Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Nov 24;20(11):e0337337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337337

Utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Tanzania rural areas: a case of Kilwa district, Lindi region, 2023

David Mahwera 1,2, Rose Msaki 3, Rogath Kishimba 2,4, Fatma Abdallah 3, Danford Mahwera 5, Vicent Assay 3, George Mrema 1,2,4,*, Geofrey Mchau 1,2,3, Germana Leyna 1,3, Theresia Ambrose 1
Editor: Charles Odilichukwu R Okpala6
PMCID: PMC12643270  PMID: 41284681

Abstract

This study assessed household utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Kilwa district, Tanzania, where utilization remains low, especially in areas with local salt production. Using a cross-sectional design, 493 households were systematically sampled and interviewed, with 14 local salt producers purposively recruited for in-depth interviews; onsite iodine rapid tests and laboratory analyses determined salt iodine content. Results showed only 9.4% of households used adequately iodized salt. Factors significantly associated with utilization included family size of five or fewer members (AOR = 3.49; 95% CI: 1.62–7.54), good knowledge about iodized salt (AOR = 4.97; 95% CI: 2.04–12.11), storage of salt in dry areas (AOR = 4.44; 95% CI: 1.51–13.07), exposure of salt to sunlight (AOR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10–0.85), and salt staying less than two months (AOR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.10–5.00). Key reasons for low availability of iodized salt included poor protection at production sites, supply of non-iodized salt, lack of training for local producers, community preference for non-iodized salt, and presence of multiple local salt producers. The findings indicate that the prevalence of iodized salt use is very low in Kilwa, with factors such as family size, knowledge, storage practices, sunlight exposure, and salt duration influencing utilization. The study recommends intensified government awareness campaigns to improve knowledge and practices related to iodized salt use, alongside interventions to enhance salt quality and availability at production sites.

Introduction

Iodine is a micronutrient that is necessary at modest levels for both human and animal physiologic function. It is a crucial part of thyroid hormones, which are essential for regulating metabolic rate, growth, and development of bodily structures as well as neuronal function and growth [1]. Iodine deficiency disorders are a major public health concern in Tanzania. Approximately 25% of the population was said to have an iodine deficiency condition, while 41% of people lived in regions that had an iodine shortage [2]. In order to meet iodine requirements the daily intake of iodine recommended by the National Research of the US National Academy of science was 40 μg/day for young infants (0–6 month), 50 μg/day for older infants (6–12 months), 60–100 μg/day for children (1–10 years) and 150 μg/day for adolescent and adult [3]. Nearly 2 billion individuals worldwide are still affected by iodine deficiency illnesses which put them at risk for cognitive impairment, stillbirth, and irreparable brain damage [1,4,5]. Individuals from similar populations in regions without severe iodine shortage may have intelligence quotient that are up to 13.5 points higher than those in places with severe iodine deficiency [6].

The main cause of thyroid pathology in Africa is dietary iodine insufficiency, which leads to a variety of iodine deficiency illnesses, including goiters, hypothyroidism, and mental retardation, the last of which presents the greatest risk to socioeconomic well-being. Iodine deficiency poses a threat to 350 million Africans at the very least. Goiters are estimated to affect 28.3% of Africans, and the continent accounts for around 25% of the world’s iodine deficiency burden as measured by disability-adjusted living years (DALYs) according to estimates from the WHO [7]. In Tanzania especially in the Southern Highlands regions, the total goiter prevalence (TGP) was up to 90%, and 50% of schoolchildren had hypothyroidism [8]. The global strategy for the eradication of iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) was identified as universal salt iodization (USI), which aims to iodize all salt for human and animal consumption in order to ensure adequate iodine nutrition. This strategy has been proposed in numerous studies carried out in various locations [9]. Around the world, 70% of households consume adequate iodized salt, and more than 120 nations are running USI initiatives. Of these, 34 countries have already reached USI, another 28 are almost there, and additionally, 84 million children are shielded each year from the danger of IDD, with the number of nations where the issue is still present falling to 47 [10].

Salt production in Tanzania primarily involves two main methods: solar evaporation along the coastal belt and islands such as Pemba, where seawater is collected and allowed to evaporate naturally under the sun; and thermal or boiling techniques used inland in regions like Dodoma and Njombe, where brine is heated to extract salt. The process begins by channeling seawater or brine into salt beds or ponds, where it is left to evaporate over time, leading to the crystallization of salt. Once the salt crystals form, producers harvest and dry the salt before packaging. In Tanzania, approximately 422 salt production sites are dispersed mainly along the coastal regions, with small-scale producers constituting about 86% of the total. A typical local salt producer employs an average of 2–3 workers, mainly family members or seasonal laborers, with small-scale farms often operated by individual farmers or informal groups. Packaging methods vary, including simple polypropylene bags, laminated polythene, or paper bags, often imprinted with product details such as origin, date, and weight; however, many small producers lack standardized labeling. Distribution patterns indicate that about 90% of the salt produced is sold locally within regions, primarily to wholesalers, retailers, and households, while some salt is exported to neighboring countries like Rwanda and Malawi. In terms of affordability, small-scale producers face challenges due to high production costs, limited economies of scale, and restricted access to affordable potassium iodate, which affects both the quality and cost of salt. Consequently, most producers sell their salt at prices influenced by these constraints, often making iodized salt less accessible or affordable for poorer households, highlighting the need for strengthening support systems and consolidation models to improve quality and market access (Unpublished TFNC report “Mapping of the salt sector for a comprehensive plan towards consolidation model for sustainable universal salt iodation.2019”).

USI has been adopted in Tanzania as a means of eliminating IDD in the country. USI goal is to ensure that household coverage in Iodated salt utilization reaches 90%, however, Tanzania still have a coverage of 61.2% as per Tanzania National Nutrition Survey of 2018 [11]. Iodized salt that contain >15ppm and <40 ppm were considered adequately iodized for the prevention of iodine deficiency [6]. Low coverage of iodized salt may place the community a risk of irreversible brain damage, stillbirth, and cognitive impairment [1]. In Tanzania, it was reported that low iodine utilization is mainly in rural areas and might be caused by the low knowledge on the importance use of iodized salt utilization, inadequate availability of iodized salt in the community, price of iodized salt and cultural beliefs in the community (Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), unpublished annual report of 2021). This study provides the current prevalence of iodized salt utilization at the household level in rural and explore the factors that influence the household level utilization of iodized salt in the community as well as the reasons for inadequate availability of iodized salt in the community among local salt producers in Kilwa, Tanzania.

Understanding the current prevalence of households utilizing adequately iodized salt is essential, as is identifying the factors associated with iodized salt utilization and the reasons behind its adequate availability in the community, especially among local salt producers in Kilwa. This information will enable the government, through TFNC, to design targeted interventions to improve household coverage of iodized salt and support local salt producers in enhancing the quality and availability of adequately iodized salt. While previous studies have explored salt iodization, there remains a notable research gap concerning the specific factors influencing iodized salt use among households and the role of local producers in Kilwa. Addressing this gap will help tailor more effective strategies to combat iodine deficiency in the region. To supplement existing literature, therefore, this current work assessed household utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Kilwa district, which is among Tanzania rural areas, and this was performed by way of cross-sectional design across local salt producers.

Study methodology

Schematic overview of study program

The flow diagram below illustrates the sequential methodology steps that structured this study. It encompasses major stages including sampling design, questionnaire development, data collection, laboratory analysis, and data analysis, aligning with the objective to assess iodized salt utilization and production practices in Kilwa district. This approach uniquely combines both quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of the problem, leveraging the strengths of each to compensate for potential limitations. The steps depicted in the diagram were validated through pre-testing of tools, training of data collectors, and quality control measures such as blinded testing and laboratory instrument calibration, ensuring robustness and reliability of the findings (fig 1).

Fig 1. The flow diagram showing schematic overview of study program.

Fig 1

Questionnaire development process

The development of the research instruments involved a systematic process that integrated expert experience, literature review, and contextual relevance. Initially, a comprehensive review of existing questionnaires on salt iodization and related health behaviors was conducted, drawing insights from national and peer reviewed studies. To tailor the questionnaire to local context, we consulted with specialists in public health, nutrition, and salt production, whose expertise helped identify culturally appropriate and relevant items. The questionnaire contents were then drafted to include demographic information, salt storage practices, beliefs, knowledge, and consumption behaviors, ensuring all key variables were covered. A content validation process was carried out where subject matter experts reviewed the draft for clarity, relevance, and completeness; their feedback was incorporated, enhancing the instrument’s validity. Subsequently, the finalized questionnaire was approved by the study supervisors and ethical review board.

The questionnaire was organized into 3 sections covering: (1) Socio-demographic characteristics, (2) Proportion of households using iodized salt, and (3) Factors associated with iodized salt utilization, including individual practices, beliefs about iodized salt, assessment, and purchase and accessibility factors. Covering 6 pages with a total of 30 questions, this study employed both structured and semi-structured questionnaires, both of which were pre-tested prior to the main data collection. During face-to-face interviews with household heads, both types of questionnaires were utilized; however, semi-structured questionnaires were primarily used to allow flexibility in probing responses and clarifying answers, thereby capturing more in-depth qualitative insights. The pre-testing involved a small sample of 12 household heads in a similar setting to assess clarity, relevance, and respondent understanding. This process helped identify ambiguous questions and logistical challenges, ensuring the validity and reliability of the main data collection instruments.

Study design, area and population

A cross-sectional study was carried out in April 2023 in the Lindi region. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were utilized for data collection. The use of both quantitative and qualitative methods has a power to generate a clear picture of the problem under study than a single method can yield because weaknesses of one method can be compensated by another method [12]. Additionally, combination of both methods permits mutual validation of the findings [13]. Lindi region is located in southern part of Tanzania mainland having a population of 864,652 with an estimated growth rate of 0.9% and an area of 15,000 km2 and, with 225,972 households (24). The region has one municipal council called Lindi municipal council and, five district councils namely Kilwa district council, Lindi district council, Liwale district council, Nachingwea district council and Ruangwa district council. The main source of income in Lindi region is agriculture [14]. Lindi was chosen because it has a lower proportion of households utilizing adequately iodized salt and the presence of local salt production sites Within Lindi region, Kilwa district was purposively chosen because it is the worst performer among all districts in Lindi region (Unpublished TFNC reports).

The study involved heads of households and local production sites in charges from Mandawa, Kiranjeranje, Miteja and Tingi wards.

Sample size and sampling technique

We estimated the minimum sample size of 493 households using a formula for estimating a sample for proportions [15], considering previous proportion of households using adequately iodized salt at Lindi 37.6% [11]. A two-stage cluster sampling design was used for sample selection. We considered a design effect of 1.226, as reported in a national survey on iodine deficiency conducted in Tanzania among school children [11]. Additionally, we adjusted for a 10% non-response rate.“ In executing this sampling design, the first stage involved random selection of 4 wards (Mandawa, Kiranjeranje, Miteja, Tingi) from a list of available wards in Kilwa district and the second stage involved systematic selection of 493 households from 4 selected wards. Systematic sampling was ideal for our study due to the large population and availability of a comprehensive sampling frame. It ensures even distribution across the population, reducing clustering, and helps prevent selection bias through its structured, random approach. To ensure representativeness, the sampling frame was complete, the sample size was sufficient to capture population variability, and the interval (k) was appropriately calculated to ensure proportional representation throughout the population. Households were picked in the interval of 6 at Mandawa ward, 5 at Kiranjeranje ward, 3 at Miteja ward and 3 at Tingi ward. The selection interval was obtained by dividing the total households in each selected ward by the desired sample size. The first house was picked randomly by spinning a pen then the following households were picked in north direction. Different selection intervals were used for different wards to account for variations in population size within each ward. This approach ensured proportional representation across wards, allowing for a more balanced and equitable sample distribution. By adjusting the selection interval based on the total number of households per ward, the sampling process-maintained consistency in coverage while avoiding over or under representation of any specific area

For the qualitative part of the study, a convenience sampling method was utilized to select 14 local production sites out of 101 sites present in Kilwa district. The choice was influenced by its practicality, ease of access, time efficiency and logistical constraints, such as limited funding and time However, this approach has potential limitations. It may introduce selection bias, as the selected sites might not be representative of all salt producers in the region. Consequently, the findings may have limited generalizability, reducing their applicability to the broader population. Despite these limitations, convenience sampling was considered appropriate for the exploratory nature of this study and for generating initial insights into the local production and availability of iodized salt.

Sites which were accessible and its hamlet leader was present in a day of interview was the one chosen for this study. It has been previously mentioned that at least 12 respondents are sufficient to reach data saturation in qualitative studies [16]. In our case qualitative data saturation for the in-depth interviews was determined after conducting nine out of the planned fourteen interviews, no new information was emerging. At this point, participant responses became repetitive and consistent with previously gathered data, indicating that thematic saturation had been reached. Although three additional interviews were conducted to confirm and strengthen the identified information, they did not yield any new information. This confirmed that the data collected after the ninth interview was sufficient to capture the range of perspectives relevant to the study objectives. Consequently, a purposive sampling approach was used to recruit 14 local production sites in charges. A purposive sampling aim to select participants who are more knowledgeable about the problem under investigation and was chosen based on years of experience in salt production [17].

Data measurement and quality control

Data collection was conducted by trained research assistants under the supervision of the principal investigator from April 3–29, 2023, research assistants supported the quantitative part only, to avoid interview bias, the qualitative component was conducted by the Principal Investigator, who was skilled and experienced in conducting such interviews, ensuring consistency, neutrality, and professionalism throughout the data collection process. Prior to data collection the data collectors did not know the iodine content (whether it was high, low, or absent) of the salt samples they were collecting or testing. They were blinded, they treat all samples equally and record exactly what the test shows no assumptions.

Training was provided to all research assistants in the use of questionnaire and other data collection tools. Each data collector was provided with questionnaire in paper based, rapid test kits (RTKs) for testing salt samples on the site and plastic bags for salt sample collection and storage ready for laboratory analysis.

Semi Structured and pre-tested questionnaires were used to conduct face to face interviews with the heads of households to collect information on factors associated with adequately iodized salt utilization. However, an interview guide with open ended questions was used to conduct face to face in-depth interview with site in charges to collect information on the profile of the recruited local production sites at Kilwa district. In-depth interviews were audio recorded by a digital audio recorder for transcription, translation and coding.

Before starting the process of data collection, data collection tools (questionnaire and in-depth interview guide) were pre-tested among 12 number of head of households and 2 number of local production sites in-charges, in one of the wards namely Masoko ward within Kilwa districts which was not part of wards for this study. Masoko ward has similar characteristics.

Salt samples (a tea spoonful) collected from the households and local production sites were qualitatively tested for iodine using iodine rapid testing kit [18]. A salt samples which turned to blue or purple color after being exposed to a drop of test solution were considered to be iodized [19]. All salt samples which were positive for the rapid test were placed into a screwed capped plastic container and appropriately labeled ready for being transported to Kigoma Regional Referral Hospital (RRH) laboratory to be tested for iodine content. The laboratory analysis of these salt samples were performed by using WYD machine [20]. Before the sample being tested for iodine content, a WYD machine quality check was performed in Kigoma Regional Referral Hospital (RRH laboratory to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the instruments.

Inclusion, exclusion criteria and variables

Inclusion criteria.

The study recruited head of households and in charge of the local production sites lived in the study area for more than 12 months.

Exclusion criteria.

Seriously ill participants and participants with mental problems were excluded to participate in the study.

Dependent variable.

The dependent variable of this study was utilization of adequately iodized salt. This variable was used as a binary variable. Households that utilize salt with iodine content ≥15 ppm were termed to utilize adequately iodize salt and those with iodine content < 15 ppm were regarded to utilize inadequately iodized salt.

Independent variables.

Independent variables included the following; Demographic and economic information such as age, sex, occupation, education level, and family income level. Household salt preference was assessed by identifying whether participants preferred rock salt or common/powdered salt. Beliefs regarding iodized salt were also explored, with households scoring “yes” if they reported cultural beliefs that prohibited the use of iodized. Practices related to iodized salt utilization were assessed through several factors, including the type of storage container used (container with lid, container without lid, or plastic bag), exposure to sunlight (yes or no), storage location (near fire, moist area, or dry area), place of purchase (open markets, salt farms, or local shops), and the duration the salt was kept at home (more than two months or two months or less). Additionally, accessibility was measured by the time taken to obtain salt (30 minutes or less versus more than 30 minutes). Economic factors, such as the perceived cost of iodized salt (cheap or expensive), and participants’ knowledge about iodized salt were also assessed.

In this study Knowledge was assessed by calculating the mean score from four sets of questions designed to evaluate participants’ knowledge by assigning 1 point to each correct answer, and 0 to an incorrect answer. First, the total number of correct answers was calculated for each participant. Then, the mean score was obtained by summing the correct answers of all participants and dividing by the total number of participants. Participants who scored greater than or equal to the mean were classified as having good knowledge, while those who scored below the mean were classified as having poor knowledge. Furthermore, income level was classified based on data from the Household Budget Survey (HBS) conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) to assess income levels and poverty. This survey collects detailed information on household income and expenditure, which helps in understanding the distribution of income across different regions and demographics [21].

Data processing and analysis

Quantitative data was collected by using questionnaires in paper form, was then entered in excel for cleaning and then transported to STATA version 15 for analysis. In this study both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze quantitative data. All data are summarized in tables and figures for clear understanding. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to find the association between the dependent and independent variables. During bivariable analysis, variables with р ≤ 0.2 were included in multivariable analysis. To compensate for the potential confounding influence of independent factors, a multivariable analysis was performed. In multivariable analysis, variables with р ≤ 0.05 was considered significantly associated with utilization adequately iodized salt [22].

Qualitative data was audio recorded. Content analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data using NVivo software [23] NVivo was chosen because it is user friendly, there was access to experts who could provide support during the analysis process, and we preferred the use of commercial software. During the content analysis approach, the researcher first transcribed all recorded information into word document. During this process the researcher ensured that all transcribed data are clean by eliminating all irrelevant information. Thereafter, transcribed data was translated into English language and imported into NVivo software, carefully coded and finally organized into appropriate themes [24].

Definition of terms

Adequately iodized salt.

Salt that contains ≥15 parts of iodine per million parts of salt, assessed by taking salt samples that become positive to RTK on site and sent in laboratory for quantitative analysis [25].

Partially iodized salt.

Salt that contains less than 15 parts of iodine per million parts of salt assessed by taking salt samples that become positive to RTK on site and sent in laboratory for quantitative analysis.

Non-iodized salt.

Salt that has no iodine which may cause a lot of public health problems such as congenital malformations, stillbirth, brain damage, etc. that was assessed by testing salt sample on site by rapid test kit (RTK).

Utilization of adequately iodized salt.

This is the act of using/uptake or eating salt that contains ≥15 parts of iodine per million parts of salt. This study regarded participants with adequately iodized salt at home as participants who utilize adequately iodized salt.

Household.

As per this study household is a group of individuals who live together and share the same cooking and living space [11].

WYD Machine.

An instrument for quick measurement of Iodine concentration in Iodized salt [26]

Ethical clearance

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical review board at Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences with approval number MUHAS-REC-11-2022-1462. All Participants for both qualitative and quantitative parts were given explanation on the objectives of the study then written and verbal informed consent was given to the participants that highlighted the right to withdraw from the study any time without consequences; only consented participants were involved in the study. Name and other personal identifiers were excluded in the questionnaire and only identification numbers were used instead to ensure confidentiality. During in-depth interviews, given the sensitivity of some responses, no participant was asked to provide their name, and each was assigned a unique ID number. All interviews were conducted individually at participants’ respective farms to maintain privacy and avoid group influence. To ensure potential risks to participants were minimized, especially for local salt producers, care was taken to clarify that the study was not regulatory in nature and that the information collected would not be used for enforcement or inspection purposes. This helped reduce any fear of reprisal or negative consequences. Additionally, data collection on local salt producers was done by Principal investigator that had knowledge to uphold ethical principles, including respect, privacy, and cultural sensitivity throughout the study process. Additionally, permission to enter into selected wards was obtained from Ward Executive Officers (WEOs).

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

Out of the 493 visited households, 435 heads of households were available to participate in the study, resulting in a response rate of 88.2%. The characteristics of these respondents are provided below. Two hundred and seventy-three (62.8%) of the respondents were female. Regarding age, majority 252(57.9%) of the respondents were in the age group of 26–35 years with a mean age of 21 years (Standard deviation = 11). Majority 223 (51.3%) of the respondents had primary level of education, and 344 (79.1%) had low level of income (less than Tshs. 100, 000 per month). Peasants contributing to 239(54.9%) and households with more than five family members had 239(54.9%) of the total respondents. Respondents were drawn from 13 villages across four wards within Kilwa District, ensuring broad geographic representation of the study area. Table 1 summarizes the findings.

Table 1. Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of the respondents in Kilwa District, Lindi Region (n = 435).

Variable Category Frequency (%)
Gender Female 273 (62.8)
Male 162 (37.2)
Age Group (Years) Below 18 yrs. 16 (3.7)
18-25 28 (6.4)
26-35 252 (57.9)
36-45 74 (17.0)
Above 45 yrs. 65 (14.9)
Level of Education Illiterate 115 (26.4)
Primary Education 223 (51.3)
Secondary Education 79 (18.2)
Higher Education 18 (4.1)
Source of income Government Employees 13 (3.0)
Merchants 52 (12.0)
Self-employed 131 (30.1)
Peasants 239 (54.9)
Income level Low 344 (79.1)
Average 86 (19.8)
High 5 (1.1)
Family size >5 members 239 (54.9)
≤5 members 196 (45.1)
Village Hotel tatu 54 (12.4)
Kibaoni 11 (2.5)
Kiranjeranje 69 (15.9)
Kiwawa 15 (3.5)
Mandawa 76 (17.5)
Matandu 28 (6.4)
Mbwemkuru 21 (4.8)
Mtandango 19 (4.4)
Mtandi 16 (3.7)
Njia nne 46 (10.6)
Sinza 35 (8.1)
Kiswele 19 (4.4)
Mitumba 26 (6.0)
Ward Kiranjeranje 125 (28.8)
Mandawa 171 (39.3)
Tingi 65 (14.9)
Miteja 74 (17.0)

Proportion of households that use adequately iodized salt

Out of 435 collected salt samples from surveyed households, only 41 (9.4%) households were found utilizing salt with adequate iodine content (≥ 15 ppm) while 394 (90.6%) households had inadequately iodized salt (< 15 ppm) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Level of iodine content in the collected salt samples in households at Kilwa district, 2023.

Fig 2

The above bar chart illustrates the distribution of iodine concentration levels in salt samples collected during the study. Two categories are represented: salt with adequate iodine levels (≥ 15 parts per million [ppm]) and salt with inadequate iodine levels (< 15 ppm). The chart shows that only 9.4% of the salt samples met the recommended iodine concentration for human consumption, while a significantly larger proportion, 90.6%, had iodine levels below the recommended threshold. This indicates a major public health concern regarding the availability and use of adequately iodized salt in the study area.

Stratification by ward revealed substantial variation in the use of adequately iodized salt. Miteja ward 17 (41.5%) had the highest proportion of households with adequately iodized, whereas Kiranjeranje ward 3 (7.3%) recorded the lowest. A similar pattern was observed at village level, where Njia Nne and Sinza villages had the highest adequacy levels (9 (21.9%) each), while several villages including Mbwemkuru, Mtandi, and Kiswele reported no household using adequately iodized salt. Fig 3 and 4 provide more details.

Fig 3. Adequacy of iodized salt use among households by wards, Kilwa District, 2023.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Adequacy of iodized salt use among households by village, Kilwa District, 2023.

Fig 4

Further analysis of household demographic characteristics with respect to age and sex, adults aged 26–35 constituted the largest proportion of respondent using adequately iodized salt. Utilization was similar between males and females across most age categories (fig 5). Furthermore, respondent with primary education level 21 (51.2%) accounted for the majority of adequate users (fig 6).

Fig 5. Distribution of adequately iodized salt use by age group and sex among surveyed households, Kilwa District, 2023.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Distribution of adequately iodized salt use by education level of household respondents, Kilwa District, 2023.

Fig 6

Knowledge on iodized salt

Table 2 shows that about 50.6% of the participants had good knowledge about iodized salt. Specifically, majority (82.5%) heard about adequately iodized salt. Of all heard about adequately iodized salt, majority 43.7% got information from health workers. Regarding salt identification, majority (81.2%) had no knowledge for identification of iodized salt and 68.3% knew the benefits of using adequately iodized salt. Proportion of respondents with knowledge on the effect on non-use of adequately iodized salt (44.4%) was nearly equal to those who had no such knowledge (55.6%).

Table 2. Knowledge on iodized salt among households in Kilwa district, 2023.

Variables Category Frequency (%)
Overall level of knowledge about iodized salt Poor 215 (49.4)
Good 220 (50.6)
Heard about adequately iodized salt No 76 (17.5)
Yes 359 (82.5)
Source of Information Mass media 21 (5.8)
Health workers 157 (43.7)
Friends and relatives 92 (25.6)
Salt sellers 89 (24.8)
Ability to know if salt is iodized No 354 (81.2)
Yes 81 (18.6)
Ability to identify benefits of using adequately iodized salt No 138 (31.7)
Yes 297 (68.3)
Ability to identify effect on non-use of adequately iodized salt No 242 (55.6)
Yes 193 (44.4)

Factors influencing utilization of adequately iodized salt

Table 3 shows that of all variables analyzed during binary logistic regression only gender, family size, cultural belief, knowledge about iodized salt, storage place, expose to sunlight, time to stay with salt and perceived price of iodized salt are associated with utilization of adequately iodized salt. However, during multivariable logistic regression, family size, knowledge about iodized salt, storage place, expose to sunlight and time to stay with salt significantly influence utilization of adequately iodized salt.

Table 3. Factors associated with adequate iodized salt utilization among households in Kilwa district, 2023 (n = 435).

Variables Total Yes Crude odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Gender
Female 273 22 (8.1%) 1
Male 162 19 (11.7%) 1.52 (0.79, 2.90) 1.81 (0.84, 3.94)
Age
Below 18 16 1 (6.3%) 1
18-25 28 2 (7.1%) 1.15 (0.10, 13.82)
26-35 252 28 (11.1%) 1.88 (0.24, 14.74)
36-45 74 4 (5.4%) 0.86 (0.09. 8.22)
Above 45 65 6 (9.2%) 1.53 (0.17, 13.65)
Level of Education
Illiterate 115 10 (8.7%) 1
Primary education 223 21 (9.4%) 1.09 (0.50, 2.40)
Secondary education 79 7 (8.9%) 1.02 (0.37. 2.81)
Higher education 18 3 (16.7%) 2.10(0.52, 8.51)
Family size
>5 members 239 12 (5.0%) 1
≤5 members 196 29 (14.8%) 3.29 (1.63, 6.63) 3.49(1.62, 7.54) **
Income source
Government 40 6 (15.4%) 1
Merchants 209 19 (13.5%) 0.86 (0.16, 4.70)
Self-employed 130 10 (8.4%) 0.50 (0.10, 2.57)
Peasants 56 6 (8.8%) 0.53 (0.11, 2.55)
Income level
Low 344 30 (8.7%) 1
Average 86 10 (11.6%) 1.38 (0.65, 2.94)
High 5 1 (20.0%) 2.62 (0.28, 24.17)
Salt preference
Common salt 278 28 (10.1%) 1
Rock salt 157 13 (8.3%) 0.81 (0.41, 1.61)
Cultural beliefs
Yes 216 14 (6.5%) 1
No 219 27 (12.3%) 2.03(1.03, 3.99) 1.89 (0.87, 4.10)
Variables Total Yes Crude Odds Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Knowledge about iodized salt
Poor 215 7 (3.3%) 1
Good 220 34 (5.5%) 5.43 (2.35, 12.55) 4.97 (2.04, 12.11) *
Storage place
Near fire 111 5 (4.5%) 1
Moist area 189 10 (5.3%) 1.18 (0.39, 3.56) 1.19 (0.37, 3.82)
Dry area 135 26 (19.3%) 5.06 (1.87, 13.66) 4.44 (1.51, 13.07) **
Type of storage container
Container with lid 50 7 (14.0%) 1
Plastic bag 303 27(8.9%) 0.60 (0.45, 1.47)
Container without lid 82 7 (8.5%) 0.57 (0.19, 1.74)
Expose to sunlight
No 318 36 (11.3%) 1
Yes 117 5 (4.3%) 0.35 (0.13, 0.91) 0.30 (0.10, 0.85) **
Duration you stay with salt
> 2 months 262 14 (5.3%) 1
≤ 2 months 173 27 (15.6%) 3.28 (1.66, 6.45) 2.34 (1.10, 5.00) *
Salt buying place
Open Market 181 17 (9.4%) 1
Salt farms 88 9 (10.2%) 1.10 (0.47, 2.58)
Local shops 166 15 (9.0%) 0.96 (0.46, 1.99)
Distance to get salt
≤30 minutes 368 34 (9.2%) 1
>30 minutes 67 7 (10.4%) 1.15 (0.49, 2.71)
Perceived cost of iodized salt
Cheap 49 8 (16.3%) 1
Expensive 386 33 (8.5%) 0.48 (0.21, 1.11) 0.82 (0.31, 2.47)

*P-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01, ***p-value<0.001 Significant on multivariable logistic regression

The odds of utilization of adequately iodized salt are 3.49 (AOR, 3.49; 95%CI: 1.62, 7.54) times higher among households with family size with equal or less than five members compared with households with more than five family members. Moreover, the odds of utilization of adequately iodized salt among households with good knowledge about iodized salt are 4.97 (AOR. 4.970; 95%CI: 2.04, 12.11) times higher compared with households with poor knowledge. Additionally, households which store their salt in dry area are 4.44 (AOR, 4.44; 95% CI: 1.51, 13.07) times more likely to utilize adequately iodized salt than households which store their salt near fire. Again, the odds of utilization of adequately iodized salt are decreased by 70% (AOR, 0.30; 95%CI: 0.10, 0.85) among households which expose their salt at sunlight compared to non-expose to sunlight. Lastly, households which stay with salt for less than two months are 2.34 (AOR, 2.34; 95% CI: 1.10, 5.00) times more likely to utilize adequately iodized salt than households which stay with salt for more than two months.

Reasons for inadequate availability of adequately iodized salt

Poor protection of salt production sites.

Low availability of adequately iodized salt in the study area was also caused by poor protection of salt production sites as one of the respondents mentioned that:

…after collecting it in the fields because there are no guards, people go there and steal as much as they see fit (Respondent 2).

Similar to this opinion, another respondent argued that:

…the salt without iodine is often stolen and people take it to the street to sell (Respondent 3).

Supply of non-iodized salt to workers.

Findings from interview also revealed that a tendency of in charges of local production sites to provide non-iodized salt to their workers free of charge contribute to poor utilization of adequately iodized salt in Kilwa district. This was revealed by the majority of the participants. One of the respondents had the following to say during interview session:

…No, we don’t give salt as wages, but when we finish harvesting, they are given salt for use in their homes (Respondent 4).

Similar view was given by another respondent who asserted:

…Yes, sometimes when there is not enough money, we usually give them about two sacks of salt to sell and earn money, we don’t put iodine in salt until we are transporting it, so they get salt without iodine (Respondent 5).

Unavailability of training to local salt producers.

Absence of formal training to local salt producer was another reason for poor availability of adequately iodized salt in the study area as stated by the majority of the participants. During interview session one the respondent had the following to say:

For about 3 to 4 years there has been no training in salt production or handling” (Respondent 1).

Similarly, another respondent highlighted that:

…There is no special training, but we teach each other in the field. We have never been given formal education from the district level or other lower levels” (Respondent 7).

Presence of other local salt producers in the community.

It was found that in the community there some people who are producing salt at their home in a small amount which was not enough to be transported outside the village and hence they just produce for selling in the local market and using at home

“… some people cook salt in their homes for their own use and sometimes they sell it to people in the village” (Respondent 2).

Community preference on non-iodized salt.

The study also reviled that the majority in the community including the local salt producers want/prefers salt that is straight coming from the farm which is not added with anything including iodine(non-iodized)

However, people don’t want industrial salt, they demand it contains chemicals, that’s why they fail to reproduce, people believe that salt like salt from the sea is good and it gives you strength” (Respondent 2).

Similarly, another respondent highlighted that:

“... although the community and homes do not want salt with iodine” (Respondent 1).

Discussion

Findings of this study revealed that 9.4% of households in Kilwa district utilize adequately iodized salt (≥ 15 ppm) which is lower than 90% recommended by WHO. Based on these findings, one may argue that despite of existence of universal salt iodization programme in the country a large number of households in Kilwa district are at high risk of developing iodine deficiency illnesses. Furthermore, although there is a legal framework under the Tanzania Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act (CAP 219) specifically the Iodated Salt Regulations, published on 23 April 2010 which governs the production, importation, and distribution of iodated salt, challenges still persist. These regulations detail several key requirements, including restrictions on the importation of iodated salt, standards for edible salt, conditions for packaging and labeling, compliance with packaging and storage guidelines, inspection and analysis procedures by authorized officers, and penalties for non-compliance [27]. Low availability of adequately iodized salt in the study area might be attributed to households’ poor salt storage practice and/or poor technology employed by local salt producers. The proportion of households with adequately iodized salt found in this study is lower compared to studies conducted in Tach Armachio and Ahferom districts in Northern Ethiopia which were 61.1% and 17.5%, respectively [28,29]. Additionally, this value is also lower than 75% in a study conducted in Prakasam district, India [30]. Moreover, the observed prevalence of utilization of adequately iodized salt in the study area is still lower than recently reported values in two Himalayan districts; 89% in Una district and 91% in Hamirpur district [31]. Due to low utilization of adequately iodized salt contributes to iodine deficiency disorders (IDD), including goiter problems [2]. To address this problem, it is advised to Increase awareness and education on the importance of adequately iodized salt utilization, ensure the consistent availability and accessibility of adequately iodized salt in the community by Working with local salt producers, suppliers, and retailers to ensure a reliable supply chain that can distribute iodized salt to households and local markets. By implementing these solutions, it is possible to increase the utilization of adequately iodized salt, reduce the prevalence of iodine deficiency disorders, and improve the overall health and well-being of the community. Tanzania’s past interventions offer a successful model. Following a 1990 feasibility study, the government supported salt producers by distributing 72 iodation machines, providing training on their use, and establishing quality control systems. A national salt monitoring system was launched, supported by iodine testing laboratories and legal enforcement by trained health inspectors. These efforts boosted iodated salt supply from nearly zero to 18.6% of national demand by 1992. Salt iodation became legally mandated in 1995, significantly increasing access and demonstrating that collaboration with salt producers can greatly improve the availability and use of iodized salt in the country [3]

Findings of this study indicated that, household with equal or less than five members was positively associated with utilization of adequately iodized salt compared to households with more than five family members (Table 3). This is possibly due to the high price of iodized salt at the study area, hence, as a family becomes large, it opts to purchase cheaper salt which is mostly non-iodized. This finding aligns with a study done in Dire Dawa City in Ethiopia which reported that utilization adequately iodized salt was reduced to 61% for households with more than five members [32]. Education on the importance of using adequately iodized salt is very key to the change toward utilization and attaining USI goal, supporting local producers will Encourage local production of iodized salt, either through support for small-scale salt producers or by establishing community-based iodization programs. This can help increase the availability of adequately iodized salt at a more affordable price, benefiting households with larger family sizes.

Moreover, the odds of utilization of adequately iodized salt among households with good knowledge about iodized salt are 4.97 times higher compared with households with poor knowledge (Table 3). This might be due to the fact that households with good knowledge regarding the effect of non-use of adequately iodized salt help them to make good decision when purchasing salt. The finding of this study is consistence with those reported in Gidami district, Ethiopia which indicated that the utilization of adequately iodized salt was higher among households with good knowledge on iodized salt [33].

This study revealed that, the odds for utilization of adequately iodized salt among households storing their salt in dry areas are higher compared to those storing their salt near fire (Table 3). This finding concurs with a study done in Dera district in Ethiopia whereby the ability of salt stored in dry areas to retain iodine content was higher than salt stored near fire areas [34]. Findings of this study also indicated that, utilization of adequately iodized salt were 70% lesser among households exposed their salt to sunlight compared to those who did not (Table 3). Again, this finding aligns with a study done in Tach Armachio district in Northern Ethiopia which reported that utilization of salt with adequate iodine content was reduced to 61% for households exposed their salt to sunlight [28]. It has been mentioned that salt tends to lose iodine when stored in areas such as heat, moisture and light during storage [35].

Lastly, time to stay with salt was also found significantly associated with utilization of adequately iodized salt (Table 3). It was revealed that, as household stay with salt for less than two months, the chance of utilizing adequately iodized salt increase. Findings of this study is consistence with a study carried out in Dera district, Ethiopia in which the availability of adequate iodine content was more likely to be found in salt samples stored for less than two months compared to salt samples stayed for more than two months [34].

This study revealed that poor protection of salt production sites was among the reason that hindered the availability of adequately iodized salt in the community. This study identified and observe the presence of salt sites without being protected as a results salt production sites are vulnerable to unauthorized access and theft. Individuals or groups may exploit the lack of security to steal salt which is not iodized and take home for their use or to sell at their local market leading to a shortage in the supply of adequately iodized salt to the community. This was contrary to the study conducted in Madagascar that require the production sites to be registered before commencing the production, the study revealed that before a place of production is registered or given license to function, it must be examined using a certification checklist to guarantee that the “must have items” essential for the manufacture of adequately iodized salt are present. The problem of production site protection was addressed in the check list by assuring the existence of “fence or wall and clean from rubbish and debris, animals, and unauthorized person passage are assessed. The study in Madagascar revealed that their salt production site was well protected [36]. Poor protection of salt production sites in Kilwa district might be attributed to lack of awareness among local salt producers as local producers may not fully understand the importance of protecting salt production sites and the implications of inadequate security measures. They may not be aware of the potential risks, such as theft, contamination, or adulteration, and how these can affect the availability of adequately iodized salt. Also, it might be due to limited resources as local salt producers, especially small-scale ones, may have limited financial resources to invest in security measures and lastly it might be due to the weak enforcement and regulation as there might be a lack of strict enforcement and regulation by local authorities or government agencies regarding the protection of salt production sites.

Additionally, it was found that workers were given salt to use in their homes, but in some sites, the amount provided was intended for them to sell in the market. The results from this study contradict with Nepal iodized salt act which prohibit the importation or distribute iodine free salt to the community [37]. This practice can be attributed to the owners or site supervisors attempting to compensate the workers by providing salt as a form of wages that they can sell to earn money. This situation typically arises when there is a shortage of customers to purchase the harvested salt, resulting in a lack of funds to pay the workers for their services. To address this issue, the owners or site supervisors opt to give bags of salt to the workers to sell on their behalf. However, since iodine is typically added during transportation or when customers are present, the salt provided for sale is often non-iodized. This practice not only compromises the availability of adequately iodized salt in the market but also poses a risk to the workers who rely on the income generated from selling the salt. It perpetuates the cycle of non-iodized salt consumption and contributes to the overall low utilization of adequately iodized salt in the community.

Moreover, this study found that there is unavailability of training to local salt producers in Kilwa district. These findings were in line with study another conducted in Tanzania which also indicated that unavailability of training caused production of inequality salt a situation which was improved by giving training to local salt producers [38]. The training helps the local salt producers to know the importance of adding iodine to the salt, proper storage as well as the right concentration to add. The lack of training in Kilwa might be attributed by the absence of coordination and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in salt production and iodization.

It is anticipated that all salt producers in the community were supposed to be recognized by the authority (Kilwa District Health Management Team) but this study revealed the presence of other local salt producers in the community. These were the people who were producing salt at their home place and were not recognized by the authority. It was found that they were producing the amount that was insufficient to be transported outside the district but enough to be taken to their local markets. These producers don’t add Iodine to the salt they produce as a result they tend to increase the problem of inadequate availability of adequately iodized salt in the community. The presence of these local salt producers might be caused by the difficulty in life as a result they try to produce salt for use in their homes and generating income for their families by selling the salt they produce. Despite of hardships of life also lack of knowledge about iodized salt led to these people to produce and sell salt without adding iodine.

Lastly, the study revealed that the community prefers the use of non-iodized salt over iodized salt. This was another reason given by local salt producers to why there is non-iodized salt in the community, they say people in the community (Kilwa district) including themselves prefer to use salt that is directly coming from the farm they believe it is not added with anything and it is pure. This is contrary to the study conducted in Dessie and Combolcha Town, South Wollo, Ethiopia and the study done in Prakesam district in India which revealed that the majority (80.4%) and (83.6%) of participants respectively prefer iodized salt over non iodized salt [18,30]. The preference of non-iodized salt over iodized salt might be due to the presence of cultural believes in the community that they believe iodized salt is not good for their health and might cause sterility to both men and women. Due to this, local producer has no other options other than supplying non-iodized salt to meet the demand. Other reasons might be due to poor knowledge about iodized salt among both local salt producers and community as a result they don’t know the benefits and consequences of supplying and using non-iodized salt in their community. Given the cultural preference for non-iodized salt observed in the study area, it is important to implement culturally sensitive education strategies that directly address local beliefs and misconceptions. These strategies should involve community leaders, traditional healers, and respected elders, who can serve as trusted messengers. Educational campaigns should use local languages and culturally appropriate messaging, highlighting the health benefits of iodized salt in the context of local practices and values. Interactive approaches such as community dialogues, storytelling, radio programs, and drama-based outreach can help demystify misconceptions and encourage behavior change. Involving women’s groups and school-based programs may also be effective, as women and children are often key decision makers and vulnerable populations. Tailoring the content to align with local customs while reinforcing scientific facts will enhance acceptance and promote sustainable use of iodized salt.

Challenges and limitations of current study

This study faced several challenges and limitations. One major constraint was the limited availability of prior research on factors influencing iodized salt utilization. Most of the existing literature originated from a single country, i.e., Ethiopia which restricted the diversity of evidence available to inform the study design. Consequently, this limited the generalizability of the findings to broader contexts.

Another limitation was participant non-response. Some individuals declined to take part in the study, potentially introducing response bias. Non-respondents may differ systematically from those who participated, possibly leading to an underestimation of the actual prevalence of adequately iodized salt use. To mitigate this, adjustments for non-response were made during analysis. Additionally, hamlet leaders assisted in encouraging participation by clearly explaining the study’s objectives and the potential benefits of involvement.

Data collection also encountered practical challenges. These included the frequent absence of household heads during the day, language barriers, and the risk of social desirability bias. To address these issues, several strategies were implemented. Households were revisited in the evenings when respondents were more likely to be at home. Hamlet leaders provided translation support and facilitated communication where language barriers existed.

To reduce social desirability bias, data collectors made efforts to build rapport with participants before asking sensitive questions. This helped create a trusting and comfortable environment, encouraging more honest responses. Participants were explicitly informed that their genuine answers were essential to the accuracy and success of the study. They were reassured that there were no right or wrong responses and that honesty was valued over socially acceptable answers.

Despite these limitations, the study offers valuable insights into the utilization of adequately iodized salt and the factors influencing its use, particularly in rural areas with local salt producers. These findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge and can inform future interventions aimed at improving iodine nutrition in similar settings.

Conclusion

The utilization of adequately iodized salt in Kilwa District remains low, influenced by factors such as family size, knowledge gaps, improper storage, exposure to sunlight, and prolonged storage time. Local salt producers also contribute to poor availability due to non-compliance with iodization standards.

To address this, the Ministry of Health should implement targeted awareness campaigns on the benefits and proper handling of iodized salt. The CHMT and TFNC must also strengthen enforcement of regulations prohibiting the sale of non-iodized salt. Securing production sites in regions like Lindi is essential to ensure consistent supply and prevent theft.

At the community level, engaging village health workers can promote behavior change and increase household-level use of iodized salt.

A coordinated approach involving regulation, education, and supply chain protection is vital to eliminate iodine deficiency.

Furthermore, education plays a crucial role in changing household behaviors and increasing the acceptance and consistent use of iodized salt. Enhancing community based educational initiatives, including school programs and local health talks, can effectively improve awareness and dispel misconceptions about iodized salt. Incorporating education strategies into national policies can create a sustained impact on iodized salt utilization.

In addition to these strategies, developing a comprehensive national policy on iodized salt utilization is essential to guide government actions aimed at improving iodized salt use. Such policies should focus on strengthening regulatory frameworks, supporting small-scale producers, and ensuring equitable access across communities. Implementing clear, actionable policies will enhance the effectiveness of interventions and facilitate the long-term goal of eliminating iodine deficiency in the region. Future research should explore the salt value chain, challenges faced by small-scale producers, and household beliefs influencing usage to inform more tailored interventions.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Dataset used for the analysis of utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in rural areas of Kilwa District, Lindi Region, Tanzania, 2023. This file contains anonymized individual-level data used to generate all results presented in the manuscrip.

(XLSX)

pone.0337337.s001.xlsx (70.2KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We would want to thank everyone who took the time to ensure that this task was completed. I appreciate the heads of households from Kilwa district who participated in this study and the Ward Executive Officers from five wards for their assistance during data collection. I’m also grateful to Mr. Adolf Kalombo and Joseph Kimambo for assisting me in collecting the data at the field.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centre of Excellence in Health Monitoring and Evaluation, Mzumbe University under the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Project Cooperative Agreement No: NU2GGH002292. Additionally, they provide support in the training of residents in Tanzania’s Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program.

References

  • 1.Menyanu E, Corso B, Minicuci N, Rocco I, Zandberg L, Baumgartner J, et al. Salt-reduction strategies may compromise salt iodization programs: learnings from South Africa and Ghana. Nutrition. 2021;84:111065. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.111065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Assey VD, Peterson S, Kimboka S, Ngemera D, Mgoba C, Ruhiye DM, et al. Tanzania national survey on iodine deficiency: impact after twelve years of salt iodation. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vincent DA. Controlling iodine deficiency disorders through salt iodation in Tanzania. 2009.
  • 4.Pandav CS, Yadav K, Srivastava R, Pandav R, Karmarkar MG. Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) control in India. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(3):418–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun D, Codling K, Chang S, Zhang S, Shen H, Su X, et al. Eliminating Iodine Deficiency in China: Achievements, Challenges and Global Implications. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):361. doi: 10.3390/nu9040361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD. Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination. Clin Nutr. 2014;28(2):1–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okosieme OE. Impact of iodination on thyroid pathology in Africa. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(8):396–401. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wächter W, Mvungi M, König A, Pickardt CR, Scriba PC. Prevalence of goitre and hypothyroidism in Southern Tanzania: effect of iodised oil on thyroid hormone deficiency. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;40(1):86–91. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.1.86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hetzel BS. Eliminating iodine deficiency disorders--the role of the International Council in the global partnership. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(5):410–3; discussion 413-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mannar MGV, Bohac L. Achieving Universal salt iodization: lesson learned and emerging issues. 2008;1–18.
  • 11.United Republic of Tanzania. Tanzania National nutrition survey 2018. 2019.
  • 12.Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. SSRN Electron J. 2018;5(2):18–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kelle U. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(4):293–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.United Republic of Tanzania. Lindi region investment guide. 2019.
  • 15.Israel GD. Determining sample size 1. 1992.
  • 16.Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gill SL. Qualitative sampling methods. J Hum Lact. 2020;36(4):579–81. doi: 10.1177/0890334420949218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mekonnen TC, Eshete S, Wasihun Y, Arefaynie M, Cherie N. Availability of adequately iodized salt at household level in Dessie and Combolcha Towns, South Wollo, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6066-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Al-Dakheel MH, Haridi HK, Al-Bashir BM, Al-Shangiti AM, Al-Shehri SN, Hussein I. Assessment of household use of iodized salt and adequacy of salt iodization: a cross-sectional national study in Saudi Arabia. Nutr J. 2018;17(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carmelle M-A, Victoire A, Achille Y, Boris S, Florence A, Roger GJ, et al. Validation of the use of spectrophotometer (WYD iodine checker) for the determination of iodine in food salt. Afr J Food Sci. 2018;12(2):15–20. doi: 10.5897/ajfs2017.1656 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Natl Bur Stat United Repub Tanzania. Household budget survey main report. Tanzania: Natl Bur Stat United Repub Tanzania; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yaye AB, Baraki N, Endale BS. Availability of adequately iodized salt at household level and associated factors in Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia. IJPHS. 2016;5(4):392. doi: 10.11591/.v5i4.4841 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Willtsher F. Qualitative social research. Forum Qual Sozialforsch/ Forum Qual Soc Res. 2011;12(1):345–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hamed Hilal A, Said Alabri S. Using NVivo for data analysis in qualitative research. Int Interdiscip J Educ. 2013;2(2):181–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tariku WB, Mazengia AL. Knowledge and utilization of iodized salt and its associated factors at household level in Mecha district, Northwest Ethiopia. J Nutr Metab. 2019;2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salt Research Institute of China. WYD iodine checker instruction manual. Salt Research Institute of China; 2003. https://mnsurvey.nutritionintl.org [Google Scholar]
  • 27.T F D A. Iodated salt regulations. 2010.
  • 28.Mamo W, Derso T, Nigatu SG. Adequately iodized salt utilization and associated factors among households in Tach Armachio District, Northwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. J Nutr Metab. 2021;2021:6630450. doi: 10.1155/2021/6630450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desta AA, Kulkarni U, Abraha K, Worku S, Sahle BW. Iodine level concentration, coverage of adequately iodized salt consumption and factors affecting proper iodized salt utilization among households in North Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. BMC Nutr. 2019;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40795-019-0291-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sai Deepika P, Thirumala Rao B, Vamsi A, Valleswary K, Chandra Sekhar M. A cross sectional study on proper use of iodized salt in communities of rural areas and its relevant factors in Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019;6(3):1083. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20190590 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bhardwaj AK, Kumar S, Singh M, Sood A. Household coverage with adequately iodized salt and practices affecting iodine content of salt at household level in two sub- Himalayan districts. 2022;03(04).
  • 32.Kebebew E, Derese T, Bogale G, Berhane A. Iodine concentration level, availability of adequately iodised salt and proper utilisation, and its influencing factors among households in Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Dinka AW, Kebebe T, Nega G. Iodine level of salt and associated factors at household level in Gidami district, Oromia region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Nutr Diet Suppl. 2021;13:9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anteneh ZA, Engidayehu M, Abeje G. Iodine content of dietary salt at household level and associated factors using Iodometric titration methods in Dera District, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Nutr. 2017;3:83. doi: 10.1186/s40795-017-0203-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abera T, Wondimu R, Kaba Z. Utilization of iodized salt and associated factors among pregnant mothers in Kimbibit District, North Shoa Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. AJHR. 2021;9(3):89. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.UNICEF. Problems and solutions to improve the Madagascar iodized salt programme. UNICEF Madagascar. 2020. https://www.unicef.org/madagascar/en/reports/problems-and-solutions-improve-madagascar-iodized-salt-programme [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Democratic Republic of Nepal. Iodized salt (Production, sale and distribution) act. 2010. 1–17.
  • 38.Assey VD, Tylleskär T, Momburi PB, Maganga M, Mlingi NV, Reilly M, et al. Improved salt iodation methods for small-scale salt producers in low-resource settings in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Charles Okpala

10 Mar 2025

Dear Dr. Mrema,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 24 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: This work is supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centre of Excellence in Health Monitoring and Evaluation, Mzumbe University under the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Project Cooperative Agreement No: NU2GGH002292. Additionally, they provide support in the training of residents in Tanzania's Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program. 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

Major revisions required

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: he manuscript presents important findings with public health implications. However, some revision need to improve it.

Language and Typographical Errors: Correct grammatical issues such as (e.g., "expose of salt" → "exposure of salt"; "AnIodine rapid test" → "An iodine rapid test").

• The introduction ends with a detailed explanation of the study's purpose, but it could be more concise. For example, the sentence "By knowing the current prevalence of households utilizing iodized salts, factors associated with iodized salt utilization and reasons for adequate availability of iodized salt in the community among local salt producers in Kilwa, the government through TFNC will be able to design appropriate intervention to improve the coverage of household and to help local salt producers to produce salt which is adequately iodized" is quite long and could be broken into smaller, more digestible sentences. In addition, the introduction provides good background information, but it should more clearly outline the research gap

Methodology:

Provide more detail on the iodine testing methodology

Disscusion

The discussion jumps between different findings and comparisons without a clear transition. For instance, the section on family size (lines 301–311) is followed by a discussion on knowledge (lines 312–318), then storage practices (lines 319–328), and then time to stay with salt (lines 329–334). While these are all relevant, the flow could be improved by grouping related findings together

Reviewer #2: Comments and recommendations for the author:

Abstract:

(a) Your abstract should adhere to the journal's format, presented as a single continuous paragraph while incorporating all necessary components

Introduction:

(a) Please ensure consistency in the WHO iodine intake recommendation unit—whether it is in micrograms or grams. Kindly review and revise the reference statement accordingly in lines 51-54 and throughout the manuscript.

Study Design & Justification:

(a) Why was a cross-sectional design chosen for this study, and how does it adequately address the study objectives

(b) Were any potential biases considered in selecting the Kilwa district as the study area

Sampling Methodology:

(a) How was the sample size of 493 households determined? Were design effects or response rates considered

(b) Can the authors provide more justification for the choice of systematic sampling and how it ensures representativeness

(c) What steps were taken to minimize selection bias, particularly for the qualitative component

Data Collection & Quality Control:

(a) Were there any challenges encountered during data collection, and how were they mitigated

(b) How was the accuracy of iodine measurement ensured, particularly for the WYD machine analysis

(c) Can the authors clarify whether the same research assistants collected both qualitative and quantitative data? If so, were they trained to avoid interviewer bias

Data Analysis:

(a) What measures were taken to address missing data, if any

(b) Why was a p-value threshold of 0.2 used for bivariable analysis inclusion

(c) Were any adjustments made for clustering in the two-stage sampling approach

Ethical Considerations:

(a) How was confidentiality maintained during in-depth interviews, considering the sensitivity of some responses

(b) Were participants informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time without consequences

Clarity and Rationale

(a) The study highlights a significantly low proportion (9.4%) of households utilizing adequately iodized salt. Could the authors provide more context on national or regional policies regarding salt iodization and enforcement?

(b) The discussion compares findings to various studies in Ethiopia and India. Why were these specific regions chosen for comparison? Are there studies within Tanzania or East Africa that might offer more relevant comparisons

Methodology

(a) What was the sampling technique used to select the 435 households? Was it random sampling, stratified sampling, or another method

(b) The study mentions binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Could the authors clarify if they conducted any model diagnostics (e.g., goodness-of-fit tests) to assess the reliability of their findings

(c) The manuscript states that cultural beliefs were associated with salt utilization in the binary regression but were not significant in the multivariable model. Could the authors elaborate on potential confounders that might have led to this change in significance

Findings and Interpretation

(a) The study identifies a strong association between salt storage conditions and iodine retention. Were other household practices, such as cooking methods (e.g., adding salt before or after boiling), considered as potential factors

(b) The role of knowledge about iodized salt is emphasized in the discussion. Did the study assess the sources of knowledge (e.g., health campaigns, media, school education) to better understand how information dissemination could be improved

Limitations and Recommendations

(a) Were there any limitations regarding data collection, such as social desirability bias, especially in self-reported knowledge about iodized salt

(b) The authors recommend working with local salt producers to ensure a reliable iodized salt supply. Have there been any past interventions in Tanzania to improve iodized salt availability, and how effective were they

Recommendations for Improvement:

1. Clarify Study Area Selection:

� Provide more details on why Kilwa was considered the "worst-performing" district in Lindi beyond citing an unpublished TFNC report. If possible, reference publicly available data.

2. Improve Sampling Justification:

� Explain why different selection intervals were used for different wards.

� Justify the choice of convenience sampling for local production sites and discuss potential limitations.

3. Enhance Methodological Transparency:

� Provide more information on how qualitative data saturation was determined.

� Clarify whether data collectors were blinded to the iodine content of the salt samples to reduce potential bias.

4. Strengthen Data Analysis Explanation:

� Explain whether and how potential confounders were accounted for in the logistic regression model.

� Provide a rationale for why NVivo was chosen for qualitative data analysis over other possible methods.

5. Address Ethical and Practical Considerations:

� Explicitly state whether informed consent was obtained from all participants for audio recording.

� Discuss how potential risks to participants were minimized, especially for local salt producers.

6. Data Presentation & Clarity

� The manuscript refers to Figure 2 but does not describe it in detail. A more explicit explanation of the figure’s content would improve readability.

7. Methodology Enhancement

� If feasible, provide details on how "good knowledge" about iodized salt was assessed. Was there a standardized questionnaire or knowledge scale used?

8. Further Discussion and Implications

� Given the cultural preference for non-iodized salt, it would be useful to suggest culturally sensitive education strategies that address local misconceptions.

� The study highlights financial barriers to iodized salt use. Can the authors discuss possible government subsidies or pricing strategies to improve affordability?

9. Policy and Public Health Recommendations

� Advocate for stricter enforcement of salt iodization policies, similar to Nepal's Iodized Salt Act, as a potential regulatory approach for Tanzania.

� Suggest community-level initiatives, such as engagement with village health workers, to educate and promote adequately iodized salt utilization.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  NUHA Al-Aghbari

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-02467-review.docx

pone.0337337.s002.docx (226.3KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS ONE REVIEWER COMMENTS.docx

pone.0337337.s003.docx (22.3KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-02467.docx

pone.0337337.s004.docx (13.1KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2025 Nov 24;20(11):e0337337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337337.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


25 Jun 2025

We express our gratitude to the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments, which have significantly enhanced our manuscript titled " Utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Tanzania rural areas: a case of Kilwa district, Lindi region, 2023". We have considered all the comments and integrated their suggestions into the revised version of the manuscript. We believe that we have effectively addressed the raised concerns and that, after incorporating the changes, our manuscript is now appropriate for publication.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments.docx

pone.0337337.s006.docx (31.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Charles Okpala

14 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Mrema,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:  ***(Carefully adhere to instructions given below)***

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 28 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Authors, thank you for your patience. Reviewers have considered your revised manuscript for publication. Please, before it can be accepted, some additional touches are needed, as below:

a) In the introduction, a number of places need to improvement. Firstly, the objective must be clearly stated as the very last sentence " To supplement existing literature, therefore, this current work assessed household utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Kilwa district, which is among Tanzania rural areas, and this was performed by way of cross-sectional design across local salt producers" (Please insert this sentence in current line 86).

Now, let's look at the overall introduction. It is not yet complete. Merge line 48-63 as one paragraph. Also, merge lines 77-86 as one paragraph. This will give 4 paragraphs in total. Before talking about USI in Tanzania, please, create a new paragraph to talk about salt production process in Tanzania. Tell us the steps of salt production, tell us the number of salt makers in Tanzania, tell us how their packaging looks like, tell us how many people generally work in a typical local salt producer, tell us their pattern of salt product distribution, tell us about affordability of salt (sources of this information could be newspapers, government bulletins, personal communication), I expect this will likely be one strong paragraph, at the maximum two strong paragraphs

b) Go to the methods,change the title of "2. Study methodology" (not "Materials and methods"). Now, begin this section by creating a new subsection called "Schematic overview of study program", which would comprise 5 sentences, and supported compulsorily by a flow diagram that shows the major methodology steps that built the entire study. Sentence one must introduce the flow diagram, sentence two briefly outlines the major stages, sentence 3 links the flow diagram with the objective of this work, sentence 4 tells us why this approach is unique, sentence 5 tells us how this steps were validated.

After this section called "Schematic overview of study program", the next section must be "Questionnaire development process". Tell us, how did you develop the questionnaire (the research instrument)? how did you use specialist experience/expertise and knowledge together with synthesised relevant literature to come up with the questionnaire items? How did you develop the questionnaire contents, and did you do content validation? After the validation process, who subsequently approved the questionnaire? Is it the association body for the local salt producers (just curious)? Was there any prerequisite conditions set out for questionnaire participation? Tell us about the arrangement of the actual questionnaire, how many pages, how many items in total, and the major sections. (Make sure to include aspects of this in the flow diagram, and mention it tinyly in the " "Schematic overview of study program" section) . How did you differentiate between Semi Structured and pre-tested questionnaires? what was the main purpose to do so?

c) Please amend "Study design, area and population under the study" to "Study design, area and population"

The rest of the 2. Study methodology" is ok

d) Results and discussion are excellent. Please, in the discussion, make best effort to capture all the tables mentioned in the results. Use "(Refer to Table ?) in all the places where data is each table is discussed

e) Before conclusion, I believe that there were limitations that you encountered, please create a new section, "Challenges and limitations of current study", make sure to brainstorm on limitations you encountered in developing the questionnaire, developing the entire methods, assembling the data, analyzing the data, discussing the findings, logistical challenges, administrative challenges, etc. Maximum, two paragraphs. Authors apply your kind discretion to develop this section.

f) in the conclusion, provide clear direction for future study. Also, what is the take home lesson for policy makers and other stakeholders.

Look forward to your revised manuscript. Please, attend to every single bit of these comments. The editor will thoroughly examine every single point one by one. I believe if all are diligently implemented, this work will be of higher quality.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Thank you for addressing my comments thoroughly. I appreciate that your response aligns with the suggestion I provided. I’m glad to see the revisions have been made accordingly, and I have no further concerns regarding this point.

Wishing you all the best in the publication process.

Reviewer #2: The authors have significantly improved their manuscript on iodized salt utilization in Tanzania's Kilwa district through comprehensive revisions. They clarified methodological details, strengthened discussions with refined comparisons and policy implications, improved result presentations, addressed ethical considerations and biases, and provided actionable recommendations including culturally sensitive education strategies. These revisions resolve all major concerns and meet journal standards. I recommend acceptance for publication in PLOS ONE.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  NUHA AMER Al-Aghbari

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Jonah Bawa Adokwe PhD

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Nov 24;20(11):e0337337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337337.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


26 Aug 2025

We express our gratitude to the editor for their valuable comments, which have significantly improved our manuscript titled " Utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Tanzania rural areas: a case of Kilwa district, Lindi region, 2023". We have carefully revised our manuscript addressing all comments and suggestions provided by the editor. We believe that we have effectively addressed the raised concerns and that, after incorporating the changes, our manuscript is now appropriate for publication.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to editors comments.docx

pone.0337337.s007.docx (19.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Charles Okpala

24 Sep 2025

Dear Dr. Mrema,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 08 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please, kindly attend to the comments raised as diligently and detailed as possible

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #3: Utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Tanzania rural areas:

a case of Kilwa district, Lindi region, 2023

This is quite a good research report. Although the study was conducted on a small scale, it is meaningful and necessary for many regions in African countries where people’s awareness of the importance of iodized salt in food remains low. The study also collected a relatively large sample size, sufficient for analysis and assessment of iodized salt utilization in the research area. The information presented in the supplementary materials is also quite interesting and diverse. The methodology and data analysis methods applied are appropriate.

However, the research results have not been evaluated and discussed from multiple perspectives, which shows that the study has not fully exploited the data collected. In particular, the information collected from 4 wards (namely: Kiranjeranje, Mandawa, Miteja, and Tingi), further divided into 12 villages (namely: Kiranjeranje, Kiswele, Mbwemkuru, Mtandi, Mandawa, Mitumba, Hotel tatu, Kiwawa, Sinza, Matandu, Kibaoni, Njia nne, and Mtandango), has not been analyzed in detail at the smaller administrative unit level. The study results are presented only in Figure 1, which is too simple and sketchy. The paper should include more results in the form of charts to demonstrate thorough data processing, especially results related to educational level, gender, age, and iodized salt usage.

I have some concerns regarding the proportion of survey respondents. The age group 26–35 accounted for a very large number of respondents (252), while other age groups were underrepresented. In particular, the group under 25 years old was very limited (only 16 respondents under 18 and 28 respondents aged 18–25). This group is crucial for nutritional development and represents the future of the country, so such a small number of responses may lead to results that are not truly representative. Could you clarify whether, among the survey participants, there were any individuals suffering from iodine deficiency-related diseases?

The conclusion section should include additional policy recommendations to help the government address this issue. I believe that education is also an important aspect, which was mentioned at the beginning of the paper but not discussed in the conclusion. If possible, a separate section on policy recommendations for the government to improve iodized salt utilization should be developed, which would make the paper much more practically valuable.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Trung Quang Nguyen

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Nov 24;20(11):e0337337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337337.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 3


5 Nov 2025

We have considered all the comments and integrated their suggestions into the revised version of the manuscript. We believe that we have effectively addressed the raised concerns and that, after incorporating the changes, our manuscript is now appropriate for publication.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_comments_auresp_3.docx

pone.0337337.s008.docx (20.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Charles Okpala

6 Nov 2025

Utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in Tanzania rural areas: a case of Kilwa district, Lindi region, 2023

PONE-D-25-02467R3

Dear Dr. Mrema,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you very much for your revised work. Accepted for publication

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Charles Okpala

PONE-D-25-02467R3

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mrema,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Dataset used for the analysis of utilization of adequately iodized salt and its associated factors in rural areas of Kilwa District, Lindi Region, Tanzania, 2023. This file contains anonymized individual-level data used to generate all results presented in the manuscrip.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0337337.s001.xlsx (70.2KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-02467-review.docx

    pone.0337337.s002.docx (226.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS ONE REVIEWER COMMENTS.docx

    pone.0337337.s003.docx (22.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-02467.docx

    pone.0337337.s004.docx (13.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments.docx

    pone.0337337.s006.docx (31.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to editors comments.docx

    pone.0337337.s007.docx (19.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_comments_auresp_3.docx

    pone.0337337.s008.docx (20.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES