Abstract
Medicolegal issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care were considered in the United States by the National Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in 1985. This paper discusses these issues in the Canadian context. Although there is little legislation or case precedent in Canada to guide providers of CPR in decision-making, there appears to be little risk of liability or prosecution for competently rendered care. Providers should be cautious in withholding or withdrawing resuscitative measures from incompetent patients when brain death has not occurred and cardiovascular unresponsiveness has not been demonstrated. However, resuscitation may be withheld when a competent patient refuses it or if there is another medically and legally valid reason to do so.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dickens Bernard M. The right to natural death. McGill Law J. 1981;26(4):847–879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg M. S., Bergner L., Hallstrom A. Cardiac resuscitation in the community. Importance of rapid provision and implications for program planning. JAMA. 1979 May 4;241(18):1905–1907. doi: 10.1001/jama.241.18.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyserlingk Edward W. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital. McGill Law J. 1987 Mar;32(2):413–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kushnir Lorri. Bridging the gap: the discrepancy between the medical and legal definitions of death. Univ Tor Fac Law Rev. 1976 Summer;34(2):199–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpe Gilbert. "No-resuscitation" orders. Gaz Law Soc Upper Can. 1977 Jun;11(2):122–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Somerville Margaret A. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances. Can Bar Rev. 1985;63:59–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]