Abstract
The predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata, is a crucial biological control agent used globally to manage agricultural pests. Here, we present the chromosome-level genome assembly for this economically important species to provide a foundational resource for understanding its unique predatory biology. By integrating 41.94 Gb of PacBio HiFi, 56.12 Gb of Illumina, and 68.62 Gb of Hi-C sequencing data, we constructed a 1.10 Gb assembly with excellent contiguity (contig N50 = 42.08 Mb; scaffold N50 = 144.30 Mb). A total of 98.85% of the assembled sequences were anchored into eight pseudochromosomes. Genomic analysis revealed that repetitive elements comprise 41.46% of the genome, and we annotated 16,880 protein-coding genes, 98.74% of which were functionally assigned. The quality of the assembly is confirmed by its high completeness (BUSCO score = 98.8%; Merqury QV = 46.33). This high-quality genomic resource will be invaluable for future research into the molecular mechanisms of predation, insecticide resistance, and for optimizing the application of E. furcellata in integrated pest management programs.
Subject terms: Genome, Entomology
Background & Summary
The predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is a polyphagous natural enemy widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions. It serves as a significant biological control agent, preying on over 40 species of agricultural and forestry pests, particularly those from the orders Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera1–3. Its effectiveness in suppressing populations of major pests like Spodoptera litura and Plutella xylostella has established it as a valuable component in integrated pest management (IPM) programs4,5. The practical application of E. furcellata has spurred extensive research into optimizing its mass-rearing techniques, life table parameters, and reproductive success under various diets, aiming to enhance its field performance1,4.
Given its crucial role in agricultural ecosystems, E. furcellata has become a focal point for toxicological and physiological studies. Research has demonstrated that its fitness, reproductive potential, and predatory efficacy can be significantly impacted by exposure to common insecticides such as λ-cyhalothrin and chlorpyrifos6–8. These findings highlight the delicate balance required to integrate chemical and biological control strategies and underscore the need to understand the underlying mechanisms of insecticide tolerance and detoxification. Moreover, studies on its venom composition, which includes components like serine proteases and their inhibitors, have begun to unveil the molecular basis of its potent predatory capabilities9,10.
Despite extensive research into its ecology, behavior, and physiology, the genomic foundation underpinning these complex traits in E. furcellata remains largely unexplored. Previous molecular studies have primarily relied on transcriptomic data or focused on specific gene families, which, while valuable, cannot provide a complete picture of genome architecture, gene regulation, or the evolutionary adaptations related to predation and environmental resilience10,11. The absence of a high-quality, chromosome-level reference genome has been a significant bottleneck, limiting deeper investigations into the genetic basis of key biological processes such as venom evolution, insecticide resistance, and chemosensory perception2,12.
The advancement of high-throughput sequencing technologies provides an unprecedented opportunity to address this knowledge gap. A chromosome-level genome assembly is an essential resource for elucidating the genetic underpinnings of an organism’s unique biology, facilitating comparative genomics, and accelerating molecular breeding efforts for beneficial traits. For a key predatory insect like E. furcellata, a high-quality genome is pivotal for dissecting the genetic pathways involved in its predatory success and its response to environmental stressors, ultimately informing more sustainable and effective pest control strategies3,8,13.
Here, we present the chromosome-level genome assembly for E. furcellata. The final genome size is 1.10 Gb, with 98.85% of the sequence anchored onto 8 chromosomes. The assembly exhibits high contiguity, with a contig N50 of 42.08 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 144.30 Mb. Repetitive elements constitute 41.46% of the genome. We successfully annotated 16,880 protein-coding genes. This high-quality genomic resource provides an essential foundation for exploring the genetic basis of predation, insecticide resistance, and developmental biology in E. furcellata. It will significantly advance our understanding of this economically important predator and offer new avenues for enhancing its application in biological control programs worldwide.
Methods
Sample collection and sequencing
To minimize genomic heterozygosity, a single adult male E. furcellata was selected from a continuously maintained laboratory colony originally established from individuals collected in Hainan, China. High-molecular-weight (HMW) genomic DNA was extracted from dissected thoracic muscle tissue using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. To construct a comprehensive genomic dataset, we prepared three distinct sequencing libraries from this DNA sample. For long-read data, a SMRTbell library with an approximate 20 kb insert size was constructed and sequenced on a PacBio Sequel IIe platform to generate high-fidelity (HiFi) reads for primary contig assembly. For polishing and validation, a separate short-read library (350 bp insert size) was prepared for 150 bp paired-end sequencing on a BGISEQ-500 platform. Finally, to enable chromosome-level scaffolding, an in situ Hi-C library was prepared from thoracic muscle tissue. After chromatin cross-linking, digestion with the MboI restriction enzyme14, and proximity ligation, the library was sequenced with 150 bp paired-end reads on the BGISEQ-500 platform.
To support high-quality gene annotation, total RNA was extracted from a pool of diverse tissues (head, thorax, abdomen, and legs) from another individual of the same population. Following poly(A) enrichment, a transcriptome library was prepared and sequenced on a BGISEQ-500 platform to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. All raw genomic and transcriptomic sequencing data underwent a rigorous quality control pipeline to remove adaptors and low-quality reads. The voucher specimen was deposited in the Insect Collection of Hechi University under accession ID Ef-2024-01.
Genome assembly
We constructed a high-quality reference genome for Eocanthecona furcellata. A hybrid sequencing strategy was employed, integrating three distinct data types. We generated 41.94 Gb of PacBio HiFi reads, providing approximately 38-fold coverage of highly accurate long-read data that formed the backbone of the assembly. These were supplemented by 56.12 Gb (52 × coverage) of Illumina short-read data for polishing and validation, and 68.62 Gb (64 × coverage) of in situ Hi-C data for chromosome-level scaffolding. The initial assembly was performed with hifiasm v0.19.815 with default parameters, leveraging the PacBio HiFi data to produce a set of highly contiguous and accurate contigs. This foundational assembly resulted in a total of 79 contigs with a contig N50 of 42.08 Mb, indicating exceptional continuity at the base level.
To achieve a chromosome-level assembly, the contigs were scaffolded using the comprehensive Hi-C dataset. The Hi-C reads were first rigorously filtered using HiC-Pro v3.1.02516, and the valid interaction pairs were then mapped to the primary contigs with the Juicer pipeline v1.617 to generate a genome-wide contact matrix. This matrix revealed clear interaction patterns that were computationally resolved by HapHiC v1.0.518 using the ‘cluster’ and ‘assembly’ modules to order and orient the contigs into large-scale scaffolds, which were then manually curated using Juicebox v2.1719. The final Hi-C contact map demonstrated a strong diagonal signal and distinct, well-defined chromatin territories corresponding to individual chromosomes (Fig. 1), confirming the high accuracy and completeness of the scaffolding process. The final assembly yielded 16 scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 144.30 Mb.
Fig. 1.
Hi-C interaction heatmap validating the chromosome-level assembly of the E. furcellata genome. The plot visualizes the chromatin contact frequencies across the eight assembled pseudochromosomes. The strong signal intensity concentrated along the diagonal and the distinct, well-defined square territories confirm the structural integrity and the correct ordering and orientation of the scaffolds into final chromosomes.
After binning into chromosomes, the final chromosomal scaffolds contain 63 sequence gaps between adjacent contigs. To characterize these unresolved regions, we mapped the original PacBio HiFi reads back to the assembly using quartet v1.2.520. This analysis indicated that the total length of sequence required to close these gaps is estimated to be at least 157,150 bp. Furthermore, to evaluate the completeness of the chromosome ends, we searched for telomeric repeat sequences also using quartet v1.2.520. Using the identified telomeric repeat motif (AATATC), our analysis predicted the presence of telomeres at both ends of two chromosomes (EoFu03 and EoFu04) and at a single end for five other chromosomes. In total, these predicted telomeric motifs were identified on seven of the eight pseudochromosomes, providing strong evidence for their high degree of structural completeness.
The resulting chromosome-level genome of E. furcellata spans a total of 1.10 Gb, with 1.08 Gb (98.85%) of the sequence successfully anchored and oriented into eight pseudochromosomes, consistent with the karyotypes of several other Pentatomidae species21,22. The overall GC content of the genome was determined to be 32.39%. When compared to other published genomes within the Pentatomidae family, the E. furcellata assembly demonstrates a substantial improvement in sequence continuity. While its genome size and scaffold N50 are comparable to those of species like Aelia acuminata23 and Piezodorus guildinii24, its contig N50 of 42.08 Mb is significantly higher—over 5.7 times greater than the next best assembly—highlighting its exceptional quality as a valuable genomic resource (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of genome assembly parameters of E. furcellata and four published Pentatomidae genomes in the NCBI GenBank database.
| Assembly Metrics | Aelia acuminata (GCA_911387785.2) | Rhaphigaster nebulosa (GCA_948150685.1) | Arma custos (GCA_048127545.1) | Piezodorus guildinii (GCA_023052935.1) | Eocanthecona furcellata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 1,169,999,116 | 1,155,816,268 | 976,577,182 | 1,205,420,128 | 1,092,127,095 |
| Chromosome sequnece No. | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Genome sequence No. | 79 | 75 | 24 | 807 | 65 |
| GC content | 33 | 32 | 33 | 32.5 | 32.39 |
| Scaffold No. | 79 | 75 | 24 | 807 | 18 |
| Scaffold L50 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Scaffold N50 (bp) | 172,186,306 | 186,487,842 | 136,202,916 | 170,835,737 | 144,301,894 |
| Scaffold N90 (bp) | 93,278,539 | 133,601,672 | 110,891,642 | 118,461,799 | 94,292,339 |
| Contig sequence No. | 689 | 1,229 | 466 | 1,267 | 76 |
| Contig L50 | 65 | 199 | 69 | 47 | 11 |
| Contig N50 (bp) | 4,690,255 | 1,716,941 | 4,490,611 | 7,358,154 | 42,082,235 |
| No. Genes | 16,680 | ||||
| Hifi Size/Depth | 41.94 Gb (~38.1×) | ||||
| DNA_NGS Size/Depth | 56.12 Gb (~51.0×) | ||||
| Hi-C Size/Depth | 68.62 Gb (~62.4×) |
Genome annotation
The genomic landscape of E. furcellata was comprehensively characterized. Firstly, we conducted an in-depth analysis of its repetitive elements. Employing an integrated EarlGrey pipeline25 that combined de novo identification using RepeatModeler v2.0.526 with homology-based searches against the Repbase database using RepeatMasker v4.1.527, our analysis revealed that a substantial portion of the genome consists of repetitive sequences. In total, these elements account for 41.46% of the assembly, occupying approximately 454.61 Mb (Fig. 2C, Table S2). The majority of these were classified as interspersed repeats (38.63%), with Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs) being the most prevalent class, constituting 12.08% of the entire genome (Fig. 2E). This was followed by Long Terminal Repeats (LTRs) at 4.76% (Fig. 2D) and DNA transposons at 2.21% (Fig. 2F). Notably, a significant fraction of the repeats (19.84%) could not be classified into known families, suggesting the presence of novel or highly diverged repeat lineages specific to this predatory bug (Fig. 2G).
Fig. 2.
Genomic landscape of the E. furcellata chromosome-level assembly. The circular plot displays key genomic features in concentric tracks. The tracks are ordered from the outermost circle inwards: (A) Chromosome Ideograms: The eight pseudochromosomes (EoFu01–EoFu08) are shown, with coordinate scales in megabases (Mb). (B) Gene Locations: A high-density tick plot where each individual mark indicates the precise position of an annotated protein-coding gene. (C) Total Repetitive Element Density: A heatmap illustrating the density of all identified repetitive elements. (D) LTR Retrotransposon Density: Heatmap showing the density of Long Terminal Repeat retrotransposons. (E) LINE Density: Heatmap showing the density of Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements. (F) DNA Transposon Density: Heatmap showing the density of DNA transposons. (G) Simple Repeat Density: Heatmap showing the density of simple repeats (microsatellites). (H) GC Content: A heatmap representing the percentage of Guanine and Cytosine. All density and content tracks (C–H) were calculated and plotted using a non-overlapping 100 kb window size. For all heatmap tracks, the colour gradient from green to yellow to red corresponds to low, medium, and high density or content values, respectively.
Following the masking of these repetitive regions, we performed a structural annotation to identify protein-coding genes. Our pipeline integrated three complementary streams of evidence: homology-based alignments using protein sets retrieved from hemipteran_odb12 database using miniport v0.1828, transcriptome-guided predictions derived from mapped RNA-seq data using HISAT2 v2.2.129, and species-trained ab initio modeling with AUGUSTUS v3.5.030. These evidence streams were synthesized using the GETA pipeline (https://github.com/chenlianfu/geta) to produce a high-quality, non-redundant gene set. This approach yielded a final count of 16,880 protein-coding genes, including 358 with alternative splicing isoforms (Fig. 2B). The structural characteristics of these genes revealed a mean length of 14.58 kb, with an average of 6.13 exons per gene. The coding sequences were relatively short (mean CDS length of 1.39 kb) compared to the expansive introns (mean intron length of 13.11 kb), indicating a genome architecture rich in non-coding regions.
To ascertain the functional potential of the predicted gene set, we conducted a comprehensive functional annotation using a dual-pronged strategy. First, all protein sequences were queried against the NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein database using DIAMOND blastp (v2.1.9) with sensitive mode31. Second, conserved domains and functional sites were identified using InterProScan v5.72-103.032 against the Pfam, CDD, SMART, and SUPERFAMILY databases, which also provided Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments. By merging the results from both analyses, we successfully assigned putative functions to 16,687 genes, representing 98.74% of the total annotated protein-coding gene set.
Data Records
The chromosome-level genome assembly of E. furcellata has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database under the accession number GCA_052056905.133. All raw sequencing data generated in this study have been made publicly available through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP60568534. The PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing data used for primary contig assembly are accessible under accession number SRR34824520. Illumina short-read whole genome sequencing data used for error correction and heterozygosity assessment are available under accession number SRR34824518. The Hi-C sequencing data utilized for chromosome-level scaffolding can be accessed under accession number SRR34824519. Additionally, the RNA-sequencing data used for genome annotation and transcriptome analysis have been deposited under accession number SRR34824517. In addition, the final genome annotation files, including the coding sequences (CDS), protein sequences (PEP), gene feature format file (GFF3), and the comprehensive functional annotation table, have been deposited in Figshare and are accessible at 10.6084/m9.figshare.3015736035.
Technical Validation
To validate the quality of the E. furcellata genome, we conducted a multi-faceted evaluation of its accuracy, completeness, and continuity. The structural integrity and fidelity of the assembly were first confirmed by mapping the original sequencing reads back to the final sequence using BWA v0.7.1736 and minimap2 v2.3037. An overwhelming majority of the raw data aligned successfully, with a mapping rate of 99.47% for the Illumina short reads and 99.97% for the PacBio HiFi long reads, indicating that the assembly is a faithful and comprehensive representation of the genomic content. We further assessed the base-level accuracy using k-mer analysis with Merqury v1.338, which yielded an exceptionally high-quality value (QV) of 46.33, signifying an estimated error rate of less than one per 40,000 bases. The completeness of the gene space was then rigorously benchmarked using BUSCO v6.0.039 against the Hemiptera (hemiptera_odb12) single-copy ortholog set. This analysis revealed that 98.8% of the conserved genes were present and complete in our assembly, with 97.5% found as single-copy and 1.3% as duplicated. Only a minor fraction was identified as fragmented (0.1%) or were missing (1.1%). Collectively, the near-perfect read mapping rates, outstanding base-level accuracy, and high degree of gene completeness underscore the exceptional quality of our chromosome-level assembly, establishing it as a robust resource for subsequent genomic research.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Local Science and Technology Development Fund project guided by the central government (Heke ZY230301), the 2023 Annual Operation Subsidy Project of the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sericulture Ecology and Applied Intelligent Technology (23-026-08), the Yizhou High-quality Development of Cocoon and Silk Industry Talent Introduction Project (HCZC2024-G3-810273-HZTG).
Author contributions
D.G. conceived the project and supervised the study. Y.Q. and S.Z. collected the samples. L.X. and S.Z. performed the experiments. Y.C.Q., Y.Q., and L.X. performed the computational analyses and data curation. N.W. performed formal investigation. N.W. and D.G. wrote the manuscript. L.X. and X.D.L. revised the manuscript. X.D.L and D.G. received fundings. All authors approved the final manuscript for submission.
Data availability
The genome assembly and annotation data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession GCA_052056905.1. The raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP60568534. The final genome annotation files are publicly available in the Figshare repository under 10.6084/m9.figshare.3015736035.
Code availability
The entire analytical pipeline was implemented using well-established, open-source bioinformatics tools. This approach obviated the need for developing complex custom scripts and instead relied on validated, community-standard methods. Reproducibility was further enforced through systematic dependency management using the Conda environment system, which guarantees a consistent software stack across different computational infrastructures. For complete methodological clarity, the precise command-line instructions and all parameters employed for each data processing, assembly, and annotation step are explicitly provided in the Methods section, allowing for the independent verification and replication of our results.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41597-025-06185-0.
References
- 1.Yuan, J. et al. Demographic parameters and asynchronous ovary development in Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) reared on different diets. Journal of economic entomology118, 1051–1060, 10.1093/jee/toaf040 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parveen, S., Ahmad, A., Brożek, J. & Ramamurthy, V. V. Morphological diversity of the labial sensilla of phytophagous and predatory Pentatomidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), with reference to their possible functions. Zootaxa4039, 359–372, 10.11646/zootaxa.4039.2.9 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pan, Y. N. et al. Assessment of Suitable Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Normalization in Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff). Insects13, 10.3390/insects13090773 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Tuan, S. J., Yeh, C. C., Atlihan, R. & Chi, H. Linking Life Table and Predation Rate for Biological Control: A Comparative Study of Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Fed on Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of economic entomology109, 13–24, 10.1093/jee/tov265 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pan, C. N. et al. Fitness implications of low-temperature storage for Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of economic entomology117, 1739–1752, 10.1093/jee/toae199 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yao, Q. et al. Predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) responses to oral exposure route of λ-cyhalothrin via sex-specific modulation manner. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology192, 105381, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105381 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu, S. et al. Sublethal effect of chlorpyrifos on predatory behavior and physiology of Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of economic entomology117, 156–166, 10.1093/jee/toad212 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qiong, Y., Linfa, Q., Shu, X., Longyu, Y. & Bingxu, C. Detrimental Impact of λ-Cyhalothrin on the Biocontrol Efficacy of Eocanthecona furcellata by Affecting Global Transcriptome and Predatory Behavior. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry70, 1037–1046, 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06237 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang, M. et al. Functional analysis of serine protease EfSP1 in Eocanthecona furcellata Wolff (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Pest management science81, 4515–4529, 10.1002/ps.8809 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang, M. et al. Identification and functional analysis of serine protease inhibitor gene family of Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff). Frontiers in physiology14, 1248354, 10.3389/fphys.2023.1248354 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pang, R. et al. Decreased cuticular penetration minimizes the impact of the pyrethroid insecticide λ-cyhalothrin on the insect predator Eocanthecona furcellata. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety249, 114369, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114369 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhao, H. et al. Observation of the fine structure of antennal sensilla of the stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Micron (Oxford, England: 1993)150, 103143, 10.1016/j.micron.2021.103143 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yasui, H. Sequestration of host plant-derived compounds by geometrid moth, Milionia basalis, toxic to a predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata. Journal of chemical ecology27, 1345–1353, 10.1023/a:1010361125048 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cardamone, F., Zhan, Y., Iovino, N. & Zenk, F. Chromosome Conformation Capture Followed by Genome-Wide Sequencing (Hi-C) in Drosophila Embryos. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2655, 41–55, 10.1007/978-1-0716-3143-0_4 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cheng, H. Y., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X. W., Zhang, H. W. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nature Methods18, 170–+, 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biology16, 10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. Cell Systems3, 95–98, 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zeng, X. F. et al. Chromosome-level scaffolding of haplotype-resolved assemblies using Hi-C data without reference genomes. Nature Plants10, 10.1038/s41477-024-01755-3 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox Provides a Visualization System for Hi-C Contact Maps with Unlimited Zoom. Cell Systems3, 99–101, 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin, Y. et al. quarTeT: a telomere-to-telomere toolkit for gap-free genome assembly and centromeric repeat identification. Horticulture research10, uhad127, 10.1093/hr/uhad127 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grozeva, S., Kuznetsova, V. G. & Anokhin, B. A. Karyotypes, male meiosis and comparative FISH mapping of 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG) n repeat in eight species of true bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Comparative cytogenetics5, 355–374, 10.3897/CompCytogen.v5i4.2307 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rebagliati, P. J. & Mola, L. M. Meiotic behavior and karyotypic variation in Acledra (Pentatomidae, Heteroptera). Genetics and molecular research: GMR9, 739–749, 10.4238/vol9-2gmr763 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Crowley, L. & Barclay, M. V. L. The genome sequence of the bishop’s mitre shieldbug, Aelia acuminata (Linnaeus, 1758). Wellcome open research6, 320, 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17400.1 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Walt, H. K., King, J. G., Towles, T. B., Ahn, S. J. & Hoffmann, F. G. Comparative Genomics and the Salivary Transcriptome of the Redbanded Stink Bug Shed Light on Its High Damage Potential to Soybean. Genome biology and evolution16, 10.1093/gbe/evae121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Baril, T., Galbraith, J. & Hayward, A. Earl Grey: A Fully Automated User-Friendly Transposable Element Annotation and Analysis Pipeline. Molecular Biology and Evolution41, 10.1093/molbev/msae068 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117, 9451–9457, 10.1073/pnas.1921046117 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Current protocols in bioinformatics Chapter 4, Unit 4.10, 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s05 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li, H. Protein-to-genome alignment with miniprot. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)39, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad014 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Kim, D., Landmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods12, 357–U121, 10.1038/nmeth.3317 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic acids research34, W435–439, 10.1093/nar/gkl200 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods12, 59–60, 10.1038/nmeth.3176 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)30, 1236–1240, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guan, D.-L. Genbankhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_052056905.1 (2025).
- 34.Guan, D.-L. NCBI. Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP605685 (2025).
- 35.Guan et al. Genome annotation and protein-coding gene set for the chromosome-level assembly of the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata. Figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.30157360 (2025).
- 36.Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)26, 589–595, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)34, 3094–3100, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biology21, 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: Assessing Genome Assembly and Annotation Completeness. Methods Mol Biol1962, 227–245, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Guan, D.-L. Genbankhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_052056905.1 (2025).
- Guan et al. Genome annotation and protein-coding gene set for the chromosome-level assembly of the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata. Figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.30157360 (2025).
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genome assembly and annotation data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession GCA_052056905.1. The raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP60568534. The final genome annotation files are publicly available in the Figshare repository under 10.6084/m9.figshare.3015736035.
The entire analytical pipeline was implemented using well-established, open-source bioinformatics tools. This approach obviated the need for developing complex custom scripts and instead relied on validated, community-standard methods. Reproducibility was further enforced through systematic dependency management using the Conda environment system, which guarantees a consistent software stack across different computational infrastructures. For complete methodological clarity, the precise command-line instructions and all parameters employed for each data processing, assembly, and annotation step are explicitly provided in the Methods section, allowing for the independent verification and replication of our results.


