Skip to main content
Intractable & Rare Diseases Research logoLink to Intractable & Rare Diseases Research
. 2025 Nov 30;14(4):258–265. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2025.01080

Advances in research on congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases: From molecular mechanisms to precision medicine

Lichao Yang 1,2, Yu Wang 3, Lianwen Yuan 1, Wei Tang 2,*
PMCID: PMC12672147  PMID: 41341909

Summary

Congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases are a group of major disorders caused by gene mutations or embryonic developmental anomalies and are characterized by diverse clinical manifestations and complex management. This review systematically explores the molecular genetic basis and pathogenic mechanisms of common intestinal diseases, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), Lynch syndrome (LS), Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), congenital short bowel syndrome (SBS), and cystic fibrosis (CF). It focuses on cross-disease commonalities in translational research frontiers such as gene-environment interactions, organoid-based precision medicine, the immune microenvironment, and metabolic and microbiome remodeling. The review also forecasts future directions, including gene therapy, targeted drugs, and other cutting-edge research advances.

Keywords: congenital intestinal diseases, hereditary gastrointestinal disorders, precision medicine, organoid models

1. Introduction

Congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases are key categories of conditions affecting human digestive health, and they are often closely related to key gene mutations, embryonic developmental abnormalities, or metabolic dysregulation (1). "Congenital" diseases typically refer to anatomical or functional abnormalities present at birth, stemming from disturbances during embryonic development. In contrast, "hereditary" diseases refer to pathological states caused by genetic material alterations (e.g., DNA sequence mutations and chromosomal rearrangements) that may manifest at birth or later in life. Although distinct in definition, these two categories often overlap in clinical practice — some diseases have a clear genetic basis and also present clinical manifestations at birth. For instance, hereditary precancerous conditions caused by high-penetrance mutations, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and Lynch syndrome (LS) (2), typically develop in adolescence or early adulthood. In contrast, Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) and congenital short bowel syndrome (SBS) often present as structural or functional abnormalities in the neonatal period (3).

These diseases impact patients' lives long term and impose a psychological burden on patients and their families (4). On one hand, some diseases have high morbidity or mortality rates; on the other hand, their heterogeneity and complexity lead to difficulties in diagnosis, limited treatment options, and a long-term reliance on comprehensive medical interventions. Therefore, in-depth analysis of the molecular pathogenesis of these common congenital/hereditary intestinal diseases not only aids in understanding their pathophysiological basis but also provides theoretical support for developing precise diagnostic tools and targeted therapeutic strategies.

2. Disease-specific mechanisms

2.1. Hereditary polyposis and cancer syndromes

2.1.1. FAP

FAP is an autosomal dominant syndrome driven by germline mutations in the APC gene, with its core pathogenic mechanism being constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (5). Recent studies have shown that APC truncation mutants can mediate aberrant overexpression of METTL3, which impairs tumor immune surveillance by m6A methylation of HIF1α mRNA (6). Upregulation of translation control factors like eIF3a is considered an important cooperative mechanism for sustained Wnt pathway activation in FAP, suggesting the therapeutic potential for interventions at the translational level (7). More importantly, research has confirmed that morphologically normal colon epithelium in FAP patients already exhibits metabolic reprogramming and monoclonal evolution, revealing the early basis for intestinal field cancerization and the widespread tendency for carcinogenesis (8). Epigenetic analyses have further confirmed that although DNA methylation changes are subtler compared to LS, genome-wide methylation dynamics are still an integral part of FAP tumorigenesis (9). These findings not only deepen the understanding of FAP carcinogenesis initiation but also highlight the value of epigenetic drugs and immunotherapy as potential combination strategies.

2.1.2. PJS

PJS is caused by germline mutations in the STK11/ LKB1 gene, with its molecular pathological core being dysregulation of the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway and loss of apicobasal cell polarity (10) . The LKB1 protein encoded by STK11 is a key upstream activator of AMP kinase; its functional inactivation releases inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway, aberrantly promoting cell growth. The latest research has revealed its downstream effects, including activation of the CRTC2-IL-17 signaling axis and overexpression of interleukin-11 in polyp-specific fibroblasts, providing potential new targets for targeted therapy (11,12).

2.1.3. LS

LS is a high-penetrance autosomal-dominant, hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. Its molecular basis lies in germline mutations in key DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system genes (13). An MMR functional deficiency leads to a Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) state, accompanied by extensive DNA methylation changes, collectively driving tumorigenesis (9,14). Research on its pathogenic network has expanded to broader aspects, including potential lipid metabolism dysregulation triggered by MLH1 variants (15), epigenetic reprogramming by the histone methyltransferase EZH2 suppressing anti-tumor immunity (16), and the potential promoting role of specific gut microbes in colorectal cancer development (17). The molecular mechanism of LS is no longer limited to mutation accumulation mediated by dMMR, but presents a more complex collaborative pathological network across dimensions like epigenetics, metabolic rewiring, and gut microbiota.

2.2. Congenital intestinal structural/Neurodevelopmental abnormalities

2.2.1. HSCR

The primary cause of HSCR is the impaired migration, proliferation, or differentiation of enteric neural crest cells (ENCCs) during embryogenesis. Besides RET as the main causative gene (18), genome-wide association studies have identified multiple susceptibility loci including JAG1 and HAND2 (19). At the molecular level, secretagogin affects ENCC migration via Lymphoid Enhancer Factor-1 (20), while the histone methyltransferase SMYD2 regulates cell behavior by modulating METTL3 expression affecting m6A methylation levels, revealing the important role of epigenetic regulation in HSCR (21).

2.2.2. SBS

Congenital SBS can be caused by mutations in genes regulating intestinal development, such as FOXF1 associated with intestinal malrotation, and CLMP and FLNA, which are closely related to intestinal length development (22). Recent studies have found that defects in the immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion protein CLMP and the smooth muscle cell proliferation key regulator SNRK are the genetic basis for a human congenital SBS-like pathology (23).

2.3. CF

CF is caused by mutations in the CFTR gene. Its core pathophysiology is defective chloride channel function leading to impaired epithelial ion transport and thickened mucus (24,25). In the intestinal system, besides mechanical obstruction, activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in inflammatory cells produces excess nitric oxide, slowing intestinal motility and contributing to ileus (26). Due to the disease's characteristics, patients often have genotype-associated intestinal inflammation (27). Table 1 systematically summarizes the key genes, core mechanisms, clinical management, and research frontiers for these six major congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases.

Table 1. Comparative summary of congenital and hereditary intestinal disorders: From genes to clinical translation.

Disease Key Gene(s) Core Pathogenic Mechanism Main Clinical Manifestations Diagnostic Methods Clinical Management Research Hotspots & Advances Ref.
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) APC Constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation. Hundreds to thousands of colorectal adenomas, inevitable progression to CRC; elevated risk of duodenal/thyroid cancer. Colonoscopy, APC genetic testing, upper endoscopy surveillance. Prophylactic colectomy (IRA/ IPAA); lifelong endoscopic surveillance. Interception Therapy : Wnt inhibitors (PORCNi), APC vaccines, chemopreventive agents (HAMSB). (5,45)
Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) STK11/LKB1 Dysregulation of AMPK/mTOR pathway and loss of cell polarity, leading to hamartomatous polyp formation. GI hamartomatous polyps, mucocutaneous pigmentation; high risk of intussusception; significantly increased cancer risk in multiple organs. Clinical criteria, STK11 genetic testing, video capsule endoscopy/enteroscopy. Endoscopic polypectomy to prevent intussusception; multi-system cancer screening. Targeted Therapy: mTOR inhibitors (e.g., Everolimus), IL-11 inhibitors; gut microbiota-metabolite modulation. (11,12)
Lynch Syndrome (LS) MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 Defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), resulting in Microsatellite Instability- High (MSI-H) and accelerated tumorigenesis. Early-onset colorectal cancer; high risk of extracolonic cancers (endometrial, gastric, urothelial, etc.). Tumor MMR protein IHC, MSI testing, germline genetic testing. Personalized colonoscopy surveillance; prophylactic surgery; genetic counseling and family testing. Precision Immunotherapy: PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitors; Prevention: Neoantigen vaccines. (39,40)
Hirschsprung Disease (HSCR) RET Impaired migration , proliferation, or differentiation of enteric neural crest cells, leading to aganglionosis in the distal gut. Functional intestinal obstruction in neonates , abdominal distension, constipation; can be complicated by HAEC. Rectal suction biopsy, contrast enema, RET genetic testing. Surgical resection of the aganglionic segment (e.g., Swenson, Duhamel procedures). Regenerative Medicine: Stem cell/enteric neural crest cell transplantation; Complication Management: HAEC mechanism research, 5-HT agonists. (18,19)
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) CLMP Massive intestinal resection or congenital maldevelopment, resulting in critically reduced absorptive surface area. Severe diarrhea, steatorrhea, malnutrition, dependence on parenteral nutrition (PN). Clinical presentation, imaging, surgical history, nutritional assessment. Enteral/parenteral nutrition support, dietary management. Enhancing Intestinal Adaptation: GLP-2 analogs (Teduglutide, Glepaglutide); Surgical Innovation: STEP / LILT procedures ; Regenerative Medicine: Organoid transplantation. (22,23)
Cystic Fibrosis (CF) CFTR Dysfunctional CFTR chloride channel, leading to thick, dehydrated secretions and ductal obstructions. Chronic lung disease, pancreatic insufficiency (steatorrhea), meconium ileus, malnutrition. Sweat chloride test, CFTR genetic testing, newborn screening. Lifelong multidisciplinary care (pulmonary, GI , nutrition); pancreatic enzyme replacement. CFTR Modulator Therapy : Correctors/potentiators (e.g., ETI triple therapy); Personalized Prediction: Organoid-based drug testing (FIS assay). (24,25)

3. Common translational frontiers and precision medicine platforms

3.1. Organoid models and precision medicine

Patient-derived intestinal organoid models provide a revolutionary platform for disease research and individualized therapy. In CF, the forskolin-induced swelling (FIS) assay based on organoids allows precise characterization of CFTR function and effectively predicts patient response to modulators (28,29). In FAP, these organoids can be used to model tumorigenesis processes and screen intervention strategies (30-32). For SBS, preclinical studies have confirmed that transplantation of ileum-derived organoids into the colon can restore absorptive function, providing proof-of-concept for regenerative medicine (33).

3.2. Microbiome and metabolic remodeling

The gut microbiome and its metabolites play crucial roles in disease progression. PJS patients exhibit gut microbiota dysbiosis characterized by enrichment of Veillonellaceae bacteria and reduced synthesis of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs); levels of these metabolites negatively correlate with polyp burden (34,35). In LS, colibactin-producing Escherichia coli is associated with the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and adenoma development (17). Moreover, the gut microbiota remodeling effects demonstrated by CFTR modulators and GLP-2 analogs in treating their respective diseases suggest the therapeutic potential of microecological intervention (36,37). Figure 1 illustrates the complex interactions between the microbiome, metabolism, and the immune system — a network shared as a pathological basis by many hereditary intestinal diseases.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The core microbiota-metabolism-immune interactome in hereditary intestinal disorders. This diagram summarizes a shared pathophysiological network across different diseases. Microbiota Dysbiosis (e.g., SCFA reduction in PJS, colibactin-producing E. coli expansion in LS) drives Metabolic Rewiring, which in turn shapes Immune Dysregulation (e.g., Treg suppression and IFN-γ upregulation). Conversely, immune alterations reciprocally impact the microbiota via factors like antimicrobial peptides and secretory IgA. The dynamic interplay between these three core components creates a self-reinforcing cycle that ultimately leads to a Disruption of Intestinal Homeostasis, manifesting as impaired epithelial barrier function, chronic inflammation, and aberrant proliferation. Disease-specific examples (PJS, LS, FAP, CF, and SBS) of validated interactions are annotated. Arrows indicate the direction of "leads to" or "promotes".

3.3. Tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy

In-depth analysis of the immune microenvironment in precancerous lesions has laid the foundation for immune intervention. The immune signature of PJS polyps resembles that of colorectal cancer tissue, suggesting active immune editing (38). LS-associated dMMR/ MSI-H tumors are highly sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, marking the advent an era of precision immunotherapy (39). The highly expressed frameshift-derived neopeptides in this syndrome provide promising targets for preventive vaccine development (40). These findings collectively indicate that the timing for immune intervention could be significantly advanced to the precancerous stage, providing a rationale for 'interception therapy' for hereditary cancers.

3.4. Early detection and risk stratification strategies

Advances in endoscopic monitoring have significantly improved the detection rate of early lesions. For example, linked color imaging and chromoendoscopy can significantly enhance the identification of neoplastic lesions in LS (41). Genotype-based individualized monitoring schemes have become standard practice; for instance, colonoscopy screening intervals can be tailored based on the specific MMR gene mutation, which is a strategy that has proven cost-effective (42). Figure 2 systematically illustrates this integrated pathway: from initial genetic diagnosis to treatment plan validation based on functional platforms like organoids, culminating in dynamically optimized long-term comprehensive management.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A clinical pathway for precision medicine for congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases. This schematic outlines an integrated, closed-loop pathway from clinical suspicion to individualized management. The journey begins with Clinical Suspicion/Family History, leading to a definitive Genetic Diagnosis through high-throughput sequencing. The pathway then integrates Multi-omic Risk Stratification and functional validation using Organoid Models (e.g., drug sensitivity testing) to inform Individualized Comprehensive Management strategies, including targeted therapies, endoscopic surveillance, surgery, and nutritional support. This framework facilitates long-term, dynamically optimized care, representing a paradigm shift from fragmented interventions to a unified, proactive model of precision medicine.

4. Directions for future research

4.1. Gene editing and precision genomic medicine

Gene editing technologies like CRISPR hold promise for curing monogenic hereditary diseases. Future research needs to focus on developing efficient and safe in vivo delivery systems to correct pathogenic mutations in somatic cells, e.g., repairing CFTR gene function in CF patients or correcting pathogenic variants in key genes like RET causing HSCR (43,44). The core bottlenecks for clinical translation are: the lack of efficient and safe in vivo delivery systems, urgently requiring development of novel vectors targeting epithelia of multiple organs like the gut and lungs; and the verification of long-term safety and controllability, necessitating thorough evaluation of off-target effects and immunogenicity in relevant animal models.

4.2. Immune prevention and neoantigen vaccines

Immune prevention for hereditary cancer syndromes is a highly promising direction. The abundant neoantigens generated by frameshift mutations in LS are ideal targets for developing preventive vaccines (40). Similarly, APC interception vaccines for FAP have entered the proof-of-concept stage and are intended to stimulate the immune system to clear early lesions expressing mutant APC protein (45). The key future challenge lies in overcoming the immune-tolerant microenvironment of precancerous lesions and verifying whether the immune response elicited by a vaccine can provide durable, broad tissue protection in long-term follow-up, thereby effectively preventing multi-organ tumors.

4.3. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering

For structural or functional deficiency diseases, regenerative medicine aims to achieve fundamental functional reconstruction. In HSCR, the research focus is on how to reconstruct a functional enteric nervous system in the aganglionic segment through stem cell/ enteric neural crest cell transplantation (46). For SBS, using organoid tissue engineering technology to construct bioengineered intestine with absorptive function is one ultimate solution for intestinal failure (33). Achieving these goals requires overcoming major challenges such as cell sources and functional integration post-transplantation (e.g., neural connection and vascularization).

4.4. Microbiome engineering and metabolic intervention

As the role of the gut microbiome in disease progression becomes clearer, its precise modulation will become an important adjunct treatment strategy (47). Future approaches may involve designing synthetic microbial communities or engineered bacteria to supplement SCFAs deficient in PJS patients, degrading potential carcinogens in the LS gut, or modulating CF-associated intestinal inflammation (17,35,48). Current research is mostly still at the level of describing correlations between microbiota and disease. In the future, research must move towards causal mechanism verification and, based on this, it must design synthetic microbial communities or engineered bacteria capable of targeted colonization and on-demand secretion of specific metabolites (e.g., supplementing SCFAs deficient in PJS), achieving precise and dynamic remodeling of the gut microecology.

4.5. Multi-omics integration and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven precision management

Utilizing multi-omics data and AI technology to build computational models capable of ultra-early warning, individualized prognosis prediction, and dynamic treatment adjustment is an inevitable trend in the future (1,49). The key challenges in this direction are the standardization and sharing of multi-center, multi-omics data and the development of next-generation AI algorithms that can interpret high-dimensional complex biological networks, rather than merely identifying associations.

5. Conclusion

In recent years, research on common congenital and hereditary intestinal diseases has been undergoing a transition from a "single-gene model" to a "systems biology framework", integrating multi-level networks like immunity, metabolism, and the microbiome, thereby enhancing the ability to explain phenotypic complexity. The understanding of disease mechanisms has also expanded from local intestinal pathology to dynamic coupling between multiple organs and the tumor microenvironment, revealing broader intervention windows. Organoid models are being heavily integrated with AI algorithms and high-throughput screening technologies, creating new platforms for precision medicine and individualized therapy. At the same time, the management of long-term complications from the neonatal period to adulthood has promoted the clinical implementation of the "whole-life-cycle care" concept. Overall, future research and clinical pathways for these intestinal diseases will accelerate towards multi-omics integration, automated screening, intelligent intervention, and dynamic health prediction.

Funding:

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1. Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, Desouza B, Dunlop MG, East JE, Ilyas M, Kaur A, Lalloo F, Latchford A, Rutter MD, Tomlinson I, Thomas HJW, Hill J, Hereditary CRC guidelines eDelphi consensus group. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut. 2020; 69:411-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Conteduca V, Sansonno D, Russi S, Dammacco F. Precancerous colorectal lesions (Review). Int J Oncol. 2013; 43:973-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shepherd A, Feinstein L, Sabel S, Rastelli D, Mezhibovsky E, Matthews L, Muppirala A, Robinson A, Sharma KR, ElSeht A, Zeve D, Breault DT, Gershon MD, Rao M. RET signaling persists in the adult intestine and stimulates motility by limiting PYY release from enteroendocrine cells. Gastroenterology. 2024; 166:437-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Issaka RB, Chan AT, Gupta S. AGA Clinical practice update on risk stratification for colorectal cancer screening and post-polypectomy surveillance: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2023; 165:1280-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Clarke JM, Lockett TJ, Harrap KL, et al. The effect of butyrylated starch on bowel polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Cancer Prev Res Phila Pa. 2025; 18:703-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wu L, Bai R, Zhang Y, Chen H, Wu J, Chen Z, Wang H, Zhao L. METTL3-VISTA axis-based combination immunotherapy for APC truncation colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12:e009865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dong Z, Ojha A, Barlow L, Luo L, Liu JY, Zhang JT. The eIF3a translational control axis in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 2024; 605:217303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li J, Wang R, Zhou X, Wang W, Gao S, Mao Y, Wu X, Guo L, Liu H, Wen L, Fu W, Tang F. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of carcinogenesis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. 2020; 69:1283-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mäki-Nevala S, Kauppinen A, Olkinuora A, Laiho A, Törönen P, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Lepistö A, Seppälä TT, Mecklin JP, Peltomäki P. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of colorectal tumors in Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Epigenetics. 2025; 17:137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Plugge SF, Ma H, van der Vaart JY, et al. Intestinal LKB1 loss drives a premalignant program along the serrated cancer pathway. Gastroenterology. 2025; S0016-5085(25)05850-0. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Domènech-Moreno E, Lim WW, Montrose MG, Sévigny M, Brandt A, Lemmetyinen TT, Viitala EW, Mäkelä TP, Cook SA, Ollila S. Interleukin-11 expressed in the polyp-enriched fibroblast subset is a potential therapeutic target in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. J Pathol. 2025; 266:66-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Compton SE, DeCamp LM, Oswald BM, Kitchen- Goosen SM, Lau KH, Fillinger R, Dahabieh MS, Ark AV, Krawczyk CM, Jones RG. IL-17 links the tumor suppressor LKB1 to gastrointestinal inflammation and polyposis. Sci Adv. 2025; 11:eadt5933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ponti G, Gelsomino F, Tomasi A, Ozben T, Losi L, Manfredini M. Hereditary MicroSatellite Instable cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: Predictive biomarkers and novel immuno-therapeutic approaches. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2025; 62:477-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Keshinro A, Ganesh K, Vanderbilt C, Firat C, Kim JK, Chen CT, Yaeger R, Segal NH, Gonen M, Shia J, Stadler ZK, Weiser MR. Characteristics of mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer in relation to mismatch repair protein loss, hypermethylation silencing, and constitutional and biallelic somatic mismatch repair gene pathogenic variants. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023; 66:549-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kärkkäinen M, Sievänen T, Korhonen T, Tuomikoski J, Pylvänäinen K, Äyrämö S, Seppälä TT, Mecklin J, Laakkonen EK, Jokela T. Integrative omics approaches to uncover liquid‐based cancer‐predicting biomarkers in Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer. 2026; 158:243-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bowen CM, Duzagac F, Martel-Martel A, Reyes-Uribe L, Zaheer M, Thompson J, Deng N, Sinha R, Mazumdar S, Taggart MW, Jain AK, Tosti E, Edelmann W, Sinha KM, Vilar E. Inhibition of histone methyltransferase EZH2 for immune interception of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome. JCI Insight. 2025; 10:e177545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chu YL, Georgeson P, Clendenning M, et a l. Intratumoural pks+Escherichia coli is associated with risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and adenoma development in people with Lynch syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2025; 114:105661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Söderström L, Graneli C, Hagelsteen K, Gunnarsdottir A, Oddsberg J, Svensson PJ, Borg H, Bräutigam M, Gustafson E, Löf Granström A, Stenström P, Wester T. Exploring potential sex differences in Hirschsprung disease: A national cohort study of diagnostic patterns and early postoperative outcome. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025; 41:309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhong Y, So MT, Ma Z, et al. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies novel associations and informs genetic risk prediction for Hirschsprung disease. EBioMedicine. 2025; 115:105680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhou Y, Chi S, Li S, Luo Z, Rong L, Zhang M, Chen Y, Guo J, Yang D, Zhang X, Cao G, Tang ST. Secretagogin downregulation impairs nerve cell migration in Hirschsprung disease via inhibition of the LEF-1/NCAM1 axis. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. 2025; 24:101032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hou X, Yang Y, Wang C, Huang Z, Zhang M, Yang J, Li N, Yang H, Yang L, Wu K. H3K36 methyltransferase SMYD2 affects cell proliferation and migration in Hirschsprung's disease by regulating METTL3. J Cell Physiol. 2024; 239:e31402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rathjen FG, Jüttner R. The IgSF cell adhesion protein CLMP and congenital short bowel syndrome (CSBS). Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24:5719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yu CJ, Ouyang L, An J, Ding Y, Liu ZX, Zhang ZR, Zou MH. Smooth muscle cell (SMC)-specific SNRK deletion in mouse causes congenital short bowel syndrome and premature death. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025; 44:102298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mall MA, Burgel PR, Castellani C, Davies JC, Salathe M, Taylor-Cousar JL. Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2024; 10:53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Young SM, Woode RA, Williams EC, Ericsson AC, Clarke LL. Fecal dysbiosis and inflammation in intestinal-specific Cftr knockout mice on regimens preventing intestinal obstruction. Physiol Genomics. 2024; 56:247-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Scull CE, Hu Y, Jennings S, Wang G. Normalization of Cystic Fibrosis immune system reverses intestinal neutrophilic inflammation and significantly improves the survival of cystic fibrosis mice. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025; 19:101424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Akbulut DG, Özden TA, Cantez MS, Ertekin V, Tamay Z, Durmaz Ö. Fecal calprotectin as a marker of intestinal inflammation in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184:605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bierlaagh MC, Ramalho AS, Silva IAL, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of the forskolin-induced swelling (FIS) assay on intestinal organoids from people with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros Off J Eur Cyst Fibros Soc. 2024; 23:693-702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. de Poel E, Spelier S, Hagemeijer MC, et al. FDA-approved drug screening in patient-derived organoids demonstrates potential of drug repurposing for rare cystic fibrosis genotypes. J Cyst Fibros Off J Eur Cyst Fibros Soc. 2023; 22:548-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Habib A, Mamistvalov R, Malcov M, Ben-Yosef D. Predicting colorectal cancer risk in FAP patients using patient-specific organoids. Cancer Gene Ther. 2025; 32:997-1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Laborde N, Barusseaud A, Quaranta M, Rolland C, Arrouy A, Bonnet D, Kirzin S, Sola-Tapias N, Hamel D, Barange K, Duffas JP, Gratacap MP, Guillermet-Guibert J, Breton A, Vergnolle N, et al. Human colonic organoids for understanding early events of familial adenomatous polyposis pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2025; 265:26-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Habib A, Mamistvalov R, Ben-Yosef D. Rapamycin rescues APC-mutated colon organoid differentiation. Cancer Gene Ther. 2025; 32:1008-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Liu T, Li S, Múnera JO, Shivdasani RA, Huang X, Zhou Q. Remodelling the colon with ileal properties to treat short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2025; 169:352-355.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhou A, Tang B, Xie Y, Li S, Xiao X, Wu L, Tu D, Wang S, Feng Y, Feng X, Lai Y, Ning S, Yang S. Changes of gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. BMC Microbiol. 2023; 23:373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang S, Kou GJ, Zhao XH, Huang G, Wang JX, Tian L, Zuo XL, Li YQ, Wang JY, Yu YB. Altered mucosal bacteria and metabolomics in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2024; 16:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Knoll RL, Brauny MM, Robert E, et al. CFTR modulator therapy drives microbiome restructuring through improved host physiology in cystic fibrosis: The IMMProveCF phase IV trial. Nat Commun. 2025; 16:10111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Goto Y, Masumoto K, Sasaki T, Shirane K, Aoyama T, Sakamoto N, Jimbo T. Efficacy of teduglutide in pediatric short bowel syndrome: Association with citrulline levels and anatomical location of remnant small intestine. Child Basel Switz. 2025; 12:977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Liu Z, Wu B, Shi X, Zhou J, Huang H, Li Z, Yang M. Immune profiling of premalignant lesions in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2025; 13:338-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pellat A, Loisel C, Metras J, Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Cohen R, Samaille T, Perrier A, Dardenne A, André T. Occurrence of dMMR/MSI-H tumor during follow-up in Lynch syndrome patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic digestive cancer between 2015 and 2024: A retrospective analysis of a monocentric prospective cohort study. ESMO Open. 2025; 10:105559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bayó C, Castellano G, Marín F, et al. Discovery and validation of frameshift-derived neopeptides in Lynch syndrome: Paving the way for novel cancer prevention strategies. J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13:e011177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hanen G, Mohammed HE, Nasser M, Haseeb ME, Yaser H, Yaser S, Allam S. Optimizing surveillance in Lynch syndrome: Lesion detection and comparative performance of different colonoscopy modalities-A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40:175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kastrinos F, Ingram MA, Silver ER, Oh A, Laszkowska M, Rustgi AK, Hur C. Gene-specific variation in colorectal cancer surveillance strategies for Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2021; 161:453-462.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Khurram I, Choudhery MS, Ghani MU, Arif T, Naeem A, Mahmood R, Niaz A, Khan MU. Gene editing for cystic fibrosis: Advances and prospects of CRISPR-Cas9 therapy. Cell Biol Int. 2025; 49:1564-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fries LE, Dharma S, Chakravarti A, Chatterjee S. Variability in proliferative and migratory defects in Hirschsprung disease-associated RET pathogenic variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2025; 112:863-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Johnson DE, Disis ML. Vaccines for cancer interception in familial adenomatous polyposis. Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1525157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Windster JD, Kakiailatu NJM, Kuil LE, Antanaviciute A, Sacchetti A, MacKenzie KC, Peulen-Zink J, Kan TW, Bindels E, de Pater E, Doukas M, van den Bosch TPP, Yousefi S, Barakat TS, Meeussen CJHM, et al. Human enteric glia diversity in health and disease: New avenues for the treatment of Hirschsprung disease. Gastroenterology. 2025; 168:965-979.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Li L, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Wang J, Wang L. Single-cell metabolomics in rare disease: From technology to disease. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2024; 13:99-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Price CE, Valls RA, Ramsey AR, Loeven NA, Jones JT, Barrack KE, Schwartzman JD, Royce DB, Cramer RA, Madan JC, Ross BD, Bliska J, O'Toole GA. Intestinal Bacteroides modulates inflammation, systemic cytokines, and microbial ecology via propionate in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis. mBio. 2024; 15:e0314423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Karako K, Tang W. Applications of and issues with machine learning in medicine: Bridging the gap with explainable AI. Biosci Trends. 2025; 18:497-504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Intractable & Rare Diseases Research are provided here courtesy of International Advancement Center for Medicine & Health Research Co.

RESOURCES