Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2025 Nov-Dec;71(11-12):723–725. doi: 10.46747/cfp.711112723

Prophylactic salbutamol use for pediatric exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Connor L Flynn, Wallace B Wee, Ran D Goldman
PMCID: PMC12668421  PMID: 41285619

Abstract

Question

An 8-year-old child was seen in our clinic for shortness of breath and wheezing after running at school. He was clinically healthy with no other symptoms consistent with asthma. His parents read that in adults, salbutamol could be taken before exercise to prevent shortness of breath and wheezing, but were unsure whether this also applied to children. Is salbutamol safe and effective for preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in pediatric patients?

Answer

Effective management of EIB in children supports greater participation in physical activity, which is important for physical and emotional well-being. Pediatric studies found salbutamol is safe and effective for preventing EIB in children when administered 15 to 30 minutes before exercise. Children can develop a tolerance to salbutamol if used frequently; therefore, salbutamol should be used less than once per day to maintain effectiveness. If children require salbutamol more often, additional therapies to manage airway inflammation can be considered.


Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a transient narrowing of the lower airways that occurs during or after physical activity,1 and can occur in individuals with or without asthma.2 Approximately 9% of children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years experience EIB, with the average prevalence rising to 15% in athletes and 46% in those with asthma.2

While the pathophysiology is unknown, proposed mechanisms include the osmotic and thermal-vascular theories.3 Both are based on the physiological demands of exercise, which require a greater volume of inspired air to be humidified and warmed to body temperature. In the osmotic theory, water diffuses into the inspired air, increasing the airway-surface fluid osmolality and drawing fluid out of the epithelial cells. This leads to the production and release of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids (signalling molecules), histamines, and neurokinins, which promotes airway smooth muscle contraction and inflammation. In the thermal-vascular theory, EIB is thought to be due to rewarming of cool ambient air that initially causes airway vasoconstriction followed by vasodilation and airway edema.

Patients experiencing EIB may have shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing, and exercise limitations.3 If untreated, EIB can decrease performance during physical activity, limit participation in activities, and add to anxiety and emotional burden.4 Given the importance of physical activity for overall well-being, any barrier to participation is concerning. As such, adequate management of EIB is important to maintain an affected child’s quality of life.

Diagnostic workup

The criterion standard for diagnosing EIB is an exercise challenge test where the patient performs spirometry before and after the test to measure changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).1 A 10% to 15% decrease in FEV1 after exercising is considered a positive test result. Some guidelines suggest EIB severity may be correlated with the magnitude of the FEV1 decrease where a 10% to 25% FEV1 decrease is considered mild, a 25% to 50% decrease is moderate, and a decrease of greater than 50% is severe.1

Treatment of EIB

Inhaled salbutamol is considered first-line therapy for EIB.5 Salbutamol is a short-acting β2-agonist that promotes smooth muscle relaxation and bronchodilation. Salbutamol acts quickly (<5 minutes) and lasts for 4 to 6 hours.5 Salbutamol is typically taken before exercise via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer. The standard dose is 200 μg (2 puffs of the inhaler, 100 μg per puff).6

Several studies demonstrate the preventive effect of salbutamol for EIB in adults with mild to moderate asthma.7-11 A 2001 study included 27 adults aged 18 to 50 years, randomized into 3 treatment arms: salbutamol MDI, salbutamol dry powder inhaler (DPI), or placebo administered 30 minutes before exercise.7 Treatment with salbutamol MDI (mean [standard deviation (SD)] FEV1 decrease=8.5% [13.8%]) or salbutamol DPI (mean [SD] FEV1 decrease=13.4% [13.2%]) led to a smaller decrease in FEV1 compared to placebo (39.4% [17.6%], P<.01).

Among 10 athletes (mean age 20.9 years), mean (standard error of the mean) FEV1 decreased by 4% (5.2%) with inhaled salbutamol taken 15 minutes before exercise, compared to 14.3% (11.1%) with placebo (P<.05).8 In 24 adults aged 18 to 45 years, salbutamol MDI led to a mean decrease in FEV1 of 15.4%, contributing to greater prevention of EIB compared to placebo (mean FEV1 decrease=33.7%, P<.01).9

In a study of 12 adults aged 19 to 41 years with asthma, both salbutamol and formoterol, a long-acting β2-agonist, significantly mitigated the decrease in FEV1 2 hours after treatment compared to placebo (P<.01).10 The mean decrease in FEV1 was 14.1% with salbutamol, 7.7% with formoterol, and 32.7% with placebo.

Salbutamol was equally effective in preventing EIB when administered as a combination inhaler.11 In a sample of 60 adults with a mean age of 40.5 years, a single dose of salbutamol-budesonide MDI (180 μg and 160 μg, respectively) 30 minutes before performing 6 to 8 minutes of exercise on a treadmill at 80% to 95% of maximum heart rate resulted in a 5.5% reduction of FEV1 after exercise compared to a 19.0% reduction with placebo (P<.01).11

Research in children

The efficacy of salbutamol for EIB prophylaxis has been observed in the pediatric population.12-18 Five pediatric studies suggested good tolerability, with no adverse effects.6,7,14,17,18 Among 46 children aged 4 to 11 years with asthma, a 200-μg salbutamol MDI or DPI prevented EIB more than placebo (P<.01) when taken 15 minutes before exercise.12

Children treated with a salbutamol MDI or DPI experienced a 6% mean decrease in FEV1 following the exercise test, compared to a 23% decrease in the placebo group.12 An industry-sponsored study of 15 children aged 6 to 11 years with asthma found treatment with salbutamol MDI resulted in a mean (SD) FEV1 increase of 1.9% (16.4%) after exercise compared to a decrease of 25.5% (16.0%) with placebo (P<.01).13 Despite relatively small sample sizes, these results suggest salbutamol is an effective treatment for children experiencing EIB.

Several studies compared salbutamol with agents targeting the inflammatory components of EIB. A 1998 study found salbutamol and a salbutamol-nedocromil combination were both protective against EIB and better than placebo (P<.01) in 12 children with asthma aged 7 to 13 years.14 The mean (SD) decrease in FEV1 after exercise was 3.7% (4.4%) with salbutamol, 2.2% (2.7%) with the combination, and 25.7% (18.9%) with placebo. The proposed mechanism is that nedocromil stabilizes the mast cells, preventing release of molecules that lead to inflammation and bronchoconstriction during exercise.14 Further, salbutamol was better than a mast stabilizer (sodium cromoglycate) in an older study (P<.05).15

A study in the United States compared salbutamol and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in 11 children with asthma aged 7 to 17 years.16 A salbutamol MDI taken 15 minutes before exercise prevented EIB in all participants (mean [SD] FEV1 decrease=0.7% [1.6%]), compared to 5 to 10 mg montelukast capsules taken nightly for 3 to 7 days before the exercise test, which resulted in a larger FEV1 decrease (18.3% [13.7%], P<.01). These findings reinforce salbutamol’s effectiveness for pretreating EIB, suggesting direct salbutamol-mediated bronchodilation is more effective than targeting inflammatory pathways alone.

Other studies from the United States compared the effectiveness of salbutamol against a long-acting β2-agonist.17,18 A 1999 study using a small sample of 24 children aged 4 to 11 years with mild to moderate asthma found treatment with salbutamol led to a smaller decrease in FEV1 compared to placebo (mean [standard error (SE)] 3.8% [1.5%] vs 13.5% [2.6%], P<.01), and compared to both 25-μg (mean [SE] 5.4% [2.1%]) and 50-μg (mean [SE] 5.6% [2.3%]) doses of salmeterol (P<.03).17

An industry-sponsored study of 12 children aged 8 to 15 years with asthma found aerosol salbutamol prevented EIB (mean [SD] FEV1 decrease=18% [18%]) more than placebo (mean [SD] FEV1 decrease=44% [14%]) 30 minutes after exercise (P<.02).18 Twelve-microgram formoterol prevented EIB more than both placebo (P<.01) and salbutamol (P<.02). This evidence suggests both salbutamol and long-acting β2-agonists are effective for acute prevention of EIB. However, these studies predate regulatory guidance that now discourages long-acting β2-agonist monotherapy due to an increased risk of asthma-related death.19

Considering salbutamol in children

Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of taking 200 μg of salbutamol to prevent EIB in both pediatric and adult populations7-18; however, additional studies assessing different medication doses are required to determine an optimal dose. Current guidelines endorse taking 200 μg of salbutamol less than once per day, as frequent use may lead to downregulation of β2-adrenoceptors, reducing effectiveness for preventing EIB.1 In these pediatric trials, salbutamol failed to prevent EIB in up to 9% of participants,12 while others report rates as high as 20%.1 Patients who find salbutamol ineffective or require it more than once per day may consider supplementary therapy with a daily inhaled corticosteroid or other treatments addressing airway inflammation.1

Conclusion

Preventing EIB in children is important, and taking 200 μg of salbutamol before exercise is a safe and effective treatment option.

Child Health Update is produced by the Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) program (http://www.pretx.org) at the BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, BC. Connor L. Flynn and Dr Wallace B. Wee are members and Dr Ran D. Goldman is Director of the PRETx program. The mission of the PRETx program is to promote child health through evidence-based research in therapeutics in pediatric emergency medicine.

Footnotes

Competing interests

None declared

This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de novembre/décembre 2025 à la page e272 .

References

  • 1.Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, Kaminsky DA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013. May 1;187(9):1016-27. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0437ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Aguiar KB, Anzolin M, Zhang L.. Global prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in childhood: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018. Apr;53(4):412-25. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23951. Epub 2018 Jan 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pongdee T, Li JT.. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013. May;110(5):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aggarwal B, Mulgirigama A, Berend N.. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: prevalence, pathophysiology, patient impact, diagnosis and management. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018. Aug 14;28(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0098-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Billington CK, Penn RB, Hall IP.. β2-agonists. In: Page CP, Barnes PJ, editors. Pharmacology and therapeutics of asthma and COPD. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 237. Springer; 2016. p. 23-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) . 2024 global strategy for asthma management and prevention [Internet]. GINA; 2024. [cited 2025 Jul 30]. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GINA-2024-Strategy-Report-24_05_22_WMS.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anderson SD, Lambert S, Brannan JD, Wood RJ, et al. Laboratory protocol for exercise asthma to evaluate salbutamol given by two devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001. Jun;33(6):893-900. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.VanHaitsma TA, Mickleborough T, Stager JM, Koceja DM, et al. Comparative effects of caffeine and albuterol on the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise in asthmatic athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2010. Apr;31(4):231-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Erratum in: Int J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;31(6):439. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hawksworth RJ, Sykes AP, Faris M, Mant T, et al. Albuterol HFA is as effective as albuterol CFC in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002. May;88(5):473-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62385-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McAlpine LG, Thomson NC.. Prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist. Respir Med. 1990. Jul;84(4):293-5. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(08)80056-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.LaForce C, Chipps BE, Albers FC, Reilly L, et al. Albuterol/budesonide for the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma: The TYREE study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022. Feb;128(2):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bronsky EA, Spector SL, Pearlman DS, Justus SE, et al. Albuterol aerosol versus albuterol Rotacaps in exercise-induced bronchospasm in children. J Asthma. 1995;32(3):207-14. doi: 10.3109/02770909509089509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Colice GL, Klinger NM, Ekholm BP, Dockhorn RJ.. Proventil HFA prevents exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children. J Asthma. 1999. Dec;36(8):671-6. doi: 10.3109/02770909909055419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Benedictis FM, Tuteri G, Pazzelli P, Solinas LF, et al. Combination drug therapy for the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998. Apr;80(4):352-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62982-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Godfrey S, König P.. Inhibition of exercise-induced asthma by different pharmacological pathways. Thorax. 1976. Apr;31(2):137-43. doi: 10.1136/thx.31.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Raissy HH, Harkins M, Kelly F, Kelly HW.. Pretreatment with albuterol versus montelukast for exercise-induced bronchospasm in children. Pharmacotherapy. 2008. Mar;28(3):287-94. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blake K, Pearlman DS, Scott C, Wang Y, et al. Prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in pediatric asthma patients: a comparison of salmeterol powder with albuterol. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999. Feb;82(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62598-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Henriksen JM, Agertoft L, Pedersen S.. Protective effect and duration of action of inhaled formoterol and salbutamol on exercise-induced asthma in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992. Jun;89(6):1176-82. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90302-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.US Food and Drug Administration . Serevent Diskus (salmeterol xinafoate) inhalation powder: Prescribing Information [Internet]. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. [cited 2025 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/020692s047lbl.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES