Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2002 Jan;68(1):82–85. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.82-85.2002

Occurrence of Beauvericin and Enniatins in Wheat Affected by Fusarium avenaceum Head Blight

A Logrieco 1,*, A Rizzo 2, R Ferracane 3, A Ritieni 3
PMCID: PMC126553  PMID: 11772612

Abstract

We evaluated Fusarium contamination and the levels of hexadepsipeptide mycotoxins in 13 wheat samples affected by head blight in Finland. Fusarium avenaceum was the dominant species (91%) isolated from all samples, but isolates of F. culmorum (4%), F. tricinctum (3%), and F. poae (2%) also were recovered. Beauvericin (0.64 to 3.5 μg/g) was detected in all 13 samples. Enniatin B (trace to 4.8 μg/g) was detected in 12 samples, enniatin B1 (trace to 1.9 μg/g) was detected in 8 samples, and enniatin A1 (trace to 6.9 μg/g) was detected in 10 samples. Ten of 13 strains of F. avenaceum and 2 strains of F. poae and F. tricinctum produced beauvericin in culture on rice (trace to 70, 9.4, and 33 μg/g, respectively). All strains also produced enniatins (trace to 2,700 μg/g). This is the first report on the natural cooccurence of beauvericin and enniatins in wheat infected predominantly by F. avenaceum.


Head blight of small grain is an important cereal disease and may result in the accumulation of toxins in scabby grains. Among Fusarium species causing this disease, F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc., the anamorphic state of Gibberella avenacea R. Cook, is one of the most important species worldwide (1, 4). This species can produce significant quantities of toxic secondary metabolites in vitro, including moniliformin (14) and enniatins (5, 19). Fusarium avenaceum isolated from maize can produce beauvericin (12), and we think that beauvericin could be a major cereal contaminant as well. Beauvericin and enniatins are well-known cyclic hexadepsipeptides with a specific cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor activity (20). Beauvericin is toxic to several human cell lines (13) and can induce apoptosis and DNA fragmentation (13, 17). Furthermore, beauvericin exerted a negative inotropic effect (decrease in cardiac contraction strength) as well as a negative chronotropic effect (decrease in frequency of cardiac spontaneous beating activity) in isolated guinea pig hearts (9), suggesting a potential risk of cardiotoxicity when beavericin is present as a contaminant in grains and foods. Only moniliformin has been reported as a natural contaminant of wheat affected by F. avenaceum head blight (6, 7, 18).

The extent of human, animal, and plant exposure to these cyclodepsipeptides has not been well established. Our objective in this study was to investigate the natural occurrence of beauvericin and enniatins in wheat affected by F. avenaceum head blight. In Finland during 1998, climatic conditions favored the development of Fusarium head blight. We identified the Fusarium species involved in the epidemic, determined the levels of beauvericin and enniatins present, and assessed the ability of the isolated Fusarium strains to produce beauvericin and enniatins.

(An abstract of this work was presented at the Sixth European Fusarium Seminar, Berlin, Germany, 11 to 16 September, 2000.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wheat samples.

Thirteen samples (300 g each) of wheat kernels were randomly collected at harvest time during August and September from head blight-affected wheat fields in four areas (Artjärvi, Vantaa, Orimattila, and Renko) of southern Finland during the 1998 crop season. The samples were transported in sterile plastic bags to the laboratory and stored at 4°C for 3 days.

Mycological analysis.

One hundred infected kernels from each of the 13 samples were placed on the surface of petri plates (five kernels per plate) of Fusarium-selective agar medium containing pentachloronitrobenzene (16). Plates were incubated in the dark at 25°C for 1 week. Fusarium colonies were transferred to plates of potato dextrose agar (800 ml of filtrate from 200 g of peeled, sliced, and autoclaved potatoes; 20 g of dextrose; and 15 g of Bacto agar [Difco, Detroit, Mich.], brought to 1,000 ml with distilled water) and were incubated at 25°C for 10 days under fluorescent- and black-light lamps (2,700 lx; 12-h photoperiod). The identification of 773 colonies of Fusarium species was made according to the criteria and synoptic keys of Nelson et al. (16). Single conidia on carnation leaf agar (16) were used for fermentation studies. To preserve the cultures, mycelia and conidia from wild strains grown on carnation leaf agar were transferred aseptically in 1 ml of sterile 18% glycerol-water and frozen at −75°C. The isolates were deposited in the collection of the Istituto Tossine e Micotossine da Parassiti Vegetali.

In vitro mycotoxin production.

Sixteen representative single-conidium isolates of F. avenaceum (13), F. poae (Peck) Wollenw. (1), F. tricinctum (Corda) Sacc. (1), and F. culmorum (W. G. Smith) Sacc. (1) were cultured on 10 g of autoclaved rice, adjusted to about 45% moisture in a 50-ml plastic tube, and inoculated with 0.5 ml of an aqueous suspension containing approximately 107 conidia/ml. Cultures were incubated at 25°C for 3 weeks in the dark. This procedure was repeated two more times to account for possible variability in toxin production by fungi. Culture material was dried in a forced-draft oven at 60°C for 48 h, finely ground, and stored at 4°C until use. Controls were treated the same way except that they were not inoculated.

Mycotoxin analysis.

Water for the high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phase was purified in a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). Organic solvents (HPLC grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The standards for beauvericin (catalog no. B7510) and an enniatin mixture (catalog no. E3643) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). The enniatin mixture contained enniatin B (19%), enniatin B1 (54%), enniatin A (3%), and enniatin A1 (20%), as described by Monti et al. (15). To extract beauvericin and enniatin, 10 g of each sample was ground and homogenized in a Ultraturrax model T25 basic from IKA Werke (Staufen, Germany) for 3 min at 13,500 rpm with 50 ml of methanol (HPLC grade). Samples were filtered through Whatman no. 4 filter paper, and all methanol was removed under reduced pressure. Extracts were resuspended in 3 ml of methanol, prepurified once on a C18 column (500 mg, 3 ml, 40 μm) (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.), concentrated to 1 ml, and filtered through an Acrodisk filter (pore size, 0.22 μm) (Millipore, Jonezawa, Japan) before HPLC analysis. Beauvericin and enniatin (B, B1, and A1) analyses were performed as described by Monti et al. (15) with minor modifications. HPLC analyses were performed using LC-10AD pumps and a diode array detector from Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan). A Shiseido Capcell Pak C18 column (250 by 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used. HPLC conditions included a constant flow at 1.5 ml/min and acetonitrile-water (65:35, vol/vol) as the starting eluent system. The starting ratio was kept constant for 5 min and then linearly modified to 70% acetonitrile in 10 min. After 1 min at 70% acetonitrile, the mobile phase was returned to the starting conditions in 4 min. Beauvericin and enniatins were detected at 205 nm. Mycotoxins were identified by comparing retention times and UV spectra of samples with those of authentic standards. Further confirmation was obtained by coinjecting pure standards with each sample. Mycotoxins were quantified by comparing peak areas from samples to a calibration curve of standards. Chemical structures were confirmed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A Perkin-Elmer series 200 liquid chromatograph connected to a 785A UV-visible detector was coupled with an API-100 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Sciex Instruments, Ontario, Canada). The detection limits were 20, 1.3, 3.6, and 1.2 ng/g for beauvericin, enniatin A1, enniatin B1, and enniatin B, respectively. All analyses were run in triplicate, and the mean values are reported. The calculated standard deviation was always less than 5%.

RESULTS

All 13 wheat samples in this study were infested with Fusarium species at from 5 to 100% of kernels. In some cases the kernels were infected with more than one species. The predominant species was F. avenaceum (91%), which was isolated from all samples. The other Fusarium species encountered, which made up 4% of the recovered species, included F. tricinctum, F. poae, and F. culmorum (Table 1). Although we used a medium selective for Fusarium, other fungi, belonging mostly to the Epicoccum, Alternaria, and Microdochium genera, also were recovered. Beauvericin was detected in all 13 samples. Enniatin B, enniatin B1 and enniatin A1 were detected in 12, 8, and 10 samples, respectively. Beauvericin concentrations ranged from 0.64 to 3.5 μg/g. Enniatin B concentrations ranged from trace to 4.8 μg/g, enniatin B1 concentrations ranged from trace to 1.9 μg/g, and enniatin A1 concentrations ranged from trace to 6.9 μg/g. Eight samples contained all four toxins. The total cyclodepsipeptide concentration ranged from 1.7 to 17 μg/g.

TABLE 1.

Occurrence of beauvericin and enniatins in wheat head blight caused by Fusarium species in Finland

Samplea Fusarium spp. (no. of kernels infected)b Concn (μg/g)c
Beauvericin Enniatin B Enniatin B1 Enniatin A1 Total cyclodepsipeptides
Kem 192 F. avenaceum (10) 2.3 1.6 0.66 2.6 7.1
Kem 195 F. avenaceum (5) 2.9 TRd 1.8 2.8 7.5
Kem 194 F. avenaceum (7) 0.64 NDe ND ND 0.64
Kem 201 F. avenaceum (100) 2.6 3.3 ND TR 5.9
Kem 202 F. avenaceum (100), F. culmorum (3) 3.1 3.9 1.6 4.9 13
Kem 203 F. avenaceum (100) 2.5 TR ND ND 2.5
Kem 204 F. avenaceum (94) 3.5 4.5 1.9 6.9 17
Kem 205 F. avenaceum (100) 1.3 3.1 TR 5.5 9.9
Kem 206 F. avenaceum (100), F. tricinctum (22) 0.91 2.9 ND TR 3.8
Kem 207 F. avenaceum (38) 3.1 TR ND ND 3.1
Kem 219/1 F. avenaceum (13), F. poae (12) 1.5 4.8 1.4 TR 7.7
Kem 219/3 F. avenaceum (9) 1.7 TR TR TR 1.7
Kem 219/4 F. avenaceum (32), F. culmorum (28) 1.1 4.7 TR 5.3 11
a

Kem, Finnish cereal sample from National Veterinary and Food Research Institute. The Kem samples were collected in southern Finland from the following four districts: Artjärvi (Kem 192), Vantaa (Kem 195), Orimattila (Kem 194), and Renko (Kem 201 to Kem 219/4).

b

Based on 100 kernels per sample; kernels can be infected by multiple species.

c

Detection limits for beauvericin, enniatin A1, enniatin B1, and enniatin B were 20, 1.3, 3.6, and 1.2 ng/g, respectively.

d

TR, trace.

e

ND, not detected.

Of the 16 strains tested for mycotoxin production, 13 were F. avenaceum, 1 was F. tricinctum, 1 was F. poae, and 1 was F. culmorum (Table 2). When the strains were cultured on rice, beauvericin was produced by 10 of 13 strains of F. avenaceum (trace to 70 μg/g.). All 13 strains of F. avenaceum also produced enniatin B (3.4 to 2,700 μg/g), enniatin B1 (trace to 1,200 μg/g), and enniatin A1 (trace to 94 μg/g). The F. poae and F. tricinctum strains also produced beauvericin (9.4 and 33 μg/g, respectively), enniatin B (3.4 and 690 μg/g), enniatin B1 (trace and 1,200 μg/g), and enniatin A1 (trace and 94 μg/g).

TABLE 2.

Production of beauvericin and enniatins on rice by strains of Fusarium species isolated from wheat head blight in Finlanda

Fusarium sp. ITEMb strain no. Source Concn (μg/g)c
Beauvericin Enniatin B Enniatin B1 Enniatin A1 Total cyclodepsipeptides
F. avenaceum 3397 Kem 201 6.4 9.0 12 TRd 27.4
F. avenaceum 3410 Kem 201 57 1,900 150 6.9 2,114
F. avenaceum 3411 Kem 201 3.6 2,600 1,000 7.8 3,611
F. culmorum 4154 Kem 202 NDe ND ND ND
F. avenaceum 3401 Kem 203 TR 2.6 3.0 TR 5.6
F. avenaceum 3398 Kem 204 1.9 170 74 2.2 248.1
F. avenaceum 3409 Kem 204 70 2,000 220 41 2,331
F. avenaceum 3402 Kem 205 TR 24 13 TR 37
F. avenaceum 3403 Kem 205 3.2 580 26 14 623
F. avenaceum 3404 Kem 205 5.3 450 33 18 506
F. tricinctum 3405 Kem 206 33 690 1,200 94 2,017
F. avenaceum 3408 Kem 206 60 1,200 270 1.8 1,532
F. poae 3399 Kem 219/1 9.4 3.4 TR TR 12.8
F. avenaceum 3400 Kem 219/1 ND 56 74 TR 130
F. avenaceum 3406 Kem 219/4 ND 860 130 TR 990
F. avenaceum 3407 Kem 219/4 ND 260 180 15 455
a

Strains were grown on rice for 3 weeks at 25°C in the dark.

b

ITEM, Istituto Tossine e Micotossine Culture Collection.

c

Detection limits for beauvericin, enniatin A1, enniatin B1, and enniatin B were 20, 1.3, 3.6, and 1.2 ng/g, respectively. Data are averages from three cultures of each strain.

c

TR, trace.

d

ND, not detected.

DISCUSSION

This report is the first of the natural occurrence of beauvericin and enniatins B, B1, and A1 in wheat grain infected by Fusarium. Previous reports indicated that beauvericin is primarily a natural contaminant of maize infected by F. subglutinans (Wollenw. et Reinking) Nelson, Toussoun et Marasas (10) and F. proliferatum (Matsushima) Nirenberg (11). Wheat contamination with these toxins is probably underestimated, since F. avenaceum is a widespread wheat head blight agent and can produce high levels of these toxins. To date, the main concern regarding mycotoxins associated with F. avenaceum in wheat has been moniliformin (6, 7), which can have at least an additive effect with beauvericin and enniatins eventually cooccurring. On the other hand, wheat head blight caused by F. graminearum Schwabe [Gibberella zeae (Schw.) Petch] and F. culmorum should result in little, if any, beauvericin and enniatin contamination, because neither species is known to produce these toxins (12). Field survey reports clearly indicate that the mycotoxins most frequently produced in cereal head blight by F. graminearum and F. culmorum in all European countries are deoxinivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, and zearalenone (1). However, since Fusarium head blight often is caused by a complex of toxigenic species which occur at different levels depending on environmental conditions and geographic locations, toxin analyses should be addressed with respect to the species most frequently isolated.

Our results on the occurrence of Fusarium in wheat kernels in Finland confirm those of several previous surveys in northern Europe (1, 6, 7), including Finland (21), which found that F. avenaceum is one of the dominant species on wheat. Although F. avenaceum is considered by some to be a saprophyte or a weak parasite (2), under favorable conditions, it may be an aggressive wheat pathogen, causing scab (3, 6, 8).

In the present study, most of the strains of F. avenaceum collected from Finnish wheat produced beauvericin and enniatins. These results confirm earlier reports of beauvericin- and enniatin-producing strains of F. avenaceum (12, 19). The level of beauvericin production varied by strain, indicating that this phenotype is polymorphic in field populations of F. avenaceum. Recently, Yli-Mattila et al. (22) showed that F. avenaceum from Finland is polymorphic for randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers and that the examined population could be divided into five main groups by using this character. Further analyses of toxigenic and genetic variation within and between populations of F. avenaceum, also from different hosts (e.g., potatoes, legumes, and conifers), and pathogenicity tests in particular, will be necessary to resolve their genetic relationship and relative importance in producing symptoms of the disease with relative mycotoxin accumulation.

In this study the type B enniatins were much more common than the type A enniatins in F. avenaceum. However, this relationship is reversed for other F. avenaceum strains, where the type A enniatins predominate (19).

We found that F. poae, F. tricinctum, and F. culmorum can be recovered from wheat kernels in addition to F. avenaceum. Of these species, only F. poae and F. tricinctum synthesize hexadepsipeptides that might accumulate in the colonized wheat kernels. The production of beauvericin by F. poae is consistent with a previous study in which we found that three strains from Poland could produce this toxin (12). This is the first report of the production of beauvericin by F. tricinctum.

In conclusion, our results indicate that beauvericin and enniatins can occur at significant levels in wheat affected by F. avenaceum head blight in Finland and that further study of their spread in cereals and their toxicity is needed. It also will be important to determine if there are synergistic effects with other toxins, e.g., moniliformin and trichothecenes, to better evaluate the toxicological risk to humans and animals.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Commission Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources Programme (QLK1-CT-1999-001380), Key Action 1 on Food, Nutrition and Health, and by EU COST action 835 “Agriculturally Important Toxigenic Fungi.”

We thank V. Ricci for technical assistance.

Footnotes

This work is dedicated to the memory of G. Randazzo.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bottalico, A. 1998. Fusarium diseases of cereals: species complex and related mycotoxin profiles, in Europe. J. Plant Pathol. 80:85–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burgess, L. W., R. Dodman, W. Pont, and P. Mayers. 1981. Fusarium diseases of wheat, maize and grain sorghum in eastern Australia, p.64–76. In P. E. Nelson, T. A. Toussoun, and R. J. Cook (ed.), Fusarium: diseases, biology, and taxonomy. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
  • 3.Clear, R. M., and S. K. Patrick. 1990. Fusarium species isolated from wheat samples containing tombstone (scab) kernels from Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:1057–1069. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cook, R. J. 1981. Fusarium diseases of wheat and other small grains in North America, p.39–52. In P. E. Nelson, T. A. Toussoun, and R. J. Cook (ed.), Fusarium: diseases, biology, and taxonomy. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
  • 5.Cook, A. H., S. F. Cox, T. H. Farmer, and M. S. Lacey. 1974. Production of antibiotics by Fusaria. Nature 160:31–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Golinski, P., M. Kostecki, P. Kaptur, S. Wojciechowski, Z. Kaczmarek, H. Wisniewska, and J. Chelkowski. 1997. Fusarium head blight and moniliformin accumulation in kernels of 18 winter wheat cultivars inoculated with Fusarium avenaceum (3 years study). Cereal Res. Commun. 25:673–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Golinski, P., J. Perkowski, M. Kostecki, J. Grabarkiewicz-Szezesna, and J. Chelkowski. 1997. Fusarium species and Fusarium toxins in wheat in Poland—a comparison with neighbor countries, p.12–22. In A. Logrieco, K. A. Seifert, J. F. Leslie, O. Petrini, and L. E. Petrini (ed.), Biodiversity of toxigenic Fusarium species. Sydowia, special issue. Berger, Horn/Austria.
  • 8.Koizumi, S., H. Kato, R. Yoshino, N. Hayashi, and M. Ichinoe. 1991. Distribution of causal Fusaria of wheat and barley scab in Japan. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 57:165–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lemmens-Gruber, R., B. Rachoy, E. Steininger, K. Kouri, P. Saleh, R. Krska, R. Josephs, and M. Lemmens. 2000. The effect of the Fusarium metabolite beauvericin on electromechanical and physiological properties in isolated smooth and heart muscle preparations of guinea pigs. Mycopathologia 149:5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Logrieco, A., A. Moretti, A. Ritieni, J. Chelkowski, C. Altomare, A. Bottalico, and G. Randazzo. 1993. Natural occurrence of beauvericin in preharvest Fusarium subglutinans infected corn ears in Poland. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41:2149–2152. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Logrieco, A., A. Moretti, A. Ritieni, A. Bottalico, and P. Corda. 1995. Occurrence and toxigenicity of Fusarium proliferatum from preharvest maize ear rot, and associated mycotoxins, in Italy. Plant Dis. 79:727–731. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Logrieco, A., A. Moretti, G. Castella, M. Kostecki, P. Golinski, A. Ritieni, and J. Chelkowski. 1998. Beauvericin production by Fusarium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3084–3088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Logrieco, A., A. Moretti, A. Ritieni, M. F. Caraffa, and L. Macchia. 2001. Beauvericin: chemistry, biology and significance. In R. K. Upadhyay (ed.), Advances in microbial toxin research and its biotechnological exploitation, in press. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • 14.Marasas, W. F. O., P. E. Nelson, and T. A. Toussoun. 1984. Toxigenic Fusarium species: identity and mycotoxicology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
  • 15.Monti, S. M., Fogliano, V., Logrieco, A., Ferracane, R., and A. Ritieni. 2000. Simultaneous determination of beauvericin, enniatins and fusaproliferin by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:3317–3320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nelson, P. E., T. A. Toussoun, and W. F. O. Marasas. 1983. Fusarium species—an illustrated manual for identification. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
  • 17.Ojcious, M., A. Zychlinsky, L. M. Zheng, and J. D.-E. Young. 1991. Ionophore-induced apoptosis: role of DNA fragmentation and calcium fluxes. Exp. Cell Res. 197:43–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sharman, M., J. Gilbert, and J. Chelkowski. 1991. A survey of the occurrence of the mycotoxin moniliformin in cereal samples from sources worldwide. Food Addit. Contam. 8:459–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Strongman, D. B., G. M. Strunz, P. Giguere, C.-M. Yu, and L. Calhoun. 1988. Enniatins from Fusarium avenaceum isolated from balsam fir foliage and their toxicity to spruce budworm larvae. Choristoneurea fumiferana (Clem.). J. Chem. Ecol. 14:753–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tomoda, H., X. H. Huang, H. Nishida, R. Nagao, S. Okuda, H. Tanaka, S. Omura, H. Arai, and K. Inoue. 1992. Inhibition of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase activity by cyclodepsipeptide antibiotics. J. Antibiot. 45:1626–1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Uoti, J., and A. Ylimaki. 1974. The occurrence of Fusarium species in cereal grain in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 13:5–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yli-Mattila, T., S. Paavanen, A. Hannukkala, P. Parikka, R. Tahvonen, and R. Karjalainen. 1996. Isozyme and RAPD-PCR analyses of Fusarium avenaceum strains from Finland. Plant Pathol. 45:126–134. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES