Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2025 Nov 21;1261:1–15. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1261.155406

Description and life history of a new genus and species of Limacodidae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea) from Taiwan, the first with a monkey-slug-like caterpillar from outside the New World

Yu-Chi Lin 1, Rung-Juen Lin 2, Marc E Epstein 3,✉
PMCID: PMC12663721  PMID: 41322161

Abstract

The genus Yufengusgen. nov. is established for a new species of Limacodidae, Y. atrophaneuroidessp. nov.Yufengus is from Taiwan, yet its larva is similar to monkey-slug caterpillars in the New World (Phobetron Hübner, 1825: Limacodidae) in being covered with hairy, detachable tubercles. Monkey-slug caterpillars are currently known to form a monophyletic group which include as many as eight genera in the Americas referred to as the Phobetron complex by Epstein (1996). Although the larva of Yufengus appears, in particular, most similar to the genus Phobetron, a closer look at morphology reveals fundamental differences that are shared with Asian Phrixolepia Butler, 1877. Caterpillars of the new genus are structurally similar to Phrixolepia, but Phrixolepia is more translucent, less hairy, and differs in other characters including those of adults, separated by wing pattern and genitalia. In addition to describing the new genus Yufengus, we explore whether it is indeed in the same clade as the Phobetron complex of genera from the New World. The life history and morphology of adults and immature stages are described in this study.

Key words: Detachable tubercles, hag moth, immature, mimicry, monkey slug, Phrixolepia , Yufengus

Introduction

The slug caterpillar moths (Limacodidae) exhibit a remarkable diversity in larval form. Although all limacodid caterpillars have a slug-like ventral surface, the dorsa are classified into three main types: 1) the “Nettle slug” caterpillar, the most common, is armed with rows of spines; 2) the “Gelatine slug” caterpillar, a non-stinging type of limacodid larvae, has a relatively smooth surface; and 3) the slug caterpillar with fleshy, detachable outgrowths (= tubercles), the rarest, has many fine setae (Dyar 1896, 1907, 1914; Cock et al. 1987; Epstein 1996; Zaspel et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2019). Among the last group, one of the most bizarre and recognizable species is the hairy non-venomous “monkey-slug” caterpillar or “hag moth”, Phobetron pithecium (Smith, 1797), whose fluffy appearance results from its setae-covered detachable tubercles.

The New World genus Isochaetes Dyar, 1899 has similar but translucent tubercles, hence the common name “spun-glass-slug moth”, although other genera occur in both the Neotropics and parts of Asia (Epstein and Corrales 2004; Solovyev and Witt 2009; Lin et al. 2019). New World limacodid genera known to possess detachable tubercles all appear to be in the clade referred to as the Phobetron complex (Epstein 1996): Phobetron Hübner, 1825, Isochaetes Dyar, 1899, Alarodia Möschler, 1886, some species in Euphobetron Dyar, 1905, Vipsophobetron Dyar, 1905, Microphobetron Dyar, 1912, Leucophobetron Dyar, 1897, and Heuretes Grote & Robinson, 1868 (see review of Heuretes, Alarodia, and Leucophobetron in Epstein and Miller 1990). In Asia, Phrixolepia Butler, 1877 and Olona Snellen, 1900 are the only published examples of caterpillars with these detachable tubercles (Solovyev 2009a; Solovyev et al. 2012).

The only modern phylogenetic studies of Limacodidae that included more than one genus in the Phobetron complex are those works by Zaspel et al. (2016) and Epstein et al. (in press). Zaspel included Phobetron pithecium (Smith), Isochaetes beutenmuelleri (H. Edwards), Vipsophobetron marisa (Druce), and Alarodia slossoniae (Packard). Epstein et al. includes the same species, except Phobetron hipparchia (Cramer) rather than P. pithecium, and Microphobetron rather than V. marisa. In both studies, the Phobetron complex is a clade among the gelatine caterpillars. This is contrary to Dyar (1899), which had Phobetron as sister to the “spined Eucliids” now referred to as nettles. Curiously, Dyar was aware that Phobetron fed as first instars, unlike the nettles that fast (molt quickly without feeding) in their first instar, but he held the view that these were an early branch of nettles rather than a gelatine (see Zaspel et al. 2016).

Lin et al. (2019) indicated that (Phrixolepia + Isochaetes) + “sp. 2” (= Yufengus atrophaneuroides) were a monophyletic group within the gelatine group. Liang et al. (2024), which did not include New World taxa such as Isochaetes, found that Phrixolepia + Pseudidonauton Hering was sister to both the gelatine and nettle clades. Although the position of Phrixolepia + Pseudodinauton is different, this result showing Pseudidonauton to be sister to Phrixolepia suggests that it may be another group with deciduous tubercles.

Lin did not describe Yufengus in 2019 because its adults were known only from female samples. The larva and adult morphology of the new genus and species are fundamentally different from others known to have deciduous tubercles from Asia: Phrixolepia, Olona, and Pseudidonauton (Holloway 1986; Cock et al. 1987; Solovyev 2009a, 2009b; Solovyev et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2021).

Limacodid diversity in Taiwan is notably high, given the island’s relatively small land area. Over 30 years ago the family was known to be represented by 31 genera and 50 species, as documented by Inoue (1992) in Lepidoptera of Taiwan. Solovyev (2017) added six additional species to the fauna, increasing the total to 43 genera and 58 species. Prior to the addition of Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov., according to the Catalogue of Life in Taiwan website, there were 44 genera and 62 species of Limacodidae recorded in Taiwan (Shao and Chung 2024).

Herein, we describe the new species in a new genus as well as its life history with a direction towards future phylogenetic studies that will need more taxon sampling to better understand the evolution of the unique larval characteristics found in Yufengus. This should elucidate whether deciduous tubercles in Asian and New World limacodids are ancestral or independently derived.

Materials and methods

Late instars were collected in the field in New Taipei City from their larval host plants, typically on the abaxial surface of mature leaves. Eggs and early instars were obtained from a female that was collected at a mercury light trap in Hualien County. Larvae were reared individually in plastic containers (150 × 75 × 45 mm). Fresh foliage was provided with moist tissue paper to prevent dehydration. The rearing conditions were kept at a constant temperature of 25 °C and 16:8 [L:D] per day. Descriptions of the immature stages and observations on the species’ biology were based on the rearing lot HSU 16C67M, 22B39M, and 22B40M. The rearing lot follows the system of Powell and De Benedictis (1995), where “HSU 22B40M” refers to the name of the rearing database (HSU), the year (22 for 2022), the month (B for February), the sequential number of collection (15), and the taxonomic group (M for moth). Voucher material is deposited in the Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (NTNU).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of adult legs and caterpillars was performed with JEOL JSM-5600 scanning electron microscope. Following critical point drying (CPD), we attached the samples to stubs (15 mm diameter) and used a LADD critical-point dryer and coated them with gold palladium using a JEOL JEE-400 Vacuum Evaporator.

Wing venation was prepared by first removing wings with micro-scissors and forceps under the microscope. The wings were then moistened with 70% ethanol in a petri dish. A diluted bleach solution (ratio of bleach to water was one to four) was poured into the petri dish to soak the wing set for a few minutes, after which the scales of the wing were removed by a fine brush. Finally, the wing set was fixed in 95% ethanol and then 100% ethanol before being mounted in Euparal and preserved on glass microscope slides.

Dissection of the genitalia was performed by first removing the entire abdomen, which was placed in 10% KOH and boiled for 10 min. The abdominal integument and genital capsule stained in a weak solution of Phthalocyanine pigment for an hour, and then transferred to 30% ethanol for cleaning, dissection, and examination. Completed dissections were fixed in 95% ethanol and then 100% ethanol before being mounted in Euparal and preserved on glass microscope slides.

Morphological characters follow those in Epstein et al. (in press). Primary types are deposited in the following collections:

BMNH The Natural History Museum, London

NTNU Department of Biology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei

Results

. Yufengus

Lin, Lin & Epstein gen. nov.

CF062DA8-F0D7-53C1-8859-7AAD62BFE05B

https://zoobank.org/FCB81D71-7956-4D9F-BAD6-85B9BD7BC7D5

Type species.

Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov. (here designated).

Diagnosis.

No known adults or larvae of Limacodidae from Asia are similar in general appearance to Yufengus. Structurally they are most comparable to Phrixolepia as larvae (Figs 36–39, 52–56) and adults (Figs 57, 58), although adult Phrixolepia forewing lacks the distinct white forewing spots and dark subapical marking on ventral surface (Figs 9–12), have male filiform (Fig. 15) rather than bipectinate antenna (Fig. 13), have Rs4 originating beyond discal cell (Fig. 18) rather than from discal cell, have gnathos present (Fig. 21) rather than absent, have coiled ductus bursae (Fig. 22) rather than straight, and the labial palp 3rd segment is much shorter compared to 2nd segment compared to Yufengus (Fig. 16) (Note: the description of Yufengus is found below under Y. atrophaneuroides).

Figures 23–40.

Figures 23–40.

Open in a new tab

Immature stages of Yufengus and Phrixolepia.23, 34.Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov.; 23. Egg with late stage embryo; 24. First instar; 25. Second instar; 26–28. Early instars; 29. Final instar collected from New Taipei City, dorsal view; 30, 31. Final instar collected from Hualien County, dorsal and lateral views; 32. A quadripod tubercle of the final instar; 33, 34. Cocoons with silk blending setae of final instar and forming a thin outer membrane; 35–40.Phrixolepia inouei; 35. Egg; 36. First instar; 37. Second instar; 38, 39. Final instar, dorsal and lateral views; 40. Cocoon. Scale bars: 1 mm (23–25, 32, 35–37); 5 mm (26–31, 33, 34, 38–40).

Figures 41–58.

Figures 41–58.

Open in a new tab

The final instar larva, pupa, and female 5th tarsomere by scanning electron microscope. 41–51.Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov.; 41. Larval head (Lbr: labrum, An: antenna, Mx:maxillary palps; 42. Larval labrum with multiple spinules anteriorly and laterally; 43. 6 stemmata (St1–6) and stemma seta (SS); 44. Spinneret; 45. Pretarsal claw of the thoracic leg without axial seta; 46. Plumose setae of larval tubercles; 47–49. Eclosed pupa (arrow points to the location of absent maxillary extension), ventral, dorsal, and lateral views; 50. Female 5th tarsomere with sensilla trichodea; 52–58.Phrixolepia inouei; 51. Sensilla and spinules of female 5th tarsomere; 52. Larval head; 53. Spinneret; 54. 6 stemmata and stemma seta (arrow points to the remaining seta pit); 55. Pretarsal claw of the thoracic leg with axial seta; 56. A quadripod tubercle of the final instar; 57. Female 5th tarsomere with sensilla trichodea; 58. Sensilla of female 5th tarsomere. Scale bars: 500 μm (41, 52); 100 μm (42–44, 50, 53, 54, 57); 50 μm (45–46, 51, 55); 1 mm (47–49, 56); 10 μm (58).

Figures 9–12.

Figures 9–12.

Open in a new tab

Adults of Phrixolepia inouei; 9, 10. Male, upperside and underside; 11, 12. Female, upperside and underside. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Figures 13–16.

Figures 13–16.

Open in a new tab

Adult head. 13. Male head of Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov. with only one side of labial palp and small proboscis, paratype, HSU 22B39M; 14. Labial palp without scales of Y. atrophaneuroides sp. nov.; 15. Male head of P. inouei with only one side of labial palp and small proboscis; 16. Labial palp without scales of P. inouei. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figures 17, 18.

Figures 17, 18.

Open in a new tab

Wing venation. 17.Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov., paratype, HSU 22B39M; 18.Phrixolepia inouei. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figures 19–22.

Figures 19–22.

Open in a new tab

Genitalia. 19.Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov., male, paratype, HSU 22B39M; 20.Y. atrophaneuroides sp. nov., female, paratype, HSU 16C67M; 21.Phrixolepia inouei, male; 22.P. inouei, female. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Etymology.

The genus is named after Dr Yu-Feng Hsu, the advisor of the first two authors, who has provided support and encouragement for limacodid studies over the past 10 years.

. Yufengus atrophaneuroides

Lin, Lin & Epstein sp. nov.

A00AC1D9-AC61-50D1-993B-D9F47D652A8F

https://zoobank.org/D5DB4CBA-9BE3-49B0-BFB8-3749632A3D31

Figs 1–8, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 23–34, 41–51

Figures 1–8.

Figures 1–8.

Open in a new tab

Adults of Yufengus atrophaneuroides sp. nov. 1, 2. Male, holotype, HSU 22B39M, upperside and underside; 3, 4. Male, paratype, HSU 22B40M, upperside and underside; 5, 6. Female, paratype, HSU 16C67M, upperside and underside; 7, 8. Male legs, paratype, HSU 22B39M, with scales and without scales (left to right: foreleg to hind leg). Scale bars: 10 mm (1–6), 1 mm (7, 8).

Type materials.

Holotype. Taiwan • 1 ♂; New Taipei City, Wulai, Xinfu Rd.; 24.8259, 121.5240; alt. 380 m; 28 Feb. 2022; Y.C. Lin, R. J. Lin, C J. Hung & H. Chang leg.; reared from Oreocnide pedunculata, pupated 21 Mar. 2022, emerged 17 Apr. 2022; HSU 22B39M (Figs 1, 2).

Paratypes. Taiwan • 1 ♂; New Taipei City, Wulai, Xinfu Rd.; 24.8259, 121.5240; alt. 380 m; 28 Feb. 2022; Y.C. Lin, R.J. Lin, C.J. Hung & H. Chang leg.; reared from Oreocnide pedunculata, pupated 25 Mar. 2022, emerged 23 Apr. 2022; HSU 22B39M (Figs 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 19) • 1 ♂; New Taipei City, Wulai, Xinfu Rd.; 24.8259, 121.5240; alt. 380 m; 28 Feb. 2022; Y.C. Lin, R.J. Lin, C.J. Hung & H. Chang leg.; reared from Mussaenda parviflora, pupated 9 Mar. 2022, emerged 31 Mar. 2016; HSU 22B40M (Figs 3, 4) • 1 ♀; New Taipei City, Wulai, Xinxian; 24.8355, 121.5274; alt. 220 m; 31 Mar. 2016; M.X. Luo & H.P. Lu. leg.; reared from Smilax bracteata, emerged 4 May 2016; GenBank: MK128293; HSU 16C67M (Figs 5, 6, 20).

Diagnosis.

See under Yufengus above.

Description.

Male (Figs 1–8, 13, 14, 17). Head: frons hairy, brown with yellow scaling; eyes semioval, black; antenna bipectinate from base to apex, medial side of antenna protrusions shorter than the lateral side; labial palpus upcurved with the apex pointing dorsally, covering dark brown scales dorsally and yellow scales ventrally, with the 3rd segment longer than 1/3 of 2nd segment (Fig. 14); proboscis present (Fig. 13). Thorax: dark brown, with long, yellow hairs laterally and posteriorly near abdomen; legs brown, banded with yellow on tarsi (Fig. 7), midleg with one pair of tibial spurs, hindleg with two pairs of tibial spurs, each pair of unequal length (Fig. 8). Forewing: 8.16–8.79 mm long (x̄: 8.44 ± 0.32 mm, n = 3). Upperside ground color dark brown, a reddish-brown spot surrounded by black at apex, three black patches on discal cell, discal area, and postdiscal area. Four white spots from inner margin to discal cell (latter two sometimes invisible) (Figs 1, 3), fringe with dark-brown scales. Underside ground color dark brown, broadly pale grey along inner margin, a reddish-brown spot surrounded by black at apex. Forewing venation: Rs2 and Rs3 on common branch originating from Rs1 near discal cell; Rs4 originating from discal cell; MS bisecting discal cell; 1A+2A with basal fork. Hindwing: upperside dark brown; fringe with contrasting pale-yellow scales, becoming mostly black near tornus. Underside similar to upperside. Hindwing venation: MS present in discal cell; a very short cross vein between R and RS at the proximal third of the wing, inside the discal cell; RS and M1 meet at outer end of discal cell; CuP, 1A+2A, and 3A present as typical in Limacodidae. Abdomen: dark-brown dorsum, yellow in posterior half of ventrum.

Female (Figs 5, 6, 50, 51). Similar to male, but larger (forewing 11.14 mm long, from base to apex); antenna filiform; ground color of wing brown, hindwing with a small dark-brown spot at apex, fringe of hindwing brown with dark scales throughout; the 5th tarsomere with a triangular, recessed pad bearing sensilla and spinules (Fig. 51); abdomen brown ventrally.

Male genitalia (Fig. 19). Uncus narrow throughout and curved slightly downward at apex. Gnathos absent. Tegumen and vinculum wider than the uncus. Juxta roughly triangular, slightly sclerotized, and setose. Valva elongate, round at apex and with short hairs on inner surface and slightly narrow at base; medial portion with sclerotized process with distal sawteeth. Saccus short. Phallus straight, tubular.

Female genitalia (Fig. 20). Papillae anales flat, drop-shaped; anterior apophyses short, digitate, posterior apophyses about two times as long as anterior apophyses. Ductus burse membranous and straight. Corpus bursae ovate, about two-thirds length of ductus burse; signum with spines: two large and a few small ones.

Immature stages (Figs 23–34, 41–49). Egg (Fig. 23): flat oval, 1.92–2.00 mm in long axis (1.97 ± 0.05 mm, n = 3) and 1.22–1.30 mm in short axis (1.26 ± 0.04 mm, n = 3). First instar larva (Fig. 24): yellow ground-colored body with broken orange stripes on mid-dorsum and dorsolateral lines. Prothorax (T1) without tubercles and T2 and T3 each have three tubercles on each side, one D tubercle on A1, two tubercles—D and SD—on A2–A9; each tubercle has three setae. Two L setae on each segment. Early to mid-instar larvae (Figs 25–28): ground color of body yellow to white; some individuals with black patches on the range of T3–A1 and A3–A5 (Fig. 26); some individuals in the stage before the final instar (Fig. 28) with the slightly visible color of the final instar. Final instar larva (Figs 29–32): 12.10–12.48 mm in length (12.3 ± 0.19 mm without spine length, n = 3), 4.93–6.69 mm in width of A3 (5.93 ± 0.9 mm without spine length, n = 3). Head dark brown; labrum with multiple spinules anteriorly and laterally (Fig. 42); stemmata with gaps of approximately the width of a stemma between stemma 1 and stemma 2, and between stemma 5 and stemma 6 (Fig. 43); has only one seta (encircled by stemmata); spinneret brush-like with apex tapered (Fig. 44). Body slug-like, ground color black. Prothorax (T1) white with no tubercles; mesothorax (T2) with two single black D tubercles, one single black SD tubercle, and two short white L tubercles; metathorax (T3) with a branched D tubercle (two black branched parts on a quadripartite base, Fig. 32), and two single black SD tubercles, and two short white L tubercles. First abdominal segment (A1) with only a branched D tubercle. Abdominal segments with same D tubercles as A2–A8 as A1 but have one single black SD tubercle on each segment, two short white outgrowths for L of A2–A8. The longest D tubercle is on A4 and there are red patches on the tubercle apices of A5–A8, especially distinct on A6 and A7; one long tubercle for D and one white tubercle for L of A9. All tubercles bear numerous plumose setae (Fig. 46) and a single long bristle with tactile function, and those for D and SD can be easily detached when touched. The pretarsal claw of the thoracic leg (Fig. 45) is wide proximally, hook-like distally, with hair-like setae. Cocoon (Figs 33, 34): spheroid, 8.36–6.80 mm in long axis (7.57 ± 0.78 mm, n = 3) and 6.96–5.63 mm in short axis (6.19 ± 0.69 mm, n = 3), brown, with silk blending setae of final instar and forming a thin outer membrane. Pupa (Figs 47–49): thin cuticle, pupal eyepiece with a fracture line, maxilla without maxillary extension, pupal frons rough and shagreened, dorsum of abdominal segments with patch of spicules along anterior margin.

Etymology.

The specific name atrophaneuroides is derived from the swallowtail genus Atrophaneura Reakirt (Papillionidae) and the Latin suffix -oides, which means “-like”, because the black and red outgrowths of the final instar is reminiscent of Atrophaneura larvae. The species epithet is a compound descriptive name comprising an adjective combination with the ending of the second name in masculine form to agree in gender with the generic name.

Distribution.

Yufengus atrophaneuroides is usually found from montane areas at low altitude in Taiwan.

Biology.

Yufengus atrophaneuroides is polyphagous. Its larvae have been found on Oreocnide pedunculata (Shirai) Masam (Urticaceae) (HSU 22B39M), Mussaenda parviflora Miq. (Rubiaceae) (HSU 22B40M), Smilax bracteata C. Presl var. verruculosa (Merr.) T. Koyama (Smilacaceae) (HSU 16C67M, 22B42M), and Maesa perlaria (Lour.) Merr. var. formosana (Mez) Yuen P. Yang (Myrsinaceae) (HSU 22B41M). According to Taiwan Moth Information Center (https://twmoth.tbri.gov.tw), established and maintained by Taiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Yufengus larvae have been found from January to June. Based on rearing data, larvae reared in captivity developed directly, with the pupal stage around a month. The cocoons (Fig. 33), similar to Phrixolepia (Fig. 40), do not encorporate the tubercles from the prepupa as in Phobetron (see figure in Epstein et al. in press). These observations suggest there are multiple generations of Y. atrophaneuroides annually. Eggs are laid singly (Fig. 23), similar to Phrixolepia (Fig. 35) and other gelatines (Epstein et al. in press).

Remarks.

The final instar larvae of Y. atrophaneuroides shows marked variation in tubercle apices from different locations. For example, there is no white patch on larvae collected from New Taipei City (Fig. 29); however, there are little white patches on larvae from Hualien County, eastern Taiwan (Figs 30, 31). According to the “Taiwan Moth Information Center”, these white patches are bigger on the larvae from Hsinchu County (collecting number: 497121; https://twmoth.tbri.gov.tw/peo/FBMothInfo/497121) than that from Hualien County; furthermore, the largest white patches occur on the larvae from Pingtung County (collecting numbers: 240751 and 339953; https://twmoth.tbri.gov.tw/peo/FBMothInfo/240751 and https://twmoth.tbri.gov.tw/peo/FBMothInfo/339953, respectively). Whether this represents discrete or continuous variation requires additional investigation. Another from Xinxian, Wulai, Taiwan on 15 Dec. 2021 by David Tai may be an earlier instar of Y. atrophaneuroides (https://twmoth.tbri.gov.tw/peo/FBMothInfo/466895).

The early instars of Y. atrophaneuroides closely resemble some mealybugs such as Phenacoccus madeirensis Green, 1923. Many mealybugs are covered with white, powdery or mealy wax secretion on the body, which are believed to protect them from predators (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). According to a mealybug study in Taiwan (Tsai 2011), P. madeirensis is widely distributed and polyphagous, and it co-occurs with Y. atrophaneuroides in New Taipei city. In the field, mealybugs have also been found in the same area where Y. atrophaneuroides occurs. Hence, the possibility of mimicry cannot be excluded.

There may be additional species in Yufengus, as suggested by larval photographs available online from outside Taiwan. For example, one is observed in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia, at 131 m on 29 Sept. 2012 by Bernard Dupont (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85512375).

Discussion

Although sampling of taxa differs between Lin et al. (2019) and Epstein et al. (in press), these studies suggest a relationship between Phrixolepia with the Phobetron complex or a genus within it, the Prolimacodes complex, or both complexes. As mentioned above, Lin et al. (2019) suggested Yufengus was related to Phrixolepia and Isochaetes. In total evidence analysis, Epstein et al. (in press) found Phrixolepia to be sister to the Phobetron complex (including Isochaetes) + the Prolimacodes complex but with molecular analysis alone (ML and BI) found Phrixolepia to be sister to the Prolimacodes complex.

Even though Yufengus has differences with Phrixolepia or Isochaetes as larva or adult, the remainder of this section we will explore their similarities to these and other genera with deciduous tubercles including New World Phobetron complex and Asian Olona Snellen.

Along with sharing deciduous tubercles there are other larval similarities between Yufengus atrophaneuroides, the New World Phobetron and Prolimacodes complexes, and Phrixolepia. These include a quadripartite tubercle base, branched D tubercles, and the absence of an SD tubercle on A1. Note that Olona also has a quadripartite tubercle base along with deciduous tubercles (Solovyev et al. 2012). An important difference between the larval morphology of Y. atrophaneuroides and the others is the appearance of “extra” tubercles after the first instar.

Additional larval similarities shared between Yufengus and Phrixolepia are also found in both the New World Phobetron and Prolimacodes complexes. These include a v-shaped spinneret in late instar (see Epstein 1996; Epstein et al. in press). Pupal similarities include the absence of a maxillary extension (Fig. 47).

Adult similarities shared between Yufengus and the New World genera Phobetron, Isochaetes, Semyra, and Prolimacodes include a branching Rs2 + Rs3 off of Rs1, a straight aedeagus, and the dorsal medial process of the valvae. Adults of Yufengus are similar to Semyra in two aspects of the forewing: the silver macula below the discal cell on the dorsum and a brown patch near the apex of the ventrum.

In conclusion, the retention of tubercles in Yufengus and others, albeit deciduously, is not so odd given that most other gelatines, including the Prolimacodes complex, do not possess tubercles after the first instar. It is for future research with more taxon sampling to determine a more precise placement for Yufengus and Phrixolepia, and other Old World gelatines with or without deciduous tubercles.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Yufengus
XML Treatment for Yufengus atrophaneuroides

Acknowledgements

We thank Yu-Feng Hsu, Li-Hao Wang, Jia-Yuan Liang, Chia-Lung Huang, Chih-Wei Huang, Min-Xin Luo, Hsin-Pei Lu, Chiao-Jen Hung, Hsiang Chang, Zhi-Jun Huang, and Fan-Rong Kung for assistance in the field. Furthermore, we thank Yu-Feng Hsu, Yi-Yang Lu, and Yu-Ming Hsu for discussion and encouragement. Finally, we thank Wei-Chun Chien for helping operate the scanning electron microscope.

Citation

Lin Y-C, Lin R-J, Epstein ME (2025) Description and life history of a new genus and species of Limacodidae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea) from Taiwan, the first with a monkey-slug-like caterpillar from outside the New World. ZooKeys 1261: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1261.155406

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Author ORCIDs

Yu-Chi Lin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-0188

Marc E. Epstein https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8659-5815

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Butler AG. (1877) Descriptions of new species of Heterocera from Japan.— Part I. Sphinges and Bombyces. Annals & Magazine of Natural History 20(120): 473–483. 10.1080/00222937708682268 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cock MJW, Godfray HCJ, Holloway JD. (1987) Slug and nettle caterpillars. In: Cock MJW, Godfray HCJ, Holloway JD (Eds) The Biology, Taxonomy and Control of the Limacodidae of Economic Importance on Palms in South-East Asia. CAB International, Wallingford, 270 pp. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dyar HG. (1896) The life-histories of the New York slug caterpillars. III–VI. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 4(4): 167–190. https://biostor.org/reference/13888 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dyar HG. (1897) On the white Eucleidae and the larva of Calybia slossoniae (Packard). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 5(3): 121–126. https://biostor.org/reference/13915 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dyar HG. (1899) Life-history of a European slug caterpillar, Cochlidion avellane. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 7(3): 202–208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25002862
  6. Dyar HG. (1905) A list of American cochlidian moths, with descriptions of new genera and species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 29(1423): 359–396. 10.5479/si.00963801.29-1423.359 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dyar HG. (1907) The life-histories of the New York slug caterpillars. XIX. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 15(4): 219–226. https://biostor.org/reference/119236 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dyar HG. (1912) Descriptions of new species and genera of Lepidoptera, chiefly from Mexico. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 42(1885): 39–106. 10.5479/si.00963801.42-1885.39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dyar HG. (1914) The life-histories of the New York slug caterpillars. XX. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 22(3): 223–229. https://biostor.org/reference/119120 [Google Scholar]
  10. Epstein ME. (1996) Revision and phylogeny of the limacodid-group families, with evolutionary studies on slug caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Zygaenoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 102 pp. 10.5479/si.00810282.582 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Epstein ME, Corrales JF. (2004) Twenty-five new species of Costa Rican Limacodidae (Lepidoptera: Zygaenoidea). Zootaxa 701(1): 1–86. 10.11646/zootaxa.701.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Epstein ME, Miller SE. (1990) Systematics of the West Indian moth genus Heuretes (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 92(4): 705–715. [Google Scholar]
  13. Epstein ME, Dupont ST, Garzón-Orduña IJ, Solovyev AV, Pierce NE, Espeland M. (2025) [in press] Insect Systematics and Diversity XX(X) X: ixae042. 10.1093/isd/ixae042 [DOI]
  14. Grote AR, Robinson CT. (1868) Descriptions of American Lepidoptera.—No. 4. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 2: 179–206. 10.2307/25076204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M. (1997) Adaptations in scale insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42(1): 23–50. 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Holloway JD. (1986) The moths of Borneo. Part I. Key to families: Families Cossidae, Metarbelidae, Ratardidae, Dudgeoneidae, Epipyropidae and Limacodidae. Malayan Nature Journal 40(1–2): 1–165. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hübner J. (1825) Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge. Jakob Hübner, Augsburg, 305–431. 10.5962/bhl.title.48607 [DOI]
  18. Inoue H. (1992) Limacodidae. In: Heppner JB, Inoue H. (Eds) Lepidoptera of Taiwan, volume 1, part 2: checklist.Association for Tropical Lepidoptera Inc., Gainesville, 101–102.
  19. Liang J, Zhu Y, Solovyev AV, He M, Lohman DJ, Wahlberg N, Li W, Li J, Wang M, Liang D, Wang H. (2024) A phylogenetic framework of Palaearctic and Indomalayan Limacodidae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea) based on sequence capture data. Systematic Entomology 49(3): 1–12. 10.1111/syen.12626 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin YC, Lin RJ, Braby MF, Hsu YF. (2019) Evolution and losses of spines in slug caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Ecology and Evolution 9(17): 9827–9840. 10.1002/ece3.5524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Möschler HB. (1886) Beiträge zur Schmetterlings-Fauna von Jamaica. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 14(3): 25–87. 10.5962/bhl.title.9474 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Powell JA, De Benedictis JA. (1995) Biological relationships: Host tree preferences and isolation by pheromones among allopatric and sympatric populations of western Choristoneura. University of California Publications in Entomology 115: 21–68.
  23. Shao K, Chung K. (2024) The National Checklist of Taiwan (Catalogue of Life in Taiwan, TaiCOL). Version 1.13. Taiwan Biodiversity Information Facility (TaiBIF). Checklist dataset. 10.15468/auw1kd [DOI]
  24. Solovyev AV. (2009a) A taxonomic review of the genus Phrixolepia (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae). Entomological Review 89(6): 1064–1078. 10.1134/S0013873809060098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Solovyev AV. (2009b) Notes on South-East Asian Limacodidae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea) with one new genus and eleven new species. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 152(1): 167–183. 10.1163/22119434-900000273 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Solovyev AV. (2017) Limacodid moths (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) of Taiwan, with descriptions of six new species. Entomological Review 97(8): 1140–1148. 10.1134/S0013873817080140 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Solovyev AV, Witt TJ. (2009) The Limacodidae of Vietnam. Entomofauna Supplement 16: 33–229. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/ENTS_S16_0001-0331.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. Solovyev AV, Galsworthy SA, Kendrick R. (2012) A new species of the genus Olona Snellen (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) with notes on immature stages. Lepidoptera Science 63(2): 70–78. 10.18984/lepid.63.2_70 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsai MY. (2011) Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) of Taiwan. Ph.D. thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
  30. Wu J, Solovyev AV, Han HL. (2021) Two new species of the genus Pseudidonauton Hering, 1931 from China (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae). ZooKeys 1059: 173–181. 10.3897/zookeys.1059.68512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zaspel JM, Weller SJ, Epstein ME. (2016) Origin of the hungry caterpillar: evolution of fasting in slug moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94: 827–832. 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Yufengus
zookeys.1261.155406-treatment1.xml (16.2KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Yufengus atrophaneuroides
zookeys.1261.155406-treatment2.xml (37.1KB, xml)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES