Abstract
Controlling selective fragmentation at particular residues in the gas phase could greatly improve our ability to characterize intact proteins by mass spectrometry and reveal proteoforms crucial to human biology. However, the chemical homogeneity and size of proteins frustrates characterization because fragmentation inevitably leads to thousands of product ions and highly complex spectra that resist complete interpretation. Herein, we report a method for the selective, photochemical cleavage of whole proteins in the gas phase via the photolysis of alpha-peptidyl radicals. The activation process results in predictable and selective dissociation of the peptide bond N-terminal to the initiating radical. Alpha peptidyl radicals are readily introduced in a residue specific manner via the nitrosation of tryptophan, which enables an easily triggered side chain loss. This approach affords highly controlled fragmentation of intact proteins in the gas phase, producing results analogous to those obtained by tryptic digests in solution. The smaller fragment ions produced by selective dissociation are abundant and can be further analyzed to facilitate characterization by providing more detailed information about sequence and modification sites.
Protein characterization by mass spectrometry (MS) is the core enabling technology of modern proteomics. Due to their large size and complexity, this process benefits from the selective cleavage of proteins into tractable fragments for analysis. In the bottom-up approach, this cleavage is accomplished through enzymatic protease digestion in solution prior to MS.1 Despite the utility of this approach, proteoform-level information is inevitably degraded after digestion.2 The alternative top-down MS strategy retains proteoform integrity by keeping proteins intact while introduced into the gas phase.3 Unfortunately, there are no selective options when subsequent fragmentation is employed for additional proteoform characterization, significantly complicating data collection and analysis in top-down proteomics. Fred McLafferty elegantly explained the nature of this challenge with a well-known puzzle in which one light gold coin must be identified among many.4 The simplest solution is clearly not to weigh each coin individually, but rather to iteratively divide the collection of coins in half, weighing each to see which fraction contains the fraudulent coin. Unfortunately, selectively cutting proteins in half has proven to be a formidable challenge due to the chemical homogeneity and robust nature of peptide backbones. Energy sufficient to break one bond is likely to cleave many others. Hence, whether collisions,5–7 photons,8–10 or electrons11,12 are utilized, stochastic dissociation producing hundreds of fragments is observed.
A potential solution to this problem leverages the side chain identities, which are not chemically homogeneous, to introduce chemical functionality at specific residues. Human biology makes extensive use of this approach via posttranslational modification13 and more recently, chemists have made great strides in residue-specific modification strategies.14–16 Although much of this work has focused on other applications, side chain modifications could also be used to facilitate selective fragmentation in the gas phase (Figure 1a). Along these lines, the Julian lab has previously developed modifications allowing radicals to be created at specific residues,17 but subsequent collisional activation led to significant radical migration, which ultimately sabotaged fragmentation selectivity. We have recently discovered that alpha-peptidyl radicals absorb at 266 nm, resulting in selective dissociation of the peptide bond N-terminal to the alpha radical (Figure 1b). No other appreciable bond dissociation is observed during this process, and the fragment ions so produced are abundant and amenable to further nonselective dissociation in subsequent MS3 experiments (Figure 1c).
Figure 1.
a) Enabling selective dissociation requires chemical modification of the protein to introduce a weak point. After modification, collisions or photons create alpha radicals. b) Photoactivation of the alpha radical yields extremely selective dissociation of the N-terminal peptide bond, and only that bond. The initially formed b+1 ion is unstable and spontaneously decays into an a+1 ion. c) The a/y fragments can be analyzed further by MS3 experiments to localize PTMs or confirm sequence.
The selective dissociation illustrated in Figure 1 requires the introduction of an alpha radical at a specific location. We have initially accomplished this via N-nitrosation of tryptophan (Trp) in an acidified solution of sodium nitrite,18 followed by mild collisional activation in the gas phase.19 The nitrosation chemistry is selective against most other residues except for cysteine (Cys), which must be covalently blocked if present.20 The N–N bond between the Trp indole side chain and NO is thermally labile and cleaves homolytically to yield an indole radical that subsequently extrudes the entire Trp side chain (Scheme 1a).
Scheme 1.
Alpha Radical Generation and Theory
Due to their resonance stabilization, alpha-peptidyl radicals are thermodynamically preferred to most other protein radicals and do not readily migrate.21 The delocalized structure responsible for this stability (termed captodative or ambident)22 is the source of the UV photoactivity we observe. Scheme 1b (inset) shows the singly occupied molecular orbital of a model alpha-peptidyl radical on triglycine (DFT, ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ). Time-dependent DFT calculations on this species reveal a 244 nm absorption resulting in excitation to the D5 state (Scheme 1b) which has exothermic access to a dissociative state associated with N-terminal peptide bond cleavage as in Figure 1b. These states are not available for the closed-shell species.
To provide an example of the chemistry illustrated in Figure 1, we conducted experiments with cytochrome c (cytc), a ∼ 12 kDa heme protein comprised of 104 residues including a single Trp at position 59. Following nitrosation, electrospray ionization under mildly activating conditions produces favored loss of both NO and the Trp side chain (Scheme 1a), yielding an abundant alpha radical in the MS1 spectrum (Figure 2a). Isolation of the alpha radical in the 17+ charge state, followed by collisional activation yields the spectrum in Figure 2b. Interestingly, backbone fragmentation occurs with significant selectivity. The alpha radical preferentially migrates to beta position of Thr58 and then cleaves the backbone by radical-directed dissociation (RDD) through previously reported mechanisms18 to yield the z47, a57, c57, and a58 ions. Additional low intensity fragments are also produced by RDD (such as z42), along with numerous b/y ions generated competitively through the mobile-proton mechanism.23
Figure 2.
a) Efficient production of alpha radicals in MS.1 The charge states for protonated precursor ions are labeled. b) decharged24 CID spectrum for the 17+ alpha radical. c) decharged spectrum for dissociation of the 17+ ion following 266 nm PD for 8 ms. The protein is cleaved into two large fragments. d) decharged MS3 CID spectrum for the internal imine product. In the sequence representations, fragments are labeled using conventional line marks, which are bolded for ions with >50% intensity and light for <10% intensity. Precursor is annotated with a blue arrow.
In contrast, excitation of the same 17+ alpha radical ion for 8 ms with 266 nm light yields the spectrum shown in Figure 2c. Despite the hundreds of bonds present in cytc, only two significant fragments are produced, which both originate from cleavage of the peptide bond N-terminal to the alpha radical. Regardless of charge state, over 95% of dissociation occurs at the predicted site (Table S1), confirming that alpha radicals are not prone to migration. We term this method for inducing selective bond cleavage radical-initiated photodissociation (RIPD).
Although the majority of the precursor ions can be converted into the fragment ions shown in Figure 2c by increasing the photoactivation time, some residual intensity is observed at the same nominal mass as the original precursor even at much longer activation times. However, if this residual peak is subjected to collisional activation, the results reveal that subtle dissociation has occurred in the form of hydrogen atom loss from the original precursor. This loss is easily overlooked because the resulting one Dalton mass shift is difficult to confidently identify for intact proteins due to their wide isotopic distributions. However, the loss is easily rationalized by an alternate beta-scission pathway that is also photoactivated (see Scheme S1a). The H-loss produces an internal imine that is susceptible to attack and dissociation by the mechanism shown in Scheme S1b, producing highly unusual (and therefore confirmatory) z46-3 and c58 complement ion pairs (Figure 2d). In addition, competitive mobile proton derived dissociation is observed with significant overlap relative to the b/y ions observed in Figure 2b. Thus, dissociation with varying degrees of selectivity is observed for three different pathways following creation of an alpha radical.
To further illustrate the selectivity of RIPD, we examined proteins containing two and three Trp residues (Figure 3, the double radical species is photoactivated for both proteins). To facilitate interpretation of the results, the sequence regions delineated by Trp residues are highlighted by different colors. The RIPD fragments are then marked with color-coordinated sequence regions. Importantly, selective fragmentation at Trp residues is faithfully maintained for both proteins. Indeed, both the expected terminal and internal ions (i.e., those that result from cleaving the backbone twice) are observed. Furthermore, all the complement ion pairs are observed for every dissociation point, meaning that no ions were lost to unknown dissociation pathways, and all ions are assigned. This represents an important distinction between RIPD and stochastic dissociation pathways where complement ions are frequently lost and many of the observed peaks are unassignable.
Figure 3.
16 ms RIPD spectrum for the 15+ double alpha-radical precursor of a) ProtW2 (122 residues) and b) ProtW3 (126 residues). RIPD fragments are labeled by their N- and C-terminal residue numbers (both numbered from the N-terminal side). RIPD fragments are also color-coded into the relevant sequence regions delineated by Trp residues. Line marks specify the type of ion and cleavage site. # secondary ammonia loss, ← secondary RIPD of a+1 ion, downward arrow, precursor ion.
It is noticeable that some peaks in RIPD spectra are present as doublets. Importantly, these ions all correspond to secondary losses of small molecules from the terminal ends created by RIPD backbone dissociation. The mechanism of RIPD produces a radical a+1 ion and a terminal imine y-2 ion. The terminal imine group is susceptible to attack by lysine (Scheme S1c). Attack of terminal imines ultimately results in loss of ammonia. For peptides where lysine (or another suitable side chain) is in close proximity to the imine, loss of ammonia from the y-2 fragment is often observed and can be abundant. For the a+1 radical, certain C-terminal residues will favor an additional small molecule loss following backbone dissociation. For example, in cytc, the C-terminal residue is threonine, which favors loss of water following formation of the a-ion (Scheme S2a). Although these losses lead to additional dispersion of signal, they also provide information about sequence or fragment-ion type that can increase the confidence of assignments.
The selectivity afforded by RIPD also facilitates subsequent analysis in MS3 experiments because the RIPD fragment ions are produced in high abundance. MS3 dissociation of RIPD fragments has several advantages over direct dissociation of the precursor, which we demonstrate with experiments on chemically acetylated cytc. This procedure yields a highly complex mixture of one to four acetylations distributed throughout the sequence, presumably favoring modification at lysine residues. In other words, there are likely dozens (if not hundreds) of proteoforms present in the resulting mixture, a tremendous challenge for characterization by any method. Focusing on the singly acetylated peak, we started with the intact protein and used traditional methods such as electron-transfer dissociation (ETD, Figure 4a bottom) and higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD, Figure 4a top) to attempt to localize modifications (to simplify data interpretation we assume that Lys modification is dominant). For traditional top-down, two regions that likely contain an acetylated Lys residue are identified from the combination of both ETD and HCD data as indicated by the green boxes in Figure 4b. Although it is certain that additional acetylated Lys residues exist between these regions, it is not possible to localize additional sites because any mass shifted fragments observed at more interior sequence locations can also be attributed to the same Lys residues already indicated by the green boxes.
Figure 4.
a) Top-down ETD (upper) and HCD (lower) spectra for 17+ singly acetylated cytc. b) Combined sequence coverage and acetylated regions identified from intact cytc. c) RIPD spectrum for the +17 ion, followed by MS3 ETD (upper) and HCD (lower) on the singly acetylated a58+1-H2O (tan) and y46-2 (blue) ions. d) Combined sequence coverage and acetylation site identification, including two additional sites. Bold sequence ticks indicate acetylated fragments. Green boxes indicate localization of the acetylation site.
In contrast, in Figure 4c, RIPD is again used to selectively cleave the singly acetylated protein into two pieces. The results for ETD and HCD on each fragment are shown in the spectra below the corresponding RIPD fragment. The combined HCD/ETD sequence coverage and acetylation localization are shown in Figure 4d, with shading to distinguish RIPD fragments. Importantly, the initial selective dissociation creates new N/C termini, which allows the localization of two additional acetylation sites as indicated by the interior green boxes. N/C-terminal acetylation sites are also identifiable with this approach and are highly consistent with the sites identified by the traditional top-down approach. It is important to emphasize that the two additional interior acetylation sites cannot be identified utilizing the terminal ions generated by any traditional dissociation method, making them only accessible with RIPD. Furthermore, if we consider the cumulative sequence coverage between the two methods, they are comparable with a slight increase observed for the RIPD MS3 data (72% vs 78%). Importantly, because the RIPD fragments are significantly smaller than the original protein, the stochastic dissociation data in Figure 4c is less complex and easier to assign than the data in Figure 4a, which may account for the gain in sequence coverage.
In summary, we present a method for selectively fragmenting intact proteins in the gas phase. The dissociation is highly predictable, yields both complement ion pairs, and is amenable to subsequent MSn activation steps. Importantly, RIPD creates new termini, which facilitates deeper identification of PTMs and proteoforms. This tool provides great promise for expanding the reach of top-down proteomic.
Supplementary Material
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c07784.
Additional experimental details, materials, and methods, including dissociation mechanisms and RIPD yields. (PDF)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the NIH, SM NIGMS 4R00GM143529, RRJ NIA R01AG066626.
Footnotes
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/jacs.5c07784
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Lin He, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.
Aidan G. Purcell, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
Gregory J. O. Beran, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
Yixuan Zhu, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.
Karen R. Coronado, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
Samuel I. Mann, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
W. Hill Harman, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.
Ryan R. Julian, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
REFERENCES
- (1).Han X; Aslanian A; Yates JR Mass Spectrometry for Proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 2008, 12 (5), 483–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Smith LM; Agar JN; Chamot-Rooke J; Danis PO; Ge Y; Loo JA; Paša-Tolić L; Tsybin YO; Kelleher NL The Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics. The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the Human Proteome. Sci. Adv 2021, 7 (46), No. eabk0734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Po A; Eyers CE Top-Down Proteomics and the Challenges of True Proteoform Characterization. J. Proteome Res 2023, 22 (12), 3663–3675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Kelleher NL; Lin HY; Valaskovic GA; Aaserud DJ; Fridriksson EK; McLafferty FW Top Down versus Bottom Up Protein Characterization by Tandem High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1999, 121 (4), 806–812. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Mekecha TT; Amunugama R; McLuckey S a. Ion Trap Collision-Induced Dissociation of Human Hemoglobin Alpha-Chain Cations. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2006, 17 (7), 923–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Wei B; Zenaidee MA; Lantz C; Ogorzalek Loo RR; Loo JA Towards Understanding the Formation of Internal Fragments Generated by Collisionally Activated Dissociation for Top-down Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1194, 339400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Guo Y; Chowdhury T; Seshadri M; Cupp-Sutton KA; Wang Q; Yu D; Wu S Optimization of Higher-Energy Collisional Dissociation Fragmentation Energy for Intact Protein-Level Tandem Mass Tag Labeling. J. Proteome Res 2023, 22 (5), 1406–1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Shaw JB; Li W; Holden DD; Zhang Y; Griep-Raming J; Fellers RT; Early BP; Thomas PM; Kelleher NL; Brodbelt JS Complete Protein Characterization Using Top-Down Mass Spectrometry and Ultraviolet Photodissociation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135 (34), 12646–12651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Zhang L; Reilly JP Peptide Photodissociation with 157 Nm Light in a Commercial Tandem Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem 2009, 81 (18), 7829–7838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Kalcic CL; Gunaratne TC; Jones a D.; Dantus M; Reid GE Femtosecond Laser-Induced Ionization/Dissociation of Protonated Peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131 (3), 940–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Zubarev RA; Kelleher NL; McLafferty FW Electron Capture Dissociation of Multiply Charged Protein Cations. A Nonergodic Process. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120 (13), 3265–3266. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Lermyte F; Verschueren T; Brown JM; Williams JP; Valkenborg D; Sobott F Characterization of Top-down ETD in a Travelling-Wave Ion Guide. Methods 2015, 89, 22–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Zhong Q; Xiao X; Qiu Y; Xu Z; Chen C; Chong B; Zhao X; Hai S; Li S; An Z; Dai L Protein Posttranslational Modifications in Health and Diseases: Functions, Regulatory Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications. MedComm 2023, 4 (3), No. e261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Lin S; Yang X; Jia S; Weeks AM; Hornsby M; Lee PS; Nichiporuk RV; Iavarone AT; Wells JA; Toste FD; Chang CJ Redox-Based Reagents for Chemoselective Methionine Bioconjugation. Science 2017, 355 (6325), 597–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Xie X; Moon PJ; Crossley SWM; Bischoff AJ; He D; Li G; Dao N; Gonzalez-Valero A; Reeves AG; McKenna JM; Elledge SK; Wells JA; Toste FD; Chang CJ Oxidative Cyclization Reagents Reveal Tryptophan Cation-π Interactions. Nature 2024, 627 (8004), 680–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Messina MS; Stauber JM; Waddington MA; Rheingold AL; Maynard HD; Spokoyny AM Organometallic Gold(III) Reagents for Cysteine Arylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140 (23), 7065–7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Ly T; Julian RR Residue-Specific Radical-Directed Dissociation of Whole Proteins in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (1), 351–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Kirsch M; Korth H-G Generation, Basic Chemistry, and Detection of N-Nitrosotryptophan Derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem 2007, 5 (24), 3889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Knudsen ER; Julian RR Fragmentation Chemistry Observed in Hydrogen Deficient Radical Peptides Generated from N-Nitrosotryptophan Residues. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom 2010, 294 (2–3), 83–87. [Google Scholar]
- (20).Hao G; Gross SS Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of S- and N-Nitrosopeptides: Facile Loss of NO and Radical-Induced Fragmentation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2006, 17 (12), 1725–1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Sun Q; Nelson H; Ly T; Stoltz BM; Julian RR Side Chain Chemistry Mediates Backbone Fragmentation in Hydrogen Deficient Peptide Radicals. J. Proteome Res 2009, 8 (2), 958–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Rauk A; Yu D; Armstrong DA Toward Site Specificity of Oxidative Damage in Proteins: C-H and C-C Bond Dissociation Energies and Reduction Potentials of the Radicals of Alanine, Serine, and Threonine Residues - An Ab Initio Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997, 119 (1), 208–217. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Wysocki VH; Tsaprailis G; Smith LL; Breci LA Mobile and Localized Protons: A Framework for Understanding Peptide Dissociation. J. Mass Spectrom 2000, 35 (12), 1399–1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Clasen MA; Kurt LU; Santos MDM; Lima DB; Liu F; Gozzo FC; Barbosa VC; Carvalho PC Increasing Confidence in Proteomic Spectral Deconvolution through Mass Defect. Bioinformatics 2022, 38 (22), 5119–5120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





