significant moderating effect of exercise duration (Fig. 8C). For exercise periods less than 6 months, no significant heterogeneity was observed (χ2 = 2.04, I2 = 0%, P = 0.96), and the pooled effect size was non-significant (SMD = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.31 to 0.16], P = 0.52). For periods of 6 months or more, very high heterogeneity was evident (χ2 = 70.17, I2 = 94%, P < 0.001) with a significant pooled effect size (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI [−0.35 to −0.08], P = 0.002).

Analysis of multi-component exercise intervention on T2DM physical fitness

Four studies reported the effects of multi-component exercise interventions on upper limb strength in individuals with T2DM, with a total of 634 participants (Fig. 9A). Heterogeneity test results: χ2 = 4.77, P = 0.19, I2 = 37%, indicating no significant heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled effect size was: SMD = 0.67, 95% CI [0.51–0.83], P < 0.001 (Fig. 9A). The forest plot showed: the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 9A). Five studies reported the effects of multi-component exercise on lower limb strength in patients with T2DM, with a total of 725 participants (Fig. 9B). Heterogeneity test results: χ2 = 13.94, P = 0.007, I2 = 71%, indicating heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled effect size was: SMD = 0.56, 95% CI [0.10–1.02], P = 0.02 (Fig. 9B). The forest plot showed: the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 9B). The results indicate that multi-component exercise significantly improves both upper and lower limb muscle strength in patients with T2DM.

Figure 9. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on physical fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (A) upper limb strength (Seyedizadeh, Cheragh-Birjandi & Hamedi Nia, 2020; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Lambers et al., 2008; Balducci et al., 2010); (B) lower limb strength (Seyedizadeh, Cheragh-Birjandi & Hamedi Nia, 2020; Sénéchal et al., 2013; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Lambers et al., 2008; Balducci et al., 2010); (C) peak relative oxygen uptake (De Oliveira et al., 2012; Church et al., 2010; Annibalini et al., 2017; Banitalebi et al., 2019; Larose et al., 2010; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Sparks et al., 2013; Sénéchal et al., 2013; Johansen et al., 2017; Newton et al., 2020; Byrkjeland et al., 2015; Kang, Ko & Baek, 2016; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Delevatti et al., 2022); (D) body mass index (BMI) (Szilágyi et al., 2019; Banitalebi et al., 2019; Banitalebi et al., 2021; Annibalini et al., 2017; Kadoglou et al., 2013; Aylin et al., 2009; Sparks et al., 2013; Sénéchal et al., 2013; Johansen et al., 2017; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Sigal et al., 2007; Lambers et al., 2008; Balducci et al., 2010; Stomby et al., 2017; Cai et al., 2023; Jeon et al., 2020).

Figure 9

Fifteen studies reported the effects of multi-component exercise interventions on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in patients with T2DM, involving a total of 1,380 participants (Fig. 9C). Heterogeneity test results: χ2 = 78.74, P < 0.001, I2 = 82%, indicating significant heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled effect size was: SMD = 0.62, 95% CI [0.31–0.93], P < 0.001 (Fig. 9C). The forest plot showed: the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 9C). The results indicate that multi-component exercise significantly increases the level of VO2peak in patients with T2DM.

Sixteen studies reported the effects of multi-component exercise interventions on BMI in patients with T2DM, involving a total of 1,405 participants (Fig. 9D). Heterogeneity test results: χ2 = 78.05, P < 0.001, I2 = 81%, indicating heterogeneity among the 16 studies on BMI. The pooled effect size was: SMD = −0.38, 95% CI [−0.67 to −0.09], P = 0.01 (Fig. 9D). The forest plot showed: the 95% CI did not intersect with the line of no effect (Fig. 9D). The results indicate that multi-component exercise significantly reduces the BMI index in patients with T2DM.

Analysis of multi-component exercise intervention on overall cognitive function in patients with T2DM

Four studies involving 586 participants explored the impact on overall cognitive function,showing moderate heterogeneity (χ2 = 5.12, P = 0.1, I2 = 41%), and a combined effect size of SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.18–0.50], P < 0.001 (Fig. 10), with the forest plot indicating a significant effect (Fig. 10).

Figure 10. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on overall cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Callisaya et al., 2017; Martínez-Velilla et al., 2021; Ghodrati et al., 2023; Espeland et al., 2017).

Figure 10

Analysis of the impact of multi-component exercise on the quality of life in patients with T2DM

Five studies used the SF-36 scale to assess the impact of multi-component exercise on the quality of life in patients with T2DM, with a total of 220 participants. In terms of vitality, no significant heterogeneity was observed between the studies (X2 = 6.12, P = 0.19, I2 = 35%). The combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11A) indicated that multi-component exercise significantly improved vitality in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI [0.09–0.64], P = 0.009). Regarding emotional role functioning, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11B) showed that multi-component exercise had no significant effect on emotional role functioning in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.41 to 0.58], P = 0.73), with significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 11.50, P = 0.02, I2 = 65%).

Figure 11. Forest plot of the effect of multi-component exercise on the quality of Life of patients with T2DM: (A) vitality; (B) emotional role functioning; (C) social functioning; (D) physical functioning; (E) physical role functioning; (F) bodily pain; (G) mental health; (H) general health (Jamshidpour, Bahrpeyma & Khatami, 2020; Aylin et al., 2009; Macdonald et al., 2021; Tomas-Carus et al., 2016; Lambers et al., 2008).

Figure 11

For social functioning, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11C) showed that multi-component exercise did not significantly improve social functioning in patients with T2DM (SMD = −0.11, 95% CI [−0.38 to 0.16], P = 0.43), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 2.57, P = 0.63, I2 = 0%). In terms of physical functioning, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11D) indicated that multi-component exercise effectively improved physical functioning patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.20–0.75], P = 0.007), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 2.81, P = 0.59, I2 = 0%).

For physical role functioning, the forest plot results (Fig. 11E) showed that multi-component exercise had no significant effect on physical role functioning in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI [−0.01 to 0.54], P = 0.06), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 3.05, P = 0.55, I2 = 0%). In terms of bodily pain, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11F) showed that multi-component exercise did not significantly affect bodily pain in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI [−0.05 to 0.49], P = 0.11), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 2.16, P = 0.71, I2 = 0%).

Regarding mental health, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11G) indicated that multi-component exercise significantly improved mental health levels in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.07–0.63], P = 0.01), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 6.40, P = 0.17, I2 = 37%). For general health perception, the combined results from the forest plot (Fig. 11H) showed that multi-component exercise effectively improved general health perception in patients with T2DM (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.06–0.61], P = 0.02), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies (X2 = 1.77, P = 0.78, I2 = 0%).

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

In sensitivity analysis,the combined results of random-effects meta-analysis were consistent with those of fixed-effects meta-analysis or when studies with the lowest quality assessment score were excluded, indicating the stability of the pooled effects (SMD) of multi-component exercise intervention on HbA1c, blood glucose, metabolic health,cognitive function, body composition, physical function, and quality of life. Due to the complexity of the included study outcomes, funnel plots and analyses are typically conducted for meta-analyses involving more than 10 studies to explore publication bias. As shown in Fig. 12, all included studies exhibited a relatively symmetrical distribution. Subsequently, Egger’s test was performed for the study outcome indicator HbA1c, yielding P = 0.137 > 0.05 (Table 3), indicating no significant publication bias. Only the examination results for HbA1c are presented here; detailed results for other study outcome indicators are provided in Tables 4 through 9.

Figure 12. Funnel plot for HbA1c.

Figure 12

The symmetrical distribution of studies around the pooled effect estimate (dashed vertical line) suggests an absence of significant publication bias.

Table 3. Egger test results for HbA1c.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope −0.1521911 0.1859967 −0.82 0.425 [−0.54461 to 0.24023]
Bias −1.215678 0.7785508 −1.56 0.137 [−2.85828 to 0.42692]

Table 4. Egger test results for fasting blood glucose.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope 0.2858861 0.2578351 1.11 0.288 [−0.27113 to 0.84291]
Bias −2.216822 1.058392 −2.09 0.056 [−4.50334 to 0.69694]

Table 9. Egger test results for body mass index.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope 0.0188324 0.2237525 0.08 0.934 [−0.46107 to 0.49873]
Bias −1.379875 1.020133 −1.35 0.198 [−3.56784 to 0.80809]

Table 5. Egger test results for high density lipoprotein.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope 0.1566008 0.2329509 0.67 0.513 [−0.34666 to 0.65986]
Bias 0.8918643 1.011846 0.88 0.394 [−1.29409 to 3.07782]

Table 6. Egger test results for low density lipoprotein.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope −0.0539419 0.2712884 −0.20 0.846 [−0.65104 to 0.54316]
Bias −0.8654674 1.235584 −0.70 0.498 [−3.58497 to 1.85403]

Table 7. Egger test results for triglyceride.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope 0.1187733 0.2582417 0.46 0.655 [−0.44961 to 0.68716]
Bias −1.674407 1.187914 −1.41 0.186 [−4.28899 to 0.94017]

Table 8. Egger test results for peak relative oxygen uptake.

Std_Eff Cofe Std.Eff t p > |t| (95% Conf. Interval)
Slope 0.2877757 0.2536833 1.13 0.277 [−0.26027 to 0.83582]
Bias 1.165016 1.162796 1.00 0.335 [−1.34705 to 3.67708]

Discussion

Analysis of the overall effect of multi-component exercise on T2DM HbA1c and lipid metabolism

In patients with T2DM, as much as 50% to 80% of mortality is attributed to cardiovascular diseases, a proportion significantly higher than in people not living with T2DM. Studies indicate that long-term maintenance of elevated HbA1c levels is one of the key factors contributing to the development of cardiovascular diseases (Moliner-Urdiales et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2020). Additionally, a decrease in HbA1c levels is significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality inpatients with T2DM (Wu et al., 2021). Furthermore, exercise is widely acknowledged to effectively reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with T2DM. Multi-component exercise, as one of the non-pharmacological approaches to reducing or preventing the risk of mortality in T2DM, has been investigated for its differences with pharmacological treatments. Umpierrez et al. (2014) conducted a 52-week pharmacological treatment for T2DM, reporting that multi-component exercise had similar efficacy to metformin in reducing HbA1c levels. This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant reduction in HbA1c levels with multi-component exercise. To explore the differences between multi-component exercise and single exercise modalities in improving HbA1c levels in patients with T2DM, Church’s randomized controlled trial (Church et al., 2010) compared the effects of multi-component exercise and single exercises (resistance exercise, aerobic exercise) on HbA1c with the same weekly exercise time. This controlled for the impact of time differences on outcomes, showing that multi-component exercise had a 0.19% greater reduction in HbA1c compared to resistance exercise and a 0.11% greater reduction compared to aerobic exercise. A review suggests that this might be a result of increased muscle mass and upregulation of glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT-4) (Saeidi et al., 2021). Both aerobic and resistance exercises can promote skeletal muscle contraction, leading to an increase in cytoplasmic calcium ions, which, through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), translocate GLUT-4 to the cell membrane, thereby enhancing glucose uptake (Richter, 2021). In addition, resistance training has been shown to promote glycogen storage, while aerobic exercise enhances mitochondrial function and improves glucose utilization. These effects together help improve blood glucose control by reducing insulin resistance and enhancing glucose metabolism. Multi-component exercise may produce better outcomes in HbA1c intervention compared to single exercise modalities.

Given the substantial differences in intervention duration and frequency among the 19 included studies, this study conducted subgroup analyses and found that interventions lasting more than 6 months and involving exercise frequencies exceeding three times per week yielded more significant improvements in HbA1c levels. Sigal et al.’s (2007) study also indicated that multi-component exercise had twice the impact on HbA1c compared to aerobic exercise. This may be attributed to the reduction in overall sedentary time in older adults due to frequent exercise, which continuously induces exercise-related factors. Long-term adherence to exercise promotes muscular and skeletal health, enhances cardiorespiratory fitness, and improves metabolic efficiency. Additionally, the volume difference may be more effective than solely activating additional muscle groups (Houmard et al., 2004; Ishiguro et al., 2016). Over time, these sustained physiological changes may gradually improve blood glucose control, with exercise duration serving as a key determinant in enhancing insulin sensitivity in patients with T2DM (Li et al., 2012). Furthermore, long-term exercise may exert a continuous positive impact on insulin sensitivity. Increased insulin sensitivity helps lower blood glucose levels, thus improving HbA1c levels.

T2DM often coexists with abnormalities in lipid metabolism, manifested by decreased HDL levels and increased LDL and TG levels (Gong et al., 2016). This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant impact of multi-component exercise on improving HDL, LDL, and TG levels in patients with T2DM. Due to the integration of various exercise modalities, multi-component exercise differs from single exercise modalities in improving lipid metabolism patients with T2DM. Sigal et al. (2007), through a randomized controlled trial, confirmed that multi-component exercise intervention increased HDL by 0.04 mmol/L, decreased LDL by 0.11 mmol/L, and decreased TG by 0.26 mmol/L, whereas aerobic exercise intervention increased HDL by 0.01 mmol/L, decreased LDL by 0.16 mmol/L, and decreased TG by 0.09 mmol/L. Aerobic exercise primarily improves lipid composition by enhancing the activity of lipid metabolism-related enzymes (Egli et al., 2013). Lipoprotein lipase promotes the hydrolysis of TG, and prolonged aerobic exercise accelerates the oxidative breakdown of fats for energy substrates (Earnest et al., 2013). In multi-component exercise, not only does aerobic exercise play a role in T2DM intervention, but it also activates resistance intervention mechanisms. Resistance exercise regulates lipid metabolism processes by increasing the activity of lipid transport proteins (Augusto Libardi et al., 2012). Multi-component exercise may enhance the intervention effects on T2DM lipid metabolism by the interaction of various intervention mechanisms of different exercise modalities.

Given the significant heterogeneity in the intervention effects of multi-component exercise on T2DM lipid metabolism, subgroup analysis of the exercise duration in the included studies revealed that exercise duration was one of the sources of heterogeneity in multi-component exercise intervention in lipid metabolism. Subgroup analysis results suggest that an exercise duration of ≥6 months significantly improves lipid metabolism levels in patients with T2DM, possibly due to increased adaptability of T2DM to intervention mechanisms based on the interaction of multiple intervention mechanisms in multi-component exercise in improving lipid metabolism.

Analysis of the overall effect of multi-component exercise on physical fitness in patients with T2DM

Research has found that the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with T2DM is as high as 15.7%, and the risk of sarcopenia in individuals with T2DM is 2–4 times higher than in normal elderly individuals (Sarodnik et al., 2018). The coexistence of T2DM and sarcopenia can lead to adverse outcomes such as decreased muscle strength and functional impairment in patients (Anagnostis et al., 2020). Regarding the improvement of physical fitness in T2DM, this meta-analysis demonstrates that multi-component exercise promotes an increase in upper and lower limb muscle strength and peak oxygen consumption to improve physical function in patients with T2DM. The pooled results are statistically significant.

Multi-component exercise optimizes mitochondrial function in patients with T2DM, increases ATP production, and enhances oxygen utilization efficiency, thereby improving energy metabolism and meeting the high energy demands of muscle cells during exercise (Szendroedi, Phielix & Roden, 2011). Consequently, multi-component exercise increases peak oxygen consumption in patients with T2DM, improving cardiorespiratory function, which shares similar mechanisms with aerobic exercise in improving cardiorespiratory function in T2DM. However, in terms of intervention effects, Church et al.’s (2010) randomized controlled trial found that multi-component exercise intervention significantly increased peak oxygen consumption in patients, with an average increase of 1 ml/kg/min, while traditional aerobic exercise increased it by 0.5 ml/kg/min. This data suggests that multi-component exercise may be more effective than single exercise modalities in improving cardiorespiratory function. This study confirms the significant impact of multi-component exercise on improving upper and lower limb muscle strength in patients with T2DM. An experiment by Lambers et al. (2008) found that compared to single aerobic exercise, multi-component exercise not only did not improve upper limb strength but also decreased it by 0.3 kg. Multi-component exercise improved lower limb strength by 15.1 kg compared to aerobic exercise alone, while aerobic exercise alone increased lower limb strength by only 0.8 kg. This may be attributed to the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway by resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise (Wu & Ballantyne, 2017), increasing muscle oxygen consumption, increasing muscle capillaries, inducing muscle protein synthesis, optimizing skeletal muscle mass and function. Additionally, microRNAs play a crucial role in regulating mitochondrial function and muscle health, and aerobic exercise can improve mitochondrial dysfunction by regulating microRNA expression, thereby affecting muscle strength and endurance in T2DM (Long et al., 2023). Compared to single exercise modalities (aerobic exercise, resistance exercise), multi-component exercise provides an efficient strategy for improving physical fitness in patients with T2DM by integrating the intervention effects of different exercise modalities on muscle strength.

Analysis of the overall effect of multi-component exercise on cognitive function in patients with T2DM

Long-term hyperglycemia can impair both brain function and peripheral nerves, thus affecting cognitive function (Alosco et al., 2012). Studies have confirmed (Kotsani et al., 2018) that patients with T2DM are at a higher risk of cognitive impairment compared to healthy individuals, and this risk is more significant in elderly patients with T2DM. Therefore, effective measures should be taken to delay and prevent the decline in cognitive function associated with T2DM. This meta-analysis indicates that multi-component exercise significantly improves overall cognitive function in patients with T2DM, with pooled results being statistically significant. A review suggests that growth factors, neuroplasticity, vascular function, among others, form the basis for exercise-induced improvements in cognitive function (Quigley, Mackay-Lyons & Eskes, 2020). Compared to single exercise modalities, multi-component exercise may improve overall cognitive function in T2DM by optimizing multiple brain mechanisms. Martínez-Velilla et al. (2021) demonstrated a significant improvement in overall cognitive function in T2D through a multi-component exercise regimen combining aerobic, resistance, and balance exercises. Aerobic exercise (Lan et al., 2018) can increase the levels of β-HB, inducing the transcription of neurotrophic factors, further promoting hippocampal neuroplasticity. Additionally, aerobic exercise can promote the release of anti-inflammatory substances from muscles (Hopps, Canino & Caimi, 2011), reducing the function of pro-inflammatory factors and thus improving cognitive function in T2DM. In contrast, resistance exercise tends to increase IGF-1 levels (Tsai et al., 2018), further promoting metabolic and functional improvements in the body. Balance ability has been shown to have a positive relationship with cognitive function (Meunier et al., 2021), and balance training can affect cognitive function improvement by improving balance in patients with T2DM. In summary, multi-component exercise, by integrating various intervention mechanisms from different exercise modalities, may maximize improvements in cognitive function in patients with T2DM.

Analysis of the overall effect of multi-component exercise on quality of life in patients with T2DM

This study further explored the impact of multi-component exercise on the quality of life in patients with T2DM. The results indicate that multi-component exercise significantly improves vitality, mental health, physical functioning, and overall health perception in patients with T2DM. The improvement in quality of life is mediated by changes in body composition and is associated with improvements in blood glucose levels (Cai et al., 2017). Regular exercise enhances insulin sensitivity and reduces inflammation, contributing to better physical health and a reduction in diabetes-related complications (Zaki, Sharma & Vats, 2024; Annibalini et al., 2017). Mechanistically, aerobic exercise increases endorphin levels and reduces stress hormones, thereby improving mood and mental health (Ren & Xiao, 2023). On the other hand, resistance training enhances muscle strength and endurance, improving physical functioning and reducing fatigue (Ren & Xiao, 2023; Gacesa, Klasnja & Grujic, 2013). These physiological changes collectively contribute to the improvement of quality of life. Additionally, multi-component exercise, by combining various forms of exercise (aerobic, resistance), involves more tissues, organs, and systems, potentially leading to greater improvements in T2DM patients’ quality of life. However, this review also indicates that multi-component exercise did not have a significant impact on emotional role functioning, social functioning, physical role functioning, or pain perception. This may be attributed to factors such as the exercise environment, duration, types of multi-component exercise, and the quality and quantity of the relevant studies. Future research can further explore these aspects to better understand the comprehensive effects of multi-component exercise on the quality of life in patients with T2DM.

Moreover, some studies indicate that multi-component exercise not only outperforms single-mode exercise in improving HbA1c levels and inflammatory markers in patients with T2DM (Schwingshackl et al., 2014), but its diversified formats also enhance the intervention’s appeal and patient engagement (Batrakoulis et al., 2021). This is crucial for ensuring long-term exercise adherence. Additionally, the core components of multi-component exercise (such as walking, bodyweight resistance training, balance exercises, and flexibility activities) generally have low requirements for space and equipment, making them highly accessible and feasible. This allows for flexible implementation and promotion of such interventions across various settings, including community health programs, home self-management plans, and clinical pathways in hospitals or rehabilitation centers. The combination of higher adherence and implementation feasibility ensures that multi-component exercise can continue to deliver its positive health benefits—such as improvements in metabolism, physical fitness, and cognitive function—in real-world environments.

However, despite the benefits of multi-component exercise in enhancing adherence, several challenges remain, such as time constraints, physical discomfort caused by T2DM-related complications, and lack of motivation. To ensure the practical feasibility and sustained benefits of multi-component exercise, future strategies should focus on simplifying home-based exercise routines, developing personalized programs with gradual progression, providing professional guidance, utilizing group-based social support, and leveraging technological tools. Overcoming these barriers is crucial for translating strong evidence into meaningful improvements in the daily lives of patients with T2DM.

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the PRISMA statement checklist, yet it still has some limitations. (1) The literature search did not include unpublished documents, and some articles could not be included due to incomplete outcome data, which may affect the comprehensiveness of the information; (2) Some data in the study were merged using SMD due to inconsistencies in units or measuring instruments, which may affect the precision of the results; (3) Some studies did not implement blinding or did not specify whether blinding allocation methods were used, which could increase the risk of bias; (4) Due to significant variations in the reporting of exercise intensity across the included studies, subgroup analysis could not be performed. This limitation may affect the generalizability of the results and obscure the potential impact of exercise intensity on the effectiveness of multi-component exercise interventions.

Implications for future research

To clarify the differential benefits of different exercise intensities for patients with T2DM, future studies should conduct standardized RCTs to investigate the ideal exercise intensity and combination of multi-component exercises, while standardizing the reporting of exercise intensity using consistent metrics. Additionally, studies should extend the follow-up period to assess the long-term effects of multi-component exercise and track exercise adherence. Furthermore, subgroup analyses should be conducted for patients with T2DM who have different disease durations, ages, and complications, and personalized exercise prescriptions should be developed.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that multi-component exercise intervention effectively improves glycemic and lipid metabolism, physical fitness, cognitive function and quality of life in patients with T2DM, indicating its positive impact and practical value for patients with T2DM. Due to the unclear description of exercise intensity in the included literature, multi-component exercise mainly consisted of aerobic combined with resistance exercises. Therefore, this study did not conduct subgroup analysis on exercise intensity and mode in the included literature.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Contribution to Existing Knowledge.
peerj-13-20146-s001.docx (13.7KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20146/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. PRISMA 2010 checklist.
peerj-13-20146-s002.docx (30.6KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20146/supp-2

Funding Statement

This study was not supported by any funding projects. The Shandong Sports Science Research Institute supported the APC and provided academic resources for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zhiyuan Sun conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Haiqing Zeng conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Hualei Liu analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Mengqi Hu performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Xuewen Tian performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Dewei Mao analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Rui Zhang analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data was not generated in this is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

References

  • Ahmad et al. (2020).Ahmad I, Verma S, Noohu MM, Shareef MY, Hussain ME. Sensorimotor and gait training improves proprioception, nerve function, and muscular activation in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomized control trial. Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions. 2020;20:234–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Mhanna et al. (2023).Al-Mhanna SB, Rocha-Rodriguesc S, Mohamed M, Batrakoulis A, Aldhahi MI, Afolabi HA, Yagin FH, Alhussain MH, Gülü M, Abubakar BD, Ghazali WSW, Alghannam AF, Badicu G. Effects of combined aerobic exercise and diet on cardiometabolic health in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023;15:165. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00766-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alosco et al. (2012).Alosco ML, Spitznagel MB, Van Dulmen M, Raz N, Cohen R, Sweet LH, Colbert LH, Josephson R, Hughes J, Rosneck J, Gunstad J. The additive effects of type-2 diabetes on cognitive function in older adults with heart failure. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2012;2012(4):348054. doi: 10.1155/2012/348054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anagnostis et al. (2020).Anagnostis P, Gkekas NK, Achilla C, Pananastasiou G, Taouxidou P, Mitsiou M, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E, Goulis DG. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Calcified Tissue International. 2020;107(5):453–463. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00742-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Annibalini et al. (2017).Annibalini G, Lucertini F, Agostini D, Vallorani L, Gioacchini A, Barbieri E, Guescini M, Casadei L, Passalia A, Del Sal M, Piccoli G, Andreani M, Federici A, Stocchi V. Concurrent aerobic and resistance training has anti-inflammatory effects and increases both plasma and leukocyte levels of IGF-1 in late middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2017;2017:3937842. doi: 10.1155/2017/3937842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Augusto Libardi et al. (2012).Augusto Libardi C, Bonganha V, Soares Conceição M, Vergínia De Souza G, Fernandes Bernardes C, Secolin R, Aparecida Madruga V, Traina Chacon-Mikahil MP. The periodized resistance training promotes similar changes in lipid profile in middle-aged men and women. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2012;52:286–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aylin et al. (2009).Aylin K, Arzu D, Sabri S, Handan TE, Ridvan A. The effect of combined resistance and home-based walking exercise in type 2 diabetes patients. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2009;29:159–165. doi: 10.4103/0973-3930.57347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balducci et al. (2007).Balducci S, Alessi E, Cardelli P, Cavallo S, Fallucca F, Pugliese G. Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis: response to Snowling and Hopkins. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):e25. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balducci et al. (2010).Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, De Feo P, Cavallo S, Cardelli P, Fallucca S, Alessi E, Fallucca F, Pugliese G. Effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial: the Italian diabetes and exercise study (IDES) Archives of Internal Medicine. 2010;170(20):1794–1803. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Banitalebi et al. (2019).Banitalebi E, Kazemi A, Faramarzi M, Nasiri S, Haghighi MM. Effects of sprint interval or combined aerobic and resistance training on myokines in overweight women with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Life Sciences. 2019;217(6):101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.11.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Banitalebi et al. (2021).Banitalebi E, Mardaniyan Ghahfarrokhi M, Faramarzi M, Earnest CP. Sprint interval training vs. combined aerobic + resistance training in overweight women with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2021;61(5):712–724. doi: 10.23736/s0022-4707.20.11105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Batrakoulis et al. (2021).Batrakoulis A, Tsimeas P, Deli CK, Vlachopoulos D, Ubago-Guisado E, Poulios A, Chatzinikolaou A, Draganidis D, Papanikolaou K, Georgakouli K, Batsilas D, Gracia-Marco L, Jamurtas AZ, Fatouros I. Hybrid neuromuscular training promotes musculoskeletal adaptations in inactive overweight and obese women: a training-detraining randomized controlled trial. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021;39(5):503–512. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1830543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Byrkjeland et al. (2015).Byrkjeland R, Njerve IU, Anderssen S, Arnesen H, Seljeflot I, Solheim S. Effects of exercise training on HbA1c and VO2peak in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a randomised clinical trial. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2015;12(5):325–333. doi: 10.1177/1479164115590552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai et al. (2017).Cai H, Li G, Zhang P, Xu D, Chen L. Effect of exercise on the quality of life in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. 2017;26(3):515–530. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1481-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai et al. (2023).Cai Y, Wang S, Wang S, Gu Q, Huang Y, Li J, Wang R, Liu X. Effects of Yijinjing combined with resistance training on body fat distribution and hepatic lipids in middle-aged and older people with prediabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Experimental Gerontology. 2023;179(3):112250. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Callisaya et al. (2017).Callisaya ML, Daly RM, Sharman JE, Bruce D, Davis TME, Greenaway T, Nolan M, Beare R, Schultz MG, Phan T, Blizzard LC, Srikanth VK. Feasibility of a multi-modal exercise program on cognition in older adults with type 2 diabetes—a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17:237. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0635-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Care (2018).Care D. 4. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Supplement_1):S38–s50. doi: 10.2337/dc18-s004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Church et al. (2010).Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, Johannsen N, Johnson W, Kramer K, Mikus CR, Myers V, Nauta M, Rodarte RQ, Sparks L, Thompson A, Earnest CP. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253–2262. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • De Oliveira et al. (2012).De Oliveira VN, Bessa A, Jorge ML, Oliveira RJ, De Mello MT, De Agostini GG, Jorge PT, Espindola FS. The effect of different training programs on antioxidant status, oxidative stress, and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2012;37(2):334–344. doi: 10.1139/h2012-004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Delevatti et al. (2020).Delevatti RS, Kanitz AC, Bracht CG, Lisboa SDC, Marson EC, Reichert T, Bones V, Kruel LFM. Effects of 2 models of aquatic exercise training on cardiorespiratory responses of patients with type 2 diabetes: the diabetes and aquatic training study-a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2020;17(11):1091–1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Delevatti et al. (2022).Delevatti RS, Reichert T, Bracht CG, Lisboa SDC, Marson EC, Costa RR, Kanitz AC, Bones V, Stein R, Kruel LFM. Aquatic Aerobic and combined training in management of type 2 diabetes: the diabetes and aquatic training study (DATS): a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2022;19(8):578–587. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Donyaei et al. (2024).Donyaei A, Kiani E, Bahrololoum H, Moser O. Effect of combined aerobic-resistance training and subsequent detraining on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and depression in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetic Medicine. 2024;41(3):e15188. doi: 10.1111/dme.15188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Earnest et al. (2013).Earnest CP, Artero EG, Sui X, Lee DC, Church TS, Blair SN. Maximal estimated cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiometabolic risk factors, and metabolic syndrome in the aerobics center longitudinal study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2013;88(3):259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Egli et al. (2013).Egli L, Lecoultre V, Theytaz F, Campos V, Hodson L, Schneiter P, Mittendorfer B, Patterson BW, Fielding BA, Gerber PA, Giusti V, Berneis K, Tappy L. Exercise prevents fructose-induced hypertriglyceridemia in healthy young subjects. Diabetes. 2013;62(7):2259–2265. doi: 10.2337/db12-1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espeland et al. (2017).Espeland MA, Lipska K, Miller ME, Rushing J, Cohen RA, Verghese J, Mcdermott MM, King AC, Strotmeyer ES, Blair SN, Pahor M, Reid K, Demons J, Kritchevsky SB. Effects of physical activity intervention on physical and cognitive function in sedentary adults with and without diabetes. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2017;72:861–866. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gacesa, Klasnja & Grujic (2013).Gacesa JZ, Klasnja AV, Grujic NG. Changes in strength, endurance, and fatigue during a resistance-training program for the triceps brachii muscle. Journal of Athletic Training. 2013;48(6):804–809. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators (2023).GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203–234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghodrati et al. (2023).Ghodrati N, Haghighi AH, Hosseini Kakhak SA, Abbasian S, Goldfield GS. Effect of combined exercise training on physical and cognitive function in women with type 2 diabetes. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2023;47(2):162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gong et al. (2016).Gong J, Fang K, Dong H, Wang D, Hu M, Lu F. Effect of fenugreek on hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidemia in diabetes and prediabetes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2016;194(1):260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall et al. (2020).Hall KS, Hyde ET, Bassett DR, Carlson SA, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, Evenson KR, Galuska DA, Kraus WE, Lee IM, Matthews CE, Omura JD, Paluch AE, Thomas WI, Fulton JE. Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020;17:78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00978-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hopps, Canino & Caimi (2011).Hopps E, Canino B, Caimi G. Effects of exercise on inflammation markers in type 2 diabetic subjects. Acta Diabetologica. 2011;48(3):183–189. doi: 10.1007/s00592-011-0278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Houmard et al. (2004).Houmard JA, Tanner CJ, Slentz CA, Duscha BD, Mccartney JS, Kraus WE. Effect of the volume and intensity of exercise training on insulin sensitivity. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004;96(1):101–106. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00707.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ishiguro et al. (2016).Ishiguro H, Kodama S, Horikawa C, Fujihara K, Hirose AS, Hirasawa R, Yachi Y, Ohara N, Shimano H, Hanyu O, Sone H. In search of the ideal resistance training program to improve glycemic control and its indication for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2016;46:67–77. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0379-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jamshidpour, Bahrpeyma & Khatami (2020).Jamshidpour B, Bahrpeyma F, Khatami MR. The effect of aerobic and resistance exercise training on the health related quality of life, physical function, and muscle strength among hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2020;24(2):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeon et al. (2020).Jeon YK, Kim SS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Park JJ, Cho YS, Joung SH, Kim JR, Kim BH, Song SH, Kim IJ, Kim YK, Kim YB. Combined Aerobic and resistance exercise training reduces circulating apolipoprotein J levels and improves insulin resistance in postmenopausal diabetic women. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal. 2020;44(1):103–112. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johansen et al. (2017).Johansen MY, Macdonald CS, Hansen KB, Karstoft K, Christensen R, Pedersen M, Hansen LS, Zacho M, Wedell-Neergaard AS, Nielsen ST, Iepsen UW, Langberg H, Vaag AA, Pedersen BK, Ried-Larsen M. Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(7):637–646. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.10169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kadoglou et al. (2013).Kadoglou NP, Fotiadis G, Kapelouzou A, Kostakis A, Liapis CD, Vrabas IS. The differential anti-inflammatory effects of exercise modalities and their association with early carotid atherosclerosis progression in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. 2013;30(2):e41. doi: 10.1111/dme.12055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kang, Ko & Baek (2016).Kang SJ, Ko KJ, Baek UH. Effects of 12 weeks combined aerobic and resistance exercise on heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2016;28(7):2088–2093. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Knuiman, Hopman & Mensink (2015).Knuiman P, Hopman MT, Mensink M. Glycogen availability and skeletal muscle adaptations with endurance and resistance exercise. Nutrition & Metabolism. 2015;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s12986-015-0055-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kotsani et al. (2018).Kotsani M, Chatziadamidou T, Economides D, Benetos A. Higher prevalence and earlier appearance of geriatric phenotypes in old adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018;135(5):206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lambers et al. (2008).Lambers S, Van Laethem C, Van Acker K, Calders P. Influence of combined exercise training on indices of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2008;22(6):483–492. doi: 10.1177/0269215508084582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lan et al. (2018).Lan Y, Huang Z, Jiang Y, Zhou X, Zhang J, Zhang D, Wang B, Hou G. Strength exercise weakens aerobic exercise-induced cognitive improvements in rats. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Larose et al. (2010).Larose J, Sigal RJ, Boulé NG, Wells GA, Prud’homme D, Fortier MS, Reid RD, Tulloch H, Coyle D, Phillips P, Jennings A, Khandwala F, Kenny GP. Effect of exercise training on physical fitness in type II diabetes mellitus. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2010;42(8):1439–1447. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181d322dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2012).Li J, Zhang W, Guo Q, Liu X, Zhang Q, Dong R, Dou H, Shi J, Wang J, Yu D. Duration of exercise as a key determinant of improvement in insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes patients. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2012;227(4):289–296. doi: 10.1620/tjem.227.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2023).Lin X, Qu J, Yin L, Wang R, Wang X. Aerobic exercise-induced decrease of chemerin improved glucose and lipid metabolism and fatty liver of diabetes mice through key metabolism enzymes and proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 2023;1868(12):159409. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2023.159409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Long et al. (2023).Long YF, Chow SK, Cui C, Wong RMY, Zhang N, Qin L, Law SW, Cheung WH. Does exercise influence skeletal muscle by modulating mitochondrial functions via regulating MicroRNAs? A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews. 2023;91(2):102048. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macdonald et al. (2021).Macdonald CS, Nielsen SM, Bjørner J, Johansen MY, Christensen R, Vaag A, Lieberman DE, Pedersen BK, Langberg H, Ried-Larsen M, Midtgaard J. One-year intensive lifestyle intervention and improvements in health-related quality of life and mental health in persons with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of the U-TURN randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 2021;9(1):e001840. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez-Velilla et al. (2021).Martínez-Velilla N, Valenzuela PL, Sáez De Asteasu ML, Zambom-Ferraresi F, Ramírez-Vélez R, García-Hermoso A, Librero-López J, Gorricho J, Pérez FE, Lucia A, Izquierdo M. Effects of a tailored exercise intervention in acutely hospitalized oldest old diabetic adults: an ancillary analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2021;106(2):e899–e906. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mcmillan et al. (2018).Mcmillan JM, Mele BS, Hogan DB, Leung AA. Impact of pharmacological treatment of diabetes mellitus on dementia risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 2018;6(1):e000563. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meunier et al. (2021).Meunier CC, Smit E, Fitzpatrick AL, Odden MC. Balance and cognitive decline in older adults in the cardiovascular health study. Age and Ageing. 2021;50(4):1342–1348. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moher et al. (2009).Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moliner-Urdiales et al. (2013).Moliner-Urdiales D, Artero EG, Lee DC, España-Romero V, Sui X, Blair SN. Body adiposity index and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Obesity. 2013;21(9):1870–1876. doi: 10.1002/oby.20399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers et al. (2013).Myers VH, Mcvay MA, Brashear MM, Johannsen NM, Swift DL, Kramer K, Harris MN, Johnson WD, Earnest CP, Church TS. Exercise training and quality of life in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1884–1890. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newton et al. (2020).Newton RL, Jr, Johnson WD, Larrivee S, Hendrick C, Harris M, Johannsen NM, Swift DL, Hsia DS, Church TS. A randomized community-based exercise training trial in african american men: aerobic plus resistance training and insulin sensitivity in African American Men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2020;52(2):408–416. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Okamoto, Masuhara & Ikuta (2013).Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Low-intensity resistance training after high-intensity resistance training can prevent the increase of central arterial stiffness. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;34(05):385–390. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pedroso et al. (2021).Pedroso RV, Lima-Silva AE, Tarachuque PE, Fraga FJ, Stein AM. Efficacy of physical exercise on cortical activity modulation in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021;102(12):2393–2401. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pugliese et al. (2023).Pugliese NR, Pieroni A, De Biase N, Di Fiore V, Nesti L, Agostoni P, Dini FL. Impact of diabetes on cardiopulmonary function: the added value of a combined cardiopulmonary and echocardiography stress test. Heart Failure Reviews. 2023;28(3):645–655. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, Mackay-Lyons & Eskes (2020).Quigley A, Mackay-Lyons M, Eskes G. Effects of exercise on cognitive performance in older adults: a narrative review of the evidence, possible biological mechanisms, and recommendations for exercise prescription. Journal of Aging Research. 2020;2020(48):1407896. doi: 10.1155/2020/1407896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raveendran, Chacko & Pappachan (2018).Raveendran AV, Chacko EC, Pappachan JM. Non-pharmacological treatment options in the management of diabetes mellitus. European Endocrinology. 2018;14:31–39. doi: 10.17925/EE.2018.14.2.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reid et al. (2010).Reid RD, Tulloch HE, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Fortier M, Mcdonnell L, Wells GA, Boulé NG, Phillips P, Coyle D. Effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or both, on patient-reported health status and well-being in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):632–640. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1631-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ren & Xiao (2023).Ren J, Xiao H. Exercise for mental well-being: exploring neurobiological advances and intervention effects in depression. Life. 2023;13(7):1505. doi: 10.3390/life13071505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Richter (2021).Richter EA. Is GLUT4 translocation the answer to exercise-stimulated muscle glucose uptake? American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021;320(2):E240–e243. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00503.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saeidi et al. (2021).Saeidi A, Soltani M, Daraei A, Nohbaradar H, Haghighi MM, Khosravi N, Johnson KE, Laher I, Hackney AC, Vandusseldorp TA, Zouhal H. The effects of aerobic-resistance training and broccoli supplementation on plasma dectin-1 and insulin resistance in males with type 2 diabetes. Nutrients. 2021;13:3144. doi: 10.3390/nu13093144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarodnik et al. (2018).Sarodnik C, Bours SPG, Schaper NC, Van Den Bergh JP, Van Geel T. The risks of sarcopenia, falls and fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Maturitas. 2018;109(3):70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwingshackl et al. (2014).Schwingshackl L, Missbach B, Dias S, König J, Hoffmann G. Impact of different training modalities on glycaemic control and blood lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2014;57(9):1789–1797. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3303-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sénéchal et al. (2013).Sénéchal M, Swift DL, Johannsen NM, Blair SN, Earnest CP, Lavie CJ, Church TS. Changes in body fat distribution and fitness are associated with changes in hemoglobin A1c after 9 months of exercise training: results from the HART-D study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2843–2849. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seyedizadeh, Cheragh-Birjandi & Hamedi Nia (2020).Seyedizadeh SH, Cheragh-Birjandi S, Hamedi Nia MR. The effects of combined exercise training (Resistance-Aerobic) on Serum Kinesin and physical function in type 2 diabetes patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (randomized controlled trials) Journal of Diabetes Research. 2020;2020(1):6978128. doi: 10.1155/2020/6978128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sigal et al. (2007).Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boulé NG, Wells GA, Prud’homme D, Fortier M, Reid RD, Tulloch H, Coyle D, Phillips P, Jennings A, Jaffey J. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(6):357–369. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Silveira-Rodrigues et al. (2021).Silveira-Rodrigues JG, Pires W, Gomes PF, Ogando PHM, Melo BP, Aleixo IMS, Soares DD. Combined exercise training improves specific domains of cognitive functions and metabolic markers in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2021;173:108700. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sparks et al. (2013).Sparks LM, Johannsen NM, Church TS, Earnest CP, Moonen-Kornips E, Moro C, Hesselink MK, Smith SR, Schrauwen P. Nine months of combined training improves ex vivo skeletal muscle metabolism in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;98(4):1694–1702. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stomby et al. (2017).Stomby A, Otten J, Ryberg M, Nyberg L, Olsson T, Boraxbekk CJ. A paleolithic diet with and without combined aerobic and resistance exercise increases functional brain responses and hippocampal volume in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2017;9:391. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2024b).Sun Z, Liu H, Yan M, Zeng H, Hu Y, Tian X, Mao D. The effect of multi-component exercise on cognition function in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2024b;19(6):e0304795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2024a).Sun Y, Lu B, Su W, Song X, Shang X, Zheng J, Wang J, Yun H. Comprehensive assessment of the effects of concurrent strength and endurance training on lipid profile, glycemic control, and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2024a;103(12):e37494. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000037494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suzuki et al. (2012).Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, Uemura K, Lee S, Park H. Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology. 2012;12:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Szendroedi, Phielix & Roden (2011).Szendroedi J, Phielix E, Roden M. The role of mitochondria in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2011;8(2):92–103. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Szilágyi et al. (2019).Szilágyi B, Kukla A, Makai A, Ács P, Járomi M. Sports therapy and recreation exercise program in type 2 diabetes: randomized controlled trial, 3-month follow-up. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019;59(4):676–685. doi: 10.23736/s0022-4707.18.08591-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tomas-Carus et al. (2016).Tomas-Carus P, Ortega-Alonso A, Pietilainen KH, Santos V, Goncalves H, Ramos J, Raimundo A. A randomized controlled trial on the effects of combined aerobic-resistance exercise on muscle strength and fatigue, glycemic control and health-related quality of life of type 2 diabetes patients. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2016;56:572–578. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.87110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsai et al. (2018).Tsai CL, Ukropec J, Ukropcová B, Pai MC. An acute bout of aerobic or strength exercise specifically modifies circulating exerkine levels and neurocognitive functions in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage: Clinical. 2018;17:272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Umpierre et al. (2013).Umpierre D, Ribeiro PA, Schaan BD, Ribeiro JP. Volume of supervised exercise training impacts glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis. Diabetologia. 2013;56(2):242–251. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2774-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Umpierrez et al. (2014).Umpierrez G, Tofé Povedano S, Pérez Manghi F, Shurzinske L, Pechtner V. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3) Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2168–2176. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Venkataraman et al. (2019).Venkataraman K, Tai BC, Khoo EYH, Tavintharan S, Chandran K, Hwang SW, Phua MSLA, Wee HL, Koh GCH, Tai ES. Short-term strength and balance training does not improve quality of life but improves functional status in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2019;62(12):2200–2210. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-04979-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2020).Wang SY, Zhu S, Wu J, Zhang M, Xu Y, Xu W, Cui J, Yu B, Cao W, Liu J. Exercise enhances cardiac function by improving mitochondrial dysfunction and maintaining energy homoeostasis in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2020;98(2):245–261. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01861-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu & Ballantyne (2017).Wu H, Ballantyne CM. Skeletal muscle inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2017;127:43–54. doi: 10.1172/jci88880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2021).Wu JD, Liang DL, Xie Y, Chen MY, Chen HH, Sun D, Hu HQ. Association between hemoglobin glycation index and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;8:690689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xing et al. (2022).Xing H, Lu J, Yoong SQ, Tan YQ, Kusuyama J, Wu XV. Effect of aerobic and resistant exercise intervention on inflammaging of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2022;23(5):823–830.e813. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yavari et al. (2012).Yavari A, Najafipour F, Aliasgharzadeh A, Niafar M, Mobasseri M. Effect of aerobic exercise, resistance training or combined training on glycaemic control and cardio-vascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Biology of Sport. 2012;29(2):135–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Yue et al. (2023).Yue Y, Deng M, Liao S, Xiao G, Huang Y. Effects of mindfulness training combined with Tai Chi in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2023 doi: 10.3791/65421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaki, Sharma & Vats (2024).Zaki S, Sharma S, Vats H. Effectiveness of concurrent exercise training in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2024;40(9):2094–2115. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2225717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2024).Zhang J, Tam WWS, Hounsri K, Kusuyama J, Wu VX. Effectiveness of combined aerobic and resistance exercise on cognition, metabolic health, physical function, and health-related quality of life in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2024;105(8):1585–1599. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng, Ley & Hu (2018).Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2018;14(2):88–98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Contribution to Existing Knowledge.
peerj-13-20146-s001.docx (13.7KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20146/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. PRISMA 2010 checklist.
peerj-13-20146-s002.docx (30.6KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20146/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data was not generated in this is a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES