Abstract
Background:
Desmoplakin (DSP) variants cause arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), a disorder characterized by myocardial fibrosis, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. DSP-mediated ACM often involves left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and myocardial inflammation, yet existing diagnostic criteria may underdetect disease, underscoring the need for population-based penetrance estimates.
Objective:
To assess the prevalence and phenotypic penetrance of DSP variants in a genotyped population.
Methods:
Among 200,580 UK Biobank participants with exome sequencing, DSP variants were classified as predicted-deleterious (pDel), predicted loss-of-function (pLOF), or ClinVar 2-star pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP). A subset of pDel carriers underwent ECG and CMR testing, matched to genotype-negative controls. Phenotypic penetrance was assessed using ICD-10 diagnoses, ECG, and CMR. Variant clustering within functional DSP domains was also evaluated.
Results:
Of 200,580 participants, 1407 (0.7%) carried a pDel, 168 (0.08%) a pLOF, and 44 (0.02%) a ClinVar 2* P/LP DSP variant. Myocarditis occurred in 0.28% of pDel, 1.8% of pLOF, and 4.5% of ClinVar P/LP carriers versus 0.07% of controls (p<0.05). Cardiomyopathy prevalence increased from 1.4% (pDel) to 5.4% (pLOF) and 6.8% (P/LP) versus 0.6% in controls (p<0.01). DSP carriers had more frequent lateral T-wave inversions and abnormal LV strain. Missense variants clustered within two functional DSP domains.
Conclusions:
DSP pDel variants are common but show low penetrance for myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, with risk increasing with more stringent classification. Electrocardiographic and strain abnormalities may aid early detection, supporting genotype-first approaches for DSP interpretation.
Keywords: Genetics, genomics, population, DSP, desmoplakin, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy
Introduction
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited myocardial disorder, characterized by ventricular arrhythmias, progressive systolic dysfunction, and sudden cardiac death1. ACM primarily stems from cardiac desmosomal abnormalities, leading to fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium, adverse myocardial remodeling, and fibrosis2. While ACM was initially characterized by predominant right ventricular dysfunction, recent evidence suggests that ACM may also present with primary LV or biventricular involvement3, 4. Recent evidence reports that genotype-specific therapeutic approaches are on the horizon which highlights the important role of genotype focused approach into the study of the natural history of ACM progression5.
Desmoplakin (DSP), a key desmosomal protein, is essential for cardiac force transmission and conduction by linking itself to intermediate filaments and other key proteins6, 7. Pathogenic DSP variants cause a distinctive ACM subtype8, characterized by lateral T-wave inversions, ventricular arrhythmias, and episodic myocardial injury which contributes to progressive fibrosis with preserved systolic dysfunction until late in the disease course9, 10. Unlike classic ARVC, DSP-mediated cardiomyopathy exhibits an inflammatory component, wherein episodes of myocardial injury occur in “hot phases” of inflammation, resembling myocarditis in overall disease progression10–12. Phenotypically, such “hot phases” clinically manifest with shortness of breath, chest pain, elevation in troponin, and electrocardiographic changes; Notably, there is even new evidence of potential progression of DSP-cardiomyopathy during endurance exercise likely due to increased risk of myocardial injury; And evidence of treatment of such inflammatory hot phases has shown improved arrhythmia and heart failure outcomes in this population13–16. Of note as DSP-cardiomyopathy can affect both ventricles and carries a high risk for heart failure and major arrhythmias, reported rates are less common in ALVC dominant subtype17, 18.
Given the distinct presentation of DSP-cardiomyopathy, traditional diagnostic criteria for ACM exhibit poor sensitivity and accuracy for DSP-carriers19, 20. Thus, there is a need to identify specific phenotypic markers associated with predicted deleterious (pDel) DSP variants. At the population level, timely identification of DSP carriers may offer a window of opportunity for interventions to reduce DSP-related arrhythmic outcomes. This study leverages the UK Biobank exome dataset to determine the frequency, penetrance, and phenotypic spectrum of DSP variants on a population-wide scale. We aimed to determine penetrance of pDel DSP variants and identify specific, easily accessible markers to help in early identification of DSP carriers at risk of disease progression.
Methods
Analyses were conducted in the UK Biobank (UKBB), with access provided under application number 48286. We restricted analysis to UKBB participants who underwent exome sequencing (ES) who provided written consent21. UKBB data are available to approved researchers upon application. We first assessed the ES cohort, with sub-cohorts defined by DSP-genotype category and completion of 12-lead ECG and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (Figure 1). An extensive variant and sample-level pipeline was applied to produce a high-quality dataset of DSP variants22–25. DSP variants were stratified into three variant-call groups based on variant type and pathogenicity class: Group-1 (pDel): Predicted deleterious variant (pDel) carriers with a predicted loss of function variant or missense variant with predicted-deleterious effects. Group-2 (pLOF): Predicted loss of function variant (pLOF) carriers, including splice-site variants, frameshift insertion/deletions, or early stop-gain mutations. Group-3 (ClinVar 2* P/LP): ultra-filtered subset of variants listed in ClinVar as P/LP with at least two-star evidence level (sFigure 1). A DSP-positive sub-cohort underwent 12-lead ECG and CMR diagnostic testing and compared with a matched wildtype control, genotype-negative for cardiomyopathy and ion channelopathy P/LP variants (G-)26,with full protocol available in eMethods27–36. DSP variants were analyzed by gene and amino-acid regions for predicting pathogenicity37–40. The research reported in this paper adhered to Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013 guidelines. Statistical analyses are described in eMethods.
Figure 1: Study methodology and variant sub-cohorts.

This is a flowchart that describes the process of identifying the study population, including inclusion and exclusion criteria and variant sub-cohorts. Created with biorender.com
Results
Study Population
Among 502,493 UKBB participants, 200,580 underwent ES (55.1% female, 56.5y at recruitment on average), 42,078 had 12 lead ECG, 39,616 underwent CMR. Cardiomyopathy (CM) was present in 1,192 (0.6%); dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in 489 (0.2%); myocarditis in 137 (0.07%); and heart failure (HF) in 6,326 (3.2%). Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) was present in 1,787 (0.9%) and atrial fibrillation/flutter in 13,883 (6.9%) (sTable 1).
Clinical Disease Penetrance of DSP Carriers in the UKBB
Among the 200,580 individuals with ES, 1407 (0.70%) were identified to carry a pDel variant; 168 (0.08%) with pLOF variants, and 44 (0.02%) with ClinVar 2* P/LP variants (Figure 1). Among 1407 pDel carriers, 19 (1.4%) individuals had a clinical diagnosis of cardiomyopathy; 9 (0.6%) with DCM; 4 (0.3%) with myocarditis; and 53 (3.8%) individuals had HF. Those with pDel DSP variants had a four-fold increase in myocarditis incidence compared to the rest of the DSP-negative UKBB population (0.28% compared to 0.07%; p value <0.05). The pDel DSP cohort also exhibited a higher prevalence of myocarditis, CM, and DCM. 1.4% of individuals had a clinical diagnosis of CM, with the risk of developing cardiomyopathy being two-fold (hazards ratio (HR) 2.33, p < 0.001). Among pDel DSP carriers, 0.28% had a clinical diagnosis of myocarditis, with the risk of developing myocarditis being four-fold (HR 4.30, p<0.005) by logistic regression analysis (sFigure 2, sTable 2), and no noted impact on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE) (sTable 3). Overall, these findings show that DSP variants are common in the general population, yet lead to a low penetrant risk of developing myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, and DCM.
Penetrance Analysis by Gene-Evidence Category
A subset of 168 individuals were identified to have a pLOF variant, defined by the presence of a stop-gain, frameshift insertion or deletion, or splice-site mutation. The pLOF group had a higher prevalence of CM, DCM, myocarditis, and HF (Figure 2). Among this pLOF group, 5.4% (n = 9) had a diagnosis of CM compared to the 0.6% (n=1,183) of the DSP-negative group (p<0.001). A similarly significant enrichment was noted in pLOF DSP carriers for DCM, wherein 3.6% (n=6) of pLOF DSP carriers had a DCM diagnosis, compared to 0.2% (n=483) of the DSP-negative population (p<0.001) (sTable 4). Notably, the pLOF group also had a significantly higher myocarditis burden compared to the DSP-negative population, with 1.8% (n=3) in the pLOF group versus 0.07% (n =134) in the DSP-negative population (p<0.001). An enrichment in HF was seen, with 6.5% (n=11) in the pLOF group compared to 3.2% (n=6,315) of the DSP-negative population (p<0.05). Further, enrichment of shortness of breath was noted in pLOF carriers compared to the DSP-negative group (p<0.05). The impact of pLOF variants on CM and myocarditis was significant, with an HR of 9.9 [95% CI 5.16–19.1; p <0.001] for CM and 28.3 [CI:9.01–88.9; p <0.001] for myocarditis by Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for sex (sTable 5). pLOF carriers were more likely to develop HF with an HR of 2.24 (p<0.01) (sTable 6).
Figure 2: Phenotypic penetrance and event-free survival of DSP-positive carriers identified by the presence of a pLOF mutation.

A. 5.4% (9/168) of the DSP-pos pLOF carriers were noted to have CM compared to 0.6% (1,183/200,412) of the DSP-neg population (p<0.001). B. 3.6% (6/168) of pLOF DSP carriers with DCM compared to 0.2% (483/200,412) of DSP-neg population (p<0.001). C. 1.8% (3/168) of pLOF carriers with myocarditis compared to 0.07% (134/200,412) of DSP-neg; (p<0.001). D. 6.5% (11/168) of the pLOF DSP carriers with HF compared to 0.2% (483/200,412) of DSP-neg population (p<0.05). E. Kaplan-Meier survival curve depicting time to CM diagnosis in pLOF DSP-pos carriers compared to DSP-neg individuals, noting pLOF carriers with significantly reduced event-free survival (p<0.001). F. Kaplan-Meier survival curve depicting time to myocarditis diagnosis in pLOF carriers compared to DSP-negative individuals, with significantly reduced event-free survival in DSP-pos pDel carriers (p<0.001).
A total of 44 individuals were identified to have ClinVar 2* P/LP variants. At this most stringent level for DSP variant filtering, we noted a significant enrichment in myocarditis and cardiomyopathy (sTable 7). A further marked increase in myocarditis was noted in the DSP-positive cohort (4.5%, n=2) when compared to the DSP-negative population (0.07%, n =135) (p<0.001). ClinVar 2* P/LP carriers thus had a 63.6-fold increased risk of developing myocarditis, with a HR of 63.6 [95% CI: 15.7–257; p<0.001] (sTable 8). Among ClinVar 2* P/LP carriers, 6.8% (n=3) had a CM diagnosis compared to 0.6% (n=1,189) of the DSP-negative group (p=0.002) (sFigure 3). with a 10-fold increased risk for developing CM [95% CI: 3.5–33.7; p< 0.01], with no significant impact on MACE outcomes noted in this smaller, ultra-filtered group (sTable 9). Overall, the penetrance of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy was noted to progressively increase by stringency of variant call method (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Progressively increasing myocarditis and cardiomyopathy enrichment in P/LP DSP variants by more stringent variant calling.

A. Myocarditis penetrance: 0.28% (4/1407) of pDel (p<0.05), 1.8% (3/168) of pLOF (p<0.001), 4.5% (2/44) of ClinVar 2* P/LP (p<0.001) with myocarditis vs 0.07% [133/199,173; 134/200,412; 135/200,536 respectively] of DSP-neg. B. Cardiomyopathy penetrance: 1.4% (19/1407) of pDel (p=0.001), 5.4% (9/168) of pLOF (p<0.001), 6.8% (3/44) of ClinVar 2* P/LP (p=0.002), with CM vs 0.6% [1173/199,173; 1,183/200,412; 1189/200,536 respectively] of DSP-neg.
Subclinical Disease Penetrance by ECG and CMR
Of the ES cohort, 488 individuals underwent both 12-Lead ECG and CMR (50.8% female; 56 years of age at recruitment). 122 pDel DSP carriers were compared against the matched genotype-negative control group (G-) comprising 366 individuals. VA was present in 5 (1.0%); atrial fibrillation in 28 (5.7%); HF in 12 (2.5%) of these individuals. Of 122 DSP carriers, 9.8% (n=12) had T-wave inversions (TWI) in the lateral-most lead, V6, compared to 4.8% (n=16) of the G- control (p <0.05) (Figure 4). No significant differences in repolarization abnormalities were noted in precordial, right-sided leads between the two groups.
Figure 4: Increased subclinical penetrance on 12-lead ECG and CMR in DSP-positive pDel carriers compared to matched genotype-negative control (G-).

A. Visual diagrammatic representation of ECG leads V1 and V6, in relation to the heart; with V1 providing the most right-sided precordial view and V6 placed laterally, as the left-most precordial lead, with T-inversion in V6 from likely pathogenic DSP carrier. B. 7.4% (9/122) of pDel DSP carriers with TWI in V1 compared to 7.1% (26/366) in the G- control group (p >0.1). 9.8% (12/122) of pDel DSP carriers in the subclinical cohort with T wave inversions in V6 compared to 4.4% (16/366) of the G- control. *p < 0.05. Created with biorender.com. C. 12.3% (15/122) of pDel DSP carriers with reduced peak global longitudinal strain vs 6.6% (24/366) in the G- (p <0.05). D. 4.9% (6/122) of pDel DSP carriers with reduced RVEDV vs 1.6% (6/366) in the G- (p <0.05). E. 11.5% (14/122) of pDel DSP carriers with reduced RV cardiac output vs 5.5% (20/366) in the G- (p <0.05). F. 8.2% (10/122) of pDel DSP carriers with reduced peak global longitudinal strain to 3.6% (13/366) in the G- (p <0.05).
CMR analysis demonstrated impaired mean radial left ventricular (LV) strain in the DSP-positive cohort compared to G-, with mean LV radial strain of 32.2 (± 5.8) in DSP-positive cohort and 33.5 (± 5.6) in G- (p<0.05). 12.3% (n=15) in the DSP-positive group were noted to have reduced peak global longitudinal strain, defined by <16%, with 12.3% compared to the 6.6% (n=24) in the G- control (p<0.05) (sTable 10). This occurred in the absence of any significant differences on T1 weighted CMR, LV ejection fraction (EF), end diastolic (EDV) and systolic volumes (ESV), stroke volume, and cardiac output between the two groups. CMR analysis of the right ventricle (RV) demonstrated an increased proportion of DSP-positive individuals with reduced RVEDV, RVESV, and RV cardiac output compared to the G- control, with 4.9% (6) versus 1.6% (6) with reduced RVEDV; 8.2% (10) versus 3.6% (13) with reduced RVESV; and 11.5% (14) versus 5.5% (20) with reduced RV cardiac output respectively (p<0.05). Subclinical phenotypic penetrance analysis thus indicates that DSP-carriers may have increased left-sided repolarization abnormalities and early signs of strain.
Variant Location and Mutational Hotspots
Given the association of DSP variants with a low penetrant cardiovascular phenotype, we next sought to determine whether the location of variant on the DSP gene or encoded amino acid (AA) sequence predicted pathogenicity or penetrance. The location of 168 pLOF DSP truncating variants was analyzed across three key gene regions categorized by degree to which truncating variants are prone to nonsense mediated decay (NMD) where phenotypically penetrant and non-penetrant pLOF DSP variants did not localize to a specific risk region (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Variant location as a predictor of pathogenicity.

A. Topology of the DSP gene by gene region designated by susceptibility to nonsense-mediated decay, displayed across major isoforms DSP I and II. B. Distinct DSP pLOF variants found in the UKBB across the 3 key gene regions. C. Key protein domains across the amino acid sequence of the desmoplakin protein. D. A plot of all missense DSP variants in the UKBB by amino acid position, with the blue lines signifying the P/LP missense variants with predicted deleterious effects, and grey lines denoting the missense variants that are benign, likely benign, and VUS’s without predicted deleterious effect. E. A plot of all missense DSP variants in the ClinVar database by amino acid position, with blue lines signifying the P/LP missense variants with predicted deleterious effects, and grey lines denoting the missense variants that are benign, likely benign, and VUS’s without predicted deleterious effect. F. A stacked bar graph noting the distribution of P/LP and non-P/LP missense variants in DSP in the UKBB by location, with a higher proportion of P/LP variants in the hotspots compared to non-P/LP variants (p<0.01). G. A stacked bar graph demonstrating a similar distribution with a higher proportion of P/LP DSP missense variants in hotspots compared to non-P/LP missense DSP variants in an independent pool of missense DSP variants from ClinVar (p<0.05).
In leveraging the previously published signal-to-noise tool, DiscoVari, to investigate the 1200 missense variants in DSP in the UKBB, noting a higher proportion of P/LP missense variants to fall in DiscoVari hotspots when indexed for AA sequence length compared to outside hotspots, with 451 P/LP variants falling in the 2 DiscoVari regions collectively spanning 887 amino acids in length compared to the 749 P/LP variants in the collective 1984 amino acid long area outside of the two DiscoVari hotspots (p<0.001). The DiscoVari regions corresponded to specific regions in key binding domains in the desmoplakin protein: PKP1/JUP/PKP2 binding domain (1–584) and the intermediate filament binding domain (1946–2871). The population-first findings of missense variant distribution in the UKBB in conjunction with DiscoVari signals and major binding domains in the desmoplakin protein were then leveraged to define key novel mutational hotspots as spanning amino-acid positions 1–784 and 1946–2871. A far higher proportion of P/LP missense variants [74.3% (n=892)] were found in these newly defined mutational hotspots compared to 50% (n=6062) of non-P/LP missense variants in the UKBB (p<0.001). The distribution P/LP and non-P/LP missense variants was further validated on an independent external variant database, ClinVar, which comprised a total of 21 P/LP DSP missense variants by ClinVar 2-star criteria and 1971 non-P/LP missense variants, where 85.7% (n=18) of ClinVar P/LP missense variants were found in the novel hotspots, compared to 62.1% (n=1225) of non-P/LP missenses. P/LP DSP missense variants in ClinVar were found to 3.7 times more likely to be in the novel hotspots compared to non-P/LP (p<0.05). The missense variant distribution in both the UKBB and ClinVar databases indicate that these mutational hotspots (1–784 and 1946–2871) hold a higher burden of P/LP missense DSP variants, indicating predictive value of location for variant pathogenicity.
Discussion
Given the distinct presentation of DSP-associated ACM from the conventional ACM phenotype, there is a pressing need to better understand DSP mediated disease, as existing risk-stratification and diagnostic criteria currently used for ACM have poor sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for DSP-carriers41. Our study stands as the first, large-scale, population-based analysis that provides insights into the clinical and subclinical penetrance of DSP-associated pDel variants, revealing several key findings with significant clinical implications; notably this is reported in the UKBB which reports results in older individuals by design.
First, our data indicates an overall prevalence of individuals with pDel DSP variants to be 0.7% in the UKBB population which consists primarily of middle-aged adults, with pLOF and ClinVar 2* P/LP carriers being less common in the population. Second, a significant enhancement in penetrance of ACM-associated cardiac phenotypes including CM, DCM, HF, and myocarditis was observed in the pLOF DSP-positive cohort. Third, while overall cardiovascular penetrance of DSP variants was low, there was a progressively increasing enhancement with increasing stringency of variant call method.
Most notably, a markedly elevated proportion of individuals in all DSP-positive cohorts was found to have myocarditis compared to the DSP-negative population. Through increasingly stringent criteria for variant pathogenicity call, enhancement in the myocarditis signal in the DSP-positive group increased by 25-fold and by over 60-fold, respectively, compared to the DSP-negative population. A similar progressively enhancing penetrance was seen with cardiomyopathy. This suggests that variant type (pLOF vs pDel missenses) as well as ClinVar designation could offer higher predictive value in terms of risk of myocardial injury-related hot phases, or myocarditis, a known part of the DSP-mediated disease progression. More importantly, these results suggest that individuals at the population level who confer DSP variants are predisposed to DSP-CM related phenotypic manifestations well characterized in clinical cohorts. Thus, identification of DSP variants as a secondary or incidental finding should prompt clinical counseling and evaluation for not only cardiac manifestations, but also regarding past episodes of myocarditis and myocardial injury, which in turn might represent factors predisposing to disease progression41–44. One notable detail from the results of this study is the increased penetrance of cardiomyopathy and myocarditis in ClinVar only sub cohort compared to the predicated deleterious sub cohort which implies that not all variants confer the same risk profile which can in theory help risk stratify individuals at further risk to develop disease that will be relevant to young carriers that might be interested in pursing athletic activities that may exacerbates an already elevated risk profile, this will certainly require more research before clear recommendation can be offered in clinical settings45.
ECG findings in the 122 pDel cohort revealed a significantly increased proportion of individuals with TWI in lead V6 compared to the G- control. The well-established revised 2010 International Task Force Criteria clearly include negative T-waves in right-sided precordial leads as a specific minor criterion for diagnosing ARVC46. T-wave abnormalities in lateral ECG leads indicative of LV involvement are common in DSP-disease cohorts47. Yet, this often goes under-recognized given lateral-lead repolarization changes do not constitute a diagnostic or risk factor criterion for conventional ACM48. Thus, this repolarization change in the lateral-most ECG lead in the DSP-positive group without concurrent changes in the anterior precordial leads demonstrates a left-dominant presentation of DSP-mediated ACM at a population level49. While there is clear consensus that the genetic basis of ACM must be considered to better predict disease progression50, lateral lead (V6) TWI, particularly in the absence of right-sided repolarization abnormalities in the DSP-positive population may offer value in being an early risk-predictor at a population-level.
CMR analysis demonstrates that DSP carriers can show early signs of myocardial injury measured by worsening mean longitudinal and radial LV strain in the absence of significant differences in LV volumes and function, with prior studies illustrating that worsening left heart strain may be an early marker of progression to systolic dysfunction51–53. The increased proportion of DSP carriers with reduced RV volumes and cardiac output compared to G- supports that DSP-mediated disease has biventricular involvement, with no significant difference in EF and function indicating likely early disease. More recently there has been work that further explores the clinical outcomes and morphological markers of DSP-cardiomyopathy with integrated new risk scores that aim to risk stratify arrhythmic risk in these cohorts that are aim to arrive to similar landscape compared to the results presented in this work.54, 55
Analyzing pDel missense and pLOF variants by location represents the first large population-wide analysis for location-related predictors for pathogenicity by gene region and amino acid sequence. Our study ultimately validates that DiscoVari-identified mutational regions, and more broadly, the PKP/JUP and intermediate filament binding domains in desmoplakin, hold enrichment of P/LP missense variants compared to non-hotspot regions, ultimately making it possible to define key mutational hotspots based on these findings in the UKBB which were validated by an additional, independent variant database. Given loss of function is the key mechanism for DSP-mediated disease, it is crucial to be able to interpret risk of pDel variants and further characterize pathogenicity risk in missense variants56. A prior study found that variant location by gene region prone to NMD was a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmia in an enriched population of truncating variants in DSP with diagnosed ACM38. However, in a population-first approach of pLOF DSP variants with an already low penetrance of phenotypic manifestations, this effect was muted. The DiscoVari-identified pathogenic hotspots and the key functional binding domains for the desmoplakin protein noted increased clustering of P/LP missense variants, demonstrating the functional relevance of variant location to predicted pathogenicity. P/LP DSP missense variant clustering was noted to follow a similar pattern in an independent missense-variant-repository, further validating missense variant location may be predictive of pathogenicity. This aligns with similar works that identifies variant location as a novel risk factor for DSP associated ARVC; The type and location of said variants was also associated with HF and arrhythmic outcomes.38, 57
The current standard of risk stratification and diagnostic criteria for individuals with ACM is based on the modified international task force criteria, which holds poor sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for DSP mediated disease48. Phenotypic penetrance and genotype status assessed at this population-wide level gives us further insight into DSP-mediated disease and helps us better identify genotype-positive individuals who are at greater risk for disease. Our phenotype association studies demonstrate that individuals with pLOF variants are at greater risk for penetrant disease. Among missense variants, those that fall into mutational hotspots are more likely to be P/LP. Additionally, early subclinical markers in the setting of low-penetrant disease among DSP-carriers including left-sided repolarization abnormalities and reduced strain – i.e. left sided structural and electrophysiological findings may have the potential to better identify at-risk DSP carriers in the population. Taken together, our findings provide insight into DSP-mediated ACM at a large population level and highlight the need for updated risk stratification and diagnostic criteria for DSP carriers. Future endeavors with emphasis on data interoperability between different cohorts and biobanks while studying genetic-specific presentation in cardiomyopathy will be crucial moving forward.58, 59
Limitations
The study results should be interpreted considering the following limitations. First, the larger clinical analysis of the 1407-individual DSP-positive pDel cohort is primarily based on ICD-10 diagnoses. While this approach is routinely used in population-based research, the absence of a specific diagnoses code for ACM, may have possibly contributed to the under-recognition of cardiac phenotype penetrance60. Second, the UKBB does not include recruits under 40 years-of-age, which may contribute towards underestimating severe disease, as this may exclude the younger ACM population with more severe disease and sudden cardiac death61, 62. Ethical considerations posed by the observational nature of the UKBB study precludes the use of contrast or stress agents, and thus limited CMR analysis from including gadolinium enhancement for myocardial tissue characterization63.
Conclusions
While pDel DSP variants are relatively common in the general population, its overall clinical penetrance of cardiomyopathy and myocarditis is low. A higher proportion of individuals with DSP variants were noted to have myocarditis compared to the DSP-negative population, indicating susceptibility to a pro-inflammatory state in DSP-mediated disease. Left-sided repolarization abnormalities on ECG and worsening LV strain on CMR in the absence of overt systolic dysfunction are specific and early signs of disease involvement in the DSP-positive population that may hold value in being applied as early diagnostic markers and risk predictors of DSP-associated cardiomyopathy. Finally, the location of missense DSP variants by amino-acid sequence and mutational hotspot analysis can provide informative guidance on the pathogenicity of DSP variants.
Supplementary Material
Key Points.
What is known?
DSP variants are a well-established cause of ACM; however, traditional diagnostic criteria may underrecognize DSP-mediated cardiomyopathy and there is the need for genotype-specific guidance to better inform on early and accurate recognition of DSP-mediated disease. Prior studies have focused on large clinical cohorts, but a population-first approach to assess clinical and subclinical penetrance of DSP carriers has not been done yet.
What this study adds:
This study shows that there is progressive enrichment in clinical penetrance of DSP carriers by stringency of variant call for pathogenicity, with early left-sided phenotypic signs noted on ECG and CMR. This study also identifies mutational hotspots enriched for pathogenic missense variants, providing new insights into genotype-phenotype associations. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of a genotype-first approach for ACM, as identification of DSP variants as a secondary or incidental finding should prompt clinical counseling and longitudinal evaluation for distinct genotype-specific cardiac manifestations such as myocarditis.
Acknowledgements:
Funding/Support:
This work was supported by the NIAID SCI-StaRR R38 Research Pathway, the National Institutes of Health (grants R01-HL160654 and R01-HL166217), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (CSDA-2020098), the John Taylor Babbitt Foundation, The Hartwell Foundation, Additional Ventures, the Y.T. Alice Chen Pediatric Genetics and Genomics Research Center, and the Duke University School of Medicine. Additionally, Dr. Anwar Chahal’s work has been supported by the NextGen project, which has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon Europe, under grant agreement no. 101136961. The British associated partners of NextGen were funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government’s Horizon Europe funding guarantee (grant agreements no. 10098097 and no. 10104323). This work has additionally received support from the Swiss Confederation, Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER), State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). Kerrick Hesse was supported by a British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship no FS/CRTF/23/24428.
Abbreviations
- AA
Amino Acid
- CMR
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
- CM
Cardiomyopathy
- ES
Exome Sequencing
- G-
Genotype-Negative Control Group
- MACE
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
- NMD
Nonsense-Mediated Decay
- P/LP
Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic
- pDel
Predicted Deleterious
- pLOF
Predicted Loss-of-Function
- REVEL
Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner
- TWI
T-wave Inversion
- UKBB
UK Biobank
- VA
Ventricular Arrhythmia
- VUS
Variant of Uncertain Significance
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References:
- 1.Basso C, Thiene G, Corrado D, et al. Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1996;94:983–991 DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.5.983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Asatryan B, Asimaki A, Landstrom AP, et al. Inflammation and Immune Response in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review. Circulation Nov 16 2021;144:1646–1655 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Norman M, Simpson M, Mogensen J, et al. Novel Mutation in Desmoplakin Causes Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2005;112:636–642 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.532234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, Ward D, et al. Clinical and Genetic Characterization of Families With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy Provides Novel Insights Into Patterns of Disease Expression. Circulation 2007;115:1710–1720 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.660241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Muller SA, Bertoli G, Wang J, et al. Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Towards Genotype Based Diagnoses and Management. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Dec 2 2024. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yuan ZY, Cheng LT, Wang ZF, Wu YQ. Desmoplakin and clinical manifestations of desmoplakin cardiomyopathy. Chin Med J (Engl) Aug 2 2021;134:1771–1779 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Green KJ, Stappenbeck TS, Parry DA, Virata ML. Structure of desmoplakin and its association with intermediate filaments. J Dermatol Nov 1992;19:765–769 DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1992.tb03777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.López-Ayala JM, Gómez-Milanés I, Sánchez Muñoz JJ, et al. Desmoplakin truncations and arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy: characterizing a phenotype. EP Europace 2014;16:1838–1846 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reichl K, Kreykes SE, Martin CM, Shenoy C. <i>Desmoplakin</i> Variant-Associated Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Presenting as Acute Myocarditis. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine 2018;11:e002373 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith ED, Lakdawala NK, Papoutsidakis N, et al. Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy, a Fibrotic and Inflammatory Form of Cardiomyopathy Distinct From Typical Dilated or Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2020;141:1872–1884 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thiene G, Basso C, Pilichou K, Bueno Marinas M. Desmosomal Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: The Story Telling of a Genetically Determined Heart Muscle Disease. Biomedicines Jul 18 2023;11: DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11072018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bauce B, Basso C, Rampazzo A, et al. Clinical profile of four families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy caused by dominant desmoplakin mutations. Eur Heart J Aug 2005;26:1666–1675 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Corrado D, Perazzolo Marra M, Zorzi A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: The Padua criteria. Int J Cardiol Nov 15 2020;319:106–114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Calò L, Oliviero G, Crescenzi C, et al. Electrocardiogram in arrhytmogenic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Suppl May 2023;25:C169–c172 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacobsen AP, Chiampas K, Muller SA, et al. Endurance exercise promotes episodes of myocardial injury in individuals with a pathogenic desmoplakin (DSP) variant. Heart Rhythm Dec 30 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gasperetti A, Muller SA, Peretto G, et al. Prognostic Role of Myocarditis-Like Episodes and Their Treatment in Patients With Pathogenic Desmoplakin Variants. Circulation Oct 7 2025;152:978–989 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.125.073919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bariani R, Cason M, Rigato I, et al. Clinical profile and long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients with desmoplakin cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm Aug 2022;19:1315–1324 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang W, Murray B, Tichnell C, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk stratification of desmoplakin cardiomyopathy. Europace Feb 2 2022;24:268–277 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.James CA, Jongbloed JDH, Hershberger RE, et al. International Evidence Based Reappraisal of Genes Associated With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Using the Clinical Genome Resource Framework. Circ Genom Precis Med Jun 2021;14:e003273 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.120.003273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Corrado D, Zorzi A, Cipriani A, et al. Evolving Diagnostic Criteria for Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc Sep 21 2021;10:e021987 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.021987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Szustakowski JD, Balasubramanian S, Kvikstad E, et al. Advancing human genetics research and drug discovery through exome sequencing of the UK Biobank. Nat Genet Jul 2021;53:942–948 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00885-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res Sep 2010;38:e164 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, et al. REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants. Am J Hum Genet Oct 6 2016;99:877–885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Asatryan B, Shah RA, Dabbagh GS, et al. Predicted Deleterious Variants in Cardiomyopathy Genes Prognosticate Mortality and Composite Outcomes in the UK Biobank. JACC: Heart Failure 2024;12:918–932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature May 2020;581:434–443 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, et al. ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in Medicine 2022/06/17/ 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shah RA, Asatryan B, Sharaf Dabbagh G, et al. Frequency, Penetrance, and Variable Expressivity of Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Associated Putative Pathogenic Gene Variants in UK Biobank Participants. Circulation Jul 12 2022;146:110–124 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med Mar 2015;12:e1001779 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol Mar 13 2007;49:1128–1135 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou X, Ding H, Wu W, Zhang Y. A Real-Time Atrial Fibrillation Detection Algorithm Based on the Instantaneous State of Heart Rate. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136544 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Müller C, Hengstmann U, Fuchs M, et al. Distinguishing atrial fibrillation from sinus rhythm using commercial pulse detection systems: The non-interventional BAYathlon study. Digit Health Jan-Dec 2021;7:20552076211019620 DOI: 10.1177/20552076211019620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Petersen SE, Matthews PM, Francis JM, et al. UK Biobank's cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Feb 1 2016;18:8 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kawel-Boehm N, Hetzel SJ, Ambale-Venkatesh B, et al. Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Dec 14 2020;22:87 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00683-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Aragam KG, Chaffin M, Levinson RT, et al. Phenotypic Refinement of Heart Failure in a National Biobank Facilitates Genetic Discovery. Circulation Jan 22 2019;139:489–501 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khurshid S, Choi SH, Weng LC, et al. Frequency of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities in a Half Million Adults. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Jul 2018;11:e006273 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet Sep 2018;50:1219–1224 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kurzlechner LM, Kishnani S, Chowdhury S, et al. DiscoVari: A Web-Based Precision Medicine Tool for Predicting Variant Pathogenicity in Cardiomyopathy- and Channelopathy-Associated Genes. Circ Genom Precis Med Aug 2023;16:317–327 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.122.003911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoorntje ET, Burns C, Marsili L, et al. Variant Location Is a Novel Risk Factor for Individuals With Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Due to a Desmoplakin (DSP) Truncating Variant. Circ Genom Precis Med Feb 2023;16:e003672 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Consortium TU. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research 2022;51:D523–D531 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kurzlechner LM, Jones EG, Berkman AM, et al. Signal-to-Noise Analysis Can Inform the Likelihood That Incidentally Identified Variants in Sarcomeric Genes Are Associated with Pediatric Cardiomyopathy. J Pers Med Apr 30 2022;12: DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation Apr 6 2010;121:1533–1541 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.840827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yao J, Peters S, Datta R, et al. DSP Gene Mutation – A Cause of Recurrent Myocarditis: A Case Series. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2022;31:S240–S241 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.677. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Landstrom AP, Chahal AA, Ackerman MJ, et al. Interpreting Incidentally Identified Variants in Genes Associated With Heritable Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Genom Precis Med Apr 2023;16:e000092 DOI: 10.1161/HCG.0000000000000092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reichl K, Kreykes SE, Martin CM, Shenoy C. Desmoplakin Variant-Associated Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Presenting as Acute Myocarditis. Circ Genom Precis Med Dec 2018;11:e002373 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.118.002373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Choi NH, Cherny S, Berul CI, et al. Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy in Pediatric Patients: A Distinct, Underrecognized Cohort of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Nov 2024;17:e013114 DOI: 10.1161/circep.124.013114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia. Circulation 2010;121:1533–1541 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, Prasad SK, et al. Left-Dominant Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008;52:2175–2187 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Towbin JA, McKenna WJ, Abrams DJ, et al. 2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary. Heart Rhythm Nov 2019;16:e373–e407 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Calò L, Oliviero G, Crescenzi C, et al. Electrocardiogram in arrhytmogenic cardiomyopathy. European Heart Journal Supplements 2023;25:C169–C172 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xu Z, Zhu W, Wang C, et al. Genotype-phenotype relationship in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy caused by desmosomal gene mutations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 2017/01/25 2017;7:41387 DOI: 10.1038/srep41387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bernhard B, Tanner G, Garachemani D, et al. Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with suspected myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Aug 17 2023;25:49 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00957-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bourfiss M, Prakken NHJ, James CA, et al. Prognostic value of strain by feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Dec 19 2022;24:98–107 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brady B, King G, Murphy RT, Walsh D. Myocardial strain: a clinical review. Ir J Med Sci Aug 2023;192:1649–1656 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03210-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carrick RT, Gasperetti A, Protonotarios A, et al. A novel tool for arrhythmic risk stratification in desmoplakin gene variant carriers. Eur Heart J Aug 21 2024;45:2968–2979 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gasperetti A, Carrick RT, Protonotarios A, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in carriers of pathogenic desmoplakin variants. Eur Heart J Jan 21 2025;46:362–376 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vimalanathan AK, Ehler E, Gehmlich K. Genetics of and pathogenic mechanisms in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Biophys Rev Aug 2018;10:973–982 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-018-0437-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pergola V, Trancuccio A, Kukavica D, et al. Genotype-Specific Outcomes of Desmosomal Cardiomyopathies. Circulation Jul 29 2025;152:233–245 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.124.073475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Asatryan B, Murray B, Tadros R, et al. Promise and Peril of a Genotype-First Approach to Mendelian Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc Nov 5 2024;13:e033557 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.033557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shetty NS, Pampana A, Gaonkar M, et al. Association of Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Genetic Variants for Cardiomyopathies With Clinical Outcomes: A Multiancestry Analysis in the All of Us Research Program. Circ Genom Precis Med Jun 2025;18:e005113 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.124.005113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cozzolino F, Montedori A, Abraha I, et al. A diagnostic accuracy study validating cardiovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project. PLoS One 2019;14:e0218919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bhonsale A, Groeneweg JA, James CA, et al. Impact of genotype on clinical course in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated mutation carriers. Eur Heart J Apr 7 2015;36:847–855 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schoeler T, Speed D, Porcu E, et al. Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses. Nature Human Behaviour 2023/07/01 2023;7:1216–1227 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kuruvilla S, Adenaw N, Katwal AB, et al. Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2014;7:250–258 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
