Abstract
An aerobic methanotroph was isolated from a biofilm of coal mine Gruve 7 (Svalbard) and designated strain G7T. Cells of strain G7T were Gram-stain-negative, pink-pigmented and motile rods. Strain G7T could grow at pH 6.8 and at temperatures ranging from 4 to 21 °C. The genome size was 4.00 Mb with a (digital) DNA G+C content of 47.7 mol%. Strain G7T represents a member of the family Methylomonadaceae of the class Gammaproteobacteria. It displayed 94.6–99.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the type strains of the genus Methylobacter. Whole-genome comparisons based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) confirmed that strain G7T represents a novel species. It showed 16S rRNA gene identity of 99.7%, 91.8% ANI and 46% dDDH to the closest type strain, Methylobacter svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, with ANI and dDDH being much lower than the typically used 95 and 70% cutoffs, respectively, to delineate different species. For methane activation, strain G7T carries genes encoding particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoCAB). Also, genes of the methane utilization pathways, i.e. oxidation of methane to carbon dioxide and assimilation of methane-carbon to biomass, were encoded in the genome. Strikingly, compared to all other Methylobacter spp. strains, strain G7T did not have nitrogenase genes for nitrogen fixation. Strain G7T also possessed genes for ectoine production, which was not observed in the genomes of its closest relatives. Based on phenotypic, genetic and phylogenetic data, strain G7T represents a novel species within the genus Methylobacter for which the name Methylobacter arcticus sp. nov. is proposed, with strain G7T (DSM: 117899; LMG: 33632) as the type strain.
Keywords: Arctic, coal mine, methane oxidation, methanotroph, Methylobacter, psychrotrophic
Introduction
Methylobacter is a genus of methane-oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs). It belongs to the family Methylomonadaceae of the class Gammaproteobacteria in the phylum Pseudomonadota. Methylobacter species are ubiquitous in nature, acting as biofilters for methane in diverse natural aquatic and terrestrial environments, as well as in anthropogenic ecosystems [1,2]. They have been enriched and isolated from natural ecosystems such as tundra soil, wetland soil, freshwater and estuary sediments, as well as from lake water and anthropogenic methane-emitting ecosystems, such as landfills and rice fields (Table 1). The current type species include Methylobacter whittenburyi 1521T, Methylobacter marinus A45T, Methylobacter luteus NCIMB 11914T, Methylobacter psychrophilus Z-0021T, Methylobacter tundripaludum SV96T and Methylobacter svalbardensis LS7-T4AT which have been isolated from wetlands, sediments, mud and soils (Table 1). The type species represent different cell morphologies, i.e. cocci and rods, and temperature preferences, i.e. mesophilic, psychrotolerant and psychrophilic species.
Table 1. Similarity of the 16S rRNA gene (% similarity), pmoA gene [% similarity at nucleotide level (amino acid level)] and genome, i.e. average nucleotide and amino acid identity (ANI and AAI in %) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH in %), of strain G7T with those of reference strains (isolation/enrichment source and database accession numbers also shown).
| Strain G7T compared to | Source | 16S rRNA gene acc. | Genome acc. | 16S rRNA gene | pmoA gene | ANI | AAI | dDDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. psychrophilus FCN1 | Tailings pond water | OK135604.1 | No data | 99.6 | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Methylobacter sp. NLS-2M | Landfill soil | OM535268.1 | No data | 99.6 | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Ca. Methylobacter titanis K-2018 | Antarctic lake sediment | From genome | GCA_029945785.1 | 99.6 | 97.45 (98.79) | 95.7 | 94.3 | 63.6 |
| Ca. Methylobacter titanis D1-2020 | Antarctic lake sediment | From genome | GCA_029946125.1 | 99.6 | 97.45 (98.79) | 95.7 | 94.7 | 63.9 |
| M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT | Arctic Lagoon Pingo sediments | OQ832782.1 | GCA_037671525.1 | 99.7 | 99.19 (100) | 91.8 | 89.0 | 46 |
| M. tundripaludum SV96T | Arctic wetland soil | NR_042107.1 | GCA_000190755.3 | 98.7 | 94.35 (97.57) | 85.3 | 82.4 | 30.5 |
| M. tundripaludum OWC-DMM | Wetland | From genome | GCA_002934385.1 | 98.7 | 94.35 (97.57) | 85.2 | 82.6 | 30.2 |
| M. tundripaludum 21/22 | Lake sediment | From genome | GCA_000685925.1 | 98.5 | 94.62 (97.98) | 85.2 | 82.5 | 30.5 |
| M. tundripaludum 31/32 | Lake sediment | From genome | GCA_000733835.1 | 98.5 | 93.55 (97.98) | 85.2 | 82 | 30.4 |
| Ca. Methylobacter oryzae KRF1 | Tropical rice field | MK511847.1 | GCA_003994235.2 | 97.4 | 90.46 (93.93) | 80.8 | 78.3 | 24.1 |
| Methylobacter sp. S3L5C | Boreal lake water | OM479427.1 | GCA_022788635.1 | 98.7 | 90.95 (93.9) | 79.0 | 72.0 | 22.4 |
| M. psychrophilus Z-0021T | Arctic tundra soil | NR_025016.1 | GCA_025583945.1 | 98.7 | 89.25 (91.87) | 78.4 | 71.9 | 22 |
| M. luteus NCIMB 11914T | Fresh water mud | NR_041814.1 | GCA_000427625.1* | 96.2 | 87.25 (91.9) | 78.0 | 70.8 | 21.2 |
| M. marinus A45T | Sewage outfall sediment | NR_025132.1 | GCA_000383855.1 | 96.0 | 87.13 (92.71) | 77.5 | 70.1 | 20.5 |
| M. whittenburyi 1521T | Estuary sediment | NR_029242.1 | GCA_000746145.1† | 94.6 | 87.13 (92.71) | 77.4 | 70.2 | 20.5 |
| Ca. Methylobacter coli | Faeces (Indian antelope) | From genome | GCA_015476545.1 | 95.9 | 85.43 (91.09) | 77.3 | 70.3 | 20.6 |
| Ca. Methylobacter favarea B2 | Volcanic soil | No data | GCA_902806695.1 | no data | 82.58 (87.04) | 77.2 | 71.2 | 20.7 |
*Genome represents strain IMV-B-3098, as the genome of the type strain was not found.
†Genome represents strain BBA5.1, as the genome of the type strain was not found.
Coal mines and coal mining represent a significant anthropogenic methane source, accounting for 33% of total fossil fuel–related emissions of methane (for the 2008–2017 decade) [3]. Culture-independent studies have revealed methanotrophic activity and several methanotrophic bacterial genera (incl. Methylobacter) in rocks of coal mines [4,7], yet cultured representatives of coal mine methanotrophic bacteria are lacking. In our preliminary experiments, we noticed active CH4 consumption by coal samples from the coal mine Gruve 7 (Fig. S1, available in the online Supplementary Material). As a result, we enriched and isolated a methanotrophic bacterium, strain G7T, from the biofilm on the coal. In our previous study focusing on thermal acclimation of Methylobacter methanotrophs, strain G7T was studied for its temperature preferences and cellular fatty acids [8]. Here, we extend the characterization of G7T to include other phenotypic properties, as well as phylogenetic and genomic data. Based on the results of phenotypic, genetic and phylogenetic analyses, we propose that strain G7T represents a novel species within the genus Methylobacter.
Methods
Enrichment, isolation and cultivation
A greyish biofilm was sampled from a humid area on the wall, deep within the coal mine Gruve 7, on 3 August 2009. Gruve 7 is located at 78° 09′ 24″ N 16° 01′ 23″ E in Adventdalen nearby Longyearbyen, Svalbard. The air within the mine normally has a CH4 concentration of 0.1% and an ambient temperature of 10–11 °C (personal communication staff coal mine Gruve 7). The mine is set to close for the extraction of coal in summer 2025.
Pieces of coal containing biofilm were transported in a cooling bag to the laboratory. Samples of the biofilm were transferred to 120 ml serum bottles and re-suspended in 20 ml of 10× diluted nitrate mineral salts (NMS) medium (DSMZ medium 921, pH 6.8) in 120 ml serum bottles sealed with rubber septa and aluminium crimp caps. CH4 was added to the air in the bottle headspace to a final concentration of 20% (v/v) and incubated in the dark at 10 °C. When visible growth was observed, subsamples were transferred to new 120 ml serum bottles and plated on 1/10 NMS agar plates that were also incubated in containers with 20% CH4 (v/v) in air in the dark. Colonies from agar plates were used to inoculate new serum bottles. Transfer between liquid and solid culture was repeated several times. A small aliquot was also plated on nutrient-rich medium TYGA (5 g Tryptone/Peptone, 2.5 g Yeast extract, 1 g Glucose and 20 g Agar per 1 l Tap water) and incubated without CH4 to check for the presence of heterotrophic contaminants. The purity of the culture was confirmed when one cell type was observed under a light microscope, and growth was absent on TYGA. The pure culture was attained in 2012. The strain G7T was preserved as an active culture and cryopreserved in 7% DMSO. Storage via lyophilization has not been tested.
16S rRNA gene and genome analysis
The standard CTAB extraction protocol of the DOE Joint Genome Institute [9] was used for the genomic DNA (gDNA) isolation from cells of strain G7T that had been grown in liquid culture. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified from gDNA using primers 27F (AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT) and sequenced using primer pairs 785F (GGATTAGATACCCTGGTA) and 907R (CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT) by Sanger Sequencing at UiT, The Arctic University of Norway (Tromsö, Norway). A 16S rRNA gene-based alignment followed by a phylogenetic tree was constructed in Mega 11 using the maximum-likelihood algorithm (generalized time-reversible model) with 100 bootstraps [10].
The genome sequencing and assembly service was provided by the Norwegian Sequencing Centre (https://www.sequencing.uio.no/). DNA of strain G7T was fragmented to 10–15 kb fragments using g-tubes (Covaris). The library was prepared using the Pacific Biosciences protocol for HiFi library prep using SMRTbell® ExpressTemplate Prep Kit 3.0. Sequencing was done, following the Microbial Assembly – mode, on the part of 25M SMRT cell on Revio instrument using Revio Polymerase kit and sequencing plate. Circular consensus sequencing analysis for generation of HiFi reads was performed on the instrument (ICS SW v. 13.0.0.212033). Altogether, there were 8,639 HiFi reads with an average length of 8,003 bp. De novo assembly was done using IPA HiFi genome assembler (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbipa) including genome polishing using Racon [11].
Basic statistics of the strain G7T genome and reference genomes were calculated using Prokka (v. 1.14.6) [12]. The genomes were functionally annotated for the presence or absence of genes, functional traits and KEGG modules, using METABOLIC (v. 4.0) [13]. The general differences in the functional potential between Methylobacter spp. species were assessed via UPGMA cluster analysis of the presence–absence data of functional traits and KEGG modules encoded in the genomes. Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters were also identified and annotated using antiSMASH (v. 8.0.2) [14]. The genome of strain G7T and its closest cultured representative (Methylobacter svalbardensis LS7-T4AT) were also specifically annotated according to the KEGG system using KofamKOALA [15]. The pmoA genes encoding the beta subunit of particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) were extracted from genomes of G7T and reference genomes using Prokka (v. 1.14.6) [12]. They were then translated to amino acid sequences, which were aligned and subjected to phylogenetic tree analysis using the neighbour-joining method (Jones-Taylor-Thornton model) with 500 bootstrap replicates in Mega 11 [10]. The genome-wide phylogenetic tree was built from protein alignments produced in PhyloPhlAn (v. 3.0.67; PhyloPhlAn database including 400 universal marker genes; ‘-diversity low’ - argument) [16,17] using the maximum-likelihood algorithm (PROTCATLG − model) with 100 bootstrap replicates in RAxML (v. 8.2.12) [18]. Average nucleotide identities (ANI) with reference genomes were calculated using the ANI calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/, accessed on May 2024) [19]. Average amino acid identities were calculated using the AAI calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai/, accessed in May 2024) [20]. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) comparisons with reference genomes were done using the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) online service (https://tygs.dsmz.de/, accessed in May 2024) [21].
Morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomic characterization
Cell morphology and size of strain G7T were examined via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A gammaproteobacterial methanotroph membrane structure was confirmed by TEM. Analyses of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) of strain G7T were carried out by the Identification Service, Leibniz-Institut DSMZ – Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany, and the results were reported earlier [8]. The growth response and methane uptake response of strain G7T towards different temperatures (i.e. 4 °C, 8 °C, 15 °C, 21 °C and 27 °C) were also reported previously [8]. Here, we additionally report results on growth and methane uptake at 23 °C. Growth using methanol was determined by incubating G7T at different methanol concentrations (0, 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%) without CH4 for 36 days in conditions described above for growth with CH4. Similarly, G7T was incubated without nitrate in the medium. In addition, the growth of G7T was compared between NMS and ammonium mineral salts media. Salt tolerance was tested in 1/10 NMS medium (pH 6.8) with the addition of 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3% w/v NaCl, and pH optimum using a range from pH 4.5 to 10. No tests of growth on multi-C substrates were performed, as previous studies of Methylobacter did not indicate the utilization of such substrates [22,24].
Results and discussion
16S rRNA and pmoA gene analysis
Based on a comparison of 16S rRNA genes, strain G7T was most similar, with 99.7% similarity with the recently described psychrophilic strain M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, which was isolated from a terrestrial Arctic alkaline methane seep in Lagoon Pingo, in Central Spitsbergen (Table 1, Fig. 1a) [22]. Furthermore, strain G7T’s 16S rRNA gene had 99.6% similarity, with metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) of Ca. Methylobacter titanis, from a psychrophilic methanotrophic enrichment culture originating from freshwater lake sediments of Antarctica [25]. In addition, high similarity was identified with 16S rRNA genes of M. psychrophilus FCN1 and Methylobacter sp. NLS-2M, isolated from tailings pond water and temperate landfill cover soil, respectively, and for which genome sequences are not available (Table 1, Fig. 1a). The next closest strains, with 16S rRNA gene identity of 98.5–98.7%, were the psychrophilic Methylobacter sp. S3L5C and M. psychrophilus Z-0021T and the various strains of M. tundripaludum (Table 1, Fig. 1a) [23,24, 26,28]. In general, the 16S rRNA gene similarity of strain G7T with other Methylobacter spp. strains varied between 94.6 and 99.7% (Table 1, Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1. (a) Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA genes and (b) deduced amino acid sequences of pmoA genes, as well as (c) genome-wide phylogenomic tree (PhyloPhlAn). 16S rRNA gene and phylogenomic trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood algorithm, while the pmoA gene tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method, with the GTR model for the 16S rRNA gene tree (in a), the JTT model for the pmoA gene tree (in b) and the PROTCATLG model for the genome-wide tree (in c). Numbers at the nodes indicate the percentage of occurrence in 100 bootstrapped trees. The scale bars indicate the number of substitutions per nucleotide (in a) and amino acid position (in b and c). Strain G7T is highlighted in bold. The pmoA genes (in b) do not have accession numbers because they were extracted from genomes (see the accession numbers for genomes in c).
As with the 16S rRNA gene comparison, the pmoA gene of strain G7T was most similar, with 99.2 and 100% nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity, respectively, with M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT. It was less similar to the two MAGs representing Ca. M. titanis, with averagely 97.5 and 98.8% nucleotide and amino acid identity, and to M. tundripaludum strains, with 93.6–94.6% and 97.6–98.0% nucleotide and amino acid identity, respectively (Table 1, Fig. 1b). In contrast with 16S rRNA gene similarities, the similarity of the pmoA gene of G7T was distinct from those of Methylobacter sp. S3L5C, with 91.0 and 93.9% nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity, respectively, and M. psychrophilus Z-0021T, with respective 89.3 and 91.9% identity (Table 1, Fig. 1b). In general, the pmoA gene identity of strain G7T with other Methylobacter spp. strains varied between 82.6–99.2% and 87.0–100% at nucleotide and amino acid sequence levels, respectively (Table 1, Fig. 1b).
Genome analysis
The full statistics of de novo assemblies and genome characteristics of strain G7T, as well as other Methylobacter spp. isolates and MAGs, are reported in Table 2. The draft genome of strain G7T consisted of 1 contig, with 4,003,569 bp in total length, G+C content of 47.7 mol%, 3,804 CDSs, 9 rRNA and 45 tRNA genes. The genome quality was very high as shown with high genomic completeness (99.4%) and low contamination (3.1%), assessed using CheckM (v1.2.2, Methylococcales.ms marker set) [29], the criteria for very high quality being >95% and <5%, respectively [30].
Table 2. Genome characteristics (size, number of CDSs, tRNAs and rRNAs and G+C content), genes encoding methane and methanol oxidation, as well as N2 fixation, and estimated genomic completeness and contamination of genomes of Methylobacter sp.
| Strain | Size (bp) | Contigs | CDS | tRNA | 5S rRNA | 16S rRNA | 23S rRNA | GC% | CH4 oxid. | CH3OH oxid. | N2 fix. | Compl. (%) | Contam. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. arcticus G7T | 4003569 | 1 | 3804 | 45 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 47.7 | pmoCAB1 | mxaFIJGACKLD2, xoxF3 | – | 99.43 | 3.11 |
| Ca. M. titanis K-2018 (GCA_029945785.1) | 3468869 | 155 | 3149 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 47.9 | pmoCAB | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | – | 98.9 | 1.82 |
| Ca. M. titanis D1-2020 (GCA_029946125.1) | 3510200 | 146 | 3209 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 47.7 | pmoCAB | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | – | 99.24 | 1.58 |
| M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT (GCA_037671525.1) | 4316257 | 220 | 4072 | 42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 47.9 | pmoCAB | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH4 | 99.72 | 0.63 |
| M. tundripaludum 21/22 (GCA_000685925.1) | 4665210 | 1 | 4176 | 45 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 49.5 | pmoCAB (pxmABC)5 | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.8 | 1.32 |
| M. tundripaludum SV96T (GCA_000190755.3) | 4848329 | 3 | 4412 | 45 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 49.5 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.8 | 0 |
| M. tundripaludum OWC-DMM (GCA_002934385.1) | 4607785 | 27 | 4087 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 49.5 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.8 | 0 |
| M. tundripaludum 31/32 (GCA_000733835.1) | 5047546 | 2 | 4605 | 45 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 49.2 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.8 | 1.7 |
| Ca. M. oryzae KRF1 (GCA_003994235.2) | 5071213 | 121 | 4431 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 49.3 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 98.88 | 0.49 |
| M. sp. S3L5C (GCA_022788635.1) | 4815745 | 1 | 4342 | 48 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 43.3 | pmoCAB, mmoXYZBCD6 | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.38 | 2.45 |
| M. psychrophilus Z-0021T (GCA_025583945.1) | 4691082 | 156 | 4076 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 43.1 | pmoCAB, mmoXYZBCD | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.38 | 1.24 |
| M. luteus IMV-B-3098 (GCA_000427625.1) | 5029135 | 4 | 4571 | 49 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 51.1 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.4 | 0.14 |
| M. marinus A45T (GCA_000383855.1) | 4988792 | 2 | 4486 | 50 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 52.7 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 98.5 | 1.58 |
| M. whittenburyi BBA5.1 (GCA_000746145.1) | 5074273 | 88 | 4567 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 52.2 | pmoCAB (pxmABC) | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 98.81 | 1.28 |
| Ca. M. coli BlB1 (GCA_015476545.1) | 4865836 | 227 | 4397 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 51.3 | pmoCAB | mxaFIJGACKLD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.55 | 0.78 |
| Ca. M. favarea B2 (GCA_902806695.1) | 4073239 | 134 | 3783 | 36 | nd | nd | nd | 47.2 | pmoCAB | mxaFJD, xoxF | nifDKH | 99.21 | 0.34 |
(1) pmoCAB=particulate methane monooxygenase, (2) mxaFIJGACKLD=calcium-dependent methanol dehydrogenase, (3) xoxF=lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase, (4) nitrogenase, (5) pxmABC=a sequence divergent particulate monooxygenase with currently unknown function and (6) mmoXYZBCD=soluble methane monooxygenase.
In contrast to 16S rRNA gene analyses, where strain G7T had the highest similarity to M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, the genomic comparisons showed that strain G7T was most similar with the MAGs representing Ca. M. titanis, sharing 95.7% ANI, 94.3–94.7% average amino acid identity (AAI) and 63.6–63.8% dDDH (Table 1, Fig. 1c). Of isolated Methylobacter spp., strain G7T was most similar to M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, sharing 91.8% ANI, 89.0% AAI and 46% dDDH (Table 1, Fig. 1c). The G+C content of the genomes of strain G7T, M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT and Ca. M. titanis was also similar, at 47.7–47.9%, differing from other Methylobacter spp. (Table 2). In general, the genomic similarity of strain G7T with Methylobacter spp. isolates and MAGs assembled from enrichment cultures varied between 77.2–95.7% ANI, 70.1–94.7% AAI and 20.5–63.9% dDDH (Table 1). Considering the widely applied thresholds for 16S rRNA gene identity (<98.65%) [31,32], ANI (<95%) and dDDH (<70%) [19,32,35], as well as a previously suggested threshold for pmoA gene identity (<87 % and <93 % at nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively) [36] to delineate unique species, strain G7T represents a novel species. Based on MAG data, Ca. M. titanis would represent a closely related but different species, since dDDH between it and strain G7T was also lower than 70%. Despite sharing 16S rRNA and pmoA gene identities higher than the species-level threshold with some isolates of Methylobacter spp. (Table 1), the genome-level differences, i.e. ANI and dDDH, of strain G7T with other isolates were clearly lower than the species-level thresholds (Table 1). Altogether, this data suggests that strain G7T represents a novel species of Methylobacter spp., for which G7T is the only currently existing isolate. It has to be noted, however, that the 16S rRNA and pmoA gene-based phylogenetic trees and the phylogenomic tree reveal that the genus Methylobacter as currently circumscribed is polyphyletic (Fig. 1), as was also previously reported [34,37]. Hence, the clade including M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, Ca. M. titanis and strain G7ᵀ may warrant recognition as a coherent subclade, or even a separate genus, pending possible broader taxonomic revision in the future, which, however, is out of the scope of this paper.
The key metabolic pathways present in the genome of strain G7T were predicted using METABOLIC (v. 4.0) based on the KEGG database [13] (Fig. 2, Table S1). Strain G7T contains genes encoding particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoCAB) but not soluble methane monooxygenase (mmoXYZBCD) for methane oxidation, unlike Methylobacter sp. S3L5C and M. psychrophilus Z-0021T (Fig. 2, Tables 2 and S1). Additionally, several other Methylobacter spp. contain the pxmABC operon, i.e. a copper membrane monooxygenase [22], but it is absent in strain G7T (Table 2). For the conversion of methanol to formaldehyde, strain G7T contains both calcium- (mxaFJGIACKLD) and lanthanide-dependent (xoxF) methanol dehydrogenases (Fig. 2, Tables 2 and S1). All essential genes involved in both tetrahydromethanopterin (H4MPT) and tetrahydrofolate (H4F) pathways are present for formaldehyde oxidation to formate. For formate oxidation to CO2, formate dehydrogenases (fdh, fdhF and fdsD) are present in the genome. Strain G7T possesses a complete ribulose monophosphate cycle for formaldehyde assimilation into biomass, while the serine pathway is incomplete. Furthermore, it contains all functional genes encoding functions of Entner–Doudoroff, Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas, oxidative TCA pathways and oxidative phosphorylation for sugar metabolism and energy production. Several genes involving an incomplete denitrification pathway are present in the strain G7T’s genome, including nitrate reductase (narGHI) for nitrate reduction into nitrite, and nitric oxide reductase (norBC) for nitric oxide reduction to N2O, while nitrite reductases (nirKS) and nitrous-oxide reductase (nosZ) are absent. Strain G7T contains genetic potential for oxidation of sulphur compounds, such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) into elemental sulphur and polysulphides using sulphide-quinone oxidoreductase (sqr) and cytochrome subunit of sulphide dehydrogenase (fccA). It also carries the potential to oxidize thiosulphate to sulphate using the Sox enzyme complex, i.e. SoxB and SoxYZ. The analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes revealed genetic potential to produce aryl polyene, ectoine, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), NRPS-like fragments, other unspecified ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide product, NRPS-independent IucA/IucC-like siderophores (NI-siderophores), terpene precursors, terpene and redox cofactors.
Fig. 2. The proposed central metabolic pathway demonstrated carbon assimilation and energy metabolisms of Methylobacter arcticus G7T based on the assembled genome. H4MPT, tetrahydromethanopterin; H4F, methylene tetrahydrofolate; KDPG, 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate; GL6P, d-glucono-1,5-lactone 6-phosphate; Hxl6P, d-arabino-3-hexulose 6-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; EDD, Enter–Doudoroff; EMP, Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas. The list of functional gene details is provided in Table S1.
The general differences in the functional potential between Methylobacter spp. were assessed via UPGMA cluster analysis of the presence–absence data of functional traits and KEGG modules encoded in the genomes (data generated using METABOLIC [13]) (Fig. 3). Similar to phylogenetic and phylogenomic tree analyses, strain G7T was most similar to Ca. M. titanis and M. svalbardensis, suggesting that they also functionally differed from other Methylobacter spp. (Fig. 3). The clustering of Methylobacter spp. based on the functional potential correlated with the phylogenetic and phylogenomic trees (compare Figs1 3).
Fig. 3. Similarity of functional potential among Methylobacter spp. as visualized through UPGMA clustering (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index) based on presence/absence table of (a) functional traits and (b) KEGG modules.
To further show that strain G7T is a novel species of Methylobacter, its functional potential was compared with all other Methylobacter spp. Exceptionally, in contrast to all other Methylobacter spp. isolates, strain G7T did not encode nitrogenase enzyme (nifDKH), essential for N2 fixation (Table 2). MAGs representing Ca. M. titanis also lacked N2 fixation genes. The analysis of secondary metabolites revealed that besides G7T, the genes encoding ectoine production were found only in MAG representing Ca. M. titanis D1-2020, and in genomes of M. marinus A45T and Methylobacter sp. BBA5.1 (here representing the genome of M. whittenburyi since the genome of the type strain was not available).
The functional potential of strain G7T was specifically compared to the closest isolate, M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, using KEGG annotations from KofamKOALA. The number of shared genes with KO classification was 1,524 between G7T and LS7-T4AT, while G7T had 98 and LS7-T4AT had 205 unique KO-classified genes in their genomes (Fig. S2). Besides the lack of N2 fixation potential, compared to LS7-T4AT, G7T lacked genetic potential to e.g. NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (nuoA-N), cyanate lyase (cynS) and hydroxylamine reductase (hcp). Furthermore, strain G7T encoded a larger number of potential biofilm formation and carotenoid biosynthesis genes (i.e. 20 and 5 genes, respectively) than LS7-T4AT (i.e. 14 and 1 genes, respectively), while LS7-T4AT encoded a larger number of potential quorum-sensing genes (11 genes) than G7T (5 genes). In addition, METABOLIC results suggested that strain G7T and LS7-T4AT differed in their genetic potential for iron cycling. Both had the cyc1 gene encoding iron oxidation and FmnB, Ndh2 and DmkB genes encoding dissimilatory iron reduction, but in contrast to LS7-T4AT, strain G7T lacked the MtoA gene encoding iron oxidation and several other genes encoding dissimilatory iron reduction (MtrA, MtrB_TIGR03509, DFE_0448, DFE_0449, DFE_0461 and DFE_0462; see Garber et al. [38] and references therein for further information on these genes). The genetic potential for secondary metabolite production was otherwise similar between G7T and LS7-T4AT (see above the listing for G7T), except for the lack of ectoine production genes in LS7-T4AT. The exceptional lack of N2 fixation potential in strain G7T compared to other Methylobacter spp., and the other differences in functional potential revealed in the comparison of LS7-T4AT and strain G7T, further supports the assignation of strain G7T as representative of a novel Methylobacter species.
To explain if the observed genetic differences could be linked to habitat adaptation of G7T and LS7-T4AT, further physicochemical characterizations of the isolation habitats and metagenomic screening and experimental studies would be needed. However, some testable hypotheses on their potential ecological differences can be made based on genetic data. The larger number of biofilm formation genes in the genome of G7T likely predicts its lifestyle as biofilm-forming cells on the coal surface, whereas LS7-T4AT more likely lives as free cells in the aquatic sediment. Furthermore, as carotenoids act as antioxidants [39], and ectoine is a natural osmo-protectant produced by many bacterial species to survive extreme environmental conditions like high salinity, temperature and drought [40], it can be predicted that the larger number of these genes in the genome of G7T reflects its higher need for stress tolerance mechanism in the coal mine. The higher number of genes encoding dissimilatory iron oxidation and reduction in the genome of LS7-T4AT may reflect habitat differences, i.e. higher availability of oxidized and reduced iron in the aquatic sediment with a natural redox gradient than on the coal surface.
Morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics
The cells of strain G7T were Gram-stain-negative, motile rods (0.8–1.0×1.5–2.0 µm) (Fig. 4). Cells reproduced by binary fission. The strain was shown to grow at 4–21 °C with optimum growth at 8 °C (Table 3) [8]. It did not grow at +23 °C or +27 °C. The growth was not tested at temperatures lower than +4 °C [8]. Strain G7T did not grow in 0% methanol, but there was growth at methanol concentrations from 0.01 to 1%, with increasing growth at higher concentrations. Nitrate and ammonia supported growth equally well, whereas no growth was detected when N2 was the only available nitrogen source. NaCl at 0.5% was tolerated, 1% inhibited growth, and above 2% NaCl, no growth was detected. The optimal pH of G7T was 6–7, with a growth range of approximately pH 5 to 9.
Fig. 4. Morphological characteristics of strain G7T. (a) Phase-contrast microscopy image of living cells. (b) SEM image of cells. (c) TEM image of ultrathin sections of the cells. The white arrow indicates the intracytoplasmic membranes (ICMs) arranged in stacks.
Table 3. Comparison of major characteristics of strain G7T with its phylogenetically closest relatives.
| M. arcticus G7T | M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT | Ca. M. titanis | Methylobacter sp. S3L5C | M. psychrophilus Z-0021T | M. tundripaludum SV96T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell morphology | Rod | Coccoid to rod | Cocci | Cocci | Cocci | Rods |
| Cell size (µm) | 0.8–1.0×1.5–2.0 | 0.8–1.2×1.6–2.2 | nd | 1.0–1.8 in diameter | 1.0–1.7 in diameter | 0.8–1.3×1.9–2.5 With characteristic four-cell chains |
| Motility | Yes | Yes, some | nd | No | No | Yes, some |
| Pigmentation | Pink | Light pink | nd | Cream | Pinkish | Pale pink |
| Growth T (optimal) | 4–21 °C (8 °C)* | 1–22 °C (10–15 °C) | 5–30 °C (15 °C)† | 0.1–20 °C (8–12 °C) | 1–20 °C (3.5–10 °C) | 5–30 °C (23 °C) |
| Growth pH (optimal) | 5–9 (6–7) | 6.4–9.3 (7.5–8) | nd | 6–8.3 (6–7.3) | 5.9–7 (6.7) | 5.5–7.9 |
| Growth on nitrate (N) vs ammonium (A) | Both, equally good | N | nd | Both, A best | Both, A best | Both, N best |
| Growth on N2 | nd (no nitrogenase gene detected) | nd | nd | No | nd | nd |
| Growth on methanol | Yes | Yes | nd | Yes | Yes | No, poorly |
| Major PFLA(s) | 16 : 1ɷ7c, 16 : 1ɷ5c | nd | nd | nd | 16 : 1 | 16 : 1ɷ8, 16 : 1ɷ7, 16 : 1ɷ5t |
| NaCl tolerance (inhibition level in NMS) | >1% w/v | >0.5% w/v | nd | nd | nd | >0% w/v |
| Source | Arctic coal mine biofilm | Arctic Lagoon Pingo sediments | Antarctic lake sediment | Boreal lake water | Arctic tundra soil | Arctic wetland soil |
| Reference | This study and Tveit et al. [8] | Patil et al. [22] | Roldán and Menes [25] | Khanongnuch et al. [26] | Omelchenko et al. [23,24] | Wartiainen et al. [27] |
*Tested in six temperatures: +4 °C, 8 °C, 15 °C, 21 °C, 23°C and 27 °C. G7 does not grow at 23 °C or 27 °C.
†Data from enrichment culture. Ca. M. titanis has not been isolated.
Strain G7T had a lower optimum growth temperature than its close relatives, M. svalbardensis LS7-T4AT, Ca. M. titanis and M. tundripaludum SV96T, and Ca. M. titanis and SV96T grew at higher temperatures than G7T (Table 3). The growth temperature range and optimum temperature of G7T were similar to those of Methylobacter sp. S3L5C and M. psychrophilus Z-0021T, yet cell morphologies differed (Table 3). G7T could grow at a lower pH than its close relatives, and its optimum growth pH was also lower than that of LS7-T4AT (Table 3). The PLFA profile of G7T also differed from that of SV96T [8]. Comparison of PLFA profiles of G7T to those of LS7-T4AT, S3L5C and Z-0021T cannot be done due to the lack of data for LS7-T4AT and S3L5C, and for Z-0021T, it is only reported that its main PLFA is 16 : 1 [23].
In conclusion, based on phenotypic, genetic and phylogenetic data, strain G7T represents a novel species within the genus Methylobacter for which the name Methylobacter arcticus sp. nov. is proposed.
Description of Methylobacter arcticus sp. nov.
Methylobacter arcticus (arc’ti.cus. L. masc. adj. arcticus, northern, pertaining to the Arctic). Cells are Gram-stain-negative, motile rods with a diameter of ~0.8–1.0 µm and 1.5–2.0 µm long. The cell possesses a gammaproteobacterial ICM structure. They form circular pink colonies with even edges and do not produce water-soluble pigments. Cultivation is done in NMS medium (DSMZ medium 921, pH 6.8) with a headspace consisting of 20% methane (v/v) in air. Carbon and energy sources are methane and methanol. The strain can use both nitrate and ammonium but does not fix nitrogen and does not require vitamins. It tolerates a broad temperature range from <4 °C to 21 °C, with optimal growth at 8 °C and pH 6–7.
PLFAs are C12 : 0, C14 : 0, C15 : 0, C16 : 1 ω11c, C16 : 1 ω7c, C16 : 1 ω5c, C16 : 0 and C18 : 1 ω7c, of which the major ones (>10%) are C16 : 1 ω7c (58.1%) and C16 : 1 ω5c (16.7%). The G+C content is 47.7 mol%. The GenBank accession numbers for the genome and the 16S rRNA gene sequence are CP159583 and PV005874, respectively. The raw sequence reads of the genome are stored in Short Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1127878.
The type strain is G7T (=DSM 117899T= LMG 33632T) which was isolated from the coal mine Gruve 7, in Adventdalen, Svalbard, Norway.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani for access to coal mine Gruve 7 in Adventdalen and for help with the sampling. We thank Peter Frenzel and Ricardo Alves for contributions during sampling in the coal mine in August 2009.
Abbreviations
- AAI
average amino acid identity
- ANI
average nucleotide identity
- dDDH
digital DNA–DNA hybridization
- gDNA
genomic DNA
- ICMs
intracytoplasmic membranes
- MAG
metagenome-assembled genome
- NMS
nitrate mineral salts
- NRPS
non-ribosomal peptide synthetase
- PLFAs
phospholipid fatty acids
- SEM
scanning electron microscopy
- TEM
transmission electron microscopy
- TYGS
Type Strain Genome Server
Footnotes
Funding: The work was supported by The Research Council of Norway Grants 191696/V49 and Living on Air 315129, as well as The Research Council of Finland Grants 346751 and 353750.
Contributor Information
Antti J. Rissanen, Email: antti.rissanen@tuni.fi.
Anne Grethe Hestnes, Email: anne.hestnes@uit.no.
Ramita Khanongnuch, Email: ramita.khanongnuch@ut.ee.
Alena Didriksen, Email: alena.didriksen@uit.no.
Tim Urich, Email: tim.urich@uni-greifswald.de.
Alexander T. Tveit, Email: alexander.t.tveit@uit.no.
Mette M. Svenning, Email: mette.svenning@uit.no.
References
- 1.Collins DA, Akberdin IR, Kalyuzhnaya MG. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. Methylobacter; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kallistova AYu, Montonen L, Jurgens G, Münster U, Kevbrina MV, et al. Culturable psychrotolerant methanotrophic bacteria in landfill cover soil. Microbiology. 2013;82:847–855. doi: 10.1134/S0026261714010044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saunois M, Stavert AR, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2020;12:1561–1623. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wolińska A, Pytlak A, Stępniewska Z, Kuźniar A, Piasecki C. Identification of methanotrophic bacteria community in the Jastrzebie-Moszczenica coal mine by fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR techniques. Pol J Environ Stud. 2013;22:275–282. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stępniewska Z, Pytlak A, Kuźniar A. Distribution of the methanotrophic bacteria in the Western part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Borynia-Zofiówka and Budryk coal mines) Int J Coal Geol. 2014;130:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stępniewska Z, Pytlak A. Methanotrophic activity of coalbed rocks from "Bogdanka" coal mine (south-east poland) Arch Environ Prot. 2022;34:183–191. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stępniewska Z, Pytlak A, Kuźniar A. Methanotrophic activity in Carboniferous coalbed rocks. Int J Coal Geol. 2013;106:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tveit AT, Söllinger A, Rainer EM, Didriksen A, Hestnes AG, et al. Thermal acclimation of methanotrophs from the genus Methylobacter. ISME J. 2023;17:502–513. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01363-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DOE Joint Genome Institute Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. 2012. https://jgi.doe.gov/sites/default/files/2025-01/JGI-Bacterial-DNA-isolation-CTAB-Protocol.pdf
- 10.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 2017;27:737–746. doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Breister AM, Liu Y, Kieft K, et al. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome. 2022;10:33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01213-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, et al. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:W32–W38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2251–2252. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Segata N, Börnigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2304. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Asnicar F, Thomas AM, Beghini F, Mengoni C, Manara S, et al. Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2500. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16366-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics . 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rodríguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species: culture-independent genomic approaches identify credibly distinct clusters, avoid cultivation bias, and provide true insights into microbial species. Microbe Magazine. 2014;9:111–118. doi: 10.1128/microbe.9.111.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Patil SK, Islam T, Tveit A, Hodson A, Øvreås L. Targeting methanotrophs and isolation of a novel psychrophilic Methylobacter species from a terrestrial Arctic alkaline methane seep in Lagoon Pingo, Central Spitsbergen (78° N) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek . 2024;117:60. doi: 10.1007/s10482-024-01953-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Omelchenko MV, Vasilyeva LV, Zavarzin GA. Psychrophilic methanotroph from tundra soil. Curr Microbiol. 1993;27:255–259. doi: 10.1007/BF01575988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Omel’Chenko MV, Vasil’Eva LV, Zavarzin GA, Savel’Eva ND, Lysenko AM, et al. A novel psychrophilic methanotroph of the genus Methylobacter. Микробиология. 1996;65:384–389. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roldán DM, Menes RJ. Characterisation of “Candidatus Methylobacter titanis” sp. nov., a putative novel species of Methylobacter clade 2 and their distribution in sediments of freshwater lakes in maritime Antarctica. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2023;116:721–738. doi: 10.1007/s10482-023-01840-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Khanongnuch R, Mangayil R, Svenning MM, Rissanen AJ. Characterization and genome analysis of a psychrophilic methanotroph representing a ubiquitous Methylobacter spp. cluster in boreal lake ecosystems. ISME Commun . 2022;2:85. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00172-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wartiainen I, Hestnes AG, McDonald IR, Svenning MM. Methylobacter tundripaludum sp. nov., a methane-oxidizing bacterium from Arctic wetland soil on the Svalbard islands, Norway (78 degrees N) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:109–113. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63728-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rissanen AJ, Mangayil R, Svenning MM, Khanongnuch R. Draft genome sequence data of a psychrophilic tundra soil methanotroph, Methylobacter psychrophilus Z-0021 (DSM 9914) Data Brief. 2022;45:108689. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:346–351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Orata FD, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Sauvageau D, Stein LY. Phylogenomic analysis of the gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs (Order Methylococcales) calls for the reclassification of members at the genus and species levels. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3162. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Degelmann DM, Borken W, Drake HL, Kolb S. Different atmospheric methane-oxidizing communities in European beech and Norway spruce soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:3228–3235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02730-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knief C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1346. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A, McAllister SM, Chan CS, et al. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:37. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.López G-D, Álvarez-Rivera G, Carazzone C, Ibáñez E, Leidy C, et al. Bacterial carotenoids: extraction, characterization, and applications. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2023;53:1239–1262. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2021.2016366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ng HS, Wan P-K, Kondo A, Chang J-S, Lan JC-W. Production and recovery of ectoine: a review of current state and future prospects. Processes. 2023;11:339. doi: 10.3390/pr11020339. Epub ahead of print 2023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




