Skip to main content
ERJ Open Research logoLink to ERJ Open Research
letter
. 2025 Dec 1;11(6):00585-2025. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00585-2025

Mycoplasma pneumoniae re-emergence in 2023 causes disease in adults in Europe

Bianca MM Streng 1,, Louis J Bont 1, Patrick M Meyer Sauteur 2, Marc JM Bonten 3,4, Annemarie MC van Rossum 5, Cristina Prat Aymerich 3,6
PMCID: PMC12683588  PMID: 41367658

Extract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of respiratory tract infections in children and young adults [1]. An estimate of 3–10% of the children infected with M. pneumoniae develop community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [2] and in rarer cases, complications are seen [2, 3]. Pulmonary complications such as pleural effusion or bronchiolitis obliterans [3], but also extrapulmonary complications such as mucocutaneus disease, manifestations of the central nervous system and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, amongst others, have been described [3–6].

Shareable abstract

Data indicate increased severity of M. pneumoniae infections in the latest outbreak, especially in adults, compared to pre-COVID-19. Insights from this rapid questionnaire can improve outbreak research, strengthen preparedness and enable faster responses. https://bit.ly/4kN0zu3


To the Editor:

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of respiratory tract infections in children and young adults [1]. An estimate of 3–10% of the children infected with M. pneumoniae develop community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [2] and in rarer cases, complications are seen [2, 3]. Pulmonary complications such as pleural effusion or bronchiolitis obliterans [3], but also extrapulmonary complications such as mucocutaneus disease, manifestations of the central nervous system and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, amongst others, have been described [36]. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, M. pneumoniae typically caused cyclic outbreaks every 3–7 years, lasting approximately 12–15 months [7]. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, like other pathogens [8], a sudden dip in M. pneumoniae circulation was observed [9]. Where other pathogens rose again after lifting the first restrictions, M. pneumoniae incidence stayed low until 2023 [9].

In summer 2023, re-emergence of M. pneumoniae in Europe and Asia started, with increased numbers of cases of childhood CAP [9, 10]. Interestingly, available hospital data showed an increase in M. pneumoniae detections in adults in hospitals in The Netherlands and France, with severe cases needing admission to the hospital and supportive care in the intensive care unit (ICU) [1114]. So, unlike other M. pneumoniae outbreaks, adults also appeared to be at risk for a more severe course of disease. However, information is scarce and fragmented, and up to now, apart from the global surveillance by the ESGMAC MAPS study [15], real-time monitoring in primary and secondary care on a national level in Europe is lacking.

Our objective was to conduct an initial analysis of data, collected within the European Clinical Research Alliance on Infectious Diseases (Ecraid) consortium, across Europe to determine if there was an increase or distinct pattern of disease compared to other outbreaks.

Ecraid is a European Union-funded clinical research network for infectious diseases that serves as a platform for clinical research preparedness and response to (re-)emerging infectious diseases threats. At the heart of ECRAID-Base are five perpetual observational studies (POSs) [16], which aim to support efficient implementation of observational studies and randomised trials by harmonised data collection through application of standardised definitions across study sites. The POSs in Ecraid are multicentre studies designed to address key clinical research gaps, including variations in clinical practices, incidence of infectious disease syndromes and associated risk factors.

In December 2023, a questionnaire was developed to evaluate M. pneumoniae cases throughout the Ecraid clinical network, in a short period of time with the timelines as shown in figure 1a. The questionnaire was developed with input and guidance from experts in the field of M. pneumoniae. It included questions about the medical specialty of the reporting physician, the country of practice and the testing policies in place. Moreover, the questionnaire collected information on the estimated number of M. pneumoniae cases for both paediatric and adult populations, as well as the estimated number of ICU admissions due to M. pneumoniae, for the post-COVID-19 season in 2023–2024 and for previous seasons (in time period of 2018–2022). As not all countries experienced the post-COVID-19 M. pneumoniae season simultaneously, we did not define exact start and end dates for the season. Answers were reviewed and data cleaning independently performed by two researchers to ensure data quality. Partially completed questionnaires (<22%), duplicates and questionnaires lacking either country or specialty of reporting physician were excluded from analysis.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Overview of study procedures and main results. a) Timelines of setup of the questionnaire and data collection. The questionnaire was send out on 14 January 2024 and closed for further responses on 7 February 2024. b) Number of hospitals responding to the questionnaire categorised by country. In some centres, we received multiple responses from different medical specialists. These responses are counted as a single centre and categorised as intensive care unit (ICU) if an ICU response was included. c) Number of patients admitted to the general ward and ICU categorised per country. d) Ratio of number of clinical cases per country in before the 2023–2024 season/in the 2023–2024 season on the general ward and ICU. The pink threshold represents a ratio of 1. Created with BioRender.com.

Data are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. For the clinical case and ICU admission data, the ratio of the number of patients in 2023–2024 to the number of patients of previous seasons was computed. Analyses were performed using R (version 4.4.0).

The questionnaire was sent to ∼150 sites from the POS VAP, POS cUTI, POS ARI ER, PNEUMO and REMAP-CAP studies (figure 1a). Some sites were participating in multiple studies. 85 individual Ecraid participants replied to the questionnaire, with completed data from 66 (69%), representing 59 hospitals or medical centres, hereafter referred to as centres. In four reporting centres, multiple specialists from the same site responded to the questionnaire. Of all responses, the majority were from intensive care specialists (30 out of 66, 45%), 20 (30%) out of 66 were infectious diseases specialists and seven (11%) out of 66 were from the pulmonology department. Responses were received from 15 different countries within Europe (figure 1b). Most responding centres were in the UK (n=11, 19%), the Netherlands (n=9, 15%) and Spain (n=9, 15%). The physicians reported working mainly in general adult care; only one reported being a paediatrician.

In previous seasons, 20 (34%) out of 59 reported routine testing for M. pneumoniae, while 28 (47%) out of 59 tested only in selected cases. During the 2023–2024 season, testing in selected cases has increased to 29 (49%) out of 59 and routine testing to 27 (46%) out of 59. In previous seasons, diagnosis was mainly through a combination of PCR and serology in 18 (31%) out 59, with serology alone in 14 (24%) out of 59 and PCR alone in 12 (20%) out of 59. In the 2023–2024 season, the combination remained the most common (23 out of 59, 39%), but the use of serology alone has decreased to nine (15%) out of 59, while PCR alone has increased to 18 (31%) out of 59.

For the number or reported patients admitted to the hospital and ICU, the data were pooled per country and a ratio over time (numbers in 2023–2024 season/previous seasons) was calculated to give a more balanced indication of numbers. The reported numbers of patients with M. pneumoniae infection admitted to the hospital have increased in the 2023–2024 season in Croatia, France, the UK and the Netherlands (figure 1c and d), with the highest reported numbers in France, the UK and the Netherlands. In Belgium, Greece, Portugal and Serbia, the numbers were almost the same. For the remaining countries, no increase was seen in Czech Republic, Italy, Romania and Slovenia (figure 1c). In Estonia, for both the 2023–2024 and previous seasons, the participating centre reported no patients. Patients admitted to the ICU increased by ratios >2 in France, the UK and the Netherlands. Serbia reported almost an equal number of clinical cases but reported a higher number of ICU admissions with a ratio >1 (figure 1c and d).

We report an estimation of the M. pneumoniae cases with admission to the hospital in multiple countries in Europe using the Ecraid network. Our results suggest an increase in hospitalised M. pneumoniae cases throughout some countries in Europe and indication of an increase in disease severity with the need for ICU care. This observation was mainly reported by clinicians in France, the UK and the Netherlands. Some countries reported low rates of clinical cases and ICU admissions, suggesting that the current increase in M. pneumoniae-related hospital admissions is due to more localised transmission and spread of M. pneumoniae rather than across Europe.

We report, in some countries, a significant increase in numbers of adults requiring hospitalisation or ICU admission. This is unexpected, as M. pneumoniae is primarily associated with mild and self-limiting infections in children and adolescents [1]. However, immunity to M. pneumoniae wanes during periods of non-exposure and during the presence of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, a decrease in detection of M. pneumoniae-specific IgM and IgG antibodies from 2020 to 2023 was reported [9, 17]. This waning immunity might have contributed to higher numbers of more severely ill adults.

This short report gives a glimpse of the current situation in the M. pneumoniae outbreak in Europe in 2023–2024. The study was set up during a short period of time enabling us to act fast and collect data at the time of outbreak. This approach also has limitations. First, the kind of data generated with this kind of research might be subject to bias. We did not retrieve data generated from the electronic patient files but asked the physicians to estimate numbers; this might also lead to recall bias from the estimated numbers of the period before 2023. However, since the aim of this rapid questionnaire rollout was to quickly gather information on the resurgence and number of M. pneumoniae cases across Europe in the 2023–2024 season, these estimates were sufficient to detect early signals. In some countries, we had low response to the questionnaire, leading to uneven participation in the questionnaire. This might give an over or underestimation in numbers or effects. Second, apart from one paediatrician, all reporting specialists were practitioners in adult medical care, which may be explained by the setup of the Ecraid network. As M. pneumoniae predominantly affects paediatric patients, this study underestimates the disease burden during the 2023–2024 season in children. Third, we did not specify or define case or disease severity. ICU care is organised differently throughout in countries in Europe, sometimes even within countries, with different in indications for ICU admission. This makes it impossible to use this factor as indication of severity of disease or draw conclusions from these data regarding severity of disease. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic changed the testing policies and/or habits in physicians, leading to higher numbers of M. pneumoniae.

Here, we present the results of a rapid response inquiry of the resurgence and number of M. pneumoniae cases across Europe in the 2023–2024 season. Our data suggest an increase in the severity of infections, particularly among adults, compared to what was observed in previous years (pre-COVID-19). The lessons learned from this rapid questionnaire rollout can facilitate the setup of research during outbreaks, potentially contributing to improved pandemic and outbreak preparedness, and enabling faster responses.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participating sites of the ECRAID Base: POS VAP, POS cUTI, POS ARI ER and PNEUMO and REMAP-CAP studies; and the following collaborators on this project. Bruno François; Intensive care unit, and Inserm CIC 1435 and UMR 1092, University Hospital Centre of Limoges, Limoges, France. Jesús Rodriguez Baño; Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla/CSIC, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/Departamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, and CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Janko van Beek; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Pieter L.A. Fraaij; Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, and Department of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Marion P.G. Koopmans; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, and Pandemic and Disaster Preparedness Center, Delft, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Michael L. Beeton; Microbiology and Infection Research Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. Jake Dunning; Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. Lennie P.G. Derde; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, and Department of Intensive Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Steven F.I. van Lelyveld; Department of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, the Netherlands. Ruben C.A. de Groot; Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Marlies A. van Houten; Department of Paediatric Diseases, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, the Netherlands. Ellen van Deuren: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Footnotes

Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

Author contributions: All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. B.M.M. Streng and C. Prat Aymerich performed dataset preparation, data analysis and interpretation of the results. B.M.M. Streng wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the review and editing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all data and the final responsibility to submit for publication.

Conflict of interest: B.M.M. Streng declares to have no conflict. L.J. Bont has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. He is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. P.M. Meyer Sauteur is supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and the EMDO Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland, unrelated to this work. In the past 36 months, he has served on advisory boards (Roche, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and GSK) and given presentations (Fomf, FPH Forum, ZAIM MediDays and Insight Pediatrics) with payments to the institution (University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland). M.J.M. Bonten has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. He has not received personal fees or other personal benefits. University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) and/or the European Clinical Research Alliance on Infectious Diseases (ECRAID) received funding for investigator-initiated studies from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, Novavax, Sequiris and GSK. A.M.C. van Rossum declares that she has no conflict. C. Prat Aymerich is an associate editor of ERJ Open Research. UMCU has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV GOLD study from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding from Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by MedImmune and Pfizer. UMCU received minor funding (€1000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GSK, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme and Janssen. UMCU and/or ECRAID received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded COMBACTE-NET, COMBACTE CARE, COMBACTE-MAGNET, VITAL and PriMaVeRA.

Support statement: The ECRAID-Base project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, under the Grant Agreement number 965313. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

References

  • 1.Wang K, Gill P, Perera R, et al. Clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children and adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD009175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009175.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meyer Sauteur PM, Unger WWJ, Nadal D, et al. Infection with and carriage of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 329. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Waites KB, Xiao L, Liu Y, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond. Clin Microbiol Rev 2017; 30: 747–809. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00114-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parrott GL, Kinjo T, Fujita J. A compendium for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Front Microbiol 2016; 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meyer Sauteur PM, Theiler M, Buettcher M, et al. Frequency and clinical presentation of mucocutaneous disease due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156: 144–150. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Groot RCA, Meyer Sauteur PM, Unger WWJ, et al. Things that could be Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Infect 2017; 74: Suppl. 1, S95–S100. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30198-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beeton ML, Zhang XS, Uldum SA, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections, 11 countries in Europe and Israel, 2011 to 2016. Euro Surveill 2020; 25. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.2.1900112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chow EJ, Uyeki TM, Chu HY. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community respiratory virus activity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2023; 21: 195–210. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00807-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, Pereyre S, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: delayed re-emergence after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Lancet Microbe 2024; 5: e100–e101. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00344-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, Pereyre S, et al. Pneumonia outbreaks due to re-emergence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Lancet Microbe 2024; 5: e514. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00406-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goeijenbier M, van der Bie S, Souverein D, et al. Post COVID-19 pandemic increased detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults admitted to the intensive care. J Clin Med 2024; 13: 3443. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bolluyt DC, Euser SM, Souverein D, et al. Increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections and hospital admissions in the Netherlands, November to December 2023. Euro Surveill 2024; 29. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.4.2300724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Larcher R, Boudet A, Roger C, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae is back! Is it the next pandemic? Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2024; 43: 101338. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zayet S, Poloni S, Plantin J, et al. Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized patients: Who is concerned? Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, France, 2023–2024. Epidemiol Infect 2024; 152: e46. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meyer Sauteur PM, Zhang XS, Emborg HD, et al. Global spatiotemporal dynamics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae re-emergence after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: an epidemiological and transmission modelling study. Lancet Microbe 2025; 6: 101019. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hassoun-Kheir N, van Werkhoven CH, Dunning J, et al. Perpetual observational studies: new strategies to support efficient implementation of observational studies and randomized trials in infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28: 1528–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, Pereyre S, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: gone forever? Lancet Microbe 2023; 4: e763. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00182-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ERJ Open Research are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES