Abstract
This study examines the occurrence and ecological risks of phthalate esters (PAEs) and bisphenol A (BPA) in raw urban wastewater from Bushehr, a coastal city in the northern Persian Gulf. PAEs, used as plasticizers, and BPA, found in various consumer products, are endocrine disruptors that pose environmental and health threats. The research evaluates the concentrations, distribution, and sources of these pollutants and assesses their ecological risks. Wastewater samples were collected from six discharge stations along the Bushehr coastline between February and April 2023. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), seven PAE compounds, including dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and di-octyl phthalate (DOP), alongside BPA were analyzed. DEHP emerged as the dominant PAE, with concentrations ranging from 19.67 to 39.75 µg/L, while BPA levels ranged from 0.10 to 2.50 µg/L, peaking at Rishehr Park. Ecological risk assessment, conducted using the risk quotient (RQ) method, revealed that DEHP posed a high ecological risk (RQ > 1) to sensitive aquatic species. These findings highlight the urgent need for improved wastewater treatment and pollution control to safeguard marine ecosystems and public health. The study contributes valuable insights into the contamination levels and sources of PAEs and BPA in the northern Persian Gulf, advancing the understanding of regional marine pollution and its ecological impacts.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-25697-8.
Keywords: Phthalate esters, Bisphenol A, Emerging contaminants, Ecological risk assessment, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Persian gulf, Bushehr
Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Ocean sciences
Introduction
The oil and petrochemical industry, shipping, dredging, mining, residential, fishing, agriculture, ballast water discharging, and extremely hazardous substances input are the critical environmental pressures on marine ecosystems1–8. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as phthalate esters (PAEs) and bisphenol A (BPA) are considered emerging contaminants that harm human health, aquatic life, and the environment9–11. Among these, PAEs represent one of the most prevalent and widely studied groups of EDCs due to their extensive industrial applications and environmental persistence. PAEs have been used as additives, humectants, plasticizers, antifoaming agents, and carriers in different industrial products12,13. PAEs are commonly used in many sources such as household materials (house fittings, garments, cosmetic products, children’s dolls, packaging), building materials, industrial products (paints and varnishes, adhesives, greases, polishes, washers, electronics, toners, pesticides, insecticides, fertilizers), and others (i.e., medicines, medical instruments)11,14,15. PAEs are identified in the environment at different concentration levels after their discharge into aquatic environments16–19. Six PAE compounds, including dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and di-octyl phthalate (DOP), are on the priority list of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) due to their persistence, bioaccumulation, and endocrine-disrupting potential19,20.
The health threats posed by PAEs and their potential ecotoxicological effects have been identified21–23. Various health problems, such as allergies, asthma, an abnormal reproductive system, and reproductive failure, have been linked to PAE exposure11,24. Different pathways, including oral exposure, inhalation, skin contact, and ingestion, are the main human exposure routes to PAEs11,25,26. PAEs may exist in different environmental matrices/samples such as air, soils, sediments, surface water, and wastewater11. Wastewater and sewage effluents are the main routes that release PAEs into the environment27. Thus, raw wastewater represents an important source for the release of PAEs into the environment, such as receiving water bodies21,28–30, which is an increasingly severe threat to global public health and has become a concern. Therefore, it is vital to determine the level of PAEs in water to protect the aquatic ecosystem and their consequent ecological risk to marine biota.
BPA is another persistent organic and emerging contaminant identified in aquatic environments in different concentrations31,32. Regarding the noticeable estrogenic and/or anti-androgenic potential of BPA in humans and wildlife, as well as its toxic effects on brain and behavioral development and mammary glands in diverse organisms, this chemical is categorized as an EDC [9]. In 2010, the US EPA included BPA on its Concern List as a compound that may risk harming the environment (Bisphenol A Action Plan, 2010). Effluent discharge from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), landfill leachates, burning of domestic waste, and degradation of plastic litter are the primary postconsumer sources of this chemical9,33,34. BPA enters marine environments through untreated wastewater33,35. Therefore, the eco-toxicological effects of BPA are a crucial issue, and it is important to assess the environmental risks caused by this chemical36.
The presence of emerging contaminants such as PAEs and BPA in aquatic environments has become a growing concern due to their widespread use, persistence, and potential ecological and human health risks. These compounds are commonly found in various industrial and consumer products and are frequently detected in municipal wastewater. Chemical analysis methods for identifying and quantifying these contaminants in untreated urban wastewater are still under development, and implementing effective quality control measures remains a challenge.
To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported the concentration levels of PAEs and BPA in raw urban wastewater in the northern part of the Persian Gulf. Therefore, in this study, the authors aimed to (i) determine the concentration levels, distribution, and sources of PAEs and BPA in untreated urban wastewater entering Bushehr coastal waters, and (ii) conduct an ecological risk assessment of these contaminants in raw wastewater discharged into the Bushehr coastal zone.
Materials and methods
Study area and sampling
Bushehr is a seaside town (28° 92’34’’ N, 50° 82’03’’ E) located in the north of the Persian Gulf and is the third-largest city in the south of Iran, with a total population of about 223,504 in 2017 (Statistical Center of Iran, 2017). Bushehr city suffers from the lack of collection and a proper treatment process of urban wastewater, as well as runoff due to weather conditions and heavy rains in the rainy season. Around 38,000 m3 of municipal wastewater is produced daily in this city. A significant part of the generated wastewater is discharged directly into the sea without any treatment along the beach.
Raw urban wastewater samples were collected from February to April 2023 from six discharge stations along the Bushehr coastline (Fig. 1). A total of 30 samples were collected, with five samples taken from each of the following sites: Shif Island (Station 1), Jofreh Wharf (Station 2), Solh Abad Wharf (Station 3), Siadat Park (Station 4), Jalali Wharf (Station 5), and Rishehr Park (Station 6). All samples were collected in 100 mL pre-cleaned amber glass bottles (Thermo Scientific; cleaned in the laboratory with acetone, hexane and methanol), transported to the laboratory, and filtered through 0.45 μm pore size nylon membrane filters (Whatman) to eliminate suspended particles. The bottles were then covered with aluminum foil and stored at 4 °C until further analysis.
Fig. 1.
The locations of the sampling stations (the map was created using Esri ArcMap, version 10.3, which is available at https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.0/.).
During the sampling campaign, key physicochemical parameters of the untreated urban wastewater were measured in situ using a multi-parameter probe (Multi 3630 manufactured by WTW (Germany)). These included temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC). The measured values ranged from 26.8 to 31.5 °C for temperature, 7.1 to 7.3 for pH, and 2430 to 3126 µS/cm for EC.
Chemical analysis
PAEs
The extraction protocol for PAEs in seawater samples was adapted from Hajiouni et al.37. Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) was performed using a separatory funnel. Briefly, 100 mL of filtered seawater was combined with 20 mL of dichloromethane and 20 µL of benzyl benzoate (Merck, Germany) as an internal standard. The mixture was vigorously shaken to facilitate the transfer of PAEs into the organic phase. The organic extract was then transferred into clean glass dishes and sequentially rinsed with dichloromethane, acetone, and n-hexane (all from Merck, Germany) to remove impurities. The cleaned extract was stored at 4 °C until analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
PAEs were analyzed using an Agilent 7890 GC/5975 MSD system (USA) equipped with a J&W-5MS ultra inert column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 mm film thickness).
The GC oven temperature was programmed as follows: initial temperature of 70 °C (held for 1 min), increased to 300 °C at 10 °C/min, and held for 7 min. A 1 µL injection was made using pulsed splitless mode at 290 °C. The helium carrier gas (purity 99.999%) was set at a constant flow of 1 mL/min. Retention times for the analyzed PAEs ranged from 13.4 to 30.4 min for DMP and DOP, respectively. The mass spectrometer’s source and quadrupole temperatures were maintained at 230 °C and 150 °C, respectively. Data were processed using Agilent ChemStation software (E.02.01.1177), and quantification was based on peak areas. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.10 to 2.11 ng/L and 0.34 to 6.97 ng/L, respectively. Characteristic ions for quantification included m/z 149 and 163 and retention times of 13.40 to 30.40 min. Table S1 shows precursor and product ions for PAEs analyzed in this study.
BPA
The extraction of BPA was based on protocols from Santhi et al.38. A 100 mL seawater samples was acidified to pH 2–3 using a 1:1 (v/v) nitric acid solution. BPA-d16 (50 ng) was added as an internal standard. Samples were passed through pre-conditioned C18 cartridges. The cartridges were first rinsed with 6 mL of an acetone: hexane (1:1) mixture, followed by 10 mL of methanol and 10 mL of water, each at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. After sample loading (at 4 mL/min), the cartridges were flushed with 6 mL of water and dried under vacuum for 30 min. Elution was performed using four 2.5 mL aliquots of acetone: hexane (1:1), and the eluates were evaporated under nitrogen. The residue was reconstituted in 100 µL of acetone: hexane (1:1), followed by derivatization using 20 µL of N, O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) with 1% Trimethylsilyl (TMS) at 75 °C for 40 min. A 1 µL aliquot was then injected into the GC-MS.
BPA quantification was carried out using an Agilent 7890 GC/5975 MSD (Agilent, USA), following methods from Szyrwinska et al.39 and Al-Saleh et al.40. Separation was achieved using an Agilent J&W-5MS ultra-inert column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 mm film thickness). The temperature program was as follows: initial hold at 80 °C for 2 min, ramping to 285 °C at 8 °C/min, with a final hold of 2 min. Injections were made in pulsed splitless mode with helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 mL/min. The MS source and quadrupole temperatures were set at 230 °C and 150 °C, respectively, with an interface temperature of 290 °C. BPA was quantified in SIM mode using a target ion of m/z 285 and qualifier ions of m/z 285 and 357 (Table S1). The method showed a recovery of 86.9%, with LOD and LOQ values of 1 ng/L and 3.5 ng/L, respectively.
Additionally, 1 mL of each raw wastewater sample was spiked with 40 µg/L d16-BPA and evaporated at 60 °C. The residue was derivatized with 300 µL of N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) containing 1% Trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), vortexed, and incubated at 75 °C for 1 h. Samples were then reconstituted in chloroform. Calibration standards (5–160 µg/L) were prepared daily from 1 µg/mL stock solutions of BPA and d16-BPA in methanol. Prior to GC-MS injection, 50 µL of MSTFA was added to the final extract and incubated at 50 °C for 1 h.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.00, and a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. For samples with values below the limit of detection (LOD), the amount was set to LOD/2 in the statistical analysis.
Results and discussion
Distribution and occurrence of PAEs and BPA
The composition and levels of individual PAEs in marine environments are crucial for identifying their sources, distribution, and movement41. The mean concentrations of PAEs in raw urban wastewater from six sampling sites ranged from < LOD to 0.67 µg/L for DMP, 0.29 to 0.92 µg/L for DEP, 0.51 to 1.52 µg/L for DIBP, 0.14 to 0.39 µg/L for DBP, and 19.67 to 39.75 µg/L for DEHP (Table 1). BBP and DOP were below the detection limit at all sites. PAE congeners were detected across all regions, indicating these compounds are prevalent pollutants in the area. The total ΣPAEs concentration ranged from 22.56 to 43.46 µg/L. Notably, the highest PAE levels were found at fishing wharfs (Solh Abad, Jofreh, and Jalali), characterized by significant urban wastewater input, fishing activities, and human presence.
Table 1.
The mean concentration levels of individual PAEs (µg/L) and BPA in Raw urban wastewater collected from six sampling sites (n: 5).
| Compounds | Shif Island | Rishehr Park | Jalali Wharf | Jofreh Wharf | Solh Abad Wharf | Siadat Park | p-value | LOD (ng/L) | LOQ (ng/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMP | < LOD | < LOD | 0.67 | 0.38 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.041 | 1.68 | 5.56 |
| DEP | 0.30 | 0.92 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.055 | 0.86 | 2.84 |
| DIBP | 0.51 | 0.68 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 1.52 | 1.24 | 0.002 | 0.71 | 2.39 |
| DBP | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.045 | 0.75 | 2.46 |
| BBP | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | 0.251 | 0.10 | 0.34 |
| DEHP | 19.67 | 30.02 | 35.12 | 38.00 | 39.75 | 19.84 | 0.001 | 1.67 | 5.50 |
| DOP | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | 0.125 | 2.11 | 6.97 |
| ΣPAEs | 22.56 | 33.75 | 38.59 | 41.36 | 43.46 | 23.24 | 0.001 | - | - |
| BPA | 0.10 | 2.50 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 3.50 |
Figure 2 illustrates the relative contributions of the PAE congeners, with DEHP being the predominant congener across all sampling sites, present in 100% of samples. The average DEHP concentrations were 39.75 ± 4.75 µg/L at Solh Abad Wharf, 38.00 ± 0.50 µg/L at Jofreh Wharf, 35.12 ± 1.28 µg/L at Jalali Wharf, 30.02 ± 0.89 µg/L at Rishehr Park, 19.84 ± 0.95 µg/L at Siadat Park, and 19.67 ± 0.91 µg/L at Shif Island (Table 1). The consistently higher concentrations of DEHP compared to other PAEs can be attributed to its widespread use as a plasticizer in the production of flexible plastics, packaging, and construction materials. These findings are consistent with previous studies identifying DEHP as the most prevalent PAE in municipal and runoff waters42–45.
Fig. 2.
Relative contributions of the PAEs congeners and BPA in raw wastewater samples of different sites.
For instance, Clara et al.45 reported DEHP and DEP as the dominant PAEs in runoff water in Austria. Similarly, Takdastan et al.46 detected DEHP in microplastics (MPs) during wastewater treatment, with mean concentrations ranging from 8.13 to 30.081 µg/L. Other studies have confirmed the presence of MPs in untreated urban wastewater47–50, and several have suggested an association between MPs and PAEs37,51,52. These relationships imply that plastic debris may act as a vector for PAE contamination through the leaching of additives.
Field observations revealed significant accumulations of plastic debris, particularly near wharves, where wastewater is discharged, primarily from domestic sources. The absence of notable agricultural or industrial inputs suggests that municipal waste and consumer product leachates are the main sources of PAEs in the area53.
Environmental factors such as salinity, temperature, and pH are known to influence the behavior and distribution of PAEs in aquatic systems54. The extreme physicochemical conditions of the Persian Gulf— characterized by elevated salinity and temperature— are known to accelerate plastic degradation and contribute to the accumulation of plastic debris55,56. Pollution by both MPs and PAEs has been reported in various parts of the Persian Gulf6,41,57, supporting the likelihood that these contaminants originate from multiple environmental matrices, including water, soil, and air.
Pollution by both MPs and PAEs has been reported in various parts of the Persian Gulf6,41,57, supporting the likelihood that these contaminants originate from multiple environmental matrices, including water, soil, and air.
In addition to PAEs, BPA was detected in all wastewater samples, with concentrations ranging from 0.10 to 2.50 µg/L. The highest concentration was found at Rishehr Park and the lowest at Shif Island, indicating a widespread presence of BPA in urban effluents. Statistical analysis revealed significant spatial differences in BPA concentrations (p < 0.001), likely reflecting variation in local wastewater sources and input intensities. The elevated level at Rishehr Park is attributed to the direct discharge of raw sewage into the coastal water, posing a potential health risk in an area frequently used for recreational swimming. Notably, in August 2022, visible water discoloration led the Bushehr Provincial Environmental Protection Department to declare the site unsafe for public use. In contrast, lower concentrations at Shif Island, a sandy island inhabited by a fishing community, reflect minimal wastewater discharge.
Average BPA concentrations across the sites were as follows: Solh Abad Wharf – 0.58 ± 0.01 µg/L, Jofreh Wharf – 0.41 ± 0.01 µg/L, Jalali Wharf – 0.56 ± 0.02 µg/L, Rishehr Park – 2.50 ± 0.03 µg/L, Siadat Park – 0.63 ± 0.02 µg/L, and Shif Island – 0.10 ± 0.00 µg/L (Table 1). BPA concentrations in untreated wastewater have been widely reported, primarily resulting from the leaching of epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics9,58–60. The BPA levels observed in this study are comparable to those observed in wastewater discharges in China61,62. Wang et al.62 reported mean BPA levels of 2.03 µg/L in influents of Chinese WWTPs, and Sun et al.61 observed concentrations ranging from 189 to 20,400 ng/L (0.189 to 20.4 µg/L) in wastewater samples from Xiamen. Variability in these concentrations often correlates with differences in wastewater sources and industrial activity63,64.
Other studies from the United States and India report comparatively lower influent BPA levels. For example, Xue and Kannan65 reported mean concentrations of 90.0 and 53.3 ng/L in two U.S. treatment plants, while Karthikraj and Kannan66 observed a mean of 1.1 ng/L in Indian WWTP influents. The higher concentrations in our study may reflect regional differences in chemical usage, treatment infrastructure, and removal efficiency.
BPA has been detected in a variety of aquatic environments, including rivers, ponds, and marine environments, often in the ng/L range67. However, concentrations are typically higher in wastewater discharges due to leaching from plastics and improper disposal9,58,60. Wastewater effluent is recognized as a major source of BPA in aquatic systems68, while discarded plastic debris and land-applied biosolids further contribute to environmental BPA loads.
The detection of both BPA and PAEs in all sampled discharges underscores their pervasive presence in coastal wastewater and highlights their continued input into the marine environment, even in regions with regulatory frameworks targeting these pollutants.
Ecological risk assessment
The presence of PAEs and BPA in aquatic environments raises serious concerns due to their known toxicity to marine life23,69. These compounds are recognized endocrine disruptors, capable of affecting hormonal regulation, immune responses, gene expression, and behavioral patterns in various marine organisms11,67. BPA, in particular, has demonstrated endocrine-disrupting effects in amphibians, invertebrates, and fish70.
To evaluate the environmental implications of BPA, the concentrations detected in wastewater were compared to the European Union’s predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) of 1.6 µg/L71. Except for Rishehr Park, BPA concentrations remained below this threshold, suggesting minimal immediate risk. However, it is important to note that the PNEC does not account for more sensitive organisms, such as mollusks, which may be affected at lower exposure levels68. For example, the EC10 for egg production in the freshwater snail Marisa cornuarietis is reported as low as 14.8 ng/L72. Thus, even low BPA concentrations in coastal waters may pose ecological threats, especially in areas with chronic exposure69. Although the effects of BPA on marine species remain underexplored, additional ecotoxicological data for sensitive taxa are essential for more accurate risk assessments67.
In this study, the environmental risks posed by BPA and PAEs were assessed using the risk quotient (RQ) approach, calculated by dividing the measured environmental concentration (MEC) by the PNEC73. MEC values were the concentrations of PAEs and BPA measured in the raw urban wastewater samples, and the PNEC was the predicted no-effect concentration for each compound. The USEPA ECOTOX database was used to evaluate critical/chronic toxicity data for PAEs on sensitive aquatic organisms (e.g., fish, crustaceans, and algae)74. The ecological risk was classified into three categories based on RQ values: low risk (RQ < 0.01), medium risk (0.01 < RQ < 1), and high risk (RQ > 1)73. The RQ values of the six PAEs in Persian Gulf water are presented in Table 2. The RQ values followed the order of DEHP > DBP > DEP > DMP. DEHP had RQ values above one in all studied areas (except Shif Island for fish), indicating a considerable risk to sensitive algae, crustaceans, and fish. Similar results were reported in studies of urban runoff along the Persian Gulf coastline37. RQ levels for other congeners were < 0.01, indicating a low risk for sensitive aquatic organisms.
Table 2.
Toxicity data of PAEs and BPA to the most sensitive aquatic species (fish, algae and crustaceans).
| PAEs | Non-target organism | NOEC (µg/L) | AF | PNEC (µg/L) | RQ values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shif Island | Rishehr Park | Jalali Wharf | Jofreh Wharf | Solh Abad Wharf | Siadat Park | |||||
| DMP |
Algae Crustaceans Fish |
10,000 9600 11,000 |
10 10 10 |
1000 960 1100 |
- - - |
- - - |
0.0007 0.0007 0.0006 |
0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 |
0.0002 0.002 0.0002 |
0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 |
| DEP |
Algae Crustaceans Fish |
8106 2700 1650 |
10 10 10 |
810.6 270 165 |
0.00037 0.001 0.002 |
0.001 0.003 0.006 |
0.0003 0.001 0.002 |
0.0004 0.001 0.002 |
0.0006 0.002 0.003 |
0.0007 0.002 0.003 |
| DIBP |
Algae Crustaceans Fish |
210 260 100 |
10 10 10 |
21 26 10 |
0.0067 0.005 0.014 |
0.009 0.007 0.019 |
0.016 0.012 0.033 |
0.015 0.01 0.031 |
0.018 0.015 0.039 |
0.018 0.015 0.039 |
| BBP | Fish | 900 | 100 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| DEHP |
Algae Crustaceans Fish |
100 42 300 |
10 10 10 |
10 4.24 30 |
1.97 4.64 0.66 |
3.00 7.08 1.02 |
3.50 8.28 1.17 |
3.80 8.96 1.27 |
3.97 9.37 1.32 |
1.98 4.68 0.66 |
| DOP | Crustaceans | 34 | 100 | 0.34 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BPA | Algae | 22,000 | 10 | 2200 | 4.5E-05 | 1.1E-03 | 2.5E-04 | 1.9E-04 | 2.6E-04 | 2.9E-04 |
| Daphnia | 39,000 | 10 | 3900 | 2.6E-05 | 6.4E-04 | 1.4E-04 | 1.1E-04 | 1.5E-04 | 1.6E-04 | |
| Fish | 3600 | 10 | 3600 | 2.8E-05 | 6.9E-04 | 1.6E-04 | 1.1E-04 | 1.6E-04 | 1.8E-04 | |
NOEC: No observed effect concentration; AF: Assessment factor; PNEC: Predicted no effect concentration.
For BPA, RQ values across all sampling sites were below 0.01, implying a low risk to the related sensitive aquatic species in the studied areas (Table 2). These results are consistent with findings from multi-country assessments, including those in China, Japan, South Korea, and India, where BPA generally posed low to moderate risk in freshwater environments69. In certain sections of the Yangtze River, however, RQ values for algae exceeded 0.1, indicating a potential medium risk to sensitive phytoplankton species such as Selenastrum capricornutum75.
The results of this study highlight that coastal waters in the northern Persian Gulf, particularly around Bushehr, are under significant ecological pressure from PAEs, especially DEHP. This aligns with findings from southern Thailand, where elevated PAE levels near wastewater outfalls were linked to impaired reproductive and endocrine functions in marine organisms23. The broader impacts of these pollutants extend to microbial community composition, enzyme activity, and food web dynamics. Given their bioaccumulative nature, PAEs and BPA may also affect higher trophic levels, including humans.
To mitigate these risks, we recommend that wastewater treatment facilities in coastal urban centers like Bushehr incorporate advanced treatment technologies capable of removing endocrine-disrupting compounds. Establishing long-term monitoring programs would facilitate early detection and response to contamination. Additionally, raising public awareness and enforcing stricter regulations on the production, use, and disposal of plastic-related products are crucial steps to reduce the influx of these harmful substances into marine ecosystems.
Conclusion
Urban raw wastewater is an important source of PAEs and BPA in the coastal areas of the Persian Gulf. This study identified significant concentrations of PAEs and BPA in raw wastewater samples from the northern Persian Gulf, especially at sites near human activities and urban wastewater discharges. The mean concentrations of PAEs and BPA in the urban raw wastewater from six selected stations ranged from 22.56 to 43.46 and 0.10 to 2.50 µg/L, respectively. DEHP was the predominant PAE in all areas, and its high RQ values indicate a significant environmental risk to sensitive aquatic organisms. BPA concentrations varied but were below the threshold for significant ecological risk. Our findings suggest that the discharge rate of PAEs from urban surface runoff into the Persian Gulf can be substantial. Since urban wastewater in Bushehr is discharged without treatment, further studies are needed to provide comprehensive data on PAEs and BPA levels in environmental matrices, their exposure, and risk assessments of these endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Additionally, risk assessments are necessary to better understand the health risks associated with seafood consumption. Comprehensive experimental studies can also assess the environmental fate of BPA and other exposure pathways, enable better prediction and understand of potential risks to human and environmental health. Based on our results, it is highly recommended to cease the discharge of materials containing phthalates and BPA into the Bushehr coastline. Bushehr authorities must implement effective policies to prevent further contamination.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with research funding from the Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science (INIOAS) and Tarbiat Modares University. The authors would like to thank their financial support.
Author contributions
Farshid Soleimani: Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing– original draft; Mortaza Tavakoli: Supervision, Conceptualization, Project administration; Maryam Ghaemi: Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Mortaza Tavakoli, Email: m-tavakoli@modares.ac.ir.
Maryam Ghaemi, Email: maryam.ghaemy@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Sheppard, C., et al. The Gulf: a young sea in decline. Mar. Pollut. Bull.60 (1), 13–38 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Soleimani, F., Dobaradaran, S., Hayati, A., Khorsand, M., and Keshtkar, M. Data on metals (Zn, Al, Sr, and Co) and metalloid (As) concentration levels of ballast water in commercial ships entering Bushehr port, along the Persian Gulf. Data Brief9, 429 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Soleimani, F., et al. Fluoride and chloride levels in ballast water in commercial ships entering Bushehr port on the Persian Gulf. Fluoride50 (1), 121–126 (2017).
- 4.Dobaradaran, S., Soleimani, F., Nabipour, I., Saeedi, R., and Mohammadi, M. J. Heavy metal levels of ballast waters in commercial ships entering Bushehr Port along the Persian Gulf. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 126, 74–76 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Soleimani, F., et al. Assessment of microbial and physiochemical quality of ballast water in commercial ships entering Bushehr port, along the Persian Gulf. Desalin. Water Treat. 98, 190–195 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kor, K. and Mehdinia, A. Neustonic microplastic pollution in the Persian Gulf. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 150, 110665 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghaemi, M., Soleimani, F., Arfaeinia, H., and Gholamipour, S. Distribution, environmental risks, and conservation challenges of chemical pollutants in Persian Gulf marine protected areas. Sci. Rep.14 (1), 26343 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Ghaemi, M., Soleimani, F. & Gholamipour, S. Heavy metal and persistent organic pollutant profile of sediments from marine protected areas: the northern Persian Gulf. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.30 (57), 120877–120891 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Flint, S., Markle, T., Thompson, S., & Wallace, E. Bisphenol A exposure, effects, and policy: a wildlife perspective. J. Environ. Manage.104, 19–34 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Aquatic life criteria for contaminants of emerging concern (2008).
- 11.Tran, H.T., et al., Phthalates in the environment: characteristics, fate and transport, and advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 344, 126249 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang, L., Gong, M., Xu, Y., and Zhang, Y. Phthalates in dust collected from various indoor environments in Beijing, China and resulting non-dietary human exposure. Build. Environ. 124, 315–322 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang, L., Wu, Z., Gong, M., Xu, Y., and Zhang, Y. Non-dietary exposure to phthalates for pre-school children in kindergarten in Beijing, China. Build. Environ. 167, 106438 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhardwaj, L.K. and A. Sharma, Estimation of physico-chemical, trace metals, Microbiological and phthalate in PET bottled water. Chem. Africa. 4(4), 981–991 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bhardwaj, L.K., Evaluation of Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) in the PET Bottled Mineral Water of Different Brands and Impact of Heat by GC–MS/MS. Chem. Africa. 5(4), 929–942 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang, R., et al., Occurrence, sources and transport of antibiotics in the surface water of coral reef regions in the South China sea: potential risk to coral growth. Environ. Pollut. 232, 450–457 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang, Z. M., Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J., Wang, Q. W., and Yang, G. P., Occurrence, distribution, and ecological risks of phthalate esters in the seawater and sediment of Changjiang river estuary and its adjacent area. Sci. Total Environ. 619, 93–102 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cao, Y., et al., Phthalate esters in seawater and sediment of the Northern South China sea: Occurrence, distribution, and ecological risks. Sci. Total Environ. 811, 151412 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oehlmann, J., M. Oetken, and U. Schulte-Oehlmann, A critical evaluation of the environmental risk assessment for plasticizers in the freshwater environment in Europe, with special emphasis on bisphenol A and endocrine disruption. Environ. Res. 108(2), 140–149 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Division USEPAWP. Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, 1. (Water Planning Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1982).
- 21.Net, S., Sempéré, R., Delmont, A., Paluselli, A., and Ouddane, B. Occurrence, fate, behavior and ecotoxicological state of phthalates in different environmental matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(7), 4019–4035 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang, Z. M., Zhang, H. H., Zou, Y. W., and Yang, G. P. Distribution and ecotoxicological state of phthalate esters in the sea-surface microlayer, seawater and sediment of the Bohai sea and the yellow sea. Environ. Pollut. 240, 235–247 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kingsley, O. and B. Witthayawirasak, Occurrence, ecological and health risk assessment of phthalate esters in surface water of U-Tapao Canal, southern, Thailand. Toxics. 8(3), 58 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qian, L.-L., et al., Determination of five sex hormones in urine samples for early evaluation of male reproductive toxicity induced by phthalate esters in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66(40), 10588–10597, (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang, W. H., Herianto, S., Lee, C. C., Hung, H., and Chen, H. L. The effects of phthalate ester exposure on human health: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 786, 147371 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Prasad, B., Phthalate pollution: environmental fate and cumulative human exposure index using the multivariate analysis approach. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts. 23(3), 389–399 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zolfaghari, M., Drogui, P., Seyhi, B., Brar, S. K., Buelna, G., and Dubé, R. Occurrence, fate and effects of Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 194, 281–293 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fatoki, O. S., Bornman, M., Ravandhalala, L., Chimuka, L., Genthe, B., and Adeniyi, A. J. W. S. Phthalate ester plasticizers in freshwater systems of Venda, South Africa and potential health effects. Water Sa. 36(1), 117–125 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang, L., Liu, J., Liu, H., Wan, G., and Zhang, S. The occurrence and ecological risk assessment of phthalate esters (PAEs) in urban aquatic environments of China. Ecotox. 24, 967–984 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Olujimi, O. O., Aroyeun, O. A., Akinhanmi, T. F., & Arowolo, T. A. Occurrence, removal and health risk assessment of phthalate esters in the process streams of two different wastewater treatment plants in Lagos and Ogun States, Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189, 1–16 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamazaki, E., et al., Bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues including BPS and BPF in surface water samples from Japan, China, Korea and India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. And Environmental safety. 122, 565–572 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peteffi, G. P., Fleck, J. D., Kael, I. M., Rosa, D. C., Antunes, M. V., and Linden, R. Ecotoxicological risk assessment due to the presence of bisphenol A and caffeine in surface waters in the Sinos river Basin-Rio Grande do Sul-Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 79, 712–712 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Corrales, J., et al., Global assessment of bisphenol A in the environment: review and analysis of its occurrence and bioaccumulation. Dose Response13 (3), 1559325815598308 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Fu, P. and K. Kawamura, Ubiquity of bisphenol A in the atmosphere. Environ. Pollut. 158(10), 3138–3143 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ying, G. G., Kookana, R. S., Kumar, A., and Mortimer, M. Occurrence and implications of estrogens and xenoestrogens in sewage effluents and receiving waters from South East Queensland. Sci. Total Environ. 407(18), 5147–5155 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tato, T., Salgueiro-González, N., León, V. M., González, S., and Beiras, R. Ecotoxicological evaluation of the risk posed by bisphenol A, triclosan, and 4-nonylphenol in coastal waters using early life stages of marine organisms (Isochrysis galbana, mytilus galloprovincialis, paracentrotus lividus, and acartia clausi). Environ. Pollut. 232, 173–182 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hajiouni, S., et al., Occurrence of microplastics and phthalate esters in urban runoff: a focus on the Persian Gulf coastline. Sci. Total Environ. 806, 150559 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Santhi, V. A., Sakai, N., Ahmad, E. D., and Mustafa, A. M. Occurrence of bisphenol A in surface water, drinking water and plasma from Malaysia with exposure assessment from consumption of drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 427, 332–338 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Szyrwinska, K., Kolodziejczak, A., Rykowska, I., Wasiak, W., and Lulek, J. Derivatization and gas chromatography-low-resolution mass spectrometry of bisphenol A. Acta Chromatogr. 18, 49 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Al-Saleh, I., Elkhatib, R., Al-Rajoudi, T., and Al-Qudaihi, G. Assessing the concentration of phthalate esters (PAEs) and bisphenol A (BPA) and the genotoxic potential of treated wastewater (final effluent) in Saudi Arabia. Sci. Total Environ. 578, 440–451 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Arfaeinia, H., Fazlzadeh, M., Taghizadeh, F., Saeedi, R., Spitz, J., and Dobaradaran, S. Phthalate acid esters (PAEs) accumulation in coastal sediments from regions with different land use configuration along the Persian Gulf. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 169, 496–506 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peijnenburg, W.J. and J. Struijs, Occurrence of phthalate esters in the environment of the Netherlands. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 63(2), 204–215 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang, X. T., Ma, L. L., Sun, Y. Z., and Xu, X. B. Phthalate esters in sediments from Guanting Reservoir and the Yongding River, Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.76, (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Lin, C., Lee, C. J., Mao, W. M., and Nadim, F. Identifying the potential sources of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination in the sediment of the Houjing river in Southern Taiwan. J. Hazard. Mater. 161(1), 270–275 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clara, M., et al., Occurrence of phthalates in surface runoff, untreated and treated wastewater and fate during wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 78(9), 1078–1084 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takdastan, A., Niari, M. H., Babaei, A., Dobaradaran, S., Jorfi, S., and Ahmadi, M. Occurrence and distribution of microplastic particles and the concentration of Di 2-ethyl hexyl phthalate (DEHP) in microplastics and wastewater in the wastewater treatment plant. J. Environ. Manage. 280, 111851 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Raju, S., et al., Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant. Water res. 173, 115549 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xu, Z., Sui, Q., Li, A., Sun, M., Zhang, L., Lyu, S., and Zhao, W. How to detect small microplastics (20–100 µm) in freshwater, municipal wastewaters and landfill leachates? A trial from sampling to identification. Sci. Total Environ. 733, 139218 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jagadeesh, N. and B. Sundaram, A review of microplastics in wastewater, their persistence, interaction, and fate. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9(6), 106846 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kittipongvises, S., Phetrak, A., Hongprasith, N., and Lohwacharin, J. Unravelling capability of municipal wastewater treatment plant in Thailand for microplastics: effects of seasonality on detection, fate and transport. J. Environ. Manage. 302, 113990 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ramirez, M.M.B., R.D. Caamal, and J.R. von Osten, Occurrence and seasonal distribution of microplastics and phthalates in sediments from the urban channel of the Ria and Coast of Campeche, Mexico. Sci. Total Environ. 672, 97–105 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang, Q., et al., Concentrations and distribution of phthalate esters in the seamount area of the tropical Western Pacific ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 140, 107–115 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Salaudeen, T., Okoh, O., Agunbiade, F., and Okoh, A. Fate and impact of phthalates in activated sludge treated municipal wastewater on the water bodies in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Chemosphere. 203, 336–344 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu, F. F., Liu, G. Z., Zhu, Z. L., Wang, S. C., and Zhao, F. F. Interactions between microplastics and phthalate esters as affected by microplastics characteristics and solution chemistry. Chemosphere. 214, 688–694 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Naji, A., M. Nuri, and A.D. Vethaak, Microplastics contamination in molluscs from the Northern part of the Persian Gulf. Environ. pollut. 235, 113–120 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Al-Salem, S., S. Uddin, and F. Al-Yamani, An assessment of microplastics threat to the marine environment: A short review in context of the Arabian/Persian Gulf. Mar. Environ. Res. 159, 104961 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dobaradaran, S., et al., Characterization of plastic debris and association of metals with microplastics in coastline sediment along the Persian Gulf. Waste manag. 78, 649–658 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rubin, B.S., Bisphenol A: an endocrine disruptor with widespread exposure and multiple effects. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 127(1–2), 27–34 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Guerra, P., Kim, M., Teslic, S., Alaee, M., and Smyth, S. A. Bisphenol-A removal in various wastewater treatment processes: operational conditions, mass balance, and optimization. J. Environ. Manage. 152, 192–200 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Petrie, B., R. Barden, and B. Kasprzyk-Hordern, A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water res. 72, 3–27 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sun, Q., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ashfaq, M., Dai, L., Xie, X., and Yu, C. P. Fate and mass balance of bisphenol analogues in wastewater treatment plants in Xiamen City, China. Environ. Pollut. 225, 542–549 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang, H., et al., Insights into removal mechanisms of bisphenol A and its analogues in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 692, 107–116 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sun, Q., Li, M., Ma, C., Chen, X., Xie, X., and Yu, C. P. Seasonal and Spatial variations of PPCP occurrence, removal and mass loading in three wastewater treatment plants located in different urbanization areas in Xiamen, China. Environ. Pollut., 208, 371–381 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huang, Y., et al., Bisphenol A (BPA) in china: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ. Int. 42, 91–99 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xue, J. and Kannan, K. Mass flows and removal of eight bisphenol analogs, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether and its derivatives in two wastewater treatment plants in new York State, USA. Sci. Total Environ. 648, 442–449 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Karthikraj, R. and Kannan, K. Mass loading and removal of benzotriazoles, benzothiazoles, benzophenones, and bisphenols in Indian sewage treatment plants. Chemosphere181, 216–223 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 67.Fabrello, J. and Matozzo, V. Bisphenol analogs in aquatic environments and their effects on marine species—a review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10(9), 1271 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 68.Petrie, B., Lopardo, L., Proctor, K., Youdan, J., Barden, R., and Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. Assessment of bisphenol-A in the urban water cycle. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 900–907 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liu, J., Zhang, L., Lu, G., Jiang, R., Yan, Z., and Li, Y. Occurrence, toxicity and ecological risk of bisphenol A analogues in aquatic environment–A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208, 111481 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kang, J.H., Asai, D., and Katayama, Y. Bisphenol A in the aquatic environment and its endocrine-disruptive effects on aquatic organisms (critical reviews in toxicology 37, 7). Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 38(2), 171 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.EU Updated European Risk Assessment Report 4, 4’-isopropylidenediphenol (Bisphenol-A). European Union (2008).
- 72.Oehlmann, J., Schulte-Oehlmann, U., Bachmann, J., Oetken, M., Lutz, I., Kloas, W., and Ternes, T. A. Bisphenol A induces superfeminization in the ramshorn snail (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) at environmentally relevant concentrations. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(Suppl 1), 127–133 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hernando, M. D., Mezcua, M., Fernández-Alba, A. R., and Barceló, D. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments. Talanta, 69(2), 334–342 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.ECOFRAM, Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods: Report of the Aquatic Workgroup. (US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, 1999).
- 75.Zheng, C., et al., Occurrence, distribution and ecological risk of bisphenol analogues in the surface water from a water diversion project in Nanjing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(18), 3296 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.


