Skip to main content
Alzheimer's & Dementia logoLink to Alzheimer's & Dementia
. 2025 Nov 27;21(11):e70884. doi: 10.1002/alz.70884

Brain and retina in Alzheimer's disease: Pathological intersections and estimates from imaging

M Amin Banihashemi 1,2, Saffire H Krance 2,3, Patrick Xiang Ji 2, Morgan Koo 2,4, Julie Ottoy 1,2, Richard H Swartz 1,2,5, Peter J Kertes 1,2,6, Christopher Hudson 1,6,7, Maged Goubran 2,8, Sandra E Black 1,2,5,
PMCID: PMC12658388  PMID: 41307192

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging as a promising biomarker for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This review connects AD brain pathology – particularly amyloid beta (Aβ), tau, and vascular changes – with corresponding retinal changes. Evidence suggests that abnormal Aβ and tau deposits in the retina may reflect brain pathology, though their formation mechanisms remain unclear. Retinal vascular changes may also mirror brain pathology, with recent data emerging on other co‐pathologies. Retinal thickness changes, especially in acetylcholine‐producing layers, can differentiate AD from controls, although not in early AD; however, emerging high‐resolution OCT techniques may enhance early detection. We find that correlations between retinal thickness and brain structures are often weak, and retinal vascular imaging shows promise in estimating cerebrovascular disease markers from retinal vascular changes. Novel imaging modalities (e.g., hyperspectral imaging) for detecting retinal Aβ deposits may improve early AD screening when combined with other biomarkers.

Highlights

  • Retinal Aβ/tau is equivocal; peripheral retinal p‐tau shows diagnostic promise.

  • OCT retinal/choroid thickness diagnostic/prognostic AUC is small to medium.

  • Hyperspectral imaging and electroretinography may aid early diagnosis.

  • OCTA may differentiate MCI from controls, but preclinical studies are needed.

  • The added value of retinal biomarkers for risk stratification remains uncertain.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, amyloid, blood vessels, optical coherence tomography, tau

1. INTRODUCTION

Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging is actively used for the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), 1 , 2 and their manifestations, including brain atrophy 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 and cognitive decline. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Early detection of brain pathology is important, as interventions may be more effective in the early stages of dementia. 12 Current biomarkers for early detection 13 , 14 , 15 are often time‐consuming, invasive, or costly, such as brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 15 , 16 , 17 Therefore, new biomarkers are required for population‐level screening, such as retinal imaging biomarkers, which are cheaper, 18 quicker, and more accessible.

This review aims to (1) describe the current understanding of AD pathology and its relation to the retina; (2) identify brain and retinal biomarkers that differentiate individuals across normal aging, preclinical AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia, focusing on early detection; and (3) assess the correlation of brain and retinal biomarkers, particularly imaging biomarkers, and compare their diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. We aligned our work with the proposed scale for quality assessment of narrative reviews (SANRA) 19 and included a search strategy in the supplementary material. While several reviews have addressed aspects of this topic, 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 we aim to comprehensively discuss post mortem evidence, highlight underexplored areas, and evaluate the effect size of studies for clinical relevance. Most evidence is based on post mortem examinations and in vivo imaging in humans, with non‐human studies reviewed when human data are lacking.

2. Evolution, development, and anatomy

Humans have the largest primate brains, with approximately 80% of neurons in the neocortex. 28 The primary visual cortex has neuron densities three to five times greater than other regions. 29 Brain areas that evolved and developed earlier, such as the brainstem and spinal cord, are less vulnerable to AD pathology, whereas later‐evolving regions, including neocortical structures and those undergoing greater expansion during recent evolution, such as the temporal lobe, are more susceptible. 30 , 31 The visual cortex has shown less evolutionary expansion and fewer neurons containing DNA exceeding a diploid set compared to the temporal lobe and entorhinal cortex, potentially protecting it from AD pathology. 31 Furthermore, the greater the degree of myelination of neural tracks, the less vulnerable they are to oxidative stress and AD pathology. 32 One such region with early signs of AD pathology is the basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS), which modulates cognition through extensive cortical innervation. 33 Although the BFCS is evolutionarily conserved, associated cortical areas have expanded roughly three‐fold since early hominids without a matching increase in cholinergic neurons, leaving BFCS‐cortical projections especially vulnerable to degeneration. 34 We discuss the role of this vulnerability in AD progression further in Section 4.1.

Brain structures originate from the embryonic forebrain, or prosencephalon, which gives rise to the telencephalon (including the basal forebrain) and the diencephalon (from which the retina develops). 35 , 36 , 37 Notably, cholinergic BFCS neurons arise from the ganglionic eminence of the telencephalon. 38 Furthermore, we see shared regulatory genes responsible for embryonic forebrain development and eye development. 39 , 40 , 41 These close developmental and genetic connections between the brain and eye highlight the potential of retinal imaging biomarkers to identify risk factors for brain disorders with a genetic predisposition, including AD. 42

3. Alzheimer's disease pathology and co‐pathologies

The pathogenesis of AD is primarily linked to two misfolded proteins: amyloid beta (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau (p‐tau). 43 , 44 The abnormal accumulation of these toxic proteins leads to synaptic loss and neurodegeneration. 45 Pathological tau seeding and spreading from the limbic to association cortices correlate more closely with cognitive impairment than Aβ. 46 , 47 , 48 However, it is the synergistic interaction of both proteins 49 and a third contributor, cerebral vessel disease, 50 , 51 that drives cognitive decline. 49 , 52 The typical pattern of these three pathologies is illustrated in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Alzheimer's disease brain pathology. (A) Tau deposits form neurofibrillary tangles, initially appearing in the entorhinal region and locus coeruleus, then spreading to subcortical nuclei and neocortex (stages I to VI). 79 , 80 Phase 2 is depicted with a darker blue gradient, indicating tau pathology spreading from the frontal and temporal neocortex. Purple shading emphasizes tau's characteristic spread to the entorhinal cortex during this phase, highlighting occasional amyloid plaque deposition in the amygdala, insular cortex, and cingulate cortex. (B) Amyloid beta (Aβ) deposits progress in nearly opposite direction (phases 1 to 5), as shown by autopsy and positron emission tomography imaging, 194 , 195 though studies linking them to retinal biomarkers are limited. (C) White matter hyperintensities start near the anterior and posterior horns of the lateral ventricles, 360 matching areas of lower perfusion. 361 Figure created in Biorender.

Nonetheless, overlapping pathologies and disease subtypes in mixed dementia cohorts do not align neatly with the classic description of AD, making mixed disease the most common presentation, whether in MCI or AD. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 We adhere to a biological definition of AD that emphasizes Aβ, tau, and neurodegeneration, 13 while also acknowledging the contributions of vascular factors. 58 Other comorbidities, such as neuroinflammation, 23 , 59 Lewy bodies, 60 transactive response DNA binding protein 43 kDa (TDP‐43), 55 and neuronal hyperactivity in the cortex and hippocampus, 61 are discussed only briefly due to limited evidence from retinal studies on these pathologies.

4. Post mortem EVIDENCE

4.1. Brain

4.1.1. Tau

Intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau (p‐tau), forming neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), occurs in subcortical structures about a decade before extracellular Aβ plaques appear in the cortex. 62 P‐tau spreads through cell‐to‐cell transmission along neuronal pathways, particularly glutamate projection pathways in the neocortex. 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 Abnormal tau deposits appear to begin in the entorhinal cortex 64 , 67 and other medial temporal lobe areas, 68 , 69 gradually spreading to limbic structures along corticocortical pathways, ultimately affecting the entire neocortex (Figure 1). 62 , 66 , 70 NFTs also appear in the spinal cord, even in Braak stage I, 71 , 72 though Aβ plaques are less common. 73 , 74

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT
  1. Systematic review: The authors utilized an open‐ended search strategy to synthesize interdisciplinary knowledge on AD pathology and the potential of retinal imaging in estimating this pathology. Sources included evidence‐based resources, structured Medline searches using keywords from prior systematic reviews, citation tracking, and identification of key authors in the field.

  2. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that while the utility of retinal thickness measured by OCT may be limited, choroidal thickness, retinal vessel imaging, and hyperspectral imaging show the most promising potential.

  3. Future directions: The manuscript proposes increased focus on the aforementioned most promising retinal biomarkers. Examples of promising, yet less‐studied, retinal biomarkers include automatic subcellular segmentation of high‐resolution OCT images, as well as OCT optophysiology and elastography.

4.1.2. Impact of tau on neurotransmitters

The spread of tau affects two modulation centers early in AD: one based on norepinephrine (noradrenergic) and another on acetylcholine (cholinergic). The cholinergic nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM), part of the BFCS, is particularly vulnerable to tau 75 , 76 and modulates cognitive functions, including attention, memory, and arousal, through its connections to the neocortex and amygdala. 77 , 78 We will pay closer attention to the nbM later in this review.

4.1.3. Aβ

Aβ is primarily produced by nerve cells that already contain p‐tau. 79 Aβ plaques originate in the cerebral neocortex, spreading to the entorhinal cortex and eventually to subcortical structures, 80 possibly through cell‐to‐cell transfer. 81

4.1.4. Cerebrovascular disease

Cerebrovascular disease, manifesting as small and large vessel disease, was found in 15% to 33% of a large autopsy series (n > 500) and 50% to 80% of cases with AD pathology. 54 , 82 This vascular pathology may account for 32% of the contribution of the aging process to dementia risk, while other factors, such as Lewy bodies and TDP‐43, may explain about 68%. 83 AD‐associated cerebrovascular disease is characterized by increased Aβ deposits in cerebral arteries, resulting in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and disruption of the blood–brain barrier. 84 This accumulation can then impair cerebrovascular reactivity and decrease perfusion, thereby accelerating the progression of AD. 85 , 86 In Braak stages III and IV, occipital angiopathy was more prevalent in those with cognitive impairment than in controls, while white matter arteriosclerosis showed no difference (n = 185). 52

4.1.4.1. Visual and circadian pathways

The visual cortex is relatively spared until the late stages of AD. Localized accumulations of AD pathology occur in the occipital neocortex during Braak stage 4, while significant involvement typically begins in stage 5 (Figure 1). 79 , 87 , 88 The prevalence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the occipital lobe is notable, with rates of 60% to 80% in dementia cases 79 , 89 , 90 , 91 compared to 2% to 40% in non‐dementia cases aged over 65 years. 89 , 92 , 93

Alzheimer's pathology eventually impacts subcortical structures within the visual and circadian pathways. The visual pathway comprises two components: the visual perception pathway and the ocular reflex pathway.

In the visual perception pathway, the lateral inferior pulvinar nucleus, lateral geniculate nucleus, superior and inferior colliculi, and primary visual cortex have been shown to exhibit both amyloid plaques and p‐tau NFTs. 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 The effect of Aβ plaques on the magnocellular 98 or parvocellular layers 95 of the lateral geniculate nucleus, a thalamic relay nucleus, 99 remains inconclusive, although Aβ pathology appears more prominent than p‐tau in these structures.

In the ocular reflex pathway, the Edinger–Westphal nucleus, which receives retinal input, shows increasing neuronal loss with the progression of AD. 100 This pathology is linked to exaggerated pupil dilation following cholinergic blocking agents, which may serve as a potential disease biomarker. 100 In addition, the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus, part of the circadian pathway, shows accumulations of AD pathology (Figure 2). 101 , 102

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Brain anatomy. (A) Mid‐sagittal view of visual pathway shows that the visual cortex is relatively spared in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Optic radiations traverse the temporal and parietal lobes. Projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) relay visual information: Those from the superior visual field course rostrally into temporal white matter (Meyer's loop), then caudally to the visual cortex, while those for the macula and inferior field pass laterally around the ventricle and caudally through the parietal white matter. The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus, receiving inputs from melanopsin‐containing retinal ganglion cells, regulates sleep–wake cycles. One standard deviation variation in macular or pRNFL thickness correlates with approximately a 0.05 standard deviation variation in a brain volume, such as whole brain, frontal, parietal, temporal or occipital lobes, or hippocampus, when accounting for head size and age, 3 , 4 which appears too small for clinical usefulness. (B) Among over 18 classes of retinal ganglion cells, two major types are shown: M (magnocellular) cells, which detect motion and gross spatial features, and P (parvocellular) cells, which help identify color and form. 37 Both LGN layers may be affected by amyloid plaques in AD. (C) A coronal cut at the nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM) illustrates the basal forebrain cholinergic system, which supplies the hippocampus, olfactory bulb, amygdala, and neocortex, 362 while the pontomesencephalotegmental complex of the brain stem innervates the dorsal thalamus and parts of the forebrain. 363 The nbM has two projection pathways (medial and lateral) and is adjacent to the visual pathway, making it vulnerable to AD pathology and oxidative stress. The medial cholinergic pathway goes through the cingulum bundle and supplies several cortices, including the cingulate gyrus in blue. The lateral cholinergic pathway includes the capsular division in red (going through the external capsule and uncinate fasciculus) and the perisylvian division in brown (going through the claustrum and extreme capsule). 33 (D) An axial midbrain cut shows the Edinger‐Westphal nucleus, which projects through CN‐III to the ciliary ganglion for pupillary constriction, and exhibits early AD pathology with exaggerated responses to acetylcholine antagonists. 100 Figure created in Biorender.

4.2. Retina

4.2.1. Retinal thinning

Retinal thinning in AD was identified over a century after the first reports of brain atrophy in dementia. 103 , 104 Post mortem examinations show that the retina is thinner in patients with AD compared to controls, particularly in layers with acetylcholine‐producing cells, such as the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and inner nuclear layer (INL) (Figure 3); however, data for MCI remain limited (Table 1). While retinal thinning may serve as a biomarker for neurodegeneration, it is unclear if retinal Aβ or tau deposits can differentiate AD from normal aging 105 (Table 1; for animal studies, see Guo et al. 106 ).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The retina and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) image of a 39‐year‐old male normal control is shown alongside patterns typical of AD pathology, including amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau deposits, and neurodegeneration with thinning in the inner retinal layers. 107 , 118 Note that tau can affect all layers. 25 Retinal tauopathy appears distinct, progressing through staged involvement. 25 The retinal nerve fiber layer comprises ganglion cell axons that form the optic nerve, reflecting the diencephalic origin of the retina. Starburst amacrine cells, primarily at the inner plexiform and inner nuclear layer border, with displaced ones in the ganglion cell layer, 141 are key for acetylcholine neurotransmission and modulate direction‐selective ganglion cells. 139 Their fate in AD, like that of brain cholinergic cells, remains understudied. Additionally, the choroid, a vascular tissue, shows reliably measured thinning in mild cognitive impairment compared to controls. 1 , 24 Figure created in Biorender.

TABLE 1.

Retinal post mortem examination in select studies.

Thickness

Alzheimer's disease versus controls

Amyloid beta

Alzheimer's disease versus controls

Tau

Alzheimer's disease versus controls

Retinal layer Difference No difference Difference No difference Difference No difference
pRNFL ↓2,4,6 4,7,8 7,8
Total macula 9,10,13,14 14,1
GCL ↓2,4,5,6 13 3,4,7,8,12 12 7,8
IPL ↓6 3,4,7,8,12 3,12,1 a 7,8
INL ↓6 3,4,7,8,12 12,1 a 7,8
OPL 4,7,8,12 3,1 a 7,8
ONL ↓6 4,7,8,12 7,8,12
RPE 4,7,8,12 7,8,12
Choroid ↓11

Note: ↓Denotes less thickness in Alzheimer's disease versus controls.

Abbreviations: GCL, ganglion cell layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; pRNFL, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium.

a

Layer‐by‐layer analysis is not provided in Hart de Ruyter et al. 97 when differentiating cohorts, but most total tau and phosphorylated tau were observed in these layers. The retina is significantly thinner in Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy controls in post mortem studies, while differences in Aβ and tau between the two cohorts is less settled.

References: (1) Hart de Ruyter et al., 97 ; (2) Hinton et al., 103 ; (3) den Haan et al., 107 ; (4) Blanks et al., 108 ; (5) Blanks et al., 109 ; (6) Asanad et al., 110 ; (7) Ho et al., 111 ; (8) Williams et al., 112 ; (9) Lee et al., 113 ; (10) Koronyo‐Hamaoui et al., 114 ; (11) Tsai et al., 115 ; (12) Schon et al., 116 ; (13) La Morgia et al., 117 ; (14) Koronyo et al. 118

4.2.2. Aβ and tau in the retina

Data on retinal p‐tau and Aβ are limited. These proteins may help to identify AD, with increased retinal Aβ linked to greater cognitive impairment. 97 , 107 , 113 , 114 , 118 Since p‐tau primarily differs between AD and normal controls in the far periphery of the retina, 97 , 107 detecting these proteins or their effects through retinal thinning may be beyond the field of view for most imaging methods. In a recent study from the Netherlands Brain Bank, the mean surface percentage of p‐tau positivity with Ser202/Thr205 (b = 23, SE = 8, p < 0.01) and Th217 (b = 10, SE = 5, p = 0.04) in the retinal far periphery could differentiate AD and Braak stages I to III NFT from normal controls with Braak stage 0. 97 Both retinal p‐tau stains correlated with the Ser202/Thr205 stain in the hippocampus and temporal pole (b = 3 to 6, SE = 2, p < 0.01 to 0.02), with retinal p‐tau Ser202/Thr205 correlating further with its own variant in the medial frontal gyrus and parietal lobes. However, only 35% of AD (6/17) cases showed p‐tau in the retina. 97

A recent post mortem study on MCI (normal n = 19, MCI n = 11, AD n = 24) found a difference in thickness between MCI and normal controls (15 to 20 µm) but not appreciably between MCI and AD (AD < MCI by ∼5 µm). 118 This difference in thickness is larger than that reported in OCT studies (typically < 5 µm), 1 likely due to the limited field of view in OCT imaging. Additionally, melanopsin retinal ganglion cells, which project to the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus to modulate circadian rhythm, show AD pathology. 117

4.2.3. De novo formation or cell‐to‐cell transfer

It remains unclear whether abnormal retinal Aβ and tau accumulation results from cell‐to‐cell transfer from brain cells, as seen in brain tau propagation 63 , 119 , 120 or from de novo formation. Evidence supporting cell‐to‐cell transfer includes a non‐human primate model where injecting abnormal tau into the entorhinal cortex led to propagation to the visual system in the occipital lobe 121 ; however, evidence of spread to the retina is lacking. In a non‐primate study, abnormal Aβ injected into one eye of a mouse propagated to the nervous system and the contralateral eye, resulting in retinal ganglion cell loss in both retinas. 122

Conversely, in support of de novo formation, post mortem human studies indicate that a form of tau distinct from brain deposits accumulates in stages, starting from the outer plexiform layer (OPL) and progressing to inner layers such as the inner nuclear layer (INL) and IPL. These retinal deposit stages correlate with Braak amyloid phases but not tau stages or other brain pathology scores 25 ; they appear smaller and rounder than the cored, diffuse, or fibrillary plaques in the brain 107 , 111 and do not show structures resembling fibrillar inclusions, threads, or NFTs. 97 Surprisingly, in some mouse models, abnormal Aβ 114 and tau 123 deposits appear earlier in the retina than in the brain, supporting de novo formation.

4.2.4. Correlation with Aβ and tau in the brain

Results on the correlation between brain and retinal pathology are mixed. Evidence shows abnormal Aβ 118 and tau accumulation in both the brain and retina 107 ; however, their morphology and biology may differ. In the brain, intracellular Aβ accumulation leads to cell death, release into the extracellular space, and plaque formation 124 ; however, this may not occur in the retina. 113 Retinal tau accumulation also leads to loss of retinal ganglion cells, and tauopathy‐laden ganglion cells increase in higher brain tau stages in MCI and AD (n = 41). 125 One study, not accounting for age, found a strong unadjusted correlation (r ≈ 0.50 to 0.70, n = 21 to 32) between retinal thickness and abnormal Aβ deposits, tau staging, and Aβ phases in the brain (figure 1j,m, figure 5h, and figure S8h–j in Koronyo et al. 118 ). For context, the hippocampal volume has a similar unadjusted correlation (r = −0.75, n = 16) with Braak NFT stages, 126 which weakens (r = −0.23, n = 64) when considering age, sex, and time since death. 127 While these findings are promising, post mortem studies on the retina are limited, with smaller sample sizes for each NFT stage (n = 12) compared to brain autopsy series. 107

4.2.5. Vessels, α‐synuclein/Lewy bodies, TDP‐43, and neuroinflammation

Vessels

Aβ deposits along retinal vessels disrupt tight junctions, mirroring findings in the brain, with markers of this disruption correlating with cerebral amyloid angiopathy in MCI and AD (unadjusted r = 0.67 to 0.75, p < 0.001, n = 38). 128 Interestingly, fibro‐hyalinoid thickenings, resembling cerebrovascular disease changes, concentrate around optic disc vessels adjacent to peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) fibers that project through the visual pathway. 129 Although most post mortem retinal vascular studies are not AD‐specific, evidence from hypertensive humans (n = 8) and primates shows vascular leakage linked to pericyte dysfunction, 130 paralleling brain findings (see review by Kim and Cheon 131 ). Calculated odds of observing cerebral artery sclerosis in the presence of retinal arterial sclerosis from older and larger pathology reports is somewhat weak (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9 [0.96 to 3.78], p = 0.064, n = 286). 132 , 133 Less examined are retinal veins, which appear to show signs of collateralization in the form of the vasa vasorum in aging. 134 However, no studies were found in the context of AD or correlating these findings with cerebral veins.

α‐synuclein/Lewy bodies

α‐synuclein is rarely found in the retina in AD (1/19 [5%] of cases with brain Braak and Lewy body stage IV in the inferior retina) and is more likely present when the brain shows signs of α‐synucleinopathy, particularly in the brainstem, limbic, and neocortical areas. 135 While α‐synuclein is primarily studied in Lewy body dementia and Parkinson's disease, AD can also exhibit this pathology. 51 , 136 In aging retinas, α‐synuclein and β‐synuclein are mainly in the IPL, while γ‐synuclein is typically in the nerve fiber layer. In AD, γ‐synuclein decreases in the nerve fiber layer but increases in the outer nuclear layer (ONL). 137 Retinal α‐synuclein differs from that in the brain and does not correlate with brain Lewy bodies. 111

TDP‐43

A small post mortem study (AD = 3, controls = 6), mostly focused on frontotemporal dementia, found no TDP‐43 deposits in either AD or control retinas. 138

Neuroinflammation

Research on retinal neuroinflammation is limited. One post mortem study reported a two‐ to three‐fold increase in neuroinflammatory markers in MCI and AD retinas compared to normal aging, with strong but unadjusted correlations with retinal Aβ and tau deposits (r = 0.73 to 0.83, p < 0.01, n = 14 to 15). 118

Vascular changes, proteinopathies, and neuroinflammation may interact to have significant implications for AD pathology in the retina; however, our understanding of their role is currently limited.

4.2.6. Cholinergic cells

Acetylcholine modulates cognition in the brain and perception in the retina. 139 , 140 , 141 Cholinergic cells in the retina have been identified through immunohistochemical staining for acetylcholine and choline acetyltransferase. 140 , 142 However, little is known about the fate of these retinal cholinergic‐producing cells (called starburst amacrine cells) within the aging–MCI–AD continuum (see Table S1 for a comparison of acetylcholine‐producing cells in the brain and retina). Retinal amacrine cells vary in type, with some producing dopamine that stimulates acetylcholine release from starburst amacrine cells. The interaction between dopamine and acetylcholine is reviewed by Witkovsky, 143 while Faiq et al. 144 discuss the role of acetylcholine in vision and its potential as a therapeutic target in retinal degeneration.

Although no post mortem examinations of the retina in preclinical AD have been reported, a recent study detected p‐tau, specifically p‐tau Ser202/Thr205 and Thr217, in amacrine and horizontal cells in the INL and the processes of amacrine cells in IPL in tauopathies, including AD samples. 97 The impact of neurotransmitter loss in the brain on retinal tissues is still unclear. A study in rats showed that nerve growth factor applied to the conjunctiva enhanced cholinergic activity in the retina and forebrain, 145 , 146 potentially indicating a connection between the two acetylcholine‐producing tissues.

4.3. Limitations of animal models

While AD is primarily a human‐specific disease 147 largely confined to the central nervous system, 30 , 72 , 148 models of presumed causative agents, such as Aβ 149 and tau, 121 have been developed in non‐human primates. 150 While these models show some related dysfunctions, such as gait abnormalities, 151 they have not yet reproduced a comprehensive pathological, cognitive, and memory profile similar to human AD. 34 , 147 Identifying suitable animal models for studying the brain–retina association is challenging. For example, despite some non‐human primate models, such as the rhesus macaque and marmoset, developing signs of AD pathology in their aging brains, their retinas show minimal signs of aging. 152 , 153 Non‐primate mouse models have their own limitations, as discussed elsewhere. 154 , 155 , 156

We now transition from ex vivo histopathological light microscopy, with a resolution of 0.2 µm, to in vivo imaging with significantly lower resolutions for retinal imaging (5 µm), brain MRI (0.5 to 3 mm), and brain positron emission tomography (PET) (2 to 8 mm).

5. MRI, PET, OCT imaging, and fluid biomarkers

5.1. Brain

5.1.1. MRI: whole brain

Brain atrophy

Brain atrophy occurs in healthy aging and AD, but the overlap varies by region. Meta‐analytic “overlap percentages” 157 reveal that aging and AD overlap 45% in whole‐brain volume, 34% in the temporal lobe, 25% in the hippocampus, 30% to 38% in the entorhinal cortex, and 51% in the basal forebrain. A 25% hippocampal overlap means only 75% of AD patients lie outside normal ranges. 157 , 158 Despite this overlap, specific patterns – cortical thinning in the medial and inferior temporal lobes, temporal poles, and regions of the frontal and parietal lobes – identify individuals at risk of cognitive decline. 159 , 160 Early AD shows atrophy in primitive allocortex regions, notably the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. 161 , 162

A recent meta‐analysis reported hippocampal volume differentiates controls from AD (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88 to 0.93]), but less accurately distinguishes controls from MCI (AUC = 0.73 [0.69 to 0.77]). 163 In contrast, predicting MCI‐to‐AD decline is less accurate, with lesser sensitivity and specificity for the hippocampal volume (0.71 to 0.73 [0.64 to 0.80]) and for the medial temporal lobe (0.64 to 0.65 [0.51 to 0.76]) based on a meta‐analysis. 164 Machine‐learning segmentation of hippocampus volume may improve diagnostic accuracy. 165 , 166

For the cholinergic system, posterior nbM volume yields the best diagnostic accuracy for differentiating normal controls from AD (AUC = 0.88 [0.84 to 0.92]), 167 similar to the hippocampus. However, almost no studies on predictiing decline from MCI to AD based on BFCS volume could be found. The closest reported value is from one study predicting cognitive decline from BFCS volume (AUC = 0.78 [0.50 to 0.98]) in individuals with AD on cholinesterase inhibitor therapy. 168 Interestingly, in preclinical AD (n = 147), the BFCS septal nuclei were found to be enlarged by 20 mm3 compared to controls (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28), 169 demonstrating that the earliest changes may not always involve atrophy.

In the later stages of AD, atrophy is evident in the whole brain and in the temporal, parietal, and frontal neocortices. 161 Furthermore, spinal cord neuroimaging in AD is not well studied but may play a minor role in identifying the disease state. 170 The number of studies on spinal cord imaging may increase with recent automated segmentation tools. 171 , 172

We will review the association of the aforementioned brain structures with retinal measures in Section 5.3.

Cerebral small vessel disease

Cerebral small vessel disease manifests as white matter hyperintensities on imaging 50 , 173 , 174 and has an independent yet additive effect on Aβ deposition in AD pathogenesis. 51 , 175 Collagenosis of the large deep penetrating venular system in aging and dementia leads to vasogenic edema, capillary denudation, and oligodendroglia injury, contributing to cognitive impairment. 176 , 177 The degree of white matter hyperintensities within cholinergic pathways also correlates with impairment, particularly in executive function, attention, and memory. 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 Furthermore, remodeling of the carotid terminus secondary to hypertension affects the BFCS volume, correlating with greater cognitive impairment. 182

White matter hyperintensities most frequently occur in the frontal and occipital lobes, 183 which are associated with lower cortical thickness in the left superior parieto‐occipital cortex and lingual gyrus. 51 , 184 The gray matter volume of the lingual gyrus, part of the visual pathway, is associated with the pRNFL and GCL thickness, 5 , 185 with retinal thickness reflecting visual system changes. Given that the retinal blood supply comes from the anterior circulation, where hypertension has the most detrimental effects, the morphology of small vessels in the retina may provide insight into overall brain health in addition to retinal atrophy alone. As later described in Section 5.2.3, OCT imaging of retinal vessels helps distinguish healthy controls from MCI. In addition to vascular density loss, a compromised blood–brain barrier may lead to vascular edema and microhemorrhages, seen as amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities on brain MRI, during anti‐amyloid antibody therapy, occurring at rates of 1% to 40% depending on treatment regimen and apolipoprotein E ε4 carrier status. 186 , 187 , 188

5.1.2. MRI: visual and circadian pathways

Atrophy

While occipital lobe atrophy is not a recognized biomarker for identifying individuals at risk of cognitive decline or conversion to AD, its atrophy pattern can differentiate AD dementia with Lewy bodies from AD alone, with greater atrophy observed in AD. 189 Given the connection between the retina and visual cortex, estimating occipital lobe atrophy using OCT may be feasible and provide insights into cognitive status in areas such as visuospatial skills and memory 190 ; however, its clinical utility for diagnosing or predicting the prognosis of AD remains uncertain.

Cerebrovascular disease

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is more prevalent in the occipital lobe, which is relatively spared in the early stages of AD. An age‐matched study found reduced white matter volume in the presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy compared to controls or AD patients without cerebral amyloid angiopathy, particularly in posterior brain regions. 191 In contrast, visual pathway white matter tracts are damaged in MCI and more so in AD, explaining visual defects such as impaired contrast sensitivity. 192 Subcortical structures, including the pulvinar nucleus, lateral geniculate nucleus, superior colliculus, and suprachiasmatic nucleus, also show atrophy in AD. 101 These changes occur earlier in the dorsal visual pathway than in the ventral pathway. 193 Further studies on the visual pathway, including retinal imaging, are discussed in Section 5.3.

5.1.3. Positron emission tomography

Neurofibrillary tau tangles identified in post mortem examinations can be detected in vivo using PET imaging. Imaging studies suggest that cognitive impairment may begin with isolated memory issues in Braak stages III and IV, with further progression beyond Braak stage III seemingly dependent on the presence of Aβ. 194 Phases of Aβ cortical spread observed post mortem are similarly seen in vivo, 195 correlating with transitions from preclinical AD to MCI to AD. 196 PET findings indicate that these abnormal Aβ accumulations may begin 20 to 30 years before dementia onset. 197 Combining fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) PET (FDG PET) with other imaging modalities and cognitive tests can enhance the sensitivity and specificity to >90% for predicting MCI to AD conversion. 198 However, amyloid PET imaging is not widely available and is costly, with uncertain utility in MCI or cognitively unimpaired individuals. 199 , 200 Additionally, PET imaging positivity may vary by ethnicity. 201 Despite these limitations, PET imaging influences management in approximately 60% of patients with MCI or dementia of uncertain origin, indicating its potential value. 202 Its use is expected to rise with emerging disease‐modifying therapies. 203

5.1.4. Fluid biomarkers: cerebrospinal fluid and plasma

Nearly half of recent clinical trials on AD disease‐modifying therapy used a fluid biomarker (44%, 121/272 trials), with ∼25% using these biomarkers as target endpoints, mostly in phase 2 trials. 204 These biomarkers include Aβ, tau, neurofilament light (neurodegeneration), and GFAP (astrogliosis/inflammation). A greater emphasis is placed on plasma biomarkers as they are less invasive compared to cerebrospinal biomarkers.

Cerebrospinal

A recent meta‐analysis supports the ability to identify individuals who will convert from MCI to AD based on cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1‐42, showing large effect sizes (SMD = 1.73 [1.39 to 2.07] for MCI converting to AD vs normal controls; SMD = 1.19 [0.96 to 1.42] for MCI converting to AD vs stable MCI) from 1092 participants across 22 studies. 205

Plasma

Plasma p‐tau has emerged as a highly promising biomarker for AD detection. In particular, p‐tau217 demonstrates strong correlations with elevated PET Aβ (AUC = 0.92 to 0.96) and PET tau (AUC = 0.93 to 0.97). 206 , 207 Additionally, p‐tau181 effectively differentiates preclinical AD and MCI from controls (AUC = 0.82 to 0.90, n = 1298) 208 and moderately predicts cognitive decline (AUC = 0.62 [0.53 to 0.71], n = 428). 209 In contrast to tau, amyloid‐based plasma biomarkers, such as Aβ42/Aβ40, have a lower AUC (approximately 0.75) for distinguishing normal controls from AD, 210 with similarly lower AUCs for identifying individuals with Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (AUC = 0.86) 211 or brain PET Aβ (AUC = 0.75). 210 However, they appear to be better suited than p‐tau181 for screening in anti‐amyloid therapy trials. 209 Plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels show genetic links to Aβ and tau production. 212 They can predict cognitive decline, with a hazard ratio of 1.32 for progression from unimpaired or MCI to AD. 213 However, NfL's ability to distinguish preclinical AD (AUC = 0.67) and MCI (AUC = 0.77) from controls is limited. 208 While plasma biomarkers for Aβ and tau are not routinely used in clinical practice, 214 , 215 , 216 ongoing advancements may improve their reliability 211 , 217 , 218 and cost‐effectiveness for trial screening. 210 Other plasma biomarker combinations may have similar diagnostic and prognostic value (n = 3366). 219

Correlations with brain structural imaging further support the validity of plasma biomarkers. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios correlate positively with hippocampal volume, whereas p‐tau levels inversely correlate with gray matter volume and cortical thickness. 220 Additionally, plasma NfL levels correlate negatively with white matter microstructural integrity as assessed by diffusion tensor imaging. 220

Overall, the AUCs for most biomarkers range from 0.70 to 0.90. Combining multiple fluid biomarkers has a minimal impact on accuracy. 208

5.2. Retina

The retina undergoes thinning with aging, as shown by OCT imaging. 221 , 222 , 223 The inner retinal layers get thinner while the outer layers thicken, necessitating separate assessments of each layer; the fovea also becomes thicker. 222 , 223 Despite these changes, both retinal layers and the pRNFL are typically thinner in MCI and AD compared to age‐matched healthy controls (Table 2). The in vivo thinning pattern in AD aligns with the accumulation of pathological proteins, primarily affecting the inner retinal layers that express acetylcholine, such as the GCL, IPL, and INL (Tables 2 and S1). 107 , 110 , 142 , 224 The following section provides an overview of select retinal imaging and electrophysiological biomarkers.

TABLE 2.

Retinal optical coherence tomography examination in select meta‐analysis studies.

Retinal layer Alzheimer's disease versus controls Mild cognitive impairment versus controls Preclinical disease versus controls
pRNFL thickness ↓1 to 5 ↓3 to 5, 7, 8 (trending) 1, 6 =2
Inferior pRNFL ↓↓1 to 5 ↓3, 4, 5, 8 / =2
Superior pRNFL ↓↓↓1 to 5 ↓2 to 5, 8 (trending)
Nasal pRNFL ↓1 to 4 / =5 ↓3, 4, 8 / =2, 5
Temporal pRNFL ↓1 to 4 / =5 ↓3 to 5, 8
Macular volume ↓2 (trending)1 ↓(trending)1, 2, 6
Macular GC‐IPL thickness ↓1, 2 ↓(trending)1 / = 2, 6 =2
Macular GCC thickness ↓1, 2 ↓2, 6
Foveal thickness ↓2 = 2, 7
Outer layer thickness ↓2
Subfoveal choroidal thickness ↓1, 2 ↓2

Note: ↓ denotes Alzheimer's disease (AD) < controls trending or statistically significant, = denotes almost equal.

Abbreviations: GCC, ganglion cell complex; GCL‐IPL, ganglion cell‐inner plexiform layer; pRNFL, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer.

There is greater retinal thinning in AD compared to healthy controls, which is less so in mild cognitive impairment or at the preclinical disease stage.

References: (1) Chan et al., 1 (2) Ge et al., 24 (3) Coppola et al., 225 (4) Thomson et al., 226 (5) Wang et al., 227 (6) Mejia‐Vergara et al., 228 (7) Noah et al., 229 (8) Knoll et al. 230

5.2.1. OCT resolution of 5 to 10 µm

Cross‐sectional studies

For retinal thickness to be adequate in screening, it must distinguish preclinical AD or MCI from normal controls. A recent meta‐analysis indicated that OCT parameters showed poor to moderate diagnostic accuracy with a low risk of bias, particularly in differentiating normal controls from MCI (GCL‐IPL: AUC = 0.55 to 0.72, mRNFL: 0.58 to 0.62, pRNFL: 0.57 to 0.64), with similar distinctions between controls and AD (AUC = 0.57 to 0.70) 2 (Table 2).

Preclinical AD and MCI

Differences in pRNFL and inner macula measures (GCL and IPL) are negligible and below device resolution between normal controls and preclinical AD (SMD ≈ 0.05 [−0.5 to 0.5], n = 172 to 466), approximated from Figure 2 of Ge et al. 24 ) or between cognitively normal twins with varying brain PET Aβ status (≤3 µm, n = 165). 231 However, differentiation between MCI and normal controls shows slightly improved results (SMD ≈ 0.5 [−0.95 to 0.01]). 24 Most studies involving MCI participants report significant pRNFL thinning, particularly in the amnestic MCI subtype 229 ; however, these differences of 2 to 7 µm 1 , 227 often fall below the resolution of OCT devices, which is typically 5 to 7 µm. Choroidal thickness may be a more promising measure, with differences between MCI and normal controls appearing to be at least 10 µm for several sectors, exceeding the resolution of OCT devices (SMD of 0.5 µm for MCI compared to normal controls). 24 However, no reports have compared choroidal thickness between preclinical AD and normal controls.

Alzheimer's disease

Studies consistently show pronounced thinning across all layers investigated, with the most significant thinning in the superior and inferior pRNFL quadrants. Meta‐analyses report that the total pRNFL is approximately 6 to 12 µm thinner in AD compared to controls, with the superior pRNFL being 8 to 24 µm thinner and the inferior pRNFL 7 to 21 µm thinner 1 , 24 , 225 , 226 , 227 ; these values exceed the device's resolution. In contrast, the difference in inner retinal layers is only 3.7 µm [0.8 to 6.5], which is well below the resolution threshold. 1 It is essential to note that even when mean differences exceed the device's resolution, the lower bound of the 95% CI may still be close to or below the resolution (<5 µm), effectively rendering these differences non‐significant. Choroidal thickness demonstrates the most significant differences, with a reduction of 65 µm [43 to 86], well above the device's resolution when comparing normal controls to AD. 1

Longitudinal studies

Studies on retinal layer changes are limited. One study indicated that the rate of pRNFL or macular thickness change in just under 2 years between twins with (n = 16) or without (n = 129) cortical Aβ may not differ appreciably. 232 However, in preclinical individuals at greater risk due to higher baseline brain amyloid levels, the IPL appears thicker, 233 and the rate of IPL thinning is slower over 2 years. 11 , 232 Other studies present a mixed picture, with variable thicknesses in adjacent regions of each retinal layer when comparing MCI and AD. 234 , 235

Combining biomarkers for enhanced AD screening

Plasma and genome‐wide studies have shown AUCs of approximately 0.80 for distinguishing AD from controls (n = 1439) 236 and 0.90 for identifying future conversion to AD from subjective memory decline or MCI when combined with other biomarkers (n = 883). 237 While retinal imaging has a current diagnostic AUC 0.10 to 0.20 points lower than plasma biomarkers, it offers a low‐cost and rapid screening option. By combining the most promising retinal imaging techniques with other well‐performing biomarkers, diagnostic yields could potentially match those of established non‐invasive screening programs for other conditions, such as fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer (pooled AUC = 0.87 [0.85 to 0.88]) 238 and mammography for breast cancer (pooled AUC = 0.89). 239

5.2.2. OCT resolution < 5 µm: adaptive optics and computational approaches

Current OCT devices have a resolution limited to 5 to 7 µm. A new OCT platform with a resolution of 3 µm and faster acquisition times allows for clearer imaging of cell contours and nuclei, including those of the GCL, ONL, and photoreceptor cells. 240 Another approach combines adaptive optics with OCT. While the axial resolution of OCT is independent of pupil diameter, adaptive optics enhances resolution by compensating for lighting aberrations, achieving resolutions of 2 µm over a 300 × 300 µm field. 241 , 242 Most studies using higher resolution have focused on photoreceptors, particularly cone cells, 242 with no research on MCI and AD at resolutions < 5 µm.

Greater sensitivity can also be achieved by increasing the number of scans and reducing the scan time. 243 Similarly, higher acquisition rates in swept‐source OCT, combined with full‐field OCT, enable aberration correction through computational post‐processing, thereby improving visualization. 241 A new wide‐field platform aims to provide an 8‐µm axial resolution and 3.1‐µm transverse resolution over a 3 × 3 mm area, 244 which may enhance clinical utility.

Given that histological studies with resolutions < 1 µm and in vivo imaging at 5 µm have yielded mixed diagnostic results, the benefits of higher‐resolution in vivo retinal imaging for AD diagnosis remain uncertain. A higher resolution may allow a quantitative count of GCL cells, which may be a more effective diagnostic indicator than retinal thickness alone. Further reviews on this topic are provided by Ge et al., Hampson et al., and in chapters 9 and 10 of Drexler et al. 245 , 246 , 247

5.2.3. OCT angiography (OCTA), vascular reactivity, blood flow, and fundoscopy

OCTA: vessel density and fovea avascular zone

OCTA uses increased signal variance from moving erythrocytes to distinguish blood vessels from surrounding static tissue, 243 quantifying the vessel density and the size of the fovea avascular zone, a foveal area devoid of blood vessels at the center of vision.

Cross‐sectional assessment: Recent systematic reviews present mixed findings on vessel density. Two studies on sporadic cerebral small vessel disease reported lower capillary density via OCTA (n = 137), 248 while another found a negligible correlation between OCTA vessel density and white matter hyperintensity lesions on MRI (n = 30). 249 Retinal vessel density, adjusted for age and sex, correlates strongly with cerebrovascular reactivity (partial r = 0.67) and weakly with cognitive functions linked to the frontal and occipital lobes, including executive and visuospatial functions (β = 0.02). 250

The percentage area covered by vessels in the superficial and deep plexuses is 1% to 3% [0.02% to 6%] lower in MCI compared to controls, depending on the equipment used. 251 , 252 The fovea avascular zone is reported to be slightly larger in MCI compared to controls 0.07 [< 0.01 to 0.13] mm2, but no differences were observed between AD and controls, suggesting potential compensation for vessel loss in later stages or that differences in MCI were small to begin with given the small lower bound CI of differences (<0.01 mm2). 251 The values mentioned are smaller than normative databases of healthy controls. 253 , 254 The lower bound 95% CIs of cohort differences for the fovea avascular zone exceed OCTA resolution, suggesting OCTA may be a reliable biomarker. However, differences in vessel density < 3% may be negligible given the resolution of devices and moderate to good repeatability (intraclass correlation: 0.65 to 0.85, n = 86). 255 Newer segmentation methods may improve accuracy, 256 but observed vessel density changes remain low (∼ 3%, n = 158 to 209), 256 , 257 especially in early disease. For recent reviews, see Yeh et al. 252 and Xie et al. 256

Longitudinal assessment: In a 2‐year study, MCI patients showed a 3% decline in superficial and deep capillary plexus density (n = 19), while age‐matched controls exhibited minimal change (n = 37, risk of conversion to AD high at 37%). The seven MCI patients that converted to AD displayed no further OCTA deterioration, likely because most vascular loss had already occurred. 258 Such short‐term changes may be negligible given the device resolution and only moderate to good measurement repeatability. 255

Vascular reactivity and blood flow

The Dynamic Vessel Analyzer employs OCT imaging with light flicker to induce vasodilation followed by vasoconstriction, a biomarker of vascular reactivity. It also uses multispectral imaging to assess blood oxygenation. A significant arteriovenous oxygenation difference is noted when comparing MCI/AD to controls (SMD = 0.70). 259 Limited data from two studies on light flicker‐induced vasodilation show mixed results, with negligible differences in arterial dilation between MCI/AD and controls (SMD = 0.10, n = 90) 259 and medium‐sized differences when vascular risk factors were greater in AD (MCI vs controls: SMD = 0.4; AD vs controls: SMD = 1.6, n = 56). 260 Vascular risk factors in the control group were not reported. Larger differences were observed when measuring the difference between flicker‐induced arterial dilation and post‐flicker vasoconstriction (MCI vs controls: SMD ≥1, n = 12 MCI, n = 32 controls; AD vs controls: SMD ≥ 2, n = 12 AD). 260

The Retinal Function Imager provides in vivo retinal perfusion maps and blood flow rates, showing large differences in blood flow relative to retinal capillary density when comparing AD to controls (SMD = 2, n = 34, accounting for vascular risk factors). 261 Similar findings are noted for choroidal blood flow based on OCTA (SMD = 0.85, n = 36, age‐ and sex‐matched). 262 We did not find data on MCI or preclinical states.

While the aforementioned studies focused on middle‐aged and older adults, arteriolar and venular diameters from fundus photography can estimate brain structural measures in adolescents with or without bipolar disorder, 263 which may be applicable to early AD detection in younger populations. Other retinal vascular changes, such as retinal hemorrhages in individuals with cerebral amyloid angiopathy, may also serve as specific biomarkers or indicate hypertensive or sporadic cerebrovascular disease. 248

Retinal fundus photography

Retinopathy of any kind on fundoscopic images, such as focal arterial narrowing, has a small association with dementia (OR = 1.51 [1.14 to 1.99]) or MCI (OR = 1.97 [1.27 to 3.06]). 264 Retinopathy of any kind similarly correlates with white matter hyperintensities and lacunar or cerebral infarction (OR = 1.94 to 1.99; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.25; n = 3092 to 11,099), even after adjusting for vascular risks and study quality. 265 However, the longitudinal association with cognition fades, whereas associations with neuroimaging markers of atrophy or stroke persist. 264

Overall, early studies suggest medium to large effects for eye vascular studies, indicating that retinal and choroidal vascular imaging may be more promising than retinal thickness, providing valuable insights beyond traditional vascular risk factors.

5.2.4. OCT and electroretinography

Electroretinography measures retinal electrical activity in response to light, revealing GCL dysfunction in preclinical AD in two studies (n < 50). 266 , 267 Pattern electroretinograms show similar performance to hyperspectral imaging (AUC = 0.84 [0.72 to 0.95], n = 29) 266 using photopic negative response amplitude and N95 implicit time 266 as estimators of GCL dysfunction. 268 Preclinical AD participants with higher Aβ loads can be identified with good accuracy using electroretinogram and GCL‐IPL thickness (AUC = 0.90 [0.81 to 0.99], n = 49). 267 However, as a limitation, performing an electroretinogram can be cumbersome.

5.2.5. OCT optophysiology and elastography

Optophysiology and neuronal hyperexcitability

Increased neuronal activation in the cortex and hippocampus is linked to faster cognitive decline, followed by hypoactivation in later disease stages. 61 , 269 One non‐invasive method for estimating neuronal excitability in the retina is to measure the intrinsic optical signal from photoreceptors stimulated by light. In a study using the 3xTg‐AD mouse model, the intrinsic optical signal showed a significant difference compared to controls by month 4 (0.29 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.06, SMD = 1.2, n = 22, figure 4B2 of Ma 2023 270 ). This neuronal hyperactivity signal appeared 1 month earlier than structural changes, such as inner retinal thickness loss, which became evident by 6 months. This inner retinal thickness loss can be observed in humans with MCI aged 50 to 60 years. 1

Elastography

Future clinical applications of OCT elastography may enable the detection of arteriosclerosis in the choroid or assessment of the elasticity of other retinal layers. 271 , 272 However, this may primarily apply to the middle and outer choroidal layers, which contain medium‐ to large‐sized vessels, as the inner layers consist of fenestrated capillaries. 273 Research on retinal tissue elasticity changes in AD remains limited, and studies of brain magnetic resonance elastography in AD are in the early stages. 274

Currently, no human studies have examined retinal neuronal hyperactivity or OCT elastography.

5.2.6. Imaging retinal amyloid: fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging

Detecting Aβ in the retina is challenging, as only 0.6% of the retinal surface contains these deposits. 275 Ex vivo and in vivo studies have attempted to use curcumin for autofluorescence imaging of retinal Aβ 276 ; however, the results remain uncertain. 277 A review of six studies involving >100 participants highlighted that most Aβ is located in the far periphery of the retina, complicating detection due to overlap with other conditions, including age‐related macular degeneration and aging. Additionally, automatic quantification methods are lacking, and confounding factors, such as age, sex, vascular risk factors, or head size, were often not included in analyses correlating retinal findings with brain or fluid biomarkers. 276 Two methods that show the most promise are discussed next.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO)

This method measures the duration of natural autofluorescence in the retina. A pilot study (n = 15) indicated a small unadjusted correlation between FLIO parameters and cerebrospinal Aβ (r = −0.5 to −0.6) and tau (r = 0.5 to 0.6) levels. However, age differences between groups may have influenced these results. 278 FLIO lifetimes increase with age (= 0.60 to 0.80, n = 97), 279 as do cerebrospinal Aβ concentrations. 280

Hyperspectral imaging

This method captures images across a wide range of wavelengths to identify distinct patterns associated with Aβ. In a post mortem animal study, this technology successfully detected Aβ in the neocortex and vessel walls of aged squirrel monkeys. 281 In vivo human retinal imaging can detect brain Aβ based on PET, with the presumption that hyperspectral imaging can detect retinal amyloid deposition in early AD (AUC = 0.82 [0.67 to 0.97] [n = 35]) with good accuracy. Hyperspectral scores correlate with PET Aβ Centiloid values based on a small study (r = 0.46 [0.13 to 0.69], p = 0.008, n = 33), but with a wide range of plausible values. 282 Other studies on hyperspectral imaging combined with additional retinal biomarkers report similar AUC values of 0.74 to 0.85. 283 , 284 Research on imaging tau is ongoing, potentially using a label‐free spectral signature of p‐tau. 285 For a review on Aβ, tau, and hyperspectral imaging in the retina, see Tang et al. 276

Exploring additional imaging modalities

This review focuses on retinal structural imaging using OCT and only briefly mentions fundus photography. While most studies have emphasized structural imaging, evidence on in vivo imaging of Aβ in the retina and its association with brain Aβ accumulation, 286 total gray matter, 287 hippocampal volume, 288 and global cognition 288 is accumulating. Notable examples include a proof‐of‐concept study that detected Aβ deposits in fundus imaging correlating with PET levels (n = 4) 289 and findings that retinal vessel pulsation in response to flicker‐induced light stimulation positively correlates with brain Aβ in PET. 290 Currently, there is no in vivo retinal imaging of tau in humans. For a review of other ocular biomarkers not discussed here, refer to Wu et al. 291

5.3. Brain–retina correlation: brain imaging, fluid biomarkers, and retinal imaging

5.3.1. Magnetic resonance imaging

Significant associations between retinal OCT and brain structural MRI are mixed, primarily involving pRNFL and inner retinal layers, especially the GCL, with gray and white matter in the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, as well as the hippocampus, while frontal lobe associations are less common (Table 3, Table S2). The temporal lobe and the hippocampus are important for diagnosing AD and predicting cognitive decline. 292

TABLE 3.

Significant associations in brain MRI and retinal optical coherence tomography in select studies.

GM+WM
Retina Frontal Temporal Parietal Occipital BG‐Th Total HP Total
Gray matter (GM)
Macula
GCC 1 1 1 1 1
GCL 2, 7 a 2 3, 2 3 2 2
IPL 2 2 2 2
GC‐IPL 8, 11 1, 8 1 12 1, 12
Fovea 11
mRNFL 4 1 1, 4 1, 4
mTotal 1 7, 10 4, 9, 10 1, 4 4 1, 9, 10 1, 4 1, 4
pRNFL 2 2, 5 a , 7 a , 8 3, 2, 5 a , 11 3 2 2, 6, 5 a
White matter (WM)
Macula
GCC 1
GCL 2 2, 7 a 2 2 2
IPL 2 2 2 2
GC‐IPL 1
Fovea
mRNFL 4
mTotal 7 a 4 4 4
pRNFL 2 2, 5 a , 7 a 2 12 2 12 12

Note: Refer to Table S2a for more details on each included study in the footnotes. Refer to Table S2b for non‐significant effects. Refer to Table 4 for effect sizes of whole brain and temporal lobe structures.

Abbreviations: BG‐Th, basal ganglia / thalamus (central or subcortical) brain region; GCC, ganglion cell complex; GCL, ganglion cell layer; GC‐IPL, ganglion cell‐inner plexiform layers; GM, gray matter; HP, hippocampus; IPL, Inner plexiform layer; mRNFL, macular retinal nerve fiber layer; pRNFL, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; WM, white matter.

a

Indicates that grey and white matter were reported together and not separately.

References: (1) Chua et al., 3 n = 2131; (2) Mutlu et al., 4 n = 2124; (3) Mutlu et al., 5 n = 2235; (4) Sergott et al., 6 n varied by brain region = 656 to 1111; (5) Shi et al., 185 n = 80; (6) Mendez‐Gomez et al., 293 n = 97; (7) Casaletto et al., 294 n = 79; (8) Ong et al., 295 n = 164; (9) den Haan et al., 296 n = 30; (10) den Haan et al., 297 n = 134; (11) Mejia‐Vergara et al., 298 n = 20; (12) Barrett‐Young et al., 299 n = 818 to 828.

References with n > 100 and adjusted for age and sex: (1) Chua et al., 3 (2) Multu et al., 4 (3) Multu et al., 5 (4) Sergott et al., 6 (8) Ong et al. 295

The Rotterdam studies 4 , 5 suggest that changes in the pRNFL and GCL may be associated with brain white matter changes that are not visible on structural imaging but can be detected via diffusion tensor imaging. The GCL was better at estimating visual pathway structures, while the pRNFL was better at estimating global brain changes. 5 A selection of these white matter regions, such as the corpus callosum, connect visual cortices but are not traditionally part of the visual pathway. 300 , 301

Research can be furthered by studying the association between retinal measures, such as pRNFL thickness, and white matter pathways responsible for cognitive modulation that are vulnerable to AD pathology, including the cholinergic projection pathways from the nbM to the neocortex. 179 , 302 , 303 While limited research exists on using OCTA to estimate white matter tract damage in the brain, current evidence shows that superficial plexus OCTA measures have negligible correlation with white matter hyperintensities on MRI in normal controls or those with cognitive decline (β = −0.04 to 0.05). 304

Effect sizes vary; correlations between the whole brain or hippocampus with retinal thickness measures are generally small (r = 0.12 to 0.23, n = 948 to 1111) 6 but can be medium to large in smaller studies (r = −0.44, n = 30) 296 (Table 4, Table S3), with the magnitude of the correlation halving when adjusting for head size. 299 Standardized regression coefficients considering head size, age, and sex are typically small (β = −0.02 to −0.10) for the whole brain and its smaller structures, such as the hippocampus. 3 , 4

TABLE 4.

Effect size magnitude and direction when estimating whole brain or temporal lobe structures from retinal thickness in select cross‐sectional studies.

Reference Whole brain Temporal lobe / HP Coefficient type Adjusted for Analysis sample
Chua et al. 3 −0.08 −0.03 to −0.05 Standardized regression coefficient A, H, S, o 2131
Multu et al. 5 Positive association a Positive association a a A, H, S, o 2235
Mutlu et al. 4 −0.03 to −0.05 −0.03 to −0.06 Standardized regression coefficient A, H, S, o 2124
Sergott et al. 6 0.23 0.12 Pearson r 948 to 1111
Mendez‐Gomez et al. 293 0.17 b 0.01 b Unstandardized regression coefficient b A, S, o 90 to 97
Shi et al. 185 0.12 to 0.06 Pearson r 80
Casaletto et al. 294 0.23 to 0.30 c Standardized regression coefficient A, H, S, o 75
Ong et al. 295 −2.32 to −2.77 d Standardized regression coefficient A, H, S, o 164
den Haan et al. 296 −0.44 Spearman r 30
den Haan et al. 297 < 0.01 to −0.31 −0.11 to −0.20 Standardized regression coefficient A, S 134
Mejia‐Vergara et al. 298 0.03 to 0.04 Standardized regression coefficient A, o 20
Barrett‐Young et al. 299 , e

0.04 to 0.14

−0.08 to −0.09

0.02 to 0.10 Standardized regression coefficient H, S, o 818 to 828

Note: See Table S3 for details. Retina thickness is measured by optical coherence tomography. Effect sizes are based on standardized regression or correlation coefficients. These effect sizes are typically smaller (by 10 folds at times) when accounting for head size and age for brain volumes and just age for cortical thickness in comparison to unadjusted regression coefficients or Pearson's r. The direction of effect is not always the same in different studies, even when using similar predictors and outcomes, possibly indicating that effect sizes are close to zero (no effect).

Abbreviations: A, age; H, head size in model as predictor or fraction of brain volume to head size used; HP, hippocampus; o, other variables such as vascular risk factors; S, sex.

a

Based on result description and positive t‐values of the voxel‐based morphometry analysis output; no coefficients provided for regression models based on brain volumes.

b

Per 10 μ m retina change, which is close to one standard deviation change in retinal measure.

c

An outlier study in that effect sizes are large despite accounting for age and head size.

d

Magnitude not comparable to other studies as retinal measure is outcome not predictor.

e

Study could not assess impact of age, as all ages were 45.

Placing these effects sizes in a clinical context is particularly relevant when considering the typical macular thickness difference in the population (39 µm) or between normal controls and AD (5 to 15 µm), 1 as well as the typical differences in hippocampal (1 to 2 cc) and total gray matter (10 to 25 cc) volumes between normal controls, MCI, and AD. 305 For example, a 1 standard deviation change in total macular thickness (30 µm) corresponds to a minimal estimated change in hippocampus volume (0.02 cc) or total gray matter volume (2.4 cc), which may lack clinical utility (values are from UK Biobank data fields: 27800, 27801, 26641, 26663, and 25005, the difference in population [39 µm] is in the first and ninth deciles in the UK Biobank, and regression estimates are from Chua et al. 3 ).

When examining the total retina versus retinal layers, the occipital lobe shows above‐average associations with retinal measures, but they remain small (−0.05 to −0.08). Standardized regression coefficients show little change (0.01 to 0.04) when comparing total macular thickness to inner retinal layers, 3 , 4 indicating limited gains in measuring individual retinal layer thickness (Tables 2 and 4).

Limitations in our discussion include the lack of a formal meta‐analysis to separate diagnostic group effects and the limited number of longitudinal studies, 306 , 307 which show minimal changes (<5 µm) in retinal layer thickness over a 2‐year follow‐up period. 11 , 232 Longitudinal cohorts, such as the UK Biobank 3 and Dunedin study, 299 may provide future insights with longer follow‐ups.

5.3.2. Positron emission tomography

Data on the association between brain Aβ or tau on PET and retinal imaging are limited. A small to medium negative correlation exists between changes in macula thickness and the PET amyloid standardized uptake value ratio in a 1‐ to 2‐year follow‐up of a small sample (= −0.09 to −0.20, n = 11 to 12) when not accounting for confounders. Assuming this correlation is equivalent to an unadjusted β in a regression model, 308 a 10‐µm decrease in retinal thickness corresponds to a 0.01 increase in the PET amyloid uptake value. 6 Given typical PET uptake values (0.5 to 3) 309 and previously mentioned retinal thickness variations between cohorts or in the population (5 to 39 µm), this results in a negligible change of 0.05 in PET values detected by retinal thickness measures.

Upon closer examination of individual retinal layers, the IPL, which appeared thicker at baseline in one study, underwent slow thinning during a 2‐year follow‐up in preclinical AD individuals with brain Aβ deposits. 11 , 232 , 233 The initial association of IPL with brain Aβ in that study in which IPL appeared thicker at baseline (SMD = 0.88, r = 0.31, p = 0.029, n = 63) 233 was lost in the longitudinal follow‐up (b = −0.014, p = 0.144, n = 56). 11 Instead, the macular RNFL thickness change was negligibly associated with the brain Aβ change over 2 years (r = 0.02) when accounting for age. 11 The authors 233 noted retinal inclusion bodies in the IPL, potentially containing Aβ, and highlighted similarities between the IPL and neocortex, both showing changes in regions with high cholinergic synaptic activity and Aβ accumulation. This initial increase in IPL thickness is similar to the findings in the earlier study mentioned in Section 5.1.1, regarding cholinergic septal nuclei in cognitively normal individuals at risk for AD, which also demonstrated increased volume. 169 This suggests that early signs in preclinical AD may not always involve atrophy.

At least one study found no association between retinal GCL thickness and Aβ PET, 290 indicating mixed results regarding retinal thickness measures and brain Aβ. However, that study did show an association between Aβ PET and retinal and venular artery pulsation. 290 A validation of these associations will depend on ongoing studies. 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314

While data are limited on the correlation of brain Aβ PET with retinal amyloid imaging or an electroretinogram, hyperspectral retinal imaging (r = 0.46 [0.13 to 0.69]), 282 curcumin‐labeled autofluorescence deposit counts (r = 0.65 [−0.09 to 0.9]), 289 and a composite measure of visual event‐related potentials (r = −0.54 [−0.70 to −0.30]) 315 suggest small to medium unadjusted correlations (values derived from figure 4a of Javitt et al., 315 with the 95% CIs calculated based on the methodology outlined by Cohen et al. 316 ). These effect sizes may be further influenced by age and other confounders.

5.3.3. Fluid biomarkers: cerebrospinal fluid and plasma

Cerebrospinal fluid

The association of cerebrospinal Aβ or tau with pRNFL or perifoveal retinal thickness is small when accounting for age and sex (β = 0.01 to 0.14 in one study [n = 90], 297 not significant in an earlier study by the same authors [n = 30], 296 and β = −0.07 to 0.05 in another [n = 99] 317 ) (the last study's 317 coefficient was recalculated based on a 12‐µm standard deviation for average pRNFL 308 , 318 ). Stronger associations were noted without considering confounders (r = −0.3 to 0.4). 319

Plasma

The association of plasma p‐tau181 and NfL with pRNFL or GCL‐IPL thickness (β = −0.06 to −0.18, n = 431 to 500) when not considering age appears weak. 320 The same is true with p‐tau181, p‐tau217, Aβ42/40, NfL, and more novel indicators of retinal gliosis when considering age (recalculated β from Figure 1 estimated at <0.05, n = 82). 321

No studies on Aβ or GFAP plasma biomarkers were found.

6. Study design and statistical considerations

6.1. Diagnostic criteria

For studies assessing diagnostic accuracy, aligning the diagnosis with the current biological definition of AD is preferred 13 ; however, the biological definition may not always lead to clinical progression to dementia. 200 A meta‐analysis of retinal imaging studies using the biological definition of AD indicated a negligible to small effect size in differentiating controls from AD (SMD = −0.56 [−0.92 to −0.21] for macular RNFL and −0.54 [−1.22 to 0.13] for pRNLF thickness), 322 suggesting uncertainty in its utility. If biological definitions are costly or inaccessible, established country‐ or society‐specific guidelines for AD 323 , 324 or MCI 325 diagnosis can be used. In screening studies, there may be less emphasis on exact diagnoses when assessing general correlations, such as with hippocampal volume.

6.2. Confounders: post mortem time interval, head size, and axial length

The time from death to tissue preservation impacts gene expression and brain subcellular structures 326 ; thus, it is essential to include this interval as a confounder in the analysis. Evidence for retinal changes post mortem is limited and not quantified in terms of macular thickness changes. 327 OCT images suggest retinal detachment may occur within 30 min 247 and retinal edema within the first 6 h post mortem. 328 However, overall thickness changes are minimal after 48 h, 329 likely due to shrinkage or deformity alongside edema and detachment.

Age and head size must be considered when assessing brain volume, while cortical thickness assessments should account for age, sex, and scanner characteristics. 330 Although MRI‐derived intracranial volume is unavailable at screening without neuroimaging, head circumference can serve as a surrogate, moderately correlating with MRI‐derived intracranial volume (r = 0.65 to 0.70, n = 99). 331 No studies have measured the correlation between eye axial length and intracranial volume; however, axial length moderately correlates with head circumference (r = 0.60, n = 40), 332 suggesting a smaller correlation with intracranial volume (r ≈ 0.40).

Incorporating eye axial length into modeling may be beneficial, particularly for measures involving the transverse plane, such as macular volume. 333 If unavailable from optical biometry, axial length can be estimated from brain MRI with an accuracy of 0.1 to 0.8 mm compared to the reference standard, which is clinically acceptable. 334 When including axial length alongside head size, it is best to check for multicollinearity to ensure the reliability of regression coefficients.

6.3. Side and multilevel modeling

For right and left retinal measures, several approaches exist: (1) using one side predominantly, 5 (2) randomly selecting either side, 3 (3) using the lowest value from either side, 293 (4) reporting both sides separately, 6 (5) averaging values, 297 or (6) entering side as a random effect in a multilevel model. An exploratory analysis can help determine the best approach based on side differences and associations with outcomes.

6.4. Multiple testing, effect size, uncertainty of estimates, and clinical usefulness

Given the numerous sectors in retinal imaging studies, conducting factor analysis or dimensionality reduction may simplify the analysis by aggregating sectors through averages or latent components. This approach can help identify clinically relevant effects in smaller samples (n < 100) by reducing the number of multiple tests.

Effect size cut‐off suggestions for gerontology research indicate that Pearson r values of 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 are small, medium, and large, respectively, while between‐group SMDs (Cohen's d) or Hedges’ g values of 0.15, 0.40, and 0.75 are similarly categorized. 335 Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients can be used to calculate standardized regression coefficients in simple linear regression, 308 and the aforementioned cut‐off values may also be used to interpret the magnitude of standardized regression coefficients.

The f 2 effect size can compare the variance explained by models with and without retinal biomarkers, quantifying the retinal contribution toward the estimation 336 , 337 , 338 :

f2=Rfullmodel2Rreducedmodel21Rfullmodel2

Here, R 2 represents the variability in the outcome measure, such as hippocampal volume, that is explained by the model using predictors including retinal measures and age. Both models include all non‐retinal variables, differing only in the inclusion of retinal measures in the full model. f 2 values of 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 are considered small, medium, and large effects, respectively. 337 , 338

Interpreting effect sizes is most meaningful after considering confounders through partial correlation or multiple regression coefficients. Methods also exist for quantifying a predictor's influence on an outcome by calculating a variable importance score. 339 For instance, a score >0.8 may indicate a useful predictor in models such as partial least‐squares regression. 340

Most studies report regression or correlation coefficients and p values. Reporting standardized regression coefficients alongside measures of uncertainty of the estimate, such as standard error or CIs, aids in comparing effect sizes across models and studies. 308 It is important to consider the lower bound of the CI to ensure that the smallest plausible differences exceed the resolution of the imaging device (>5 µm) or are clinically meaningful; otherwise, the results may lack clinical utility.

In summary, accounting for readily available confounders, such as age and sex, ensures that retinal OCT adds meaningful information. Measures such as head circumference or MRI‐derived intracranial volumes should be included in models estimating brain volumes. In post mortem studies, results should be adjusted for the time from death to data acquisition. Recommendations for harmonizing methodologies were summarized previously by Alber et al. 27

6.5. Other considerations and study limitations

In several investigations, retinal measures were treated as outcomes (dependent variables), 9 , 295 , 321 , 341 a distinction that can affect study interpretation and pooling of effect sizes.

The repeatability of retinal thickness and vascular imaging metrics ranges from poor to good, depending on population characteristics, comorbidities (e.g., glaucoma), imaging protocols, and specific metrics. 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 Vessel density measures often show lower repeatability than thickness or perfusion, especially when comparing wide to narrow fields. 342 , 347

Most in vivo OCT studies feature sample sizes >100; however, post mortem and novel modality studies remain small. Nearly all studies exclude participants with ophthalmic or systemic conditions, such as diabetes (5% to 25% age‐standardized prevalence at 18 years) 348 and glaucoma (1% to 5% prevalence under age 60 years), 349 limiting generalizability. For example, in a UK Biobank study, 57% of individuals with both retinal OCT and brain MRI were excluded due to these conditions, with an additional 25% of the remainder removed for poor image quality, resulting in only ∼30% of the original cohort being analyzed. 3

7. Datasets for research

Our team has completed the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04104373), involving 520 individuals with neurodegenerative diseases. Participants were phenotyped using clinical data, structural and functional MRI, genomics, plasma biomarkers (e.g., Aβ and tau), and assessments of gait, speech, language, and eye tracking, among others. Retinal OCT retinal imaging was acquired in over half of the cohort. Follow‐up lasted 1 to 3 years for those with AD, Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and frontotemporal dementia. 350 , 351 The baseline data of this study was released in June 2022 (accessible at https://www.braincode.ca/content/controlled‐data‐releases). Additionally, the Brain Eye Amyloid Memory (BEAM) study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02524405) is under way, utilizing Aβ PET imaging and similar assessments and cohorts, as well as Lewy body disease. 310 Other available cohorts include smaller preclinical AD cohorts (n < 300), 232 , 233 the Rotterdam study (n > 3000), 4 , 352 the UK Biobank (n > 65,000), 3 , 353 , 354 and the Dunedin study (n > 800). 299

Large‐scale data collection for OCT‐A studies is also under way in the Netherlands (Maastricht and Rotterdam studies), Germany (Rhineland study), the United States (Framingham study), and India (South Indian Genetics of Diabetic Retinopathy [SIGNATR] study). 355

8. Future directions

Risk stratification and monitoring for adverse events, such as ARIA, are currently needed in anti‐amyloid therapy. Parallel to the brain exhibiting blood–brain barrier dysfunction and being prone to ARIA during anti‐amyloid therapy, the retina also exhibits vascular Aβ, compromised endothelial tight junctions, 128 and neuroinflammation 118 in AD. Combining promising retinal imaging modalities, such as OCTA to estimate small vessel disease (Section 5.2.3) and hyperspectral imaging to assess amyloid deposition (Section 5.2.6), may serve as a novel screening tool to identify those at risk of ARIA.

Furthermore, cell segmentation in higher‐resolution OCT using machine learning is promising. With retinal OCT images acquired at a cellular resolution, machine‐learning algorithms could segment and quantify subcellular structures, such as ganglion cell nuclei, which may be more informative than thickness, as retinal thinning can be masked by early AD processes. 26 Our lab has developed a Bayesian 3D convolutional neural network with a U‐Net architecture for automatic segmentation and uncertainty estimation in the brain 173 ; a similar solution could be applied to retinal segmentation. A significant challenge is obtaining large enough datasets to train generalizable models. Recent models in retinal imaging have been reviewed by Bahr et al. 356

Additionally, underexplored brain regions, such as the basal forebrain, may correlate with ganglion cell nucleus count or GCL thickness due to their shared cholinergic properties. Finally, newer modalities such as choroidal thickness measurements, OCTA, electroretinogram, and hyperspectral imaging require further studies in preclinical AD and MCI to pool effect sizes in future meta‐analyses.

9. Conclusion

In summary, this review examines the relationship between AD pathology in the brain – particularly Aβ, tau, and vascular changes – and corresponding alterations in the retina. Evidence suggests abnormal Aβ and tau deposits in the retina may reflect brain pathology, although their forms may differ. Whether these deposits form through cell‐to‐cell transfer or de novo formation remains unclear. Post mortem studies indicate that retinal vascular changes may mirror brain pathology; however, data on other co‐pathologies are limited.

Retinal thickness changes, especially in layers with acetylcholine‐producing cells, are evident when comparing AD patients to controls, though this ability diminishes in early AD, consistent with recent meta‐analyses. 2 , 322 Correlations between retinal thickness and brain structures are also often weak when accounting for confounders, reducing diagnostic utility. Emerging higher‐resolution OCT techniques, however, may enhance diagnostic capabilities by quantifying cellular structures; however, physiological changes can mask gains from higher resolution. 357 , 358 , 359

In contrast to retinal thickness measures, choroidal thickness shows promise, with larger effect sizes, as does vascular imaging, such as OCTA. However, studies on these methods are limited, and their effect sizes may decline somewhat when results are pooled and factors such as age, sex, and vascular risk factors are accounted for. We also discuss promising experimental retinal imaging techniques in AD, including hyperspectral image analysis for estimating retinal Aβ, and functional OCT methods. Further advancements in the most promising retinal biomarkers and their combination with other biomarkers may improve early AD screening and treatment monitoring.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: MAB, SEB. Data curation: MAB, SHK, XJ, MK, JO. Formal analysis: MAB. Funding acquisition: MAB, SEB. Investigation: MAB, SHK, XJ, MK, JO, SEB, MG. Methodology: MAB, SHK, XJ, MK, SEB, MG. Project administration: MAB. Resources: MAB, SEB. Software: MAB. Supervision: SEB, MG, CH, PJK, RHS. Validation: MAB. Visualization (figures and tables): MAB, SHK, XJ, MK. Writing – original draft: MAB, SHK, XJ, MK. Writing – review & editing: MAB, SHK, XJ, MK, JO, RHS, PJK, CH, MG, SEB.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

MAB: None relevant to this manuscript. Graduate scholarships from Canadian Institutes of Health Research—Canadian Graduate Scholarship – Doctorate, Vision Science Research Program, Peterborough K.M. Hunter Graduate Scholarship, Queen Elizabeth II / Grace Lumsden and Margaret Nicholds, Graduate Scholarship in Science & Technology, Institute of Medical Science / University of Toronto Open Fellowship Award SCACE Graduate Fellowship in Alzheimer's Research, Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) Award. SHK: None declared. XJ: None declared. MK: None declared. JO: None relevant to this manuscript. Grants from Alzheimer's Association & Brain Canada (24AARF‐1242638), BrightFocus (A2024012F), Alzheimer Society of Canada. RHS: None relevant to this manuscript. Funds from Ontario Brain Institute, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health. Payments made to institutions, not individuals. Follow MD Inc. (stock ownership). CH: None declared. PJK: None relevant to this manuscript. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Novartis, Bayer, Roche, RegenxBio, Apellis, Astellas. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Apellis, Astellas, Novelty Nobility, Johnson and Johnson, Kriya Therapeutics, AdMare Bioinnovations. Financial support (to institution) – Roche, Novartis, Bayer, RegenxBio, Johnson and Johnson, Neuracle Genetics. MG: None declared. SEB: None relevant to this manuscript. Grants or contract payments made to institution from contract research: Genentech, Optina, Roche, Eli Lilly, Eisa/Biogen Idec, NovoNordisk, Lilly Avid, ICON, Aribio Co., Maplight Therapeutics Peer Reviewed for Ontario Brain Institute, CIHR, Leducq Foundation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, NIH, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, Brain Canada, Weston Brain Institute, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Alzheimer's Association US, Queen's University, Compute Canada Resources for Research Groups, CANARIE, Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada. Consulting fees paid to author or institution from Roche, Biogen, NovoNordisk, Eisai, Eli Lilly, DSR: Diagnosis, Solutions & Results Inc. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events to author from Biogen, Roche New England Journal Manuscript, Roche Models of Care Analysis in Canada in Submission, Eisai MRI Workshop, Cpdnetwork planning committee for AD educational program. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Conference Board of Canada, World Dementia Council, University of Rochester Contribution to the Mission and Scientific Leadership of the Small Vessel VCID Biomarker Validation Consortium, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Ontario Dementia Care Alliance (ODCA). Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

ALZ-21-e70884-s002.pdf (496.7KB, pdf)

Supporting Information

ALZ-21-e70884-s001.docx (181.5KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The first author would like to acknowledge the influence of Dr. Ivan Bodis‐Wollner in sparking his interest in the brain‐eye connection in neurodegenerative diseases. This manuscript was edited for English language by Charlesworth Author Services (www.cwauthors.com). This work was supported by the graduate student scholarships to the first (MAB) and last authors (SEB) from Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships Doctoral Award (Canadian Institutes of Health Research) [fund reference number: 177881], Vision Science Research Program Award, Peterborough K.M. Hunter Graduate Scholarship, Queen Elizabeth II/Grace Lumsden and Margaret Nicholds Graduate Scholarship in Science & Technology (QEII‐GSST), Institute of Medical Science/University of Toronto Open Fellowship Award, SCACE Graduate Fellowship in Alzheimer Research, Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) Award. The last two authors were supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). JO is funded by the Alzheimer's Association [Grant number: 24AARF‐1242638), BrightFocus [Grant number: A2024012F], and the Alzheimer Society of Canada and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR).

Banihashemi MA, Krance SH, Ji PX, et al. Brain and retina in Alzheimer's disease: Pathological intersections and estimates from imaging. Alzheimer's Dement. 2025;21:e70884. 10.1002/alz.70884

Maged Goubran and Sandra E. Black Co‐senior authors.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and in references cited by the paper.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chan VTT, Sun Z, Tang S, et al. Spectral‐Domain OCT Measurements in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:497‐510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Costanzo E, Lengyel I, Parravano M, et al. Ocular Biomarkers for Alzheimer Disease Dementia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141:84‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chua SYL, Lascaratos G, Atan D, et al. Relationships between retinal layer thickness and brain volumes in the UK Biobank cohort. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:1490‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mutlu U, Bonnemaijer PWM, Ikram MA, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration and brain MRI markers: the Rotterdam Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;60:183‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mutlu U, Ikram MK, Roshchupkin GV, et al. Thinner retinal layers are associated with changes in the visual pathway: A population‐based study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39:4290‐301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sergott RC, Raji A, Kost J, et al. Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Metrics Are Unchanged in Verubecestat Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial but Correlate with Baseline Regional Brain Atrophy. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79:275‐87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Merten N, Paulsen AJ, Pinto AA, et al. Macular Ganglion Cell‐Inner Plexiform Layer as a Marker of Cognitive and Sensory Function in Midlife. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75:e42–e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sanchez D, Castilla‐Marti M, Marquie M, et al. Evaluation of macular thickness and volume tested by optical coherence tomography as biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cheng DL, Thompson L, Snyder PJ. A Potential Association Between Retinal Changes, Subjective Memory Impairment, and Anxiety in Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease: A 27‐Month Pilot Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ko F, Muthy ZA, Gallacher J, et al. Association of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning With Current and Future Cognitive Decline: A Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1198‐205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Santos CY, Johnson LN, Sinoff SE, Festa EK, Heindel WC, Snyder PJ. Change in retinal structural anatomy during the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018;10:196‐209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hane FT, Robinson M, Lee BY, Bai O, Leonenko Z, Albert MS. Recent Progress in Alzheimer's Disease Research, Part 3: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57:645‐65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Jack CR, Jr. , Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535‐62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cummings J. The Role of Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development. In: Guest PC, editor. Reviews on Biomarker Studies in Psychiatric and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 29‐61. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lawrence E, Vegvari C, Ower A, Hadjichrysanthou C, De Wolf F, Anderson RM. A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies Which Measure Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59:1359‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Silverman DH, Gambhir SS, Huang HW, et al. Evaluating early dementia with and without assessment of regional cerebral metabolism by PET: a comparison of predicted costs and benefits. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:253‐66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bermingham SL. The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work‐up of dementia: an economic literature review and cost‐effectiveness analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14:1‐67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Leal J, Luengo‐Fernandez R, Stratton IM, Dale A, Ivanova K, Scanlon PH. Cost‐effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow‐up for patients with screen‐positive maculopathy. Eye (Lond). 2019;33:640‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Baethge C, Goldbeck‐Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA‐a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Krishnamurthy HK, Jayaraman V, Krishna K, et al. An overview of the genes and biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;104:102599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Almutary AG, Begum MY, Kyada AK, et al. Inflammatory signaling pathways in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanistic insights and possible therapeutic interventions. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;104:102548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Singh S, Khan S, Shahid M, Sardar M, Hassan MI, Islam A. Targeting tau in Alzheimer's and beyond: Insights into pathology and therapeutic strategies. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;104:102639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS, Leisgang AM, Salazar AM, Lamb BT. Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018;4:575‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ge YJ, Xu W, Ou YN, et al. Retinal biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;69:101361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Walkiewicz G, Ronisz A, Van Ginderdeuren R, et al. Primary retinal tauopathy: A tauopathy with a distinct molecular pattern. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20:330‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kashani AH, Asanad S, Chan JW, et al. Past, present and future role of retinal imaging in neurodegenerative disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;83:100938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Alber J, Bouwman F, den Haan J, et al. Retina pathology as a target for biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Current status, ophthalmopathological background, challenges, and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20:728‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kaas JH. The origin and evolution of neocortex: From early mammals to modern humans. Prog Brain Res. 2019;250:61‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kaas JH. The evolution of brains from early mammals to humans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013;4:33‐45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Braak H, Del Tredici K. The preclinical phase of the pathological process underlying sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2015;138:2814‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Arendt T, Stieler J, Ueberham U. Is sporadic Alzheimer's disease a developmental disorder? J Neurochem. 2017;143:396‐408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Schultz C, Braak E. Vulnerability of select neuronal types to Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;924:53‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mesulam MM. Cholinergic circuitry of the human nucleus basalis and its fate in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2013;521:4124‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ovsepian SV, O'Leary VB, Hoschl C, Zaborszky L. Integrated phylogeny of the human brain and pathobiology of Alzheimer's disease: A unifying hypothesis. Neurosci Lett. 2021;755:135895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Woolf NJ. Cholinergic systems in mammalian brain and spinal cord. Prog Neurobiol. 1991;37:475‐524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Koenig KM, Gross JM. Evolution and development of complex eyes: a celebration of diversity. Development. 2020;147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Martin JH. Neuroanatomy : text and atlas. 5th ed. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Semba K. Phylogenetic and ontogenetic aspects of the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and their innervation of the cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res. 2004;145:3‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Heavner W, Pevny L. Eye development and retinogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a008391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ohuchi H, Sato K, Habuta M, Fujita H, Bando T. Congenital eye anomalies: More mosaic than thought? Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2019;59:56‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wilson SW, Houart C. Early steps in the development of the forebrain. Dev Cell. 2004;6:167‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhao B, Li Y, Fan Z, et al. Eye‐brain connections revealed by multimodal retinal and brain imaging genetics. Nat Commun. 2024;15:6064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gremer L, Scholzel D, Schenk C, et al. Fibril structure of amyloid‐beta(1‐42) by cryo‐electron microscopy. Science. 2017;358:116‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Medina M, Avila J. The role of extracellular Tau in the spreading of neurofibrillary pathology. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Spires‐Jones TL, Hyman BT. The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2014;82:756‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Congdon EE, Sigurdsson EM. Tau‐targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:399‐415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH, et al. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;71:362‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ottoy J, Kang MS, Tan JXM, et al. Tau follows principal axes of functional and structural brain organization in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun. 2024;15:5031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Busche MA, Hyman BT. Synergy between amyloid‐beta and tau in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1183‐93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M. Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:684‐96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ottoy J, Ozzoude M, Zukotynski K, et al. Vascular burden and cognition: Mediating roles of neurodegeneration and amyloid PET. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19:1503‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Robinson AC, Roncaroli F, Chew‐Graham S, et al. The Contribution of Vascular Pathology Toward Cognitive Impairment in Older Individuals with Intermediate Braak Stage Tau Pathology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77:1005‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community‐dwelling older persons. Neurology. 2007;69:2197‐204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Neuropathology Group. Medical Research Council Cognitive F , Aging S. Pathological correlates of late‐onset dementia in a multicentre, community‐based population in England and Wales. Neuropathology Group of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Lancet. 2001;357:169‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain. 2019;142:1503‐27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Lam B, Masellis M, Freedman M, Stuss DT, Black SE. Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Abner EL, Kryscio RJ, Schmitt FA, et al. Outcomes after diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in a large autopsy series. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:549‐59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Sweeney MD, Montagne A, Sagare AP, et al. Vascular dysfunction‐The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:158‐67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:388‐405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hamilton RL. Lewy bodies in Alzheimer's disease: a neuropathological review of 145 cases using alpha‐synuclein immunohistochemistry. Brain Pathol. 2000;10:378‐84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Targa Dias Anastacio H, Matosin N, Ooi L. Neuronal hyperexcitability in Alzheimer's disease: what are the drivers behind this aberrant phenotype? Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:960‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Uemura N, Uemura MT, Luk KC, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. Cell‐to‐Cell Transmission of Tau and alpha‐Synuclein. Trends Mol Med. 2020;26:936‐52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Kaufman SK, Del Tredici K, Thomas TL, Braak H, Diamond MI. Tau seeding activity begins in the transentorhinal/entorhinal regions and anticipates phospho‐tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease and PART. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:57‐67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Villemagne VL, Fodero‐Tavoletti MT, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Tau imaging: early progress and future directions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:114‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Arnsten AFT, Datta D, Del Tredici K, Braak H. Hypothesis: Tau pathology is an initiating factor in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:115‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer's disease‐related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16:271‐8; discussion 8‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Yushkevich PA, Munoz Lopez M, Iniguez de Onzono Martin MM, et al. Three‐dimensional mapping of neurofibrillary tangle burden in the human medial temporal lobe. Brain. 2021;144:2784‐97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Khan AR, Ottoy J, Goubran M. Towards a comprehensive 3D mapping of tau progression in early Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2021;144:2565‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease‐associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112:389‐404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Schmidt ML, Zhukareva V, Perl DP, et al. Spinal cord neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer disease and Guam Parkinsonism‐dementia complex. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001;60:1075‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Dugger BN, Hidalgo JA, Chiarolanza G, et al. The distribution of phosphorylated tau in spinal cords of Alzheimer's disease and non‐demented individuals. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:529‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Xie Q, Zhao WJ, Ou GY, Xue WK. An Overview of Experimental and Clinical Spinal Cord Findings in Alzheimer's Disease. Brain Sci. 2019;9:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Guo Y, Wang L, Zhu M, et al. Detection of hyperphosphorylated tau protein and alpha‐synuclein in spinal cord of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:445‐52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Mesulam M, Shaw P, Mash D, Weintraub S. Cholinergic nucleus basalis tauopathy emerges early in the aging‐MCI‐AD continuum. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:815‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Cantero JL, Atienza M, Lage C, et al. Atrophy of Basal Forebrain Initiates with Tau Pathology in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:2083‐98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Coppola JJ, Disney AA. Is There a Canonical Cortical Circuit for the Cholinergic System? Anatomical Differences Across Common Model Systems. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW. Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Circuits and Signaling in Cognition and Cognitive Decline. Neuron. 2016;91:1199‐218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Braak H, Del Tredici K. Neuroanatomy and pathology of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2015;215:1‐162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H. Phases of A beta‐deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. 2002;58:1791‐800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Sardar Sinha M, Ansell‐Schultz A, Civitelli L, et al. Alzheimer's disease pathology propagation by exosomes containing toxic amyloid‐beta oligomers. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:41‐56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Toledo JB, Arnold SE, Raible K, et al. Contribution of cerebrovascular disease in autopsy confirmed neurodegenerative disease cases in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Centre. Brain. 2013;136:2697‐706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Power MC, Mormino E, Soldan A, et al. Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia. Ann Neurol. 2018;84:10‐22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Hartz AM, Bauer B, Soldner EL, et al. Amyloid‐beta contributes to blood‐brain barrier leakage in transgenic human amyloid precursor protein mice and in humans with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Stroke. 2012;43:514‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Korte N, Nortley R, Attwell D. Cerebral blood flow decrease as an early pathological mechanism in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;140:793‐810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Apatiga‐Perez R, Soto‐Rojas LO, Campa‐Cordoba BB, et al. Neurovascular dysfunction and vascular amyloid accumulation as early events in Alzheimer's disease. Metab Brain Dis. 2022;37:39‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Pikkarainen M, Kauppinen T, Alafuzoff I. Hyperphosphorylated tau in the occipital cortex in aged nondemented subjects. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:653‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Pearson RC, Esiri MM, Hiorns RW, Wilcock GK, Powell TP. Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:4531‐4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Keage HA, Carare RO, Friedland RP, et al. Population studies of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy and dementia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Jellinger KA. Alzheimer disease and cerebrovascular pathology: an update. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2002;109:813‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Attems J, Jellinger KA. Only cerebral capillary amyloid angiopathy correlates with Alzheimer pathology–a pilot study. Acta Neuropathol. 2004;107:83‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Greenberg SM, Vonsattel JP. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Sensitivity and specificity of cortical biopsy. Stroke. 1997;28:1418‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Boyle PA, Yu L, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Person‐specific contribution of neuropathologies to cognitive loss in old age. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:74‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Parvizi J, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio A. The selective vulnerability of brainstem nuclei to Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2001;49:53‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Leuba G, Saini K. Pathology of subcortical visual centres in relation to cortical degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1995;21:410‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Iseki E, Matsushita M, Kosaka K, Kondo H, Ishii T, Amano N. Distribution and morphology of brain stem plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 1989;78:131‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Hart de Ruyter FJ, Morrema THJ, den Haan J, et al. Phosphorylated tau in the retina correlates with tau pathology in the brain in Alzheimer's disease and primary tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145:197‐218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Erskine D, Taylor JP, Firbank MJ, et al. Changes to the lateral geniculate nucleus in Alzheimer's disease but not dementia with Lewy bodies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2016;42:366‐76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Fujita N, Tanaka H, Takanashi M, et al. Lateral geniculate nucleus: anatomic and functional identification by use of MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1719‐26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Scinto LF, Frosch M, Wu CK, Daffner KR, Gedi N, Geula C. Selective cell loss in Edinger‐Westphal in asymptomatic elders and Alzheimer's patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:729‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Kusne Y, Wolf AB, Townley K, Conway M, Peyman GA. Visual system manifestations of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e668–e76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Stopa EG, Volicer L, Kuo‐Leblanc V, et al. Pathologic evaluation of the human suprachiasmatic nucleus in severe dementia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:29‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Hinton DR, Sadun AA, Blanks JC, Miller CA. Optic‐nerve degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:485‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Christen Y, Jucker M, Beyreuther K, Haass C, Nitsch RM, Christen Y. Alois Alzheimer and the myth of the pioneer. Alzheimer: 100 years and beyond. Berlin; New York: Springer; 2006. p. 51‐5. [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Jiang J, Wang H, Li W, Cao X, Li C. Amyloid Plaques in Retina for Diagnosis in Alzheimer's Patients: a Meta‐Analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Guo L, Ravindran N, Shamsher E, Hill D, Cordeiro MF. Retinal Changes in Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2021;18:89‐102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. den Haan J, Morrema THJ, Verbraak FD, et al. Amyloid‐beta and phosphorylated tau in post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease retinas. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6:147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Blanks JC, Hinton DR, Sadun AA, Miller CA. Retinal ganglion cell degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 1989;501:364‐72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Blanks JC, Schmidt SY, Torigoe Y, Porrello KV, Hinton DR, Blanks RH. Retinal pathology in Alzheimer's disease. II. Regional neuron loss and glial changes in GCL. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17:385‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Asanad S, Ross‐Cisneros FN, Nassisi M, Barron E, Karanjia R, Sadun AA. The Retina in Alzheimer's Disease: Histomorphometric Analysis of an Ophthalmologic Biomarker. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:1491‐500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Ho CY, Troncoso JC, Knox D, Stark W, Eberhart CG. Beta‐amyloid, phospho‐tau and alpha‐synuclein deposits similar to those in the brain are not identified in the eyes of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease patients. Brain Pathol. 2014;24:25‐32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Williams EA, McGuone D, Frosch MP, Hyman BT, Laver N, Stemmer‐Rachamimov A. Absence of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes in Eyes of Subjects With Alzheimer Disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76:376‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Lee S, Jiang K, McIlmoyle B, et al. Amyloid Beta Immunoreactivity in the Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer of the Alzheimer's Eye. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Koronyo‐Hamaoui M, Koronyo Y, Ljubimov AV, et al. Identification of amyloid plaques in retinas from Alzheimer's patients and noninvasive in vivo optical imaging of retinal plaques in a mouse model. Neuroimage. 2011;54(Suppl 1):S204‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Tsai Y, Lu B, Ljubimov AV, et al. Ocular changes in TgF344‐AD rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:523‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Schon C, Hoffmann NA, Ochs SM, et al. Long‐term in vivo imaging of fibrillar tau in the retina of P301S transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e53547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. La Morgia C, Ross‐Cisneros FN, Koronyo Y, et al. Melanopsin retinal ganglion cell loss in Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79:90‐109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Koronyo Y, Rentsendorj A, Mirzaei N, et al. Retinal pathological features and proteome signatures of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145:409‐38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Gibbons GS, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ. Mechanisms of Cell‐to‐Cell Transmission of Pathological Tau: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:101‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Peng C, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Protein transmission in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:199‐212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Beckman D, Chakrabarty P, Ott S, et al. A novel tau‐based rhesus monkey model of Alzheimer's pathogenesis. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:933‐45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Simons ES, Smith MA, Dengler‐Crish CM, Crish SD. Retinal ganglion cell loss and gliosis in the retinofugal projection following intravitreal exposure to amyloid‐beta. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;147:105146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Chiasseu M, Alarcon‐Martinez L, Belforte N, et al. Tau accumulation in the retina promotes early neuronal dysfunction and precedes brain pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Gouras GK, Tampellini D, Takahashi RH, Capetillo‐Zarate E. Intraneuronal beta‐amyloid accumulation and synapse pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:523‐41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Davis MR, Robinson E, Koronyo Y, et al. Retinal ganglion cell vulnerability to pathogenic tau in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2025;13:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Apostolova LG, Zarow C, Biado K, et al. Relationship between hippocampal atrophy and neuropathology markers: a 7T MRI validation study of the EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:139‐50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Teipel SJ, Fritz HC, Grothe MJ, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I . Neuropathologic features associated with basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;95:e1301–e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Shi H, Koronyo Y, Fuchs DT, et al. Retinal arterial Abeta(40) deposition is linked with tight junction loss and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in MCI and AD patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19:5185‐97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Goto I, Katsuki S, Ikui H, Kimoto K, Mimatsu T. Pathological studies on the intracerebral and retinal arteries in cerebrovascular and noncerebrovascular diseases. Stroke. 1975;6:263‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Tso MOM, Jampol LM. Pathophysiology of Hypertensive Retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:1132‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Kim SY, Cheon J. Senescence‐associated microvascular endothelial dysfunction: A focus on the blood‐brain and blood‐retinal barriers. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;100:102446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Alpers BJ, Forster FM, Herbut PA. Retinal, cerebral and systemic arteriosclerosis; a histopathologic study. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1948;60:440‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Bridgett CR. Sclerosis of central artery of retina. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1926;9:725‐35. [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Mehrhoff F, Theobalt KG, Barry AG, Hillard R. Histopathological evaluation of geriatric ophthalmic veins: A cadaveric study. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2024;12:191‐7. [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Hart de Ruyter FJ, Morrema THJ, den Haan J, et al. alpha‐Synuclein pathology in post‐mortem retina and optic nerve is specific for alpha‐synucleinopathies. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023;9:124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Galasko D, Hansen LA, Katzman R, et al. Clinical‐neuropathological correlations in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:888‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Surguchov A, McMahan B, Masliah E, Surgucheva I. Synucleins in ocular tissues. J Neurosci Res. 2001;65:68‐77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Dijkstra AA, Morrema THJ, Hart de Ruyter FJ, et al. TDP‐43 pathology in the retina of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;146:767‐70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Taylor WR, Smith RG. The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing. Vis Neurosci. 2012;29:73‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Masland RH. The tasks of amacrine cells. Vis Neurosci. 2012;29:3‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Masland RH, Mills JW. Autoradiographic identification of acetylcholine in the rabbit retina. J Cell Biol. 1979;83:159‐78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Balasubramanian R, Gan L. Development of Retinal Amacrine Cells and Their Dendritic Stratification. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2014;2:100‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Witkovsky P. Dopamine and retinal function. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;108:17‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Faiq MA, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Chan KC. Cholinergic nervous system and glaucoma: From basic science to clinical applications. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;72:100767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Lambiase A, Pagani L, Di Fausto V, et al. Nerve growth factor eye drop administrated on the ocular surface of rodents affects the nucleus basalis and septum: biochemical and structural evidence. Brain Res. 2007;1127:45‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Lambiase A, Tirassa P, Micera A, Aloe L, Bonini S. Pharmacokinetics of conjunctivally applied nerve growth factor in the retina and optic nerve of adult rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3800‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Walker LC, Jucker M. The Exceptional Vulnerability of Humans to Alzheimer's Disease. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23:534‐45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Arnold SE, Lee EB, Moberg PJ, et al. Olfactory epithelium amyloid‐beta and paired helical filament‐tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:462‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Beckman D, Ott S, Donis‐Cox K, et al. Oligomeric Abeta in the monkey brain impacts synaptic integrity and induces accelerated cortical aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:26239‐46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Edler MK, Sherwood CC, Meindl RS, et al. Aged chimpanzees exhibit pathologic hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;59:107‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Latimer CS, Shively CA, Keene CD, et al. A nonhuman primate model of early Alzheimer's disease pathologic change: Implications for disease pathogenesis. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:93‐105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Haverkamp S, Reinhard K, Peichl L, Mietsch M. No evidence for age‐related alterations in the marmoset retina. Front Neuroanat. 2022;16:945295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Kim CB, Tom BW, Spear PD. Effects of aging on the densities, numbers, and sizes of retinal ganglion cells in rhesus monkey. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17:431‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Egan KJ, Vesterinen HM, Beglopoulos V, Sena ES, Macleod MR. From a mouse: systematic analysis reveals limitations of experiments testing interventions in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. Evid Based Preclin Med. 2016;3:e00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Vitek MP, Araujo JA, Fossel M, et al. Translational animal models for Alzheimer's disease: An Alzheimer's Association Business Consortium Think Tank. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020;6:e12114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Tai LM, Maldonado Weng J, LaDu MJ, Brady ST. Relevance of transgenic mouse models for Alzheimer's disease. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2021;177:1‐48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Zakzanis KK, Graham SJ, Campbell Z. A meta‐analysis of structural and functional brain imaging in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a neuroimaging profile. Neuropsychol Rev. 2003;13:1‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Raji CA, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Carmichael OT, Becker JT. Age, Alzheimer disease, and brain structure. Neurology. 2009;73:1899‐905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Dickerson BC, Wolk DA, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I . MRI cortical thickness biomarker predicts AD‐like CSF and cognitive decline in normal adults. Neurology. 2012;78:84‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Dickerson BC, Bakkour A, Salat DH, et al. The cortical signature of Alzheimer's disease: regionally specific cortical thinning relates to symptom severity in very mild to mild AD dementia and is detectable in asymptomatic amyloid‐positive individuals. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:497‐510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Frisoni GB, Fox NC, Jack CR, Jr. , Scheltens P, Thompson PM. The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:67‐77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Zeineh MM, Palomero‐Gallagher N, Axer M, et al. Direct Visualization and Mapping of the Spatial Course of Fiber Tracts at Microscopic Resolution in the Human Hippocampus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1779‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Park HY, Suh CH, Heo H, Shim WH, Kim SJ. Diagnostic performance of hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment: a meta‐analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:6979‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Lombardi G, Crescioli G, Cavedo E, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3:CD009628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Goubran M, Ntiri EE, Akhavein H, et al. Hippocampal segmentation for brains with extensive atrophy using three‐dimensional convolutional neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41:291‐308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Katabathula S, Wang Q, Xu R. Predict Alzheimer's disease using hippocampus MRI data: a lightweight 3D deep convolutional network model with visual and global shape representations. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Kilimann I, Grothe M, Heinsen H, et al. Subregional basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40:687‐700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Teipel SJ, Cavedo E, Hampel H, Grothe MJ, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I , Alzheimer Precision Medicine I . Basal Forebrain Volume, but Not Hippocampal Volume, Is a Predictor of Global Cognitive Decline in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Treated With Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Front Neurol. 2018;9:642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Butler T, Harvey P, Deshpande A, et al. Basal forebrain septal nuclei are enlarged in healthy subjects prior to the development of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;65:201‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Lorenzi RM, Palesi F, Castellazzi G, et al. Unsuspected Involvement of Spinal Cord in Alzheimer Disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Perone CS, Calabrese E, Cohen‐Adad J. Spinal cord gray matter segmentation using deep dilated convolutions. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Prados F, Ashburner J, Blaiotta C, et al. Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge. Neuroimage. 2017;152:312‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Mojiri Forooshani P, Biparva M, Ntiri EE, et al. Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022;43:2089‐108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Black S, Gao F, Bilbao J. Understanding white matter disease: imaging‐pathological correlations in vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2009;40:S48‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Roseborough A, Ramirez J, Black SE, Edwards JD. Associations between amyloid beta and white matter hyperintensities: A systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:1154‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Keith J, Gao FQ, Noor R, et al. Collagenosis of the Deep Medullary Veins: An Underrecognized Pathologic Correlate of White Matter Hyperintensities and Periventricular Infarction? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76:299‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Lahna D, Schwartz DL, Woltjer R, et al. Venous Collagenosis as Pathogenesis of White Matter Hyperintensity. Ann Neurol. 2022;92:992‐1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Mesulam M, Siddique T, Cohen B. Cholinergic denervation in a pure multi‐infarct state: observations on CADASIL. Neurology. 2003;60:1183‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Swartz RH, Sahlas DJ, Black SE. Strategic involvement of cholinergic pathways and executive dysfunction: Does location of white matter signal hyperintensities matter? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12:29‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Nemy M, Cedres N, Grothe MJ, et al. Cholinergic white matter pathways make a stronger contribution to attention and memory in normal aging than cerebrovascular health and nucleus basalis of Meynert. Neuroimage. 2020;211:116607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. McNeely AA, Ramirez J, Nestor SM, et al. Cholinergic subcortical hyperintensities in Alzheimer's disease patients from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study: relationships with cognitive dysfunction and hippocampal atrophy. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:785‐96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Gao FQ, Pettersen JA, Bocti C, Nestor SM, Kiss A, Black SE. Is encroachment of the carotid termination into the substantia innominata associated with its atrophy and cognition in Alzheimer's disease? Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1807‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Wen W, Sachdev P. The topography of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI in healthy 60‐ to 64‐year‐old individuals. Neuroimage. 2004;22:144‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Smith EE, O'Donnell M, Dagenais G, et al. Early cerebral small vessel disease and brain volume, cognition, and gait. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:251‐61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Shi Z, Cao X, Hu J, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is associated with hippocampus and lingual gyrus volumes in nondemented older adults. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020;99:109824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Sperling RA, Jack CR, Jr. , Black SE, et al. Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities in amyloid‐modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:367‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Filippi M, Cecchetti G, Spinelli EG, Vezzulli P, Falini A, Agosta F. Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities and beta‐Amyloid‐Targeting Antibodies: A Systematic Review. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:291‐304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Doran SJ, Sawyer RP. Risk factors in developing amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and clinical implications. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1326784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Constant AB, Basavaraju R, France J, et al. Longitudinal Patterns of Cortical Atrophy on MRI in Patients With Alzheimer Disease With and Without Lewy Body Pathology. Neurology. 2022;99:e1843–e52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Dalton MA, D'Souza A, Lv J, Calamante F. New insights into anatomical connectivity along the anterior‐posterior axis of the human hippocampus using in vivo quantitative fibre tracking. Elife. 2022;11:e76143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Fotiadis P, Reijmer YD, Van Veluw SJ, et al. White matter atrophy in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology. 2020;95:e554–e62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Nishioka C, Poh C, Sun SW. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals visual pathway damage in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45:97‐107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Bokde AL, Lopez‐Bayo P, Born C, et al. Alzheimer disease: functional abnormalities in the dorsal visual pathway. Radiology. 2010;254:219‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Therriault J, Pascoal TA, Lussier FZ, et al. Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer's disease using PET‐based Braak staging. Nat Aging. 2022;2:526‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Grothe MJ, Barthel H, Sepulcre J, et al. In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition. Neurology. 2017;89:2031‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Teipel SJ, Dyrba M, Chiesa PA, et al. In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition predicts functional conversion in the preclinical and prodromal phases of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;93:98‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, et al. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2015;313:1924‐38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Ottoy J, Niemantsverdriet E, Verhaeghe J, et al. Association of short‐term cognitive decline and MCI‐to‐AD dementia conversion with CSF, MRI, amyloid‐ and (18)F‐FDG‐PET imaging. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Smailagic N, Vacante M, Hyde C, Martin S, Ukoumunne O, Sachpekidis C. (1)(8)F‐FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Dubois B, Villain N, Frisoni GB, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:484‐96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Wilkins CH, Windon CC, Dilworth‐Anderson P, et al. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Amyloid PET Positivity in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Secondary Analysis of the Imaging Dementia‐Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:1139‐47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. JAMA. 2019;321:1286‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Rabinovici GD, La Joie R. Amyloid‐Targeting Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer Disease. JAMA. 2023;330:507‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Oosthoek M, Vermunt L, de Wilde A, et al. Utilization of fluid‐based biomarkers as endpoints in disease‐modifying clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024;16:93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Ma Y, Brettschneider J, Collingwood JF. A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid and Tau Levels Identifies Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Progressing to Alzheimer's Disease. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Ashton NJ, Brum WS, Di Molfetta G, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 Immunoassay for Alzheimer Disease Pathology. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81:255‐63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Jang H, Shin D, Yoo H, et al. Differential roles of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in stepwise biomarker‐guided diagnostics. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21:e14526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Doecke JD, Bellomo G, Vermunt L, et al. Diagnostic performance of plasma Abeta42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL along the continuum of Alzheimer's disease and non‐AD dementias: An international multi‐center study. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21:e14573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Manjavong M, Kang JM, Diaz A, et al. Performance of Plasma Biomarkers Combined with Structural MRI to Identify Candidate Participants for Alzheimer's Disease‐Modifying Therapy. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11:1198‐205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Udeh‐Momoh C, Zheng B, Sandebring‐Matton A, et al. Blood Derived Amyloid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9:12‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Janelidze S, Teunissen CE, Zetterberg H, et al. Head‐to‐Head Comparison of 8 Plasma Amyloid‐beta 42/40 Assays in Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:1375‐82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Ahmad S, Imtiaz MA, Mishra A, et al. Genome‐wide association study meta‐analysis of neurofilament light (NfL) levels in blood reveals novel loci related to neurodegeneration. Commun Biol. 2024;7:1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Li J, Yang M, Wei R, Cao Y, Fan X, Zhang S. The Predictive Ability of Blood Neurofilament Light Chain in Predicting Cognitive Decline in the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97:1589‐620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V, et al. High‐precision plasma beta‐amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology. 2019;93:e1647–e59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Quiroz YT, et al. Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho‐tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders. JAMA. 2020;324:772‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Mattsson‐Carlgren N, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, et al. Longitudinal plasma p‐tau217 is increased in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2020;143:3234‐41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Zetterberg H, Burnham SC. Blood‐based molecular biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Brain. 2019;12:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Ritchie C, Smailagic N, Noel‐Storr AH, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD008782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Heo G, Xu Y, Wang E, et al. Large‐scale plasma proteomic profiling unveils diagnostic biomarkers and pathways for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Aging. 2025;5:1114‐31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Mitolo M, Lombardi G, Manca R, Nacmias B, Venneri A. Association between blood‐based protein biomarkers and brain MRI in the Alzheimer's disease continuum: a systematic review. Journal of Neurology. 2024;271:7120‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Alamouti B, Funk J. Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:899‐901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Subhi Y, Forshaw T, Sorensen TL. Macular thickness and volume in the elderly: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;29:42‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Lamin A, Jarrar Z, Williams KM, et al. Segmented Macular Layer Volumes from Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in 184 Adult Twins: Associations With Age and Heritability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Ford KJ, Feller MB. Assembly and disassembly of a retinal cholinergic network. Vis Neurosci. 2012;29:61‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Coppola G, Di Renzo A, Ziccardi L, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta‐Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Thomson KL, Yeo JM, Waddell B, Cameron JR, Pal S. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer change in dementia, using optical coherence tomography. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015;1:136‐43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Wang M, Zhu Y, Shi Z, Li C, Shen Y. Meta‐analysis of the relationship of peripheral retinal nerve fiber layer thickness to Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27:263‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Mejia‐Vergara AJ, Restrepo‐Jimenez P, Pelak VS. Optical Coherence Tomography in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:578698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Noah AM, Almghairbi D, Moppett IK. Optical coherence tomography in mild cognitive impairment ‐ Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;196:106036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Knoll B, Simonett J, Volpe NJ, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Case‐control study and meta‐analysis. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016;4:85‐93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. van de Kreeke JA, Nguyen HT, den Haan J, et al. Retinal layer thickness in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97:798‐804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. van de Kreeke JA, Nguyen HT, Konijnenberg E, et al. Longitudinal retinal layer changes in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99:538‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Snyder PJ, Johnson LN, Lim YY, et al. Nonvascular retinal imaging markers of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016;4:169‐78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Lad EM, Mukherjee D, Stinnett SS, et al. Evaluation of inner retinal layers as biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment to moderate Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Janez‐Escalada L, Janez‐Garcia L, Salobrar‐Garcia E, et al. Spatial analysis of thickness changes in ten retinal layers of Alzheimer's disease patients based on optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Stevenson‐Hoare J, Heslegrave A, Leonenko G, et al. Plasma biomarkers and genetics in the diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2023;146:690‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Cullen N, et al. Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho‐tau combined with other accessible measures. Nat Med. 2021;27:1034‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Meklin J, SyrjAnen K, Eskelinen M. Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Traditional and New‐generation Fecal Immunochemical Tests. Anticancer Res. 2020;40:3591‐604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Tadesse GF, Tegaw EM, Abdisa EK. Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Ultrasound. 2023;26:355‐67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Reche J, Stocker AB, Henchoz V, et al. High‐Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy Individuals Provides Resolution at the Cellular and Subcellular Levels. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Pircher M, Zawadzki RJ. Review of adaptive optics OCT (AO‐OCT): principles and applications for retinal imaging [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8:2536‐62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Britten‐Jones AC, Thai L, Flanagan JPM, et al. Adaptive optics imaging in inherited retinal diseases: A scoping review of the clinical literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2024;69:51‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Bille JF. High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics: Springer International Publishing; 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Lee B, Jeong S, Lee J, et al. Wide‐field computational cellular‐resolution imaging of the human retina using multi‐MHz phase‐stable SS‐OCT. SPIE Conference Proceedings. 2023;12632:1263203‐8. [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Ge X, Chen S, Chen S, Liu L. High Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2021;39:3824‐35. [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Hampson KM, Turcotte R, Miller DT, et al. Adaptive optics for high‐resolution imaging. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Drexler W, Fujimoto JG. Springer reference: Optical Coherence Tomography. 2nd 2015. ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Biffi E, Turple Z, Chung J, Biffi A. Retinal biomarkers of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0266974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Geerling CF, Terheyden JH, Langner SM, et al. Changes of the retinal and choroidal vasculature in cerebral small vessel disease. Sci Rep. 2022;12:3660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Ashimatey BS, D'Orazio LM, Ma SJ, et al. Lower retinal capillary density in minimal cognitive impairment among older Latinx adults. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12:e12071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Hui J, Zhao Y, Yu S, Liu J, Chiu K, Wang Y. Detection of retinal changes with optical coherence tomography angiography in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients: A meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0255362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Yeh TC, Kuo CT, Chou YB. Retinal Microvascular Changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta‐Analysis, and Meta‐Regression. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:860759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Teo ZL, Sun CZ, Chong CCY, et al. Normative Data and Associations of OCT Angiography Measurements of the Macula: The Singapore Malay Eye Study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022;6:1080‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. You QS, Chan JCH, Ng ALK, et al. Macular Vessel Density Measured With Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Its Associations in a Large Population‐Based Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:4830‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Mukkamala L, Nguyen M, Chang M, Park SS. Repeatability of Vascular Density Measurement of the Three Retinal Plexus Layers Using OCT Angiography in Pathologic Eyes (OCTA Vascular Density Repeatability of Three Plexus Layers). Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:93‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Xie J, Yi Q, Wu Y, et al. Deep segmentation of OCTA for evaluation and association of changes of retinal microvasculature with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024;108:432‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Yoon SP, Grewal DS, Thompson AC, et al. Retinal Microvascular and Neurodegenerative Changes in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Compared with Control Participants. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3:489‐99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Chiara C, Gilda C, Daniela M, et al. A two‐year longitudinal study of retinal vascular impairment in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:993621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Szegedi S, Dal‐Bianco P, Stogmann E, et al. Anatomical and functional changes in the retina in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:e914–e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Querques G, Borrelli E, Sacconi R, et al. Functional and morphological changes of the retinal vessels in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Sci Rep. 2019;9:63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Cipolla JA, Jiang H, Simms AY, Baumel B, Rundek T, Wang J. Impaired Retinal Capillary Function in Patients With Alzheimer Disease. J Neuroophthalmol. 2024;44:30‐4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Di Pippo M, Cipollini V, Giubilei F, Scuderi G, Abdolrahimzadeh S. Retinal and Choriocapillaris Vascular Changes in Early Alzheimer Disease Patients Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2024;44:184‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Mio M, Kennedy KG, Dimick M, et al. Neurostructural correlates of retinal microvascular caliber in adolescent bipolar disorder. JCPP Adv. 2021;1:e12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Heringa SM, Bouvy WH, van den Berg E, Moll AC, Kappelle LJ, Biessels GJ. Associations between retinal microvascular changes and dementia, cognitive functioning, and brain imaging abnormalities: a systematic review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:983‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. Dumitrascu OM, Demaerschalk BM, Valencia Sanchez C, et al. Retinal Microvascular Abnormalities as Surrogate Markers of Cerebrovascular Ischemic Disease: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2018;27:1960‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Asanad S, Felix CM, Fantini M, Harrington MG, Sadun AA, Karanjia R. Retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: an electrophysiologic biomarker signature. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Byun MS, Park SW, Lee JH, et al. Association of Retinal Changes With Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Cognitively Normal Individuals. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:548‐56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Marmoy OR, Viswanathan S. Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells. Eye (Lond). 2021;35:2386‐405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. O'Brien JL, O'Keefe KM, LaViolette PS, et al. Longitudinal fMRI in elderly reveals loss of hippocampal activation with clinical decline. Neurology. 2010;74:1969‐76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Ma G, Kim TH, Son T, et al. Intrinsic signal optoretinography revealing AD‐induced retinal photoreceptor hyperexcitability before a detectable morphological abnormality. Opt Lett. 2023;48:5129‐32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Li R, Du Z, Qian X, Li Y, et al. High resolution optical coherence elastography of retina under prosthetic electrode. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11:918‐27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Qian X, Li R, Li Y, et al. In vivo evaluation of posterior eye elasticity using shaker‐based optical coherence elastography. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020;245:282‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Zhang W, Kaser‐Eichberger A, Fan W, Platzl C, Schrodl F, Heindl LM. The structure and function of the human choroid. Ann Anat. 2024;254:152239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Feng Y, Murphy MC, Hojo E, Li F, Roberts N. Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Study of Neurodegenerative Diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;59:82‐96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Campbell MCW, Mason EL, Emptage L, et al. Analysis of amyloid deposits in the retina and implications for use as a biomarker of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2023;19:e066873. [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Tang MY, Blazes MS, Lee CS. Imaging Amyloid and Tau in the Retina: Current Research and Future Directions. J Neuroophthalmol. 2023;43:168‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. den Haan J, Hart de Ruyter FJ, Lochocki B, et al. No difference in retinal fluorescence after oral curcumin intake in amyloid‐proven AD cases compared to controls. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022;14:e12347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Sadda SR, Borrelli E, Fan W, et al. A pilot study of fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Eye (Lond). 2019;33:1271‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279. Sauer L, Vitale AS, Milliken CM, Modersitzki NK, Blount JD, Bernstein PS. Autofluorescence Lifetimes Measured with Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) Are Affected by Age, but Not by Pigmentation or Gender. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280. Elbert DL, Patterson BW, Lucey BP, Benzinger TLS, Bateman RJ. Importance of CSF‐based Abeta clearance with age in humans increases with declining efficacy of blood‐brain barrier/proteolytic pathways. Commun Biol. 2022;5:98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281. Oba R, Ujike N, Ono Y, Okano T, Murakami T. Label‐free autofluorescence and hyperspectral imaging of cerebral amyloid‐beta lesions in aged squirrel monkeys. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2024;36:41‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282. Hadoux X, Hui F, Lim JKH, et al. Non‐invasive in vivo hyperspectral imaging of the retina for potential biomarker use in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283. Lemmens S, Van Eijgen J, Van Keer K, et al. Hyperspectral Imaging and the Retina: Worth the Wave? Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284. Sharafi SM, Sylvestre JP, Chevrefils C, et al. Vascular retinal biomarkers improves the detection of the likely cerebral amyloid status from hyperspectral retinal images. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019;5:610‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285. Du X, Koronyo Y, Mirzaei N, et al. Label‐free hyperspectral imaging and deep‐learning prediction of retinal amyloid beta‐protein and phosphorylated tau. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1:pgac164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286. Koronyo Y, Biggs D, Barron E, et al. Retinal amyloid pathology and proof‐of‐concept imaging trial in Alzheimer's disease. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e93621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287. Tadokoro K, Yamashita T, Kimura S, et al. Retinal Amyloid Imaging for Screening Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83:927‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288. Dumitrascu OM, Lyden PD, Torbati T, et al. Sectoral segmentation of retinal amyloid imaging in subjects with cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12:e12109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289. Ngolab J, Donohue M, Belsha A, et al. Feasibility study for detection of retinal amyloid in clinical trials: The Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) trial. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13:e12199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290. Golzan SM, Goozee K, Georgevsky D, et al. Retinal vascular and structural changes are associated with amyloid burden in the elderly: ophthalmic biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291. Wu SZ, Masurkar AV, Balcer LJ. Afferent and Efferent Visual Markers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review and Update in Early Stage Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:572337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292. McEvoy LK, Holland D, Hagler DJ, Jr , et al. Mild cognitive impairment: baseline and longitudinal structural MR imaging measures improve predictive prognosis. Radiology. 2011;259:834‐43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293. Mendez‐Gomez JL, Pelletier A, Rougier MB, et al. Association of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness With Brain Alterations in the Visual and Limbic Networks in Elderly Adults Without Dementia. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e184406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294. Casaletto KB, Ward ME, Baker NS, et al. Retinal thinning is uniquely associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy in neurologically normal older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;51:141‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295. Ong YT, Hilal S, Cheung CY, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration on optical coherence tomography and cerebral atrophy. Neurosci Lett. 2015;584:12‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296. den Haan J, Janssen SF, van de Kreeke JA, Scheltens P, Verbraak FD, Bouwman FH. Retinal thickness correlates with parietal cortical atrophy in early‐onset Alzheimer's disease and controls. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018;10:49‐55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297. den Haan J, van de Kreeke JA, Konijnenberg E, et al. Retinal thickness as a potential biomarker in patients with amyloid‐proven early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019;11:463‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298. Mejia‐Vergara AJ, Karanjia R, Sadun AA. OCT parameters of the optic nerve head and the retina as surrogate markers of brain volume in a normal population, a pilot study. J Neurol Sci. 2021;420:117213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299. Barrett‐Young A, Abraham WC, Cheung CY, et al. Associations Between Thinner Retinal Neuronal Layers and Suboptimal Brain Structural Integrity in a Middle‐Aged Cohort. Eye Brain. 2023;15:25‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300. Berlucchi G. Visual interhemispheric communication and callosal connections of the occipital lobes. Cortex. 2014;56:1‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301. Bocci T, Pietrasanta M, Cerri C, Restani L, Caleo M, Sartucci F. Visual callosal connections: role in visual processing in health and disease. Rev Neurosci. 2014;25:113‐27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302. Bocti C, Swartz RH, Gao FQ, Sahlas DJ, Behl P, Black SE. A new visual rating scale to assess strategic white matter hyperintensities within cholinergic pathways in dementia. Stroke. 2005;36:2126‐31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303. Nolze‐Charron G, Dufort‐Rouleau R, Houde JC, et al. Tractography of the external capsule and cognition: A diffusion MRI study of cholinergic fibers. Exp Gerontol. 2020;130:110792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304. Garcia‐Sanchez A, Sotolongo‐Grau O, Tartari JP, et al. Macular vessel density in the superficial plexus is not a proxy of cerebrovascular damage in non‐demented individuals: data from the NORFACE cohort. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024;16:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305. Westman E, Simmons A, Zhang Y, et al. Multivariate analysis of MRI data for Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. Neuroimage. 2011;54:1178‐87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306. Carazo‐Barrios L, Cabrera‐Maestre A, Alba‐Linero C, et al. Retinal Neurodegeneration Measured With Optical Coherence Tomography and Neuroimaging in Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review. J Neuroophthalmol. 2023;43:116‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307. Alber J, Goldfarb D, Thompson LI, et al. Developing retinal biomarkers for the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease: What we know, what we don't, and how to move forward. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:229‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308. Nieminen P. Application of Standardized Regression Coefficient in Meta‐Analysis. BioMedInformatics. 2022;2:434‐58. [Google Scholar]
  • 309. Soleimani‐Meigooni DN, Iaccarino L, La Joie R, et al. 18F‐flortaucipir PET to autopsy comparisons in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. Brain. 2020;143:3477‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310. Black SE. BEAM: Brain‐Eye Amyloid Memory Study (BEAM). Updated Oct 25, 2022 ed. ClinicalTrials.gov: U.S. National Institutes of Health; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 311. Besirli CG. Multimodal Ocular Imaging in Neurodegeneration. Updated Mar 28, 2022. ed2018.
  • 312. Cognat E. Finding Retinal Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease (FIREBALZ). Updated Oct 12, 2022. ed2021.
  • 313. Stalmans I. Multimodal Retinal Imaging in the Detection and Follow‐up of Alzheimer's Disease (RetAD). Updated Mar 15, 2018. ed2021.
  • 314. Alber J. Atlas of Retinal Imaging in Alzheimer's Study (ARIAS). Updated Oct 20, 2020 ed. ClinicalTrials.gov: U.S. National Institutes of Health; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 315. Javitt DC, Martinez A, Sehatpour P, et al. Disruption of early visual processing in amyloid‐positive healthy individuals and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023;15:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences: Taylor & Francis; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 317. Lopez‐de‐Eguileta A, Lopez‐Garcia S, Lage C, et al. The retinal ganglion cell layer reflects neurodegenerative changes in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318. Julian PT Higgins JPT, Li T, Deeks JJ. Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 62 (updated February 2021) Cochrane, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 319. Wang X, Jiao B, Liu H, et al. Machine learning based on Optical Coherence Tomography images as a diagnostic tool for Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022;28:2206‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320. Jali V, Zhang Q, Chong JR, et al. Diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: blood plasma and optical coherence tomography. Brain Commun. 2025;7:fcae472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321. Ravichandran S, Snyder PJ, Alber J, et al. Association and multimodal model of retinal and blood‐based biomarkers for detection of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025;17:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322. Ashraf G, McGuinness M, Khan MA, Obtinalla C, Hadoux X, van Wijngaarden P. Retinal imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies using brain amyloid beta status for case definition. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023;15:e12421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323. Ismail Z, Black SE, Camicioli R, et al. Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:1182‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:270‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326. Dachet F, Brown JB, Valyi‐Nagy T, et al. Selective time‐dependent changes in activity and cell‐specific gene expression in human postmortem brain. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327. De‐Giorgio F, Grassi S, d'Aloja E, Pascali VL. Post‐mortem ocular changes and time since death: Scoping review and future perspective. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021;50:101862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328. Nioi M, Napoli PE, Demontis R, Locci E, Fossarello M, d'Aloja E. Postmortem Ocular Findings in the Optical Coherence Tomography Era: A Proof of Concept Study Based on Six Forensic Cases. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329. Grieve K, Thouvenin O, Sengupta A, Borderie VM, Paques M. Appearance of the Retina With Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:OCT96–OCT104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330. Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, et al. Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage. 2010;53:1244‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331. Hshieh TT, Fox ML, Kosar CM, et al. Head circumference as a useful surrogate for intracranial volume in older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28:157‐62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332. Larsen JS. Axial length of the emmetropic eye and its relation to the head size. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1979;57:76‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333. Salmon AE, Sajdak BS, Atry F, Carroll J. Axial Scaling Is Independent of Ocular Magnification in OCT Images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:3037‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334. Wiseman SJ, Tatham AJ, Meijboom R, et al. Measuring axial length of the eye from magnetic resonance brain imaging. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335. Brydges CR. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology. Innov Aging. 2019;3:igz036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336. Selya AS, Rose JS, Dierker LC, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED. Front Psychol. 2012;3:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988. p. 410‐414, 73‐81. [Google Scholar]
  • 338. Chin WW. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern Methods for Business Research (ebook). Mahwah, New Jersey: Psychology Press; 1998. p. 243, 316‐317. [Google Scholar]
  • 339. Greenwell BM, Boehmke BC. Variable Importance Plots—An Introduction to the vip Package. R J. 2020;12:343‐66. [Google Scholar]
  • 340. Eriksson L, Byrne T, Johansson E, Trygg J, Vikström C. Multi‐ and Megavariate Data Analysis Basic Principles and Applications: Umetrics Academy; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 341. Santangelo R, Huang SC, Bernasconi MP, et al. Neuro‐Retina Might Reflect Alzheimer's Disease Stage. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77:1455‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342. Hong J, Tan B, Quang ND, et al. Intra‐session repeatability of quantitative metrics using widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in elderly subjects. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2020;98:e570–e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343. Manalastas PIC, Zangwill LM, Saunders LJ, et al. Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:851‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344. Hou H, Durbin MK, El‐Nimri N, Fischer JL, Sadda SR. Agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of quantitative retinal layer assessment using swept‐source and spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography in eyes with retinal diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1281751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345. Krebs I, Hagen S, Brannath W, et al. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements by Optical Coherence Tomography in Age‐Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1577‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346. Wan H, Wu Z, Liu Z, Qin B. Comparison of macular retinal thickness measurements using spectral‐domain and swept‐source optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025;12:2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347. Fang D, Tang FY, Huang H, Cheung CY, Chen H. Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept‐source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:415‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348. Zhou B, Rayner AW, Gregg EW, et al. Worldwide trends in diabetes prevalence and treatment from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 1108 population‐representative studies with 141 million participants. The Lancet. 2024;404:2077‐93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349. Kapetanakis VV, Chan MP, Foster PJ, Cook DG, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:86‐93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350. Farhan SM, Bartha R, Black SE, et al. The Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI). Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44:196‐202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351. Sunderland KM, Beaton D, Arnott SR, et al. Characteristics of the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative cohort. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19:226‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352. Mutlu U, Colijn JM, Ikram MA, et al. Association of Retinal Neurodegeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography With Dementia: A Population‐Based Study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1256‐63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353. Foster PJ, Atan D, Khawaja A, et al. Cohort profile: rationale and methods of UK Biobank repeat imaging study eye measures to study dementia. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e069258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354. Muller PL, Kihara Y, Olvera‐Barrios A, et al. Quantification and Predictors of OCT‐Based Macular Curvature and Dome‐Shaped Configuration: Results From the UK Biobank. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355. Kashani AH, Berendschot T, Bonnin S, et al. Retinal optical coherence tomography angiography imaging in population studies for study of microvascular dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21:e70252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356. Bahr T, Vu TA, Tuttle JJ, Iezzi R. Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms for Retinal Image Analysis in Neurodegenerative Disease: Systematic Review of Datasets and Models. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024;13:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357. Ettehad M, Abdollahi M, Jafarizadeh A, Attar Gharamaleki T, Niyousha M. Evaluating macular and optic nerve changes during Ramadan fasting by optical coherence tomography angiography‐a prospective before‐and‐after study. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43:4271‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358. Balk LJ, Oberwahrenbrock T, Uitdehaag BM, Petzold A. Physiological variation of retinal layer thickness is not caused by hydration: a randomised trial. J Neurol Sci. 2014;344:88‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359. Balk LJ, Sonder JM, Strijbis EM, et al. The physiological variation of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume in humans as assessed by spectral domain‐optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1251‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360. Holland CM, Smith EE, Csapo I, et al. Spatial distribution of white‐matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and healthy aging. Stroke. 2008;39:1127‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361. Makedonov I, Black SE, MacIntosh BJ. Cerebral small vessel disease in aging and Alzheimer's disease: a comparative study using MRI and SPECT. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:243‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362. Liu AK, Chang RC, Pearce RK, Gentleman SM. Nucleus basalis of Meynert revisited: anatomy, history and differential involvement in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:527‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363. Boron WF, Boulpaep EL. The Nervous System. Medical Physiology E‐Book. Saintt Louis, United States: Elsevier; 2016. p. 313‐4. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

ALZ-21-e70884-s002.pdf (496.7KB, pdf)

Supporting Information

ALZ-21-e70884-s001.docx (181.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and in references cited by the paper.


Articles from Alzheimer's & Dementia are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES